判决
凭借 Pura 80 Pro，华为成功打造了一款全面的智能手机，但考虑到现有的不足，这款高阶机型更适合发烧友，难以推荐。许多问题是由与美国的贸易限制造成的，比如缺乏现代 5G 标准、谷歌服务和有竞争力的芯片组。不过，其他一些抱怨则是土生土长的，比如除了出色的主摄像头外，电池续航能力差、照片质量急剧下降等。
对于零售价超过 1,000 欧元的智能手机来说，市场上有很多更好的替代品，可以直接使用 Play Store 或Android Auto，而无需绕任何弯路。
Pros
Cons
华为 Pura 80 Pro 的价格和上市时间
华为 Pura 80 Pro 的规格
手机壳和功能 - 防水Android- 手机
Pura 80 Pro 通过了 IP69 认证，因此可以防水防尘。华为手机的做工和玻璃外壳的观感都没有问题，但拿在手上感觉相当厚重。采用第二代 Crystal Armour Kunlun 玻璃。
Pura 80 Pro 的屏占比约为 89%，外观时尚，但其 竞争对手显示屏边缘更薄。
其功能包括红外传感器、双频 GNSS 和 NFC，以及可选择图像输出和 OTG 的快速 USB 3.1 端口。
通信和操作 - 无 5G 功能的高级智能手机
在没有接入 5G 网络和蓝牙 5.2 的情况下，华为手机看起来就像从沉睡中醒来，进入了 2025 年。这种不足当然是由于贸易限制造成的，但它并没有改善用户体验。由于没有强大的 6 GHz 频段，我们在使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器时，只能获得相对较弱的 WiFi 7 标准接收性能。
中国的卫星 SOS 系统在全球版本中没有配备。我们的测试设备支持双卡（实体卡和 eSIM 卡），但根据数据表，也有单卡型号。主扬声器和听筒的声音听起来很自然。
指纹传感器集成在开关机按钮的一侧，这可能会让许多高端手机用户感到不悦。在日常使用中，它的效果令人非常满意。采样率为 300 Hz 的 6.8 英寸大屏幕也非常易于使用。线性振动电机可提供清晰的反馈。
| Networking | |
| Huawei Pura 80 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Vivo X300 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Oppo Find X9 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
软件和可持续性 -Android 手机无更新信息
Pura 80 Pro 并非基于 HarmonyOS，而是基于 EMUI 15，后者是基于Android 12 的开源部分。没有预装谷歌服务和 Play Store，用户最初只能依赖 AppGallery。不过，也可以使用极光商店，包括 Google Play 商店库。安装非常简单，请参阅本 另一篇文章.
华为并未正式公布软件更新的推出时间。不过，该制造商过去曾向我们确认，设备在产品周期结束后的 5 年内都能保证收到更新，即符合欧盟的要求。
可持续发展在 Pura 80 Pro 中并不占主要地位；至少，我们不知道有关所用材料的任何官方信息。华为手机在 EPREL 数据库中的维修等级为 C。
摄像头 - 配备 1 英寸传感器的智能手机
在主摄像头方面，Pura 80 Pro 采用 1 英寸规格的 5000 万像素传感器，堪称顶级产品。配备光学防抖和 f/1.6 至 f/4.0 可变光圈的镜头无论在白天还是夜晚都能提供出色的锐度和强大的动态效果。不过，作为一款旗舰手机，超广角和长焦镜头的质量明显下降，这一点也不得不提。
由于内置了光谱通道传感器，色彩准确度应该特别高，这在日常使用中大部分情况下都很好。不过，Pura 80 Pro 的照片偶尔会出现明显的偏红。
说到视频，雄心勃勃的用户会看到其极限。Pura 80 Pro 不支持 8K 或 60 FPS 以上的 UHD 录像。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow LightUltra wide-angleZoom 5x
显示屏 - 大型 LTPO OLED 屏幕
华为在其高端手机上安装了一块 6.8 英寸 LTPO 显示屏，分辨率为 1,276p ，最大帧频为 120 Hz。据说亮度为 3,000 尼特，不过我们使用 APL18 模式测得的亮度为 3,384 cd/m²，这与日常使用更为相关。在播放 HDR 视频时，我们甚至达到了 3864 cd/m²。
Pura 80 Pro 使用脉宽调制来控制屏幕亮度。根据制造商的说法，它可以实现 1440 Hz 的高频 PWM 调光，从而将闪烁相关的影响降至最低。我们使用 Rigol 软件测量到的频率与此非常相似。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1654 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.7 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.78}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.8 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
CCT: 6897 K
| Huawei Pura 80 Pro OLED , 2848x1276, 6.8" | Vivo X300 AMOLED, 2640x1216, 6.3" | Xiaomi 17 Pro Max AMOLED, 2608x1200, 6.9" | Oppo Find X9 AMOLED, 2760x1256, 6.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 10% | 8% | 17% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1654 | 1537 -7% | 1099 -34% | 1132 -32% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1630 | 1523 -7% | 1067 -35% | 1114 -32% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 97 | 96 -1% | 95 -2% | 97 0% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 1.4 18% | 1.05 38% | 0.82 52% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.9 | 2.6 33% | 2.38 39% | 1.95 50% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 2.1 25% | 1.7 39% | 1 64% |
| Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.28 96% | 2.232 99% | 2.244 98% |
| CCT | 6897 94% | 6754 96% | 6779 96% | 6546 99% |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Huawei Pura 80 Pro | |
| Vivo X300 | |
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Vivo X300 | |
| Huawei Pura 80 Pro | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 360 Hz Amplitude: 15.46 % Secondary Frequency: 1428 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 360 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 360 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8098 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.512 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.39 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.76 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.37 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.393 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.6 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池寿命 -Android 低热量开发手机
Pura 80 Pro 依靠自主研发的 海思麒麟 9020提供了良好的系统性能，但 CPU 单元不如旗舰竞争产品 旗舰竞争产品在基准测试中。
GPU 单元 马龙 920不支持光线追踪，在 3DMark 和 GFXBench 测试中也只有部分令人信服的表现。在 4K 分辨率的高阶测试中，Pura 80 Pro 仅达到 14 帧/秒。
在电池运行时间方面，整体情况依然如此。华为手机的 SoC 采用 7 纳米工艺制造，在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中仅达到了 12 小时。5,170 毫安时电池可通过 USB-C 接口快速充电，最高功率可达 100 瓦，充电时间仅为半个多小时。幸运的是，随机附带了配套的快速充电器。此外，还支持无线充电。
| Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total Score | |
| Vivo X300 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2 - 469, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (n=1) | |
| Huawei Pura 80 Pro | |
| BaseMark OS II - Overall | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
| Vivo X300 | |
| Oppo Find X9 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 16690, n=149, last 2 years) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (7087 - 8075, n=2) | |
| Huawei Pura 80 Pro | |
| Huawei Pura 80 Pro | Vivo X300 | Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | Oppo Find X9 | Average 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -43% | -12% | -51% | -29% | -53% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 4354.89 | 2056.87 -53% | 3971.4 -9% | 3232.3 -26% | 3689 ? -15% | 2228 ? -49% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 4051.34 | 1997.76 -51% | 3899.9 -4% | 1565.8 -61% | 3092 ? -24% | 1852 ? -54% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 511.78 | 332.61 -35% | 548.4 7% | 335.7 -34% | 385 ? -25% | 296 ? -42% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 987.21 | 654.09 -34% | 561.3 -43% | 172.6 -83% | 474 ? -52% | 339 ? -66% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.9 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Huawei Pura 80 Pro | |
| Oppo Find X9 | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
| Vivo X300 | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Huawei Pura 80 Pro | |
| Oppo Find X9 | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
| Vivo X300 | |
| Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
| Oppo Find X9 | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Huawei Pura 80 Pro | |
| Vivo X300 | |
| Oppo Find X9 | |
Huawei Pura 80 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3 | |
| Huawei Pura 80 Pro | |
| Vivo X300 | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
| Oppo Find X9 | |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
华为 80 Pro 的主摄像头非常出色，但只推荐给华为粉丝。
Huawei Pura 80 Pro
- 12/23/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich
Total Sustainability Score: 可比较的替代品
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 85.1%  | Huawei Pura 80 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 9020 ⎘ HiSilicon Maleoon 920 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $9.39 TNKISRY Tempered Glass for H... 2. $2.96 2pc Black Camera Lens Protec... 3. $10.39 TNKISRY Tempered Glass for H... List Price: 1098€ | 219 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.80" 2848x1276 459 PPI OLED |
2. 88%  | Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500 ⎘ Arm Mali G1- Ultra MC12 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $7.99 Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible ... 2. $6.91 MAOUICI Tempered Glass for V... 3. $6.91 MAOUICI Tempered Glass for V... List Price: 1049€ | 190 g | 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.31" 2640x1216 461 PPI AMOLED |
3. 89%  | Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB | Amazon: 1. $8.19 Anoowkoa 3 Pack Glass Screen... 2. $9.90 Anbzsign 2+1 Pack for Xiaomi... 3. $13.59 iPhone 17 Pro Max Charger Fa... List Price: 940€ | 219 g | 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.90" 2608x1200 416 PPI AMOLED |
4. 86.1%  | Oppo Find X9 MediaTek Dimensity 9500 ⎘ Arm Mali G1- Ultra MC12 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $7.99 Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible ... 2. $9.11 MAOUICI Tempered Glass for O... 3. $7.99 Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible ... List Price: 999€ | 203 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.59" 2760x1256 460 PPI AMOLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
