Notebookcheck Logo
vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 智能手机评测
ⓘ Notebookcheck (Marcus Herbrich)

智能手机不需要的独特功能:vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 评测

满嘴跑火车。

vivo 的新旗舰杀手锏是以游戏和强劲性能为设计理念。为了实现这一目标,它将骁龙 8 Elite Gen 5 与 24GB RAM 相结合,甚至还在智能手机的机身中集成了一个风扇。遗憾的是,尽管价格实惠,但它却失去了一项出色的功能。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone Wi-Fi 7

对 vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 的评价

iQOO 15 Ultra 为智能手机提出了一个基本问题:手机真的需要像笔记本电脑那样的集成风扇吗?结果并非如此。至少就目前而言,我们看不到 vivo 的做法有任何真正的附加值。即使在 Ultra 机型中,风扇本应控制的骁龙 8 Elite Gen 5 仍然会出现明显的跳动。目前也缺乏有意义的使用场景。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

不过,我们的评测也揭示了这一突出功能之外的许多亮点。XXL 电池能让游戏手机长时间运行,而且可以快速充电。扬声器系统非常出色,而高级机身、超声波指纹传感器和一流的振动马达则使其外观和手感极具说服力。

对于一款游戏手机来说,摄像头,或者说制造商的摄像头算法,出乎意料地好。在照片质量方面,iQOO 15 Ultra 让 iPhone 17 看起来像一款廉价的中端手机。

Pros

+ IP69 等级的优质机壳
+ 肩部按钮和 LED 灯带等游戏功能
+ 超声波指纹传感器
+ 明亮的 1440p OLED 面板
+ 电池寿命长
+ 出色的摄像头
+ 快速 SoC

Cons

- 尽管有风扇,但仍在节流
- 相当重
- 只能进口
- 更新政策不明确

vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 的价格和上市时间

iQOO 15 Ultra 目前只在中国上市。基本机型的起价为 5699 元人民币,约合 700 欧元。vivo 尚未公布任何有关可能在国际市场推出的细节。作为进口产品,目前深圳交易市场的起价为,约合 800 欧元。.

vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 的规格

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (iQOO 15 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 8c/8t, 2 x 4.6 GHz Qualcomm Oryon Gen 3 Prime, 6 x 3.6 GHz Qualcomm Oryon Gen 3 Performance, Oryon v3
Graphics adapter
Memory
16 GB 
Display
6.85 inch 19.8:9, 3168 x 1440 pixel 508 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, OLED, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash, 1024 GB 
, 928 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, GSM:850/900/1800/1900MHz; 3G:B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19; 4G TD-LTE:B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B43/B48; FDD-LTE:B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28A/B28B/B32/B66; 5G: n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n12/n18/n20/n25/n26/n28A/n28B/n38/n40/n41/n48/n66/n75/n77/n78/n79/n80/n81/n83/n84/n89/n91/n92/n93/n94, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.7 x 163.7 x 76.8
Battery
7400 mAh Silicon-Carbon
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 16
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.9, 23 mm, 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS) + 50 MPix (f/2.7, 85 mm, tele, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom, 1/1.95") + 50 MPix (f/2.1, 15 mm, ultrawide, 1/2.76")
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.2, 21 mm)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, charger, case, USB cable, OriginOS, 12 Months Warranty, HDR: Dolby Vision, HDR10, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, HLG; GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), waterproof
Released
02/04/2026
Weight
227 g, Power Supply: 110 g
Price
800 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳和功能:Android 手机,带 LED 灯带

iQOO 15 Ultra 的颜色
ⓘ Vivo
iQOO 15 Ultra 的颜色

Ultra 机型的设计与 iQOO 15 非常相似,但作为旗舰手机的 15 系列现在后部采用了醒目的蜂窝状图案,有白色和黑色可供选择。方形摄像头模块还配有彩色 LED 灯带,可以发出接收通知的信号。尽管如此,我们还是喜欢 LED环要好得多。

这种取舍是因为 iQOO 15 Ultra 配备了集成风扇。这款游戏手机的主动散热也对其重量产生了负面影响,因为机身相当重,达到 227 克。

但在防水方面却没有任何影响。尽管有风扇,这款 vivo 手机还是通过了 IP69 防水认证。Ultra 机型在制造质量方面也完全令人信服。

除了自制的 Q3 游戏芯片外,iQOO 15 Ultra 还采用了 LPDDR5X Ultra Pro,它比标准的 LPDDR5X 内存具有更高的数据传输速率。两个触摸式肩部按键可用作游戏控制,这也体现了它对游戏的关注。

此外,还配备了 NFC 芯片、USB OTG、红外端口和快速 USB Type-C 3.2 端口。

连接和功能:配备 Wi-Fi 7 和超声波指纹传感器的 vivo 手机

iQOO 15 Ultra 提供蓝牙 5.4 和 Wi-Fi 7,不过在我们的中国评测机上,对快速 6 GHz 频段的访问受到限制。在我们测试的每个路由器上,vivo 手机都无法连接到 6 GHz 频道,数据吞吐量相对较低。

除了支持双卡双待外,vivo 手机还覆盖了重要的 LTE 频段,如 Band 20 和 28,以及广泛的 5G 频段。

对于一款游戏手机来说,出色的超声波指纹传感器和超强的振动马达都是不言而喻的。

Networking
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
620 (min: 521) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1503 (min: 1318) MBit/s ∼100%
Realme GT 8 Pro
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
948 (min: 893) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
879 (min: 820) MBit/s ∼83%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
989 (min: 488) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
946 (min: 814) MBit/s ∼90%
Vivo iQOO 15
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
810 (min: 606) MBit/s ∼64%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1254 (min: 860) MBit/s ∼83%
Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
958 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1056 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1245 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1464 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼97%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
687 (min: 52.5) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
729 (min: 52.2) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1274 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1394 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼93%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650Tooltip
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø620 (521-826)
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1503 (1318-1670)
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø973 (488-1013)
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø945 (814-965)

软件和可持续性:配备Android 16 的游戏智能手机

尽管是中文版,但 iQOO 15 Ultra 支持包括英语在内的多种界面语言。OriginOS 6 基于Android 16,可以顺利使用 Google Play Store 和Android Auto。不过,这两个应用程序都不是开箱即用的,必须由用户安装或激活。中文应用程序可以卸载,但某些软件限制,如不支持 eSIM、Wear OS 手表兼容性和中国特有的人工智能功能,则无法解决。

有人提出了五年的更新期限,但我们无法核实任何官方细节。

在透明度方面也有改进的余地,因为没有关于所使用的可回收材料比例的具体细节。不过,包装似乎不含塑料。

摄像头:配备 OIS 和长焦镜头的游戏旗舰手机

使用 3200 万像素摄像头自拍
使用 3200 万像素摄像头自拍

iQOO 15 Ultra 在摄像头硬件方面的取舍比其他游戏旗舰少,例如 RedMagic 11 Pro.除了 5000 万像素超广角摄像头外,vivo 还为其配备了一枚极具吸引力的 5000 万像素长焦镜头,具有 3 倍光学变焦和 OIS 功能。

5000 万像素的主摄像头采用 1/1.56 英寸传感器,支持光学防抖,可拍摄出锐利、高对比度的照片。对于一款主打游戏的智能手机来说,其非常好的动态范围也是理所当然的。让我们来看看 iQOO 15 Ultra 的弱光照片与 iPhone 17 的对比吧 iPhone 17可以看出 vivo 的相机软件已经变得多么出色。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraLow LightUltraweitwinkel
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
6 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
8 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra: 6.58 ∆E min: 1.87 - max: 11.89 ∆E
ColorChecker
13.8 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
15 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
11 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
10 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
17 ∆E
10 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra: 11.56 ∆E min: 6.55 - max: 16.96 ∆E

显示屏:Android ,配备 OLED 大屏幕手机

6.85 英寸 LTPO AMOLED 面板的工作频率为 144 Hz,由于分辨率高达 1440p,像素密度超过 500 ppi。根据制造商的说法,该显示屏的峰值亮度可达 2,600 尼特,尽管在我们的 APL18 测量中略有不足。vivo 还宣称 HDR 亮度达到了令人印象深刻的 8000 尼特。

iQOO 15 Ultra 在高亮度级别使用直流调光,在低亮度级别使用 PWM 调光,频率为 2,160 Hz,以减少 OLED 闪烁的负面影响。不过,我们测得的基本频率仅为 120 Hz,这意味着不能排除脉宽调制引起的健康问题。

1503
cd/m²
1526
cd/m²
1534
cd/m²
1555
cd/m²
1579
cd/m²
1542
cd/m²
1562
cd/m²
1523
cd/m²
1511
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1579 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1537.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 1579 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 0.74 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.74}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.1 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.99}
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.252
CCT: 6556 K
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
OLED, 3168x1440, 6.9"
Realme GT 8 Pro
AMOLED, 3136x1440, 6.8"
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
AMOLED, 2608x1200, 6.9"
Vivo iQOO 15
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.9"
Screen
-28%
-32%
-56%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
1579
1896
20%
1771
12%
1137
-28%
Brightness (cd/m²)
1537
1891
23%
1773
15%
1113
-28%
Brightness Distribution (%)
95
96
1%
99
4%
96
1%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.74
1.1
-49%
1.3
-76%
1.52
-105%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.8
3.1
-72%
2.8
-56%
3.05
-69%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.1
2.1
-91%
2.1
-91%
2.3
-109%
Gamma
2.252 98%
2.19 100%
2.25 98%
2.265 97%
CCT
6556 99%
6594 99%
6452 101%
6560 99%

* ... smaller is better

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3519 cd/m² +80%
Vivo iQOO 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2885 cd/m² +48%
Realme GT 8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
1966 cd/m² +1%
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash
1955 cd/m²
Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash
3984 cd/m²
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3458 cd/m² -13%
Realme GT 8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2078 cd/m² -48%

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 16 %

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7920 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低亮度
最低亮度
25% 亮度
25% 亮度
50% 亮度
50% 亮度
75% 亮度
75% 亮度
100% 亮度
100% 亮度

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图)

色彩准确度(色彩模式:专业,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩准确度(色彩模式:专业,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(色彩模式:专业,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(色彩模式:专业,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(色彩模式:专业,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(色彩模式:专业,目标色彩空间:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
0.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.3 ms rise
↘ 0.3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.2 ms rise
↘ 0.3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.3 ms).

性能、排放和电池寿命:vivo 手机采用高通公司的高端 SoC

iQOO 15 Ultra 配备了 骁龙 8 第五代精英处理器可在需要时通过 17 x 17 毫米风扇散热。这样做的目的是让旗舰 SoC 即使在持续负载的情况下也能充分发挥潜力。然而,在日常使用中,效果却不如预期。

在 3DMark 压力测试中,Ultra 型号的稳定性并没有明显优于其 兄弟机型在 3DMark 压力测试中,Ultra 机型的稳定性并没有明显优于其同类机型,尽管它能获得更高的性能。在负载情况下,我们测得的平均后部表面温度超过 47 °C,也明显高于 ROG Phone 9 Pro。 ROG Phone 9 Pro的 44.4 °C,尽管后者没有风扇。因此,vivo 智能手机的主动散热功能并不能改变游戏规则。

除此之外,iQOO 15 Ultra 的基准测试结果也很出色,在 GPU 测试中表现尤为突出。在某些情况下 Adreno 840甚至创造了新的最佳成绩。

这款游戏手机内置 7,400 毫安时的大容量电池,可通过 USB-C 接口以高达 100 瓦的功率充电,或以 40 瓦的功率无线充电。在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中,尽管 iQOO 15 Ultra 采用了 144 Hz 显示屏和 1440p 分辨率,但其续航时间仍超过了 28 小时。

Geekbench 6.6
Single-Core
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
3728 Points
Realme GT 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
3689 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
3676 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (3498 - 3831, n=14)
3674 Points -1%
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
3613 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3883, n=195, last 2 years)
1794 Points -52%
Multi-Core
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
11811 Points
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
11178 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (9979 - 12383, n=14)
11122 Points -6%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
11004 Points -7%
Realme GT 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
10975 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 11811, n=195, last 2 years)
5310 Points -55%
3DMark
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
30892 Points
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
30621 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (23088 - 30892, n=12)
28163 Points -9%
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
28056 Points -9%
Realme GT 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
27232 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (271 - 30892, n=176, last 2 years)
11579 Points -63%
Wild Life Extreme
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
8263 Points
Realme GT 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
7765 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (6289 - 8329, n=13)
7420 Points -10%
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
7255 Points -12%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
7021 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (61 - 8263, n=177, last 2 years)
3067 Points -63%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
8271 Points
Realme GT 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
7731 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (6168 - 8271, n=12)
7324 Points -11%
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
7321 Points -11%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
6959 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 8271, n=176, last 2 years)
3043 Points -63%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Realme GT 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
120 fps 0%
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
120 fps 0%
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
120 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (60 - 120, n=13)
105.2 fps -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.2 - 166, n=188, last 2 years)
59.5 fps -50%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
378 fps
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
334 fps -12%
Realme GT 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
311 fps -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (203 - 378, n=14)
304 fps -20%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
296 fps -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 378, n=188, last 2 years)
123 fps -67%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Realme GT 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
120 fps +7%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
120 fps +7%
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
112 fps
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
105 fps -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (60 - 120, n=13)
102.8 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 144, n=189, last 2 years)
47.8 fps -57%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
141 fps
Realme GT 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
136 fps -4%
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
129 fps -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (65 - 145, n=14)
118.1 fps -16%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
114 fps -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 151, n=188, last 2 years)
47.1 fps -67%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
62 fps
Realme GT 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
56 fps -10%
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
56 fps -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (35 - 62, n=13)
51.6 fps -17%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
50 fps -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.54 - 62, n=190, last 2 years)
21.8 fps -65%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.7
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5210, n=89, last 2 years)
719 Points +6%
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
678 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (511 - 843, n=12)
647 Points -5%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
559 Points -18%
Realme GT 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
543 Points -20%
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
511 Points -25%
Half Precision NPU 1.7
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 36297, n=89, last 2 years)
2922 Points +337%
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
669 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (486 - 843, n=12)
626 Points -6%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
561 Points -16%
Realme GT 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
535 Points -20%
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
505 Points -25%
Quantized NPU 1.7
Average of class Smartphone
  (133 - 49889, n=89, last 2 years)
4302 Points +187%
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
1499 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (974 - 1986, n=12)
1398 Points -7%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
1285 Points -14%
Realme GT 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
1243 Points -17%
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
1132 Points -24%
CrossMark
Overall
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
2598 Points 0%
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
2593 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (1698 - 2856, n=9)
2402 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (376 - 2856, n=103, last 2 years)
1172 Points -55%
Productivity
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
2260 Points +3%
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
2198 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (1380 - 2366, n=9)
2002 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (388 - 2366, n=103, last 2 years)
1077 Points -51%
Creativity
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
2008 Points
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
1829 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (1357 - 2123, n=9)
1805 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (310 - 2123, n=103, last 2 years)
975 Points -51%
Responsiveness
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
11299 Points +37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (6210 - 12907, n=9)
9912 Points +20%
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
8273 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (466 - 13042, n=103, last 2 years)
3363 Points -59%
Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total Score
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
297.236 Points 0%
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
296.323 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (2 - 480, n=9)
273 Points -8%
Realme GT 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
259.543 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2 - 480, n=72, last 2 years)
220 Points -26%
Vivo iQOO 15 UltraRealme GT 8 ProXiaomi Poco F8 UltraVivo iQOO 15Average 1 TB UFS 4.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
28%
27%
-1%
0%
-33%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)
2789.45
4087.51
47%
4064.33
46%
2556.87
-8%
2789 ?(n=1)
0%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)
2983.12
3324.21
11%
3987.65
34%
2589.26
-13%
2983 ?(n=1)
0%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)
384.93
488.38
27%
575.86
50%
453.54
18%
385 ?(n=1)
0%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)
695.47
871.05
25%
551.82
-21%
689.01
-1%
695 ?(n=1)
0%
Max. Load
 47.1 °C46.8 °C44.2 °C 
 48.5 °C47.3 °C44.7 °C 
 48.4 °C47 °C44.7 °C 
Maximum: 48.5 °C
Average: 46.5 °C
45.7 °C45.9 °C48.8 °C
46.4 °C48.8 °C43.7 °C
45.1 °C47.5 °C52 °C
Maximum: 52 °C
Average: 47.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  43.2 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 46.5 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.5 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash
66.8 %
Vivo iQOO 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
65.9 % -1%
Realme GT 8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
39.5 % -41%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Vivo iQOO 15
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
65.8 %
Realme GT 8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
32.9 %
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170Tooltip
Vivo iQOO 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø28 (26-39.5)
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø131.4 (115.3-172.5)
Vivo iQOO 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø103.7 (93.6-142)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2014.742.52517.842.23119.539.64021.1415021.343.56323.641.7802142.310017.14812526.658.81602463.520019.665.325023.36831532.87140026.665.350024.666.763035.475.180033.173.3100036.775.9125038.681.1160034.881.7200036.782.6250034.478.4315029.975.6400030.976.150003071.4630025.577.8800024.483.31000027.183.41250027.876.71600022.571SPL45.691.2N4.990.7median 27.8median 75.6Delta57.17.626.31428.820.519.823.227.423.728.422.822.517.520.321.127.521.237.712.647.714.55418.65514.458.414.754.51360.111.87010.767.710.969.58.772.98.875.313.377.45.673.9-0.669.94.169.23.6661.470.7272.13.166.3459.14.950.221.484.10.356.7median 10.8median 66.35.18hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseVivo iQOO 15 UltraVivo iQOO 15
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Vivo iQOO 15 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 146)
28h 13min
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
7400 mAh
Realme GT 8 Pro
7000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
6500 mAh
Vivo iQOO 15
7000 mAh
Battery runtime
WiFi v1.3 (h)
28.2
23.4
-17%
21.9
-22%
23.7
-16%

Notebookcheck 总体评分

即使没有风扇,vivo 的 Ultra 手机也是一款拥有众多优势的智能手机,即使配备了 24GB 内存和 1TB 存储空间,价格仍然不贵,不过它只能以进口方式销售。

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra - 03/30/2026 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
91%
Keyboard
80 / 75 → 100%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
62 / 69 → 90%
Weight
88%
Battery
95%
Display
93%
Games Performance
49 / 55 → 89%
Application Performance
95 / 85 → 100%
AI Performance
44%
Temperature
81%
Noise
100%
Audio
82 / 90 → 91%
Camera
85%
Average
72%
90%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
30%
Packaging
85%
Power Use
96%
Repairability
31%
Software Updates
80%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 53.7%

可能的替代品一览

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
89.6%
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 1024 GB 
List Price: 800€227 g1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash6.85"
3168x1440
508 PPI
OLED
2.
84.1%
Realme GT 8 Pro
Realme GT 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
List Price: 1000€214 g256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.79"
3136x1440
508 PPI
AMOLED
3.
88.2%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon: List Price: 900€220 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.90"
2608x1200
416 PPI
AMOLED
4.
88.6%
Vivo iQOO 15
Vivo iQOO 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $13.80
Kukoufey Compatible with iQO...
2. $10.17
NEOYUKL Privacy Screen Prote...
3. $13.80
Kukoufey Compatible with Viv...
List Price: 580€
215 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.85"
3168x1440
508 PPI
AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 智能手机不需要的独特功能:vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 评测
Marcus Herbrich, 2026-04- 6 (Update: 2026-04- 6)