Notebookcheck Logo

小米13 Lite评测:有品位的中档智能手机,有雄心勃勃的价格标签

溢价价值? 小米13 Lite是小米13系列中最便宜的智能手机,但价格仍高达500欧元。作为回报,这款6.55英寸的设备试图以双自拍相机和1000尼特明亮的圆形显示屏等功能赢得买家的青睐,并且是欧盟第一款配备骁龙7代的智能手机。 我们对这款智能手机进行了试用。
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen
小米13 Lite

小米公司推出了其新一代智能手机。小米13系列取代了去年的12系列,目前有三个版本。除了小米13小米13专业版,该制造商还提供了一个精简版,即小米13 Lite。官方定价约为450美元,是该系列最便宜的迭代产品,因此与其姊妹机型小米13(约850美元)和小米13 Pro(约1080美元)的价格有很大差别。

小米13 Lite在技术上类似于小米12 Lite在许多方面与小米12 Lite相似,也属于中产阶级。只做了一些重大改变,比如相机设置,小米12 Lite的10800万像素主相机已被一个5000万像素的相机取代。作为回报,前置摄像头现在增加了一倍,其3200万像素的主传感器现在由一个800万像素的深度传感器支持,这应确保更好的虚化效果。电池容量也增加了,现在是4500毫安时,而不是以前的4300毫安时。

Xiaomi 13 Lite (13 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Cortex-A710 / A510
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR4X
Display
6.55 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 402 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Touch sampling rate 240 Hz, up to 1000 nits, 500 Nits typ., glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB 
, 222.9 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity sensor, Ambient light sensor, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Electronic compass, Linear motor, IR blaster, VoLTE, VoWiFi, Dolby Atmos, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (Band 2/3/5/8), 3G (Band 1/2/4/5/6/8/19), 4G (Band 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/18/19/20/26/28/32/38/40/41/42/66), 5G (Band 1/3/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41/66/77/78); eSIM support, Head SAR 0.994 W/kg, Body SAR 0.998 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.23 x 159.2 x 72.7
Battery
4500 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Sony IMX766, 1/1.56" sensor size, 1.0 µm pixel size, f/1.8, AF, 86° FOV) + 8 MP Ultra wide camera (1.12 µm pixel size, f/2.2, 119° FOV) + 2 MP Macro camera (f/2.4, fixed focus); videos up to 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix Dual: 32 MP Ultra-wide angle camera (1/2.74" sensor size, 0.8 μm pixel size, f/2.4) + 8 MP Depth sensor (1.12 μm pixel size, f/2.28)
Additional features
Speakers: single, Keyboard: virtual, 67W charger, USB Type-C Cable, SIM Eject Tool, Protective Case, Quick Start Guide, Warranty Card, Safety information, MIUI 14, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
171 g, Power Supply: 97 g
Price
500 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86.4 %
04/2023
Xiaomi 13 Lite
SD 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644
171 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.55"2400x1080
85.8 %
09/2022
Google Pixel 6a
Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20
178 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"2400x1080
87.9 %
03/2022
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
196 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2400x1080
85.6 %
07/2022
Nothing Phone (1)
SD 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L
193.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.55"2400x1080
83.4 %
06/2022
Samsung Galaxy A53
Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4
189 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
85.6 %
09/2022
Xiaomi 12 Lite
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L
173 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.55"2400x1080

表壳 - 弧形显示屏和玻璃背面

与红米和Poco系列的低价智能手机相比,人们立即注意到,小米13 Lite属于更高质量的系列。小米13 Lite的重量为171克,比它的前辈要轻一点,而且由于其不变的纤细设计,握感也非常好。

由于其玻璃背面,这款7.3毫米的扁平智能手机在手中感觉很好,因此与小米12Lite相比,获得了额外的分数。小米12 Lite相比,小米12 Lite不得不使用塑料后盖。由于玻璃背面非常容易沾染指纹,我们建议将智能手机放在附带的透明保护壳中使用。这也可以防止在平面上晃动,否则,由于相机模块突出于机身约2.5毫米,晃动是不可避免的。

与小米12 Lite相比,受大猩猩玻璃5保护的AMOLED显示屏的长边是圆的,这就是为什么显示屏与表面的比例略好,为89%(小米12 Lite:88%)。由于前置摄像头有两个镜头,摄像头缺口明显扩大,类似于iPhone 14 Pro机型的 "动态岛",其轮廓呈药丸状,这可能不会吸引所有人。弧形显示屏出厂时贴有保护膜。

与小米12 Lite一样,小米13 Lite的边框也是由塑料制成,将前后两部分结实地固定在一起。如果用最小的力气将这个纤细的智能手机扭向一边,可以听到吱吱的声音。另一方面,事实证明,显示屏和后盖在压力下非常稳定,几乎不能被压住。

小米13 Lite有三种颜色,即 "Lite blue"(像我们的测试设备)、"Lite pink "和 "Lite black"。

小米13 Lite
小米13 Lite
小米13 Lite
小米13 Lite
小米13 Lite
小米13 Lite
小米13 Lite
小米13 Lite
小米13 Lite
小米13 Lite

尺寸比较

163.1 mm 76 mm 8.8 mm 196 g159.6 mm 74.8 mm 8.1 mm 189 g159.2 mm 75.8 mm 8.3 mm 193.5 g159.3 mm 73.7 mm 7.29 mm 173 g159.2 mm 72.7 mm 7.23 mm 171 g152.2 mm 71.8 mm 8.9 mm 178 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备 - 8GB内存和高达256GB的内存

小米官方在欧盟提供的13 Lite只有一个存储版本:8GB的LPDDR4X内存和128GB的UFS 2.2存储空间,价格为400-500欧元,取决于地点。在网上,你可以很容易地买到第二个存储版本,它也提供8GB内存和256GB存储空间,而且几乎不贵。这款智能手机没有用于内存扩展的microSD插槽。

除了用于相机和家庭影院设备的红外发射器外,还有NFC、蓝牙5.2和一个能以USB 2.0速度工作的具有OTG功能的USB-C端口。然而,小米12 Lite的立体声扬声器在继任者身上已不复存在。相反,小米13Lite不得不使用位于USB-C端口旁边的单个扬声器。

左边:没有端口
左边:没有端口
右边:电源键,音量摇杆开关
右边:电源键,音量摇杆开关
顶部:麦克风、红外传感器
顶部:麦克风、红外传感器
底部:SIM卡插槽(2个纳米SIM卡),麦克风,USB-C 2.0,扬声器
底部:SIM卡插槽(2个纳米SIM卡),麦克风,USB-C 2.0,扬声器

软件 -Android 12和MIUI 14

小米13 Lite运行Android 12和小米内部MIUI用户界面的14版。据小米称,该智能手机将获得三次操作系统升级和四年的安全更新。在审查时(3月底),Android 安全补丁是从2023年1月1日开始的,因此不再是特别最新的。

除了必须的谷歌应用程序和一些制造商自己的工具,如文件管理器、小米远程控制和小米社区,一些第三方应用程序也安装在小米13 Lite上。但如果你不需要Audible、Bing、Booking.com、Facebook、TikTok、Spotify等,这些可以直接卸载。

小米13 Lite
小米13 Lite
小米13 Lite
小米13 Lite
小米13 Lite
小米13 Lite
小米13 Lite
小米13 Lite

通信和GNSS - 非常快的WiFi 6E和精确的GPS

小米13 Lite支持目前所有的移动电话标准,包括5G-Sub6。由于广泛的频率覆盖,包括13个5G和21个4G频段,该智能手机在大多数地方连接到移动网络应该没有什么问题。

关于WLAN,小米13通过WiFi 6连接到WiFi网络。虽然它不能通过6GHz频段进行通信,但由于160兆赫的频谱,它仍然非常快。

与我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器配合使用,这款智能手机实现了稳定的、最重要的、出色的传输速率,峰值为1757MBit/s。这样一来,小米13显然超过了它的前辈。其他中档竞争对手,如 谷歌Pixel 6a三星Galaxy A53,在Wi-Fi测试中无法跟上小米13 Lite的步伐。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1440 (1312min - 1540max) MBit/s
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
933 (833min - 949max) MBit/s -35%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
897 (449min - 907max) MBit/s -38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=209, last 2 years)
655 MBit/s -55%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
633 (204min - 699max) MBit/s -56%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
345 (328min - 351max) MBit/s -76%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1757 (1611min - 1817max) MBit/s
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
976 (863min - 1003max) MBit/s -44%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
946 (459min - 973max) MBit/s -46%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
898 (852min - 931max) MBit/s -49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=210, last 2 years)
692 MBit/s -61%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
269 (255min - 281max) MBit/s -85%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone
  (229 - 1894, n=61, last 2 years)
1536 MBit/s
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
946 (926min - 951max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone
  (598 - 1840, n=61, last 2 years)
1364 MBit/s
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
598 (517min - 731max) MBit/s
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 644; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1440 (1312-1540)
Xiaomi 12 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642L; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø626 (204-699)
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 644; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1757 (1611-1817)
Xiaomi 12 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642L; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø976 (863-1003)
GPS-Empfang im Gebäude
GPS-Empfang im Gebäude
卫星定位系统(GPS-Empfang im Freien
卫星定位系统(GPS-Empfang im Freien

小米13 Lite的定位是通过GPS(L1)、Glonass(L1)、Galileo(E1)和Beidou(B1,B1C)进行的。该功能在室内和室外都非常迅速,精确度为3米。

我们还在一次10公里的自行车骑行中测试了智能手机的实际追踪能力,同时还带上了Garmin Venu2健身追踪器进行直接比较。智能手机很好地完成了它的工作,除了最小的离群值之外,几乎精确地记录了所覆盖的路线,因此非常适合于日常导航任务,就像谷歌地图一样。

GPS测试:总结
GPS测试:总结
GPS测试:绕湖而行
GPS测试:绕湖而行
GPS测试:循环
GPS测试:循环

电话和语音质量

小米13 Lite支持VoLTE以及Wi-Fi通话,可以使用两张nano-SIM卡,以及一张nano-SIM卡和一张eSIM。

在测试中,小米13 Lite提供了良好的语音质量。来电者的声音被清晰自然地再现,干扰性的背景噪音被可靠地抑制。在免提模式下,轻微的回声不时出现,但其他方面的良好可懂度仍然如此。

相机 - 双自拍相机和索尼IMX766,5千万像素

用自拍相机拍照
用自拍相机拍照

小米13 Lite采用双前置摄像头,由一个3200万像素自拍镜和一个800万像素深度传感器组成。这也解释了缺口的形式,按照Android ,它是不寻常的,因为它是丸状的,因为它现在容纳了两个传感器,而不是通常的一个。

在良好的照明条件下,自拍显得很体面,100°的视角意味着可以将几个人纳入照片中。800万像素的传感器负责人像模式下的深度信息。然而,在测试中,与标准自拍相机相比,它并没有真正提供任何附加值。

从纸面上看,相机的设置是一种退步:小米省略了1.08亿像素的主传感器。小米12 Lite(三星HM2),并安装了著名的索尼IMX766,其分辨率为50MP,通过4合1像素拍摄12MP照片。如果你想要全分辨率,你可以切换到50MP的图片模式。

百万像素的规格对图像质量说明不了什么,这在我们的测试中也很明显。小米13Lite的主摄像头不得不用不到小米12Lite的一半的MP数量,但在白天和光线不足的情况下都能拍出更好的照片,因此在中档范围内遥遥领先。

索尼IMX766能很好地捕捉到对比度和色彩。在低残光下,颜色有些褪色,但细节水平仍高于平均水平,这在与小米12 Lite的直接比较中尤为明显。另一方面,主摄像头在变焦拍摄中只提供平均质量,因为照片在2倍以上的放大倍数时看起来不再非常清晰。最大的变焦水平是10倍。

800万像素的超广角相机和200万像素的微距相机在质量上落后于5000万像素的主传感器。前者的工作做得很好,但在边缘的模糊问题上很吃力。微距相机由于分辨率低,几乎没有任何附加价值。

视频记录最大为4K,每秒30帧,而全高清可以达到60FPS。录像令人印象深刻,而且稳定可靠。

用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用超广角镜头拍照
用超广角镜头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照
用主摄像头拍照

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photo 1Daylight photo 2Ultra wide angle5x zoomLow light

在受控的照明条件下,小米13 Lite的索尼IMX766合理地真实地再现了色彩。然而,该传感器在准确捕捉青色、深棕色和绿色调方面有困难。主摄像头再现了测试图的细节,但在图像的边缘仍然显示模糊。另一方面,即使在1勒克斯的余光下,测试图仍然完全可见。

ColorChecker
25.2 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
30.2 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
11 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
17 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
12 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 13 Lite: 13.45 ∆E min: 1.21 - max: 30.24 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.6 ∆E
47.4 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
42.6 ∆E
56.1 ∆E
47.1 ∆E
30.1 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
58.4 ∆E
59.7 ∆E
27 ∆E
42.8 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
67.4 ∆E
37.9 ∆E
38.9 ∆E
63.8 ∆E
63.8 ∆E
49 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 13 Lite: 41.53 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 67.45 ∆E

附件和保修 - 交货范围内包括67瓦的电源装置

包括67瓦的电源装置。
包括67瓦的电源装置。

小米13 Pro的交货范围包括一个67瓦的电源,一个透明的保护罩,一条USB线(A型到C型),一个SIM卡工具,一份快速入门指南和另一份包含安全说明的单页。

小米在欧盟为其智能手机提供12个月的保修。这在非欧盟国家可能有所不同,所以在购买前一定要向供应商查询。

输入设备和操作 - 带有心率监测器的指纹传感器

小米13 Lite的电容式触摸屏以240赫兹的触摸采样率工作,对输入的反应很快,也能精确地实现它们。再加上高达120赫兹的刷新率,这使得操作起来非常流畅。

位于显示屏下方的光学指纹传感器可以快速、可靠地解锁小米13Lite。另外,还可以通过不太安全的2D面部识别方法进行生物认证。另一个优点是Always-on显示屏,它可以在任何时候打开,并可以永久显示时间、日期和电池电量等元素。

单手操作模式也可以在附加设置下激活。还可以选择通过指纹传感器测量心率。一次测量需要15秒。

纵向模式下的键盘
纵向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘

显示器 - AMOLED面板,1000尼特

子像素矩阵
子像素矩阵

小米13 Lite的6.55英寸AMOLED显示屏的分辨率为2400 x 1080像素,这在表面上使其与小米12 Lite没有什么区别。 小米12 Lite.刷新率,根据显示的内容最高可达120赫兹,对所有常见HDR标准(杜比视界HDR10、HDR10+和HLG)的支持也保持不变。

然而,与前代相比,AMOLED显示屏的亮度有所增加。它的平均亮度为903.6cd/m²,甚至高于小米12 Lite,我们在那里测得的平均亮度为772.9cd/m²。

在均匀分布的明亮和黑暗图像区域(APL18测量),小米13 Lite增加到最大1036 cd/m²。当亮度传感器关闭时,最大可达到516 cd/m²。在最低亮度水平,亮度为1.89 cd/m²。

与大多数采用OLED面板的智能手机一样,小米13 Pro的显示屏也会出现闪烁。不过,由于小米使用了1920赫兹的友好型直流调光方法,那些对脉冲宽度调制反应敏感的用户应该不会因此而感到困扰。

小米的特殊直流调光过程,在恒定的120赫兹下,在我们的示波器上的整个亮度光谱上都是明显的。在71-421赫兹的频率范围内,可以看到小的离群值。

900
cd/m²
902
cd/m²
906
cd/m²
900
cd/m²
905
cd/m²
903
cd/m²
908
cd/m²
905
cd/m²
903
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 908 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 903.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 905 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
97.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
Xiaomi 13 Lite
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Google Pixel 6a
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.10
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.70
Nothing Phone (1)
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Samsung Galaxy A53
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
Xiaomi 12 Lite
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Screen
3%
-2%
-7%
-23%
-15%
Brightness middle
905
758
-16%
649
-28%
620
-31%
718
-21%
757
-16%
Brightness
904
767
-15%
649
-28%
625
-31%
730
-19%
773
-14%
Brightness Distribution
99
93
-6%
98
-1%
98
-1%
92
-7%
97
-2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1
0.9
10%
1.18
-18%
1.24
-24%
1.62
-62%
1.3
-30%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3
2.5
17%
2.07
31%
2.31
23%
4.21
-40%
3.4
-13%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.2
1.6
27%
1.5
32%
1.7
23%
2
9%
2.5
-14%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.2 100%
2.236 98%
2.318 95%
2.156 102%
2.22 99%
CCT
6382 102%
6599 98%
2538 256%
6325 103%
6545 99%
6403 102%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最小显示亮度
闵行区。
25%的显示亮度
25%
50%的显示亮度
50%
75%的显示亮度
75%
最大手动显示亮度
100%

在固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置下进行的一系列测量

小米13 Lite的AMOLED显示屏提供了非常精确的色彩表现。这可以通过从标准色彩方案 "鲜艳"切换到 "原色"来实现。然后,该面板提供了模范的色彩再现,DeltaE值远低于3,尽管它只使用sRGB色彩空间。另一方面,在标准的Vivid 设置中,使用的是更大的DCI-P3色彩空间。

色彩保真度(配色方案:原色,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩保真度(配色方案:原色,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配色方案:原色,目标色彩空间:sRGB)。
色彩空间(配色方案:原色,目标色彩空间:sRGB)。
灰度(配色方案:原色,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(配色方案:原色,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩饱和度(配色方案:原色,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩饱和度(配色方案:原色,目标色彩空间:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.671 ms rise
↘ 0.5445 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5935 ms rise
↘ 0.6525 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

小米13 Lite在户外表现非常好,这要归功于其视角稳定和明亮的AMOLED面板。即使在晴天,它仍然有足够的亮度储备以确保良好的可读性。作为选择,你可以在显示设置中停用自动亮度,转而开启阳光模式,从面板中挤出最大亮度。

户外使用(阴天,自动亮度)。
户外使用(阴天,自动亮度)。
户外使用(阴天,自动亮度)。
户外使用(阴天,自动亮度)。
户外使用(在阳光下,自动亮度)。
户外使用(在阳光下,自动亮度)。
视角稳定
视角稳定

性能--骁龙7代的首演

小米13 Lite是德国第一款配备了 骁龙7代1.这款中端SoC采用了四个ARM Cortex-A710性能内核,时钟频率高达2.4GHz,以及一个由四个Cortex-A510内核组成的效率集群,时钟频率为1.8GHz。据ARM称,高性能内核比Cortex-A78内核快10%,效率高35%。据称,与旧的Cortex-A55内核相比,效率内核的性能提高了35%,效率提高了20%。

在我们的测试中,骁龙7 Gen 1提供了良好的中端性能。然而,在合成基准测试中,其性能优势比 骁龙778G 5G小米12 Lite是相当小的。的 Google Tensor中的 谷歌Pixel 6a骁龙8代1中的 摩托罗拉Edge 30 Pro正如预期的那样,处于更高的水平。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1195 Points +51%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
1025 Points +30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=217, last 2 years)
918 Points +16%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
824 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (775 - 826, n=4)
793 Points 0%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
791 Points
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
783 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
740 Points -6%
Multi-Core
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3659 Points +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=217, last 2 years)
3009 Points +4%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2998 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (2854 - 3094, n=4)
2943 Points +2%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
2940 Points +2%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2932 Points +1%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
2894 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1878 Points -35%
Geekbench 6.0
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (188 - 2531, n=44, last 2 years)
1279 Points +37%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
934 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  ()
934 Points 0%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 6460, n=44, last 2 years)
3412 Points +33%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
2571 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  ()
2571 Points 0%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
970465 Points +67%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)
738503 Points +27%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
715338 Points +23%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
582264 Points 0%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
581838 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (544011 - 593635, n=5)
568349 Points -2%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
516991 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
409976 Points -30%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13611 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (10389 - 12632, n=5)
11891 Points 0%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
11890 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=213, last 2 years)
11798 Points -1%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
11662 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
11470 Points -4%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
11461 Points -4%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
9717 Points -18%
CrossMark - Overall
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
865 Points +31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=165, last 2 years)
837 Points +26%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
760 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (662 - 704, n=4)
683 Points +3%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
662 Points
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
658 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
579 Points -13%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7070 Points +56%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
5950 Points +31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=165, last 2 years)
5745 Points +27%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4768 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (4296 - 4795, n=5)
4622 Points +2%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
4539 Points
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4314 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3626 Points -20%
System
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10739 Points +22%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
10424 Points +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=165, last 2 years)
9678 Points +10%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
9517 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (8634 - 10067, n=5)
9335 Points +6%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
9109 Points +4%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
8797 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
7157 Points -19%
Memory
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7357 Points +68%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
6592 Points +50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=165, last 2 years)
6250 Points +43%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4763 Points +9%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4602 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (3640 - 4970, n=5)
4468 Points +2%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
4385 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3855 Points -12%
Graphics
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
17159 Points +125%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
14148 Points +86%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=165, last 2 years)
14101 Points +85%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
8175 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (7612 - 8150, n=5)
7760 Points +2%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
7612 Points
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
6681 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
5178 Points -32%
Web
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1843 Points +28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=165, last 2 years)
1494 Points +3%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
1476 Points +2%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
1445 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (1330 - 1525, n=5)
1418 Points -2%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
1273 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1210 Points -16%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
1184 Points -18%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
29413 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=150, last 2 years)
21814 Points -26%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
21639 Points -26%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
20784 Points -29%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
18855 Points -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (7374 - 29413, n=5)
12886 Points -56%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
4239 Points -86%
AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
44527 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  (668 - 47384, n=4)
34697 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 245629, n=105, last 2 years)
17833 Points -60%

对于图形加速,该SoC使用了 阿德雷诺644GPU,据说比集成在骁龙778G 5G中的像素加速器快20%左右。 骁龙778G 5G中的像素加速器。在合成基准测试中,小米13 Lite的表现好于 小米12Lite,但性能优势并不明显,如在合成基准测试中。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1626 Points +96%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1567 Points +89%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
829 Points
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
686 Points -17%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
684 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
621 Points -25%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2040 Points +143%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1629 Points +94%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
838 Points
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
692 Points -17%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
687 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
636 Points -24%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7261 Points +139%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6483 Points +114%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3035 Points
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2576 Points -15%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2483 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2275 Points -25%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6695 Points +116%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6351 Points +105%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3095 Points
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2570 Points -17%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2468 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2293 Points -26%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3335 Points
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2854 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2689 Points -19%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2550 Points -24%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6053 Points
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5412 Points -11%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5277 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3902 Points -36%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5125 Points
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4513 Points -12%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4264 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3546 Points -31%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4833 Points +45%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4518 Points +36%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4277 Points +29%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3325 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3097 Points -7%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8957 Points +32%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6767 Points
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5759 Points -15%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5577 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3982 Points -41%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7205 Points +31%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5501 Points
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5428 Points -1%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5393 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3746 Points -32%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +5%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
113 fps 0%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
113 fps
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
108 fps -4%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
81 fps -28%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -47%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
306 fps +108%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
252 fps +71%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
147 fps
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
141 fps -4%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
133 fps -10%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
92 fps -37%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +57%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
76 fps
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps -3%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
68 fps -11%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -21%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
56 fps -26%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
158 fps +80%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
151 fps +72%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
88 fps
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
82 fps -7%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
77 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
61 fps -31%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
109 fps +85%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +2%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
59 fps
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps -2%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
49 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
35 fps -41%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +89%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
100 fps +59%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps +2%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
63 fps
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps -11%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
38 fps -40%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps +100%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps +59%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps -3%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
28 fps -18%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20 fps -41%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
86 fps +132%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps +41%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps 0%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
37 fps
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps -11%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23 fps -38%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +150%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps +63%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps -8%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
15 fps -37%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps +163%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps +75%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15 fps -6%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10 fps -37%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps +151%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps +10%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
39 fps
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps -8%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23 fps -41%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps +120%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps +26%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
46 fps
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -13%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
38 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
26 fps -43%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps +92%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.3 fps
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6.7 fps -8%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.1 fps -16%

Basemark GPUScore

0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Xiaomi 13 Lite; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø9.82 (5.55-114.2)
Xiaomi 13 Lite; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø12.8 (7.81-120.3)
Xiaomi 13 Lite; GPUScore: Sacred Path; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.1: Ø3.52 (2.71-5.45)
Xiaomi 13 Lite; GPUScore: Sacred Path; Official Native; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.1: Ø4.65 (3.61-10.5)

小米13 Lite在浏览器性能方面令人信服,但总体上不比小米12 Lite快。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99)
121.6 Points +64%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)
106.1 Points +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (64.3 - 115.8, n=5)
90.3 Points +22%
Xiaomi 12 Lite (Chrome 105)
84.417 Points +14%
Google Pixel 6a (Firefox 1ß4-2-ß)
75.261 Points +1%
Xiaomi 13 Lite (Chrome 111.0.5563.115)
74.161 Points
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
73.679 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
63.5 Points -14%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chome 99)
129 runs/min +92%
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)
107.1 runs/min +59%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)
90.4 runs/min +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (61.5 - 87.4, n=5)
69.5 runs/min +3%
Xiaomi 13 Lite (Chrome 111.0.5563.115)
67.2 runs/min
Xiaomi 12 Lite (Chrome 105)
57.4 runs/min -15%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chome 103)
53.71 runs/min -20%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chome 101)
51.24 runs/min -24%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=160, last 2 years)
100.2 Points +27%
Xiaomi 13 Lite (Chrome 111.0.5563.115)
79 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (58 - 92, n=5)
77.8 Points -2%
Xiaomi 12 Lite (Chrome 105)
74 Points -6%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)
72 Points -9%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
69 Points -13%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99)
167 Points +46%
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)
133.1 Points +17%
Xiaomi 13 Lite (Chrome 111.0.5563.115)
114 Points
Xiaomi 12 Lite (Chrome 105)
110 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (106 - 114, n=2)
110 Points -4%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
102 Points -11%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)
77 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
69 Points -39%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99)
50626 Points +82%
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=211, last 2 years)
33640 Points +21%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)
33046 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (21143 - 34866, n=5)
29627 Points +7%
Xiaomi 13 Lite (Chrome 111.0.5563.115)
27804 Points
Xiaomi 12 Lite (Chrome 105)
26441 Points -5%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
24488 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
24159 Points -13%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
1920.3 ms * -39%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
1796.1 ms * -30%
Xiaomi 12 Lite (Chrome 105)
1618.2 ms * -17%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)
1595 ms * -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (1208 - 2686, n=5)
1574 ms * -14%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)
1531.6 ms * -11%
Xiaomi 13 Lite (Chrome 111.0.5563.115)
1384.1 ms *
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99)
819 ms * +41%

* ... smaller is better

UFS 2.2存储提供高传输率,明显优于 小米12 Lite特别是在连续写入方面。小米13 Lite在4KB随机读写中的表现也要好得多。

Xiaomi 13 LiteGoogle Pixel 6aMotorola Edge 30 ProNothing Phone (1)Samsung Galaxy A53Xiaomi 12 LiteAverage 256 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-8%
29%
21%
-35%
-28%
-19%
14%
Sequential Read 256KB
1001.82
1312.64
31%
1832
83%
1638
64%
510.1
-49%
943.11
-6%
Sequential Write 256KB
871.96
712.94
-18%
1028
18%
1351.9
55%
486.7
-44%
486.78
-44%
690 ?(369 - 913, n=22)
-21%
Random Read 4KB
277.33
219.53
-21%
277.7
0%
240.6
-13%
229.9
-17%
196.37
-29%
Random Write 4KB
301.41
225.61
-25%
339.5
13%
228.2
-24%
210.8
-30%
199.91
-34%

游戏--触摸采样率为240赫兹

ǞǞǞ 阿德雷诺644的GPU 骁龙7代1结合240赫兹的触摸采样率,确保了小米13 Lite的良好游戏性能。然而,在我们的三款测试游戏PUBG Mobile、Subway Surfers和Armajet中,它无法充分利用120赫兹的屏幕。

使用我们的Gamebench测试工具,小米在高清/超清和HDR/超清下运行PUBG Mobile,基本稳定在40帧(目前不支持超高清和UHD设置)。在图形要求不高的《地铁冲浪者》中,智能手机被限制在60帧,尽管它在这里可以提供更多。Armajet设定的帧率限制为90赫兹,也被节制了。

PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
氩氦刀
氩氦刀
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Xiaomi 13 Lite; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø89.2 (84-90)
Xiaomi 13 Lite; PUBG Mobile; 2.5.0: Ø39.5 (34-41)
Xiaomi 13 Lite; PUBG Mobile; 2.5.0: Ø39.5 (22-41)
Xiaomi 13 Lite; Subway Surfers; 3.9.0: Ø60.5 (50-61)

排放--带Dolby Atmos的单扬声器

温度

在运行中,小米的中端手机始终保持低温,即使在满负荷的情况下,也只加热到34.1℃的最高表面温度。高能效的 骁龙7代1确保引擎盖下的温度始终保持适度。3DMark的Wild Life压力测试提供了这方面的证明。

小米13 Lite在温和的3DMark Wild Life场景和要求更高的Wild Life Extreme场景中都实现了超过99%的稳定性。该测试场景在整个系列测量中始终保持相同的速度,没有任何明显的性能损失。

Max. Load
 33.9 °C33.7 °C31 °C 
 34.1 °C32.6 °C31.9 °C 
 33.9 °C33.5 °C30.5 °C 
Maximum: 34.1 °C
Average: 32.8 °C
30.3 °C30.7 °C31.7 °C
29.7 °C30.7 °C32.6 °C
29.9 °C31.3 °C32.6 °C
Maximum: 32.6 °C
Average: 31.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  27.1 °C | Room Temperature 20.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.6 % 0%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 %
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.5 % 0%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % 0%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57.4 % -42%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42.9 % -57%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.7 % 0%
Xiaomi 13 Lite
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 %
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 % -1%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
97.8 % -2%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59.6 % -40%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49.2 % -51%
0123456789101112131415161718Tooltip
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø4.99 (4.97-5)
Xiaomi 12 Lite Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø4.12 (4.11-4.13)
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.5 (18.5-18.6)
Xiaomi 12 Lite Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 1.0.9.1: Ø14.8 (14.7-14.8)
小米13 Lite
小米13 Lite

发言人

两个变成一个:虽然小米12 Lite仍然配备了立体声扬声器,但小米13 Lite只有一个扬声器,尽管它也支持杜比全景声。不过,声音图像还是相当单薄,对高音的强调程度很高。

有线音频设备可以通过USB-C适配器连接。蓝牙5.2和所有常见的蓝牙编解码器都可以无线使用(SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive、aptX TWS+、LDAC和LDAC V1-4)。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs202942.22525.336.23125.733.84026.733.15029.340.26321.140.48017.840.91001742.112513.14416012.65120011.749.425011.154.23151257.540010.959.850011.965.663010.465.38009.769.1100010.777.9125011.977.4160011.180.4200011.779.6250012.379.4315013.580.9400012.580.2500012.679.7630013.380.6800013.682.41000014.184.41250013.577.51600013.269.1SPL24.491.6N0.588.1median 12.3median 77.5Delta1.19.65338.644.538.433.728.833.434.535.837.630.128.621.323.52121.516.327.714.738.212.94514.351.21353.110.857.112.362.713.566.519.571.61578.514.177.914.97611.976.612.87615.472.616.573.216.767.517.272.31865.117.963.817.658.518.351.82886.10.962.1median 15median 65.12.210.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi 13 LiteSamsung Galaxy A53
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi 13 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A53 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 小米13 Lite的4500毫安时

消耗功率

在同类产品的比较中,小米13 Lite的耗电量很低。在所有的负载情况下,这款智能手机只需很少的能量就能搞定,甚至能够压倒经济型的 小米12 Lite.

交付范围包括一个67瓦的电源适配器,用它可以对4500毫安时的电池快速充电。在我们的测试中,从0到100%的电池充电需要56分钟。16分钟后达到50%。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.05 / 0.18 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.74 / 1.56 / 1.59 Watt
Load midlight 3.33 / 7.59 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi 13 Lite
4500 mAh
Google Pixel 6a
4410 mAh
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
4800 mAh
Nothing Phone (1)
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A53
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 12 Lite
4300 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-13%
-43%
-6%
-15%
-8%
-44%
-18%
Idle Minimum *
0.74
0.68
8%
1.2
-62%
1
-35%
0.9
-22%
0.83
-12%
1.012 ?(0.74 - 1.23, n=5)
-37%
Idle Average *
1.56
1.56
-0%
1.6
-3%
1.2
23%
1.3
17%
1.78
-14%
2.19 ?(1.2 - 4.44, n=5)
-40%
Idle Maximum *
1.59
1.58
1%
2.5
-57%
1.5
6%
1.6
-1%
1.81
-14%
2.3 ?(1.4 - 4.49, n=5)
-45%
Load Average *
3.33
5.37
-61%
5.2
-56%
4.2
-26%
5.7
-71%
3.83
-15%
5.84 ?(3.33 - 11.2, n=5)
-75%
Load Maximum *
7.59
8.74
-15%
10.4
-37%
7.4
3%
7.3
4%
6.6
13%
9.26 ?(5.5 - 11.3, n=5)
-22%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112Tooltip
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.68 (0.899-12.4)
Xiaomi 12 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.74 (0.953-7.76)
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.917 (0.854-1.267)
Xiaomi 12 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.076 (0.91-1.275)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345Tooltip
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.19 (3.78-5.87)
Xiaomi 12 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.74 (3.48-4.11)
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.917 (0.854-1.267)
Xiaomi 12 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.076 (0.91-1.275)

电池寿命

小米13 Lite的电池寿命很稳定,实际上和它的前辈一样持久。模拟网上冲浪近14小时和视频播放近20小时的时间并不是运行时间记录,但将确保用户在一次充电后可以舒适地度过一天。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
37h 20min
WiFi Websurfing
13h 42min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
19h 45min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 21min
Xiaomi 13 Lite
4500 mAh
Google Pixel 6a
4410 mAh
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
4800 mAh
Nothing Phone (1)
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A53
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 12 Lite
4300 mAh
Battery Runtime
0%
-8%
-9%
-2%
-21%
Reader / Idle
2240
1878
-16%
1985
-11%
1813
-19%
2431
9%
1566
-30%
H.264
1185
1318
11%
1006
-15%
1059
-11%
1146
-3%
876
-26%
WiFi v1.3
822
768
-7%
816
-1%
926
13%
886
8%
712
-13%
Load
321
360
12%
306
-5%
259
-19%
246
-23%
279
-13%

Pros

+ 轻薄的设计
+ 高质量
+ 明亮的120Hz AMOLED面板
+ 永远在线的显示
+ 快速的WiFi 6
+ 得体的主摄像头
+ 用67瓦的电源适配器快速充电

Cons

- 大的相机凹槽
- 没有内存扩展
- 只有一个扬声器
- Android 只有12个
- 没有IP等级

对小米13 Lite的评判

在审查中:小米13 Lite。测试设备由德国小米公司提供。
在审查中:小米13 Lite。测试设备由德国小米公司提供。

小米13 Lite是一款不错的中端智能手机,在外观和构造方面能够与许多高端机型抗衡。这款智能手机的时尚和超薄设计并不是唯一令人印象深刻的方面,其内部组件也值得称赞。

小米12 Lite,相机是亮点之一,尽管传感器的百万像素数量从108个缩减到5000万像素。然后,小米13 Lite中的索尼IMX766拍摄的照片明显更好,是中档范围内最好的智能手机光学器件之一。

小米13 Lite作为一款优秀的中端智能手机令人信服,但对于它所提供的性能来说,还是有点太贵了。

区别于小米12Lite的许多优势仍然存在:略微明亮的AMOLED面板,120赫兹和永远在线功能,67瓦的快速充电和良好的电池寿命。变化的是 骁龙778 5G骁龙7 Gen 1另一方面,由于整体性能仅有小幅提高,因此变化相当不明显。

小米13 Lite的批评点包括单声道扬声器,特别是由于前代产品中安装了立体声扬声器。宽大的自拍相机缺口也不一定能让所有人满意,正如该智能手机只配备了Android 12。

小米13 Lite的替代品包括 三星Galaxy A53谷歌Pixel 6a.

价格和可用性

有兴趣的买家可以直接通过Aliexpress查询价格和运输费用。,它提供了一个全球版本的智能手机,有多种货币。例如:

  • 美国:469.00美元
  • 英国:£388.38
  • 荷兰:450,97欧元
  • 印度:39,833.34卢比
  • 巴西:R$ 2.464,55
  • 新加坡:643.51新加坡元
  • 加拿大:CA 645.86美元
  • 澳大利亚:澳币714.66元
  • 南非:8,623.88南非兰特

这个清单并不 详尽。当然,小米13 Lite在你的国家可能已经可以从当地经销商/分销商处以更便宜的价格购买。无论怎样,这些例子可以作为比较值。

价格截止到12.04.2023,可能会有变化。

Xiaomi 13 Lite - 04/06/2023 v7
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
86%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
51 / 70 → 72%
Weight
91%
Battery
91%
Display
93%
Games Performance
55 / 64 → 86%
Application Performance
78 / 86 → 90%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%
Audio
79 / 90 → 88%
Camera
73%
Average
80%
86%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米13 Lite评测:有品位的中档智能手机,有雄心勃勃的价格标签
Manuel Masiero, 2023-04-13 (Update: 2023-04-13)