Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

傲视群雄 -Honor 400 Pro 智能手机评测

课间休息

Honor 400 Pro 以更实惠的价格提供了大量高端技术。400 Pro 的众多功能给人留下了深刻印象：明亮的显示屏、超大存储空间和快速充电。我们的评测揭示了 的偷工减料之处。Honor
Benedikt Winkel, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

结论 - 400 Pro 配置齐全

Honor 400 Pro 提供了丰富的功能。Pro 机型配备了我们在评测标准 400 时所忽略的功能：无线充电、更好的 IP 认证和 6 GHz 频段。

400 Pro 的各种摄像头、充足的存储空间和较高的系统性能给人留下了深刻印象。制造商还提供六年更新保证。电池续航时间与充电速度一样令人印象深刻。

与旗舰机相比有哪些不同？例如，它们的手感通常更加出色。400 Pro 性能也很强劲，但缺少最新的处理器。最后，相机系统仍有改进的余地。不过，400 Pro 还是物有所值的，尤其是考虑到它的售价。

Pros

+ 良好的系统性能
+ 运行时间长、充电快
+ 无线充电
+ 良好的摄像系统
+ 防护等级 IP69

Cons

- 负载时发热
- 耗电量大
- 按钮晃动
- 无 AOD

价格和供货情况 -Honor 的起步价较高

Honor 400 Pro 的零售价为 699 英镑。在测试时，在制造商的英国在线商店上使用优惠券可确保以 549 英镑的价格购买该设备，。.此外，还提供额外的免费礼品（价值 309 英镑）。其中包括免费耳机、100 瓦电源适配器和延长 180 天的一次性更换保修服务。

Honor 推出的编号系列是其旗舰产品之外的另一种选择。400 Pro 是 400 和 400 Lite 系列中的顶级机型。

400 Pro 仅在德国有售，配备 512 GB 存储空间和 12 GB 内存。它有两种颜色：月光灰和午夜黑。我们的评测机为黑色。

规格

Honor 400 Pro
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 8 x 2.3 - 3.3 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720 / A720 / A520 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 750
Memory
12 GB 
Display
6.70 inch 19.7:9, 2800 x 1280 pixel 460 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 481 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: gravity sensor, compass, ultrasonic proximity, OTG, IR blaster
Networking
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, GSM (mHz 900/ 1800/ 2100), LTE (Band 1/ 3/ 7/ 8/ 20/ 28/ 34/ 38/ 40), 5G (Band n1/ n3/ n7/ n8/ n20/ n28/ n38/ n40/ n41/ n77/ n78) , Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.1 x 160.8 x 76.1
Battery
0 Wh, 5300 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 200 MPix (f/1.9), OIS; 50 MPix Tele, (f/2.4), IMX856, OIS; 12 MPix Ultrawide, (f/2.2)
Secondary Camera: 50 MPix (f/2.0)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: onscreen, Keyboard Light: yes, SIM tool, USB cable, screen protection, MagicOS 9.0, 24 Months Warranty, IP68 + IP69; GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1), Beidou (B1); SAR-Head: 0,85 W/kg, SAR-Body: 1.27 W/kg, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API: Level 3; Bluetooth Codecs: SBC, AAC, LDAC, APTX, APTX HD , fanless, waterproof
Weight
205 g
Price
800 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳 - 400 Pro 防水防尘

Honor 400 Pro 的手感很好。正面和背面的边缘略呈圆形，按键位于机壳右侧。按键具有良好的受力点，但在评测设备上会晃动。

边框和背面为磨砂材质，不易沾染指纹。设备具有 IP69 防水防尘等级。在用力的情况下，智能手机可以轻微扭曲，从而产生噪音。缝隙非常小且均匀，但在测试期间，我们确实在 USB 端口上发现了第一道划痕。

尺寸比较

❌
161.2 mm 73 mm 8.2 mm 186 g160.8 mm 76.1 mm 8.1 mm 205 g160.26 mm 74.95 mm 8.39 mm 212 g158.4 mm 75.8 mm 7.3 mm 190 g152.8 mm 72 mm 8.5 mm 198 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

功能 - 专业型配备 USB 2.0

Honor 虽然 400 Pro 省去了可扩展存储空间，但 512 GB 的内部存储空间还是相当可观的。该设备支持双卡和 eSIM 卡。

遗憾的是，USB 端口仅兼容 USB 2.0，但该设备支持 exFAT 和 NTFS 文件系统。在搭配三星 PSSD T7 时，我们的传输速度达到了 37.6 MB/s。

软件 -Honor 承诺六年更新一次

Honor 400 Pro 配备 15 和 MagicOS 9.0 UI。这款智能手机将获得六年的安全更新和六个 版本。在 400 系列中，制造商主要依靠人工智能功能。它的软件可以将图像转换成视频，并充当视频和通话的翻译器。Android Android

可持续性

400 Pro 包装盒很小，不含塑料。制造商尚未提供有关该设备碳足迹的信息。大容量电池和长时间的软件支持表明该设备可以长期使用。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 400 Pro 具有 Wi-Fi 7 功能。

Honor 400 Pro 配备了 Wi-Fi 7，其中包括 6 GHz 频段。当与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 一起使用时，传输速度有所波动，但仍保持在较好的水平。

在我们的测试中，LTE 和 5G 接收效果也不突出。可以使用两张实体 SIM 卡或一张实体 SIM 卡和一张 eSIM 卡实现双卡双待。频段覆盖可以说是可以接受的。

Networking
Honor 400 Pro
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
958 (min: 874) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
810 (min: 771) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1238 (min: 936) MBit/s ∼67%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1483 (min: 1349) MBit/s ∼80%
Google Pixel 9
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
955 (min: 739) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
911 (min: 857) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1855 (min: 1826) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1851 (min: 886) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
987 (min: 506) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
863 (min: 749) MBit/s ∼74%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
990 (min: 879) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1574 (min: 1183) MBit/s ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1094 (min: 655) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1154 (min: 1048) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1311 (min: 984) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1204 (min: 1187) MBit/s ∼65%
Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
966 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1167 (min: 810) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1283 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1441 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼78%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
730 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼67%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
738 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼63%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1383 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1388 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼75%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700175018001850Tooltip
Honor 400 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1238 (936-1884)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1311 (984-1422)
Honor 400 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1481 (1349-1556)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1202 (1187-1213)
Honor 400 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø958 (874-1002)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1072 (655-1214)
Honor 400 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø808 (771-821)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1153 (1048-1191)
GNSS 室内连接
GNSS 室内连接
GNSS 室外连接
GNSS 室外连接

400 Pro 支持所有常见的卫星系统，但只支持单波段。不支持 SBAS。

在我们的测试过程中，事实证明智能手机能准确记录运动数据。

全球导航卫星系统测量：湖泊
全球导航卫星系统测量：湖泊
全球导航卫星系统测量：转折点
全球导航卫星系统测量：转折点
全球导航卫星系统测量：概要
全球导航卫星系统测量：概要

电话功能和语音质量 - 400 Pro 提供实时翻译功能

Honor 依靠的是其自带的简洁的电话应用程序。唯一的特殊功能是实时通话翻译，为此必须下载相应的插件。可以翻译中文、英文、德文、法文、西班牙文和意大利文。

语音质量不错，尤其是在激活人工智能降噪功能时。听筒和扬声器的声音会比较大。实时翻译很实用，但并不完美。根据要求，通话内容可以转录。

摄像头 -Honor 人工智能将图像转换成视频

与Honor 400 Pro 自拍
与Honor 400 Pro 自拍

Honor 400 Pro 采用三重设置。2 亿像素主摄像头由 5000 万像素变焦摄像头和 1200 万像素超广角摄像头提供支持。总体而言，相机性能令人印象深刻。不过，与高端智能手机相比，它在动态范围和清晰度方面有所欠缺。变焦和超广角摄像头拍摄的图像尚可使用。

软件可以根据要求锐化图像，人工智能可以进行色彩调整。总的来说，这款手机提供了很多软件功能，例如基于人工智能的图像增强功能，效果不错。主摄像头可拍摄最高 4K 和 60 fps 的视频。

5000 万像素的前置摄像头能拍出不错的自拍照。人像模式也令人印象深刻。前置摄像头最高可拍摄 4K 和 30 fps 的视频。视频质量很好，其中最突出的两点是防抖动和快速自动对焦。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

RabbitLakeUltra-wide-angle5x ZoomLow light
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
7.9 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
4 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
4 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor 400 Pro: 7.91 ∆E min: 2.45 - max: 12.14 ∆E
ColorChecker
19.1 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
25.6 ∆E
24 ∆E
29.5 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
19.7 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
34.5 ∆E
38.2 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
28.5 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
33.8 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
29.5 ∆E
37.1 ∆E
34.2 ∆E
32.7 ∆E
28 ∆E
21.2 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor 400 Pro: 26.65 ∆E min: 12.54 - max: 39.3 ∆E

配件和保修 - 400 Pro 预装了屏幕保护膜

400 Pro 包装包括设备、SIM 卡读卡器和 USB 数据线。显示屏已安装屏幕保护膜。充电器和耳机作为Honor 介绍性优惠的一部分免费提供。

400 Pro 在德国的保修期为 24 个月。

输入设备和操作 - 400 Pro 只有 2D 人脸识别功能

开箱后，Honor 使用其 "表情符号键盘"。在我们的测试中，输入非常流畅。即使在显示屏边缘也能可靠地识别输入内容。出厂时贴上的保护膜在边缘处很明显，很快就会起泡。滑动性能尚可，但没有保护膜会更好。

我们喜欢线性振动电机。反馈很清晰，而且运行起来相对安静。光学指纹识别器的快速、可靠解锁也给人留下了深刻印象。不过，它的位置可以再高一点。虽然 400 Pro 的正面有两个镜头，但智能手机只提供 2D 面部识别功能。在光线条件良好的情况下，识别速度很快。

显示屏 -Honor 可以达到 5000 尼特

子像素再现
子像素再现

Honor 400 Pro 采用 6.7 英寸 AMOLED 面板。根据 DRM 信息，它支持最高 120 Hz 的刷新率，以及 90 和 60 Hz 的刷新率。不过，在测试过程中，我们也发现在 60 Hz 的低频下屏幕会闪烁。Honor 在设置中提供了一种特殊的 3,840 Hz PWM 调光模式。

在 APL 测量中，我们测得的最大亮度为 1,518 cd/m²。我们还观察到Honor 所宣传的 5,000 尼特亮度，但仅限于 HDR 内容。我们的评测设备甚至达到了 5,199 cd/m²。在没有环境光传感器的情况下，我们测得的最高亮度为 642 尼特。

总的来说，该显示屏均匀的照明和鲜艳的色彩给我们留下了深刻的印象。

1540
cd/m²		1527
cd/m²		1527
cd/m²
1540
cd/m²		1535
cd/m²		1524
cd/m²
1540
cd/m²		1525
cd/m²		1523
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1540 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1531.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2.03 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 1535 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.83
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.29
Honor 400 Pro
AMOLED, 2800x1280, 6.7"		Google Pixel 9
OLED, 2424x1080, 6.3"		Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Flow AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"		Motorola Edge 60 Pro
P-OLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"		Samsung Galaxy S25+
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.7"
Screen
18%
-7%
-6%
-47%
Brightness middle
1535
2063
34%
1846
20%
1099
-28%
1371
-11%
Brightness
1531
1914
25%
1850
21%
1073
-30%
1370
-11%
Brightness Distribution
99
84
-15%
93
-6%
91
-8%
96
-3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.1
0.7
36%
1.2
-9%
1.25
-14%
2.7
-145%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.2
2.2
-0%
2.9
-32%
1.68
24%
4.2
-91%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.7
1.2
29%
2.3
-35%
1.4
18%
2
-18%
Gamma
2.29 96%
2.23 99%
2.25 98%
2.031 108%
2.03 108%
CCT
6511 100%
6524 100%
6707 97%
6403 102%
6450 101%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 60 Hz
Amplitude: 14.67 %
Secondary Frequency: 4166 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8356 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大显示亮度
100 %

以固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置进行的一系列测量（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看似平坦，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）。

面板的色彩平衡总体不错。红色饱和度有点过高，但在没有对比的情况下，日常使用中并不明显。

色彩精度（自然显示模式，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩精度（自然显示模式，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（显示模式自然，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（显示模式自然，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（显示模式自然，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（显示模式自然，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
饱和度（自然显示模式，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
饱和度（自然显示模式，目标色彩空间 sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.01 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.546 ms rise
↘ 0.4665 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.76 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.3605 ms rise
↘ 0.3995 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms).

400 Pro 的亮度储备足够大，可以在阳光直射下使用。视角稳定性也很好。内容色彩还原真实，即使从广角也能轻松看到。

性能 - 400 Pro 性能卓越

Honor 采用了高通公司去年的顶级 SOC，即 骁龙 8 代 3智能手机提供了高水平的性能。

在日常使用中，400 Pro 的快速系统性能给人留下了深刻印象。我们没有发现任何卡顿现象，在基准测试中，400 Pro 与竞争对手相比总体上处于中等水平。BaseMark OS II 和 AndroBench 无法安装。

Geekbench 6.4 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AI Benchmark
Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
3136 Points +54%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2959 Points +46%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2309 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (954 - 2329, n=26)
2113 Points +4%
Honor 400 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2031 Points
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1798 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3479, n=209, last 2 years)
1605 Points -21%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1457 Points -28%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
10029 Points +66%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
8711 Points +44%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
8154 Points +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (4564 - 7501, n=26)
6596 Points +9%
Honor 400 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6042 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=209, last 2 years)
4617 Points -24%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4616 Points -24%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
4501 Points -26%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2674793 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2271821 Points +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1390723 - 2162423, n=22)
1920710 Points +4%
Honor 400 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1847085 Points
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1409057 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=146, last 2 years)
1340846 Points -27%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1022007 Points -45%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
20673 Points +19%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
19622 Points +13%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
19261 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (12156 - 25683, n=25)
17965 Points +3%
Honor 400 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
17359 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=196, last 2 years)
14268 Points -18%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
13948 Points -20%
CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2441 Points +157%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2309 Points +143%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (951 - 1474, n=18)
1236 Points +30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2674, n=153, last 2 years)
1030 Points +8%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
951 Points 0%
Honor 400 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
951 Points
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
63113 Points +393%
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
35227 Points +175%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
23141 Points +81%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
22543 Points +76%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=149, last 2 years)
18527 Points +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (11487 - 18370, n=20)
16229 Points +27%
Honor 400 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
12806 Points
AI Benchmark - Score V6
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
12578 Points +51%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
10534 Points +27%
Honor 400 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
8316 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (5170 - 9552, n=5)
7271 Points -13%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4443 Points -47%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68.9 - 12578, n=54, last 2 years)
4386 Points -47%

Honor 400 Pro 的图形处理性能不错，制造商选用了 Adreno 750作为图形芯片。

在基准测试中，Honor 400 Pro 在对比设备中处于中间位置。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6885 Points +51%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
6036 Points +33%
Honor 400 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4552 Points
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3060 Points -33%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2601 Points -43%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7029 Points +53%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
5907 Points +29%
Honor 400 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4593 Points
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3110 Points -32%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2567 Points -44%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
26616 Points +57%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
22957 Points +35%
Honor 400 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
16971 Points
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10786 Points -36%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8998 Points -47%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12400 Points +66%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
11251 Points +51%
Honor 400 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7461 Points
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5058 Points -32%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12747 Points +72%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
11553 Points +56%
Honor 400 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7395 Points
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4946 Points -33%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2525 Points +73%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2295 Points +57%
Honor 400 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1462 Points
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1218 Points -17%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1023 Points -30%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2698 Points +83%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2343 Points +59%
Honor 400 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1473 Points
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1222 Points -17%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1083 Points -26%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Honor 400 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps -1%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps -1%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps -1%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
702 fps +90%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
697 fps +89%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
460 fps +25%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
419 fps +14%
Honor 400 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
369 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Honor 400 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps -1%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps -1%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps -1%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
450 fps +147%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
364 fps +100%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
257 fps +41%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
226 fps +24%
Honor 400 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
182 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Honor 400 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
117 fps -2%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
284 fps +70%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
283 fps +69%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
181 fps +8%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
167 fps 0%
Honor 400 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
167 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +26%
Honor 400 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
95 fps
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
94 fps -1%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
79 fps -17%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps -21%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
178 fps +59%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
164 fps +46%
Honor 400 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
112 fps
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
106 fps -5%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
80 fps -29%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +40%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
88 fps +2%
Honor 400 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
86 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66 fps -23%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65 fps -24%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
107 fps +34%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
94 fps +18%
Honor 400 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
80 fps
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps -34%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -50%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Honor 400 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps -1%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps -1%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
102 fps -16%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
100 fps -17%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
286 fps +51%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
248 fps +31%
Honor 400 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
189 fps
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
141 fps -25%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
108 fps -43%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps +41%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
43 fps +16%
Honor 400 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
37 fps
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps -35%
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps -49%
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)
334.386 Points +211%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra (Chrome 134)
243.318 Points +126%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (64.1 - 241, n=24)
156.7 Points +46%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=162, last 2 years)
140.1 Points +30%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115)
111.429 Points +4%
Honor 400 Pro (chrome 137)
107.55 Points
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)
107.467 Points 0%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)
446 runs/min +184%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (69.6 - 311, n=19)
214 runs/min +36%
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)
185 runs/min +18%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 585, n=143, last 2 years)
176.5 runs/min +12%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115)
158 runs/min +1%
Honor 400 Pro (chrome 137)
157 runs/min
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)
239 Points +123%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra (Chrome 134)
163 Points +52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (69 - 212, n=20)
158.7 Points +48%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 273, n=156, last 2 years)
131.2 Points +23%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115)
115 Points +7%
Honor 400 Pro (chrome 137)
107 Points
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)
103 Points -4%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)
98817 Points +152%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra (Chrome 134)
94853 Points +142%
Google Pixel 9
56737 Points +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (25953 - 72665, n=24)
52142 Points +33%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=208, last 2 years)
44402 Points +13%
Honor 400 Pro (chrome 137)
39175 Points
Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115)
38258 Points -2%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=165, last 2 years)
1322 ms * -6%
Honor 400 Pro (chrome 137)
1252 ms *
Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115)
1087.5 ms * +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (510 - 2066, n=22)
833 ms * +33%
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)
744.57 ms * +41%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)
388.7 ms * +69%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra (Chrome 134)
382.9 ms * +69%

* ... smaller is better

排放 -Honor 400 Pro 在压力测试中节流

温度 - 400 Pro 会发热

骁龙 8 代 3 以发热量高著称，400 Pro 在这方面也很吃力。在 "Burnout "基准测试的最大负载下，我们测得设备正面和背面的最高温度分别为 48.1 摄氏度和 44.1 摄氏度。

不过，在日常使用中，这款智能手机的温度依然很低。即使在观看视频和玩游戏时，Honor 也会明显发热，但并不烫手。压力测试突出显示了明显的节流现象。

Max. Load
 47.2 °C47.7 °C45.6 °C 
 46.9 °C48.1 °C44.8 °C 
 47.2 °C47.2 °C42.1 °C 
Maximum: 48.1 °C
Average: 46.3 °C
42.1 °C43.5 °C43.8 °C
41.4 °C44 °C44.1 °C
40.9 °C42.7 °C43.3 °C
Maximum: 44.1 °C
Average: 42.9 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 46.3 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.1 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68.5 % +60%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
64.6 % +51%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53.4 % +25%
Honor 400 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
42.7 %
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
42.2 % -1%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Honor 400 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
73.8 %
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71.3 % -3%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
70.1 % -5%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51.3 % -30%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
42.1 % -43%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Honor 400 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
75.8 %
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
74.5 % -2%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58.9 % -22%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
41.3 % -46%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78.5 % +6%
Honor 400 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
74 %
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
70.8 % -4%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66.5 % -10%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
41.6 % -44%
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Honor 400 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø24.1 (20.3-27.4)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø27.8 (25.4-36.2)
Honor 400 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø50.4 (38.6-90.4)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø99.3 (82.3-127.5)
Honor 400 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø19.1 (10.3-25.5)
Honor 400 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø22.3 (19.1-25.2)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø28.1 (24.9-33.4)
Honor 400 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø9.7 (8.23-11.1)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø13.8 (12.2-17.3)

扬声器 -Honor 400 Pro 音量很大

Honor 400 Pro 配备了立体声扬声器。总的来说，这款智能手机的音量非常大，但振动很小。高音线性悦耳，但即使对于智能手机来说，低音也有所欠缺。

在测试过程中，我们可以顺利连接蓝牙耳机。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.838.62530.1373126.736.94027.832.45035.937.96328.332.68028.833.410027.338.912517.244.816016.354.820014.759.525012.85631513.25740012.659.850012.368.763012.268.180012.168100012.374.3125012.378.2160012.176.220001278.2250012.281.831501382400013.183.7500013.182.6630013.576.1800013.472.31000013.468.81250013.564.31600013.361.4SPL2591.1N0.681.5median 13.1median 68.8Delta1.79.238.437.830.633.919.23521.534.336.939.124.43319.739.715.840.914.144.615.255.612.455.29.560.19.762.310.563.49669.869.38.974.49.477.211.580.911.278.11281.611.780.71279.61282.112.580.312.977.313.371.413.567.713.568.413.664.123.990.90.584median 12median 71.41.59.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHonor 400 ProSamsung Galaxy S25+
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Honor 400 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S25+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 -Honor 装有大容量电池

耗电量 - 400 Pro 非常耗电

Honor 400 Pro 配备了功耗极高的 骁龙8代3.其更新的 骁龙8精英版的 Poco F7 Ultra更经济实惠。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.19 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.09 / 2.06 / 2.09 Watt
Load midlight 9.72 / 11.48 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Honor 400 Pro
5300 mAh		Google Pixel 9
4700 mAh		Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
5300 mAh		Motorola Edge 60 Pro
6000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S25+
4900 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
12%
26%
-9%
12%
17%
21%
Idle Minimum *
1.09
0.66
39%
0.89
18%
1.3
-19%
0.45
59%
0.929 ?(0.4 - 1.5, n=20)
15%
0.87 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=161, last 2 years)
20%
Idle Average *
2.06
1.49
28%
1.19
42%
1.9
8%
1.09
47%
1.374 ?(0.81 - 2.11, n=20)
33%
1.425 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=161, last 2 years)
31%
Idle Maximum *
2.09
1.78
15%
1.22
42%
2.4
-15%
1.13
46%
1.54 ?(0.85 - 2.6, n=20)
26%
1.581 ?(0.85 - 4.46, n=161, last 2 years)
24%
Load Average *
9.72
7.44
23%
8.76
10%
8.6
12%
14.41
-48%
8.82 ?(3.34 - 14.7, n=19)
9%
7.16 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=148, last 2 years)
26%
Load Maximum *
11.48
16.64
-45%
9.3
19%
14.9
-30%
16.37
-43%
11.5 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=19)
-0%
10.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=148, last 2 years)
6%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Honor 400 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.49 (1.064-11.6)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.19 (0.617-16.3)
Honor 400 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.346 (1.283-1.491)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.664 (0.631-0.897)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Honor 400 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.9 (10-11.3)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø14.4 (9.58-16.3)
Honor 400 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.346 (1.283-1.491)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.664 (0.631-0.897)

电池寿命 - 400 Pro 的显示时间长达 20 小时

欧盟版本的 400 Pro 使用 5,300 mAh 电池。在我们进行的实际 Wi-Fi 网上冲浪测试中，400 Pro 的续航时间超过了 20 小时。在日常使用中，不充电也能使用两天。

如果有合适的电源适配器，充电功率可达 100 瓦。我们在测试中没有使用原装电源适配器，而是使用了Anker 335 电源适配器。这可以让智能手机在 15 分钟内从 0 充到 41%。充满电需要 50 分钟。

无线充电的最大功率为 50 瓦。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
20h 33min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Honor 400 Pro
5300 mAh
1233 min
Google Pixel 9
4700 mAh
990 min
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
5300 mAh
1103 min
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
6000 mAh
1343 min
Samsung Galaxy S25+
4900 mAh
1189 min

Notebookcheck 总体评价 - 400 Pro 是一款全面的软件包

对于那些不需要高端智能手机的最后一点性能和声誉的人来说，Honor 400 Pro 是一个有趣的选择。相机、显示屏和性能都给我们留下了深刻的印象。大容量电池弥补了稍高的功耗，400 Pro 的电池续航能力很强。

Honor 此外，400 Pro 还提供较长的更新时间、充足的存储空间以及 eSIM 支持和无线充电等功能。

Honor 400 Pro - 06/30/2025 v8
Benedikt Winkel

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
50 / 69 → 73%
Weight
88%
Battery
92%
Display
93%
Games Performance
31 / 55 → 56%
Application Performance
69 / 85 → 81%
AI Performance
83%
Temperature
83%
Noise
100%
Audio
73 / 90 → 82%
Camera
80%
Average
69%
83%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
95%
Power Use
97.5%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
100%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 59.6%

可能的替代品比较

Benchmark Comparison Plugin: ERROR, Layout "57" not supported!

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 傲视群雄 -Honor 400 Pro 智能手机评测
Benedikt Winkel, 2025-07- 2 (Update: 2025-07- 2)