偷工减料却大卖：Apple iPhone 17e 智能手机评测

Name: Apple iPhone 17e
Brand: Apple

不幸的是，这太棒了。

无论你喜欢与否，iPhone 17e 都有可能成为一款畅销产品。按照Apple 的标准，它价格低廉，而且客观地说，它提供的功能还不错，能让日常工作变得轻而易举。不过，与其他 iPhone 17 机型和一些价格不到其一半的竞争对手相比，它就显得不那么讨人喜欢了。
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 03/30/2026 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Apple iOS iPhone Smartphone Touchscreen

结论 -Apple iPhone 17e

iPhone 17e 的功能和性能使其成为一款优秀的智能手机。尽管与 iPhone 17 的 A19 相比缺少一个 GPU 内核，但 A19 SoC 的速度快得令人难以置信。OLED 屏幕不是特别亮，但足以满足日常使用。这款手机还配备了 4800 万像素主摄像头，与自拍摄像头类似，能拍摄出非常出色的照片和视频。256 GB 的机身存储容量是基本存储容量的两倍，而Apple 价格却没有提高。

Test device courtesy of Apple

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

与价格高得多的 iPhone 17 相比，iPhone 17e 缺少了一整套功能。它既没有超宽摄像头，也没有超宽带芯片。此外，你还会看到一个宽大的凹槽和厚厚的边框，而且屏幕只能以 60Hz 的频率运行，在 2026 年，除了Apple 之外，可能没有其他智能手机制造商敢于采用这一功能。

Pros

+ 高质量外壳，IP68 防护等级

+ 轻便小巧

+ 明亮、色彩准确的 OLED 屏幕

+ 双 eSIM 卡

+ 出色的 4800 万像素摄像头

+ 高性能

+ 电池寿命长

+ 软件更新时间长

Cons

- 只有 60 赫兹

- 没有超广角摄像头

- 没有 6 GHz 频段的 WiFi 6

- 蓝牙音频编解码器数量少

- 无 UWB 芯片

- 充电速度相对较慢

价格和供应情况

Apple iPhone 17e 可以从Apple起价 599 美元。在撰写评论时，该设备目前在亚马逊上还没有销售。

结论 -Apple iPhone 17e
规格
外壳 - 看起来仍像 iPhone 14
功能 - 既没有拍照按钮，也没有超宽带芯片
软件 - iPhone 17e 预装了 IOS 26 系统
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 6，不支持 6 GHz
电话功能和语音质量
摄像头 - iPhone 17 配备了非常出色的 4800 万像素融合摄像头
配件和保修 - 请自备充电器
输入设备和操作 - iPhone 17e 提供出色的生物识别功能
显示屏 - 回收的 iPhone 14 时代显示屏
性能 - GPU 内核减少一个，但速度仍然极快
排放物 - 炫酷的 iPhone
电池续航时间 - 不如 iPhone 16e 持久
Notebookcheck 总体评分
可能的替代品比较

iPhone 17e 继 iPhone 16e之后推出的 iPhone 17e，官方起价为 599 美元。产品名称中的 "e "没有官方含义。不过，根据不同的解释，它可能代表 "每个人"，使 iPhone 17e 成为一种 "人民的 iPhone"。当然，iPhone 17e 雄心勃勃的价格，以及其他制造商对具有类似功能和性能的智能手机收费低于 300 美元的事实，都是合理的反驳理由。我们的评测将揭示 iPhone 17e 是否仍然值得你花血汗钱购买。

规格

Apple iPhone 17e (iPhone 17 Series)

Processor

Apple A19 6c/6t, 2 x 4.3 GHz Apple A19 P-Core, 4 x 2.6 GHz Apple A19 E-Core

Graphics adapter

Apple A19 4-Core GPU

Memory

8 GB

Display

6.10 inch 19.5:9, 2532 x 1170 pixel 460 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, OLED, Super Retina XDR OLED, 800/1200 nits max. brightness (HDR), True Tone, Ceramic Shield 2, glossy: yes, HDR, 60 Hz

Storage

256 GB NVMe, 256 GB

, 236 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Face ID, barometer, high-dynamic-range gyro, high-G accelerometer, proximity sensor, magnetometer

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1.800, 1.900 MHz), 3G (850, 900, 1.700, 1.900, 2.100 MHz), 4G (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 53, 66), 5G (Band n1, n2, n3, n5, n7, n8, n12, n20, n25, n26, n28, n30, n38, n40, n41, n48, n53, n66, n70, n75, n77, n78, n79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.8 x 146.7 x 71.5

Battery

15.55 Wh, 4005 mAh Lithium-Ion, up to 20W wired charging, up to 15W Kabelloses Laden bis zu 15 W MagSafe/Qi2 charging

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Apple iOS 26

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix fusion camera (f/1.6, 26 mm, 1/2.55", 0.7 µm, OIS), video recording up to 4K@60fps
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/1.9, 23 mm, 1/3.6", 1.0 µm), video recording up to 4K@60fps

Additional features

Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, USB-C cable, SIM tool, documentation, 12 Months Warranty, Head SAR 1.20 W/kg, Body SAR 1.49 W/kg, fanless, waterproof

Weight

170 g

Price

699 Euro

Links

Apple homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

外壳 - 看起来仍像 iPhone 14

Apple iPhone 17e 的 IP68 认证保护壳与前代产品完全相同。从外观上看，它保持了与 iPhone 16e 相同的简约设计。 iPhone 16e磨砂背面上的单摄像头进一步加深了这一印象，有白色、黑色和浅粉色可供选择。iPhone 17 机型上的操作按钮也出现在 17e 上，但没有照相机按钮。

复古设计还体现在陶瓷盾牌 2 保护正面。与前代机型一样，iPhone 17e 也采用了与 iPhone 14 相同的标志性前面板。 iPhone 14.这包括一个非常宽的凹槽，用于放置自拍摄像头和相应的传感器。由于它在技术上也继承了 60Hz 显示屏，因此按照 2026 年的标准，边框明显较厚。

尺寸对比

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Honor Magic7 Pro Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Apple iPhone 17 Apple iPhone 17e Apple iPhone 16e DIN A6 ❌

功能 - 既没有拍照按钮，也没有超宽带芯片

虽然 iPhone 16e只能提供 128 GB 的基本存储空间，而 iPhone 17e 现在可以提供 256 GB 的存储空间，而且价格没有任何上涨。任何需要 512GB 以上存储空间的用户都必须选择Apple 生态系统中的 iPhone 17 机型。

256 GB 大容量存储：建议零售价 699 美元（iPhone 16e 为 699 美元）
512 GB 大容量存储：零售价 799 美元（iPhone 16e 为 899 美元）

在其他功能方面，iPhone 17e 与 17 型号相比始终存在差距。它的 USB-C 端口仍停留在 USB 2.0 的速度。它使用的是 Wi-Fi 6 和蓝牙 5.3，而不是 Wi-Fi 7 和蓝牙 6，而且缺少超宽带 (UWB) 芯片；它也无法精确搜索 AirTags 或其他Apple 设备。

软件 - iPhone 17e 预装了 IOS 26 系统

与 iPhone 17 的同类产品一样，iPhone 17e 搭载了 iOS 26 系统，预计将在同样长的时间内接受更新。虽然Apple 没有提供具体细节，但用户可以预期至少五年的更新时间。例如，尽管是在 2019 年发布，但 iPhone 11仍然收到了 iOS 26 的更新。

可持续性

根据产品环境报告iPhone 17e 由 30% 的可回收材料制成，使用 100% 的可回收钴，其电池含有 95% 的可回收锂。智能手机的包装不含塑料，100% 由木质纤维制成。

Apple 提供自我修复包括一本维修手册和一个提供原装替换零件和工具的在线商店。此外，智能手机也可以送修。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 6，不支持 6 GHz

据说，iPhone 17e 的 C1X 无线电芯片比 iPhone 16e 的 C1 快两倍。的两倍。.不过，它仍然不支持 6 GHz Wi-Fi。虽然 iPhone 17e 能够在华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 参考路由器上实现稳定的传输速度，但其最高 663 Mbps 的 Wi-Fi 速度实际上与其前代产品相差甚远。除此之外，竞争对手的速度明显更快。

注：GPS 测试将在更新后进行。

Networking
Apple iPhone 17e 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	530 (min: 479) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	663 (min: 621) MBit/s ∼42%
Apple iPhone 16e 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	765 (min: 732) MBit/s ∼77%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	727 (min: 715) MBit/s ∼46%
Apple iPhone 17 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	777 (min: 620) MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1592 (min: 1420) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1020 (min: 745) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1658 (min: 1579) MBit/s ∼100%
Honor Magic7 Pro Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	981 (min: 886) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	829 (min: 758) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1884 (min: 928) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1569 (min: 1486) MBit/s ∼95%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	989 (min: 488) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	946 (min: 814) MBit/s ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	949 (min: 474) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1006 (min: 504) MBit/s ∼63%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1589 (min: 808) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1188 (min: 1151) MBit/s ∼72%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	819 (min: 214) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	826 (min: 234) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1175 (min: 417) MBit/s ∼62%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1241 (min: 743) MBit/s ∼75%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	664 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼67%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	714 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1256 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼67%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1386 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼84%

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1562 (808-1664)

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1186 (1151-1206)

Apple iPhone 17e 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø530 (479-603)

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø934 (474-967)

Apple iPhone 17e 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø663 (621-708)

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø987 (504-1018)

电话功能和语音质量

iPhone 17e 支持 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话，并有一个 nano SIM 卡插槽。要使用双卡双待功能，可以激活额外的 eSIM 卡。此外，它还可以与两个 eSIM 一起使用。

在通话过程中，iPhone 17e 提供了良好的语音质量，并能可靠地抑制背景噪音。在免提模式下，我们的声音在接收器中听起来略微发闷，但清晰度仍然很高。

摄像头 - iPhone 17 配备了非常出色的 4800 万像素融合摄像头

Apple 在摄像头方面，这款手机采用了简约的设计，背面配备了一个 1200 万像素自拍摄像头（缺乏中心舞台功能）和一个 4800 万像素融合摄像头（f/1.6）。不过，这两个摄像头在日常情况下都能拍摄出质量非常好的照片和视频，后者能以每秒 60 帧的速度录制高达 4K 的视频。

偶尔使用智能手机拍摄照片和视频的用户可能会发现几乎没有什么不足之处。4800 万像素的主摄像头通过传感器裁剪模拟 2 倍光学变焦，在日常场景下可提供非常出色的效果。不过，当数码变焦级别达到 10 倍时，图像很快就会变得模糊。

有了 iPhone 17e，智能手机摄影师不得不放弃 iPhone 17 机型的一些相机功能。超广角摄像头的缺失不仅取消了一些创意摄影的可能性，还取消了微距拍摄和视频录制，以及电影和动作模式下的视频录制。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight image Daylight image Lowlight image

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

配件和保修 - 请自备充电器

iPhone 17e 随附一条 USB 线、一个 SIM 卡工具和几份信息宣传单。Apple 在线商店提供各种配件，如电源适配器、保护套和耳机。

Apple iPhone 17e 提供 12 个月的保修服务，您还可以选择购买额外的Apple Care+ 保护套。保护套

输入设备和操作 - iPhone 17e 提供出色的生物识别功能

尽管 iPhone 17e 的出色性能得益于其 A19SoC 的出色性能，但它带来的用户体验却略显生涩，至少对于那些习惯使用 120Hz 显示屏的用户来说是如此。究其原因，这款价格实惠的 2026 型 iPhone 的显示刷新率不高于 60Hz。

与其他 iPhone 17 机型相比，iPhone 17e 缺少实体照相机按键。不过，安全性与其他机型相当。iPhone 17e 和其他机型一样支持 Face ID，通过三维面部识别提供高级别的安全性，而且由于采用了红外传感器，即使在黑暗中也能快速可靠地工作。

显示屏 - 回收的 iPhone 14 时代显示屏

Apple 称，iPhone 17e 的 6.1 英寸 OLED 显示屏分辨率为 2532 x 1170 像素，最大亮度为 800 尼特（HDR 为 1200 尼特）。这些规格在 iPhone 14，这表明Apple 正在重复使用其显示屏。

按照 2026 年的标准，峰值亮度并不算高，但在日常使用中，只有在非常明亮的环境光下（如阳光直射）才会非常明显。

你肯定会注意到的是 OLED 屏幕非常均匀的照明和准确的色彩还原，亮度最高可达 839 cd/m²，在 HDR 下最高可达 1154 cd/m²。通过 HDR10、HDR10+、Dolby Vision 和 HLG，HDR 兼容性堪称典范。


835 cd/m²	833 cd/m²	834 cd/m²
839 cd/m²	837 cd/m²	835 cd/m²
836 cd/m²	831 cd/m²	832 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 839 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 834.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1.98 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 837 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.23 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.75}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.246
CCT: 6486 K

	Apple iPhone 17e OLED, 2532x1170, 6.1"	Apple iPhone 16e OLED, 2532x1170, 6.1"	Apple iPhone 17 OLED, 2622x1206, 6.3"	Honor Magic7 Pro OLED, 2800x1280, 6.8"	Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra AMOLED, 2608x1200, 6.9"	Samsung Galaxy S25 FE AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"
Screen		26%	13%	43%	35%	-40%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	837	833 0%	1138 36%	1607 92%	1771 112%	1136 36%
Brightness (cd/m²)	835	837 0%	1127 35%	1609 93%	1773 112%	1132 36%
Brightness Distribution (%)	99	99 0%	96 -3%	95 -4%	99 0%	98 -1%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.23	0.7 43%	1.07 13%	0.9 27%	1.3 -6%	3.5 -185%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.67	1.6 40%	2.99 -12%	1.8 33%	2.8 -5%	5.5 -106%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2	0.6 70%	1.8 10%	1.7 15%	2.1 -5%	2.4 -20%
Gamma	2.246 ^98%	2.19 ^100%	2.22 ^99%	2.24 ^98%	2.25 ^98%	2.02 ^109%
CCT	6486 ^100%	6525 ^100%	6516 ^100%	6346 ^102%	6452 ^101%	6322 ^103%

* ... smaller is better

Display: APL18 Peak Brightness | HDR Peak Brightness

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3519 cd/m² +205%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1863 cd/m² +61%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1634 cd/m² +42%
Apple iPhone 17e A19 4-Core GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	1154 cd/m²
Apple iPhone 16e A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe	832 cd/m² -28%

Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4697 cd/m² +290%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3458 cd/m² +187%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1990 cd/m² +65%
Apple iPhone 17e A19 4-Core GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	1203 cd/m²
Apple iPhone 16e A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe	1201 cd/m² 0%

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

60 Hz
Amplitude: 14 %

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7962 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

以固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置进行的一系列测量（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看似平缓，但这是缩放造成的。最小亮度下的振幅放大图可在信息框中查看）。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
3.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.7 ms rise
3.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.7 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2.4 ms rise
4.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.9 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.3 ms).

性能 - GPU 内核减少一个，但速度仍然极快

撠 A19iPhone 17e 的 SoC 只有 4 个 GPU 内核，而不是 5 个。不过，这在日常使用中并不重要，因为它仍然是目前速度最快的智能手机处理器之一，可以非常流畅地运行游戏（限制为 60fps），其性能储备在未来几年应该绰绰有余。

Geekbench 6.6 | Antutu v11 | AImark | Geekbench AI

Geekbench 6.6
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192	3732 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	3676 Points +4%
Average Apple A19 (3538 - 3744, n=3)	3671 Points +4%
Apple iPhone 17e Apple A19, A19 4-Core GPU, 8192	3538 Points
Apple iPhone 16e Apple A18, A18 GPU, 8192	3338 Points -6%
Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	3050 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192	2118 Points -40%
Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3883, n=195, last 2 years)	1748 Points -51%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	11004 Points +22%
Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192	9456 Points +5%
Average Apple A19 (9036 - 9456, n=3)	9310 Points +3%
Apple iPhone 17e Apple A19, A19 4-Core GPU, 8192	9036 Points
Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	9019 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 16e Apple A18, A18 GPU, 8192	8044 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192	6839 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone (830 - 11811, n=195, last 2 years)	5169 Points -43%

Antutu v11 - Score
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	3753628 Points +85%
Average of class Smartphone (584158 - 4273120, n=23, last 2 years)	2313768 Points +14%
Apple iPhone 17e Apple A19, A19 4-Core GPU, 8192	2030480 Points
Average Apple A19 (n=1)	2030480 Points 0%

AImark - Score v3.x
Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192	35717 Points +3%
Average Apple A19 (34778 - 35717, n=2)	35248 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 17e Apple A19, A19 4-Core GPU, 8192	34778 Points
Apple iPhone 16e Apple A18, A18 GPU, 8192	30473 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=94, last 2 years)	16895 Points -51%
Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	1796 Points -95%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192	1206 Points -97%

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.7
Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192	4677 Points +5%
Average Apple A19 (4471 - 4677, n=2)	4574 Points +2%
Apple iPhone 17e Apple A19, A19 4-Core GPU, 8192	4471 Points
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5210, n=86, last 2 years)	724 Points -84%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	559 Points -87%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192	324 Points -93%
Half Precision NPU 1.7
Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192	35502 Points +1%
Average Apple A19 (35139 - 35502, n=2)	35321 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 17e Apple A19, A19 4-Core GPU, 8192	35139 Points
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 36297, n=86, last 2 years)	3004 Points -91%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	561 Points -98%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192	342 Points -99%
Quantized NPU 1.7
Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192	48896 Points +1%
Average Apple A19 (48271 - 48896, n=2)	48584 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 17e Apple A19, A19 4-Core GPU, 8192	48271 Points
Average of class Smartphone (133 - 49889, n=86, last 2 years)	4409 Points -91%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	1285 Points -97%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192	1096 Points -98%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6959 Points +76%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5933 Points +50%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	4904 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4142 Points +5%
Apple iPhone 17e A19 4-Core GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	3946 Points
Apple iPhone 16e A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe	2827 Points -28%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	7021 Points +83%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5800 Points +51%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	5022 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4421 Points +15%
Apple iPhone 17e A19 4-Core GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	3838 Points
Apple iPhone 16e A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe	3330 Points -13%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	30621 Points +75%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	23837 Points +36%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	21785 Points +25%
Apple iPhone 17e A19 4-Core GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	17472 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	15464 Points -11%
Apple iPhone 16e A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe	14024 Points -20%

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	13036 Points +64%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	10197 Points +28%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	10066 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	8797 Points +11%
Apple iPhone 17e A19 4-Core GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	7942 Points
Apple iPhone 16e A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe	6120 Points -23%

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	12242 Points +47%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	10634 Points +28%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	10389 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	8714 Points +5%
Apple iPhone 17e A19 4-Core GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	8314 Points
Apple iPhone 16e A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe	5557 Points -33%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2704 Points +60%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2248 Points +33%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	2124 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1944 Points +15%
Apple iPhone 17e A19 4-Core GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	1693 Points
Apple iPhone 16e A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe	1149 Points -32%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2736 Points +57%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2272 Points +30%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	2197 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2017 Points +16%
Apple iPhone 17e A19 4-Core GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	1742 Points
Apple iPhone 16e A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe	1517 Points -13%

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Apple iPhone 17e (Safari Mobile 26)	339.835 Points
Average Apple A19 (336 - 340, n=2)	338 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 17 (Safari Mobile 26)	335.933 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 16e (Safari 18)	299.928 Points -12%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)	284.674 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (Chrome 141.0.7390.43)	210.247 Points -38%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra (Chrome 143)	165.891 Points -51%
Average of class Smartphone (23.8 - 358, n=125, last 2 years)	149.7 Points -56%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Apple iPhone 17 (Safari Mobile 26)	599 runs/min +6%
Average Apple A19 (563 - 599, n=2)	581 runs/min +3%
Apple iPhone 17e (Safari Mobile 26)	563 runs/min
Apple iPhone 16e (Safari 18)	550 runs/min -2%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)	419 runs/min -26%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (Chrome 141.0.7390.43)	366 runs/min -35%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 643, n=98, last 2 years)	223 runs/min -60%

Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Apple iPhone 17 (Safari Mobile 26)	39.6 runs/min +7%
Average Apple A19 (36.9 - 39.6, n=2)	38.3 runs/min +4%
Apple iPhone 17e (Safari Mobile 26)	36.9 runs/min
Apple iPhone 16e (Safari 18)	33.3 runs/min -10%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)	26.1 runs/min -29%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra (Chrome 143)	25.1 runs/min -32%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (Chrome 141.0.7390.43)	20.6 runs/min -44%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 42.8, n=108, last 2 years)	14.1 runs/min -62%

WebXPRT 5 - Overall
Apple iPhone 17e (Safari Mobile 26)	83 Points
Average Apple A19 (n=1)	83 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 83, n=5, last 2 years)	52 Points -37%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 17 (Safari Mobile 26)	110696 Points +3%
Average Apple A19 (107056 - 110696, n=2)	108876 Points +2%
Apple iPhone 17e (Chrome 146)	107056 Points
Apple iPhone 16e (Safari 18)	97104 Points -9%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)	89248 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (Chrome 141.0.7390.43)	78009 Points -27%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra (Chrome 143)	58421 Points -45%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 126661, n=168, last 2 years)	47766 Points -55%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=136, last 2 years)	1187 ms * -305%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra (Chrome 143)	522.8 ms * -78%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (Chrome 141.0.7390.43)	483 ms * -65%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)	429.4 ms * -47%
Apple iPhone 17e (Chrome 146)	292.9 ms *
Apple iPhone 16e (Safari 18)	287.8 ms * +2%
Average Apple A19 (263 - 293, n=2)	278 ms * +5%
Apple iPhone 17 (Safari Mobile 26)	263.1 ms * +10%

* ... smaller is better

排放物 - 炫酷的 iPhone

温度

在日常使用中，如浏览网页、拍照和使用 WhatsApp 时，iPhone 17e 仍然保持凉爽。在我们的测试中，我们不得不让它长时间承受大负荷，某些区域的表面温度才高达 42°C。与此同时，SoC 性能明显下降，这在基准测试（如 3DMark 压力测试）中非常明显。

Max. Load

Idle


36.1 °C	37.5 °C	37.3 °C
37.8 °C	38 °C	37.8 °C
39.1 °C	40.2 °C	37.8 °C

Maximum: 40.2 °C
Average: 38 °C


34.6 °C	39.1 °C	37.5 °C
35.5 °C	40.2 °C	38.5 °C
36.5 °C	42.1 °C	40.5 °C

Maximum: 42.1 °C
Average: 38.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 41.9 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	96.8 % +6%
Apple iPhone 17e A19 4-Core GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	91.7 %
Apple iPhone 16e A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe	83 % -9%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	57.6 % -37%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	53.4 % -42%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Apple iPhone 16e A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe	82.5 % +25%
Apple iPhone 17e A19 4-Core GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	66.2 %
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	65.4 % -1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	53.8 % -19%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 16e A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe	95.2 % +40%
Apple iPhone 17e A19 4-Core GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	68 %
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	66.1 % -3%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	55.8 % -18%
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	% -100%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 16e A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe	75 % +9%
Apple iPhone 17e A19 4-Core GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	68.7 %
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	68.4 % 0%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	65.4 % -5%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	59.7 % -13%

Apple iPhone 17e A19 4-Core GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø18 (16.2-24.4)

Apple iPhone 16e A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.6 (14-17)

Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø21.8 (18.6-28.5)

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø16.4 (13.9-25.8)

Apple iPhone 17e A19 4-Core GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø57.4 (55-60)

Apple iPhone 16e A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø50.2 (49-59)

Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø59.6 (58.1-60)

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø57.8 (47.6-89.1)

Apple iPhone 17e A19 4-Core GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø78.1 (68.2-105)

Apple iPhone 16e A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø55 (51-83.2)

Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø99.9 (92-127.2)

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø68.2 (53-90.1)

Apple iPhone 16e A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.7 (14.2-17.4)

Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø26.1 (21.9-33.8)

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.2: Ø19.6 (16.4-29.1)

Apple iPhone 17e A19 4-Core GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø20.7 (18.4-27)

Apple iPhone 16e A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.5 (14.1-14.8)

Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø25.5 (21.5-32.6)

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.2: Ø18.5 (15.8-28.3)

Apple iPhone 17e A19 4-Core GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø10.4 (9.46-13.8)

Apple iPhone 16e A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.88 (7.52-10)

Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø12.1 (10.3-15.7)

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.1: Ø9.81 (8.65-14.5)

发言人

两个板载扬声器能产生平衡的声场，很好地传达声音和音乐。不过，音量越大，两个扬声器的声音就越尖锐。

USB-C 端口可用于有线音频输出。可通过蓝牙 5.3 实现无线音频，不过除 SBC 外，只支持Apple 的 AAC 编解码器。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Apple iPhone 17e audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - 不如 iPhone 16e 持久

耗电量

iPhone 17e 的 4005 毫安时电池可以 15 瓦的功率进行无线充电，另外还支持 MagSafe。Apple 声称，30 分钟后电池容量应达到 50%，我们的测试也是如此。充满电大约需要 1 小时 20 分钟。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	0.9 / 1.2 / 1.6 Watt
Load	6.9 / 12.2 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Apple iPhone 17e 4005 mAh	Apple iPhone 16e 4005 mAh	Apple iPhone 17 3692 mAh	Honor Magic7 Pro 5270 mAh	Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra 6500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S25 FE 4900 mAh	Average Apple A19	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		3%	-6%	-17%	2%	-4%	-3%	-2%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	0.9	0.68 24%	1.1 -22%	0.94 -4%	0.87 3%	0.87 3%	1 ?(0.9 - 1.1, n=2) -11%	0.876 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=136, last 2 years) 3%
Idle Average * (Watt)	1.2	1.89 -58%	1.3 -8%	1.5 -25%	1.29 -8%	1.48 -23%	1.25 ?(1.2 - 1.3, n=2) -4%	1.462 ?(0.7 - 4.36, n=136, last 2 years) -22%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	1.6	1.93 -21%	1.5 6%	1.57 2%	1.33 17%	1.52 5%	1.55 ?(1.5 - 1.6, n=2) 3%	1.657 ?(0.75 - 4.46, n=136, last 2 years) -4%
Load Average * (Watt)	6.9	3.77 45%	7.6 -10%	11.03 -60%	8.84 -28%	6.76 2%	7.25 ?(6.9 - 7.6, n=2) -5%	6.53 ?(2.9 - 14.7, n=107, last 2 years) 5%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	12.2	9.04 26%	12 2%	11.68 4%	9.15 25%	12.89 -6%	12.1 ?(12 - 12.2, n=2) 1%	11 ?(4.75 - 22, n=107, last 2 years) 10%

* ... smaller is better

耗电量：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Apple iPhone 17e Apple A19; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.53 (0.988-14.3)

Apple iPhone 16e Apple A18; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.54 (0.916-10.5)

Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.55 (0.1947-11.8)

Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.39 (1.043-11.7)

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.37 (0.963-9.17)

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø8.7 (1.077-16.6)

Apple iPhone 17e Apple A19; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.224 (1.119-1.64)

Apple iPhone 16e Apple A18; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.829 (0.803-0.969)

Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.166 (1.097-1.253)

Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.012 (0.876-1.149)

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.983 (0.9-1.319)

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.038 (0.987-1.247)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Apple iPhone 16e Apple A18; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.01 (3.15-4.95)

Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.6 (9.06-12)

Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.4 (11.1-11.7)

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.08 (9.02-9.14)

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø12.5 (6.73-15.5)

Apple iPhone 17e Apple A19; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.224 (1.119-1.64)

Apple iPhone 16e Apple A18; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.829 (0.803-0.969)

Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.166 (1.097-1.253)

Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.012 (0.876-1.149)

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.983 (0.9-1.319)

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.038 (0.987-1.247)

电池运行时间

在负载情况下，iPhone 17e 的平均耗电量要高于前代产品，这也是其电池续航时间不尽如人意的原因。

在我们的 Wi-Fi 网页浏览测试中，iPhone 17e 的续航时间超过 19 小时，表现非常出色，但 iPhone 16e 的续航时间则超过 23 小时。 iPhone 16e的续航能力要强一些。无论如何，iPhone 17e 都能让你轻松地度过一天，即使是在高强度使用的情况下。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing		19h 25min

Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3
Apple iPhone 17e 4005 mAh	19.4 h
Apple iPhone 16e 4005 mAh	23.2 h
Apple iPhone 17 3692 mAh	20.1 h
Honor Magic7 Pro 5270 mAh	24.7 h
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra 6500 mAh	21.9 h
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE 4900 mAh	15.1 h

Notebookcheck 总体评分

iPhone 17e 拥有不错的功能组合，包括足够明亮的 60Hz 显示屏、不错的摄像头、较长的电池续航时间和 MagSafe 充电功能。不过，它缺少超宽摄像头和超宽带芯片。

Back to the verdict

Apple iPhone 17e - 03/26/2026 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

88%

Keyboard

66 / 75 → 88%

Pointing Device

89%

Connectivity

47 / 69 → 69%

Weight

92%

Battery

92%

Display

90%

Games Performance

34 / 55 → 62%

Application Performance

94 / 85 → 100%

AI Performance

95%

Temperature

90%

Noise

100%

Audio

79 / 90 → 88%

Camera

78%

Average

81%

84%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
88.7%

Materials
50%

Packaging
95%

Power Use
95.8%

Repairability
70%

Software Updates
83.5%

Total Sustainability Score: 80.5%

可能的替代品比较

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 84%	Apple iPhone 17e Apple A19 ⎘ Apple A19 4-Core GPU ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB NVMe	Amazon: List Price: 699 Euro	170 g	256 GB NVMe	6.10" 2532x1170 460 PPI OLED
2. 84.1%	Apple iPhone 16e Apple A18 ⎘ Apple A18 GPU ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB NVMe	Amazon: List Price: 699 Euro	167 g	128 GB NVMe	6.10" 2532x1170 460 PPI OLED
3. 87.9%	Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19 ⎘ Apple A19 GPU ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB NVMe	Amazon: List Price: 949 Euro	177 g	256 GB NVMe	6.30" 2622x1206 460 PPI OLED
4. 89.2%	Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB	Amazon: $960.00 List Price: 1300€	223 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.80" 2800x1280 453 PPI OLED
5. 88.2%	Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB	Amazon: List Price: 900€	220 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.90" 2608x1200 416 PPI AMOLED
6. 85.6%	Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 940 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB	List Price: 809€	190 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.70" 2340x1080 382 PPI AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!

偷工减料却大卖：Apple iPhone 17e 智能手机评测

不幸的是，这太棒了。

结论 -Apple iPhone 17e

Pros

Cons

价格和供应情况

Table of Contents

规格

外壳 - 看起来仍像 iPhone 14

尺寸对比

功能 - 既没有拍照按钮，也没有超宽带芯片

软件 - iPhone 17e 预装了 IOS 26 系统

可持续性

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 6，不支持 6 GHz

电话功能和语音质量

摄像头 - iPhone 17 配备了非常出色的 4800 万像素融合摄像头

配件和保修 - 请自备充电器

输入设备和操作 - iPhone 17e 提供出色的生物识别功能

显示屏 - 回收的 iPhone 14 时代显示屏

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - GPU 内核减少一个，但速度仍然极快

排放物 - 炫酷的 iPhone

温度

3DMark 压力测试

发言人

Apple iPhone 17e audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE audio analysis

电池续航时间 - 不如 iPhone 16e 持久

耗电量

耗电量：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

电池运行时间

Notebookcheck 总体评分

可能的替代品比较

Transparency

More articles related to this device

Related Articles