Notebookcheck Logo

奥普A76评测--光影下的美丽手机

狭窄的视角。 Oppo A76是一款经济实惠的中档手机,由于其漂亮的设计,看起来比实际价格要高。然而,这里和那里的功能可以更好,特别是考虑到强大的竞争。因此,问题仍然是:Oppo A76值得推荐吗?
Android ARM Smartphone
奥普A76
Oppo A76 (A Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) / Silver (Cortex-A53)
Graphics adapter
Memory
4096 MB 
Display
6.56 inch 20:9, 1612 x 720 pixel 269 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 105 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD (dedicated), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, proximity sensor, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41) , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.4 x 164.4 x 75.7
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 33 Watt Super VOOC charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/​2.2, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps (Camera 1); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, depth of field (Camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/​2.0, Videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, Keyboard: virtual keyboard, quick charger, USB cable, silicone bumper, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.81 W/kg (head), 1.22 W/kg (body), fanless
Weight
189 g
Price
249 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
77.7 %
06/2022
Oppo A76
SD 680, Adreno 610
189 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.56"1612x720
80.5 %
01/2022
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2
195 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2400x1080
80.4 %
04/2022
Motorola Moto G41
Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2
178 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.40"2400x1080
79.6 %
08/2021
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2
203 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.60"2400x1080

箱子和设备 - 高档次的设计

笔记本 奥普A74去年,但我们不得不批评其缓慢的SoC和缺乏NFC。现在的Oppo A76是继任者。然而,看一下设备清单,这两款智能手机只有很少的共同点。

OPPA76在外观上也有所不同,提供浅蓝色或黑色的磨砂背面,右侧的待机按钮位置较低,指纹传感器集成在那里。另一方面,从正面看,你可以看到更多相似之处。总的来说,这款智能手机结构坚固,但对屏幕的中等压力足以使画面变形。

在功能方面,这款手机可以拥有4GB的内存和128GB的快速UFS 2.2存储;其他存储版本目前还没有,至少在欧洲没有。OPPO A76中包含NFC,这在这个价格范围内还不是理所当然的。

microSD读卡器是独立的,为这个级别提供典型的速度。

奥普A76
奥普A76
奥普A76
奥普A76

尺寸比较

167.2 mm 76.4 mm 9 mm 203 g164.4 mm 75.7 mm 8.4 mm 189 g163.56 mm 75.78 mm 8.75 mm 195 g161.9 mm 73.9 mm 8.3 mm 178 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
  (Angelbird V60)
44 MB/s ∼100% +72%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10.9 - 59.2, n=85, last 2 years)
26.5 MB/s ∼60% +4%
Oppo A76
  (Angelbird V60)
25.6 MB/s ∼58%
Motorola Moto G41
  (Angelbird V60)
24.3 MB/s ∼55% -5%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
  (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
15.47 MB/s ∼35% -40%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Oppo A76 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.7 (29.6-50.5)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø32 (25-46.5)
Motorola Moto G41 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø29.1 (18.9-42.3)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø28.8 (15.3-45.8)
Oppo A76 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.8 (36.1-83.9)
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø75.5 (58.6-78.9)
Motorola Moto G41 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø67.9 (19.3-81.6)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø70.7 (11.8-76.8)

通信、软件和操作 - 仅限LTE,但支持NFC

Oppo A76目前没有像前代那样的5G模式,所以你必须用LTE作为最快的移动技术来解决。有几个频段可供选择,但你必须在出国前检查你是否能使用当地的移动互联网。

Wi-Fi模块支持Wi-Fi 5作为最快的标准,这在这个价格范围内是很常见的。然而,Oppo A76在传输速度的稳定性方面存在问题:在我们用参考路由器华硕ROG GT-AXE11000进行的测试中,它的传输速度波动很大,平均而言,它不太接近同价位的智能手机。我们已经注意到这种行为在 奥普A74观察到的。

基于Android 11的ColorOS 11.1已经预装在智能手机上。在印度,基于Android 12的ColorOS 12的测试版已经为Oppo A76发布,所以可以推测这个版本也将来到欧洲。一般来说,制造商每3个月会谈论2个新的Android 版本和安全更新。

90赫兹的屏幕使操作感觉相当流畅,但只有在后台运行的应用程序不太多的情况下,因为SoC几乎没有提供任何性能储备。指纹传感器位于外壳右侧的待机按钮上。它的工作相当可靠,但需要一秒钟才能解锁智能手机。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
348 (340min - 353max) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
361 (322min - 366max) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Motorola Moto G41
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
367 (350min - 381max) MBit/s ∼100% +18%
Oppo A76
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
311 (181min - 368max) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Motorola Moto G41
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
332 (302min - 340max) MBit/s ∼100% +18%
Oppo A76
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
282 (186min - 332max) MBit/s ∼85%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø282 (186-332)
; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø311 (181-368)

照相机--小编提供

前置摄像头的录制
前置摄像头的录制

我们在Oppo的A76中寻找广角摄像头是徒劳的。与许多其他型号不同,只有1300万像素的主摄像头和一个用于人像模式下模糊效果的额外摄像头。因此,相机系统的灵活性不大。

与前代产品不同,主镜头不再是像素比对相机,因此感光度也较低。相应地,黑暗环境中的照片亮度不高,看起来有斑点,只有少数细节可见。白天的HDR功能是令人信服的,但细节的多样性相当平庸,大面积有明显的像素图案。主摄像头在实验室中的文字显示有时会有问题,但我们喜欢图片边缘的清晰度。

视频可以以30帧/秒的速度录制,自动对焦和曝光反应相当快,通常也很准确。

总的来说,对于这个价格范围来说,这是一个体面的相机,对快照很有用。然而,有更高要求的用户将不得不花更多钱购买更高质量的智能手机。

前置摄像头的分辨率为800万像素。第一印象是体面的,但你不应该把照片放大太多。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow Light
click to load images
ColorChecker
15.2 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
9 ∆E
0 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo A76: 10.59 ∆E min: 0 - max: 18.29 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.4 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
39.1 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
43.8 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
54 ∆E
34.4 ∆E
41.4 ∆E
26.5 ∆E
65.9 ∆E
64.9 ∆E
29.9 ∆E
48.3 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
76.6 ∆E
41.8 ∆E
45.3 ∆E
90.1 ∆E
70.5 ∆E
51.8 ∆E
36.7 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo A76: 46.67 ∆E min: 13.76 - max: 90.12 ∆E

显示 - 快速而明亮

子像素结构
子像素结构

凭借其90-Hz的IPS显示屏,Oppo A76的刷新率领先于其他许多同价位的智能手机。然而,在分辨率方面,你不得不使用720p,这仍然是可以的,但使显示屏看起来比通常的1080p屏幕更洗练一些。

然而,大约570cd/m²的最大亮度是相当不错的,所以你也可以在更明亮的日子里在户外使用这款智能手机。屏幕良好的色彩还原度也令人欣喜。

563
cd/m²
555
cd/m²
586
cd/m²
565
cd/m²
569
cd/m²
574
cd/m²
529
cd/m²
561
cd/m²
556
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 586 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 562 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 569 cd/m²
Contrast: 1138:1 (Black: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.16 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
94.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.177
Oppo A76
IPS, 1612x720, 6.56
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
TFT-LCD, 2400x1080, 6.60
Motorola Moto G41
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.40
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.60
Response Times
-28%
78%
15%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
41 ?(20, 21)
50 ?(25.6, 24.4)
-22%
9 ?(3, 6)
78%
32 ?(17, 15)
22%
Response Time Black / White *
26 ?(11, 15)
34.8 ?(20.8, 14)
-34%
6 ?(3, 3)
77%
24 ?(13, 11)
8%
PWM Frequency
240.4
147 ?(10)
Screen
-45%
4%
-62%
Brightness middle
569
504
-11%
713
25%
415
-27%
Brightness
562
499
-11%
712
27%
378
-33%
Brightness Distribution
90
91
1%
91
1%
76
-16%
Black Level *
0.5
0.72
-44%
0.26
48%
Contrast
1138
700
-38%
1596
40%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.16
3.3
-53%
1.1
49%
5.41
-150%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.37
6
-78%
2.39
29%
9.77
-190%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.8
4.1
-128%
3.7
-106%
4.8
-167%
Gamma
2.177 101%
2.28 96%
2.264 97%
2.348 94%
CCT
6784 96%
7041 92%
7373 88%
7748 84%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-37% / -42%
41% / 23%
-24% / -47%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (36.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21751 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN色彩空间
CalMAN色彩空间
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命--动力不足的Oppo A76

凭借其 高通骁龙680如果不是小米和三星的5G手机,Oppo A76将与竞争对手平起平坐,这表明这个价格可能有更多的动力。图形单元只能在屏幕测试中被说服,即在屏幕的低原始分辨率下;否则,一些竞争对手在这里也是领先的。

然而,令人高兴的是,Oppo安装了快速的UFS 2.2存储,因此至少可以帮助系统在加载或启动应用程序时有点快。然而,总的来说,你不得不期待,在后台运行更复杂的应用程序时,系统只能非常缓慢地运行,或者有时根本无法运行。至少最大的机箱温度保持在限制范围内。

单声道扬声器在媒体播放方面做得很好,听起来没有太令人不快的高音,而且声音很大,足以让一个中等大小的房间充满声音。然而,你用耳机自然能得到更好的声音。在我们的测试中,通过3.5毫米端口或蓝牙5.0的连接工作没有问题。目前所有的aptX编解码器、SBC、AAC和LDAC都可用于无线声音传输。

Oppo A76可以通过附带的充电器以高达33瓦的功率进行充电。这款手机需要大约一个半小时才能充满电。在我们的WLAN测试中,运行时间比许多对手略高,只有 Galaxy A22 5G提供了更多的耐力。

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core (sort by value)
Oppo A76
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
384 Points ∼56%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
598 Points ∼88% +56%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
352 Points ∼52% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
564 Points ∼83% +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (374 - 384, n=6)
380 Points ∼56% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=258, last 2 years)
681 Points ∼100% +77%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Oppo A76
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1675 Points ∼75%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1809 Points ∼81% +8%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1282 Points ∼58% -23%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1712 Points ∼77% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (1557 - 1738, n=6)
1629 Points ∼73% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=258, last 2 years)
2225 Points ∼100% +33%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Oppo A76
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
6679 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
9402 Points ∼92% +41%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
6749 Points ∼66% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
7434 Points ∼73% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (6679 - 8730, n=5)
7304 Points ∼72% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 18567, n=149, last 2 years)
10191 Points ∼100% +53%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Oppo A76
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1357 Points ∼50%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2714 Points ∼100% +100%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1411 Points ∼52% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2360 Points ∼87% +74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (1332 - 2098, n=6)
1475 Points ∼54% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=180, last 2 years)
2534 Points ∼93% +87%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo A76
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1177 Points ∼45%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2546 Points ∼97% +116%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1238 Points ∼47% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2217 Points ∼84% +88%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (1154 - 1188, n=5)
1169 Points ∼44% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=179, last 2 years)
2636 Points ∼100% +124%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Oppo A76
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2930 Points ∼83%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3529 Points ∼100% +20%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2558 Points ∼72% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3047 Points ∼86% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (2683 - 2930, n=5)
2791 Points ∼79% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (688 - 5318, n=179, last 2 years)
2861 Points ∼81% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo A76
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1352 Points ∼33%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2770 Points ∼67% +105%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1434 Points ∼35% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2463 Points ∼60% +82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (1352 - 1372, n=5)
1362 Points ∼33% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 11861, n=234, last 2 years)
4124 Points ∼100% +205%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo A76
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1184 Points ∼23%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2570 Points ∼49% +117%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1269 Points ∼24% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2290 Points ∼44% +93%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (1184 - 1242, n=5)
1200 Points ∼23% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 20490, n=234, last 2 years)
5209 Points ∼100% +340%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo A76
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2683 Points ∼71%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3804 Points ∼100% +42%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2662 Points ∼70% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3350 Points ∼88% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (2573 - 2853, n=5)
2693 Points ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (635 - 5793, n=234, last 2 years)
3261 Points ∼86% +22%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Oppo A76
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
446 Points ∼14%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1235 Points ∼38% +177%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
736 Points ∼23% +65%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1094 Points ∼34% +145%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (446 - 457, n=5)
450 Points ∼14% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (216 - 10062, n=185, last 2 years)
3218 Points ∼100% +622%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Oppo A76
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
439 Points ∼13%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1210 Points ∼35% +176%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
732 Points ∼21% +67%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1074 Points ∼31% +145%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (417 - 463, n=5)
439 Points ∼13% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (205 - 11700, n=188, last 2 years)
3489 Points ∼100% +695%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Oppo A76
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
22 Points ∼2%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
360 Points ∼35% +1536%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
182 Points ∼18% +727%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
316 Points ∼31% +1336%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (22 - 127, n=6)
103.7 Points ∼10% +371%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 3080, n=143, last 2 years)
1019 Points ∼100% +4532%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo A76
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
120 Points ∼11%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
348 Points ∼32% +190%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
178 Points ∼17% +48%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1073 Points ∼100% +794%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (112 - 124, n=5)
120.4 Points ∼11% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 2864, n=139, last 2 years)
1006 Points ∼94% +738%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A76
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
17 fps ∼58%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
15 fps ∼51% -12%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
8.5 fps ∼29% -50%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
13 fps ∼44% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (7.8 - 17, n=6)
9.98 fps ∼34% -41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 104, n=254, last 2 years)
29.4 fps ∼100% +73%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A76
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
9.6 fps ∼27%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
17 fps ∼48% +77%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
9.6 fps ∼27% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
15 fps ∼43% +56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (5.1 - 9.8, n=6)
8.9 fps ∼25% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.9 - 136, n=255, last 2 years)
35.1 fps ∼100% +266%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A76
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
11 fps ∼54%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
9.3 fps ∼46% -15%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
5.4 fps ∼26% -51%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
8.1 fps ∼40% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (4.6 - 11, n=6)
5.97 fps ∼29% -46%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.1 - 69, n=255, last 2 years)
20.4 fps ∼100% +85%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo A76
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
3.3 fps ∼25%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
6.2 fps ∼46% +88%
Motorola Moto G41
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
3.4 fps ∼25% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
5.5 fps ∼41% +67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (1.4 - 3.3, n=6)
2.95 fps ∼22% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 52, n=255, last 2 years)
13.4 fps ∼100% +306%
Oppo A76Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5GMotorola Moto G41Samsung Galaxy A22 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-11%
-64%
-57%
-15%
-11%
Sequential Read 256KB
980.7
964
-2%
298.5
-70%
300.5
-69%
756 ?(482 - 999, n=20)
-23%
938 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=247, last 2 years)
-4%
Sequential Write 256KB
711.7
471
-34%
172.3
-76%
210.3
-70%
460 ?(105.3 - 857, n=20)
-35%
478 ?(11.9 - 1485, n=247, last 2 years)
-33%
Random Read 4KB
174.7
148.8
-15%
86.9
-50%
118
-32%
165.7 ?(104.5 - 253, n=20)
-5%
167.6 ?(13.5 - 345, n=247, last 2 years)
-4%
Random Write 4KB
162.7
171.8
6%
64.4
-60%
69.2
-57%
166.6 ?(120.4 - 213, n=20)
2%
161.3 ?(56.5 - 458, n=248, last 2 years)
-1%

温度

Max. Load
 38.7 °C34.4 °C31.3 °C 
 38.6 °C35.4 °C31.6 °C 
 37.9 °C34.4 °C31.5 °C 
Maximum: 38.7 °C
Average: 34.9 °C
31.2 °C34 °C36.1 °C
32.1 °C35.2 °C39.3 °C
32.1 °C35.3 °C38.4 °C
Maximum: 39.3 °C
Average: 34.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41.2 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.5 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.


热图正面
热图正面
热图背面
热图背面

演讲者

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs205340.52544.540.73133.734.34033.431.65035.833.96330.128.78021.3221002124.512516.329.616014.738.220012.943.725014.350.63151352.640010.857.550012.366.263013.569.280019.569.710001575.5125014.174.4160014.972.3200011.969.8250012.864.5315015.462.9400016.570.8500016.774.9630017.270.480001863.61000017.965.31250017.667.61600018.351.8SPL2882.9N0.953.9median 15median 65.3Delta2.19.745.643.140.24033.43231.237.53540.727.524.720.119.819.619.317.222.615.931.912.438.71245.910.249.610.154.18.760.615.266.616.368.415.673.913.174.611.174.111.57411.772.914.171.114.465.617.763.616.567.716.769.718.174.117.573.218.854.927.183.50.854.2median 15.2median 66.62.613.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOppo A76Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oppo A76 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy A22 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
5000 mAh
1156 min ∼44% +16%
Oppo A76
5000 mAh
993 min ∼38%
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
5000 mAh
966 min ∼37% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (438 - 1953, n=255, last 2 years)
907 min ∼34% -9%
Motorola Moto G41
5000 mAh
905 min ∼34% -9%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
16h 33min

Pros

+ 高品质设计
+ 明亮的90赫兹显示
+ 无PWM
+ 快速记忆

Cons

- 性能低下
- 只有720p的屏幕
- 只有一个可用的摄像头
- 波动的WLAN速率

结论--Oppo手机可以勉强胜出

在审查中。Oppo A76。测试设备由:
在审查中。Oppo A76。测试设备由:
数码港.com

从内存配置来看,Oppo A76比其前辈略微便宜一些 奥普A74然而,有些东西是不同的:有一个不那么感光的摄像头,不再有微距镜头,而且制造商现在使用的是IPS屏幕,相当明亮,色彩丰富,没有PWM,刷新率为90 Hz。

然而,与其他制造商的类似价格的智能手机相比,我们注意到更多的缺点:没有超广角摄像头,系统性能相对较低,Wi-Fi信号不稳定,720p屏幕在分辨率方面无法说服人。好的一面是良好的运行时间和快速存储。

Oppo A76缺乏某种额外的功能。尽管如此,它是一款坚实的、廉价的中档手机,拥有90赫兹的屏幕。

总的来说,Oppo A76不能真正在其竞争对手中脱颖而出,特别是 小米Poco M4 Pro 5G,特别是在非常相似的价格下提供了相当多的功能。三星,也有一个很好的价格标签,即 Galaxy A22 5G- 这是一款令人信服的、价格低廉的中端手机,它最多只能被其不太明亮的屏幕所阻挡。

价格和可用性

OPPO A76可在许多在线零售商处购买,在测试时最低价格为230欧元起。另外,amazon.de和我们的借阅者cyberport.de都有这款智能手机的报价。

Oppo A76 - 05/28/2022 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
81%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
48 / 70 → 68%
Weight
89%
Battery
91%
Display
87%
Games Performance
16 / 64 → 25%
Application Performance
60 / 86 → 70%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
64 / 90 → 71%
Camera
49%
Average
72%
78%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 奥普A76评测--光影下的美丽手机
Florian Schmitt, 2022-06- 2 (Update: 2022-06- 2)