结论：Realme GT 7 物超所值
realme GT 7 是一款通过 IP69 认证的高品质智能手机，配备 7,000 mAh 超大电池，支持 eSIM 卡和多功能摄像头。
作为一款中高端智能手机，它的性能非常出色，相机设置也提供了多种选择。
realme 还为 GT 7 提供了许多人工智能功能，其中人工智能计划功能尤为突出。
在测试过程中，我们无法测量显示屏的宣传亮度，但面板的亮度还是很准确的。
遗憾的是，无线充电和 6 GHz Wi-Fi 等功能无法使用。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
- $11.99Ibywind 2 Pcs Screen Protector For Realme GT 7 Pro 5G 6.78",Flexible TPU Film,With 1Pc Camera Lens Protector,1Pc Back Film,Bubble Free[Easy to install]
- $7.99Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible for Realme GT 7 Pro Screen Protector Tempered Glass,Case Friendly High definition Anti Scratch 9H Hardness Compatible with Realme GT 7 Pro Screen Protector
realme GT 7 是以下机型的中高档版本 realme GT 7 Pro的继任者 realme GT 6.它在这一细分市场的定位旨在以特别出色的性价比给人留下深刻印象。
GT 7 有两个存储版本：12/256 GB 和 12/512 GB 两个版本，最初的零售价分别为 750 欧元和 800 欧元，但在发布时已经下调了 100 欧元。
此外，还有一款与阿斯顿-马丁 F1 车队合作推出的梦想版机型。
GT 7 梦想版的特点是内存更大、配件更特别、颜色更特别，售价为 900 欧元。
realme GT 7 的规格
构造和功能：Realme GT 7 通过 IP69 认证
realme GT 7 有冰感黑和冰感蓝两种颜色可供选择。边框由铝合金制成，正面由康宁大猩猩 7i 玻璃保护，石墨烯背面采用磨砂处理。
虽然背面和边框之间的缝隙并不总是完全平整，而且 GT 7 在扭动时会发出轻微的吱吱声，但做工还是不错的。
GT 7 的防尘防水性能符合 IP69 标准，甚至可以承受高压和蒸汽喷射清洗。
USB 端口仅为 2.0 规格，因此不支持 DisplayPort 输出。
红外线发射器可用于遥控空调系统、摄像头、娱乐设备等。
通讯和操作无 6 千兆赫无线局域网
结合华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器，realme GT 7 可提供快速的 Wi-Fi 吞吐量和稳定的传输速率。不过，尽管支持 Wi-Fi 7，但不支持 6 GHz 频段。
GT 7 在城市中的蜂窝网络接收效果很好，在郊区也没有问题。将智能手机贴在耳边时，语音质量不错，但环境噪声过滤效果一般。
除了两张 nano-SIM 卡外，GT 7 还可以使用 eSIM 卡代替第二张实体 SIM 卡。
在生物识别安全方面，显示屏上集成了光学指纹传感器，可以快速识别和解锁智能手机。
人脸识别功能也可通过前置摄像头实现，但在黑暗环境中很快就会达到极限，安全性较低。
雨水-水-泥沙-触摸功能非常实用，可有效防止因进水而在触摸屏上输入错误信息。
| Networking | |
| Realme GT 7 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Global Average -3 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
软件与可持续发展：Android 15 与大量人工智能
realme GT 7 在谷歌Android 15 的基础上搭载了 realme UI 6.0。据制造商称，GT 7 可以享受四年的重大更新和六年的安全补丁。
其中包含大量人工智能工具，可实现语音和文本总结、文本创建和游戏体验。此外，realme 还注重图像后期处理。
不过，真正的亮点是人工智能计划功能，它可以从文件、电子邮件或图片中筛选出约会，并直接输入到日历中。
不过，在可持续发展方面，realme 并不愿意发表任何具体声明。
外包装不使用塑料。没有为客户提供维修或备件说明。
摄像头多用途三摄像头，最高可拍摄 4K 120 fps 视频
前置摄像头具有 3200 万像素的高分辨率，但没有使用像素分档，这在弱光环境下拍照时尤为明显。在全尺寸下，细节看起来有点做作，但除此之外，realme GT 7 的自拍非常吸引人。视频可以录制成 4K 超高清 60 帧/秒。
背面的三摄像头包括两个 5000 万像素传感器，但变焦时没有光学防抖（OIS）。在高达 100 倍的数字变焦范围内，它仍能提供不错的效果。
主摄像头拍摄的图像对比度非常高，饱和度过高，尤其是在暗绿色调时。超广角镜头的分辨率仅为 800 万像素，但拍摄效果令人惊喜。
视频录制速度最高可达 8K 30 帧/秒，超高清视频甚至可以达到 120 帧/秒。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main CameraMain CameraUltra-wide angle5x ZoomLow light
显示屏：精确的 120 Hz OLED 显示屏，峰值亮度应为 6,000 cd/m²
realme GT 7 的 6.78 英寸 OLED 面板发光均匀，细节丰富，色彩显示准确。
制造商承诺亮度可达 6,000 cd/m²，但我们在测量中无法证实。在使用纯白色显示屏时，我们测量的平均亮度为 1,530 cd/m²。在减少白色区域（APL18）或 HDR 播放的情况下，亮度也不会提高。
我们通过开发者选项中的一个测量字段测量了峰值亮度，但即使在这里也只能达到 2,746 cd/m²。
OLED 的闪烁频率相对较低，仅为 90 Hz，但 realme 还采用了高频 PWM 调光技术，这应可减少对敏感用户的影响。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1519 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.83
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
98.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
| Realme GT 7 OLED, 2780x1264, 6.8" | Samsung Galaxy S25 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.2" | Honor 400 Pro AMOLED, 2800x1280, 6.7" | Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Flow AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -84% | -15% | -27% | |
| Brightness middle | 1519 | 1301 -14% | 1535 1% | 1846 22% |
| Brightness | 1530 | 1311 -14% | 1531 0% | 1850 21% |
| Brightness Distribution | 97 | 98 1% | 99 2% | 93 -4% |
| Black Level * | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1 | 3.1 -210% | 1.1 -10% | 1.2 -20% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 1.7 | 4.4 -159% | 2.2 -29% | 2.9 -71% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 2.3 -109% | 1.7 -55% | 2.3 -109% |
| Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.01 109% | 2.29 96% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 6661 98% | 6454 101% | 6511 100% | 6707 97% |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 | |
| Realme GT 7 | |
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 | |
| Realme GT 7 | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 90 Hz Amplitude: 16.76 % Secondary Frequency: 2083 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 90 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 90 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8350 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.578 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.647 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.96 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.5155 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.4465 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池寿命：SoC 速度快，运行时间长
realme GT 7 搭载 联发科 Dimensity 9400e.这颗 SoC 在所有方面都具有很高的性能，日常使用时系统速度非常快。
在 3DMark 压力测试中，机身表面温度急剧上升，有些地方甚至超过了 48 °C。虽然温度较高，但并不严重。在大多数压力测试中，SoC 保持稳定，但在要求较高的测试中略有节流。
GT 7 的两个扬声器提供了良好的音效体验，但在最大音量时，高音有时会有些失真。蓝牙编解码器支持不错，但不支持 LC3 或 Auracast。
这款智能手机配备 7,000 毫安时电池，是长时间运行的理想装备。这已经达到了很好的水平，但如果效率更高，运行时间肯定会更长。
GT 7 可以使用 120 瓦的电源适配器充电。遗憾的是，我们在测试时没有获得这种电源适配器。
| PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 27169, n=193, last 2 years) | |
| Realme GT 7 | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e (n=1) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra | |
| Realme GT 7 | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e (n=1) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=205, last 2 years) | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Geekbench AI | |
| Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Realme GT 7 | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e (n=1) | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (51 - 2472, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
| Realme GT 7 | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e (n=1) | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Average of class Smartphone (51 - 9453, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 | |
| Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
| Realme GT 7 | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e (n=1) | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Average of class Smartphone (123 - 13084, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 | |
| Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 | |
| Realme GT 7 | |
| Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400e (n=1) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=159, last 2 years) | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.3 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.3 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Realme GT 7 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Realme GT 7 | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra | |
| Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
| Realme GT 7 | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra | |
| Realme GT 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 | |
Realme GT 7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3 | |
| Realme GT 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra | |
Notebookcheck 对 realme GT 7 的总体印象
realme GT 7 的整体功能强大，拥有众多人工智能功能和超大电池容量，这在如此大小的智能手机中是意想不到的。
相机设置还算不错，但在测试中也显示出一些不足。不过，在这个价位上很难找到可与之媲美的产品。
Realme GT 7
- 06/27/2025 v8
Daniel Schmidt
Total Sustainability Score: Potential competitors in comparison
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 83.2%  | Realme GT 7 Mediatek Dimensity 9400e ⎘ ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $299.89 for Realme GT7 Pro GT 7 Pro ... 2. $11.99 Ibywind 2 Pcs Screen Protect... 3. $7.99 Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible ... | 206 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.78" 2780x1264 450 PPI OLED |
2. 88.9%  | Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. OtterBox Samsung Galaxy S25 ... 2. $7.98 firtstnow 3 Pack Glass Scree... 3. $18.99 Super Fast Charger Type C, 2... List Price: 899€ | 162 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.20" 2340x1080 416 PPI AMOLED |
3. 82.5%  | Honor 400 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $11.32 HGJTFANY [5 Pcs Screen Prote... 2. $7.87 FZZSZS (4-Pack for Honor 400... 3. $6.88 Damolong Screen Protector Co... List Price: 800€ | 205 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.70" 2800x1280 460 PPI AMOLED |
4. 85.3%  | Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $7.99 Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco F7 P... 2. $10.19 Ibywind For Xiaomi Poco F7 U... 3. $7.59 Anoowkoa 2 Pack for Xiaomi P... List Price: 800€ | 212 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.67" 3200x1440 526 PPI Flow AMOLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
