小米12S Ultra评论。配备巨大徕卡相机的5G智能手机让我们感到好奇

Name: Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Brand: Xiaomi

市场上最好的摄像智能手机？ 小米以12S Ultra的形式推出了一款令人印象深刻的旗舰级相机智能手机。一个巨大的1英寸传感器应该使12S Ultra不亚于移动摄影领域的最佳智能手机。阅读这篇评论，了解这款配备骁龙8+第一代的智能手机在这方面是否成功。

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 09/05/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Smartphone Android

小米12S Ultra是一款真正的高端智能手机，其内置的高通骁龙8+ Gen 1，UFS 3.1存储，以及6.73英寸120 Hz LTPO显示屏。然而，小米旗舰机的亮点是背面的相机模块，它容纳了一个1英寸格式的5000万像素传感器，由徕卡公司共同开发。

市场上几乎没有任何其他智能手机提供如此大的图像传感器。从纯粹的技术角度来看，即使是索尼的Xperia Pro-I也只使用了IMX 383的一部分，其尺寸为2.54厘米（1英寸）。强大的相机硬件还伴随着新的Leticia软件。12S Ultra可以利用两种模式，"Leica Authentic Look "用于拍摄具有更强空间深度的自然照片，"Leica Vibrant Look "用于拍摄更明亮和温暖的氛围。

Test device courtesy of tradingshenzhen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi 12S Ultra (12 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 730

Memory

12 GB

Display

6.73 inch 20:9, 3200 x 1440 pixel 526 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, OLED, Gorilla Glass Victus, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB

, 224 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, barometer,, OTG, Miracast, IR Blaster

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, 5G NR: N1 / N3 / N28a / N41 / N78 / N79; 4G: B1 / B2 / B3 / B4 / B5 / B7 / B8 / B12 / B17 / B18 / B19 / B26 / 34 / B38 / B39 / B40 / B41 / B42; 3G: 850/1900/2100MHz; 2G: 850/900/1800/1900MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 9.1 x 163.2 x 75

Battery

4860 mAh, 65 Watt charging, 50 Watt wireless charging, 10W reverse charging

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 12

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/1.9, OIS) + 48 MP (f/2.2, wide angle lens) + 48 MP (f/4.1, OIS, periscope-telephoto lens)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix ( f/2.45, 1080p/60fps)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, case, EU adapter, USB cable, charger , MIUI 13, 12 Months Warranty, Widevine L1, fanless, waterproof

Weight

225 g, Power Supply: 182 g

Price

1100 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
88.8 %	09/2022	Xiaomi 12S Ultra SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730	225 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.73"	3200x1440
89.4 %	03/2022	Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920	228 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.80"	3088x1440
89.2 %	04/2022	Oppo Find X5 Pro SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	221 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	3216x1440
87.7 %	08/2022	Sony Xperia 1 IV SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	185 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.50"	3840x1644
87.5 %	08/2022	ZTE Axon 40 Ultra SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	204 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.80"	2480x1116

保护壳 - 小米12S Ultra素皮保护壳

小米11 Ultra的陶瓷外壳小米11 Ultra已被小米12S Ultra中的一种素食皮革所取代，制造商称之为 "徕卡纹理"。因此，这款旗舰机的重量已经从234克略微减少到225克。然而，外形因素几乎保持不变，这意味着它在用户手中仍然相当重，尺寸也很大。这款相当头重脚轻的上等智能手机的重量分布也可以处理得更好。

由于背部相对柔软，在触觉方面没有任何妥协，但前辈的陶瓷材料感觉更有价值--但这可能更多是个人品味的问题。另一方面，油腻的指纹被有纹理的表面很好地掩盖了。

小米12S Ultra的正面由防刮的康宁大猩猩玻璃Victus制成，与金属框架略微融合。边框和玻璃之间的过渡可以更圆滑，符合我们的口味，所以设计上仍然有些棱角分明。由于相对较薄的边框，显示屏和设备正面之间的比例是很好的89%，而S22 Ultra的边框则是Galaxy S22 Ultra的边框甚至更薄。

做工是一流的，安装好的钥匙牢牢地坐在框架中。此外，该机壳通过了官方的IP68认证，使小米12S Ultra既防尘又防水。

尺寸比较

Sony Xperia 1 IV Xiaomi 12S Ultra Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Oppo Find X5 Pro ZTE Axon 40 Ultra DIN A6 ❌

设备 - 带有USB2.0的小米智能手机

小米12S Ultra有三个存储版本，从8GB内存和256GB内部存储的基本版本开始，一直到顶级型号，其中包含12GB和512GB。我们的评测样本中的UFS 3.1存储容量为256GB，但在交付状态下只有224GB。这款高端智能手机的内部存储不能被扩展。

这款小米旗舰机的功能包括红外辐射器，用于快速连接外部配件的USB OTG，以及屏幕内容的无线图像传输。由于USB 2.0标准，数据只能通过外壳底部的Type-C端口非常缓慢地传输。有线图像传输，如在竞品因此，小米12S Ultra无法实现。

软件--小米智能手机与Android 12

小米12S Ultra的操作系统是基于Android 12。在审查时，安装的最新安全补丁是7月份的，因此相对来说是最新的。全球小米12系列的更新保证，即三个主要的Android 更新和四年的安全更新，是否也适用于中国独家的顶级机型，我们无法确定。

与中国版本的小米手机一样，12S Ultra的内部软件不支持谷歌服务，如Play Store的出厂。相反，使用的是中国服务和小米自己的服务。不同于华为的智能手机，用户不需要没有谷歌服务。谷歌框架已经开箱预装，所以只有Play Store需要手动安装。然而，除了中文和英文之外，没有其他语言可以选择。

通信与GNSS - 小米12S Ultra与快速WLAN

小米使用蓝牙5.2和NFC芯片作为通信模块。还有Play Protect认证，所以谷歌支付等支付服务应该可以在小米12S Ultra上使用。

这款旗舰机为家庭无线局域网提供了WiFi 6和8x8多用户MIMO，这确保了高而相对稳定的传输速率。结合我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器，小米智能手机实现了超过900Mbps的传输速率，但在测试中没有识别6GHz范围。

连接功能清楚地表明，小米12S Ultra不是为德语国家准备的。它只支持接入15个LTE频段，并没有覆盖所有相关的LTE频率供当地使用。频段20和28被省略了。5G可用于快速上网，但不支持毫米波。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Sony Xperia 1 IV Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1226 (590^min - 1346^max) MBit/s +29%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	948 (929^min - 953^max) MBit/s
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	900 (844^min - 951^max) MBit/s -5%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	820 (799^min - 837^max) MBit/s -14%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	716 (539^min - 791^max) MBit/s -24%
Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=210, last 2 years)	654 MBit/s -31%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Sony Xperia 1 IV Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1590 (1449^min - 1712^max) MBit/s +69%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	941 (880^min - 952^max) MBit/s
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	890 (433^min - 934^max) MBit/s -5%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	831 (428^min - 859^max) MBit/s -12%
Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=211, last 2 years)	690 MBit/s -27%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	521 (311^min - 704^max) MBit/s -45%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Sony Xperia 1 IV Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1748 (870^min - 1823^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1704 (852^min - 1767^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (229 - 1894, n=61, last 2 years)	1536 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1702 (1642^min - 1735^max) MBit/s
Sony Xperia 1 IV Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1459 (723^min - 1535^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (598 - 1840, n=61, last 2 years)	1364 MBit/s

Xiaomi 12S Ultra; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø948 (929-953)

Xiaomi 12S Ultra; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø941 (880-952)

小米12S Ultra的定位能力并不完美。为了在实践中评估其跟踪的准确性，我们带着小米智能手机进行了一次短途旅行，并用Garmin Venu 2记录路线进行比较。

GPS记录的详细视图中的偏差有时非常明显，导致路线过程中出现明显的不准确。大多数主要的双频卫星系统都用于定位，如北斗（B1I+B1C+B2a）、GPS（L1+L5）、伽利略（E1+E5a）、GLONASS（G1）和QZSS（L1+L5）。然而，改变方向给小米12S Ultra带来了问题。鉴于快速定位，甚至在室内，以及广泛的卫星选择，跟踪的缺陷是不寻常的，可能与MIUI频繁的限制性节能措施有关。

电话和语音质量 - 小米双卡智能手机

这款来自小米的中国旗舰机支持两张纳米SIM卡和双VoLTE HD以及双5G。但在测试中，VoLTE不支持Telekom SIM卡。我们无法从中国主页的数据表中找到eSIM功能的程度。我们只在设置中找到了内部的小米SIM卡，它只在中国使用。

通过Telekom网络的语音质量很好。声音被清晰地再现，我们的通话伙伴也认为是清晰的。

在测试中，使用内置的前置摄像头通过Skype进行的视频通话也是完美无缺的。通过内置扬声器的通话质量也很好，内置的麦克风可以清晰地传输声音。

照相机 - 小米智能手机配备三摄像头

高分辨率的3200万像素自拍相机，位于前面的一个冲孔中，可以捕捉到清晰和详细的图像。然而，这款旗舰机在视频记录领域有弱点，因为只能拍摄1080p的视频。

在背面，小米12S Ultra有一个徕卡相机系统--确切地说，是Summicron 1:1.9-4.1 / 13-120 ASPH，包括三个后置镜头。除了具有5000万像素的1英寸索尼IMX989（35毫米等效焦距：23毫米，f/1.9），两个4800万像素的传感器被用于超广角（13毫米，f/2.2）和潜望镜（120毫米，f/4.1）相机。

索尼IMX989在明亮的光线下提供了非常好的图像清晰度，没有人为的过度锐化，有吸引力的色彩和强烈的动态。曝光也很好地掌握了明亮镜头下的困难图像区域。由于1英寸的传感器，即使在照片模式下，背景也大多是模糊的，这给小米12S Ultra的照片增加了一种特殊的感觉，与 Galaxy S22 Ultra或 iPhone 13 Pro.

小米智能手机在低光环境下也表现良好。传感器捕捉到大量的环境光，自动对焦在黑暗中的工作令人满意，尽管我们希望能有更多的清晰度。相机软件在这里只做了一点锐化处理。照片中的动态效果，特别是在蜡烛区，是一流的。

带有5倍光学变焦和OIS的长焦相机在放大到10倍的情况下取得了非常好的效果。图像的特点是有很多细节，在日光下有很好的清晰度。然而，超广角摄像头明显比主摄像头差。与相机相比，小米12S Ultra在广角拍摄中也缺乏清晰度。.

视频记录

小米12S Ultra可以用高达8K的分辨率以每秒30帧的速度录制视频，以60帧的速度录制UHD质量的视频，甚至以960帧的速度录制1080p的视频。防抖效果非常好，在4K30的录制过程中可以改变镜头（超/广角）。小米在这里成功地结合了一致的色彩和白平衡。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera Main camera Low light Ultra wide angle

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

我们用ColorChecker Passport进行的颜色分析显示，与实际参考颜色相比，有令人满意的偏差，尽管绿色调尤其明显地更亮。在受控的照明条件下，灰色调也有明显的差异。

配件和保修 - 小米12S Ultra带电源适配器

小米12S Ultra配备了一个67瓦的模块化电源适配器，一条USB线和一个保护壳外壳。还安装了保护膜的前工程。此外，我们的借贷合作伙伴TradingShenzhen为我们的评测样品的中文版补充了一个欧盟的充电器适配器和一个USB OTG适配器。

小米智能手机的保修期为12个月。通过我们从TradingShenzhen进口的样品，我们可以选择在保修期内将智能手机发送到德国的运输地址。

输入设备和操作 - 小米智能手机，240赫兹

小米12S Ultra的用户将受益于120赫兹的高刷新率，以及高达240赫兹的采样率。玻璃表面具有出色的滑行性能，可准确识别多达10次的触摸。在这款高端智能手机上打字也是非常愉快的。小米还安装了一个很好的振动马达，在日常使用中提供不错的触觉反馈。

小米12S Ultra的指纹传感器像大多数旗舰机一样被集成到显示屏上，因此是看不见的。光学传感器反应迅速，也能准确检测到手指。然而，这并不是超声波技术，如在三星Galaxy S22 Ultra，后者更加安全，对不干净的手指不那么敏感。那些想用人脸识别来解锁屏幕的人可以通过前置摄像头来解锁，但由于是2D方法，用人脸进行生物识别不是很安全。

显示器 - 小米智能手机采用OLED

在3200x1440的分辨率下，数字内容显示得很清晰，120赫兹的高刷新率也与竞争对手持平。LTPO 2.0面板可以通过自适应控制降低到1赫兹，我们通过查看开发人员的设置确认了这一点。

我们对小米12S Ultra的亮度测量有些令人失望。6.73英寸的Super AMOLED显示屏在800cd/m²以上就足够亮了，但在我们的测量中，Galaxy S22 Ultra要亮得多。我们还用更真实的APL18测试了显示屏亮度，在那里我们登记了983 cd/m²的高亮度水平，但离制造商1500尼特的规格仍有距离。在某些情况下，小米智能手机的面板有可能达到超过1000cd/m²的指定亮度，但这不太可能与日常使用有关。作为比较，一个Galaxy S22 Ultra在我们的APL18测试中，几乎完全达到了1800尼特的广告规格，为1788cd/m²。

对于亮度控制，小米智能手机使用脉冲宽度调制（PWM），频率为122-366赫兹，但周期曲线非常恒定，类似于直流调光。在开发者设置中还可以找到一个额外的防闪烁模式。


831 cd/m²	799 cd/m²	842 cd/m²
796 cd/m²	831 cd/m²	769 cd/m²
802 cd/m²	801 cd/m²	794 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

AMOLED tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 842 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 807.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1.45 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 831 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.03 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.233

	Xiaomi 12S Ultra OLED, 3200x1440, 6.73	Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Dynamic AMOLED, 3088x1440, 6.80	Oppo Find X5 Pro AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.70	Sony Xperia 1 IV OLED, 3840x1644, 6.50	ZTE Axon 40 Ultra AMOLED, 2480x1116, 6.80	Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.81
Screen		20%	10%	14%	-32%	-9%
Brightness middle	831	1077 30%	746 -10%	890 7%	682 -18%	891 7%
Brightness	807	1093 35%	744 -8%	897 11%	683 -15%	888 10%
Brightness Distribution	91	97 7%	97 7%	97 7%	94 3%	99 9%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.03	1.2 -17%	0.9 13%	0.9 13%	1.8 -75%	1.9 -84%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.06	2 35%	1.6 48%	2.4 22%	4.7 -54%	3.7 -21%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.8	1.3 28%	1.6 11%	1.4 22%	2.4 -33%	1.3 28%
Gamma	2.233 ^99%	2.37 ^93%	2.23 ^99%	2.21 ^100%	2.16 ^102%	2.3 ^96%
CCT	6396 ^102%	6526 ^100%	6499 ^100%	6320 ^103%	6634 ^98%	6527 ^100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

186.5 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 186.5 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 186.5 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

在固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置下进行的一系列测量

除了明显的对比度，小米12S Ultra还提供HDR10+和高色彩空间覆盖。实际上，在sRGB中看不到任何差异。该面板的校准工作非常好，这一点在我们用光谱仪的分析中得到了证实。CalMAN软件的结果是平均Delta-E偏差非常低，分别为1（颜色）和1.8（灰度）。然而，必须使用较小的sRGB色彩空间才能达到高精确度。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.9 ms rise
1.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.7 ms rise
1.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

只要启用自动模式，小米旗舰机就可以在户外无限制地使用。高亮度和巨大的对比度在阳光直射下提供了吸引人的户外体验。然而，一个 Galaxy S22 Ultra一旦玻璃表面出现反射，就有更多的亮度储备。

OLED面板的可视角度稳定性非常好。即使在平坦的视角下，显示内容的颜色也相对真实、生动。

性能 - 采用高通SoC的小米12S Ultra

Snapdragon 8+ Gen.小米12S Ultra采用的是4纳米SoC，基于三个集群，其中包括一个主核（Cortex X2）、三个性能核（Cortex A710）和四个省电单元（Cortex A510）。该处理器可以利用集成的 Adreno 730进行图形加速。

在我们的CPU基准测试中，小米12S Ultra的定位是领先于华硕ROG手机6 Pro特别是在多核性能方面，骁龙8+1代优于其前辈。前辈.

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi 12S Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1325 Points
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432	1309 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (897 - 1389, n=23)	1280 Points -3%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1257 Points -5%
Sony Xperia 1 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1237 Points -7%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1217 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	1154 Points -13%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288	989 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 2138, n=219, last 2 years)	913 Points -31%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 12S Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	4399 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (3782 - 4436, n=23)	4173 Points -5%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432	4162 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	3560 Points -19%
Sony Xperia 1 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	3489 Points -21%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	3488 Points -21%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288	3462 Points -21%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	3289 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6681, n=219, last 2 years)	2996 Points -32%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432	1119358 Points +6%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1057309 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (782013 - 1119358, n=21)	997518 Points -6%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	922942 Points -13%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	856953 Points -19%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288	801983 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)	738503 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	704479 Points -33%
Sony Xperia 1 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	692924 Points -34%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432	17727 Points +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (11029 - 17727, n=22)	14796 Points +6%
Sony Xperia 1 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	14267 Points +2%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	13983 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288	13982 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	12579 Points -10%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	12144 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone (4761 - 21385, n=214, last 2 years)	11787 Points -16%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	10745 Points -23%

CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi 12S Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1165 Points
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432	1128 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (749 - 1178, n=21)	1033 Points -11%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288	990 Points -15%
Sony Xperia 1 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	990 Points -15%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	956 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	942 Points -19%
Average of class Smartphone (200 - 1474, n=165, last 2 years)	837 Points -28%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	749 Points -36%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432	8406 Points +19%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	7665 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (5642 - 8753, n=21)	7507 Points +6%
Sony Xperia 1 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	7277 Points +3%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	7068 Points
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	6799 Points -4%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288	6365 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	6319 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)	5759 Points -19%
System
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432	12962 Points +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (8750 - 13563, n=21)	11842 Points +18%
Sony Xperia 1 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	11338 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	10464 Points +4%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	10340 Points +3%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	10047 Points
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	9873 Points -2%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288	9696 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)	9672 Points -4%
Memory
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432	9017 Points +42%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	8906 Points +40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (3871 - 9114, n=21)	7549 Points +19%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288	7453 Points +17%
Sony Xperia 1 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	7293 Points +15%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	6523 Points +3%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	6352 Points
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)	6267 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	6212 Points -2%
Graphics
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432	26660 Points +21%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	21947 Points
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	21944 Points 0%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	21650 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (16742 - 26660, n=21)	21295 Points -3%
Sony Xperia 1 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	20093 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	17104 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)	14220 Points -35%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288	12776 Points -42%
Web
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1813 Points +2%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1783 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288	1782 Points 0%
Sony Xperia 1 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1728 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (1198 - 2006, n=21)	1713 Points -4%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432	1602 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)	1495 Points -16%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1444 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	1434 Points -20%

AImark - Score v2.x
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288	262983 Points +3431%
Average of class Smartphone (1043 - 139804, n=50, last 2 years)	21146 Points +184%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	7448 Points
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432	6805 Points -9%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	6442 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (1043 - 7865, n=11)	6385 Points -14%
Sony Xperia 1 IV Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	6273 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	6217 Points -17%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	5982 Points -20%

我们从CPU和系统基准测试中得到的积极印象在图形基准测试中得到进一步加强。小米智能手机的排名超过了 ROG Phone 6 Pro在屏幕外速率方面，小米智能手机排在ROG Phone 6 Pro之前。然而，正如预期的那样，由于分辨率较高，小米12S Ultra并没有接近游戏手机的屏幕得分。尽管使用Snapdragon 8+ Gen.1，浏览速度似乎非常快。，小米旗舰机在浏览器测试中产生平庸或低于平均水平的结果。

3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi 12S Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2899 Points
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2760 Points -5%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2523 Points -13%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2188 Points -25%
Sony Xperia 1 IV Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2038 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1916 Points -34%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1498 Points -48%
Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi 12S Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2873 Points
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2818 Points -2%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2575 Points -10%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2528 Points -12%
Sony Xperia 1 IV Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2073 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2044 Points -29%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1552 Points -46%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 12S Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11073 Points
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11024 Points 0%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10175 Points -8%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9593 Points -13%
Sony Xperia 1 IV Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7932 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7288 Points -34%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5734 Points -48%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	165 fps +39%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +1%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	118 fps -1%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	114 fps -4%
Sony Xperia 1 IV Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	90 fps -24%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -50%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 12S Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	445 fps
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	426 fps -4%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	380 fps -15%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	356 fps -20%
Sony Xperia 1 IV Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	303 fps -32%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	302 fps -32%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	281 fps -37%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	152 fps +41%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +11%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	108 fps 0%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	108 fps
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	98 fps -9%
Sony Xperia 1 IV Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	84 fps -22%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -44%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 12S Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	247 fps
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	206 fps -17%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	193 fps -22%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	187 fps -24%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	181 fps -27%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	177 fps -28%
Sony Xperia 1 IV Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	167 fps -32%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	112 fps +11%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	111 fps +10%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	101 fps
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	71 fps -30%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	62 fps -39%
Sony Xperia 1 IV Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -41%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56 fps -45%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 12S Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	189 fps
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	134 fps -29%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	127 fps -33%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps -36%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	115 fps -39%
Sony Xperia 1 IV Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	112 fps -41%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	111 fps -41%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	83 fps +5%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	79 fps
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	64 fps -19%
Sony Xperia 1 IV Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	48 fps -39%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39 fps -51%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39 fps -51%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	35 fps -56%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi 12S Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	98 fps
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	75 fps -23%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	71 fps -28%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	70 fps -29%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	68 fps -31%
Sony Xperia 1 IV Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	66 fps -33%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	63 fps -36%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	62 fps 0%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	62 fps
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	52 fps -16%
Sony Xperia 1 IV Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	51 fps -18%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	36 fps -42%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	31 fps -50%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	26 fps -58%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 12S Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	40 fps -9%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	36 fps -18%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	34 fps -23%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	30 fps -32%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	30 fps -32%
Sony Xperia 1 IV Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	29 fps -34%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 12S Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	98 fps
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	76 fps -22%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	74 fps -24%
Sony Xperia 1 IV Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	57 fps -42%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53 fps -46%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps -55%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	42 fps -57%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 12S Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	115 fps
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	97 fps -16%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	94 fps -18%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	85 fps -26%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	80 fps -30%
Sony Xperia 1 IV Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	73 fps -37%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	68 fps -41%

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro (Chrome 103)	144.7 Points +34%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)	130.189 Points +20%
Sony Xperia 1 IV (Chrome 103)	124.37 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (76.2 - 178.5, n=21)	121.1 Points +12%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra (Chrome 104)	108.34 Points
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)	106.1 Points -2%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)	103 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)	96.8 Points -11%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra (Chrome91)	94.3 Points -13%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro (Chrome 103)	128 runs/min +58%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)	118.5 runs/min +47%
Sony Xperia 1 IV (Chrome 103)	112 runs/min +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (69.1 - 167, n=16)	111.4 runs/min +38%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)	108 runs/min +34%
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)	107.1 runs/min +33%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)	104 runs/min +29%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra (Chrome91)	98 runs/min +21%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra (Chrome 104)	80.8 runs/min

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro (Chrome 103)	195 Points +37%
Sony Xperia 1 IV (Chrome 103)	161 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (106 - 224, n=14)	159.4 Points +12%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra (Chrome 104)	142 Points
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra (Chrome91)	141 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)	133.1 Points -6%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)	133 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)	124 Points -13%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)	99 Points -30%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro (Chrome 103)	53898 Points +47%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)	47182 Points +28%
Sony Xperia 1 IV (Chrome 103)	46339 Points +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (17622 - 55611, n=22)	41373 Points +13%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)	38407 Points +5%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra (Chrome 104)	36742 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)	34055 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=213, last 2 years)	33503 Points -9%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra (Chrome91)	33423 Points -9%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra (Chrome91)	1782 ms * -62%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)	1595 ms * -45%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)	1259 ms * -14%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)	1125 ms * -2%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra (Chrome 104)	1102.2 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (729 - 1707, n=20)	1047 ms * +5%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro (Chrome 103)	874.2 ms * +21%
Sony Xperia 1 IV (Chrome 103)	847.4 ms * +23%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)	813.5 ms * +26%

* ... smaller is better

小米12S Ultra在日常使用中运行非常流畅，几乎没有滞后。系统性能是一流的，应用程序的加载时间非常短。这也是由于UFS存储的快速读写率，12S Ultra的表现非常好。

	Xiaomi 12S Ultra	Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G	Oppo Find X5 Pro	Sony Xperia 1 IV	ZTE Axon 40 Ultra	Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra	Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro	Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-21%	-41%	-13%	-22%	-25%	-3%	-20%	-28%
Sequential Read 256KB	1963.45	1653 -16%	1410 -28%	1982.56 1%	1638.15 -17%	1928 -2%	1949.16 -1%	1760 ?(1004 - 2037, n=87) -10%	1508 ?(226 - 4512, n=218, last 2 years) -23%
Sequential Write 256KB	1475.43	1074 -27%	894 -39%	1262.21 -14%	1065.13 -28%	756 -49%	1454.5 -1%	1134 ?(452 - 1873, n=87) -23%	1118 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=218, last 2 years) -24%
Random Read 4KB	309.21	322.3 4%	183.7 -41%	293.95 -5%	313.35 1%	259.3 -16%	297.48 -4%	281 ?(173.5 - 543, n=87) -9%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=218, last 2 years) -20%
Random Write 4KB	489.58	273.1 -44%	210.4 -57%	334.19 -32%	273.19 -44%	329.7 -33%	459.66 -6%	311 ?(197.5 - 499, n=88) -36%	272 ?(13 - 709, n=218, last 2 years) -44%

游戏--小米12S超能管理120 fps

为了评估日常使用中的GPU能力，我们用我们的GameBench工具仔细观察了一些Android 。从纸面上看，强大的SoC和快速的120赫兹OLED显示屏带来了很多游戏乐趣。然而，高通SoC的高废热多少破坏了小米12S Ultra的潜力。

在《PUBG移动版》中，在酷炫的系统下，60帧的高清画面是可能的。一旦骁龙8+1代处于长时间的压力之下，就只能产生50帧。然后，只有在最低的图形设置下才有可能实现持续的60帧。这款旗舰机在最高细节水平（UHD）下以40帧运行。

Armajet最初以高帧率运行，但随着时间的推移稳步下降。竞技场射击游戏理论上支持面板的全部120赫兹，但12S Ultra平均只能达到72帧。

Xiaomi 12S Ultra; Armajet: Ø72.1 (51-122)

Xiaomi 12S Ultra; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.5 (57-61)

Xiaomi 12S Ultra; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø51.4 (44-61)

Xiaomi 12S Ultra; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø50 (41-60)

Xiaomi 12S Ultra; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.7 (35-41)

排放 - 小米智能手机变暖

温度

在长时间的负载下，小米12S Ultra的表面温度明显上升，机箱的一些地方变得非常热，尤其是上三分之一的地方。为了更好地评估这种情况下高通SoC的性能，我们用3DMark进行了压力测试。

Wild Life的压力测试显示了与配备了以下设备的智能手机类似的情况Snapdragon 8 Gen 1的智能手机相似，尽管性能水平更高。与OnePlus不同，小米明显地对其智能手机进行节流，以避免持续过热。我们还能够在12S Ultra中诱发系统崩溃，但在这里，单一的压力测试是不够的。

Max. Load

Idle


43 °C	42.8 °C	39.2 °C
45 °C	43.1 °C	38.9 °C
47.4 °C	43.4 °C	39.8 °C

Maximum: 47.4 °C
Average: 42.5 °C


35.9 °C	39.6 °C	37.6 °C
36.7 °C	39.8 °C	38.6 °C
36.6 °C	40.3 °C	39.6 °C

Maximum: 40.3 °C
Average: 38.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 42.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.4 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	95.2 % +77%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	92.5 % +72%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	62.7 % +17%
Sony Xperia 1 IV Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59.6 % +11%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59.6 % +11%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	58.5 % +9%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53.7 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.4 % +31%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	93.5 % +23%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	75.8 %
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	64.8 % -15%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	62.7 % -17%
Sony Xperia 1 IV Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	62.5 % -18%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	61.8 % -18%

Xiaomi 12S Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø14.3 (12.6-16.7)

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø9.2 (7.76-12.6)

Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø10.9 (9.64-15.4)

Sony Xperia 1 IV Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø10.4 (9.54-15.3)

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø10.3 (9.26-14.3)

Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; with Fan: Ø16.7 (16.6-16.7)

Xiaomi 12S Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø51.6 (33.9-63)

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø32.2 (25.9-44.2)

Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø41.7 (37.2-59.4)

Sony Xperia 1 IV Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø36.8 (31.8-53.4)

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø36.8 (31.7-53.3)

Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; without Fan: Ø61.5 (59.8-62.8)

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø32.3 (26.8-43.4)

Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø43.7 (38.1-60.9)

Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; with Fan: Ø65.7 (65.6-66.1)

发言人

这款来自小米的旗舰机在外壳的顶部和底部采用了对称的双扬声器系统。12S Ultra的对称扬声器布局产生了真正的立体声，由哈曼卡顿公司进行了优化。

这款智能手机产生了非常线性的中音和高音，尽管在超高音调中可以看到粉红噪声图的凹陷。低音是存在的，但几乎无法察觉。

小米没有包括一个音频插孔，但通过USB-C端口可以播放音乐。那些想使用无线耳机或蓝牙音箱的人可以使用AAC、aptX、aptX-HD和LDAC以及LHDC。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi 12S Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 小米12S超能版带快速充电功能

消耗功率

小米12S Ultra可以通过USB-C充电，最大功率为67瓦，或通过无线充电，最大功率为50瓦。还可以使用最大10瓦的反向无线充电。除MI FC 2.0外，还支持QC4或PD3.0等常见的快速充电协议。

小米专有的Surge G1芯片组应该能提高4840兆赫强电池的运行时间。大约46分钟，这款高端智能手机的充电速度并不像小米12S Pro那样快，但充电时间仍然合理。

骁龙8+第一代的功耗明显低于使用高通前代产品的智能手机。高通前辈，尤其是在负载下。一个更高效的低温CPU似乎是造成这种情况的主要原因。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0 / 0.1 Watt
Idle	0.9 / 1 / 1.2 Watt
Load	3.5 / 6.9 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Xiaomi 12S Ultra 4860 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G 5000 mAh	Oppo Find X5 Pro 5000 mAh	Sony Xperia 1 IV 5000 mAh	ZTE Axon 40 Ultra 5000 mAh	Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro 6000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-20%	-20%	-44%	-30%	-9%	-51%	-32%
Idle Minimum *	0.9	0.58 36%	1.24 -38%	1.06 -18%	0.88 2%	0.8 11%	1.015 ?(0.56 - 2.57, n=19) -13%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) -0%
Idle Average *	1	0.71 29%	1.39 -39%	1.71 -71%	1.57 -57%	1.31 -31%	1.869 ?(0.71 - 8.65, n=19) -87%	1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) -45%
Idle Maximum *	1.2	1.16 3%	1.42 -18%	1.89 -58%	1.6 -33%	1.36 -13%	2.02 ?(0.79 - 8.71, n=19) -68%	1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) -36%
Load Average *	3.5	7.07 -102%	3.58 -2%	4.99 -43%	5.06 -45%	3.77 -8%	5.69 ?(2.75 - 15, n=19) -63%	5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) -59%
Load Maximum *	6.9	11.32 -64%	6.99 -1%	8.91 -29%	7.91 -15%	7.04 -2%	8.55 ?(4.54 - 15, n=19) -24%	8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) -20%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi 12S Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1: Ø4.8 (0.957-9.02)

Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1: Ø5.76 (1.02-11.1)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi 12S Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.7 (8.53-8.86)

Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.2 (9.9-10.5)

Xiaomi 12S Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.992 (0.918-1.223)

Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.178 (1.119-1.31)

电池寿命

小米12S Ultra的电池运行时间让我们感到惊喜，对于所安装的硬件来说，它的运行时间非常好。我们在QHD-Plus分辨率下进行了测试，自适应刷新率最大为120赫兹。在调整显示亮度（150cd/m²）的情况下，小米旗舰机在实用的WLAN测试中表现特别好。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		29h 26min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 104)		15h 51min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		18h 32min
Load (maximum brightness)		5h 27min

	Xiaomi 12S Ultra 4860 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G 5000 mAh	Oppo Find X5 Pro 5000 mAh	Sony Xperia 1 IV 5000 mAh	ZTE Axon 40 Ultra 5000 mAh
Battery Runtime		6%	-8%	-38%	16%
Reader / Idle	1766	1973 12%	1269 -28%	979 -45%	2446 39%
H.264	1112	1078 -3%	1142 3%	637 -43%	1468 32%
WiFi v1.3	951	844 -11%	788 -17%	424 -55%	975 3%
Load	327	410 25%	367 12%	297 -9%	296 -9%

Pros

+ 高分辨率OLED面板

+ 运行时间长

+ 强大的SoC

+ 良好的扬声器

+ 高质量的印象

+ 非常好的主摄像头

Cons

- 定位不准确

- 只有USB2.0

- 前置摄像头没有UHD选项

- 高废热

- 强大的节流功能

- 测试中无法识别WiFi 6E

- 兼容性限制

对小米12S Ultra的评判

小米的Ultra机型再次将重点放在相机系统上，通过与徕卡的新合作关系得到加强，这使得索尼IMX989的巨大表现特别好，具有出色的图像质量和自然的虚化效果。然而，小米12S Ultra落后于同类设备，如Oppo Find X5 Pro由于前置摄像头缺乏UHD视频录制选项，而且超广角摄像头的质量较低。

排除这些小的批评点，人们不禁要问，为什么这家中国制造商在2022年的旗舰智能手机上选择了USB 2.0，为什么内部的120瓦快速充电技术只保留给上层人士，而没有用于高端领域。本来非常好的Super AMOLED显示屏在亮度方面也明显不如竞争的三星设备。A Galaxy S22 Ultra，例如，在我们的基准测试中，明显更亮。

小米的12S Ultra是一款高质量和装备非常好的智能手机，希望它能很快进入欧洲。为什么只有中国能够享受到真正的2022年旗舰机的好处，这是无法理解的。

与OnePlus类似，从骁龙8代。在全球小米智能手机中，从骁龙8代转向高通SoC的新Plus版本在某种程度上已经消失了。如果不对芯片组进行适当的节流，即使是小米也无法控制骁龙8+1代的废热。控制住。这样的芯片组需要一个游戏智能手机，如华硕ROG Phone 6 Pro，用风扇等积极保持表面冷却。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

小米12S Ultra可以通过进口公司购买，价格约为1000美元，如我们的贷款伙伴Trading Shenzhen。.

Xiaomi 12S Ultra - 2022-09-01 09/01/2022 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

92%

Keyboard

65 / 75 → 87%

Pointing Device

96%

Connectivity

51 / 70 → 72%

Weight

88%

Battery

91%

Display

93%

Games Performance

63 / 64 → 98%

Application Performance

84 / 86 → 98%

Temperature

87%

Noise

100%

Audio

76 / 90 → 84%

Camera

81%

Average

82%

89%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Jacob Fisher - Translator - 915 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 389263 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 小米12S Ultra评论。配备巨大徕卡相机的5G智能手机让我们感到好奇

Marcus Herbrich, 2022-09- 5 (Update: 2022-09- 5)

小米12S Ultra评论。配备巨大徕卡相机的5G智能手机让我们感到好奇

潜在的竞争对手比较

保护壳 - 小米12S Ultra素皮保护壳

尺寸比较

设备 - 带有USB2.0的小米智能手机

软件--小米智能手机与Android 12

通信与GNSS - 小米12S Ultra与快速WLAN

电话和语音质量 - 小米双卡智能手机

照相机 - 小米智能手机配备三摄像头

视频记录

配件和保修 - 小米12S Ultra带电源适配器

输入设备和操作 - 小米智能手机，240赫兹

显示器 - 小米智能手机采用OLED

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 采用高通SoC的小米12S Ultra

游戏--小米12S超能管理120 fps

排放 - 小米智能手机变暖

温度

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

发言人

Xiaomi 12S Ultra audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G audio analysis

电池寿命 - 小米12S超能版带快速充电功能

消耗功率

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

对小米12S Ultra的评判

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare