微软Surface Go 3评测--紧凑的可折叠机现在有了Windows 11

Name: Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3
Brand: Microsoft

酷睿i3是否仍有足够的蒸汽？ 微软的开发人员显然对新的Surface Pro 8和Studio忙得不可开交，因为紧凑的Surface Go 3只得到了一个不同的处理器和切换到Windows 11的迷你更新。我们看了一下这在实践中是如何运作的。

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), Published 10/16/2021 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Business Convertible / 2-in-1 Touchscreen Windows

Test device courtesy of Microsoft Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3

Processor

Intel Core i3-10100Y 2 x 1.3 - 3.9 GHz, Amber Lake-Y

Graphics adapter

Intel UHD Graphics 615

Memory

8 GB

, LPDDR3-1866, Dual-Channel, onboard

Display

10.50 inch 3:2, 1920 x 1280 pixel 220 PPI, 10-Point Capacitive, native pen support, NV105WAM-N31, IPS , Corning Gorilla Glass 3, glossy: yes, detachable screen, 60 Hz

Mainboard

Intel Kaby Lake-U iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH

Storage

SK hynix HFB1M8MQ331C0MR, 128 GB

, 71 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 DisplayPort, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, Card Reader: microSD, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Light sensor, acceleration sensor, gyroscope

Networking

Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.3 x 245 x 175

Battery

28 Wh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Primary Camera: 5 MPix
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 24W PSU, 12 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

783 g, Power Supply: 157 g

Price

810 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
85.3 %	10/2021	Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 i3-10100Y, UHD Graphics 615	783 g	8.3 mm	10.50"	1920x1280
85.4 %	06/2020	Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y m3-8100Y, UHD Graphics 615	790 g	8.3 mm	10.50"	1920x1280
86.2 %	01/2021	Lenovo Tab P11 Pro SD 730G, Adreno 618	485 g	5.8 mm	11.50"	2560x1600
90.7 %	10/2020	Apple iPad Air 4 2020 A14, A14 Bionic GPU	458 g	6.1 mm	10.90"	2360x1640
88.4 %	04/2020	Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 i5-1035G4, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)	1.1 kg	8.5 mm	12.30"	2736x1824

外壳、设备和输入装置

Surface Go的外壳没有被改变，仍然以高质量的做工而令人信服。镁合金外壳非常坚固，各种可选的键盘盖可以实现一定程度的定制。我们评测样品的红色Alcantara盖子又要129欧元（约150美元）。然而，我们仍然喜欢发光的键盘。当然，由于设备紧凑，按键相对较小，但打字的感觉是清脆而精确的。

除了USB-C接口（也可用于充电），微软仍然依赖自己的Surface Connector，由于其方向性（电缆要么向上粘，要么挂在键盘周围），在实践中往往有点令人讨厌。WLAN的性能非常好，而且还有一个微型SD读卡器。

在网络摄像头方面，Surface Go 3比大多数笔记本有明显的优势，因为两个内置传感器（500万像素和800万像素）的图像质量简直是明显的好。一个新功能是额外的红外摄像头，现在还支持Windows Hello的面部识别。还为企业客户提供了一个LTE模块。

Size comparison

Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Apple iPad Air 4 2020 Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y DIN A4 ❌

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)	78.6 MB/s +4%
Average of class Convertible (17.7 - 209, n=35, last 2 years)	78.2 MB/s +3%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 (AV Pro V60)	75.6 MB/s
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)	73 MB/s -3%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	24.4 MB/s -68%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Convertible (22.6 - 263, n=34, last 2 years)	99 MB/s +28%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)	86.3 MB/s +12%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)	85.1 MB/s +10%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 (AV Pro V60)	77.1 MB/s

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1310 (1049^min - 1520^max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (447 - 1645, n=127)	1104 MBit/s -16%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	781 (691^min - 918^max) MBit/s -40%
Apple iPad Air 4 2020 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	645 (569^min - 750^max) MBit/s -51%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	645 (630^min - 659^max) MBit/s -51%
iperf3 receive AX12
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1498 (1260^min - 1694^max) MBit/s +9%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1376 (1210^min - 1538^max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (523 - 1684, n=128)	1191 MBit/s -13%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	555 (508^min - 597^max) MBit/s -60%
Apple iPad Air 4 2020 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	541 (500^min - 571^max) MBit/s -61%

Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1375 (1210-1538)

Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1309 (1049-1520)

ColorChecker Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3: 8.18 ∆E min: 2.53 - max: 14.63 ∆E

显示屏 - Surface Go继续采用3:2触摸屏

微软也没有对显示屏进行改动，甚至安装了相同的面板（NV105WAM-N31），分辨率为1,920 x 1,280像素，3:2格式。这使得紧凑的10.5英寸触摸屏上的图片非常清晰，面板的整体图片印象非常好。浑浊也不是一个大问题。

在测量方面，与前代产品相比几乎没有任何变化。略高于400cd/m²的亮度在许多情况下是足够的，但小面板在户外应该更亮，因为反射很快就能看到。

小的sRGB色彩空间被完全覆盖，面板在出厂状态下已经被校准得非常好。我们可以通过自己的校准来提高一些数值，但这并不是真的需要。因此，图片/视频也可以在Surface Go 3上合理地编辑。唯一的缺点仍然是在亮度为94%或更低时的PWM闪动。然而，916赫兹的频率相对较高，实际上不应该导致问题。


399 cd/m²	416 cd/m²	404 cd/m²
412 cd/m²	418 cd/m²	430 cd/m²
407 cd/m²	407 cd/m²	444 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

NV105WAM-N31 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 444 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 415.2 cd/m² Minimum: 5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 419 cd/m²
Contrast: 1493:1 (Black: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
69.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.21

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 NV105WAM-N31, IPS , 1920x1280, 10.50	Lenovo Tab P11 Pro OLED, 2560x1600, 11.50	Apple iPad Air 4 2020 IPS, 2360x1640, 10.90	Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 LG Philips LP123WQ112604, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.30	Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y NV105WAM-N31, IPS, 1920x1280, 10.50
Display				-4%	0%
Display P3 Coverage	69			66 -4%	68.7 0%
sRGB Coverage	99.1			93.8 -5%	100 1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	69.8			66.9 -4%	70.1 0%
Response Times		25%	-19%	710%	0%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	37.2 ?(18.4, 18.8)	4.4 ?(2, 2.4) 88%	46.8 ?(23.6, 23.2) -26%	34.8 ?(16.8, 18) 6%	37.2 ?(18.4, 18.8) -0%
Response Time Black / White *	22.8 ?(10.4, 12.4)	4 ?(2, 2) 82%	25.6 ?(12.4, 13.2) -12%	26.4 ?(13.2, 13.2) -16%	22.8 ?(10.4, 12.4) -0%
PWM Frequency	962 ?(94)	60.2 ?(100) -94%		21550 ?(24) 2140%	962 ?(94) 0%
Screen		-31%	-6%	-106%	18%
Brightness middle	418	372 -11%	509 22%	480.4 15%	404 -3%
Brightness	415	375 -10%	486 17%	485 17%	402 -3%
Brightness Distribution	90	95 6%	93 3%	91 1%	88 -2%
Black Level *	0.28		0.39 -39%	0.48 -71%	0.28 -0%
Contrast	1493		1305 -13%	1001 -33%	1443 -3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.2	1.8 -50%	1.3 -8%	5 -317%	0.7 42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.6	4.2 -62%	2.8 -8%	7.72 -197%	1.2 54%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1			2.44 -144%	0.7 30%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.8	2.8 -56%	2.2 -22%	5.9 -228%	1 44%
Gamma	2.21 ^100%	2.29 ^96%	2.21 ^100%	2.38 ^92%	2.15 ^102%
CCT	6225 ^104%	6718 ^97%	6833 ^95%	7805 ^83%	6485 ^100%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)			99.3	60.3	64.5
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)				93.2	99.7
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-3% / -12%	-13% / -9%	200% / 77%	6% / 11%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
22.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10.4 ms rise
22.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
37.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18.4 ms rise
37.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

962 Hz

≤ 94 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 962 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 94 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 962 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

性能、排放和电池寿命

现在可以选择安装Core m3-8100Y，而不是Core i3-10100Y。它仍然是一个被动冷却的处理器，有两个核心和四个线程，但它至少可以提供稳定的性能。总而言之，性能水平不是特别高，例如Apple ，iPad Air的处理能力要强得多。与旧的 m3-8100Y中的一个优势是 Surface Go 2也不存在。

新的Windows 11至少运行得相当流畅，但Surface Go 3显然只适用于简单的任务，多任务处理很快就把硬件推向了极限。特别是在启动应用程序时，总是有短暂的等待时间。与Android 或iOS相比，Windows 11提供了更多的可能性，但现在你也可以用这些平板电脑相当有成效地工作。默认情况下，Surface Go 3在S模式下配备了Windows 11（只能安装来自微软商店的应用程序），但你可以轻松地停用它。

视频播放没有问题（即使是高分辨率的视频），但Surface Go 3不适合游戏。只有来自微软商店的非常简单的游戏（纸牌游戏等）可以合理运行。

这款敞篷车是完全被动冷却的，因此是完全无声的。扬声器还不错，但不会变得特别响亮。Android 或iOS的竞争对手在电池寿命方面也有优势。在Wi-Fi测试中，Surface Go 3仅能运行7小时（或在全亮度下4：41小时）。

Cinebench R15 Multi Endurance test

Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 Intel Core i3-10100Y: Ø219 (217.41-220.31)

Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y Intel Core m3-8100Y: Ø218 (213.96-247.22)

Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 Intel Core i5-1035G4: Ø518 (495.42-684.65)

Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Convertible (616 - 18070, n=66, last 2 years)	9450 Points +587%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 Intel Core i3-10100Y	1375 Points
Average Intel Core i3-10100Y ()	1375 Points 0%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average of class Convertible (307 - 1970, n=66, last 2 years)	1590 Points +102%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 Intel Core i3-10100Y	788 Points
Average Intel Core i3-10100Y ()	788 Points 0%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Convertible (242 - 6954, n=66, last 2 years)	3561 Points +564%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 Intel Core i5-1035G4	1410 Points +163%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 Intel Core i3-10100Y	536 Points
Average Intel Core i3-10100Y ()	536 Points 0%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y Intel Core m3-8100Y	527 Points -2%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Convertible (116.8 - 755, n=65, last 2 years)	610 Points +101%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 Intel Core i5-1035G4	441 Points +46%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 Intel Core i3-10100Y	303 Points
Average Intel Core i3-10100Y ()	303 Points 0%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y Intel Core m3-8100Y	298 Points -2%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Convertible (110.1 - 2889, n=67, last 2 years)	1583 Points +620%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 Intel Core i5-1035G4	644 Points +193%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y Intel Core m3-8100Y	247 (213.96^min - 218.42^max) Points +12%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 Intel Core i3-10100Y	220 (217.41^min - 220.31^max) Points
Average Intel Core i3-10100Y ()	220 Points 0%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Convertible (68.6 - 287, n=65, last 2 years)	232 Points +90%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 Intel Core i5-1035G4	172 Points +41%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 Intel Core i3-10100Y	122 Points
Average Intel Core i3-10100Y ()	122 Points 0%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y Intel Core m3-8100Y	121 Points -1%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y Intel Core m3-8100Y	1893 Seconds * -4%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 Intel Core i3-10100Y	1825 Seconds *
Average Intel Core i3-10100Y ()	1825 Seconds * -0%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 Intel Core i5-1035G4	900 Seconds * +51%
Average of class Convertible (193 - 3620, n=61, last 2 years)	441 Seconds * +76%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Convertible (7703 - 72400, n=63, last 2 years)	39855 MIPS +382%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 Intel Core i5-1035G4	11030 MIPS +34%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 Intel Core i3-10100Y	8262 MIPS
Average Intel Core i3-10100Y ()	8262 MIPS 0%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y Intel Core m3-8100Y	7554 MIPS -9%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Convertible (2046 - 6417, n=63, last 2 years)	5177 MIPS +46%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 Intel Core i3-10100Y	3535 MIPS
Average Intel Core i3-10100Y ()	3535 MIPS 0%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y Intel Core m3-8100Y	3282 MIPS -7%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 Intel Core i5-1035G4	1307 MIPS -63%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Convertible (663 - 14016, n=67, last 2 years)	8263 Points +337%
Apple iPad Air 4 2020 Apple A14 Bionic	4334 Points +129%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 Intel Core i3-10100Y	1889 Points
Average Intel Core i3-10100Y ()	1889 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G	1764 Points -7%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y Intel Core m3-8100Y	1615 Points -15%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Convertible (319 - 1981, n=67, last 2 years)	1618 Points +64%
Apple iPad Air 4 2020 Apple A14 Bionic	1593 Points +62%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 Intel Core i3-10100Y	986 Points
Average Intel Core i3-10100Y ()	986 Points 0%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y Intel Core m3-8100Y	882 Points -11%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G	523 Points -47%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Convertible (0.61 - 20.1, n=65, last 2 years)	10.5 fps +422%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 Intel Core i5-1035G4	5.095 fps +153%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 Intel Core i3-10100Y	2.01 fps
Average Intel Core i3-10100Y ()	2.01 fps 0%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y Intel Core m3-8100Y	1.96 fps -2%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 Intel Core i3-10100Y	119 s *
Average Intel Core i3-10100Y ()	119 s * -0%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y Intel Core m3-8100Y	85.4 s * +28%
Average of class Convertible (42 - 223, n=63, last 2 years)	53.9 s * +55%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 Intel Core i3-10100Y	0.962 sec *
Average Intel Core i3-10100Y ()	0.962 sec * -0%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y Intel Core m3-8100Y	0.942 sec * +2%
Average of class Convertible (0.4102 - 1.967, n=63, last 2 years)	0.538 sec * +44%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Convertible (1486 - 7963, n=60, last 2 years)	5726 Points +126%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), i5-1035G4, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ256G	4163 Points +64%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y UHD Graphics 615, m3-8100Y, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G	2876 Points +13%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 UHD Graphics 615, i3-10100Y, SK hynix HFB1M8MQ331C0MR	2535 Points
Average Intel Core i3-10100Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615 ()	2535 Points 0%

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 UHD Graphics 615, i3-10100Y, SK hynix HFB1M8MQ331C0MR	3513 μs *
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y UHD Graphics 615, m3-8100Y, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G	1738 μs * +51%

* ... smaller is better

	Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 SK hynix HFB1M8MQ331C0MR	Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G	Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 64 GB eMMC Flash	Average SK hynix HFB1M8MQ331C0MR	Average of class Convertible
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		38%	-71%	0%	193%
Write 4K	90.8	100.6 11%	26.91 -70%	90.8 ?() 0%	148.4 ?(45.5 - 349, n=47, last 2 years) 63%
Read 4K	41.13	51.1 24%	19.72 -52%	41.1 ?() 0%	62.3 ?(27.7 - 95.8, n=47, last 2 years) 51%
Write Seq		801	126.2		2351 ?(402 - 4570, n=37, last 2 years)
Read Seq		1209	268		2650 ?(586 - 4763, n=37, last 2 years)
Write 4K Q32T1	199.4	270.8 36%	62.9 -68%	199.4 ?() 0%	384 ?(171.6 - 745, n=47, last 2 years) 93%
Read 4K Q32T1	251.6	307.2 22%	39.82 -84%	252 ?() 0%	487 ?(79.6 - 892, n=47, last 2 years) 94%
Write Seq Q32T1	372.9	853 129%	131.3 -65%	373 ?() 0%	3011 ?(412 - 5232, n=47, last 2 years) 707%
Read Seq Q32T1	1639	1776 8%	259.3 -84%	1639 ?() 0%	4330 ?(1974 - 7131, n=47, last 2 years) 164%
Write 4K Q8T8	234.8			235 ?() 0%	548 ?(162 - 1623, n=12, last 2 years) 133%
Read 4K Q8T8	316.7			317 ?() 0%	1071 ?(504 - 1962, n=12, last 2 years) 238%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Convertible (471 - 40768, n=65, last 2 years)	7870 Points +504%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), Intel Core i5-1035G4	3228 Points +148%
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-8100Y	1378 Points +6%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core i3-10100Y	1302 Points
Average Intel UHD Graphics 615 (821 - 1378, n=10)	1175 Points -10%

	low	med.	high	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)	9.3
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	57.2	25.9	12.9	11.6
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	8.06	6.26	6.09

温度

Max. Load

Idle


42.9 °C	46.1 °C	43.4 °C
42.1 °C	43.2 °C	41 °C
32.8 °C	35.2 °C	33.7 °C

Maximum: 46.1 °C
Average: 40 °C


41.7 °C	42.7 °C	40.5 °C
38.1 °C	39.6 °C	38.1 °C
33.8 °C	34.2 °C	32 °C

Maximum: 42.7 °C
Average: 37.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 37 °C | Room Temperature 20.1 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.1 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.2 °C / 95.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-7.1 °C / -12.8 F).

演讲者

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPad Air 4 2020 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源消耗

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.34 / 0.53 Watt
Idle	2.6 / 5.1 / 5.9 Watt
Load	22.9 / 24.6 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

Energy consumption Stress test

Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3: Ø22.7 (20.7-24.6)

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Apple iPad Air 4 2020 A14, A14 Bionic GPU, 28.6 Wh	702 min +67%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro SD 730G, Adreno 618, Wh	624 min +49%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 i5-1035G4, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), 45 Wh	597 min +42%
Average of class Convertible (329 - 876, n=62, last 2 years)	563 min +34%
Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 i3-10100Y, UHD Graphics 615, 28 Wh	420 min
Microsoft Surface Go 2, m3-8100Y m3-8100Y, UHD Graphics 615, 27 Wh	407 min -3%

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Edge 94)		7h 00min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 94)		4h 41min

Pros

+ 坚固的外壳

+ 显示屏具有非常准确的色彩表现

+ Wi-Fi 6 & microSD

+ 无声操作

+ 可选择使用LTE

Cons

- 低功率

- PWM闪动

- 平庸的电池寿命

- 只有1个USB-C接口

结论 - 最紧凑的Windows 11版本

Surface Go 3仍然是相当无敌的，因为几乎没有任何Windows转换机有这么小的显示屏。这个设备级别现在被Android 和iOS平板电脑所主导。微软的小型敞篷车在新的Windows 11系统下功能更全面，但你不应该期望太高，因为整体性能很低。Surface Go 3足以完成简单的任务，如浏览互联网、写邮件或看视频，但这对Android 或iOS平板电脑来说也是如此。

从 Surface Go 2是不值得的，因为新的酷睿i3处理器并没有提供任何额外的性能。这是由于被动冷却，但该设备至少在任何时候都是安静的。我们也仍然喜欢紧凑的键盘。

现在有了Windows 11，但除此之外没有真正的创新。Surface Go 3只是一个没有性能优势的迷你更新。

新的Windows 11运行流畅，所有的应用程序都可以在正常模式下安装（以S模式交付），但总的来说，800欧元（约928美元）的价格相当昂贵。对于许多用户来说，目前来自联想，三星或Apple 的平板电脑可能是更好的选择。

价格和可用性

Surface Go 3可以在Microsoft而我们的测试设备价格为679欧元（+129欧元/~788美元+~150美元的键盘）。在数码港等网上商店，目前只有配备奔腾处理器的较慢型号，售价599欧元(~$695).

Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 - 2021-10-15 10/15/2021 v7
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis

83 / 98 → 84%

Keyboard

80%

Pointing Device

89%

Connectivity

52 / 75 → 69%

Weight

79 / 20-75 → 100%

Battery

74%

Display

89%

Games Performance

34 / 78 → 43%

Application Performance

75 / 85 → 88%

Temperature

89%

Noise

100%

Audio

70 / 91 → 77%

Camera

46 / 85 → 55%

Average

74%

85%

Convertible - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 388017 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Translator: Stefan Hinum - Founder, CEO, CFO - 22299 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2006

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 微软Surface Go 3评测--紧凑的可折叠机现在有了Windows 11

Andreas Osthoff, 2021-10-16 (Update: 2021-10-16)

微软Surface Go 3评测--紧凑的可折叠机现在有了Windows 11

Possible competitors in comparison

外壳、设备和输入装置

Size comparison

显示屏 - Surface Go继续采用3:2触摸屏

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能、排放和电池寿命

Cinebench R15 Multi Endurance test

温度

演讲者

Microsoft Surface Go 3 Core i3 audio analysis

Apple iPad Air 4 2020 audio analysis

能源消耗

Energy consumption Stress test

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论 - 最紧凑的Windows 11版本

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare