结论：纤薄的可折叠外形设计需要权衡利弊
vivo X Fold5 是一款令人印象深刻的超薄可折叠智能手机，配备了非常出色的蔡司相机系统和吸引人的 OLED 面板。
由于 X Fold5 并非去年 Pro 机型的后续机型，因此并不期待其采用当前的旗舰级 SoC。不过，其性能足以满足日常使用需求。
不过，极端发热和明显的节流现象则是比较棘手的问题。
鉴于电池容量较大，运行时间有些令人失望。当然，这里还有优化的潜力，这也适用于 vivo 在更新和可持续功能方面的沟通。
Pros
Cons
vivo X Fold5 的价格和上市时间
- $12.98Puccy 2 Pack Camera Lens Protector Film, compatible with vivo X Fold 5 TPU Camera Guard （ Not Tempered Glass/Not Front Screen Protectors ）
- $22.39xuenair Z Fold 4 Car Mount, [2 Forms & Thick Case Friendly] Gravity Cell Phone Holder Mount for Samasung Galaxy Fold 7 6 5 4 3 2 Accessories Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold S25 Ultra iPhone 16 15 14
vivo X Fold5 的规格
构造和功能：X Fold5 具有 IP 防水等级
vivo X Fold5 是一款采用超薄设计的高品质可折叠手机。展开时，这款智能手机（或者说迷你平板电脑）的厚度仅为 4.3 毫米，折叠时为 9.2 毫米。这使得它几乎不比 Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max.
在日常使用中，几乎看不出显示屏折叠褶皱，铰链无级调节，紧致舒适，使这款可折叠手机看起来优质耐用。
尽管采用了可折叠设计，这款智能手机的重量仅为 217 克，因此比许多传统智能手机都要轻。
X Fold5 的另一个亮点是通过了 IP5X 和 IPX8 认证，外壳可以防尘并完全防水。
在功能方面，X Fold5 提供现代蓝牙 5.4、Miracast、USB OTG 和 NFC。尤其值得一提的是 USB 3.2 Gen 1 端口，它不仅能实现快速数据传输，还支持 HDMI 或 DisplayPort 接口的有线显示输出。
通信和操作：内置 Wi-Fi 7，但没有 eSIM 卡
X Fold5 手机支持包括 6 GHz 频段在内的 Wi-Fi 7，理论上可以实现很高的数据传输速率。结合华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器，我们测得的接收吞吐量高达 1,800 Mb/s。不过，传输性能明显较慢。
在蜂窝网络方面，X Fold5 涵盖了目前所有的标准，在中国版本中已经提供了广泛的频率，包括对欧洲非常重要的 20 和 28 频段。这款智能手机支持双卡双待和双频 GPS，但在进口时必须取消 eSIM 功能。
X Fold5 通过集成在锁屏按钮侧面的指纹传感器解锁，该传感器工作快速可靠。
正如你对可折叠手机的期望一样，X Fold5 有两个 OLED 显示屏。外侧 6.53 英寸和 8.03 英寸主显示屏均采用 120 Hz 刷新率，操作起来感觉非常流畅，对输入的响应也非常迅速。没有笔输入。
| Networking | |
| Vivo X Fold 5 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Oppo Find N5 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Vivo X Fold3 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
软件和可持续性：基于 Origin OS 的Android 15
X Fold5 迄今只在中国和印度推出，运行 OriginOS 5（印度版本为 Funtouch OS 15），它基于Android 15，支持包括德语在内的多种语言。
vivo 没有透露打算在多长时间内为其可折叠手机提供 Origin OS 中国 ROM 的软件更新，但 Funtouch OS 计划将接受四次主要的Android OS 更新和五年的安全补丁。
如果 vivo 计划在欧洲发布 X Fold5 的全球版本，那么这款可折叠手机将符合新的欧盟指令，很可能会采用 Funtouch OS。
目前还没有关于可持续发展的信息。此外，也几乎无法确认用户是否可以自行维修该设备。
摄像头：5,000 万像素三摄像头设置，与蔡司合作
机身背面引人注目的圆形摄像头模块包含三个 5000 万像素镜头，并带有蔡司品牌标识。虽然采用 1/1.56 英寸传感器格式的主摄像头与旗舰智能手机（如 vivo X200 Ultra相比，它在日光下仍能拍摄出非常出色的照片。
但在弱光环境下，图像噪点和模糊现象会明显增加。专用的色温传感器应该可以确保更自然的色彩，但实际效果并不那么可靠。我们的色彩分析发现了一些异常值。
作为一款可折叠智能手机，vivo X Fold5 的超广角和潜望式摄像头达到了不错的水平。总体而言，我们测试照片的质量与 Apple iPhone 16 Pro.
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
HauptkameraHauptkameraLow LightUltraweitwinkel
显示屏：双 AMOLED 屏幕，具有快速响应时间和 240 Hz PWM 功能
X Fold5 的最大亮点是可折叠的 8.03 英寸 120 Hz LTPO AMOLED 面板，在我们的测试中达到了 3,672 cd/m² 的峰值亮度（APL18）。6.53 英寸的外接显示屏也采用了 LTPO 技术，刷新率高达 120 Hz，但与较大的主屏幕相比，457 PPI 的清晰度略高。
与 OLED 的典型做法一样，PWM 用于控制屏幕亮度，这可以通过屏幕闪烁观察到。根据 vivo 的说法，护眼功能是通过高 PWM 调光频率实现的。我们的显示测量结果约为 240 Hz。
内部显示屏照明
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1085 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 0.68 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.82}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.1 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.247
CCT: 6545 K
外部显示屏照明
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 855 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 0.62 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.82}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.218
CCT: 4794 K
| Vivo X Fold 5 AMOLED LTPO, 2480x2200, 8" | Oppo Find N5 AMOLED, 2480x2248, 8.1" | Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 AMOLED LPTO, 2488x2224, 8" | Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold OLED LTPO, 2152x2076, 8" | Vivo X Fold3 AMOLED, 2480x2200, 8" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -48% | -135% | -16% | 5% | |
| Brightness middle | 1085 | 1240 14% | 1111 2% | 1793 65% | 1793 65% |
| Brightness | 1065 | 1179 11% | 1120 5% | 1599 50% | 1806 70% |
| Brightness Distribution | 96 | 91 -5% | 99 3% | 66 -31% | 99 3% |
| Black Level * | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.68 | 1.36 -100% | 3.42 -403% | 0.9 -32% | 0.9 -32% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 1.6 | 3.06 -91% | 5.92 -270% | 3.1 -94% | 2.1 -31% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 2.4 -118% | 2.7 -145% | 1.7 -55% | 1.6 -45% |
| Gamma | 2.247 98% | 2.239 98% | 2.206 100% | 2.19 100% | 2.2 100% |
| CCT | 6545 99% | 6353 102% | 7081 92% | 6714 97% | 6595 99% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 239.7 Hz Amplitude: 17 % |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 239.7 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 239.7 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8291 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）
我们使用 Portrait Displays 公司的 Calman Ultimate 分析软件来检查出厂色彩校准的偏差程度。我们确定的各色彩和灰度的 DeltaE 2000 值非常低。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.9 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32 ms). | ||
封面显示：PWM 和响应时间
性能、排放和电池寿命X Fold5 显示出较高的热量排放
如果您想要一款功能强大的芯片组，X Fold 5 将让您物有所值。 OPPO Find N5配备了 骁龙 8 EliteSoC 在基准测试中的表现要好得多。
不过 骁龙 8 代 3相比，X Fold5 中的 骁龙 8 代 2芯片相比 X Fold3的前身相比，X Fold5 的骁龙 8 代 2 芯片有了长足的进步。
在 3D Mark Wild Life Stress 测试中，明显的温度变化导致系统严重节流。我们测得的峰值温度接近 60 °C，这显然过高了。
6,000 mAh 电池可通过 USB Type-C 接口以最高 80 W 的功率充电，以 40 W 的功率无线充电，这一点非常出色。不过，令人惊讶的是，这只能为我们提供 15 小时的电池续航时间。
| Geekbench AI | |
| Single Precision NPU 1.4 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (231 - 1131, n=19, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (422 - 499, n=2) | |
| Vivo X Fold 5 | |
| Half Precision NPU 1.4 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (231 - 4555, n=19, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (415 - 497, n=2) | |
| Vivo X Fold 5 | |
| Quantized NPU 1.4 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (133 - 4549, n=19, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (933 - 1133, n=2) | |
| Vivo X Fold 5 | |
| Vivo X Fold 5 | Oppo Find N5 | Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 | Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold | Vivo X Fold3 | Average 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -6% | 17% | -29% | 15% | 22% | -22% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 3879.64 | 3437.47 -11% | 3984.91 3% | 1827.6 -53% | 3556.73 -8% | 3973 ? 2% | 2200 ? -43% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 3545.98 | 3251.98 -8% | 3073.45 -13% | 1126.34 -68% | 3076.11 -13% | 3591 ? 1% | 1802 ? -49% |
| Random Read 4KB | 311.09 | 269.51 -13% | 369.73 19% | 263.31 -15% | 387.96 25% | 374 ? 20% | 296 ? -5% |
| Random Write 4KB | 309.42 | 339.32 10% | 485.32 57% | 376.94 22% | 486.21 57% | 506 ? 64% | 341 ? 10% |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 59.9 °C / 140 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.4 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(-) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 47.5 °C / 118 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMarkSteel Nomad 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold | |
| Vivo X Fold 5 | |
| Vivo X Fold3 | |
| Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 | |
| Oppo Find N5 | |
| Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
| Vivo X Fold 5 | |
| Vivo X Fold3 | |
| Oppo Find N5 | |
| Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 | |
Vivo X Fold 5 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Vivo X Fold3 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (1.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Vivo X Fold 5 6000 mAh | Oppo Find N5 5600 mAh | Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 5100 mAh | Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold 4650 mAh | Vivo X Fold3 5500 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 911 | 1306 43% | 968 6% | 879 -4% | 757 -17% |
Notebookcheck 对 vivo X Fold5 的总体印象
如果你想拥有一款配备蔡司摄像头的最新可折叠手机，如果你不在中国或印度，vivo X Fold5 仍然需要进口。不过，vivo X Fold5 支持包括德语在内的全球语言，而且可以方便地访问 Google Play 商店，这意味着限制很少。
Vivo X Fold 5
- 08/13/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich
Total Sustainability Score: 潜在替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 85.4%  | Vivo X Fold 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $12.68 Puccy 4 Pack Screen Protecto... 2. $12.98 Puccy 2 Pack Camera Lens Pro... 3. $22.39 xuenair Z Fold 4 Car Mount, ... List Price: 1300€ | 217 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 8.03" 2480x2200 413 PPI AMOLED LTPO |
2. 87%  | Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $9.96 Kepuch Screen Protector Comp... 2. $3.85 Transparent Glass Camera Len... 3. $12.68 Puccy 4 Pack Screen Protecto... List Price: 1577€ | 229 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 8.12" 2480x2248 412 PPI AMOLED |
3. 85.3%  | Xiaomi Mix Fold 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $25.99 JSAUX Cup Holder Universal M... 2. $25.59 xuenair Z Fold 7 6 5 4 3 2 C... 3. $9.99 MOOISVS [2Pack for Xiaomi Mi... List Price: 1250€ | 226 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 7.98" 2488x2224 418 PPI AMOLED LPTO |
4. 84.4%  | Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4 ⎘ ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $1,620.00 Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold - Un... 2. $16.63 Ferilinso 2 Pack Screen Prot... 3. $1,084.97 Google Pixel 9 Pro - Unlocke... List Price: 1899€ | 257 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 8.00" 2152x2076 374 PPI OLED LTPO |
5. 88.8% v7 (old)  | Vivo X Fold3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 740 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB | Amazon: 1. $9.18 KJYFOANI For Vivo X Fold3 Sc... 2. $12.21 KJYFOANI For Vivo X Fold3 Sc... 3. $12.62 AQGGIIXY for vivo X Fold3 Pr... List Price: 1200€ | 219 g | 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash | 8.03" 2480x2200 413 PPI AMOLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
