Notebookcheck Logo

小米13评测--配备徕卡相机的紧凑型动力设备

小而有力。 小米13是最紧凑的高端手机之一,拥有最新的骁龙8代和与徕卡合作开发的相机模块。阅读我们的评论,了解这种组合是否效果良好。
5G Android Touchscreen Smartphone
(图片:Daniel Schmidt/notebookcheck.com)

小米13是继去年的 小米12并保持了该系列的特点,是一款紧凑的高端智能手机。小米13的显示屏只是稍大一些。正如预期的那样,这款手机再次采用了高通公司的最新旗舰SoC--这次是 骁龙8代2.

虽然该设备与前代产品有很多相同的规格,但小米对相机设置进行了彻底改造。我们指的不仅仅是与徕卡的合作,还包括传感器。除了有一个新的主传感器,相机模块现在配备了一个光学变焦镜头,而不是一个专门的微距镜头。

我们的评论单元是来自中国的进口版本。小米13的国际版预计将在3月到来(,见我们的新闻报道 ,德语),据说价格为999欧元(1073美元)。如果你决定购买进口机型,可以从零售商那里以低于800欧元(860美元)的价格买到这款手机。

Xiaomi 13 (13 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 8 x 2 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X3 / A715 / A710 / A510 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
6.36 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 414 PPI, capacitive, 240Hz touch sampling rate, OLED, 8-bit, LTPO 4.0, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 224.5 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity, G-sensor, accelerometer, electronical compass, rotation, flicker sensor, IR blaster, OTG
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 3, 5, 8, 28a, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.98 x 152.8 x 71.5
Battery
4500 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 54 MPix (effective 50 MP, Sony IMX800, 1/1.49", 1.0 µm, 23 mm, f/1.8, HyperOIS) 12 MP (ultrawide, f/2.2) 10 MP (optical zoom, 1/3.75", 1.0 µm, 75 mm, f/2.0, OIS); 8K video, Camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (89.6°, 1.4 µm, 5P, f/2.0), 1080p video
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: On-screen, 67W charger, USB cable, SIM ejector tool, silicone case, MIUI 14, 12 Months Warranty, SAR: -; DRM Widevine L1, GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B1c, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a), QZSS (L1, L5), NavIC (L5), fanless, waterproof
Weight
189 g, Power Supply: 134 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
89.1 %
02/2023
Xiaomi 13
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740
189 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.36"2400x1080
89.3 %
05/2022
Samsung Galaxy S22
Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920
167 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"2340x1080
89.3 %
10/2022
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
198.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
89.1 %
11/2022
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7
212 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3120x1440
89.2 %
04/2022
Oppo Find X5 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
221 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3216x1440
90.3 %
01/2023
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16, A16 GPU 5-Core
206 g256 GB NVMe6.10"2556x1179

小米13在中国市场上有多种颜色可供选择:黑色、白色、蓝色(褶皱表面)和玉绿色,这是我们评测机的颜色。在中国,该公司还提供火焰红、宝石蓝、飓风黄、丛林绿和水泥灰等限量版机型。

手机的正面和背面由康宁大猩猩玻璃Victus保护,触感良好,但它们是真正的指纹磁铁。光滑的抛光铝框也是如此。该设备的结构非常好,底盘上的所有缝隙都很紧密和均匀。SIM卡槽的盖子是由与框架相同的材料制成的,并与框架形成一个整体,看起来和感觉都很干净。

从设计上看,相机模块现在与其他小米手机上的相机模块进一步区分开来,并在背面突出显示,从机身伸出相当大的2.25毫米(0.09英寸)。小米13具有IP68等级,这意味着它具有防水和防尘的功能。

(图片: Daniel Schmidt/notebookcheck.com)
(图片: Daniel Schmidt/notebookcheck.com)
(图片: Daniel Schmidt/notebookcheck.com)
(图片: Daniel Schmidt/notebookcheck.com)
(图片: Daniel Schmidt/notebookcheck.com)
(图片: Daniel Schmidt/notebookcheck.com)

尺寸比较

163.7 mm 73.9 mm 8.5 mm 221 g162.9 mm 76.6 mm 8.9 mm 212 g161.76 mm 73.5 mm 8.39 mm 198.5 g152.7 mm 69.9 mm 8.66 mm 179 g152.8 mm 71.5 mm 7.98 mm 189 g147.5 mm 71.5 mm 7.85 mm 206 g146 mm 70.6 mm 7.6 mm 167 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

规格 - 仍然只支持USB 2.0

与前代产品一样,小米13配备了一个USB-C接口,不支持通过电缆输出视频。但至少它能够进行OTG,从而使用户能够连接外部外围设备和存储设备。不幸的是,该接口只支持USB 2.0,在我们的测试中,它的传输速度只有37.7 MB/s。

这款手机也没有音频插孔或microSD插槽。作为回报,你会得到一个红外发射器,可以让你远程控制多媒体设备、空调和相机等东西。小米13也有蓝牙5.3,NFC和UWB功能(用于将设备变成数字汽车钥匙)。

在中国,这款旗舰手机有四种内存/存储配置:8/128GB、8/256GB、12/256GB和12/512GB。根据经验,国际版的选择可能会更少。

上图:麦克风、扬声器、红外辐射器、话筒(图片:Daniel Schmidt)。
顶部: 麦克风、扬声器、红外辐射器、麦克风
左侧(图片来源:Daniel Schmidt)。
左侧
右侧。音量摇杆、电源按钮(图片:Daniel Schmidt)。
右侧。音量摇杆,电源按钮
底部。扬声器、USB接口、麦克风、SIM卡插槽(图片:Daniel Schmidt)。
底部。扬声器、USB接口、麦克风、SIM卡插槽

软件 - 小米13搭载了Android 13和MIUI 14

小米13的出货量为目前的Android 13。我们从中国进口的版本预装了许多中国应用程序。我们的评测设备上缺少谷歌应用商店,但这可以在事后使用APK轻松补救。但是,如果你从TradingShenzhen(他好心借给我们评测设备)购买手机,Google Play Store将预装在设备上。

这款手机已经有基本的谷歌服务,但Android Auto在进口版本上不工作,它只支持以下系统语言。中文、藏语、维吾尔语和英语--这一点我们已经在Mix Fold 2上看到过了。 混合折叠2.在小米13上应该可以观看受DRM保护的高清内容,因为该设备有Widevine L1认证。

在这次审查时,安全补丁最后一次更新是在2022年12月1日,因此不是非常最新的。现在,小米还没有宣布该设备将获得多少年的更新。尽管小米很可能计划为该手机提供三个Android 更新和四年的安全补丁(每季度推出)。更多信息肯定会在全球发布期间公布。

连接性和全球导航卫星系统 - 在6GHz频段的卓越性能

小米13能够使用快速的Wi-Fi 6E访问本地数据网络,因此可以利用6GHz频段。与我们的参考路由器(华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000)配对,该手机不仅提供了极高的传输速度,还保持了非常稳定的连接。在5GHz频段,小米设备成功地产生了类似的巨大性能,只有在传输数据时才会放慢速度。从纸面上看,小米13目前也支持Wi-Fi 7,但我们无法测试,因为我们手头没有合适的路由器。

我们进口设备上的移动频段是为亚洲市场定制的。这在欧洲对6以下的5G不构成任何问题,因为所有必要的频段都支持。而LTE的情况则不同。缺乏对20号频段(800MHz)的支持尤其值得指出,因为它被服务提供商用于大范围的覆盖。因此,在城市地区和大城市,你可能不会注意到这一点,但在更多的农村地区以及高速公路上,这肯定会成为一个问题。

这种限制并不适用于国际版,因为根据经验,它可能会支持更广泛的移动频段。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
904 (453min - 912max) MBit/s +1%
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
894 (803min - 944max) MBit/s
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
881 (446min - 922max) MBit/s -1%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
854 (763min - 898max) MBit/s -4%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
820 (799min - 837max) MBit/s -8%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
763 (386min - 780max) MBit/s -15%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
723 (365min - 741max) MBit/s -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=210, last 2 years)
654 MBit/s -27%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
945 (917min - 968max) MBit/s +23%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
890 (433min - 934max) MBit/s +16%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
839 (531min - 913max) MBit/s +9%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
823 (418min - 852max) MBit/s +7%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
822 (409min - 835max) MBit/s +7%
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
770 (459min - 912max) MBit/s
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
757 (380min - 826max) MBit/s -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=211, last 2 years)
690 MBit/s -10%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1894 (955min - 1923max) MBit/s
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1657 (1379min - 1781max) MBit/s -13%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1645 (1586min - 1695max) MBit/s -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (229 - 1894, n=61, last 2 years)
1536 MBit/s -19%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1407 (872min - 1714max) MBit/s -26%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1751 (879min - 1776max) MBit/s +6%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1743 (1585min - 1798max) MBit/s +5%
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1656 (1620min - 1684max) MBit/s
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1522 (1278min - 1606max) MBit/s -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (598 - 1840, n=61, last 2 years)
1364 MBit/s -18%
01002003004005006007008009001000110012001300140015001600170018001900Tooltip
Xiaomi 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1862 (955-1923)
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1657 (1379-1781)
Xiaomi 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1655 (1620-1684)
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1520 (1278-1606)
Xiaomi 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø892 (803-944)
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø865 (446-922)
Xiaomi 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø755 (459-912)
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø839 (531-913)
GPS测试:在一个建筑物内
在一个建筑物内
GPS测试:户外
在户外
GPS测试:支持的GNSS
全球导航卫星系统

在我们的测试中,satfix在建筑物内不工作,而小米13需要几秒钟才能在户外工作。同样,它也需要一段时间才能将精度稳定在5米。然而,GNSS支持在理论上是堪称典范的。

我们带着手机去骑自行车,与Garmin Venu 2进行比较。在大约10公里的路线上(6.2英里),两台设备测量的距离仅相差40米(131英尺),这是一个极好的结果。也就是说,小米13追踪的详细路线显示了一些过于夸张的弯道。尽管这可能不会对导航造成任何限制,但我们希望手机的位置追踪能更准确一些。

GNSS试骑:环湖
GNSS试骑:环湖
GNSS试骑:转折点
GNSS试骑:转折点
GNSS试骑:总结
GNSS试骑:总结

电话和语音质量

小米13支持VoLTE和Wi-Fi通话等无线功能,但不提供任何内置的SIP账户管理。两个nano SIM卡插槽都支持5G。然而,该设备缺乏对eSIM的支持。与国际版的小米13不同,中国版的小米13能够进行电话录音。

小米13的语音质量给我们留下了深刻印象。当手机放在耳边时,声音传输时听起来很自然,小的背景噪音也被可靠地抑制。在免提模式下,该设备具有体面的麦克风拾音范围和相对较低的回声效果。

相机 - 与徕卡合作的三相机设置

纵向模式下的自拍 (图片: Daniel Schmidt)
纵向模式下的自拍
照片模式下的自拍 (图片: Daniel Schmidt)
照片模式下的自拍

前置摄像头与小米12的摄像头非常相似。它再次拥有高达3200万像素的分辨率,但配备了一个更宽的f/2.0光圈。前置摄像头在视频能力方面是一个倒退。它能够录制高达全高清的视频,但速度只有30帧。相比之下, 小米12能以60帧/秒的速度拍摄全高清视频。该相机在光线良好的情况下能产生令人愉快的图像质量。而且,由于传感器不使用像素分档,照片可以获得全分辨率。

小米一直在吹捧与徕卡公司联合开发的三摄像头阵列,作为该手机的亮点之一。主摄像头采用索尼IMX800传感器,有5400万像素(其中5000万像素是有效可用的),并带有徕卡Vario-Summicron 1:18-2.2/15-75 ASPH标签。你还会发现一个超宽相机和一个3.2倍光学变焦的长焦镜头。与徕卡的合作似乎不仅仅是软件,还包括镜头上的ALD涂层,旨在提高其质量。徕卡在软件中提供两种模式:鲜艳真实。前者使颜色看起来更明亮、更饱和,而后者是为了复制原始的徕卡外观,允许生动的光线和饱和的阴影。我们所有的测试照片都是在真实模式下拍摄的。

使用主相机拍摄的图像以非常高的对比度和高度的细节而引人注目。这种反差水平使照片看起来略微太暗。超广角相机有一个体面的景深,但图像在边缘处明显变得不那么清晰。黑暗区域也表现出可感知的噪音。变焦相机提供合理的图像质量,甚至在5倍变焦时也是如此。然而,轮廓在后期被非常严重地锐化,从而导致主体看起来非常不自然。

后置摄像头阵列可以录制高达60帧/秒的超高清视频或24帧/秒的8K视频。后者的选择最终是相当平均的,因为8K视频的黑暗区域有明显的噪音。

3.2倍光学变焦(图片:Daniel Schmidt)。
5倍数码变焦(图片:Daniel Schmidt)。
10倍数码变焦(图片:Daniel Schmidt)。
30倍数码变焦(图片:Daniel Schmidt)。

缩放图像(从左)。 3.2倍、5倍、10倍和30倍变焦

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light
click to load images

在受控的照明条件下,主摄像头在照片的中心位置非常详细地再现了我们的测试图表。图像在边缘处失去了一点锐度和对比度,但这种损失并不过分。

尽管有徕卡真实模式,但该相机系统与小米12的相机非常相似。 小米12在色彩再现方面非常相似。三角洲E值已得到小幅改善,但特别是绿色阴影仍然与它们在现实生活中的样子有很大偏差。

ColorChecker
10.1 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
18 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
8 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
8 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 13: 8.86 ∆E min: 3.26 - max: 18.01 ∆E
ColorChecker
30 ∆E
53.5 ∆E
40.3 ∆E
33.8 ∆E
46.7 ∆E
61.1 ∆E
51.9 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
42.6 ∆E
31.2 ∆E
63.5 ∆E
62.6 ∆E
32.6 ∆E
46.9 ∆E
36.7 ∆E
74.3 ∆E
44.3 ∆E
42.4 ∆E
88.5 ∆E
70.3 ∆E
51.5 ∆E
37 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 13: 46.49 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 88.45 ∆E

配件和保修 - 仅有12个月的保修期

小米13配备了一个带有USB-A端口的模块化67瓦电源适配器。如果你决定使用进口设备,你会收到一个与A型电插头兼容的型号。然而,借给我们设备的TradingShenzhen公司已经包括一个适当的适配器。盒子里还有一条相应的USB线(A型到C型),一个SIM卡弹出工具和一个透明的硅胶套。

不幸的是,小米只提供了12个月的保修。但你的保修权利不受影响(如适用)。

输入设备和操作 - 光学指纹扫描仪

小米13的电容式触摸屏可以识别多达十个同时发生的触摸事件,其触摸采样率高达240Hz,是前辈 的一半。但在日常使用中,你不会注意到这一点。手机对输入的反应迅速而准确,屏幕的玻璃表面特别光滑,让你的手指毫不费力地滑过。

振动马达产生了很好的触觉反馈,运行时几乎听不见。单手模式借鉴了iPhone ,效果非常好。小米还实现了许多其他手势,旨在使使用手机更容易。

内置在显示屏上的光学指纹扫描仪可用于生物识别认证。在我们的测试中,该扫描仪提供了很高的识别率,并及时解锁了小米13。除了指纹识别器,你还可以使用前置摄像头来解锁手机,尽管它不太安全。

显示屏 - 超亮的AMOLED,能够达到120Hz。

子像素结构
子像素结构
闪烁模式
闪烁模式

小米13的显示屏尺寸为6.36英寸(16.15厘米),具有全高清分辨率--相当于400PPI的像素密度。这款智能手机还支持所有现代HDR标准,包括HDR10+和Dolby Vision。然而,不那么最新的是屏幕的自适应刷新率,它只能在60、90和120Hz之间动态切换。

启用环境光传感器后,在显示全白图像时,屏幕的峰值亮度为1217cd/m²,这比前代产品(最大875cd/m²)有了大幅提升。虽然小米承诺本地峰值亮度为1900尼特,但我们在评测单元中只得到了1756cd/m²(APL18)的最高亮度。尽管如此,仍然是一个优秀的结果。如果你喜欢手动调整屏幕亮度,你将有高达506 cd/m²的亮度供你使用。

与大多数采用OLED面板的智能手机一样,小米13有闪烁的问题。在最低亮度下,显示屏以相当粗糙的162至488Hz闪烁。随着亮度的增加,波形变得更加平滑。在超过65%的亮度水平下,我们只能检测到相当于刷新率的闪烁。因此,如果你对使用脉冲波调制敏感,你应该启用直流调光选项(防闪烁模式)。一旦它被激活,我们只能在整个亮度范围内检测到相当于刷新率的闪烁。

1217
cd/m²
1208
cd/m²
1204
cd/m²
1215
cd/m²
1209
cd/m²
1195
cd/m²
1217
cd/m²
1204
cd/m²
1202
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1217 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1207.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.06 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1209 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
98.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
Xiaomi 13
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.36
Samsung Galaxy S22
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.10
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
pOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Google Pixel 7 Pro
OLED, 3120x1440, 6.70
Oppo Find X5 Pro
AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.70
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Super Retina XDR OLED, 2556x1179, 6.10
Xiaomi 12
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.28
Screen
-19%
-2%
12%
3%
-2%
-22%
Brightness middle
1209
853
-29%
1020
-16%
1022
-15%
746
-38%
1046
-13%
867
-28%
Brightness
1208
858
-29%
1020
-16%
1025
-15%
744
-38%
1049
-13%
867
-28%
Brightness Distribution
98
96
-2%
96
-2%
99
1%
97
-1%
98
0%
98
0%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.2
1.9
-58%
1
17%
0.9
25%
0.9
25%
1.2
-0%
1.7
-42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3
3.2
-7%
2.8
7%
2.1
30%
1.6
47%
3.1
-3%
4.4
-47%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.1
1.9
10%
2.1
-0%
1.1
48%
1.6
24%
1.7
19%
1.8
14%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.07 106%
2.29 96%
2.22 99%
2.23 99%
2.19 100%
2.2 100%
CCT
6504 100%
6460 101%
6502 100%
6650 98%
6499 100%
6538 99%
6762 96%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 488 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 488 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 488 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最小屏幕亮度
分钟。
25%的屏幕亮度
25%
50%的屏幕亮度
50%
75%的屏幕亮度
75%
最大屏幕亮度(手动调整)
100%

我们使用分光光度计和Calman分析软件更仔细地检查了面板的色彩再现。小米13的显示屏在 "原始 "色彩模式下最为真实,但这个选项只针对较小的sRGB色域。在这种模式下,没有任何可察觉的色彩差异。默认的 "鲜艳 "模式使颜色看起来更加饱和,并且有一个更冷的白平衡。然而,它支持更大的DCI-P3色彩空间。

灰度(色彩模式:原始;目标色域:sRGB)
灰度(色彩模式:原始;目标色域:sRGB)
颜色(颜色模式:原始;目标色域:sRGB)
颜色(颜色模式:原始;目标色域:sRGB)
色彩空间(色彩模式:原始;目标色域:sRGB)
色彩空间(色彩模式:原始;目标色域:sRGB)
饱和度(色彩模式:原始;目标色域:sRGB)
饱和度(色彩模式:原始;目标色域:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6315 ms rise
↘ 0.533 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.67 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.8355 ms rise
↘ 0.834 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

小米13在户外非常有优势,有足够的屏幕亮度可供支配,确保显示屏即使在晴天也保持高度可读性。最多,观看体验可能会被显示屏上的反光打乱。

小米13的OLED面板具有很好的可视角度。虽然从一个非常尖锐的角度看显示屏,亮度会明显下降,你可以看到显示的内容有轻微的色调。然而,这并不导致任何色彩失真。

小米13的可视角度
小米13的可视角度

性能--小米13中的Snapdragon 8 Gen 2

小米13采用了高通公司制造的最新的Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 ,在我们的评测单元中,它的两侧是8GB的LPDDR5x内存。这款高端SoC总共由四个集群组成。第一个有一个单一的Prime核心,可以在3.2GHz的频率下运行。两个性能集群分别有两个Cortex A715内核和两个Cortex A710内核(每个都能达到2.8GHz),而最后一个集群有三个Cortex A510内核,用于高效率地运行任务。

就纯粹的CPU速度而言,该设备比小米12 (Snapdragon 8 Gen 1)有了飞跃性的进步。它在Geekbench单核测试中得分高出19%,在多核测试中领先优势扩大到42%。更重要的是,该SoC甚至比骁龙8+ Gen 1 (+11%/+20%)显示出巨大的性能提升。

这款手机不仅在日常使用中表现出色,而且我们在基准测试中也找不到它的任何缺点。尽管小米13在Basemark OS II中落后于摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra ,但它在AnTuTu中以较大的优势击败了Motorala手机。

评估该手机的人工智能性能并不是一件容易的事。AIMark没有在小米13上运行。在Procyon中,该设备只比Edge 30 Ultra略快。该 像素7 ProiPhone 14 Pro在Geekbench ML中完全击败了小米。但这也可能是由于驱动优化不佳。即将发布的对搭载骁龙8代的智能手机的评测将为这个话题带来更多启示。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1878 Points +27%
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1478 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1048 - 1574, n=18)
1452 Points -2%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1328 Points -10%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1257 Points -15%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1237 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1145 Points -23%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
1048 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=219, last 2 years)
913 Points -38%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
5538 Points +9%
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
5090 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (4192 - 5243, n=18)
4945 Points -3%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4251 Points -16%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
3581 Points -30%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3488 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
3474 Points -32%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
3222 Points -37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=219, last 2 years)
2996 Points -41%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1273775 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1111522 - 1322448, n=15)
1263746 Points -1%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1073804 Points -16%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
982789 Points -23%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
965593 Points -24%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
856953 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
813746 Points -36%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
773857 Points -39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)
738503 Points -42%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
17340 Points +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (11562 - 19783, n=19)
15689 Points +11%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
14508 Points +3%
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
14094 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
14068 Points 0%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12144 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=214, last 2 years)
11787 Points -16%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
11397 Points -19%
CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1332 Points +9%
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1219 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (778 - 1356, n=17)
1154 Points -5%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1109 Points -9%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1103 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
957 Points -21%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
956 Points -22%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
886 Points -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=165, last 2 years)
837 Points -31%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (7354 - 9730, n=17)
8759 Points +7%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
8164 Points 0%
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
8153 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6991 Points -14%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
6860 Points -16%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6799 Points -17%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
6164 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)
5759 Points -29%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
Points -100%
System
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
13646 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13412 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (10786 - 15148, n=17)
13206 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
11210 Points -18%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10340 Points -24%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
10334 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)
9672 Points -29%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
9294 Points -32%
Memory
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (6601 - 10821, n=17)
9382 Points +15%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
8777 Points +7%
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
8179 Points
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
6535 Points -20%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6523 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6413 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)
6267 Points -23%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
5456 Points -33%
Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (22837 - 32334, n=17)
27673 Points +15%
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
23966 Points
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
21944 Points -8%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
19247 Points -20%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
18370 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
17269 Points -28%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
16375 Points -32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)
14220 Points -41%
Web
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1960 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1924 Points +16%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1785 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1077 - 2044, n=17)
1749 Points +6%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
1739 Points +5%
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1652 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)
1495 Points -10%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1444 Points -13%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
68880 Points +332%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
42662 Points +167%
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=150, last 2 years)
21814 Points +37%
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
15961 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (11338 - 16880, n=16)
15326 Points -4%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
14572 Points -9%
Geekbench ML
TensorFlow Lite CPU 0.5
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1043 Points +80%
Average of class Smartphone
  (215 - 1418, n=19, last 2 years)
604 Points +4%
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
579 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (547 - 608, n=3)
578 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
568 Points -2%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
319 Points -45%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
284 Points -51%
TensorFlow Lite GPU 0.5
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
2522 Points +38%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2186 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1833 - 2202, n=3)
2037 Points +11%
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1833 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (474 - 2842, n=19, last 2 years)
1780 Points -3%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1631 Points -11%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
1002 Points -45%
TensorFlow Lite NNAPI / Core ML 0.5
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
3190 Points +485%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
2164 Points +297%
Average of class Smartphone
  (344 - 3638, n=17, last 2 years)
1668 Points +206%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
619 Points +14%
Xiaomi 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
545 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (401 - 633, n=3)
526 Points -3%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
441 Points -19%

ǞǞǞ阿德雷诺740集成在SoC中,负责图形处理。该GPU的性能有点儿参差不齐。在使用OpenGL ES API的旧基准测试中,新GPU有时比 Adreno 730但这同样也可能是由驱动问题造成的。一旦使用Vulkan API,我们看到了高达34%的性能提升,小米13的性能甚至超过了当前一代的 iPhone.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3707 Points
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
3265 Points -12%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2768 Points -25%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2523 Points -32%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2418 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1855 Points -50%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1807 Points -51%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3751 Points
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
3383 Points -10%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2796 Points -25%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2586 Points -31%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2575 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1946 Points -48%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1847 Points -51%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14002 Points
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
12429 Points -11%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10982 Points -22%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10175 Points -27%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9782 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7458 Points -47%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6721 Points -52%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5857 Points +40%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4672 Points +12%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4303 Points +3%
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4177 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4000 Points -4%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3902 Points -7%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25306 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20640 Points -18%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18286 Points -28%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18090 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11893 Points -53%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10987 Points -57%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13223 Points +11%
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11914 Points
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10618 Points -11%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10005 Points -16%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8449 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8268 Points -31%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
144 fps +20%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
121 fps +1%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
462 fps +17%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
456 fps +15%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
428 fps +8%
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
395 fps
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
380 fps -4%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
302 fps -24%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
251 fps -36%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
144 fps +20%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
121 fps +1%
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
84 fps -30%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
292 fps +14%
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
257 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
237 fps -8%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
213 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
193 fps -25%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
181 fps -30%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
139 fps -46%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
121 fps +1%
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
113 fps -6%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps -53%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps -53%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
197 fps +9%
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
181 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
179 fps -1%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
164 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
123 fps -32%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
111 fps -39%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps -44%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
93 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps -4%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps -13%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -35%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -35%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps -58%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -60%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
114 fps +9%
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps -2%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78 fps -26%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps -35%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps -36%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps -40%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69 fps +5%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps +3%
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
59 fps -11%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps -23%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps -45%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps -58%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
56 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps -7%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
44 fps -21%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -29%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps -30%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps -45%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps -48%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
113 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
104 fps -8%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
93 fps -18%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66 fps -42%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -47%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps -53%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
38 fps -66%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
142 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
133 fps -6%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -16%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 fps -30%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
94 fps -34%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps -47%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps -53%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps -8%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
23 fps -8%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps -44%

Basemark GPUScore

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180Tooltip
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø38.8 (15.1-95.8)
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø46.6 (14.6-111.4)
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native; 1.0.0 : Ø19.9 (12-186.5)
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø31.3 (12.8-74.5)
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø38.7 (12.6-83.8)
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official; 1.0.0 : Ø22.3 (13.3-130.5)
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3: Ø11.4 (7.67-73.2)
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3: Ø14.1 (9.38-70.3)
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.0 : Ø7.83 (5.93-36.3)
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; Official Native; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3: Ø14 (9.28-79)
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; Official Native; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3: Ø19.4 (11.9-84)
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; Official Native; 0.9.0 : Ø6.33 (4.6-43.7)

无论是在日常使用还是在基准测试中,浏览器的速度都非常高。在这方面,这款手机没有什么可抱怨的。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16)
281.762 Points +97%
Xiaomi 13 (Chrome 108)
143.264 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (62.7 - 179.2, n=18)
128.9 Points -10%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
117.894 Points -18%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)
113.8 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)
106.1 Points -26%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
103 Points -28%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)
98.153 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)
96.4 Points -33%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16)
375 runs/min +232%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (62.9 - 199, n=14)
124 runs/min +10%
Xiaomi 13 (Chrome 108)
113 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)
111 runs/min -2%
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)
107.1 runs/min -5%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)
107 runs/min -5%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
104 runs/min -8%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)
104 runs/min -8%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
99.2 runs/min -12%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16)
202 Points +49%
Xiaomi 13 (Chrome 108)
136 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (28 - 183, n=17)
125.5 Points -8%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
101 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=160, last 2 years)
100.2 Points -26%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)
90 Points -34%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16)
74261 Points +70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (19870 - 65418, n=20)
44774 Points +3%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)
44245 Points +1%
Xiaomi 13 (Chrome 108)
43632 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)
38992 Points -11%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
38407 Points -12%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)
37279 Points -15%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
37098 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=213, last 2 years)
33503 Points -23%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)
1595 ms * -83%
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)
1566 ms * -80%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
1125 ms * -29%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
1104 ms * -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (654 - 1837, n=17)
1049 ms * -20%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)
1011.5 ms * -16%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)
930 ms * -7%
Xiaomi 13 (Chrome 108)
870.7 ms *
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16)
475.3 ms * +45%

* ... smaller is better

小米13是首批使用UFS 4.0存储的智能手机之一。特别是,这个新标准在连续读写速度方面有很大提升。

Xiaomi 13Samsung Galaxy S22Motorola Edge 30 UltraGoogle Pixel 7 ProOppo Find X5 ProXiaomi 12Average 256 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-51%
-32%
-57%
-60%
-32%
-9%
-50%
Sequential Read 256KB
3454.01
1486
-57%
1717.77
-50%
1346.78
-61%
1410
-59%
1851
-46%
Sequential Write 256KB
2722.77
993
-64%
1363.58
-50%
874.73
-68%
894
-67%
1417
-48%
2443 ?(1014 - 3346, n=19)
-10%
Random Read 4KB
393.81
273
-31%
349.08
-11%
219.01
-44%
183.7
-53%
325.2
-17%
Random Write 4KB
536.76
257.6
-52%
446.25
-17%
253.18
-53%
210.4
-61%
437.5
-18%

游戏 - 充满了游戏的力量

ǞǞǞ 阿德雷诺740在小米13中提供了强大的图形加速功能。它允许手机在最大设置下运行像《源氏冲击》这样的高要求游戏,似乎毫不费力。PUBG手机也是如此;你可以在设备上玩这个游戏,没有任何妥协。所有的帧率数据都是使用我们的合作伙伴GameBench开发的工具获得的。.

有了高刷新率、体面的双扬声器和超强的性能,你在小米13上享受游戏就没有什么障碍了。

游戏涡轮
游戏涡轮
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
玄信影响
玄信影响
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Xiaomi 13; Dead Trigger 2; 1.8.22: Ø115.8 (105-120)
Xiaomi 13; Genshin Impact; 3.4.0_12498014_12591909: Ø59.8 (50-61)
Xiaomi 13; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.4.0: Ø59.9 (57-61)
Xiaomi 13; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.4.0: Ø59.9 (56-61)
Xiaomi 13; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 2.4.0: Ø39.9 (38-41)

排放 - 伟大的热管理

温度

在我们的测试中,小米13的表面温度一直很好:即使在负载下,机箱也只在几个地方超过了30°C(86°F)的标志。

小米12在我们的压力测试中遇到过热问题,但小米13似乎已经把这个问题抛在脑后。这款手机在3DMark压力测试中表现得非常好,由于节流,性能下降略高于20%。与小米12相比,这是一个巨大的进步,其性能在压力测试过程中骤降50%。配备了更强大的 骁龙8代2小米13的性能优于 iPhone 14 Pro在很长一段时间内,小米13的性能比iPhone 14 Pro更好,产生的帧数是其前辈的两倍。

Max. Load
 30.7 °C30.4 °C30.3 °C 
 30.9 °C30.9 °C29.8 °C 
 30.8 °C30.1 °C29.7 °C 
Maximum: 30.9 °C
Average: 30.4 °C
28.5 °C29.6 °C29.8 °C
28.7 °C29.4 °C29.8 °C
28.3 °C29.7 °C29.7 °C
Maximum: 29.8 °C
Average: 29.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  25.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.5 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
82 % +4%
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
78.9 %
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67.9 % -14%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62.7 % -21%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59.6 % -24%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56.4 % -29%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi 13
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
79.1 %
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75.6 % -4%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
68 % -14%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63.1 % -20%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62.7 % -21%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 % -29%
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø20.6 (17.7-22.4)
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø22 (22-22.4)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø15 (13.7-20.2)
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø68.6 (62.7-79.5)
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø81.1 (81-81.2)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø53.3 (48.7-59.4)
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø80 (76.5-84.2)
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø83.9 (83.9-84)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø57.9 (54.7-74.4)

发言人

尽管小米13的双扬声器有杜比全景声认证,但这并不意味着它们真的能提供空间音频体验。也就是说,只要你不把音量调得太高,扬声器确实能提供相对较好的声音,并有不错的低音。

那些喜欢使用外部音频设备的人可以通过USB端口将其连接到手机上。如果你需要一个音频插孔,必须单独购买一个USB音频适配器。这款手机还具有蓝牙5.3的无线音频功能,并支持多种编解码器(SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adative、aptX TWS+、LDAC和LHDC V1-5)。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2028.834.32526.328.63125.629.94018.631.85030.236.96320.536.88019.538.210018.442.512513.642.916011.654.22001254.92501259.131510.158.440010.159.250010.567.963010.367.48001070.910009.876.2125011.377.4160011.277.2200011.478.5250011.979.6315013.985.9400014.782.550001477.9630014.676.8800013.575.31000013.372.81250013.769.21600013.968.1SPL24.891.4N0.682.7median 12median 72.8Delta1.78.537.439.52830.932.628.127.7303435.82730.123.630.322.328.317.733.916.148.712.846.813.152.71258.2959.91165.310.768.310.373.510.976.312.178.111.878.61278.811.880.511.980.712.979.113.37713.47113.575.913.669.814.869.614.166.324.689.50.677median 12.8median 711.210hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi 13Samsung Galaxy S22
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi 13 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S22 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 4,500毫安时,更有耐力

消耗功率

小米13的功耗很好。将小米手机与vivo X90 Pro+直接比较,真正展示了该设备相对于具有相同SoC的竞争对手来说是多么高效。

小米13使用与其前辈相同的充电技术,使用附带的67瓦适配器可以在50分钟内充满电。在我们的测试中,仅在半小时内就达到了80%的标准。此外,该设备支持高达50瓦的无线充电和高达10瓦的反向无线充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.12 / 0.22 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.76 / 1.1 / 1.13 Watt
Load midlight 2.99 / 6.63 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi 13
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S22
3700 mAh
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
4610 mAh
Google Pixel 7 Pro
5000 mAh
Oppo Find X5 Pro
5000 mAh
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
3200 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-35%
-18%
-19%
-28%
-5%
-57%
-41%
Idle Minimum *
0.76
0.69
9%
0.74
3%
0.78
-3%
1.24
-63%
0.56
26%
1.052 ?(0.7 - 2.37, n=18)
-38%
Idle Average *
1.1
1.19
-8%
1.84
-67%
1.61
-46%
1.39
-26%
1.37
-25%
1.49 ?(0.8 - 2.16, n=18)
-35%
Idle Maximum *
1.13
1.26
-12%
1.86
-65%
1.63
-44%
1.42
-26%
1.42
-26%
1.632 ?(1.07 - 2.2, n=18)
-44%
Load Average *
2.99
6.97
-133%
2.75
8%
3.29
-10%
3.58
-20%
3.42
-14%
6.81 ?(2.61 - 15.3, n=18)
-128%
Load Maximum *
6.63
8.85
-33%
4.54
32%
6.01
9%
6.99
-5%
5.56
16%
9.29 ?(4.57 - 17.8, n=18)
-40%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011121314151617Tooltip
Xiaomi 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.84 (0.888-13.8)
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.09 (1.072-17.3)
Vivo X90 Pro+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.3 (1.574-11.4)
Xiaomi 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.833 (0.772-1.019)
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2; active fan: Ø1.435 (1.388-1.574)
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.265 (1.221-1.341)
Vivo X90 Pro+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.193 (1.109-1.298)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Xiaomi 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.55 (6.97-8.54)
Vivo X90 Pro+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.77 (9.38-10.2)
Xiaomi 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.833 (0.772-1.019)
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2; active fan: Ø1.435 (1.388-1.574)
Nubia RedMagic 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.265 (1.221-1.341)
Vivo X90 Pro+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.193 (1.109-1.298)

电池寿命

在我们的测试中,4500毫安时的电池使小米13持续了很长时间,把其他竞争者甩在了后面。只有 iPhone 14 Pro在回放测试视频时能够持续更长时间。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
49h 43min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 109)
17h 01min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
20h 21min
Load (maximum brightness)
7h 03min
Xiaomi 13
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S22
3700 mAh
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
4610 mAh
Google Pixel 7 Pro
5000 mAh
Oppo Find X5 Pro
5000 mAh
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
3200 mAh
Xiaomi 12
4500 mAh
Battery Runtime
-28%
-17%
-35%
-25%
-9%
-19%
Reader / Idle
2983
2182
-27%
2206
-26%
1210
-59%
1269
-57%
2659
-11%
2558
-14%
H.264
1221
887
-27%
1188
-3%
1213
-1%
1142
-6%
1397
14%
890
-27%
WiFi v1.3
1021
675
-34%
872
-15%
676
-34%
788
-23%
807
-21%
760
-26%
Load
423
324
-23%
323
-24%
226
-47%
367
-13%
351
-17%
385
-9%

Pros

+ 明亮的 120 Hz 显示屏
+ 高效能卓越的电池寿命
+ 卓越的电池寿命
+ 快速充电
+ IP68 认证

Cons

- 只有USB2.0
- 不支持主要的lte频段(只有中国版)。
- 只有12个月的保修期
- 前置摄像头只能拍摄1080p视频
- 不支持eSIM卡

结论 - 紧凑的动力装置,缺点很少

小米13评论。审查单位由TradingShenzhen善意提供。
小米13评测。评测单位由以下单位友好提供。

小米13在几乎所有方面都比它的前辈有所改进,同时对高端智能手机来说仍然相对紧凑。它的一些值得强调的特点包括优化的热管理,卓越的电池寿命和升级的三摄系统的副镜头,现在终于有了光学变焦能力。

小米13是一款极好的高端智能手机,但仍然缺少一些功能。

与徕卡的合作在手机上还没有立即显现出来。与前代产品(没有徕卡品牌)相比,它几乎没有显示出任何差异,特别是在相机的色彩科学方面。在微距拍摄时,该算法有一种过分追求对比度的倾向,这当然不会适合所有人的口味。尽管前置摄像头能产生体面的图像,但在这个价格范围内,自动对焦或更好的视频性能应该是一个必然的选择。我们还希望这款手机有一个更快的USB接口,以及支持eSIM。

话虽如此,这些缺点并不影响交易。小米已经成功地创造了一个奇妙的智能手机,在日常生活中使用起来很愉快。那些关注进口版本的人应该注意到,它不支持欧洲的几个主要LTE频段,但价格明显便宜。

这款手机 Galaxy S22(和它的继任者S23),以及 像素7 Pro摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra是小米13的绝佳替代品。如果外形因素对你很重要,而且你喜欢小型手机,那么 禅风9可能值得一试。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

在写这篇评论的时候,小米13只能作为进口设备,例如从TradingShenzhen(他好心借给我们评论单元)。但你已经可以在亚马逊上找到该手机的外壳和其他配件。.

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Xiaomi 13 - 02/07/2023 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
91%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
55 / 70 → 79%
Weight
89%
Battery
92%
Display
93%
Games Performance
69 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
95 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
95%
Noise
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 84%
Camera
73%
Average
84%
89%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米13评测--配备徕卡相机的紧凑型动力设备
Daniel Schmidt, 2023-02-11 (Update: 2023-02-11)