对 vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 的评价
iQOO 15 Ultra 为智能手机提出了一个基本问题:手机真的需要像笔记本电脑那样的集成风扇吗?结果并非如此。至少就目前而言,我们看不到 vivo 的做法有任何真正的附加值。即使在 Ultra 机型中,风扇本应控制的骁龙 8 Elite Gen 5 仍然会出现明显的跳动。目前也缺乏有意义的使用场景。
不过,我们的评测也揭示了这一突出功能之外的许多亮点。XXL 电池能让游戏手机长时间运行,而且可以快速充电。扬声器系统非常出色,而高级机身、超声波指纹传感器和一流的振动马达则使其外观和手感极具说服力。
对于一款游戏手机来说,摄像头,或者说制造商的摄像头算法,出乎意料地好。在照片质量方面,iQOO 15 Ultra 让 iPhone 17 看起来像一款廉价的中端手机。
Pros
Cons
vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 的价格和上市时间
iQOO 15 Ultra 目前只在中国上市。基本机型的起价为 5699 元人民币,约合 700 欧元。vivo 尚未公布任何有关可能在国际市场推出的细节。作为进口产品,目前深圳交易市场的起价为,约合 800 欧元。.
vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 的规格
外壳和功能:Android 手机,带 LED 灯带

Ultra 机型的设计与 iQOO 15 非常相似,但作为旗舰手机的 15 系列现在后部采用了醒目的蜂窝状图案,有白色和黑色可供选择。方形摄像头模块还配有彩色 LED 灯带,可以发出接收通知的信号。尽管如此,我们还是喜欢 LED环要好得多。
这种取舍是因为 iQOO 15 Ultra 配备了集成风扇。这款游戏手机的主动散热也对其重量产生了负面影响,因为机身相当重,达到 227 克。
但在防水方面却没有任何影响。尽管有风扇,这款 vivo 手机还是通过了 IP69 防水认证。Ultra 机型在制造质量方面也完全令人信服。
除了自制的 Q3 游戏芯片外,iQOO 15 Ultra 还采用了 LPDDR5X Ultra Pro,它比标准的 LPDDR5X 内存具有更高的数据传输速率。两个触摸式肩部按键可用作游戏控制,这也体现了它对游戏的关注。
此外,还配备了 NFC 芯片、USB OTG、红外端口和快速 USB Type-C 3.2 端口。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
尺寸比较
连接和功能:配备 Wi-Fi 7 和超声波指纹传感器的 vivo 手机
iQOO 15 Ultra 提供蓝牙 5.4 和 Wi-Fi 7,不过在我们的中国评测机上,对快速 6 GHz 频段的访问受到限制。在我们测试的每个路由器上,vivo 手机都无法连接到 6 GHz 频道,数据吞吐量相对较低。
除了支持双卡双待外,vivo 手机还覆盖了重要的 LTE 频段,如 Band 20 和 28,以及广泛的 5G 频段。
对于一款游戏手机来说,出色的超声波指纹传感器和超强的振动马达都是不言而喻的。
| Networking | |
| Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Realme GT 8 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Vivo iQOO 15 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
软件和可持续性:配备Android 16 的游戏智能手机
尽管是中文版,但 iQOO 15 Ultra 支持包括英语在内的多种界面语言。OriginOS 6 基于Android 16,可以顺利使用 Google Play Store 和Android Auto。不过,这两个应用程序都不是开箱即用的,必须由用户安装或激活。中文应用程序可以卸载,但某些软件限制,如不支持 eSIM、Wear OS 手表兼容性和中国特有的人工智能功能,则无法解决。
有人提出了五年的更新期限,但我们无法核实任何官方细节。
在透明度方面也有改进的余地,因为没有关于所使用的可回收材料比例的具体细节。不过,包装似乎不含塑料。
摄像头:配备 OIS 和长焦镜头的游戏旗舰手机
iQOO 15 Ultra 在摄像头硬件方面的取舍比其他游戏旗舰少,例如 RedMagic 11 Pro.除了 5000 万像素超广角摄像头外,vivo 还为其配备了一枚极具吸引力的 5000 万像素长焦镜头,具有 3 倍光学变焦和 OIS 功能。
5000 万像素的主摄像头采用 1/1.56 英寸传感器,支持光学防抖,可拍摄出锐利、高对比度的照片。对于一款主打游戏的智能手机来说,其非常好的动态范围也是理所当然的。让我们来看看 iQOO 15 Ultra 的弱光照片与 iPhone 17 的对比吧 iPhone 17可以看出 vivo 的相机软件已经变得多么出色。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
HauptkameraHauptkameraLow LightUltraweitwinkel

显示屏:Android ,配备 OLED 大屏幕手机
6.85 英寸 LTPO AMOLED 面板的工作频率为 144 Hz,由于分辨率高达 1440p,像素密度超过 500 ppi。根据制造商的说法,该显示屏的峰值亮度可达 2,600 尼特,尽管在我们的 APL18 测量中略有不足。vivo 还宣称 HDR 亮度达到了令人印象深刻的 8000 尼特。
iQOO 15 Ultra 在高亮度级别使用直流调光,在低亮度级别使用 PWM 调光,频率为 2,160 Hz,以减少 OLED 闪烁的负面影响。不过,我们测得的基本频率仅为 120 Hz,这意味着不能排除脉宽调制引起的健康问题。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 1579 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 0.74 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.74}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.1 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.99}
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.252
CCT: 6556 K
| Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra OLED, 3168x1440, 6.9" | Realme GT 8 Pro AMOLED, 3136x1440, 6.8" | Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra AMOLED, 2608x1200, 6.9" | Vivo iQOO 15 AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.9" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -28% | -32% | -56% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1579 | 1896 20% | 1771 12% | 1137 -28% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1537 | 1891 23% | 1773 15% | 1113 -28% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 95 | 96 1% | 99 4% | 96 1% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.74 | 1.1 -49% | 1.3 -76% | 1.52 -105% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 1.8 | 3.1 -72% | 2.8 -56% | 3.05 -69% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 2.1 -91% | 2.1 -91% | 2.3 -109% |
| Gamma | 2.252 98% | 2.19 100% | 2.25 98% | 2.265 97% |
| CCT | 6556 99% | 6594 99% | 6452 101% | 6560 99% |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra | |
| Vivo iQOO 15 | |
| Realme GT 8 Pro | |
| Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra | |
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra | |
| Realme GT 8 Pro | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 120 Hz Amplitude: 16 % | ||
The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7920 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图)
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.3 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.2 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.3 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池寿命:vivo 手机采用高通公司的高端 SoC
iQOO 15 Ultra 配备了 骁龙 8 第五代精英处理器可在需要时通过 17 x 17 毫米风扇散热。这样做的目的是让旗舰 SoC 即使在持续负载的情况下也能充分发挥潜力。然而,在日常使用中,效果却不如预期。
在 3DMark 压力测试中,Ultra 型号的稳定性并没有明显优于其 兄弟机型在 3DMark 压力测试中,Ultra 机型的稳定性并没有明显优于其同类机型,尽管它能获得更高的性能。在负载情况下,我们测得的平均后部表面温度超过 47 °C,也明显高于 ROG Phone 9 Pro。 ROG Phone 9 Pro的 44.4 °C,尽管后者没有风扇。因此,vivo 智能手机的主动散热功能并不能改变游戏规则。
除此之外,iQOO 15 Ultra 的基准测试结果也很出色,在 GPU 测试中表现尤为突出。在某些情况下 Adreno 840甚至创造了新的最佳成绩。
这款游戏手机内置 7,400 毫安时的大容量电池,可通过 USB-C 接口以高达 100 瓦的功率充电,或以 40 瓦的功率无线充电。在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中,尽管 iQOO 15 Ultra 采用了 144 Hz 显示屏和 1440p 分辨率,但其续航时间仍超过了 28 小时。
| Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total Score | |
| Vivo iQOO 15 | |
| Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (2 - 480, n=9) | |
| Realme GT 8 Pro | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2 - 480, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra | Realme GT 8 Pro | Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra | Vivo iQOO 15 | Average 1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 28% | 27% | -1% | 0% | -33% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 2789.45 | 4087.51 47% | 4064.33 46% | 2556.87 -8% | 2789 ? 0% | 2162 ? -22% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 2983.12 | 3324.21 11% | 3987.65 34% | 2589.26 -13% | 2983 ? 0% | 1858 ? -38% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 384.93 | 488.38 27% | 575.86 50% | 453.54 18% | 385 ? 0% | 298 ? -23% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 695.47 | 871.05 25% | 551.82 -21% | 689.01 -1% | 695 ? 0% | 357 ? -49% |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.5 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra | |
| Vivo iQOO 15 | |
| Realme GT 8 Pro | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Vivo iQOO 15 | |
| Realme GT 8 Pro | |
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Vivo iQOO 15 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra 7400 mAh | Realme GT 8 Pro 7000 mAh | Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra 6500 mAh | Vivo iQOO 15 7000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 28.2 | 23.4 -17% | 21.9 -22% | 23.7 -16% |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- 03/30/2026 v8
Marcus Herbrich
可能的替代品一览
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB | List Price: 800€ | 227 g | 1 TB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.85" 3168x1440 508 PPI OLED | |
| Realme GT 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | List Price: 1000€ | 214 g | 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.79" 3136x1440 508 PPI AMOLED | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: List Price: 900€ | 220 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.90" 2608x1200 416 PPI AMOLED | |
| Vivo iQOO 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $13.80 Kukoufey Compatible with iQO... 2. $10.17 NEOYUKL Privacy Screen Prote... 3. $13.80 Kukoufey Compatible with Viv... List Price: 580€ | 215 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.85" 3168x1440 508 PPI AMOLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.





































