惠普Chromebook x2 11评论。骁龙7c与Chrome OS完美搭配
惠普Chromebook x2 11是一个与几年前推出的Chromebook 11非常不同的型号。这是一款中高档的Chromebook 二合一产品，拥有高分辨率的3:2 1440p触摸屏，采用相对不常见的高通骁龙7c第一代SoC。最初宣布的价格为599美元，后来通过百思买等零售商，该机型的价格已经下降到400美元以下。
Chromebook 可拆分设备并不是那么常见，有 联想IdeaPad Duet 10是为数不多的例子之一。尽管如此，Chromebook 转换器也是一抓一大把，包括华硕Chromebook Flip 。AcerChromebook Spin, 联想IdeaPad Flex 5, 戴尔Latitude 7410Chromebook, 或三星Galaxy Chromebook 。
更多惠普评论。
Potential Competitors in Comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 79.5 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx SD 7c, Adreno 618 | 583 g | 7.7 mm | 11.00" | 2160x1440 | |
| 83.6 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5500FEA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 2 kg | 18.5 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 87.7 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2020 | Dell Latitude 7410 Chromebook Enterprise i5-10310U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.4 kg | 18.3 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 79 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2020 | Acer Chromebook Spin 311 CP311-3H-K2RJ MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3 | 1.1 kg | 18.8 mm | 11.60" | 1366x768 | |
| 79.8 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2020 | Lenovo IdeaPad Duet Chromebook 10 CT-X636F Helio P60T, Mali-G72 MP3 | 920 g | 18.2 mm | 10.10" | 1920x1200 | |
| 86.2 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2020 | Acer Chromebook Spin 713 CP713-2W-560V i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.4 kg | 16.8 mm | 13.50" | 2256x1504 |
案例
金属底盘很坚固，在硬度方面可与Surface Pro系列媲美。与Surface Pro不同的是，后部的脚架是可拆卸的。 不同于Surface Pro以帮助那些喜欢将Chromebook 纯粹作为平板电脑使用的用户进一步减轻重量。然而，与更坚固的脚架或平板电脑相比，可拆卸的键盘太脆弱了，而且质量较差。
| 片剂(g) | 583 |
| 可拆卸的键盘（克 | 227 |
| 可拆卸式脚架(g) | 240 |
连接性
只有两个USB-C端口，没有3.5毫米音频插孔。每个USB-C端口都能够充电和视频输出，用于连接外部显示器。
SD卡阅读器
使用集成的MicroSD读卡器的传输速度相对较慢。将1GB的图片从我们的UHS-II测试卡移动到桌面上需要大约29秒。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell Latitude 7410 Chromebook Enterprise (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| Acer Chromebook Spin 713 CP713-2W-560V (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5500FEA (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Angelbird V60) | |
| HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx (Angelbird V60) | |
| Motorola Edge 20 Lite (Angelbird V60) | |
沟通
当与我们的Netgear RAX200测试路由器配对时，我们能够达到真实世界的WLAN速度，高达约440Mbps。我们的设备即使在重复测试后也难以维持更高的传输速度。
根据配置的不同，4G LTE和nano-SIM是可选的。该模型不支持5G。
网络摄像头
相机质量清晰，边缘和角落均匀，即使颜色较浅，不是非常准确。没有集成闪光灯。
配件和保修
与许多其他平板电脑二合一产品不同，Chromebook x2 11标配了键盘底座和后脚架。可充电的ISU笔是可选的，只包括在某些SKU中。
标准的一年有限制造商保修适用。
输入设备
键盘
可拆卸的键盘底座从远处看很好，但在使用过程中处理得很差。它的甲板比Surface系列的可拆卸键盘更容易弯曲，这意味着每当按下一个键时，整个底座几乎总是摇晃和弹跳。按键反馈因此受到影响，整体打字体验很差。你最好使用普通的蓝牙或USB键盘，这无疑会比附带的键盘附件有更坚实的按键。
没有键盘背光可能是为了节省成本。
触摸板
光标控制在大小适中的点击板（11 x 6厘米）上可靠地工作，没有跳跃或跳动。然而，点击是非常浅的，而且反馈很弱，不能令人满意。因此，像拖放这样的多点触摸输入比他们应该做的更难执行。
显示
1440p 3:2触摸屏是Chromebook x2 11的一个亮点。对比度非常好，约为1000:1，色彩鲜艳明亮，特别是与更便宜的768p面板相比，如在 AcerChromebook Spin 311.黑白响应时间偏慢，这是写作时任何Chromebook 与IPS面板的预期。如果你打算玩很多游戏，那么OLED联想Duet 5Chromebook 或三星Galaxy Chromebook ，以及它们明显更快的响应时间可能值得考虑。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 447.8 cd/m²
Contrast: 995:1 (Black: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.48 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
Gamma: 2.08
CCT: 6624 K
| HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx IPS, 2160x1440, 11" | Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5500FEA IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Latitude 7410 Chromebook Enterprise IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Acer Chromebook Spin 311 CP311-3H-K2RJ IPS, 1366x768, 11.6" | Lenovo IdeaPad Duet Chromebook 10 CT-X636F IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Acer Chromebook Spin 713 CP713-2W-560V IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | 12% | -3% | -3% | 6% | 39% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 46.4 ? | 35 ? 25% | 41.2 ? 11% | 45 ? 3% | 40.1 ? 14% | 36 ? 22% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 26.8 ? | 27 ? -1% | 31.2 ? -16% | 29 ? -8% | 27.5 ? -3% | 12 ? 55% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 25000 | 200 ? | ||||
| Screen | -69% | -28% | -120% | -87% | -38% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 447.8 | 282 -37% | 286.8 -36% | 219 -51% | 397 -11% | 426 -5% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 427 | 259 -39% | 262 -39% | 214 -50% | 360 -16% | 388 -9% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 88 | 84 -5% | 85 -3% | 90 2% | 81 -8% | 85 -3% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.45 | 0.15 67% | 0.2 56% | 0.21 53% | 0.44 2% | 0.56 -24% |
| Contrast (:1) | 995 | 1880 89% | 1434 44% | 1043 5% | 902 -9% | 761 -24% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.48 | 5.55 -275% | 2.05 -39% | 4.87 -229% | 3.19 -116% | 2.25 -52% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.6 | 7.46 -187% | 5.37 -107% | 18.57 -614% | 11 -323% | 5.29 -103% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 4.97 -162% | 3.8 -100% | 3.39 -78% | 5.9 -211% | 3.53 -86% |
| Gamma | 2.08 106% | 2.41 91% | 2.201 100% | 2.61 84% | 2.32 95% | |
| CCT | 6624 98% | 6473 100% | 7004 93% | 6941 94% | 7938 82% | 6368 102% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -29% /
-53% | -16% /
-23% | -62% /
-97% | -41% /
-68% | 1% /
-23% |
* ... smaller is better
我们的X-Rite色度计的测量结果证实了一个经过良好校准的sRGB显示器，其平均灰度和色彩deltaE值分别仅为1.9和1.48。这是我们在任何Chromebook 上看到的最准确的IPS面板之一，无论价格如何。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 46.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8167 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
在超过400尼特的情况下，显示屏比许多便宜的Chromebook更亮，因为200到300尼特是很常见的。随后，在阴凉处，户外能见度比平均水平好。一些眩光将始终存在，仍应避免阳光直射。
业绩
处理器
Chrome OS在搭载骁龙7c的平板电脑上运行基本流畅。在标签页之间切换或启动应用程序时，系统往往会出现短暂的颤动。跳帧很短，但还是很明显，特别是在长时间使用后。
4K视频在60FPS下的播放效果很差。我们长达1分钟的YouTube测试视频会返回超过2000个丢帧，而在大多数英特尔驱动的超极本上进行同样的测试会返回0个丢帧。对于使用这款平板电脑进行4K视频播放，你可能要三思而行。对于触摸屏的原生分辨率来说，1080p视频还是很流畅的。
值得一提的是，该系统搭载的是第一代骁龙7c SoC，而不是更新的第二代 第二代Snapdragon 7c.惠普表示，这是由于Chromebook x2 11的开发时间与高通芯片的可用性之间的关系。
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench ML: 0.5 TensorFlow Lite CPU 0.5 | 0.5 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI / Core ML
Sunspider: 1.0 Total Score
Octane V2: Total Score
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
WebXPRT 3: Overall
Jetstream 2: 2.0 Total Score
| Geekbench ML / 0.5 TensorFlow Lite CPU 0.5 | |
| Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5500FEA | |
| HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Duet Chromebook 10 CT-X636F | |
| Geekbench ML / 0.5 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI / Core ML | |
| Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5500FEA | |
| HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Duet Chromebook 10 CT-X636F | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark for Android / Work 3.0 | |
| Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5500FEA | |
| HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Duet Chromebook 10 CT-X636F | |
存储设备
考虑到价位和目标应用，传输率还算不错。更高端的Chromebooks，如戴尔Latitude 7410可以提供2到4倍于我们惠普平板电脑的固态硬盘性能。
| HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx 128 GB eMMC Flash | Dell Latitude 7410 Chromebook Enterprise SK hynix BC501A HFM128GDGTNG | Lenovo IdeaPad Duet Chromebook 10 CT-X636F 64 GB eMMC Flash | Motorola Edge 20 Lite 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | OnePlus Nord 2 5G 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Samsung Galaxy A22 5G 64 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drive Performance rating | ||||||
| Percent (pt) | 15.3 | 39.5 158% | 8.1 -47% | 55.2 261% | 99.8 552% | 28.6 87% |
| AndroBench 3-5 | 154% | -32% | 438% | 871% | 126% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 113.5 | 555 389% | 116.6 3% | 954 741% | 1827 1510% | 300.5 165% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 172.5 | 284.9 65% | 122.1 -29% | 478.3 177% | 1256 628% | 210.3 22% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 74.6 | 225.1 202% | 24.3 -67% | 141.4 90% | 223.7 200% | 118 58% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 19.2 | 11.7 -39% | 12.8 -33% | 161.9 743% | 239 1145% | 69.2 260% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 156% /
155% | -40% /
-35% | 350% /
402% | 712% /
807% | 107% /
118% |
GPU性能
图形性能与廉价的联发科Dimensity 700中的ARM Mali-G57 MP2最为相似。因此，Chromebook x2 11与廉价的Android 设备有更多共同之处，如三星Galaxy A22在图形能力方面比iPad或Galaxy S Tab更有共同之处。试图运行《源氏冲击》会导致持续的跳帧和音频故障，几乎无法播放。
排放
温度
如下面的温度图所示，后部中心附近的温度最热，那里的表面可以达到42℃以上。结果几乎与新的 微软Surface Go 3的温度差不多。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.9 °C / 82.2 F (-10.1 °C / -18.2 F).
发言人
HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
消耗功率
该系统非常省电，而且最类似于 联想IdeaPad Duet搭配Helio P60T。在游戏或运行极端处理负荷时，我们最多能够记录到11W以下，而典型的浏览负荷只需要大约4到7W。最低和最高亮度设置之间的差异大约是4W。
| Off / Standby |   0.25 / 1.9 Watt |
| Idle |  1.7 / 5.2 / 5.3 Watt |
| Load |
6.1 / 10.6 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx SD 7c, Adreno 618, 128 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 2160x1440, 11" | Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5500FEA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, , IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Latitude 7410 Chromebook Enterprise i5-10310U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix BC501A HFM128GDGTNG, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Acer Chromebook Spin 311 CP311-3H-K2RJ MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1366x768, 11.6" | Lenovo IdeaPad Duet Chromebook 10 CT-X636F Helio P60T, Mali-G72 MP3, 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Acer Chromebook Spin 713 CP713-2W-560V i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -92% | -141% | 19% | 5% | -128% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 1.7 | 3.4 -100% | 3.4 -100% | 1.7 -0% | 1.4 18% | 2.7 -59% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 5.2 | 6.5 -25% | 7.1 -37% | 3.6 31% | 4.5 13% | 5.5 -6% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 5.3 | 7.8 -47% | 7.2 -36% | 3.7 30% | 5.1 4% | 6.7 -26% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 6.1 | 12.5 -105% | 11.6 -90% | 5.5 10% | 7.5 -23% | 25 -310% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 10.6 | 30.1 -184% | 57.3 -441% | 8.3 22% | 9 15% | 36 -240% |
* ... smaller is better
电池寿命
在150尼特的亮度设置下，我们能够挤出不到9.5小时的实际WLAN使用时间，这与惠普宣称的11小时有一定差距。
由于32Wh的小电池，从空到满的充电速度非常快，只有60分钟左右。45瓦的USB-C交流适配器也可用于为其他USB-C设备或笔记本电脑充电。
| HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx SD 7c, Adreno 618, 32 Wh | Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5500FEA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 57 Wh | Dell Latitude 7410 Chromebook Enterprise i5-10310U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | Acer Chromebook Spin 311 CP311-3H-K2RJ MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 36.5 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Duet Chromebook 10 CT-X636F Helio P60T, Mali-G72 MP3, 27.6 Wh | Acer Chromebook Spin 713 CP713-2W-560V i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, 50.3 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | ||||||
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 9.4 | 9.4 0% | 12.5 33% | 13 38% | 12.6 34% | 10.3 10% |
Pros
Cons
判决书
Chromebook x2 11的最佳方面是它的触摸屏、出色的制造质量和可拆卸的脚架。明亮的显示屏经过良好的校准，具有全sRGB覆盖率和高对比度，在这个400美元以下的价格范围内很容易击败任何Chromebook 2合1。平板电脑和脚架的质量也很高，弯曲度最小，铰链也很牢固。机箱绝对更接近于专业的ElitePad，而不是廉价的Pavilion 平板电脑。
你会想利用明亮和色彩准确的11英寸触摸屏和USI笔来充分利用超轻的Chromebook x2 11。否则，一个更标准的Chromebook 转换器，如三星Galaxy 或 联想IdeaPad Flex 5 可以提供一个卓越的打字体验。
该模型最糟糕的方面是附带的键盘底座，打字时太容易弯曲了。反馈是海绵状的，浅薄的点击板同样不令人满意。如果你打算大量打字，请准备好你自己的键盘和鼠标。
HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx
- 10/20/2021 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
