Oppo Find X5 Pro评测--配备哈苏相机的时尚智能手机

Name: Oppo Find X5 Pro
Brand: Oppo

大量的改进 凭借其旗舰智能手机Find X5 Pro，Oppo提供了一个强大的整体包装，确实缺少什么。关注的焦点是三摄像头，除其他外，它再次依靠两个IMX766传感器。这一次，它配备了自己的ISP NPU，本评论分析了这个概念。这个概念可行吗？

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 04/06/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android Touchscreen Smartphone

Oppo Find X5 Pro超越了Find X3 Pro，与前代产品差别不大。后盖的有机外观设计得以保留，手机变得更重。显微镜镜头已被取消，电池更大，其余的相机也得到了很多微调。但没有新的传感器。

Find X5 Pro目前在欧洲只提供单一内存型号，而且没有像在中国那样提供联发科Dimensity 9000。唯一可用的机型配备了高通骁龙8代。RRP为1299欧元，价格也明显上升。

Test device courtesy of Oppo Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Oppo Find X5 Pro (Find X5 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 730, Core: 818 MHz

Memory

12 GB

, LPDDR5, 3200 MHz

Display

6.70 inch 20.1:9, 3216 x 1440 pixel 526 PPI, capacitive, 10 point multi touch, AMOLED, LTPO, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB

, 231.9 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Geomagnetic, Color, Proximity, Accelerometer, Magnetometer, G-Sensor, 13-Channel-Spectral, On The Go adapter

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.5 x 163.7 x 73.9

Battery

19.35 Wh, 5000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 3.7 V

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 12

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Sony IMX766, 1/1,56", f/1.7, PDAF, OIS) + 50 MPix (Ultra wide, IMX766, 1/1,56", f/2.2, 110.3 °, PDAF) + 13 MPix (2x optical Zoom, f/2.4); MariSilicon X; Camera2-API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (Sony IMX709, f/2.4)

Additional features

Keyboard: On-screen, 80W charger, USB-cable (Type-A to Type-C), silicon case, OTG adapter, SIM tool, ColorOS 12.1, 24 Months Warranty, DRM Widevine L1, ClearKey 1.2, GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1), BeiDou (B1, B1C), QZSS (L1); Head-SAR: 0.989 W/kg, Body-SAR: 1.272 W/kg, IP68; photo aspect ratio: 4:3, 1:1, 16:9 and full; video aspect ratio: 16:9, fanless, waterproof

Weight

221 g, Power Supply: 150 g

Price

1299 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
89.2 %	04/2022	Oppo Find X5 Pro SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	221 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	3216x1440
88.9 %	03/2021	Oppo Find X3 Pro SD 888 5G, Adreno 660	193 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	3216x1440
89.4 %	03/2022	Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920	228 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.80"	3088x1440
90.5 %	10/2021	Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15, A15 GPU 5-Core	238 g	128 GB NVMe	6.70"	2778x1284
87.6 %	02/2022	Xiaomi 12 Pro SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	204 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.73"	3200x1440
87.9 %	03/2022	Motorola Edge 30 Pro SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	196 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	2400x1080

设计--一件由玻璃和陶瓷制成的高贵的服装

Oppo Find X5 Pro的名义厚度为8.5毫米^（1/3英寸），但我们的测量结果是8.7毫米。在摄像头的最高点，它甚至达到了11.15毫米，结果是这款智能手机在平面上摇晃得相当厉害，即使带着保护套。Find X5 Pro有两种颜色可供选择--黑色和白色。

屏幕由康宁大猩猩Victus玻璃制成，而背面则由纳米陶瓷制成。Find X5 Pro相当重，但它的平衡性很好，其圆润的边缘使它能够舒适地放在你的手中。然而，两边都是真正的指纹磁铁，手机背面简明的法律标记相当难看。这可以处理得更优雅。

制造质量是令人信服的。接合处紧密而均匀，扭转时的嘎吱声可以忽略不计。 SIM卡托盘的盖子与铝制框架齐平，具有相同的颜色，可以容纳两张纳米SIM卡。Find X5 Pro通过了IP68认证，使其既能防尘又能防水。

尺寸比较

Xiaomi 12 Pro Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Oppo Find X5 Pro Motorola Edge 30 Pro Oppo Find X3 Pro Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max DIN A6 ❌

特点 - 没有惊喜

Oppo Find X5 Pro有一个快速的USB 3.2端口，它不仅为智能手机充电，还提供了连接OTG适配器的方式，实现了有线图像输出和多屏幕显示。

通知LED不包括在内，因为它已被永远在线的显示功能所取代；Oppo智能手机中也没有安装无线电接收器或音频插孔。不提供使用microSD卡的内存扩展。

软件 - FinX5 Pro,Android 12和ColorOS 12.1

OPPO配备了Android 12和内部用户界面ColorOS 12.1。OPPO提到两年的更新和另外第三年的安全补丁，计划每月推出。

OPPO预装了一些第三方应用程序，包括亚马逊、Facebook、TikTok和AliExpress等等。不过，这些都可以轻松卸载。此外，这款智能手机的显示屏可以通过其多屏支持功能在Windows PC上进行镜像。它可以从那里完全操作，包括通过拖放进行数据传输。虽然该程序本身只有英文版本，但它可以完美运行。

通信和GNSS - 追踪效果一般，没有Wi-Fi 6E

Oppo Find X5 Pro支持所有主要的蜂窝网络标准，包括5G Sub6，但不支持mmWave。5G-SA和NSA的频率覆盖范围都很广，所以应该不会有接收问题。

WLAN模块完全符合Wi-Fi 6规范（包括VHT160），但Oppo智能手机在与我们的参考路由器--华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000的测试中，将自己限制在80MHz的通道宽度。因此，传输率非常稳定，但确实仍有很大的改进空间。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1465 (1307^min - 1536^max) MBit/s +79%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	933 (833^min - 949^max) MBit/s +14%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	820 (799^min - 837^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	716 (539^min - 791^max) MBit/s -13%
Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=208, last 2 years)	657 MBit/s -20%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1214 (516^min - 1524^max) MBit/s +36%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	898 (852^min - 931^max) MBit/s +1%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	890 (433^min - 934^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=209, last 2 years)	694 MBit/s -22%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	521 (311^min - 704^max) MBit/s -41%
iperf3 transmit AX12
Oppo Find X3 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1281 (635^min - 1400^max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	875 (836^min - 889^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	718 (707^min - 724^max) MBit/s
Oppo Find X3 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	697 (500^min - 767^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	376 MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1704 (852^min - 1767^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (229 - 1894, n=61, last 2 years)	1536 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1702 (1642^min - 1735^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (598 - 1840, n=61, last 2 years)	1364 MBit/s

Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø819 (799-837)

Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø933 (833-949)

Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø876 (433-934)

Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø898 (852-931)

在GNSS支持方面，Oppo Find X5 Pro几乎只限于单频操作，只有北斗支持两个频段。GPS信号锁定在户外发生的速度相当快，但需要一些时间才能精确地确定位置并使信号变得稳定。

这在我们的短途自行车骑行中也很明显，在骑行过程中，我们对Find X5 Pro和Garmin Venu 2智能手表进行了比较。有点令人惊讶的是，两款设备记录的距离长度相同，但智能手机有一种穿越围场和飞过桥梁的趋势。尽管如此，对于简单的导航来说，这应该是足够的。

功能和语音质量

与它的前辈Find X3 Pro一样，我们对X5 Pro在电话功能方面也比较满意。耳边的语音质量在两个方向都非常好，只有非常大的环境噪音会导致用户的声音轻微失真。否则，环境噪音几乎完全被过滤掉了。扬声器的声音很有冲击力，但声音有轻微的溅射质量，在更远的距离上混响很明显。

Oppo Find X5 Pro可以容纳两张nano SIM卡，或使用eSIM代替物理SIM。支持VoLTE和Wi-Fi通话，但没有内置的SIP账户管理。

摄像机 - 从四台到三台

Oppo Find X5 Pro的前置摄像头的技术规格没有改变；3200万像素和一个固定的对焦镜头。图像质量很好，应用程序提供了丰富的设置选项来定制自己的外观。不幸的是，视频录制仅限于全高清。

背面的主摄像头与去年的传感器相同，但显微镜镜头已被移除。然而，Oppo已经优化了大部分的相机设置。使用了更多的玻璃镜头元件，图像稳定现在由三轴传感器移位和双轴OIS组成，作为锦上添花，Oppo已经引入了一个额外的成像NPU与MariSilicon X。

主摄像头拍摄的照片真的很棒，然而，在使用默认设置时，颜色有点冷。我们本以为颜色会稍微真实一些，特别是由于与哈苏的合作是专门针对这一功能的。我们也喜欢它的图像稳定功能，可以消除相机抖动，即使是长焦距（高达20倍的数字放大）。然而，当使用5倍混合变焦时，图像可以做得更锐利一点。

超广角有很好的景深，在边缘部分只显示最小的色差，这确实是一个非常有说服力的发现。该镜头还可作为微距镜头使用。当以这种方式使用时，相机会自动切换。这并不是一个光学上的缺点，因为它使用的是与主相机镜头相同的传感器。然而，这一功能也可以在设置中停用。

在最好的情况下，Find X5 Pro可以以每秒60帧的速度进行超高清视频录制，但AI高光视频功能在HFR格式下无法使用。放大或缩小的设计很好，通过无级控制机制实现。拍摄时，这款智能手机出色的图像稳定功能给人留下了特别积极的印象。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera Hauptkamera Ultraweitwinkel 5-facher Zoom Low-Light

click to load images

Oppo Find X5 Pro

Apple iPhone 13 Pro

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Oppo Find X5 Pro

Apple iPhone 13 Pro

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Oppo Find X5 Pro

Apple iPhone 13 Pro

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Oppo Find X5 Pro

Apple iPhone 13 Pro

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Oppo Find X5 Pro

Apple iPhone 13 Pro

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra

Canon EOS 90D

在受控的照明条件下，Oppo Find X5 Pro非常准确地映射了我们的测试图，只在边缘部分出现了微弱的失真。在图像的中心，白平衡再次过冷。

在拍摄ColorChecker时，我们无法发现这个问题。恰恰相反，特别是红色和皮肤色调匹配得很好，对所有其他颜色的描绘都很真实。

配件和保修 - 包括SuperVOOC电源

Oppo Find X5 Pro附带一个模块化电源（最大80瓦，USB-A），一条USB线（Type-A到Type-C），一个硅胶保险套，一个SIM卡针和一个OTG适配器。

制造商在德国为这款智能手机提供24个月的保修。

输入设备和操作 - 带有光学指纹传感器的Oppo智能手机

Oppo Find X5 Pro有一个电容式触摸屏，可以同时检测多达10个触摸，并以240赫兹的采样率运行。在它上面实现了快速而可靠的输入。正如所交付的那样，显示屏上有一层保护膜，这在一定程度上抑制了在屏幕表面的滑行，而且对玻璃的切割也相当明显。

光学指纹传感器可靠地检测到存储的指纹，并以吸引人的速度解锁Find X5 Pro。另外，也可以选择更快，但也不安全的2D人脸识别。

我们对振动机制印象特别深刻，它的反馈安静而迅捷。除了单手手势导航外，还有其他一些可供选择的屏幕控制功能和手势模式。

显示屏 - Find X5 Pro有一个精确的LTPO OLED屏幕

Oppo Find X5 Pro的6.7英寸（17.02厘米）AMOLED显示屏与前代产品几乎没有任何区别。它使用高达120Hz的自适应刷新率，Oppo声称可以降低到10Hz。当系统将刷新率降低到低至1Hz时，我们感到意外但积极的惊喜。

当环境光传感器打开时，屏幕的亮度非常好，但竞争对手，如Galaxy S22 Ultra或小米12 Pro在这方面做得明显更好。考虑到光线和黑暗表面的均匀分布（APL50），OLED的亮度略高，达到816cd/m2。然而，宣传的1,300cd/m2甚至无法从这款智能手机中得到满足。

OLED的闪烁在179.7和361赫兹之间不规则地摆动。除了在可调的98%亮度设置以上的情况下，我们无法记录任何其他恒定的120Hz。


755 cd/m²	747 cd/m²	743 cd/m²
736 cd/m²	746 cd/m²	742 cd/m²
736 cd/m²	743 cd/m²	750 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 755 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 744.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2.11 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 746 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
98.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23

	Oppo Find X5 Pro AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.70	Oppo Find X3 Pro AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.70	Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Dynamic AMOLED, 3088x1440, 6.80	Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max OLED, 2778x1284, 6.70	Xiaomi 12 Pro AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.73	Motorola Edge 30 Pro AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.70
Screen		0%	9%	23%	-13%	-13%
Brightness middle	746	759 2%	1077 44%	1049 41%	959 29%	649 -13%
Brightness	744	776 4%	1093 47%	1060 42%	977 31%	649 -13%
Brightness Distribution	97	94 -3%	97 0%	98 1%	96 -1%	98 1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	0.9	0.8 11%	1.2 -33%	0.78 13%	1.1 -22%	1.18 -31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	1.6	1.8 -13%	2 -25%	1.72 -8%	3.1 -94%	2.07 -29%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.6	1.6 -0%	1.3 19%	0.8 50%	1.9 -19%	1.5 6%
Gamma	2.23 ^99%	2.23 ^99%	2.37 ^93%	2.181 ^101%	2.22 ^99%	2.236 ^98%
CCT	6499 ^100%	6512 ^100%	6526 ^100%	6559 ^99%	6498 ^100%	2538 ^256%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

361 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 361 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 361 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17933 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

用固定变焦水平和不同的亮度设置进行测量（Rigol MSO5102）。

当使用自然设置时，屏幕的色彩渲染非常接近真实生活。而且，如果你努力手动调整白平衡设置（见屏幕截图），最终你将在屏幕上获得近乎完美的色彩和灰度渲染。而为了实现这一点，只使用了较小的sRGB色彩空间模型。

如果你想要更大的DCI-P3光谱所提供的更深的颜色，你需要选择鲜艳模式。但与此同时，你也需要喜欢更强烈的饱和色彩和更冷的图像。后者可以通过自然色彩显示设置进行补偿，使色温与环境照明保持一致。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.389 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.793 ms rise
1.389 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.597 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.711 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.364 ms rise
0.711 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.348 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms).

在户外，Oppo Find X5给人留下了积极的印象。它可以聚集足够的亮度储备，以应对大多数照明条件。然而，如果能在显示屏上减少反射，那就更好了。

OPPO Find X5 Pro的镜头视角可以预见，非常好。只有在非常狭窄的视角下，人们才会注意到亮度的轻微降低。然而，只要稍微向下倾斜，就会产生绿色光晕效应。

性能 - 骁龙8代，而不是Dimensity 9000

欧洲版的Oppo Find X Pro完全基于高通芯片组和骁龙8代。然而，在其原产国中国，有第二个版本，使用联发科Dimensity 9000。后者声称拥有额外的12GB LPDDR5内存。

移动基准测试显示，Oppo的这款机型落后于竞争对手。这表明SoC芯片组的冷却效果不理想，因为在日常使用中，正常的导航是很顺畅的。

虽然CPU性能位于预期范围内，但AI基准测试的结果却出乎意料地差。然而，Procyon人工智能基准测试显示，与其他配备骁龙8处理器的智能手机相比，结果稍好。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	1742 Points +39%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1257 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (1181 - 1298, n=21)	1231 Points -2%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1195 Points -5%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1192 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	1154 Points -8%
Oppo Find X3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288	1123 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 2138, n=215, last 2 years)	915 Points -27%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	4914 Points +41%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	3738 Points +7%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	3659 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	3560 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (3269 - 3839, n=21)	3548 Points +2%
Oppo Find X3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288	3535 Points +1%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	3488 Points
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6681, n=215, last 2 years)	2998 Points -14%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	13611 Points +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (10140 - 17025, n=21)	13216 Points +9%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	13131 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	12579 Points +4%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	12144 Points
Average of class Smartphone (4761 - 21385, n=210, last 2 years)	11754 Points -3%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	970465 Points +13%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	962824 Points +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (692924 - 1041980, n=18)	928953 Points +8%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	856953 Points
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	800222 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (102602 - 1650926, n=152, last 2 years)	739951 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	704479 Points -18%

CrossMark - Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (749 - 1169, n=14)	993 Points +4%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	956 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	942 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (200 - 1474, n=163, last 2 years)	836 Points -13%
Oppo Find X3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288	829 Points -13%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	811 Points -15%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	8124 Points +19%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	7070 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (6007 - 7665, n=15)	6951 Points +2%
Oppo Find X3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288	6822 Points 0%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	6799 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	6319 Points -7%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	6007 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=164, last 2 years)	5753 Points -15%
System
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	19657 Points +90%
Oppo Find X3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288	11438 Points +11%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	10739 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	10464 Points +1%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	10340 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (9273 - 11338, n=15)	10312 Points 0%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	10006 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=164, last 2 years)	9684 Points -6%
Memory
Oppo Find X3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288	8220 Points +26%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	7357 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (5125 - 8906, n=15)	6787 Points +4%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	6523 Points
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=164, last 2 years)	6262 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	6212 Points -5%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	5125 Points -21%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	3612 Points -45%
Graphics
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	25642 Points +17%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	21944 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (15216 - 22308, n=15)	20338 Points -7%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	17159 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	17104 Points -22%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	15216 Points -31%
Oppo Find X3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288	14211 Points -35%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=164, last 2 years)	14144 Points -36%
Web
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	2392 Points +66%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1843 Points +28%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1669 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (1291 - 1888, n=15)	1659 Points +15%
Oppo Find X3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288	1621 Points +12%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=164, last 2 years)	1495 Points +4%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1444 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	1434 Points -1%

AImark - Score v2.x
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	107460 Points +1696%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	72572 Points +1113%
Average of class Smartphone (1043 - 139804, n=50, last 2 years)	21146 Points +253%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (1046 - 96317, n=14)	17097 Points +186%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	6217 Points +4%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	5982 Points

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (61568 - 81722, n=8)	72917 Points +6%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	68880 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	63613 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (207 - 84787, n=148, last 2 years)	21967 Points -68%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	10841 Points -84%

在GPU基准测试中，Adreno 730的性能很高，正如预期。然而，在其他一些GFX基准测试中，结果仍然低于图形处理器的潜在性能。这是冷却系统不足的一个早期迹象。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	2817 Points +12%
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2549 Points +1%
Realme GT 2 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2545 Points +1%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2523 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2513 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1916 Points -24%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1567 Points -38%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	3080 Points +20%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2609 Points +1%
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2604 Points +1%
Realme GT 2 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2594 Points +1%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2575 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2044 Points -21%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1629 Points -37%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	11688 Points +15%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10384 Points +2%
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10185 Points 0%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10175 Points
Realme GT 2 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10164 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7288 Points -28%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6483 Points -36%
Oppo Find X3 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5721 Points -44%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10062 Points +2%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9927 Points +1%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9826 Points
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	9680 Points -1%
Realme GT 2 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9571 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7236 Points -26%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6351 Points -35%
Oppo Find X3 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5657 Points -42%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11528 Points +15%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10005 Points
Oppo Find X3 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9540 Points -5%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9149 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8612 Points -14%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	5782 Points -42%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	19364 Points +7%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	18090 Points
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	16202 Points -10%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	13950 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	12972 Points -28%
Oppo Find X3 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	12394 Points -31%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Oppo Find X3 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5283 Points +35%
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4771 Points +22%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4150 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3957 Points +1%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3902 Points
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	1902 Points -51%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	13121 Points +8%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	12123 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10958 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10415 Points -14%
Oppo Find X3 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8768 Points -28%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	25906 Points +2%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	25285 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	20842 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	18689 Points -26%
Oppo Find X3 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	13647 Points -46%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4811 Points +12%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4296 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4120 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4085 Points -5%
Oppo Find X3 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3895 Points -9%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps +102%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps +98%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	118 fps +97%
Oppo Find X3 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps 0%
Realme GT 2 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	425 fps +12%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	409.6 fps +8%
Realme GT 2 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	380 fps 0%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	380 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	306 fps -19%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	302 fps -21%
Oppo Find X3 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	230 fps -39%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps +98%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	117 fps +95%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	108 fps +80%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps 0%
Realme GT 2 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps
Oppo Find X3 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	55 fps -8%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	251 fps +39%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	227.9 fps +26%
Realme GT 2 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	194 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	187 fps +3%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	181 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	158 fps -13%
Oppo Find X3 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	127 fps -30%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	109 fps +95%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	87 fps +55%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	71 fps +27%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps +7%
Realme GT 2 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps +7%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56 fps
Oppo Find X3 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	36 fps -36%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	169 fps +52%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	144 fps +30%
Realme GT 2 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	143 fps +29%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	127 fps +14%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps +7%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	111 fps
Oppo Find X3 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	93 fps -16%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	68 fps +74%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	53.2 fps +36%
Realme GT 2 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	42 fps +8%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39 fps 0%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39 fps
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	36 fps -8%
Oppo Find X3 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	28 fps -28%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	92.9 fps +47%
Realme GT 2 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	86 fps +37%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	86 fps +37%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	71 fps +13%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	68 fps +8%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	63 fps
Oppo Find X3 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	55 fps -13%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps +67%
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps +67%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	54.8 fps +52%
Realme GT 2 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	37 fps +3%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	36 fps
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	31 fps -14%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	27 fps -25%
Oppo Find X3 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	25 fps -31%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	47 fps +18%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	42 fps +5%
Realme GT 2 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	41 fps +3%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	40 fps
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	37.9 fps -5%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	34 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	30 fps -25%
Oppo Find X3 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	28 fps -30%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	98 fps +85%
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	89 fps +68%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	59.1 fps +12%
Realme GT 2 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53 fps 0%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53 fps
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	42 fps -21%
Oppo Find X3 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	38 fps -28%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	123 fps +31%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	108 fps +15%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	101 fps +7%
Realme GT 2 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	100 fps +6%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	94 fps
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	92 fps -2%
Oppo Find X3 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	72 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	68 fps -28%

Oppo Find X5 Pro的浏览器性能令人印象深刻。在同类竞争对手中，它更多地处于中间位置，但我们认为，在日常使用中不太可能注意到这一点。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)	181.8 Points +77%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99)	121.6 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (72.8 - 134.6, n=16)	107.9 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=171, last 2 years)	105.8 Points +3%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)	103 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)	96.8 Points -6%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)	84.1 Points -18%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)	402.9 Points +133%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99)	236.6 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)	200 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (121.9 - 237, n=11)	195.6 Points +13%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)	172.8 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)	147.5 Points -15%
Oppo Find X3 Pro (Chrome 89)	139.4 Points -19%
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	104.3 Points -40%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)	242 runs/min +133%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chome 99)	129 runs/min +24%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)	108 runs/min +4%
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=156, last 2 years)	107.2 runs/min +3%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)	104 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (64.4 - 129.3, n=16)	104 runs/min 0%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)	73.5 runs/min -29%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)	248 Points +86%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99)	167 Points +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (79 - 193, n=15)	142.9 Points +7%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)	133 Points
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=121, last 2 years)	133 Points 0%
Oppo Find X3 Pro (Chrome 89)	129 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)	124 Points -7%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)	119 Points -11%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)	63831 Points +66%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99)	50626 Points +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (27730 - 50626, n=17)	42391 Points +10%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)	38407 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)	34055 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=209, last 2 years)	33561 Points -13%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)	29750 Points -23%
Oppo Find X3 Pro (Chrome 89)	27914 Points -27%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Oppo Find X3 Pro (Chrome 89)	1646 ms * -46%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=171, last 2 years)	1602 ms * -42%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)	1330 ms * -18%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)	1259 ms * -12%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)	1125 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (814 - 1440, n=16)	1010 ms * +10%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99)	819 ms * +27%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)	414.8 ms * +63%

* ... smaller is better

这款Oppo智能手机建立在快速的UFS 3.1存储上，但与竞争对手相比，它的RAM写入速度较慢，就像它的前辈一样。

	Oppo Find X5 Pro	Oppo Find X3 Pro	Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G	Xiaomi 12 Pro	Motorola Edge 30 Pro	Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		22%	36%	67%	39%	38%	24%
Sequential Read 256KB	1410	1779 26%	1653 17%	1620 15%	1832 30%	1760 ?(1004 - 2037, n=87) 25%	1509 ?(226 - 4512, n=214, last 2 years) 7%
Sequential Write 256KB	894	759 -15%	1074 20%	1465 64%	1028 15%	1134 ?(452 - 1873, n=87) 27%	1116 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=214, last 2 years) 25%
Random Read 4KB	183.7	273.3 49%	322.3 75%	324.9 77%	277.7 51%	281 ?(173.5 - 543, n=87) 53%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=214, last 2 years) 34%
Random Write 4KB	210.4	267.1 27%	273.1 30%	448.9 113%	339.5 61%	311 ?(197.5 - 499, n=88) 48%	272 ?(13 - 709, n=214, last 2 years) 29%

游戏--很少超过60FPS

凭借Adreno 730，Oppo Find X5 Pro带来了一个非常强大的图形解决方案，使所有来自Google Play商店的应用程序可以使用最高清晰度播放，没有任何问题。我们用GameBench验证了这一点。

PUBG可以使用最高清晰度水平，以恒定的40 FPS运行。如果你把它降低到高清，你会得到高达60 FPS。然而，我们注意到，随着游戏时间的延长，性能会略有下降。我们用《使命召唤》测试了这一点。事实证明，高帧率（HFR）游戏可以限制在60 FPS，尽管它们名义上支持90甚至120 FPS。荒野大镖客》就是这种情况，还有其他游戏。

Oppo Find X5 Pro; Call of Duty Mobile; low; 1.0.30: Ø54.7 (54-56)

Oppo Find X5 Pro; Call of Duty Mobile; high; 1.0.30: Ø55.9 (9-61)

Oppo Find X5 Pro; Call of Duty Mobile; very high; 1.0.30: Ø56.6 (53-61)

Oppo Find X5 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 1.9.0: Ø56.5 (50-58)

Oppo Find X5 Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.9.0: Ø57.9 (53-61)

Oppo Find X5 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 1.9.0: Ø39.9 (39-41)

环境--Oppo无法获得对Snapdragon 8的掌控权

温度

在任何时候，Oppo Find X5 Pro的表面温度都没有变得令人不快，即使在负载下，它也只是成片地变热。

压力测试就不那么轻松了。新的蒸气室散热器并没有获得对骁龙8代的掌握，而且经过一段时间，性能降低了约37%。这很烦人，但这是大多数制造商正在努力解决的问题。RedMagic 7在这个部门表现最好，但它也依赖主动冷却。

Max. Load

Idle


35.7 °C	35.9 °C	33.8 °C
35.9 °C	34.3 °C	33.9 °C
36.1 °C	35.6 °C	32.7 °C

Maximum: 36.1 °C
Average: 34.9 °C


33 °C	33.8 °C	33.3 °C
31.7 °C	32.8 °C	34.1 °C
30.6 °C	32.4 °C	34 °C

Maximum: 34.1 °C
Average: 32.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 27.3 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	80.1 (44.5^min) % +28%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	62.7 (37.2^min) %
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	58.5 (25.9^min) % -7%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	57.4 (34.3^min) % -8%
Oppo Find X3 Pro Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56 (3164^min) % -11%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	47.2 (27.4^min) % -25%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	77 (12.3^min) % +23%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	62.7 (9.64^min) %
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	61.8 (7.76^min) % -1%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59.6 (9.21^min) % -5%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	% -100%

Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø10.9 (9.64-15.4)

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.1 (12.3-16)

Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø10.9 (9.21-15.5)

Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø41.7 (37.2-59.4)

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø47 (44.5-55.5)

Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø38.6 (34.3-59.7)

Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø43.7 (38.1-60.9)

发言人

Oppo Find X5 Pro的两个扬声器可以非常响亮地播放，但听起来可能有点空洞，在无声的序列中可以听到噪音。然而，在较低的音量下，声音轮廓相当均匀，可以说是相当引人注目的。只是低音调的声音有些微弱。

可以通过USB端口连接一个插孔适配器来进行声音输出，但要使其发挥作用，你需要先在设置中激活。无线蓝牙5.2可以使用所有常见的音频编解码器（SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX自适应、aptX TWS 、LHDC和LDAC）。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Oppo Find X5 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命--Find X5 Pro 5G提供出色的运行时间

消耗功率

尽管Find X5 Pro可以将刷新率降至1赫兹，但在显示屏亮度最低的情况下，能耗却出奇地高。更重要的是，它在闲置时继续消耗正常的电力。在负载情况下，能耗很低，但这主要是由于SoC的节流，GFXBench在调整亮度（150cd/m²）水平下很好地说明了这一点。

OPPO智能手机在有线充电时可以达到80瓦，并在12分钟内达到50%的水平。无线充电的功率最高为50瓦。制造商的规格说明，用AirVOOC充电器给电池充满电应该只需要47分钟。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.05 / 0.31 Watt
Idle	1.24 / 1.39 / 1.42 Watt
Load	3.58 / 6.99 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Oppo Find X5 Pro 5000 mAh	Oppo Find X3 Pro 4500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G 5000 mAh	Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 4352 mAh	Xiaomi 12 Pro 4600 mAh	Motorola Edge 30 Pro 4800 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-24%	-8%	13%	-7%	-36%	-36%	-13%
Idle Minimum *	1.24	0.93 25%	0.58 53%	0.6 52%	0.94 24%	1.2 3%	1.255 ?(0.7 - 3.18, n=15) -1%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) 28%
Idle Average *	1.39	1.54 -11%	0.71 49%	1.5 -8%	1.24 11%	1.6 -15%	2.02 ?(1.04 - 4.38, n=15) -45%	1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) -4%
Idle Maximum *	1.42	1.69 -19%	1.16 18%	1.6 -13%	1.34 6%	2.5 -76%	2.21 ?(1.15 - 4.45, n=15) -56%	1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) -15%
Load Average *	3.58	6.38 -78%	7.07 -97%	3.5 2%	5.7 -59%	5.2 -45%	5.49 ?(3.58 - 8.04, n=15) -53%	5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) -55%
Load Maximum *	6.99	9.58 -37%	11.32 -62%	4.8 31%	8.12 -16%	10.4 -49%	8.75 ?(6.67 - 11.3, n=15) -25%	8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) -19%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1: Ø5.27 (0.963-10.9)

Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1: Ø6.81 (1.309-12.9)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.58 (7.9-10.8)

Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.78 (6.94-8.13)

Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.933 (0.856-1.058)

Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.977 (0.881-1.647)

电池寿命

Oppo Find X5 Pro使用两块串联的2500毫安时电池，这使它能够提供出色的电池寿命，只是在读取测试（空闲）中，显示亮度最小的运行时间很短。

这方面的迹象已经在早期的测试测量中被发现了。根据我们的观察，Find X5 Pro始终在1和120赫兹之间交替运行。由于在阅读稿中出现了大量的滚动，这个过程可能比竞争对手使用的过程更耗费能量。例如，小米12 Pro迅速切换到60赫兹，但更低的帧率在再过几秒钟后才会部署。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		21h 9min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 98)		13h 08min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		19h 02min
Load (maximum brightness)		6h 07min

	Oppo Find X5 Pro 5000 mAh	Oppo Find X3 Pro 4500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G 5000 mAh	Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 4352 mAh	Xiaomi 12 Pro 4600 mAh	Motorola Edge 30 Pro 4800 mAh
Battery Runtime		-4%	17%	54%	5%	8%
Reader / Idle	1269		1973 55%	2846 124%	2036 60%	1985 56%
H.264	1142		1078 -6%	1522 33%	788 -31%	1006 -12%
WiFi v1.3	788	757 -4%	844 7%	1067 35%	766 -3%	816 4%
Load	367		410 12%	452 23%	337 -8%	306 -17%

Pros

+ 逼真的AMOLED显示屏

+ 快速的SoC

+ 广泛的频率范围

+ 伟大的相机设置

Cons

- 没有内存扩展

- 没有6GHz Wifi

- 只有单频GNSS

- 负载下的性能下降

判决书

通过Find X5 Pro 5G，Oppo已经成功地提供了一个主要基于其相机的强大旗舰智能手机。额外的图像处理器，即MariSilicon X，以及Oppo与哈苏的合作项目，都强调了这一点。然而，它让人强烈地联想到另一款智能手机，即OnePlus 10 Pro由步步高电子公司制造。

Find X5 Pro具备我们对高端智能手机的一切期待：带有自适应刷新率的完美显示屏，良好的相机设置，长电池寿命，非常快的充电，IP68认证和光滑的设计。但仍有改进的余地。

Oppo Find X5 Pro以其全面的整体包装让人信服。但它也在一些特定领域显示出一些弱点。

我们的测试表明，Oppo智能手机的GPS既有些迟钝，也可以更准确。我们很怀念对Wi-Fi 6E的支持，此外，在这个价格范围内，应该包括一个超声波指纹传感器的事实。此外，我们的测试表明，屏幕的亮度比宣传的要低。

Find X5 Pro的良好替代品是三星Galaxy S22 Ultra以及小米12 Pro.对于更注重价格的买家来说，Edge 30 Pro也可能是一个令人兴奋的选择。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

Oppo Find X5 Pro的建议零售价为1049英镑/1299欧元。在所有知名的零售商，如亚马逊、数码港、MediaMarkt和Coolblue，它可能会以更低的价格提供。

Oppo Find X5 Pro - 2022-08-30 08/30/2022 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis

93%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

95%

Connectivity

66 / 70 → 94%

Weight

88%

Battery

90%

Display

93%

Games Performance

57 / 64 → 90%

Application Performance

84 / 86 → 97%

Temperature

92%

Noise

100%

Audio

78 / 90 → 86%

Camera

80%

Average

83%

89%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: John Stroh - Translator - 9 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 386552 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Oppo Find X5 Pro评测--配备哈苏相机的时尚智能手机

Daniel Schmidt, 2022-04- 6 (Update: 2022-04- 6)

Oppo Find X5 Pro评测--配备哈苏相机的时尚智能手机

潜在的竞争对手比较

设计--一件由玻璃和陶瓷制成的高贵的服装

尺寸比较

特点 - 没有惊喜

软件 - FinX5 Pro,Android 12和ColorOS 12.1

通信和GNSS - 追踪效果一般，没有Wi-Fi 6E

功能和语音质量

摄像机 - 从四台到三台

配件和保修 - 包括SuperVOOC电源

输入设备和操作 - 带有光学指纹传感器的Oppo智能手机

显示屏 - Find X5 Pro有一个精确的LTPO OLED屏幕

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 骁龙8代，而不是Dimensity 9000

游戏--很少超过60FPS

环境--Oppo无法获得对Snapdragon 8的掌控权

温度

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

发言人

Oppo Find X5 Pro audio analysis

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max audio analysis

电池寿命--Find X5 Pro 5G提供出色的运行时间

消耗功率

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

判决书

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare