Notebookcheck Logo

小米13 Ultra评测--为徕卡爱好者提供的具有可变相机光圈的壮观的智能手机

终于不是USB2.0了。 凭借其旗舰智能手机,小米的目标是在今年的智能手机领域再次攀上相机的宝座。13 Ultra甚至使用了四个镜头,分辨率为50MP,焦距高达120毫米。在这里,请看看在我们的测试中,徕卡相机是否令人信服,问题又出在哪里。
5G Android Smartphone
小米13 Ultra智能手机评测

小米13 Ultra是中国制造商的高端智能手机系列的一个逻辑发展。除了高质量的徕卡Summicron镜头和其1英寸的索尼传感器,从专业机型,这个与徕卡合作开发的相机旗舰,能够在微距摄影领域带来一些改进--至少根据规格表。此外,小米13 Pro的弱点,如缓慢的USB 2.0数据传输标准,现在已经被Ultra模型所克服。

除此之外,小米的这两款高端智能手机在视觉上和技术上都非常相似。Ultra机型还提供了一个大而快的6.73英寸120-Hz QHD+ AMOLED显示屏和一个 高通Snapdragon 8 Gen 2.在价格方面,中国版的小米13 Ultra已经可以从国际进口商那里买到,起价约1000欧元(约1106美元)。然而,小米已经确认,这款旗舰智能手机也将在欧洲上市,但目前还没有关于价格或上市日期的细节。

Xiaomi 13 Ultra (13 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 8 x 2 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X3 / A715 / A710 / A510 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
Display
6.73 inch 20:9, 3200 x 1440 pixel 521 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 224 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, color spectrum, barometer, OTG, IR blaster, Miracast
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.3, 5G: n1 / n3 / n5 / n8 / n28a / n38 / n40 / n41 / n77 / n78 / n79; 4G: FDD-LTE B1 / B3 / B4 / B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B26, TDD-LTE B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42; 3G: B1/B4/ B5 / B6 / B8 / B19; 2G: B3 / B5 / B8, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.1 x 163.2 x 74.6
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/​1.9-f/​4.0, OIS, videos @4320p/​24fps) + 50 MP (f/​1.8, wide angle lens, macro lens) + 50 MP (f/​1.8, OIS, telephoto lens) + 50 MP, f/​3.0, OIS, periscope-telephoto lens); camera2 API Level 3
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.0, 22mm, 0.7µm)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, charger, USB cable, case, info material, MIUI 14, 12 Months Warranty, Widevine L1, GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B1C, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a), SBAS, fanless, waterproof
Weight
227 g, Power Supply: 103 g
Price
1000 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
89.7 %
06/2023
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740
227 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.73"3200x1440
88.8 %
09/2022
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
225 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.73"3200x1440
91.1 %
03/2023
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740
233 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"3080x1440
89.1 %
11/2022
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7
212 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3120x1440
89.4 %
05/2023
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740
199 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"2400x1080
绿色的小米13 Ultra
绿色的小米13 Ultra
黑色的小米13 Ultra
黑色的小米13 Ultra

小米13 Ultra可以买到三种不同的颜色版本和一个限量版,所有机型的背面都有共同的素食皮革纹理。这种材料手感舒适,根据制造商的说法,应该是耐磨和抗黄变的。它还应该有一个抗菌认证。就质量而言,这种皮革仿制品可能代表了欧洲前辈小米11 Ultra的所有者的退步。 小米11 Ultra它的陶瓷表面。但至少油腻的手指污点被纹理表面很好地隐藏起来。所有颜色变体的金属边框都是哑光的,并有相应的颜色。

由于有巨大的相机元件,这款高端智能手机的重量分布就像前代产品一样相当头重脚轻,特别是在相机镜头的区域,外壳也稍厚。这款中国制造商的旗舰机重量为227克(约8盎司),也不轻。小米13Ultra的做工质量非常好,缝隙平齐、均匀。此外,外壳通过了IP68认证,因此是防水的。

前面的AMOLED显示屏由第一代康宁大猩猩Victus保护。显示屏的边框很小,导致屏占比达到89.5%。

小米13 Ultra智能手机评测
小米13 Ultra智能手机评测
小米13 Ultra智能手机评测
小米13 Ultra智能手机评测
小米13 Ultra智能手机评测
小米13 Ultra智能手机评测
小米13 Ultra智能手机评测

尺寸比较

163.4 mm 78.1 mm 8.9 mm 233 g163.2 mm 74.6 mm 9.1 mm 227 g163.2 mm 75 mm 9.1 mm 225 g162.9 mm 76.6 mm 8.9 mm 212 g161.2 mm 74.8 mm 8.6 mm 199 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备 - 小米智能手机,存储量高达1TB

小米智能手机的USB-2.0时代随着13 Ultra的出现而结束,这家中国制造商的旗舰机现在提供快速的USB 3.2(Gen. 1)标准,除了有线图像输出到HDMI或DisplayPort连接外,还支持USB-OTG。在我们使用连接的M2.SSD驱动器(三星980 Pro)进行的拷贝测试中,USB端口达到了461 MB/s的相当高的传输速率--理论上,传输照片和视频的数据速率高达5 Gbit/s。小米的高端智能手机在中国有三个不同的版本:

小米13 Ultra| 12 GB LPDDR5x-RAM| 256 GB UFS 4.0存储空间

小米13 Ultra| 16 GB LPDDR5x-RAM| 512 GB UFS 4.0存储空间

小米13 Ultra| 16 GB LPDDR5x-RAM| 1 TB UFS 4.0存储。

凭借蓝牙5.3、NFC、红外辐射器和Miracast,小米13 Ultra还提供了一个几乎完整的设备包。

右侧(按键:开/关,音量)
右侧(按键:开/关,音量)
左侧
左侧
顶部(麦克风、扬声器、红外辐射器)
顶部(麦克风、扬声器、红外辐射器)
底部(扬声器、USB接口、麦克风、卡槽)
底部(扬声器、USB接口、麦克风、卡槽)

软件--小米13 Ultra与MIUI

在这次测试时,小米13 Ultra的操作系统是基于Android 13,安全补丁级别为2023年4月。中国制造商增加了一个内部MIUI 14版本的覆盖。全球小米智能手机从高端市场的更新保证现在已经扩大到五年的安全更新和三个大的Android 更新。虽然这是在正确方向上迈出的重要一步,但购买了Galaxy S23 Ultra的买家仍将获得更长的支持,有四个大型的Android 更新。

与其他中国版本的小米智能手机一样,13 Ultra的内部软件在交付状态下不支持谷歌服务,如PlayStore。相反,使用的是中国服务和小米自己的服务。然而,谷歌框架已经在交付状态下预装,所以你只需要手动安装PlayStore。

注意:向我们提供测试机的深圳贸易公司也提供了购买小米13 Ultra和小米.欧盟ROM的选择,该ROM基于中文固件,但扩大了语言选择(也包括德语),并原生添加了谷歌服务。

小米13 Ultra智能手机评测
小米13 Ultra智能手机评测
小米13 Ultra智能手机评测
小米13 Ultra智能手机评测

通信和GNSS - 小米智能手机的5G功能

小米13 Ultra支持目前所有的移动通信标准,包括5G Sub6,但5G mmWave除外。虽然有17个LTE频段,频率覆盖也让我们的中国版本感到满意,但进口设备在一些细节上与欧洲预期的全球版本不同。例如,为中国市场设计的小米13 Ultra缺乏对几个欧洲LTE频段的支持,如20和28频段,这可能会给这个国家(德国)的一些用户带来一些连接问题。

中国版本与全球版本没有区别的地方是对WLAN的支持。通过WiFi 7,小米13 Ultra提供了闪电般的传输速率,但即使使用我们的WiFi 6E华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器,小米智能手机在6GHz网络中达到近1800 Mbit/s,在5GHz以下发送时超过1000 Mbit/s。高数据速率在最大程度上也是稳定的,我们在测量过程中只注意到发送数据时的一些短暂下降。但这些波动相当小,因此,在实践中你应该不会注意到传输速度的下降。

Networking
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
917 (min: 882) MBit/s ∼61%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1002 (min: 985) MBit/s ∼60%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1789 (min: 1557) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1579 (min: 1415) MBit/s ∼91%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
948 (min: 929) MBit/s ∼63%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
941 (min: 880) MBit/s ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1496 (min: 1387) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1671 (min: 801) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1754 (min: 1618) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1504 (min: 1343) MBit/s ∼86%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
904 (min: 453) MBit/s ∼60%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
945 (min: 917) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1645 (min: 1586) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1743 (min: 1585) MBit/s ∼100%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
824 (min: 689) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
826 (min: 776) MBit/s ∼47%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 receive AXE11000
647 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
681 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1542 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1379 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼79%
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1789 (1557-1884)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1754 (1618-1808)
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1579 (1415-1656)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1504 (1343-1604)
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø916 (882-930)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1496 (1387-1627)
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1002 (985-1011)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1645 (801-1815)
在户外定位
在户外定位
在室内定位
在室内定位

我们通过在自行车旅行中与Garmin Venu 2进行比较,更详细地了解了小米旗舰机的定位能力。小米智能手机确定的整体路线长度只多出10米。虽然我们注意到在详细的曲线路线记录中不时有一些较小的不准确之处,但小米13 Ultra仍然成功地创造了整体路线的准确记录。

为了确定其位置,小米13 Ultra使用双频GNSS,支持GPS、Glonass、Galileo、BeiDou和SBAS卫星网络。在日常操作中,它能迅速建立卫星连接,也能在室内提供非常精确的位置。

定位精度的比较:小米13 Ultra与Garmin Venu 2对比

电话功能和语音质量--小米双SIM卡的智能手机

小米13 Ultra智能手机评测
小米13 Ultra智能手机评测

小米13 Ultra支持VoLTE和WLAN通话,以及两个Nano-SIM卡插槽的全5G双SIM卡。然而,没有使用eSIM的可能性。使用听筒,在安静的环境中,语音质量很有吸引力,声音的传输听起来非常自然。当使用扬声器电话模式时,小米旗舰机在安静的环境中也是令人信服的,但声音听起来略显低沉。

照相机 - 小米13 Ultra,带1英寸传感器

用小米13 Ultra拍摄的自拍
用小米13 Ultra拍摄的自拍

在白天,小米13 Ultra的32MP前置摄像头可以创造出具有明显细节程度的有吸引力的照片。尽管分辨率很高,但Ultra机型只能以30帧/秒的最大分辨率录制1080p的视频。前置摄像头不支持像素分选。

与前代产品一样,背面5000万像素镜头四重奏中的相机明星是1英寸格式的索尼IMX989,最大光圈为f/1.9。但13 Ultra的新徕卡Summicron 8P镜头应该能提供更好的图像质量。主摄像头有一个可变光圈,允许用户也选择f/4.0的光圈,以达到更好的深度清晰度,例如。另一方面,你不能像,华为Mate 50 Pro ,可变调整光圈。除了jpegs,你还可以在小米旗舰机上以14比特的RAW格式存储图片,这是与Adobe合作开发的Photoshop或Lightroom。

小米13超的f/1.9光圈
小米13超的f/1.9光圈
小米13超的f/4.0光圈
小米13超的f/4.0光圈

在我们的测试照片中,1英寸格式的传感器显示了许多细节和有吸引力的图像清晰度。用小米13 Ultra拍摄的照片显示出明显比竞争对手少的数字锐化。 另一方面,我们觉得八段式相位对焦不时地做得不太理想,物体的边缘有时显得太软,不符合我们的口味。但小米做得很好的地方是色调--特别是在直接与Honor Magic 5 Pro- 和图片中的动态。由于1英寸的传感器,即使在照片模式下,背景也会在f/1.9下出现迷人的模糊感,这给照片带来了特殊的触感。

默认情况下,50万像素传感器的高分辨率被用于像素分选,这应该有利于低光摄影。正如我们已经看到的,在 小米13 Pro在清晰度方面,小米13 Ultra在暗光条件下也能拍出非常有吸引力的照片。

徕卡的相机软件提供 "活力 "和 "真实 "模式。前者能产生相当饱和和明亮的色彩,而后者则强调图片中的亮部和暗部。我们在图片比较中的照片是用徕卡 "真实 "模式拍摄的。

超广角
超广角
广角
广角
2倍变焦
2倍变焦
3.2倍变焦
3.2倍变焦
5倍变焦
10倍变焦
30倍变焦
120倍变焦

其他三台5000万像素的相机提供索尼IMX858传感器,焦距在12至120毫米之间,同样采用4比1的像素分选工艺。以1/2.51英寸格式制造的传感器在色彩还原方面与IMX989有很好的适应性,所以它们能产生相当统一的色彩图像。

虽然与IMX989相比,超广角镜头在质量方面出现了明显的下降,但以122度的视角拍摄的照片仍然很有吸引力。在清晰度和图像细节方面,小米旗舰机的表现达到了同类水平。有趣的是,该镜头也用于微距摄影,小米在这里没有像在13 Pro中那样使用内部液体镜头设计的长焦镜头。 13 Pro.

两个长焦相机的无损3.2倍和5倍变焦代表了小米13 Ultra的一个优势。由于分辨率高,照片带来了美丽的深度清晰度,能够捕捉到物体的许多细节。你可以从高达10倍变焦水平的相机设置中获得一些非常有吸引力的结果。数字变焦甚至可以达到120倍,加上有吸引力的图像稳定功能,这也可以在没有三角架的情况下使用。

所有四台摄像机都可以用8K分辨率录制视频,超清选项提供每秒最高60帧的视频。你可以在各种镜头之间切换,没有任何明显的停顿。我们非常喜欢主摄像头对移动图像的稳定,但由于缺乏OIS,超广角镜头在质量上无法完全跟上。

小米13 Ultra智能手机评测
小米13 Ultra智能手机评测
小米13 Ultra智能手机评测
小米13 Ultra智能手机评测

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

WeitwinkelWeitwinkelLow LightUltraweitwinkelZoom 5x
click to load images

我们更详细地看一下索尼传感器在受控光线条件下的色彩准确性。测得的与参考色的偏差没有任何真正的离群值(>15),大多数颜色都被小米13 Ultra相当准确地再现。只有青色的亮度略微过高,而白平衡则显得略微温暖。

ColorChecker
6.2 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 13 Ultra: 6.49 ∆E min: 1.82 - max: 14.1 ∆E
ColorChecker
9.8 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 13 Ultra: 7.99 ∆E min: 1.74 - max: 16.6 ∆E

附件和保修 - 小米13 Ultra,含充电器

小米13 Ultra的充电器
小米13 Ultra的充电器

小米13 Ultra的包装盒包括一个90瓦的模块化充电器、一个保护套、一根USB线和一个屏幕保护罩。可选的是,还为爱好摄影的人提供了一个相机套件,连同一个带集成手柄的保护罩、一个相机触发器和一个E67滤镜螺纹,使他们能够使用ND和Pol过滤器。此外,提供我们测试设备的TradingShenzhen公司还在我们的中国版本的包装盒中包括了一个用于充电器的欧盟适配器和一个USB OTG适配器。

小米智能手机的保修期为12个月。通过我们从TradingShenzhen进口的设备,你还可以选择将智能手机寄到德国地址,以备保修索赔。

小米13 Ultra的相机捆绑
小米13 Ultra的相机捆绑

输入设备和操作 - 小米13Ultra带FaceUnlock功能

小米旗舰机提供了一个出色的触摸屏,刷新率为120赫兹,扫描率为240赫兹,确保了输入的快速和准确实施。振动马达提供清晰的触觉反馈,以高质量的水平运行。

为了生物识别安全,显示屏中集成了一个光学指纹传感器。我们的手指被快速可靠地识别。不太安全但同样快速的是日光条件下的二维面部识别。在较差的光线条件下,这种解锁方法的成功率较低。

小米13 Ultra智能手机评测
小米13 Ultra智能手机评测
小米13 Ultra智能手机评测

显示屏 - 小米智能手机采用AMOLED技术

子像素网格的图片
子像素网格的图片

小米不仅在相机上寻找合作伙伴,而且在显示屏领域也寻找合作伙伴。6.73英寸的大型LTPO面板是与TCL合作开发的,提供WQHD+分辨率,动态刷新率为1赫兹至120赫兹。我们也可以从系统数据的读取中确认这些数值。这里使用了一个由一个红色、一个蓝色和两个绿色LED组成的RGBG矩阵。

显示屏的侧面是圆形的。根据制造商的说法,该面板应该达到令人难以置信的2600cd/m²的最大亮度,但我们在测量中无法确认这一点。通过激活亮度传感器的纯白显示屏,小米13 Ultra的显示屏达到1400cd/m²以上,这是一个很好的价值。在光区和暗区均匀分布的情况下(APL18),我们能够从面板上获得高达1628 cd/m²的亮度,这也是一个优秀的结果,尽管它比制造商宣传的最高水平要低很多。

1250
cd/m²
1337
cd/m²
1379
cd/m²
1274
cd/m²
1357
cd/m²
1401
cd/m²
1324
cd/m²
1342
cd/m²
1397
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1401 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1340.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.19 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 1357 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
97.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.73
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
OLED, 3200x1440, 6.73
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2x, 3080x1440, 6.80
Google Pixel 7 Pro
OLED, 3120x1440, 6.70
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
P-OLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Screen
-12%
-31%
8%
-8%
Brightness middle
1357
831
-39%
1117
-18%
1022
-25%
1056
-22%
Brightness
1340
807
-40%
1133
-15%
1025
-24%
1055
-21%
Brightness Distribution
89
91
2%
97
9%
99
11%
92
3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.1
1.03
6%
2.2
-100%
0.9
18%
1.28
-16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.7
3.06
-13%
3.9
-44%
2.1
22%
2.85
-6%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2
1.8
10%
2.3
-15%
1.1
45%
1.7
15%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.233 99%
2.37 93%
2.22 99%
2.206 100%
CCT
6366 102%
6396 102%
6572 99%
6650 98%
6320 103%

* ... smaller is better

像它的 竞争对手一样小米旗舰机的OLED面板也没有摆脱因PWM而产生的闪烁现象。我们的测量结果是120赫兹的恒定频率,有一些短暂的异常值向上。尽管这最初听起来是一个令人不舒服的低频率,但由于平坦的脉冲振幅,我们仍然认为这对眼睛很容易。 然而,制造商本身谈到了1920赫兹的非常高的PWM频率,这应该是更舒适的,特别是对于敏感的用户。我们无法确定这种差异的原因是在于我们的测量设备,还是这种类似于直流调光的自动模式在我们的测试中只被关闭了。

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18242 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最小显示亮度
分钟。
25%的显示亮度
25%
50%的显示亮度
50%
75%的显示亮度
75%
最大手动显示亮度
100%

在固定的变焦水平和各种亮度设置下进行的一系列测量

我们用Calman分析软件和光电光谱仪评估HDR10+和Dolby Vision认证的AMOLED面板的色彩校准。在 "原始 "配置文件中,sRGB色彩空间是目标,几乎完全覆盖。我们在这里得到了非常低的色彩偏差,测量的DeltaE值也显示出灰度的偏差非常小。小米13 Ultra还提供了针对更大的DCI-P3色彩空间的选项,但正如你所期望的那样,这里的色彩再现的偏差略高。

这款来自中国制造商的旗舰产品提供了三个色彩配置文件以及一个 "高级 "模式,允许你调整色彩空间和色温,甚至一些个别参数,如饱和度。此外,你可以使用亮度传感器来自动调整色彩再现。

色彩准确度(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:Original Color Pro,暖色)。
色彩准确度(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:Original Color Pro,暖色)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:Original Color Pro, Warm)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:Original Color Pro, Warm)。
灰度(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:Original Color Pro,暖色)。
灰度(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:Original Color Pro,暖色)。
饱和度(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:Original Color Pro, Warm)。
饱和度(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:Original Color Pro, Warm)。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.04 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5365 ms rise
↘ 0.508 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.02 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.4945 ms rise
↘ 0.5275 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (34 ms).

在户外,Xioami 13 Ultra给人留下了极佳的印象。亮度传感器对变化的光线条件作出快速反应,由于亮度极高,即使是明亮的阳光也无法阻碍OLED面板的可读性。视角稳定性也非常好,即使在非常陡峭的视角下,亮度水平也几乎没有下降。

小米13 Ultra智能手机评测
小米13 Ultra智能手机评测
小米13 Ultra的可视角度
小米13 Ultra的可视角度

性能 - 采用高通SoC的小米智能手机

小米13 Pro,Ultra型号也采用了 骁龙8代2这在我们的基准测试中表现得非常好。在Geekbench 6中,高通SoC提供的数值甚至高于Galaxy S23 Ultra更高,后者使用 骁龙8代2的Galaxy它的时钟速度略高。特别是小米智能手机的多核值变得非常高。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1556 Points +4%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1498 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1048 - 1574, n=18)
1452 Points -3%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1418 Points -5%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1325 Points -12%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
1048 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=212, last 2 years)
902 Points -40%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
5232 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
5082 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (4192 - 5243, n=18)
4945 Points -5%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4399 Points -16%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
4192 Points -20%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
3222 Points -38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=212, last 2 years)
2934 Points -44%
Geekbench 6.0
Single-Core
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1998 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1976 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1753 - 2008, n=10)
1925 Points -4%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1831 Points -8%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
1487 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (188 - 2531, n=44, last 2 years)
1279 Points -36%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
5453 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (4255 - 5702, n=10)
5234 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
5221 Points -4%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
4742 Points -13%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
3862 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 6460, n=44, last 2 years)
3412 Points -37%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1290091 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1111522 - 1322448, n=15)
1263746 Points -2%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1249078 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1226224 Points -5%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1057309 Points -18%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
773857 Points -40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=148, last 2 years)
745745 Points -42%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
15991 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (11562 - 19783, n=19)
15689 Points +2%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
15411 Points
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
15130 Points -2%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13983 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=205, last 2 years)
11537 Points -25%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
11397 Points -26%
CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1242 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1226 Points -1%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1165 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (778 - 1356, n=17)
1154 Points -7%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
886 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1443, n=151, last 2 years)
829 Points -33%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
778 Points -37%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
9563 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
9091 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (7354 - 9730, n=17)
8759 Points -8%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
7466 Points -22%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7068 Points -26%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
6164 Points -36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=151, last 2 years)
5653 Points -41%
System
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
14275 Points +4%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
13765 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (10786 - 15148, n=17)
13206 Points -4%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
11159 Points -19%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10047 Points -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)
9571 Points -30%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
9294 Points -32%
Memory
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
10363 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (6601 - 10821, n=17)
9382 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
9075 Points -12%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
6601 Points -36%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6352 Points -39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12306, n=151, last 2 years)
6152 Points -41%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
5456 Points -47%
Graphics
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
29678 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
28497 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (22837 - 32334, n=17)
27673 Points -7%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
26837 Points -10%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
21947 Points -26%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
16375 Points -45%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)
13749 Points -54%
Web
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1998 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1850 Points -7%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1783 Points -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1077 - 2044, n=17)
1749 Points -12%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
1739 Points -13%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1572 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)
1480 Points -26%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
81854 Points +422%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
42662 Points +172%
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=137, last 2 years)
22542 Points +44%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
16511 Points +5%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
15782 Points +1%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
15683 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (11338 - 16880, n=16)
15326 Points -2%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (941 - 157948, n=14)
12468 Points +861%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 128240, n=89, last 2 years)
12264 Points +845%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1312 Points +1%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1298 Points
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
1008 Points -22%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
941 Points -28%

集成的 阿德雷诺740处理图形加速问题。在GFXbench中,小米13 Ultra有时会达到很高的数值(例如在曼哈顿测试中),但它的表现大多与S23 Ultra的水平相当。 Galaxy S23 Ultra.在野生动物测试中,小米旗舰机也能跟上 骁龙8代2的Galaxy.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3791 Points +2%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3712 Points
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3503 Points -6%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2899 Points -22%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1807 Points -51%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3829 Points +2%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3763 Points
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3280 Points -13%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2873 Points -24%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1847 Points -51%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14369 Points +3%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13995 Points
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11073 Points -21%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6721 Points -52%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
492 fps +1%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
489 fps
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
479 fps -2%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
445 fps -9%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
251 fps -49%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps -1%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
108 fps -10%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
84 fps -30%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
319 fps
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
301 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
261 fps -18%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
247 fps -23%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
139 fps -56%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +11%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
108 fps
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
91 fps -16%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps -48%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
223 fps
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
214 fps -4%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
190 fps -15%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
189 fps -15%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps -55%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
107 fps +67%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 fps +23%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65 fps +2%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
64 fps
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -42%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
128 fps
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
125 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
123 fps -4%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps -23%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps -47%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
85 fps +67%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps +22%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps +18%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51 fps
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps -45%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps +8%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
62 fps
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
61 fps -2%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps -29%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps -50%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +43%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps +17%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
84 fps 0%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
84 fps
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
38 fps -55%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
157 fps +1%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
156 fps
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
151 fps -3%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps -26%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps -52%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
31 fps +7%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
29 fps
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
28 fps -3%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps -28%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps -52%

在浏览器基准测试中,小米13 Ultra与前代产品相比明显领先。 前辈在浏览器基准测试中,小米13 Ultra明显领先于前代产品,并与竞争对手拉开了距离。 竞争对手.在日常操作中,在Chrome浏览器中冲浪感觉非常流畅。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi 13 Ultra (Chrome 113)
162.122 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 109)
159.102 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (62.7 - 179.2, n=18)
128.9 Points -20%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra (Chrome 104)
108.34 Points -33%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=163, last 2 years)
104.1 Points -36%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro (Chrome 112)
100.8 Points -38%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)
98.153 Points -39%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi 13 Ultra (Chrome 113)
151 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 109)
143 runs/min -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (62.9 - 199, n=14)
124 runs/min -18%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)
104 runs/min -31%
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=147, last 2 years)
103 runs/min -32%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra (Chrome 104)
80.8 runs/min -46%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro (Chome 112)
70.4 runs/min -53%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 110)
145 Points +4%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra (Chrome 113)
139 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (28 - 183, n=17)
125.5 Points -10%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra (Chrome 104)
102 Points -27%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro (Chrome 112)
99 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=142, last 2 years)
97.5 Points -30%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)
90 Points -35%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Xiaomi 13 Ultra (Chrome 113)
211 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (115 - 238, n=9)
199.8 Points -5%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro (Chrome 112)
147 Points -30%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra (Chrome 104)
142 Points -33%
Average of class Smartphone (37 - 304, n=119, last 2 years)
131.6 Points -38%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)
98 Points -54%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi 13 Ultra (Chrome 113)
60432 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 109)
59214 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (19870 - 65418, n=20)
44774 Points -26%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)
44245 Points -27%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra (Chrome 104)
36742 Points -39%
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=198, last 2 years)
33270 Points -45%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro (Chrome 112)
31254 Points -48%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=160, last 2 years)
1662 ms * -153%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro (Chrome 112)
1265.2 ms * -92%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra (Chrome 104)
1102.2 ms * -68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (654 - 1837, n=17)
1049 ms * -60%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)
1011.5 ms * -54%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 109)
685 ms * -4%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra (Chrome 113)
657.6 ms *

* ... smaller is better

快速的UFS 4.0存储确保了4000MB/s以上的非常高的数值。只有在读写小数据块时,小米旗舰机的性能才会略微减弱。

Xiaomi 13 UltraXiaomi 12S UltraSamsung Galaxy S23 UltraGoogle Pixel 7 ProMotorola Edge 40 ProAverage 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-33%
-33%
-59%
-1%
-1%
-55%
Sequential Read 256KB
4511.82
1963.45
-56%
3426.56
-24%
1346.78
-70%
3434.4
-24%
3712 ?(3344 - 4512, n=13)
-18%
1428 ?(215 - 4512, n=207, last 2 years)
-68%
Sequential Write 256KB
2878.39
1475.43
-49%
1389.84
-52%
874.73
-70%
2887.4
0%
2980 ?(1891 - 3518, n=13)
4%
1041 ?(57.5 - 3518, n=207, last 2 years)
-64%
Random Read 4KB
398.87
309.21
-22%
449.77
13%
219.01
-45%
451.3
13%
421 ?(268 - 480, n=13)
6%
239 ?(22.2 - 543, n=207, last 2 years)
-40%
Random Write 4KB
507.27
489.58
-3%
152.92
-70%
253.18
-50%
539
6%
530 ?(174.3 - 709, n=13)
4%
263 ?(13 - 709, n=207, last 2 years)
-48%

游戏--小米13超能版只能做到60帧

为了评估 的图形能力。为了评估Adreno GPU在日常运行中的图形能力,我们正在使用我们的合作伙伴GameBench的软件对两款游戏进行研究:.尽管硬件非常强大,但我们在竞技场射击游戏中只得到了微薄的60帧,该游戏理论上支持这里使用的全部120赫兹的显示器。目前还不清楚为什么帧率这么低,因为这不是散热问题造成的。原因可能在于缺乏优化和/或驱动调整。在《PUBG Mobile》中,典型的60帧在高清设置下是可能的,而在最高细节水平(UHD)下,旗舰机达到了恒定的40帧。

氩氦刀
氩氦刀
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Xiaomi 13 Ultra; Armajet: Ø60.9 (55-106)
Xiaomi 13 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø59.8 (50-61)
Xiaomi 13 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.7 (50-62)
Xiaomi 13 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.9 (33-41)

排放--小米智能手机变暖了

温度

虽然小米13 Ultra的表面温度在空闲运行时非常低,但不幸的是,在恒定负载下,情况就不同了,我们测得的最高值超过48℃(118°F)。然而,在与我们测量的最高温度33 °C(91 °F)的比较中,我们在 专业模型我们还应该提到,我们现在使用Burnout基准测试而不是稳定性测试来测量负载下的温度。因此,温度的精确比较不再可能。

小米13 Ultra专门开发的Mi IceLoop散热技术也受到了3DMark的野生动物压力测试的挑战。在大约90%的情况下,小米13 Ultra是最稳定的智能手机之一,配备了 骁龙8代2,现在的节流率明显低于Galaxy S23 Ultra奥普Find X6 Pro.

Max. Load
 47 °C47.9 °C45.8 °C 
 47.5 °C48.4 °C46.8 °C 
 46.9 °C48 °C45.2 °C 
Maximum: 48.4 °C
Average: 47.1 °C
45.3 °C44.8 °C44.3 °C
44.6 °C44.6 °C46.8 °C
43 °C44.8 °C45 °C
Maximum: 46.8 °C
Average: 44.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  28.8 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 47.1 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.4 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wildlife Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
89 %
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 % -22%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67.9 % -24%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65.7 % -26%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53.7 % -40%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
92.2 %
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75.8 % -18%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75.6 % -18%
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
74.6 % -19%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58.7 % -36%
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø20.5 (20.4-22.1)
Xiaomi 12S Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø14.3 (12.6-16.7)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø16.8 (13.5-23)
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø9.93 (8.31-11)
Motorola Edge 40 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø16.2 (14.8-19.9)
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø71.2 (69.2-77.8)
Xiaomi 12S Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø51.6 (33.9-63)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø60 (53.6-77.7)
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø32.8 (26.2-38.6)
Motorola Edge 40 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø61.5 (51.6-78.6)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø72.7 (55.1-86.1)
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø36.5 (30.7-39.8)

发言人

小米13 Ultra的两个Dolby Atmos认证的扬声器产生了一个平衡的声谱,具有均匀的中音,甚至一些低频音。但即使是小米旗舰机也无法提供真正的低频,并呈现出低音的声音,尽管它是这方面最好的智能手机之一。

那些想连接有线声音输出设备的人必须使用USB-C端口。对于无线连接,现代蓝牙5.3是可用的。在支持的编解码器方面,小米13 Ultra提供了广泛的选择,包括SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX自适应、aptX TWS+、LDAC和LHDC V5。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.738.92520.828.5311929.64017.132.25033.436.26320.932.28016.633.710020.541.412516.544.116014.751.22001453.125014.355.231513.155.640013.657.950013.267.563012.371.180012.571.1100011.974.5125012.675.4160012.972.9200013.373.3250012.577.1315013.479.7400013.981.1500013.981.2630013.581.4800013.776.61000013.972.91250013.567.71600013.762.4SPL25.389.5N0.778.2median 13.5median 72.9Delta0.710.133.834.727.935.324.334.828.240.536.739.422.237.525.442.32144.318.648.315.458.615.159.213.161126112.76211.868.212.967.310.473.413.374.813.27812.179.312.279.912.982.314.88115.882.516.182.614.479.613.680.413.578.614.473.51570.225.991.80.789.6median 13.5median 74.81.39hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi 13 UltraSamsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi 13 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命--小米13超的快速充电功能

消耗功率

5,000毫安时的电池可以选择使用USB-C充电,功率高达90瓦,或以最大50瓦的无线方式充电。使用附带的90瓦的充电器,需要大约40分钟才能完全为智能手机充电。根据制造商的说法,使用相应的无线充电站,需要49分钟。除了专有的MI FC 2.0快速充电技术外,这款高端智能手机还支持PD 3.0快速充电协议或QuickCharge 4。

负载下的功耗堪称典范,但在空闲运行时,Galaxy S23 Ultra显示其效率略高于小米旗舰机。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.04 / 0.11 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.86 / 1.53 / 1.64 Watt
Load midlight 3.12 / 6.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
4860 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
5000 mAh
Google Pixel 7 Pro
5000 mAh
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
4600 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
8%
2%
2%
-49%
-36%
-19%
Idle Minimum *
0.86
0.9
-5%
0.9
-5%
0.78
9%
0.7
19%
1.052 ?(0.7 - 2.37, n=18)
-22%
0.899 ?(0.44 - 2.37, n=153, last 2 years)
-5%
Idle Average *
1.53
1
35%
1.05
31%
1.61
-5%
0.8
48%
1.49 ?(0.8 - 2.16, n=18)
3%
1.461 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=153, last 2 years)
5%
Idle Maximum *
1.64
1.2
27%
1.1
33%
1.63
1%
1.3
21%
1.632 ?(1.07 - 2.2, n=18)
-0%
1.642 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=153, last 2 years)
-0%
Load Average *
3.12
3.5
-12%
3.99
-28%
3.29
-5%
10
-221%
6.81 ?(2.61 - 15.3, n=18)
-118%
5.31 ?(2.4 - 15.9, n=153, last 2 years)
-70%
Load Maximum *
6.5
6.9
-6%
7.82
-20%
6.01
8%
13.7
-111%
9.29 ?(4.57 - 17.8, n=18)
-43%
8.05 ?(4.32 - 20.8, n=153, last 2 years)
-24%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.02 (0.681-15.6)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.7 (1.089-14.7)
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.807 (0.712-0.961)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.938 (0.899-1.321)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112Tooltip
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.29 (6.71-7.92)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.6 (10.3-12.7)
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.807 (0.712-0.961)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.938 (0.899-1.321)

电池寿命

小米13 Ultra的电池寿命是令人信服的。我们使用全WQHD+分辨率和120赫兹作为刷新率来评估。在我们的Big Buck Bunny测试视频的不断循环过程中,小米旗舰机并没有显示出通信模块典型的高耗电。大约18个小时,小米旗舰机比它的前辈多持续2个多小时。前代产品在我们的WLAN电池测试中,在调整亮度为150cd/m²的情况下,小米旗舰机比它的前辈多持续了2个小时。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
28h 49min
WiFi Websurfing
17h 45min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 50min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 58min
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
4860 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
5000 mAh
Google Pixel 7 Pro
5000 mAh
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
4600 mAh
Battery Runtime
3%
29%
-18%
5%
Reader / Idle
1729
1766
2%
2139
24%
1210
-30%
2102
22%
H.264
1010
1112
10%
1543
53%
1213
20%
1062
5%
WiFi v1.3
1065
951
-11%
1100
3%
676
-37%
984
-8%
Load
298
327
10%
400
34%
226
-24%
297
0%

Pros

+ 高品质外壳
+ 明亮的ltpo面板与wqhd+
+ 快速的SoC和存储
+ 有吸引力的摄像系统
+ 低节流
+ 快速充电+充电器

Cons

- 前置摄像头中没有 UHD 选项
- 部件发热明显
- 亮度规格有差异

对小米13 Ultra的评价

测试小米13 Ultra。测试装置由深圳贸易公司提供
测试小米13 Ultra。测试装置由深圳贸易公司提供

除了一些较小的批评点之外,小米以其13 Ultra提供了今年最好的智能手机之一。这款来自中国制造商的旗舰智能手机提供了一个广泛的设备清单,巨大的性能,以及由素食皮革和金属制成的高质量外壳。这款小米智能手机实现了令人惊讶的距离,与 骁龙8代2在SoC节流方面与竞争对手取得了惊人的距离。13 Ultra的节流速度明显低于例如Honor Magic 5 ProGalaxy S23 Ultra具有类似的性能发展。

围绕着非常大的索尼图像传感器的相机包在日常操作中提供了非常好的结果。凭借可变光圈和广泛的焦距范围,小米13 Ultra为大多数场景做了出色的准备。我们可能会再次批评用自拍相机录制的视频的低分辨率,它仍然是一个谜,为什么中国制造商不能用32MP镜头提供4K选项,这种缺陷可能对大多数用户的日常操作没有任何影响。那些仍然喜欢创建UHD自拍记录的人可能会在S23 Ultra中找到合适的旗舰替代品。 Galaxy S23 Ultra Pixel 7 Pro.

虽然小米13 Ultra成本高昂的事情,但旗舰智能手机的买家将得到很多东西。

制造商的规格和我们对显示屏亮度的测量之间的差异,肯定值得一些批评。被指定为2600尼特的面板甚至没有接近宣传的最高值,1700cd/m²的亮度仍然大大低于其宣传的能力。 此外,我们一再感到困惑的是,为什么目前的高端智能手机无法(或不允许)在HFR游戏中发挥其全部潜力 - 而随着小米13 Ultra的恒定,这更成为一个谜。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

小米13 Ultra目前作为进口设备从深圳贸易公司购买,起价约1185美元。我们预计全球版本的价格将从约1500欧元(约1658美元)开始。

Xiaomi 13 Ultra - 05/22/2023 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
91%
Keyboard
67%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
67%
Weight
88%
Battery
91 / 86 → 100%
Display
94%
Games Performance
79%
Application Performance
96 / 90 → 100%
Temperature
82%
Noise
100%
Audio
80%
Camera
80%
Average
85%
90%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米13 Ultra评测--为徕卡爱好者提供的具有可变相机光圈的壮观的智能手机
Marcus Herbrich, 2023-05-24 (Update: 2023-05-24)