Notebookcheck Logo

三星Galaxy S22 Ultra比较。骁龙8代与Exynos 2200对比--欧洲被骗了吗?

Galaxy 智能手机中的SoC是否有区别? Galaxy S22 Ultra的许多潜在买家肯定也会喜欢欧洲的高通骁龙8代。特别是因为Xclipse 920 GPU在我们的审查中有些令人失望。采用Exynos SoC的Galaxy S22 Ultra到底值不值得购买?我们在下面的对比评测中阐明了这一点。
Touchscreen Smartphone Galaxy S
审查。三星Galaxy S22 Ultra Snapdragon 8 Gen.1.

在我们的审查中,我们对三星的目前的旗舰智能手机 ,只留下了部分印象。这款Galaxy 手机总体上变成了一个非常成功的包装,但它仍然有一些磨合的问题。

特别是,三星围绕处理器的政策引起了一些问题。该Exynos SoC旨在欧洲市场的Exynos SoC被热切期待,特别是由于与AMD的合作。不幸的是,这并没有完全达到我们在上述评论中的期望,这足以让我们看一下这个版本的 三星Galaxy S22 Ultra的版本。 高通Snapdragon 8 Gen.1该版本在欧洲以外的零售商,如我们的租赁合作伙伴Trading Shenzhen,有售。等等。

那些正在寻找除SoC之外的详细信息的人,例如外壳软件 通信的各个部分,应该看看我们详细的 评论三星Galaxy S22 Ultra的详细评论。6.8英寸的动态AMOLED显示屏也或多或少有相同之处。我们测量到骁龙版本的亮度极低,这可以解释为生产中的轻微质量波动。

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon (Galaxy S Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio
Graphics adapter
Memory
12288 MB 
Display
6.80 inch 19.3:9, 3088 x 1440 pixel 501 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 102 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, OTG, Miracast
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.9 x 163.3 x 77.9
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix (f/1.8, 24mm, 1/1.33", 0.8µm) + 10MP (10x optical zoom, f/4.9, 230mm, 1/3.52", 1.12µm) + 10MP (3x optical zoom, f/2.4, 70mm, 1/3.52", 1.12µm) + 12MP (f/2.2, 13mm, 1/2.55", 1.4µm)
Secondary Camera: 40 MPix (f/2.2, 26mm, 1/2.82", 0.7µm)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Virtual, USB cable, OneUI, 12 Months Warranty, widevine L1, fanless, waterproof
Weight
228 g
Price
1400 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

照相机。三星智能手机的108MP

与三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| 骁龙8代1的自拍。
与三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| 骁龙8代1的自拍。
与三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| Exynos 2200自拍
与三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| Exynos 2200自拍

的规格三星Galaxy S22 Ultra骁龙版本和本地 骁龙版本和本地的Exynos版本在相机硬件方面几乎是相同的 - 技术数据可以在我们详细的 评论.有趣的是,Galaxy 智能手机及其高通芯片组支持略高的相机2 API级别,而3级。

在日常使用中,骁龙版本的三星Galaxy S22 Ultra和Exynos版本一样,在白天使用108MP光学器件和三星ISOCELL HM3时,能提供良好到非常好的效果。

我们喜欢三星Galaxy S22 Ultra骁龙版的结果,总体上要好一点,因为在困难的照明条件下,动态范围要高一些,主体的模糊程度要低一些。然而,这种清晰度的提高并没有带来更高的细节水平,我们在黑暗区域检测到轻微的图像噪音。如果在黑暗中拍摄被摄体,观察到的趋势会加强。骁龙版本的噪点明显更多,但锐度和动态效果比Exynos版本好。

广角

三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| 骁龙8代1。
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| 骁龙8代1。
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| Exynos 2200
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| Exynos 2200
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| 骁龙8代1。
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| Exynos 2200
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| 骁龙8代1。
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| Exynos 2200
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| 骁龙8代1。
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| Exynos 2200
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| 骁龙8代1。
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| Exynos 2200
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| 骁龙8代1。
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| Exynos 2200
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| 骁龙8代1。
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| Exynos 2200
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| 骁龙8代1。
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| Exynos 2200

骁龙版的超广角摄像头三星Galaxy S22 Ultra骁龙版的超广角摄像头与10800万像素摄像头的调校类似。与骁龙版相比,颜色略微变亮 Exynos版本
,但照片产生的动态范围更大,图像噪点更多一些。

在我们3倍和10倍的变焦范围内,我们更喜欢Exynos版本的照片。特别是在3倍的放大率下,清晰度比骁龙版本的三星Galaxy S22 Ultra更吸引人。

超广角

三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| 骁龙8代1。
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| 骁龙8代1。
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| Exynos 2200
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| Exynos 2200
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| 骁龙8代1。
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| Exynos 2200
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| 骁龙8代1。
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| Exynos 2200
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| 骁龙8代1。
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| Exynos 2200
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| 骁龙8代1。
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| Exynos 2200

变焦拍摄(3倍、10倍)

三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| 骁龙8代1。
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| 骁龙8代1。
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| Exynos 2200
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| Exynos 2200
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| 骁龙8代1。
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| Exynos 2200
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| 骁龙8代1。
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| Exynos 2200
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| 骁龙8代1。
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| Exynos 2200
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| 骁龙8代1。
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| Exynos 2200
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| 骁龙8代1。
三星Galaxy S22 Ultra| Exynos 2200

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

ColorChecker
6.7 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon: 5.94 ∆E min: 1.2 - max: 11.25 ∆E
ColorChecker
25.9 ∆E
42.1 ∆E
32.9 ∆E
30.9 ∆E
37.6 ∆E
50.2 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
27.9 ∆E
28.6 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
51.1 ∆E
52 ∆E
26.5 ∆E
37.1 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
48.8 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
53.3 ∆E
44.8 ∆E
33.7 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon: 36.13 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 53.33 ∆E

性能。Galaxy S22 Ultra的高通SoC芯片名列前茅

两款Galaxy 的日常表现都非常好,而Exynos 2200在欧洲使用的Exynos 2200足够强大,能够流畅地驱动120赫兹能力和高分辨率的OLED面板。然而,在 三星Galaxy S22 Ultra配备的 骁龙8代在我们的基准测量中要强大得多,但也应该注意到,我们还得到了12GB内存的版本用于测试。

在CPU测试和图形基准测试中,高通SoC有时比Exynos 2200高出30%。在浏览器测试中,差异也出乎意料地明显,配备骁龙8代的三星Galaxy S22 Ultra表现得非常好。另一方面,在GFXBench的非屏幕值中,高通SoC的表现并不理想。在这里,Galaxy S22 Ultra骁龙的速度明显比Exynos版本慢。

UFS 3.1的速度差异同样令人惊讶。这些差异在日常使用中是否明显,当然值得商榷--我们发现应用程序的加载时间同样快--但三星Galaxy S22 Ultra与骁龙8代的基准测试值相当惊人,特别是在连续阅读方面。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1249 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1154 Points ∼92% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1182 - 1298, n=15)
1233 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=253, last 2 years)
673 Points ∼54% -46%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3377 Points ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
3560 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (3269 - 3839, n=15)
3557 Points ∼100% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=253, last 2 years)
2201 Points ∼62% -35%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13752 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
12579 Points ∼91% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (12144 - 17025, n=15)
13714 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 18567, n=148, last 2 years)
10178 Points ∼74% -26%
3DMark
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
9409 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
7236 Points ∼77% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (6351 - 10062, n=11)
9201 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (216 - 10062, n=184, last 2 years)
3182 Points ∼34% -66%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
9455 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
7288 Points ∼75% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (6483 - 10412, n=15)
9672 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (205 - 11700, n=185, last 2 years)
3377 Points ∼35% -64%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2432 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
2044 Points ∼83% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1629 - 2639, n=14)
2470 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 3080, n=140, last 2 years)
984 Points ∼40% -60%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2421 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1916 Points ∼79% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1567 - 2585, n=15)
2424 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 2864, n=136, last 2 years)
971 Points ∼40% -60%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
52 fps ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
42 fps ∼69% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (39 - 98, n=14)
60.5 fps ∼100% +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 98, n=249, last 2 years)
28.8 fps ∼48% -45%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
90 fps ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
68 fps ∼68% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (60 - 131, n=16)
100.6 fps ∼100% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.9 - 123, n=250, last 2 years)
34.1 fps ∼34% -62%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
37 fps ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
31 fps ∼68% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (27 - 69, n=14)
45.4 fps ∼100% +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.1 - 69, n=250, last 2 years)
19.9 fps ∼44% -46%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
39 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
30 fps ∼77% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (19 - 49, n=16)
39.1 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 47, n=250, last 2 years)
13 fps ∼33% -67%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
30 fps ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
39 fps ∼77% +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (28 - 81, n=12)
50.5 fps ∼100% +68%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.3 - 81, n=194, last 2 years)
27.5 fps ∼54% -8%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
60 fps ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
68 fps ∼87% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (60 - 98, n=13)
78.2 fps ∼100% +30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 97, n=194, last 2 years)
32.9 fps ∼42% -45%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
897098 Points ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
704479 Points ∼74% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (821646 - 1041980, n=14)
946438 Points ∼100% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (111952 - 1041980, n=112, last 2 years)
552824 Points ∼58% -38%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
122.985 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
96.8 Points ∼79% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (77.3 - 126.3, n=12)
105.3 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (12.4 - 182.6, n=170, last 2 years)
62.3 Points ∼51% -49%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
228.963 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
200 Points ∼87% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (121.9 - 237, n=11)
195.6 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10.8 - 414, n=167, last 2 years)
115.5 Points ∼50% -50%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
832.81 ms * ∼26%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1259 ms * ∼40% -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (819 - 1440, n=12)
1033 ms * ∼33% -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (414 - 15230, n=183, last 2 years)
3158 ms * ∼100% -279%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
120 runs/min ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
108 runs/min ∼90% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (64.4 - 129.3, n=12)
104.5 runs/min ∼87% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9 - 244, n=156, last 2 years)
61 runs/min ∼51% -49%
CrossMark
Creativity (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1173 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
958 Points ∼82% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (878 - 1228, n=9)
1100 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (201 - 1321, n=52, last 2 years)
737 Points ∼63% -37%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1089 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
942 Points ∼87% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (811 - 1169, n=9)
1041 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (226 - 1169, n=52, last 2 years)
735 Points ∼67% -33%
Productivity (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1033 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
912 Points ∼88% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (741 - 1092, n=9)
984 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (37 - 1140, n=52, last 2 years)
726 Points ∼70% -30%
Responsiveness (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1121 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
987 Points ∼88% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (840 - 1192, n=9)
1052 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (227 - 1213, n=52, last 2 years)
747 Points ∼67% -33%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
78 fps ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
108 fps ∼100% +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (60 - 121, n=12)
92.3 fps ∼85% +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 121, n=194, last 2 years)
56.2 fps ∼52% -28%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
141 fps ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
187 fps ∼96% +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (141 - 265, n=13)
195.5 fps ∼100% +39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.4 - 251, n=195, last 2 years)
80.2 fps ∼41% -43%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G SnapdragonSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5GAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-9%
-14%
-51%
Sequential Read 256KB
1987.91
1653
-17%
1781 ?(1330 - 2037, n=47)
-10%
934 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=246, last 2 years)
-53%
Sequential Write 256KB
1368.55
1074
-22%
954 ?(452 - 1559, n=47)
-30%
474 ?(11.9 - 1485, n=246, last 2 years)
-65%
Random Read 4KB
314.68
322.3
2%
265 ?(181 - 345, n=47)
-16%
167.1 ?(13.5 - 345, n=246, last 2 years)
-47%
Random Write 4KB
268.9


273.1
2%
274 ?(218 - 458, n=48)
2%
160.5 ?(56.5 - 458, n=247, last 2 years)
-40%

游戏:Galaxy 智能手机仍有改进的余地

两个版本的Galaxy S22 Ultra提供了一个没有问题的平滑显示。正如在使用GameBench 应用程序的测量,我们的测试游戏没有发现任何值得一提的帧数下降。然而,使用高通公司的版本,PUBG移动游戏的帧率可以明显提高。

在配备Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 的三星Galaxy S22 Ultra上,射击游戏的运行帧数高达60帧。此外,UHD选项被解锁,这在配备Xclipse 920的Galaxy S22 Ultra上是不可用的 。在《英雄联盟》中。在《英雄联盟:狂野裂变》中,90帧和120帧的高帧设置在这两款Galaxy ,所以Adreno 730 ,也只能在60帧的情况下执行。

审查。三星Galaxy S22 Ultra Snapdragon 8 Gen.1.
审查。三星Galaxy S22 Ultra Snapdragon 8 Gen.1.
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 1.9.0: Ø29.8 (26-31)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø59.4 (51-61)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.6 (50-61)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.9.0: Ø29.9 (28-31)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.7 (32-41)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; League of Legends: Wild Rift: Ø59.5 (47-61)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; League of Legends: Wild Rift; 3.0.0.5295: Ø59.5 (55-61)

排放和电池寿命:Galaxy ,与之相当的手机

两个版本的表面温度和功耗水平相似。三星Galaxy S22 Ultra.为了更好地评估SoC的性能,我们使用3DMark压力测试。与 其他智能手机搭配 骁龙8代1,Galaxy S22 Ultra显示出明显的性能损失,约为40%。话说回来, Exynos 2200 也显示出低效的冷却。


相比之下,QHD Plus分辨率和自适应显示控制下的电池运行时间比预期的长。在我们的实际Wi-Fi测试中,调整后的显示亮度为150cd/m²,Galaxy S22 Ultra及其高通SoC只持续了约12.5小时。在我们对Exynos版本的测试中,这个时间超过14小时。

3DMark - Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon
63 (8.22min - 13.1max) % ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
61.8 (7.76min - 12.6max) % ∼98% -2%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
012345678910111213Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; 1.0.9.1: Ø9.83 (8.22-13.1)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; 1.0.8.1: Ø9.2 (7.76-12.6)

温度

Max. Load
 35.7 °C35.1 °C35.8 °C 
 35.9 °C34.9 °C34.8 °C 
 36.1 °C36.1 °C33.8 °C 
Maximum: 36.1 °C
Average: 35.4 °C
33.6 °C34.9 °C34.6 °C
33 °C35.2 °C35.7 °C
32.5 °C33.9 °C35.9 °C
Maximum: 35.9 °C
Average: 34.4 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.


审查。三星Galaxy S22 Ultra Snapdragon 8 Gen.1.
审查。三星Galaxy S22 Ultra Snapdragon 8 Gen.1.

消耗功率

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1: Ø6.13 (1.234-12.1)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200: Ø6.91 (0.893-15.5)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011121314Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.41 (6.23-14)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.17 (6.42-14.4)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 1min: Ø0.773 (0.66-1.105)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200; Idle 1min: Ø0.625 (0.575-1.393)

电池寿命

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
5000 mAh
Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
756
844
12%
907 ?(438 - 1953, n=254, last 2 years)
20%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
12h 36min

关于三星Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon的裁决

比较。三星Galaxy S22 Ultra Snapdragon 8 Gen 1。评测设备由深圳贸易公司提供。
比较。三星Galaxy S22 Ultra Snapdragon 8 Gen 1。评测设备由深圳贸易公司提供。

在欧洲,三星是否用自己的Exynos 2200 ,欺骗了我们? 在纯性能和游戏适用性方面,可以支持这一说法。然而,在效率方面,Galaxy S22 Ultra 的两个型号变体的表现都差不多。下一代产品的情况将变得非常有趣,因为未来的高通SoC 将不再由三星自己生产,而是再次由台湾的芯片制造商台积电生产。

质量差异在相机上也很明显,尽管骁龙版本在这里不是明显的赢家。那些喜欢用他们的Galaxy 智能手机使用高焦距的人可以对Exynos 2200感到高兴,因为图像清晰度比我们使用高通SoC的评测设备更高。较低的图像噪音也表明三星的图像处理器对噪音的抑制更加有效。作为回报,骁龙8代1.0的ISP(图像信号处理器)比高通SoC的更有效。骁龙8代1骁龙8代的ISP(图像信号处理器)能够更好地处理具有暗影区和明亮阳光的复杂照明条件。

那些对进口像三星Galaxy S22 Ultra这样价格昂贵的智能手机没有任何保留的人,使用骁龙版本将获得更好的设备,但使用Exynos版本的买家并不处于很大的劣势。进口设备的软件也可能与当地的软件不同(取决于原产地区)。

价格和可用性

骁龙版本的三星Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G在深圳贸易公司的售价约为1,317欧元。.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 三星Galaxy S22 Ultra比较。骁龙8代与Exynos 2200对比--欧洲被骗了吗?
Marcus Herbrich, 2022-05-30 (Update: 2022-05-30)