realme 9 Pro Plus智能手机评测--大量的性能和体面的低光拍照
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84.1 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2022 | Realme 9 Pro Plus Dimensity 920, Mali-G68 MP4 | 182 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.40" | 2400x1080 | |
| 82.2 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2021 | Realme 8 Pro SD 720G, Adreno 618 | 176 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.40" | 2400x1080 | |
| 83.1 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | OnePlus Nord CE 5G (Nord Core Edition) SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619 | 170 g | 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.43" | 2400x1080 | |
| 86 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2021 | Xiaomi Poco F3 SD 870, Adreno 650 | 196 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
| 85.1 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L | 189 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.50" | 2400x1080 |
外壳和功能 - 不寻常的颜色
realme 9系列应该能提供物美价廉的功能。realme 9 Pro Plus的售价约为400欧元（约443美元），有两种配置。
- realme 9 Pro+配备6GB内存和128GB大容量存储。380欧元（约合人民币420元）
- realme 9 Pro+配备8GB内存和256GB大容量存储。430欧元（约合476美元）
该制造商为其智能手机提供三种颜色。极光绿，一种深绿色；午夜黑，一种天鹅绒般的蓝色闪耀的黑色；日出蓝，一种明亮的蓝色，是最不寻常的颜色，其涂层在阳光下会褪色。你也只能得到日出蓝的小内存变体。
外壳本身是由塑料制成的，光亮的背面非常容易沾染指纹。稳定性是令人信服的，即使是较强的手指压力也不会传到屏幕上。做工也很干净，没有明显的棱角。
还提供了一个3.5毫米的插孔，用于声音输出，有Hi-Res认证，还有NFC，你可以通过指纹传感器测量你的心率，作为一个小的补充。
通信、软件和操作 - 现代操作系统与臃肿的软件
在我们用参考路由器华硕GT-AXE11000进行的WLAN测试中，realme 9 Pro Plus被证明是很敏捷的，但速度不太稳定；数据速率时不时会有下降的情况。当然，这是一款5G智能手机，许多4G频率也被支持，所以你很可能在旅行中使用移动互联网。
realme UI 3是基于Android 12，安全补丁是在测试时从2022年2月开始的，因此是相当最新的。一些预装的第三方应用程序，如购物门户网站，必须接受，但它们可以被删除，没有任何问题。很好的是，realme已经照顾到了DRM-L1认证，所以你也可以观看高清的流媒体视频。
90赫兹的屏幕可以流畅地操作。表面覆盖着一层保护膜，但手指在上面也能轻松滑行。集成在屏幕上的指纹传感器对放置的手指迅速作出反应。只要提起智能手机，即使在待机状态下也能看到指示扫描仪位置的图标。传感器在相当短的等待后对激活作出反应，并可靠地解锁设备。然而，它位于屏幕上相当远的位置，这需要一些时间来适应。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G | |
| Realme 8 Pro | |
| OnePlus Nord CE 5G (Nord Core Edition) | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G | |
| OnePlus Nord CE 5G (Nord Core Edition) | |
| Realme 8 Pro | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Realme 9 Pro Plus | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Realme 9 Pro Plus | |
照相机 - 否则，一般的照相机在弱光下是很好的。
具有光学图像稳定功能的索尼IMX776作为该中档手机的主要传感器。它的分辨率为5000万像素。通过像素分选，有效分辨率降低到1200万像素，这在传感器上创造了更大、更多的感光像素。
在我们的测试照片中，图像清晰度处于平均范围，但亮度和色彩还原度都很好。在低光照和高对比度的情况下，这款智能手机能产生温暖的、有时相当细致的照片。
广角摄像头有800万像素，处于通常水平。当你更多地去了解细节时，就会失去很多东西，但照片对于概览拍摄来说是不错的。Realme还安装了自己的微距镜头，仅有200万像素，可以拍出不错的特写。
在正面，还有一个1600万像素的自拍镜。照片可以更亮一点，在黑暗区域显示更多细节。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera PlantMain camera EnvironmentMain camera Low LightWide-angle camera
显示 - 良好的色彩再现
AMOLED显示屏现在是完全正常的东西，即使在中端。realme 9 Pro+提供典型的全高清分辨率，但亮度比前代产品更均匀。然而，那些追求高峰值亮度的人将不得不看小米或三星；realme手机的屏幕无法跟上。
作为回报，色彩的显示精度相当好，响应时间也令人信服。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 550 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.8 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
95.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.215
CCT: 6337 K
| Realme 9 Pro Plus AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4" | Realme 8 Pro AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4" | OnePlus Nord CE 5G (Nord Core Edition) AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4" | Xiaomi Poco F3 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | 17% | 64% | 64% | -7% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 8 ? | 8 ? -0% | 3.6 ? 55% | 3.6 ? 55% | 10 ? -25% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 9 ? | 6 ? 33% | 2.4 ? 73% | 2.4 ? 73% | 8 ? 11% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 218.3 | 114.7 | 373.1 ? | 490.2 ? | 231.5 |
| Screen | -50% | 7% | 46% | 6% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 550 | 581 6% | 590 7% | 889 62% | 736 34% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 558 | 563 1% | 596 7% | 902 62% | 751 35% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 98 | 86 -12% | 97 -1% | 95 -3% | 96 -2% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 4.34 -141% | 1.9 -6% | 0.9 50% | 2.18 -21% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.51 | 7.15 -59% | 3.8 16% | 1.9 58% | 5.69 -26% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.5 | 4.9 -96% | 2.1 16% | 1.3 48% | 2.1 16% |
| Gamma | 2.215 99% | 2.327 95% | 2.13 103% | 2.26 97% | 2.27 97% |
| CCT | 6337 103% | 7658 85% | 6698 97% | 6614 98% | 6563 99% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -17% /
-34% | 36% /
21% | 55% /
51% | -1% /
3% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 218.3 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 218.3 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 218.3 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8167 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能、排放和电池寿命--Realme手机的动力十足
该 联发科Dimensity 920是一个来自2020年的SoC，但在我们的基准测试中以相当高的性能说服了我们。只有 小米Poco F3配有 骁龙870能在我们价格相近的对比设备中提供更多动力。图形性能显示了与Realme 8 Pro相比的一个重大飞跃。 realme 8 Pro.同样，小米的对比设备也明显更快。
在内存方面，由于UFS 2.2，realme 9 Pro+证明是快速的，但它在价格范围内还没有达到这个水平。同样，它是 小米Poco F3，它提供的东西甚至更多。
realme 9 Pro Plus的外壳上的温度在较长时间的负载中可以上升到44.5℃（112.1°F）。这本身没有问题，但在炎热的夏天，温度上升可能会更高，从而变得令人不快。
立体声扬声器的最大音量相当高，但声音很平衡，你可以听一段音乐。还可以通过蓝牙和3.5毫米插孔连接外部音频设备。
realme手机在电池寿命方面不能完全跟上前辈的步伐，但在我们的无线网络测试中，它在同级别的比较中仍然做得相当好，只有不到16小时。这款手机可以用高达60瓦的功率充电，而且还包括一个相应的充电器。制造商承诺在15分钟内充电50%。即使我们需要多花几分钟时间，我们对充电速度也非常满意。
| Realme 9 Pro Plus | Realme 8 Pro | OnePlus Nord CE 5G (Nord Core Edition) | Xiaomi Poco F3 | Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G | Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -52% | -2% | 24% | 0% | -0% | 140% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 991 | 474 -52% | 951 -4% | 1378 39% | 951 -4% | 736 ? -26% | 2207 ? 123% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 474.9 | 191.7 -60% | 466 -2% | 684 44% | 486.5 2% | 532 ? 12% | 1822 ? 284% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 173.5 | 98.5 -43% | 187.6 8% | 208 20% | 168.2 -3% | 193 ? 11% | 292 ? 68% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 182.1 | 84.8 -53% | 168.1 -8% | 170.6 -6% | 192.5 6% | 186.3 ? 2% | 339 ? 86% |
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.5 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
演讲者
Realme 9 Pro Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Realme 8 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
| Realme 9 Pro Plus 4500 mAh | Realme 8 Pro 4500 mAh | OnePlus Nord CE 5G (Nord Core Edition) 4500 mAh | Xiaomi Poco F3 4520 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G 4500 mAh | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | ||||||
| WiFi Websurfing (h) | 15.9 | 16.8 6% | 15.4 -3% | 13.4 -16% | 12 -25% | 18.7 ? 18% |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 坚实的手机，没有主要的弱点
realme 9 Pro Plus是一款非常坚实的中档手机，提供了你在这个价格范围内所期望的一切。一个快速的屏幕，快速充电，体面的运行时间，快速的存储，大量的系统功率和灵活的相机系统。
机箱有一个体面的构造，但并没有从人群中脱颖而出。除了预装的臃肿软件，安排清晰的系统软件令人信服。许多摄影模式，如倾斜移轴或星光模式都很好，但相机质量总体上只是一般。在测试中，Wi-Fi数据速率也有一些波动。
realme 9 Pro+是一款扎实的中端手机，有很多性能和快速充电。
如果所有这些还不够，你将不得不购买 小米Poco F3，它目前仍然提供最佳的性价比。三星的Galaxy A52s 5G也有很好的性能率，但令人失望的是，通过附带的电源适配器充电的速度很慢。
价格和可用性
Y你可以直接从realme购买9 Pro+。.在测试的时候，有一个 Realme垫赠送的。在amazon.de,Cyberport和notebooksbilliger.de你可以得到没有额外费用的智能手机，但价格要便宜一些。
Realme 9 Pro Plus
- 08/30/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Price comparison
