Notebookcheck Logo

小米12 Lite 5G智能手机评测--摄像头让一切变得不同

不再那么苗条和轻巧了。 小米12 Lite采用了新的设计,将自己定位为一款中档智能手机,配备了全新改进的10800万像素主摄像头和一个升级的前置摄像头。尽管有其他方面的升级,但仍有一些取舍。在我们的评论中了解更多。
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

小米给它的Lite机型做了新的设计,更接近于它的红米子品牌,而不是它自己的12系列。然而,在机身下,没有什么变化;小米依靠的是相同的芯片组和类似的存储配置。显示屏也有相同的尺寸和分辨率,尽管现在它的刷新率比以前高。电池容量略有增加,相机设置得到了最全面的更新,总的来说,这并不代表比去年的机型有全面的改进。

这款智能手机的建议零售价约为450欧元(500美元),尽管根据过去的经验,我们可能期望看到这一价格迅速下降。

Xiaomi 12 Lite (12 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Graphics adapter
Memory
6 GB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
6.55 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 402 PPI, Capacitive, AMOLED, 240 Hz touch sampling rate, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 103.3 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity, IR-Blaster, OTG
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.29 x 159.3 x 73.7
Battery
4300 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 67W turbo charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix (f/1.9, 26 mm, 1/1.52", 0.7 µm) + 8 MPix (Ultra Wide, f/2.2, 1/4.0", 1.12 µm) + 2 MPix (Macro, f/2.4); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3; aspect ratios: 4:3, 16:9, 1:1 and 20:9; 4k video
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.45, 1/2.8", 0.8 µm, Dual LEDs)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: On-screen, 67W charger, USB cable, SIM tool, clear case, MIUI 13, 12 Months Warranty, Head-SAR: 0.597 W/kg, Body-SAR: 0.998 W/kg; GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), QZSS (L1), Galileo (E1), BeiDou (B1), fanless
Weight
173 g, Power Supply: 134 g
Price
450 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
85.6 %
09/2022
Xiaomi 12 Lite
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L
173 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.55"2400x1080
82.9 %
09/2022
Sony Xperia 10 IV
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
161 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.00"2520x1080
85.8 %
09/2022
Google Pixel 6a
Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20
178 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"2400x1080
86.4 %
12/2021
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L
158 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.55"2400x1080
86.1 %
04/2022
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15, A15 GPU 5-Core
144 g64 GB SSD4.70"1334x750
83.4 %
06/2022
Samsung Galaxy A53
Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4
189 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
小米12 Lite有三种颜色可供选择。
小米12 Lite有三种颜色可供选择。

小米12 Lite有黑色、绿色和粉色三种颜色。我们的评测单位是黑色,根据灯光的不同,有时会有轻微的蓝色闪烁。

自去年以来,这款小米智能手机在各方面都有所增长,尤其是在重量方面,比以前重了15克(0.5盎司)。这一变化不能真正归因于电池,它只增加了50毫安时;相反,相机才是最有可能的罪魁祸首,因为它现在从外壳上多伸出了2.8毫米(0.11英寸),比其前任的1.8毫米(0.04英寸)要多。尽管是塑料背壳,但该智能手机的表面处理很好,看起来质量很高,感觉很好。整个设备的缝隙既紧密又均匀,显示屏与表面积的比例(88%)看起来很好。

卡盘可以容纳两张nanoSIM卡。此外,小米12Lite通过IP53等级保护,避免了破坏性的灰尘和水。

尺寸比较

159.6 mm 74.8 mm 8.1 mm 189 g160.53 mm 75.73 mm 6.81 mm 158 g159.3 mm 73.7 mm 7.29 mm 173 g153 mm 67 mm 8.3 mm 161 g152.2 mm 71.8 mm 8.9 mm 178 g138.4 mm 67.3 mm 7.3 mm 144 g

特点 - 再见,微型SD插槽

与小米11 Lite 5G相比,最大的变化是缺乏对microSD的支持。由于存储容量大,很容易克服这个缺失的功能,尽管那些需要更多空间的人将错过拥有256GB的机型。与去年的机型不同,小米也摆脱了6GB内存的机型,至少在德国官方是如此。我们的评测单位实际上配备的内存比在国内销售的版本要少一点。

在其他方面,它与往常一样:有一个红外线发射器,用于控制家庭影院和相机等,NFC和蓝牙都是板载的。USB 2.0端口支持OTG(随身携带)和PD(电力传输),以便连接和为外围设备充电。

顶部:红外辐射器、扬声器、麦克风
顶部:红外辐射器、扬声器、麦克风
左边
左边
右边:音量摇杆,电源按钮
右边:音量摇杆,电源按钮
底部:扬声器、USB、麦克风、SIM卡
底部:扬声器、USB、麦克风、SIM卡

软件--装有Android 12和MIUI 13的小米智能手机

小米12 Lite配备了谷歌Android 12和小米自己的MIUI 13用户界面。根据各种互联网消息,这款智能手机将获得两次重大的软件升级和三年的安全补丁,但小米德国公司向我们证实,这款机型没有更新承诺。在这次审查时,最新的补丁是2022年8月1日的,这是最新的。

在我们的测试中,MIUI用户界面被证明具有非常严格的能源管理。背景中的应用程序经常被关闭或不显示通知。然而,作为一项规则,这可以在应用设置中得到改善。到目前为止,我们已经幸免于小米的常规广告。

当涉及到安装在设备上的第三方应用程序时,12 Lite没有任何保留,但这些都可以手动卸载。

通信和GPS--小米12 Lite的5G和Wi-Fi 6

对于移动互联网接入,小米12 Lite支持所有现代通信标准,包括亚6GHz 5G。这款智能手机提供了一个广泛的频率范围,所以应该可以在大多数国家顺利建立连接。

Wi-Fi模块支持带有VHT80的快速Wi-Fi 6。与我们的参考路由器--华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000一起,12 Lite实现了大部分稳定的传输速度,尽管它在接收数据时需要几秒钟的时间,然后与期望值有一些差距。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
897 (449min - 907max) MBit/s ∼100% +42%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
746 (599min - 768max) MBit/s ∼83% +18%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
690 (674min - 705max) MBit/s ∼77% +9%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
633 (204min - 699max) MBit/s ∼71%
Average of class Smartphone
  (44.3 - 1736, n=93, last 2 years)
633 MBit/s ∼71% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
345 (328min - 351max) MBit/s ∼38% -45%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
976 (863min - 1003max) MBit/s ∼100%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
946 (459min - 973max) MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
888 (869min - 906max) MBit/s ∼91% -9%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
715 (357min - 729max) MBit/s ∼73% -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (57.7 - 1710, n=94, last 2 years)
669 MBit/s ∼69% -31%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
269 (255min - 281max) MBit/s ∼28% -72%
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
845 (779min - 895max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1395, n=172, last 2 years)
490 MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
766 (339min - 805max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1348, n=173, last 2 years)
467 MBit/s ∼61%
055110165220275330385440495550605660715770825880935990Tooltip
Xiaomi 12 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642L; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø626 (204-699)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, ARM Mali-G68 MP4; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø345 (328-351)
Xiaomi 12 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642L; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø976 (863-1003)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, ARM Mali-G68 MP4; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø269 (255-281)
GPS测试:户外
户外活动
GPS测试:在室内
在室内
GPS测试:可用信号
GPS信号

小米12 Lite 5G在室外建立卫星连接的速度非常快,但在室内则要更有耐心。在室内时,精确度也不是特别高。

我们在一次短途自行车旅行中,将小米智能手机与Garmin Venu 2进行比较。估计的路线几乎相同,但在直接比较中,智能手表更准确。尽管如此,12 Lite提供了相对较好的定位特性,尽管它只支持单频GPS。有趣的是,与支持全带宽的前代产品相比,这是个退步。


GPS试驾:环湖
GPS试驾:环湖
GPS试驾:转弯的时候
GPS试驾:转弯的时候
GPS试驾:总结
GPS试驾:总结

电话和语音质量

小米12 Lite 5G的语音质量在贴着耳朵时非常好。 用户的声音非常清晰自然,较小的背景噪音也被可靠地抑制。该智能手机只有在大的环境噪音中才明显开始达到极限。扬声器有一点混响,但除此之外它的工作做得足够好。

支持VoLTE和Wi-Fi通话等功能,而且还可以管理SIP账户。

摄像机 - 带有三星HM2传感器的三摄像头

自拍(照片模式)
自拍(照片模式)
自拍(纵向模式)
自拍(纵向模式)

小米12 Lite显示屏中的前置摄像头已经升级到3200万像素,但并没有使用像素分选,尽管像素很大。用它拍摄的照片在照片模式下进行了大量的后期处理。在人像模式下,用户可以模糊背景,还可以使用美颜模式来进一步定制图像。在光线良好的情况下拍摄的自拍留下了良好的印象,在最好的情况下,视频可以以高达60 FPS的全高清记录。

后面的主摄像头现在有一个108MP的传感器(三星HM2),在我们的测试中提供了高质量的图像。尽管如此,在我们的全景拍摄中,背景中的房屋颜色看起来偏蓝,并不十分正确。尽管像素很高,但变焦也仍然相当弱;2倍以上的放大倍数的东西看起来都不是很好,尽管最大10倍的数字变焦是可能的。

全角相机没有特别高的分辨率,而且传感器相当小。这对景深有明显的负面影响,图像边缘的清晰度也明显下降。微距镜头也经历了一次降级,现在只有200万像素的分辨率。用它拍摄的照片非常不平衡,有明显的失真。

视频以超高清录制,最好的情况下可达30FPS;如果全高清足够好,也可以选择更高的刷新率60FPS。图像传感器肯定可以做得更好,但高通Spectra 570L-ISP在这里达到了它的极限。

相机选项
相机选项
更多的相机模式
更多的相机模式
微距照片
微距照片

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light
click to load images

在受控的光线条件下,小米12 Lite的摄像头显示出一些明显的色彩偏差。尤其是深绿色、深棕色、蓝色和青色的色调,不自然地明亮或过度饱和。然而,白平衡是好的。

测试图的特点是中间的显示非常清晰和详细,但在接近边缘时变得有点模糊。然而,底线是,该相机的表现非常令人尊敬。

ColorChecker
17.9 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
11 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 12 Lite: 10.81 ∆E min: 2.84 - max: 21.83 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
51.5 ∆E
38.3 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
43.9 ∆E
59.2 ∆E
51.2 ∆E
34 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
28 ∆E
61.6 ∆E
61.9 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
46.5 ∆E
33.1 ∆E
71 ∆E
40.6 ∆E
42.9 ∆E
77.9 ∆E
67.8 ∆E
50.5 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 12 Lite: 44.35 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 77.88 ∆E

附件和保修 - 包括广泛的附件

小米12 Lite 5G配备了一个透明的硅胶保护壳,SIM卡工具,模块化的67W砖,以及一条USB线(A型到C型)。

在德国,保修期为12个月,这并不影响零售商的保修。不提供可选的保险或延长保修期。

输入设备和操作 - 测量心率的指纹传感器

小米12 Lite的电容式触摸屏符合我们的期望,在我们的测试中证明是非常可靠的,输入的信息既迅速又准确地被注册。康宁大猩猩5号玻璃屏幕的表面已经贴上了屏幕保护膜,虽然不是很厚,但没有玻璃表面那样的滑翔性能。

系统导航可以使用屏幕上的按钮,或者像往常一样通过手势进行。单手模式也是可用的。光学指纹传感器不仅可用于解锁手机,还可用于测量心率,但不幸的是,这一功能有些隐藏。测量大约需要15秒,尽管它可能更精确,在我们的直接比较中,比Apple Watch Series 7的传感器快10到12拍。

显示屏 - 这款小米智能手机的120赫兹AMOLED显示屏

子像素结构
子像素结构

小米12 Lite的AMOLED显示屏与前代产品非常相似,屏幕对角线尺寸为6.55英寸(16.64厘米),不过它现在的刷新率高达120赫兹。也可以在设置中选择仅有60赫兹的模式;如果选择了更高的刷新率,系统会自行在60和120赫兹之间调制刷新率。

亮度水平与11 Lite 5G NE相当,尽管最大亮度略高,高达917 cd/m2,亮点和暗点分布均匀(APL18)。那些喜欢自己调节亮度的人有高达490cd/m2的亮度可供选择。这款小米智能手机支持目前所有的HDR标准(HLG、HDR10、HDR10+和DolbyVision),这很不错。

小米在显示屏上使用了对眼睛特别友好的直流调光工艺,频率为1,920 Hz。我们的示波器只检测到刷新率有一点闪烁,在整个亮度范围内恒定为120赫兹。我们也无法观察到任何时间上的抖动,我们通过用显微镜观察显示器并使用240 FPS慢动作视频(深灰色和全亮度)来测量。

770
cd/m²
776
cd/m²
775
cd/m²
782
cd/m²
757
cd/m²
776
cd/m²
774
cd/m²
774
cd/m²
772
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 782 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 772.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 757 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.3
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.5
98.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Xiaomi 12 Lite
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Sony Xperia 10 IV
OLED, 2520x1080, 6.00
Google Pixel 6a
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.10
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Apple iPhone SE 2022
IPS, 1334x750, 4.70
Samsung Galaxy A53
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
Screen
15%
15%
23%
-9%
-8%
Brightness middle
757
572
-24%
758
0%
797
5%
662
-13%
718
-5%
Brightness
773
580
-25%
767
-1%
800
3%
647
-16%
730
-6%
Brightness Distribution
97
96
-1%
93
-4%
97
0%
92
-5%
92
-5%
Black Level *
0.4
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.3
0.9
31%
0.9
31%
0.9
31%
1.44
-11%
1.62
-25%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.4
1.2
65%
2.5
26%
2
41%
4.74
-39%
4.21
-24%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.5
1.4
44%
1.6
36%
1.1
56%
1.7
32%
2
20%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.29 96%
2.2 100%
2.26 97%
2.179 101%
2.156 102%
CCT
6403 102%
6614 98%
6599 98%
6397 102%
6746 96%
6545 99%
Contrast
1655

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 119.7 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 119.7 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 119.7 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19657 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最小显示亮度
分钟。
25%的显示亮度
25 %
50 %的显示亮度
50 %
75%的显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

在固定的变焦水平和使用不同的亮度设置进行测量

我们用照片光谱仪和分析软件CalMAN检查了颜色的准确性。在出厂设置中,小米12 Lite 5G显示的颜色有些偏冷,但确实使用了较大的DCI-P3色彩空间。在设置中选择原始色彩方案时,实现了最自然的成像性能,但智能手机随后只利用了较小的sRGB色彩空间,这时它几乎完全覆盖了这个空间。

灰度(色彩方案。原始,色温。标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(色彩方案。原始,色温。标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
ColorChecker(色彩方案。原始,色温。标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
ColorChecker(色彩方案。原始,色温。标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(色彩方案。原始,色温。标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(色彩方案。原始,色温。标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(色彩方案。原始,色温。标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(色彩方案。原始,色温。标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.15 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5745 ms rise
↘ 0.5735 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.08 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5245 ms rise
↘ 0.5545 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36.2 ms).

小米12 Lite的屏幕在户外大多数光线条件下仍然很容易观看,环境光传感器对变化的光线条件作出快速和适当的反应。只有在真正明亮的日子里,我们才希望屏幕能有一点额外的亮度。

室外,轻度多云
户外活动
室外,轻度多云
室外,轻度多云

这款小米智能手机的可视角度相当好,只在平视角度下显示出轻微的绿松石色泽,这在日常使用中几乎看不出来。


小米12 Lite 5G的可视角度
小米12 Lite 5G的可视角度

性能--小米12 Lite踩着水前进

在性能方面,小米12 Lite继续依赖骁龙778G 5G,在我们的测试模型中,它配备了6GB的LPDDR4x内存。纳入更现代的芯片可能是由于今年在中端芯片市场的这一部分没有足够的继任者,骁龙7代的到来时间有点太长。

正如人们所期望的那样,这款小米智能手机在基准测试中提供了与前代产品相同的性能,在这个价格范围内仍有较强的竞争力。只有Apple 和谷歌在这个细分市场上使用高端芯片。

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
1741 Points ∼100% +122%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
1025 Points ∼59% +31%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
787 Points ∼45% +1%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
783 Points ∼45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (765 - 791, n=9)
779 Points ∼45% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
740 Points ∼43% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1885, n=266, last 2 years)
729 Points ∼42% -7%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
670 Points ∼38% -14%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
4788 Points ∼100% +63%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2962 Points ∼62% +1%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
2940 Points ∼61% 0%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2932 Points ∼61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (2785 - 3000, n=9)
2865 Points ∼60% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 5538, n=266, last 2 years)
2349 Points ∼49% -20%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1909 Points ∼40% -35%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1878 Points ∼39% -36%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
733484 Points ∼100% +42%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
715338 Points ∼98% +38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (111952 - 1119358, n=140, last 2 years)
582270 Points ∼79% +13%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
516991 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
509185 Points ∼69% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (438254 - 520706, n=9)
498882 Points ∼68% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
409976 Points ∼56% -21%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
386185 Points ∼53% -25%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (9330 - 13296, n=8)
11676 Points ∼100% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
11470 Points ∼98% 0%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
11461 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
10755 Points ∼92% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 19200, n=190, last 2 years)
10420 Points ∼89% -9%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
9717 Points ∼83% -15%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
6897 Points ∼59% -40%
CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
1132 Points ∼100% +72%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
865 Points ∼76% +31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (226 - 1332, n=81, last 2 years)
779 Points ∼69% +18%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
678 Points ∼60% +3%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
658 Points ∼58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (621 - 678, n=3)
652 Points ∼58% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
579 Points ∼51% -12%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
574 Points ∼51% -13%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
5950 Points ∼100% +38%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4809 Points ∼81% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1223 - 8753, n=175, last 2 years)
4586 Points ∼77% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (4079 - 5002, n=9)
4579 Points ∼77% +6%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4314 Points ∼73%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3721 Points ∼63% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3626 Points ∼61% -16%
System
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
10455 Points ∼100% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (8751 - 10816, n=9)
9629 Points ∼92% +1%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
9517 Points ∼91%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
9109 Points ∼87% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2083 - 19657, n=175, last 2 years)
8085 Points ∼77% -15%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
8043 Points ∼77% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
7157 Points ∼68% -25%
Memory
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
6592 Points ∼100% +43%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 9044, n=175, last 2 years)
5170 Points ∼78% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (3956 - 6372, n=9)
5012 Points ∼76% +9%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4957 Points ∼75% +8%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4602 Points ∼70%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4580 Points ∼69% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3855 Points ∼58% -16%
Graphics
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
14148 Points ∼100% +112%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 26660, n=175, last 2 years)
8664 Points ∼61% +30%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
6729 Points ∼48% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (6594 - 6783, n=9)
6697 Points ∼47% 0%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
6681 Points ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
5178 Points ∼37% -22%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4421 Points ∼31% -34%
Web
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
1534 Points ∼100% +30%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
1476 Points ∼96% +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (718 - 2392, n=175, last 2 years)
1410 Points ∼92% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (1184 - 1534, n=9)
1367 Points ∼89% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1210 Points ∼79% +2%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
1184 Points ∼77%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1178 Points ∼77% -1%
AImark - Score v2.x
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
  (136987 - 140376, n=6)
138766 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
138747 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
104532 Points ∼75% -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 286905, n=159, last 2 years)
53821 Points ∼39% -61%
Google Pixel 6a
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144
5967 Points ∼4% -96%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4951 Points ∼4% -96%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
4714 Points ∼3% -97%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%

小米12 Lite使用集成在骁龙芯片上的Adreno 642L进行图形加速,这属于中上水平。这里也没有什么惊喜,该GPU提供的功率明显高于Galaxy A53(ARM Mali-G68 MP4)或Xperia 10 IV(Adreno 619)中使用的GPU。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
1877 Points ∼100% +174%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1626 Points ∼87% +138%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
688 Points ∼37% +1%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
684 Points ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
621 Points ∼33% -9%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
355 Points ∼19% -48%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
2399 Points ∼100% +249%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2040 Points ∼85% +197%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
695 Points ∼29% +1%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
687 Points ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
636 Points ∼27% -7%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
361 Points ∼15% -47%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
8909 Points ∼100% +259%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7261 Points ∼82% +192%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2500 Points ∼28% +1%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2483 Points ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2275 Points ∼26% -8%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1208 Points ∼14% -51%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
8357 Points ∼100% +239%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6695 Points ∼80% +171%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2505 Points ∼30% +1%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2468 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2293 Points ∼27% -7%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1212 Points ∼15% -51%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2769 Points ∼100% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2689 Points ∼97% +5%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2557 Points ∼92% 0%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2550 Points ∼92%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points ∼0% -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5338 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5277 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3902 Points ∼73% -26%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2730 Points ∼51% -48%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points ∼0% -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4299 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4264 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3546 Points ∼82% -17%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2739 Points ∼64% -36%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points ∼0% -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4833 Points ∼100%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4277 Points ∼88% -12%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4166 Points ∼86% -14%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3510 Points ∼73% -27%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3097 Points ∼64% -36%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8957 Points ∼100% +61%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5651 Points ∼63% +1%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5577 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3982 Points ∼44% -29%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2990 Points ∼33% -46%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7205 Points ∼100% +34%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5393 Points ∼75%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5236 Points ∼73% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3746 Points ∼52% -31%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3092 Points ∼43% -43%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4529 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4525 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3446 Points ∼76% -24%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2261 Points ∼50% -50%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points ∼0% -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7238 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7138 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5172 Points ∼71% -28%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4311 Points ∼60% -40%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points ∼0% -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6389 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6326 Points ∼99%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4083 Points ∼64% -35%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4021 Points ∼63% -36%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points ∼0% -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5036 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5005 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3621 Points ∼72% -28%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2934 Points ∼58% -41%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points ∼0% -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5213 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5169 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3939 Points ∼76% -24%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2830 Points ∼54% -45%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points ∼0% -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4506 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4501 Points ∼100% 0%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3370 Points ∼75% -25%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2823 Points ∼63% -37%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points ∼0% -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9526 Points ∼100% +42%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6695 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6458 Points ∼68% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4645 Points ∼49% -31%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4256 Points ∼45% -36%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13988 Points ∼100% +87%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7608 Points ∼54% +2%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7495 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5510 Points ∼39% -26%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4552 Points ∼33% -39%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4874 Points ∼100%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4501 Points ∼92% -8%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4224 Points ∼87% -13%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3468 Points ∼71% -29%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2997 Points ∼61% -39%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
108 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
89 fps ∼82% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
81 fps ∼75% -25%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
60 fps ∼56% -44%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 fps ∼56% -44%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼56% -44%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
358 fps ∼100% +169%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
252 fps ∼70% +89%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
133 fps ∼37% 0%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
133 fps ∼37%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
95 fps ∼27% -29%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
92 fps ∼26% -31%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
69 fps ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
68 fps ∼99%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
60 fps ∼87% -12%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼87% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
56 fps ∼81% -18%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
39 fps ∼57% -43%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
187 fps ∼100% +143%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
151 fps ∼81% +96%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
79 fps ∼42% +3%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
77 fps ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
61 fps ∼33% -21%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
48 fps ∼26% -38%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
60 fps ∼100% +22%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼100% +22%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
51 fps ∼85% +4%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
49 fps ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
35 fps ∼58% -29%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
26 fps ∼43% -47%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
100 fps ∼100% +79%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
60 fps ∼60% +7%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
57 fps ∼57% +2%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
38 fps ∼38% -32%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
35 fps ∼35% -37%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
60 fps ∼100% +114%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps ∼90% +93%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps ∼48% +4%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
28 fps ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20 fps ∼33% -29%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
16 fps ∼27% -43%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
82 fps ∼100% +148%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps ∼63% +58%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps ∼40% 0%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23 fps ∼28% -30%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20 fps ∼24% -39%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
60 fps ∼100% +200%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps ∼65% +95%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps ∼33% 0%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps ∼33%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
15 fps ∼25% -25%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
11 fps ∼18% -45%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
39 fps ∼100% +179%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps ∼72% +100%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps ∼36% 0%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10 fps ∼26% -29%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8.2 fps ∼21% -41%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
60 fps ∼100% +82%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps ∼72% +30%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps ∼55% 0%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23 fps ∼38% -30%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
18 fps ∼30% -45%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
95.9 fps ∼100% +152%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps ∼60% +53%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
39 fps ∼41% +3%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
38 fps ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
26 fps ∼27% -32%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23 fps ∼24% -39%

小米12 Lite在浏览器性能方面表现非常好,在我们的比较中只向拥有更新或更强芯片的竞争对手低头,甚至在WebXPRT 4中的表现超过了Pixel 6a。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2022 (Chrome 99)
182.6 Points ∼100% +116%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)
86.2 Points ∼47% +2%
Xiaomi 12 Lite (Chrome 105)
84.417 Points ∼46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (58.8 - 86.8, n=9)
75.5 Points ∼41% -11%
Google Pixel 6a (Firefox 1ß4-2-ß)
75.261 Points ∼41% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (14.8 - 282, n=178, last 2 years)
71.9 Points ∼39% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
63.5 Points ∼35% -25%
Sony Xperia 10 IV (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
57.351 Points ∼31% -32%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone SE 2022 (Chome 99)
239 runs/min ∼100% +316%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)
90.4 runs/min ∼38% +57%
Average of class Smartphone (12.5 - 375, n=166, last 2 years)
69 runs/min ∼29% +20%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)
61.5 runs/min ∼26% +7%
Xiaomi 12 Lite (Chrome 105)
57.4 runs/min ∼24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (52.5 - 61.5, n=7)
56.4 runs/min ∼24% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chome 101)
51.24 runs/min ∼21% -11%
Sony Xperia 10 IV (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
46.2 runs/min ∼19% -20%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone SE 2022 (Chrome 99)
265 Points ∼100% +141%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)
113 Points ∼43% +3%
Xiaomi 12 Lite (Chrome 105)
110 Points ∼42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (93 - 131, n=9)
106.3 Points ∼40% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 292, n=180, last 2 years)
100.8 Points ∼38% -8%
Sony Xperia 10 IV (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
78 Points ∼29% -29%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)
77 Points ∼29% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
69 Points ∼26% -37%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall Score
Average of class Smartphone (42 - 202, n=34, last 2 years)
88.7 Points ∼100% +20%
Xiaomi 12 Lite (Chrome 105)
74 Points ∼83%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (74 - 74, n=2)
74 Points ∼83% 0%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)
72 Points ∼81% -3%
Sony Xperia 10 IV (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
59 Points ∼67% -20%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone SE 2022 (Chrome 99)
65969 Points ∼100% +149%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)
33046 Points ∼50% +25%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)
31915 Points ∼48% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (23915 - 31915, n=9)
27712 Points ∼42% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (3905 - 74261, n=190, last 2 years)
26483 Points ∼40% 0%
Xiaomi 12 Lite (Chrome 105)
26441 Points ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
24159 Points ∼37% -9%
Sony Xperia 10 IV (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
21839 Points ∼33% -17%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 12437, n=187, last 2 years)
2676 ms * ∼100% -65%
Sony Xperia 10 IV (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
1981.7 ms * ∼74% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
1920.3 ms * ∼72% -19%
Xiaomi 12 Lite (Chrome 105)
1618.2 ms * ∼60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (1323 - 1893, n=9)
1590 ms * ∼59% +2%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)
1531.6 ms * ∼57% +5%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE (Chrome 96)
1323 ms * ∼49% +18%
Apple iPhone SE 2022 (Chrome 99)
497.2 ms * ∼19% +69%

* ... smaller is better

UFS 2.2存储提供了很高的数据传输率,尽管它比前代产品要慢得多,特别是在连续写入时。

Xiaomi 12 LiteSony Xperia 10 IVGoogle Pixel 6aXiaomi 11 Lite 5G NESamsung Galaxy A53Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-14%
28%
9%
-6%
-16%
-1%
Sequential Read 256KB
943.11
521.1
-45%
1312.64
39%
944
0%
510.1
-46%
697 ?(303 - 999, n=29)
-26%
989 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=255, last 2 years)
5%
Sequential Write 256KB
486.78
497.61
2%
712.94
46%
679
39%
486.7
0%
460 ?(105.3 - 857, n=29)
-6%
539 ?(11.9 - 1776, n=255, last 2 years)
11%
Random Read 4KB
196.37
192.5
-2%
219.53
12%
208.7
6%
229.9
17%
166.4 ?(89.3 - 253, n=29)
-15%
178.3 ?(13.5 - 390, n=255, last 2 years)
-9%
Random Write 4KB
199.91
177.83
-11%
225.61
13%
178.8
-11%
210.8
5%
165.4 ?(113.8 - 213, n=29)
-17%
177.5 ?(30.3 - 503, n=256, last 2 years)
-11%

游戏 - 只有在降低图形设置的情况下才可能实现60 FPS游戏

Adreno 642L提供了良好的游戏性能,对于大多数游戏来说完全足够。当用GameBench分析时,PUBG Mobile在高清设置下实现了稳定的40 FPS。如果你想获得更多的图形细节,HDR设置仍有可行的性能,尽管大多数纹理丰富的超高清水平是不可能的。英雄联盟》的情况则不同,即使在可能的最佳设置下,它仍能提供流畅的每秒60帧,尽管它不能利用可选的90或120FPS。

除了这些限制,小米12 Lite没有提供任何批评的理由,其反应灵敏的触摸屏和立体声扬声器表现良好。

PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
英雄联盟。野生裂缝
英雄联盟。野生裂缝
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
; League of Legends: Wild Rift; 3.4.0.5930: Ø60.7 (57-61)
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.2.0: Ø59.6 (57-61)
; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.2.0: Ø39.9 (37-41)

排放 - 带有杜比全景声的双扬声器

温度

小米12 Lite的表面温度在闲置时很好,而且很低,即使在持续负载时也不会变得不舒服。手机只在正面有点发热。


在我们的压力测试中,这款手机也没有显示出任何明显的弱点,能够提供稳定的性能。

Max. Load
 35.3 °C35.3 °C32.5 °C 
 35.1 °C36 °C32.7 °C 
 35.7 °C35.4 °C32.7 °C 
Maximum: 36 °C
Average: 34.5 °C
31 °C31.9 °C33.3 °C
31.1 °C32.6 °C33.7 °C
30.4 °C32.6 °C33.6 °C
Maximum: 33.7 °C
Average: 32.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  26.2 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.6 % ∼100% 0%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.6 % ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % ∼100%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.2 % ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
79.5 % ∼80% -20%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42.9 % ∼43% -57%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi 12 Lite
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.7 % ∼100%
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % ∼100% 0%
Sony Xperia 10 IV
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
98.9 % ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
97.8 % ∼98% -2%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 64 GB SSD
61.4 % ∼62% -38%
Google Pixel 6a
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49.2 % ∼49% -51%
0510152025303540Tooltip
Xiaomi 12 Lite Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø4.12 (4.11-4.13)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø3.81 (3.75-3.84)
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø7.52 (6.17-12.6)
Xiaomi 12 Lite Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 1.0.9.1: Ø14.8 (14.7-14.8)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.7 (13.7-13.7)
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø23.7 (17.4-40.5)

发言人

小米的两个扬声器能提供质量不错的声音,只要它们不必播放得太大声。除此之外,高音很有存在感,这让声音有了浅薄的特点,而低音则太弱。

有线耳机可以连接到USB-C端口,然而这需要一个适配器。无线蓝牙可以使用所有常见的音频编解码器(SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive、aptX TWS+、LDAC、LHDC V1-4)。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs204339.22530.430.73123.230.34023.326.65036.437.46324.131.98020.341.210017.632.612515.738.316013.848.520016.248.725015.150.431512.655.340013.158.250013.166.763012.768.480014.773.4100013.474.7125012.877160012.878.6200012.879.7250013.280.9315013.779.4400013.980.4500013.178.7630013.976.8800013.374.9100001469.71250014.2631600013.658.5SPL25.689.7N0.778median 13.6median 69.7Delta0.9115338.644.538.433.728.833.434.535.837.630.128.621.323.52121.516.327.714.738.212.94514.351.21353.110.857.112.362.713.566.519.571.61578.514.177.914.97611.976.612.87615.472.616.573.216.767.517.272.31865.117.963.817.658.518.351.82886.10.962.1median 15median 65.12.111.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi 12 LiteSamsung Galaxy A53
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi 12 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy A53 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命--小米12 Lite中的4,300 mAh

消耗功率

小米12 Lite的功耗相当节俭,与它的前辈类似。特别是在中等显示亮度(150cd/m²)下进行的测量显示,尽管小米智能手机的芯片更强大,但在负载下比Galaxy A53有明显优势。

快速充电技术得到了很好的提升,现在智能手机可以以67瓦的功率进行充电。充满电只需要54分钟,16分钟后已经达到了50%,29分钟内达到85%。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.12 / 0.23 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.83 / 1.78 / 1.81 Watt
Load midlight 3.83 / 6.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi 12 Lite
4300 mAh
Sony Xperia 10 IV
5000 mAh
Google Pixel 6a
4410 mAh
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
4250 mAh
Apple iPhone SE 2022
2018 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A53
5000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
18%
-6%
-1%
-9%
-6%
-8%
-4%
Idle Minimum *
0.83
0.68
18%
0.68
18%
0.78
6%
0.6
28%
0.9
-8%
0.949 ?(0.78 - 1.2, n=8)
-14%
0.876 ?(0.12 - 2.5, n=196, last 2 years)
-6%
Idle Average *
1.78
1.69
5%
1.56
12%
1.97
-11%
0.9
49%
1.3
27%
1.825 ?(1.3 - 2.98, n=8)
-3%
1.604 ?(0.65 - 3.6, n=196, last 2 years)
10%
Idle Maximum *
1.81
1.73
4%
1.58
13%
1.99
-10%
1.5
17%
1.6
12%
2.02 ?(1.6 - 3.11, n=8)
-12%
1.807 ?(0.69 - 3.7, n=196, last 2 years)
-0%
Load Average *
3.83
2.54
34%
5.37
-40%
3.23
16%
6.5
-70%
5.7
-49%
3.83 ?(3.23 - 4.7, n=8)
-0%
4.34 ?(2.1 - 7.74, n=196, last 2 years)
-13%
Load Maximum *
6.6
4.61
30%
8.74
-32%
7.08
-7%
11
-67%
7.3
-11%
7.23 ?(6.6 - 8.1, n=8)
-10%
7.17 ?(3.56 - 11.7, n=196, last 2 years)
-9%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Xiaomi 12 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G: Ø3.74 (0.953-7.76)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280: Ø7.03 (4.38-10.4)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
Xiaomi 12 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.74 (3.48-4.11)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.55 (7.22-9.66)
Xiaomi 12 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; Idle 1min: Ø1.076 (0.91-1.275)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280; Idle 1min: Ø1.129 (0.898-1.623)

电池寿命

小米12 Lite的电池寿命并不比前代产品好,甚至还短了不少,尤其是在播放视频时;事实上,这款手机在比较领域中带来了落后。尽管如此,它提供了良好的续航能力,电池电量也足够轻松度过一天。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
26h 06min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 105)
11h 52min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 36min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 39min
Xiaomi 12 Lite
4300 mAh
Sony Xperia 10 IV
5000 mAh
Google Pixel 6a
4410 mAh
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
4250 mAh
Apple iPhone SE 2022
2018 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A53
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
85%
27%
7%
-3%
25%
Reader / Idle
1566
3760
140%
1878
20%
1648
5%
2049
31%
2431
55%
H.264
876
1578
80%
1318
50%
1215
39%
797
-9%
1146
31%
WiFi v1.3
712
1168
64%
768
8%
705
-1%
769
8%
886
24%
Load
279
429
54%
360
29%
233
-16%
164
-41%
246
-12%

Pros

+ 明亮的120-Hz-AMOLED
+ Wi-Fi 6和5G
+ 良好的主摄像头
+ 快速充电

Cons

- 仍然只有单频GPS
- 不可能扩展内存
- 不确定的更新前景

结论 - 有局限性的小规模升级

在评论中。小米12 Lite。测试设备由德国小米公司提供。
在评论中。小米12 Lite。测试设备由德国小米公司提供。

通过12 Lite,小米再次做出了一款好的中端智能手机,从其前辈中脱颖而出,特别是在视觉方面。该设备更大的重量和不那么苗条的结构不再提供我们对11 Lite 5G和11 Lite 5G NE的第一印象,尽管该手机仍然比较轻。

小米12 Lite 5G希望以其108MP的摄像头赢得我们的青睐,尽管失去了一些前辈的功能。

高分辨率的108MP相机传感器绝对是这款手机的一个亮点。此外,120赫兹显示屏的刷新率更高一些,充电速度也进一步提高。不幸的是,小米摆脱了几个功能:定位系统现在只能通过单频GPS工作,这在我们的室内测试中非常明显,而microSD插槽已经被删除。

这一类别的强大竞争对手包括三星Galaxy A53和索尼Xperia 10 IV,它们都受益于制造商明确的软件更新时间表。

价格和可用性

小米12 Lite 5G可以在制造商的网上商店找到。在德国的notebooksbilliger.de和Amazon上有更便宜的替代品。那里有更长的保修期。这款手机在美国可以买到,价格约为499.99美元。

Xiaomi 12 Lite - 09/20/2022 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
85%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
53 / 70 → 76%
Weight
90%
Battery
89%
Display
92%
Games Performance
54 / 64 → 84%
Application Performance
77 / 86 → 89%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
73 / 90 → 81%
Camera
66%
Average
79%
86%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米12 Lite 5G智能手机评测--摄像头让一切变得不同
Daniel Schmidt, 2022-09-21 (Update: 2022-09-21)