Notebookcheck Logo

三星Galaxy A33 5G评论。几乎在每个方面都比前代产品好

成功模式。 通过其Galaxy A33 5G,三星已经发现并弥补了Galaxy A32 5G前辈的弱点。凭借90赫兹的AMOLED显示屏、更现代的SoC和防水外壳,这款中档智能手机甚至危险地接近于匹配Galaxy A53 5G。
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

三星正在重新推出其成功的Galaxy A系列的智能手机。由于需求量大,Galaxy A智能手机在过去几年中只是缓慢发展,所以为什么要改变一个成功的公式?然而,今年的情况有些不同,正如我们的Galaxy A33 5G评测样本所示。

Galaxy A33 5G包含了一些比其 Galaxy A32 5G前身的一些改进。除了外形尺寸稍小(现在是6.4英寸而不是6.5英寸),最大的变化是屏幕。使用的不是低对比度的TFT-LCD,而是AMOLED屏幕。一个更现代的SoC和IP67认证也被加入进来。

Samsung Galaxy A33 5G (Galaxy A Series)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 1280 8 x 2 - 2.4 GHz
Graphics adapter
Memory
6 GB 
Display
6.40 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 411 PPI, capacitive, Super AMOLED, FHD+, HDR10, 16M colors, glossy: yes, HDR, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 98.4 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Gyro Sensor, Geomagnetic Sensor, Hall Sensor, Virtual Proximity Sensing, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Limited, Wi-Fi Direct, Samsung Smart Switch
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (B1, B2, B4, B5, B8), 4G (B1, ​B2, ​B3, ​B4, ​B5, ​B7, ​B8, ​B12, ​B17, ​B20, ​B26, ​B28, ​B32, ​B38, ​B40, ​B41, ​B66), 5G (N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N28, N38, N40, N41, N66, N78), Head SAR 0.574 W/kg, Body SAR 1-59 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.1 x 159.7 x 74
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (f/1.8, 26mm, 0.8µm, OIS) + 8MP (f/2.2, 1/4.0", 1.12µm) + 5MP (f/2.4) + 2MP (f/2.4), videos up to 4K [email protected]
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.2, 1.12µm, videos up to 4K [email protected]
Additional features
Speakers: dual, Keyboard: Virtual, USB cable, SIM tool, Quick Start Guide, Warranty Information, One UI 4.1, 24 Months Warranty, fanless, waterproof
Weight
186 g
Price
369 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
83.2 %
07/2022
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4
186 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.40"2400x1080
85.3 %
02/2022
Motorola Moto G200 5G
SD 888+ 5G, Adreno 660
202 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"2460x1080
77.7 %
06/2022
Oppo A76
SD 680, Adreno 610
189 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.56"1612x720
79.3 %
03/2021
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3
205 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"1600x720
83.4 %
06/2022
Samsung Galaxy A53
Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4
189 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
80.5 %
01/2022
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2
195 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2400x1080

外壳。具有良好触觉效果的塑料机箱

在外壳方面,三星Galaxy A33 5G类似于 Galaxy A32 5G几乎到了最后的细节,除了外形因素不同。买家仍然得到一个高质量和稳定的塑料机箱,其正面由大猩猩5号玻璃保护。自拍相机嵌在一个水滴形的凹槽里。

Galaxy A33 5G的正面和背面有白色、黑色、浅蓝色和鲜艳的桃红色,由光滑的光亮边框固定在一起。哑光后盖略带橡胶,这使得智能手机的使用感觉非常好。重量达到了186克。

虽然与Galaxy A32 5G相比,背面的4个镜头的排列没有变化,但设计却不同。相机模块不再平放在外壳中,而是明显向外突出,边缘与后盖平滑地融合在一起。另一个新功能是IP67防尘防水认证。

尺寸比较

168.1 mm 75.5 mm 8.9 mm 202 g164.2 mm 76.1 mm 9.1 mm 205 g164.4 mm 75.7 mm 8.4 mm 189 g163.56 mm 75.78 mm 8.75 mm 195 g159.7 mm 74 mm 8.1 mm 186 g159.6 mm 74.8 mm 8.1 mm 189 g

设备。 Galaxy A33 5G,无音频插孔

三星只提供一种配置的Galaxy A33 5G。6GB内存和128GB UFS 2.2存储,价格约为270美元。在全新或出厂状态下,实际存储空间达98GB。

三星已经取消了前代产品的3.5毫米插孔,因此有线音频设备只能通过USB-C适配器使用。除了NFC,这款智能手机还包含蓝牙5.1,因此是一个稍稍更新的无线通信标准版本(Galaxy A32 5G:支持OTG的USB-C端口以USB 2.0的速度工作。

Galaxy A33 5G支持DRM Widevine L1,但Camera2 API的支持级别仅为 "有限"。因此,安装的第三方相机应用程序对相机功能的访问是有限的。

左边:没有连接
左边:没有连接
右:功能键,音量摇杆
右:功能键,音量摇杆
顶部:麦克风、microSD/NanoSIM插槽
顶部:麦克风、microSD/NanoSIM插槽
底部:麦克风、USB-C 2.0、扬声器
底部:麦克风、USB-C 2.0、扬声器

微型SD卡阅读器

microSD/SIM卡插槽可以容纳一张microSD卡和一张nano-SIM卡或两张nano-SIM卡。使用我们的Angelbird AV Pro V60 microSD参考卡,Galaxy A33 5G实现了坚实的读写性能率,总体上略高于 Galaxy A32 5G.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
59.21 MB/s ∼100%
Oppo A76
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
25.6 MB/s ∼43% -57%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
15.47 MB/s ∼26% -74%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
10.9 MB/s ∼18% -82%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø43.7 (29-56.7)
Oppo A76 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.7 (29.6-50.5)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø46.2 (35.3-62.3)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø32 (25-46.5)
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø83.8 (43.5-112.8)
Oppo A76 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.8 (36.1-83.9)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø83.9 (56.1-108.6)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø75.5 (58.6-78.9)

软件。保证五年的更新

三星为Galaxy A33 5G配备了Android 12和其内部的One UI 4.1用户界面。在审查时(6月底),Android 安全补丁仍然是从4月1日开始的,因此还不是完全最新的。

除了必须的谷歌应用程序和一系列专有应用程序外,只有少数第三方应用程序,如Facebook、TikTok和Spotify被预装。除了微软的OneDrive之外,所有这些都可以被卸载。

三星正在关注其目前这一代智能手机和平板电脑的寿命,承诺将有多达四代的Android 操作系统升级,以及五年的安全更新。目前在Android 领域没有其他制造商提供更多。

通信与GNSS:Galaxy A33 5G,具有良好的定位功能

三星的Galaxy A33 5G拥有17个4G频段和12个5G频段,提供了良好的移动覆盖,所以接收问题应该几乎不会发生。

该智能手机在本地网络中通过WiFi 5进行通信,但没有利用MIMO天线技术来加快数据传输速度。因此,用我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器确定的WLAN传输率并不完全令人振奋。然而,它们完全在WiFi 5的预期范围内,并且在发送和接收方向都非常稳定。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (44.3 - 1736, n=116, last 2 years)
608 MBit/s ∼100% +77%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
345 (328min - 351max) MBit/s ∼57% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
343 (337min - 348max) MBit/s ∼56%
Oppo A76
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
282 (186min - 332max) MBit/s ∼46% -18%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (57.7 - 1710, n=118, last 2 years)
657 MBit/s ∼100% +145%
Oppo A76
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
311 (181min - 368max) MBit/s ∼47% +16%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
269 (255min - 281max) MBit/s ∼41% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
268 (133min - 280max) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 transmit AX12
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
864 (759min - 906max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1368, n=145, last 2 years)
488 MBit/s ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
346 (324min - 360max) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 receive AX12
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
836 (809min - 863max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 953, n=146, last 2 years)
461 MBit/s ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
366 (347min - 374max) MBit/s ∼44%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø342 (337-348)
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø263 (133-280)
室内的GPS接收
室内的GPS接收
室外的GPS接收
室外的GPS接收

Galaxy A33 5G的定位是通过GPS(L1)、Galileo(E1)、Glonass(L1)、Beidou(B1)和QZSS进行的,室内精度可达4米,室外可达3米。

Galaxy A33 5G在日常使用中也能提供相当准确的定位数据。与Garmin Venu 2相比,它几乎同样精确地记录了我们大约10公里的自行车路程。

GPS测试:总结
GPS测试:总结
GPS测试:环湖航行
GPS测试:环湖航行
GPS测试:循环
GPS测试:循环

电话和语音质量:混合双卡

Galaxy A33 5G提供坚实的语音质量,可以相当有效地抑制嘈杂的环境噪音。通过扬声器进行通信的效果也相当好。然而,当我们离麦克风更远时,声音就会变得有点模糊不清。当我们小声说话时也会发生同样的情况。

两张nano-SIM卡或一张nano-SIM卡和一张microSD卡都可以放入智能手机的混合插槽。支持VoLTE和WLAN通话。

照相机:4800万像素四摄像头,带OIS

用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照

在官方规格方面,三星Galaxy A33 5G的相机设备与Galaxy A32 5G几乎相同,但4800万像素的主摄像头现在有一个光学图像稳定器,使拍照更容易。后盖上的其余镜头被一个800万像素的超广角摄像头(F2.2)、一个500万像素的微距摄像头(F2.4)和一个200万像素的深度摄像头(F.2.4)占据。

主摄像头(F1.8,自动对焦,OIS)在标准模式下通过像素分选拍摄12MP照片。在白天,照片很好,很详细,但在边缘失去了一些锐利度,并且在放大时被图像伪影所扭曲。激活夜间模式可以在低光照条件下提供体面的照片,但黑暗区域可以使用更多的照明。总的来说,只要你满足于三星智能手机典型的强烈色彩,图像质量在中端条件下是绝对没问题的。

其余的摄像头设置在某种程度上落后于主摄像头。用超广角摄像头拍摄的图像在边缘处明显失真,放大后很快就会出现像素化。200万像素的微距相机在3至5厘米的对焦范围内工作,可以拍出有趣的照片,但由于分辨率低,它们不是那么详细。

自拍相机的分辨率为1300万像素,提供坚实的图像质量,并在人像模式下产生体面的模糊效果。与主摄像头一样,它可以以30 FPS的速度录制4K UHD视频。然而,在这两种情况下,视频稳定功能只能在30FPS的情况下达到1080P,就像在录制过程中在主摄像头和超广角摄像头之间切换一样。

用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用超广角相机拍照
用超广角相机拍照
用自拍相机拍照
用自拍相机拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Tageslicht-Aufnahme 1Tageslicht-Aufnahme 2Ultraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLowlight-Aufnahme
click to load images

除了绿色调的偏差外,Galaxy A33 5G在实验室条件下能够相当准确地再现色彩,但只能在图像中心清晰地再现测试图。另一方面,在1勒克斯的余光下,即使只有轮廓,也能识别出来。

ColorChecker
17.6 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
11 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
4 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A33 5G: 9.23 ∆E min: 1.52 - max: 24.44 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
49.6 ∆E
37.9 ∆E
34.6 ∆E
43.4 ∆E
58.9 ∆E
49.9 ∆E
33.2 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
60.1 ∆E
61.5 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
45.8 ∆E
33.8 ∆E
71.8 ∆E
41.4 ∆E
41.8 ∆E
76.2 ∆E
67.9 ∆E
50.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A33 5G: 44.2 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 76.18 ∆E

配件和保修。不包括电源

正如三星Galaxy A33 5G的超薄包装所显示的,电源适配器不包括在交货范围内。买家会收到一条USB线(A型到C型)、一个SIM卡工具、一份快速入门指南和一份保修信息传单。其他配件,如25瓦的电源适配器,可以在三星商店购买。

Galaxy A33 5G在德国有24个月的保修期。这在其他国家和其他地区可能有所不同,所以在购买前一定要向你的供应商查询。不像 Galaxy A53 5G,三星Care+保险不适用于该智能手机。

输入设备和操作 - 光学指纹传感器

得益于90赫兹刷新率的精确触摸屏,三星Galaxy A33 5G使用起来舒适而流畅。然而,尽管有6GB的内存,但在启动时和同时打开许多应用程序时,会出现延迟或小的停顿。总而言之,这并不那么令人讨厌,但它清楚地表明,该智能手机没有最快的SoC。

Galaxy A33 5G可以通过集成在显示屏上的光学指纹传感器快速、可靠地解锁。第二种生物识别认证方法是二维脸部扫描,即使在环境光线不足的情况下,也能表现出很高的识别率,但不像指纹方法那样安全。

纵向模式下的键盘
纵向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘

显示屏。明亮的AMOLED屏幕

子像素网格
子像素网格

在显示方面,Galaxy A33 5G与它的前辈相比有了很大的飞跃。虽然 Galaxy A32 5G不得不使用低分辨率的TFT-LCD屏幕和60赫兹的帧率,而三星在继任者身上翻转了局面。

Galaxy A33 5G提供了一个明亮的90 Hz AMOLED屏幕,分辨率为2400 x 1080,与其6.5英寸的Galaxy A姐妹机型相同。 Galaxy A53 5G.这也为我们的6.4英寸评测样本提供了441PPI的高像素密度,这使得显示的内容漂亮而清晰。

平均而言,AMOLED面板实现了约695 cd/m²的亮度,这几乎与Galaxy A53 5G的屏幕一样亮。在均匀分布的亮区和暗区,我们甚至可以从屏幕上得到1092 cd/m²的亮度(APL18测量)。在没有亮度传感器的情况下,亮度下降到最高387 cd/m²。在最低的亮度设置下,屏幕仍然以2.2cd/m²的亮度闪耀,或者当你在Android "输入帮助 "下的设置中激活额外的调光时,则为1.82cd/m²。

AMOLED屏幕在178.1至366.2赫兹的范围内闪烁,这应该不会困扰大多数用户。在Android 设置中没有抵消PWM闪烁的直流调光模式。

689
cd/m²
691
cd/m²
695
cd/m²
691
cd/m²
693
cd/m²
697
cd/m²
695
cd/m²
699
cd/m²
701
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 701 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 694.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.82 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 693 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.2
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.5
98.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.14
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.40
Motorola Moto G200 5G
IPS LCD, 2460x1080, 6.80
Oppo A76
IPS, 1612x720, 6.56
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
TFT-LCD, 1600x720, 6.50
Samsung Galaxy A53
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
TFT-LCD, 2400x1080, 6.60
Screen
-81%
-24%
-145%
-16%
-84%
Brightness middle
693
512
-26%
569
-18%
543
-22%
718
4%
504
-27%
Brightness
695
488
-30%
562
-19%
512
-26%
730
5%
499
-28%
Brightness Distribution
98
87
-11%
90
-8%
85
-13%
92
-6%
91
-7%
Black Level *
0.36
0.5
0.63
0.72
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.3
3.42
-163%
2.16
-66%
4.9
-277%
1.62
-25%
3.3
-154%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.5
5.9
-69%
3.37
4%
8.6
-146%
4.21
-20%
6
-71%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.3
3.7
-185%
1.8
-38%
6.3
-385%
2
-54%
4.1
-215%
Gamma
2.14 103%
7154 0%
2.177 101%
2.23 99%
2.156 102%
2.28 96%
CCT
6530 100%
1.944 334362%
6784 96%
8120 80%
6545 99%
7041 92%
Contrast
1422
1138
862
700

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 366.2 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 366.2 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 366.2 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19590 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最低亮度
分钟。
25%的亮度
25%
50%的亮度
50%
75%的亮度
75%
最大手动亮度
100%

镜头下的画面是固定的放大镜和不一样的智能显示。

在预设的图片模式 "鲜艳 "中,Galaxy A33 5G在前景中发出了明亮的色彩表现,色彩的精确性只起到了从属作用。然而,颜色是否精确,很难用肉眼看出来。如果你切换到第二种图片模式 "自然",CalMAN给出的测量值也很好。最大Delta-E为1.3的色彩精确度属于理想范围,RGB平衡和色温也是如此。

色彩保真度(自然屏幕模式,sRGB目标色彩空间)
色彩保真度(自然屏幕模式,sRGB目标色彩空间)
色彩空间(自然屏幕模式,目标色彩空间sRGB)
色彩空间(自然屏幕模式,目标色彩空间sRGB)
灰度(自然屏幕模式,sRGB目标色彩空间)
灰度(自然屏幕模式,sRGB目标色彩空间)
色彩饱和度(屏幕模式自然,目标色彩空间sRGB)
色彩饱和度(屏幕模式自然,目标色彩空间sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.623 ms rise
↘ 0.627 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.303 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.627 ms rise
↘ 0.676 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.9 ms).

三星Galaxy A33 5G可以在户外很好地使用。然而,由于强烈的反射,屏幕内容在阳光直射下很难阅读。在阴凉处,显示屏没有任何瑕疵。

室外使用(阳光直射)。
室外使用(阳光直射)。
室外使用(在阴凉处)。
室外使用(在阴凉处)。

从所有的观察角度都能很好地识别内容。作为AMOLED的典型特征,可能会有轻微的绿色或黄色变色和/或亮度轻微下降,但这并不决定性地影响可读性。

视角
视角

性能。Exynos 1280,而不是联发科Dimensity 720

虽然 Galaxy A32 5G采用的是 联发科Dimensity 720而三星则使用自己的 Exynos 1280Galaxy A33 5G。这也使用8个核心,运行速度稍快,但与其他中端SoC相比,没有明显的优势。AImark的AI计算完全不看好Exynos 1280,因为它落后于其他大多数竞争对手--甚至联发科Dimensity 720在这里的得分也更好。

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1076 Points ∼100% +46%
realme 9 Pro Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 920, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
814 Points ∼76% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
740 Points ∼69% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280
  (736 - 740, n=3)
738 Points ∼69% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
737 Points ∼68%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1885, n=266, last 2 years)
737 Points ∼68% 0%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
598 Points ∼56% -19%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
472 Points ∼44% -36%
Oppo A76
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
384 Points ∼36% -48%
Multi-Core
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3286 Points ∼100% +72%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 5538, n=266, last 2 years)
2373 Points ∼72% +25%
realme 9 Pro Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 920, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
2046 Points ∼62% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1905 Points ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1878 Points ∼57% -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280
  (1826 - 1905, n=3)
1870 Points ∼57% -2%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1809 Points ∼55% -5%
Oppo A76
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1675 Points ∼51% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1511 Points ∼46% -21%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
794271 Points ∼100% +99%
Average of class Smartphone
  (111952 - 1119358, n=160, last 2 years)
584886 Points ∼74% +47%
realme 9 Pro Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 920, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
496444 Points ∼63% +24%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
409976 Points ∼52% +3%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280
  (398969 - 409976, n=2)
404473 Points ∼51% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
398969 Points ∼50%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
353908 Points ∼45% -11%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
18567 Points ∼100% +68%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
11470 Points ∼62% +4%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280
  (11077 - 11470, n=3)
11258 Points ∼61% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
11077 Points ∼60%
realme 9 Pro Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 920, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
10740 Points ∼58% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 19200, n=214, last 2 years)
10362 Points ∼56% -6%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
9402 Points ∼51% -15%
Oppo A76
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
6679 Points ∼36% -40%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5711 Points ∼100% +64%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 8753, n=179, last 2 years)
4625 Points ∼81% +33%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3626 Points ∼63% +4%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280
  (3477 - 3626, n=2)
3552 Points ∼62% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3477 Points ∼61%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3268 Points ∼57% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2735 Points ∼48% -21%
System
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
8546 Points ∼100% +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2083 - 19657, n=179, last 2 years)
8168 Points ∼96% +14%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
7184 Points ∼84%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280
  (7157 - 7184, n=2)
7171 Points ∼84% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
7157 Points ∼84% 0%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
6361 Points ∼74% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
4995 Points ∼58% -30%
Memory
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5648 Points ∼100% +48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 11617, n=179, last 2 years)
5204 Points ∼92% +36%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
4589 Points ∼81% +20%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3855 Points ∼68% +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280
  (3829 - 3855, n=2)
3842 Points ∼68% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3829 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3281 Points ∼58% -14%
Graphics
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
13865 Points ∼100% +172%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 26660, n=179, last 2 years)
8925 Points ∼64% +75%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
5178 Points ∼37% +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280
  (5104 - 5178, n=2)
5141 Points ∼37% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
5104 Points ∼37%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2929 Points ∼21% -43%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2687 Points ∼19% -47%
Web
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1665 Points ∼100% +60%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2392, n=179, last 2 years)
1407 Points ∼85% +35%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1334 Points ∼80% +28%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1271 Points ∼76% +22%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1210 Points ∼73% +16%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280
  (1041 - 1210, n=2)
1126 Points ∼68% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1041 Points ∼63%
AImark - Score v2.x
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
286905 Points ∼100% +5724%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1043 - 286905, n=156, last 2 years)
51780 Points ∼18% +951%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
12331 Points ∼4% +150%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
9008 Points ∼3% +83%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
4926 Points ∼2%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280
  (4714 - 4926, n=2)
4820 Points ∼2% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
4714 Points ∼2% -4%

芯片 芯片1280使用一个 ARM Mali-G68 MP4用于图形处理。这导致在合成基准测试中出现类似的情况。这款智能手机的性能是坚实的,但在其价格范围内有点低于平均水平。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1453 Points ∼100% +135%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
621 Points ∼43% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
617 Points ∼42%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
348 Points ∼24% -44%
Oppo A76
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
120 Points ∼8% -81%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1564 Points ∼100% +147%
realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
637 Points ∼41% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
636 Points ∼41% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
632 Points ∼40%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
360 Points ∼23% -43%
Oppo A76
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 Points ∼1% -97%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5711 Points ∼100% +155%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2275 Points ∼40% +2%
realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2264 Points ∼40% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2238 Points ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1215 Points ∼21% -46%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1210 Points ∼21% -46%
Oppo A76
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
439 Points ∼8% -80%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5765 Points ∼100% +155%
realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2294 Points ∼40% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2293 Points ∼40% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2262 Points ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1245 Points ∼22% -45%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1235 Points ∼21% -45%
Oppo A76
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
446 Points ∼8% -80%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2882 Points ∼100% +11%
realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2811 Points ∼98% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2689 Points ∼93% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2651 Points ∼92% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2594 Points ∼90%
Oppo A76
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2576 Points ∼89% -1%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4403 Points ∼100% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3911 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3902 Points ∼89% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2461 Points ∼56% -37%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2396 Points ∼54% -39%
Oppo A76
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1145 Points ∼26% -71%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3911 Points ∼100% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3546 Points ∼91% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3514 Points ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2501 Points ∼64% -29%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2489 Points ∼64% -29%
Oppo A76
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1306 Points ∼33% -63%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4864 Points ∼100% +60%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3804 Points ∼78% +25%
realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3717 Points ∼76% +22%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3097 Points ∼64% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3035 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2901 Points ∼60% -4%
Oppo A76
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2683 Points ∼55% -12%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10875 Points ∼100% +177%
realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4400 Points ∼40% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3982 Points ∼37% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3922 Points ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2597 Points ∼24% -34%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2570 Points ∼24% -34%
Oppo A76
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1184 Points ∼11% -70%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8234 Points ∼100% +124%
realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4227 Points ∼51% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3746 Points ∼45% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3683 Points ∼45%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2770 Points ∼34% -25%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2659 Points ∼32% -28%
Oppo A76
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1352 Points ∼16% -63%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3553 Points ∼100% +25%
realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3314 Points ∼93% +17%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2833 Points ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2730 Points ∼77% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2261 Points ∼64% -20%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6068 Points ∼100% +16%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5216 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5172 Points ∼85% -1%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3846 Points ∼63% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3805 Points ∼63% -27%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5122 Points ∼100% +17%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4395 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4021 Points ∼79% -9%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3777 Points ∼74% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3499 Points ∼68% -20%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4097 Points ∼100% +14%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3621 Points ∼88% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3592 Points ∼88%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2714 Points ∼66% -24%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2575 Points ∼63% -28%
Oppo A76
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1357 Points ∼33% -62%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4340 Points ∼100% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3939 Points ∼91% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3885 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2546 Points ∼59% -34%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2525 Points ∼58% -35%
Oppo A76
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1177 Points ∼27% -70%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3529 Points ∼100% +24%
realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3425 Points ∼97% +21%
Oppo A76
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2930 Points ∼83% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2842 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2823 Points ∼80% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2765 Points ∼78% -3%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5434 Points ∼100% +17%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4645 Points ∼85% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4630 Points ∼85%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3965 Points ∼73% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3713 Points ∼68% -20%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6313 Points ∼100% +17%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5510 Points ∼87% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5418 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4014 Points ∼64% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3975 Points ∼63% -27%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3801 Points ∼100% +24%
realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3653 Points ∼96% +19%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3069 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3018 Points ∼79% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2997 Points ∼79% -2%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
121 fps ∼100% +55%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
81 fps ∼67% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
78 fps ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 fps ∼50% -23%
realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps ∼50% -23%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps ∼46% -28%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
161 fps ∼100% +77%
realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
107 fps ∼66% +18%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
92 fps ∼57% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
91 fps ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
68 fps ∼42% -25%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
66 fps ∼41% -27%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps ∼100% +37%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
59 fps ∼73%
realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
57 fps ∼70% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
56 fps ∼69% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
54 fps ∼67% -8%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
36 fps ∼44% -39%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
92 fps ∼100% +53%
realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
68 fps ∼74% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
61 fps ∼66% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
41 fps ∼45% -32%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps ∼43% -33%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps ∼100% +46%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
51 fps ∼94% +38%
realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
41 fps ∼76% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
37 fps ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
35 fps ∼65% -5%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps ∼43% -38%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps ∼100% +63%
realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
46 fps ∼74% +21%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
38 fps ∼61% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
38 fps ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
26 fps ∼42% -32%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps ∼42% -32%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps ∼100% +67%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23 fps ∼66% +10%
realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps ∼66% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20 fps ∼57% -5%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps ∼37% -38%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps ∼100% +83%
realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
27 fps ∼64% +17%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23 fps ∼55% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps ∼55%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps ∼38% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
13 fps ∼31% -43%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps ∼100% +106%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
17 fps ∼52% +6%
realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps ∼52% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
15 fps ∼45% -6%
Oppo A76
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps ∼33% -31%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.3 fps ∼28% -42%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps ∼100% +90%
realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps ∼58% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10 fps ∼53% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10 fps ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6.2 fps ∼33% -38%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.2 fps ∼33% -38%
Oppo A76
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.3 fps ∼17% -67%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps ∼100% +68%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
30 fps ∼71% +20%
realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
27 fps ∼64% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23 fps ∼55% -8%
Oppo A76
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps ∼40% -32%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps ∼36% -40%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps ∼100% +50%
realme 9 Pro Plus
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps ∼77% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
26 fps ∼67% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
17 fps ∼44% -35%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps ∼44% -35%
Oppo A76
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.6 fps ∼25% -63%

Galaxy A33 5G加载网站的速度非常快,可以迅速地进行网上冲浪。然而,小的停顿可能不时发生。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (14.8 - 137874, n=177, last 2 years)
852 Points ∼100% +1191%
Motorola Moto G200 5G (Chrome97)
75.9 Points ∼9% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G (Chrome)
66.011 Points ∼8%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280 (63.5 - 66, n=2)
64.8 Points ∼8% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
63.5 Points ∼7% -4%
realme 9 Pro Plus (Chrome 99)
53.7 Points ∼6% -19%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
43.83 Points ∼5% -34%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88)
36.3 Points ∼4% -45%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Motorola Moto G200 5G (Chrome97)
79.8 runs/min ∼100% +66%
Average of class Smartphone (12.5 - 375, n=163, last 2 years)
70.3 runs/min ∼88% +46%
realme 9 Pro Plus (Chome 99)
53.2 runs/min ∼67% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chome 101)
51.24 runs/min ∼64% +7%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280 (48 - 51.2, n=2)
49.6 runs/min ∼62% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G (Chrome)
47.99 runs/min ∼60%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
39.8 runs/min ∼50% -17%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Motorola Moto G200 5G (Chrome97)
147 Points ∼100% +79%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 292, n=176, last 2 years)
101.9 Points ∼69% +24%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G (Chrome 102.0.5005.99)
82 Points ∼56%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280 (69 - 82, n=2)
75.5 Points ∼51% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
69 Points ∼47% -16%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
62 Points ∼42% -24%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88)
51 Points ∼35% -38%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Motorola Moto G200 5G (Chrome97)
28695 Points ∼100% +17%
Average of class Smartphone (3905 - 74261, n=196, last 2 years)
26779 Points ∼93% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G (Chrome 102.0.5005.99)
24521 Points ∼85%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280 (24159 - 24521, n=2)
24340 Points ∼85% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
24159 Points ∼84% -1%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
19010 Points ∼66% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88)
14156 Points ∼49% -42%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88)
3467 ms * ∼100% -87%
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 12437, n=186, last 2 years)
2582 ms * ∼74% -39%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Chrome 96)
2410 ms * ∼70% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
1920.3 ms * ∼55% -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 1280 (1857 - 1920, n=2)
1888 ms * ∼54% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G (Chrome)
1856.6 ms * ∼54%
Motorola Moto G200 5G (Chrome97)
1358 ms * ∼39% +27%

* ... smaller is better

UFS 2.2没有打破记录,在日常使用中偶尔会出现较长的加载和等待时间,这就是证明。一些对比设备在读/写性能方面表现得更好。

Samsung Galaxy A33 5GMotorola Moto G200 5GOppo A76Samsung Galaxy A32 5GSamsung Galaxy A53Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5Grealme 9 Pro PlusAverage 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
89%
26%
3%
4%
11%
16%
2%
23%
Sequential Read 256KB
512.84
1898
270%
980.7
91%
858
67%
510.1
-1%
964
88%
991
93%
706 ?(303 - 999, n=36)
38%
993 ?(45.6 - 1999, n=257, last 2 years)
94%
Sequential Write 256KB
487.66
712
46%
711.7
46%
381.7
-22%
486.7
0%
471
-3%
474.9
-3%
492 ?(105.3 - 884, n=36)
1%
567 ?(11.9 - 1783, n=257, last 2 years)
16%
Random Read 4KB
216.48
155.9
-28%
174.7
-19%
174.6
-19%
229.9
6%
148.8
-31%
173.5
-20%
175 ?(89.3 - 253, n=36)
-19%
183.3 ?(13.5 - 543, n=257, last 2 years)
-15%
Random Write 4KB
194.12
322.5
66%
162.7
-16%
167.1
-14%
210.8
9%
171.8
-11%
182.1
-6%
173.2 ?(113.8 - 258, n=36)
-11%
184.5 ?(18.4 - 503, n=258, last 2 years)
-5%

游戏。PUBG移动版以30FPS运行

Galaxy A33 5G的90赫兹屏幕只在图形要求不高的游戏中闪光,即使这样也不一定能保证。例如,《地铁冲浪》被限制在30FPS。其他游戏,如Armajet,平均能超过80FPS。

更多的图形要求的游戏几乎没有超过30FPS的标志,由于缺乏计算能力的部分Exynos 1280.但它们决不是不能玩的。恰恰相反。在Galaxy A33 5G的高清/高设置下,《PUBG Mobile》以几乎恒定的30 FPS运行。

帧率是通过我们的Gamebench测试工具确定的。

氩氦刀
氩氦刀
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø79 (45-90)
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G; PUBG Mobile; 2.0.0: Ø29.8 (26-32)
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G; Subway Surfers; 2.35.0: Ø59.6 (52-60)

排放。良好的立体声扬声器

温度

GFXBench Akkutest T-Rex
GFXBench Akkutest T-Rex

Galaxy A33 5G在运行过程中始终使用舒适。在空闲模式下,表面温度测量为30.2°C,而在负载下则上升到36.1°C。智能手机的温度不会超过温热度。

内部温度也没有问题。正如3DMark的Wild Life压力测试和GFXBench的电池测试所示,只要环境温度在正常范围内,Galaxy A33 5G可以在任何时候充分发挥其性能。

Max. Load
 35.8 °C35.7 °C35.4 °C 
 36.1 °C35.4 °C35.9 °C 
 33.3 °C35.4 °C33.3 °C 
Maximum: 36.1 °C
Average: 35.1 °C
33.6 °C34.1 °C34.9 °C
32.8 °C35.3 °C35.9 °C
32.4 °C33.7 °C35.1 °C
Maximum: 35.9 °C
Average: 34.2 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 (7.36min) % ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.6 (13.7min) % ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 (13.4min) % ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
98.9 (1240min) % ∼99% -1%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
80.4 (27.4min) % ∼81% -19%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.3 (3.76min) % ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99 (2.15min) % ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
97.8 (3.75min) % ∼98% -2%
Motorola Moto G200 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 (7.1min) % ∼80% -20%
051015202530Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø3.77 (3.76-3.79)
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø7.57 (7.1-8.98)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø3.81 (3.75-3.84)
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.5 (13.4-13.5)
Motorola Moto G200 5G Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø28.8 (27.4-34.2)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.7 (13.7-13.7)

发言人

三星智能手机的两个扬声器--一个位于USB-C接口旁边,另一个位于显示屏下方的自拍镜区域--产生良好的声音,其特点是中音和高音平衡。然而,低音音调几乎不存在。

音频设备可以通过USB-C适配器连接到智能手机上,或通过蓝牙5.1配对。然而,Galaxy A33 5G在蓝牙音频编解码方面相当受限,因为这些编解码仅限于AAC、aptX、LDAC和SBC。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203939.82524.429.73120.425.74018.325.85030.7376325.5248023.924.510018.123.91252032.216025.248.920016.850.425014.456.73151756.640011.858.650012.962.763014.660.280013.665.2100012.271.3125013.676.5160013.877.3200013.477.9250013.478.8315013.477.3400013.580500013.479.5630013.575.8800013.275.41000013.575.21250013.669.41600013.359.7SPL25.988.7N0.772.3median 13.5median 69.4Delta1.610.85338.644.538.433.728.833.434.535.837.630.128.621.323.52121.516.327.714.738.212.94514.351.21353.110.857.112.362.713.566.519.571.61578.514.177.914.97611.976.612.87615.472.616.573.216.767.517.272.31865.117.963.817.658.518.351.82886.10.962.1median 15median 65.12.111.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A33 5GSamsung Galaxy A53
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy A53 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命。不像前代产品那样长

消耗功率

在功耗方面,Galaxy A33 5G总体上并不真正突出,但它在负载下的功耗水平相对较高。能量是通过一个可选的25瓦电源提供的,在这个价格范围内,它不能提供最快的充电性能。不支持无线充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.11 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.88 / 1.47 / 1.52 Watt
Load midlight 5.38 / 6.62 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G200 5G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A53
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
5000 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 1280
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
3%
-27%
-2%
4%
-1%
-3%
Idle Minimum *
0.88
0.6
32%
0.64
27%
0.9
-2%
0.51
42%
0.89 ?(0.88 - 0.9, n=2)
-1%
0.887 ?(0.12 - 2.5, n=194, last 2 years)
-1%
Idle Average *
1.47
0.9
39%
1.95
-33%
1.3
12%
1.96
-33%
1.385 ?(1.3 - 1.47, n=2)
6%
1.568 ?(0.65 - 3.6, n=194, last 2 years)
-7%
Idle Maximum *
1.52
1.5
1%
1.98
-30%
1.6
-5%
2.01
-32%
1.56 ?(1.52 - 1.6, n=2)
-3%
1.783 ?(0.69 - 3.7, n=194, last 2 years)
-17%
Load Average *
5.38
7
-30%
6.77
-26%
5.7
-6%
3.86
28%
5.54 ?(5.38 - 5.7, n=2)
-3%
4.36 ?(2.1 - 7.74, n=194, last 2 years)
19%
Load Maximum *
6.62
8.4
-27%
11.42
-73%
7.3
-10%
5.62
15%
6.96 ?(6.62 - 7.3, n=2)
-5%
7.17 ?(3.56 - 11.9, n=194, last 2 years)
-8%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Samsung Exynos 1280: Ø4.77 (1.049-8.56)
Motorola Moto G200 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G: Ø6.41 (2.83-8.44)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Samsung Exynos 1280; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.07 (3.46-4.78)
Motorola Moto G200 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.29 (8.22-8.34)
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Samsung Exynos 1280; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.112 (1.07-1.512)
Motorola Moto G200 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.04 (0.918-1.429)

电池寿命

电池寿命总体上是坚实的,但也有点令人失望。这是我们在比较结果时得到的印象--近13小时的网上冲浪和超过19小时的视频播放--与那些Galaxy A32 5G.尽管电池大小相同,我们的评测设备显然表现得更差,这可能是由于更亮的显示屏和切换到 Exynos 1280.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
34h 01min
WiFi Websurfing
12h 51min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
19h 06min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 47min
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G200 5G
5000 mAh
Oppo A76
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A53
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
12%
29%
33%
1%
10%
Reader / Idle
2041
2695
32%
2958
45%
2431
19%
2722
33%
H.264
1146
1501
31%
1323
15%
1146
0%
1008
-12%
WiFi v1.3
771
905
17%
993
29%
1235
60%
886
15%
966
25%
Load
347
229
-34%
393
13%
246
-29%
322
-7%

Pros

+ 明亮的90 Hz AMOLED显示屏
+ 立体声扬声器
+ 5G和NFC
+ 带有OIS的良好摄像头
+ 准确的GPS
+ 更新时间长

Cons

- 只有混合型双SIM卡
- 几乎没有任何性能储备
- 缓慢的内存
- 不包括电源适配器

对三星Galaxy A33 5G的评价

在审查中。三星Galaxy A33 5G。评测设备由德国三星公司提供。
在审查中。三星Galaxy A33 5G。评测设备由德国三星公司提供。

三星的Galaxy A33 5G是一款坚实的中档智能手机,已经以279.98美元的价格(在撰写本文时)上市。扎实的系统性能、明亮的显示屏和良好的电池运行时间都确保了在日常生活中的可靠使用。

与前代产品相比,三星在许多方面都有改进。Galaxy A33 5G配备了令人印象深刻的高对比度90 Hz AMOLED面板,而不是相当无色的TFT-LCD,这在这个价格范围内还不是标准配置。另一个卖点是三星承诺的长更新期--如果你相信制造商的话,Android 16也将提供给Galaxy A33 5G。虽然相机模块几乎没有变化,但主相机现在配备了光学图像稳定功能。

三星Galaxy A33 5G是一款坚实的中档智能手机,在许多方面都超过了它的前辈,并接近于Galaxy A53 5G。

诚然,Galaxy A33 5G并非所有东西都值得称赞。与前代产品一样,仍然只有混合双SIM卡,存储内存绝对不是最快的,而且整体上有一些性能问题,以及操作过程中偶尔出现的停顿。另一个缺点是,三星取消了插孔,并对25瓦的电源额外收费。

凭借其强大的性能,Galaxy A33 5G让 Galaxy A53 5G,它在Galaxy A的层次结构中更高一等,可以说是一骑绝尘。除了更大的外形尺寸、更好的摄像头、120赫兹的显示屏和更多的存储选项之外,这两款智能手机在电池、通信模块和SoC方面几乎完全相同。即使在外观上,差异也是微不足道的。Galaxy A53 5G的自拍相机不像Galaxy A33 5G那样在水滴状凹槽里,而是在一个圆形凹槽里。

三星Galaxy A33 5G的替代品有,比如说 摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G,以及 奥普A76小米Poco M4 Pro 5G,它们也有一个90赫兹的屏幕,价格非常相似。摩托罗拉Moto G200 5G也比Galaxy A33 5G强大得多,因为它的 骁龙888 Plus 5G.

价格和可用性

三星Galaxy A33 5G通过亚马逊提供各种颜色的产品,价格不一,取决于购买的国家。例如。

美国,起价为267.49美元
英国, 起价为231.98英镑
加拿大, 起价为408.04加元
澳大利亚, 起价为485.60澳元

Samsung Galaxy A33 5G - 08/30/2022 v7
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
85%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
50 / 70 → 72%