Notebookcheck Logo

摩托罗拉Edge 30 Pro智能手机评测--经济实惠的旗舰机,改进版

准备好迎接任何事情。 虽然摩托罗拉的最新旗舰机原来比预期的要贵,但它确实提供了一个快速的SoC,一个哑光的外壳,以及一个高分辨率的前置摄像头。这足以让我们仔细看看Edge 30 Pro。
Android ARM Smartphone 5G
摩托罗拉Edge 30 Pro
摩托罗拉Edge 30 Pro

Edge 20 Pro 只存在了很短的时间,然而其继任者已经准备好了。摩托罗拉的Edge 30 Pro解决了其前辈的一些问题,并配备了立体声和对无线充电的支持,以及包括智能手机的Folio在内的智能手写笔。作为回报,它不再具有潜望式变焦功能,因为据摩托罗拉称,数字变焦技术已经改进到使光学变焦过时的地步。

让我们来看看这1000美元是否符合我们的期望。

Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Edge Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
Display
6.70 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 393 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, native pen support, AMOLED, 360Hz sampling rate, Gorilla Glass 3, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 236 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: Audio via USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B25/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B42/​B43/​B48/​B66), 5G (n1/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n66/​n77/​n78) , Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.8 x 163.1 x 76
Battery
4800 mAh Lithium-Ion, 68W charging (Motorola TurboPower), 15W wireless charging (Qi), 5W reverse wireless charging
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison-AF (omnidirectional), OIS, dual LED-flash, videos @4320p/​24fps, videos @1080p/​960fps (Camera 1); 50.0MP, f/​2.2, wide angle lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, depth of field (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 60 MPix f/​2.2, videos @2160p/​60fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, Keyboard: virtual keyboard, silicone bumper, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, IP52-certified; SAR: 0.96 W/kg (head), 1.43 W/kg (body), fanless
Weight
196 g
Price
799 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
87.9 %
03/2022
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
196 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2400x1080
87.6 %
02/2022
Xiaomi 12 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
204 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.73"3200x1440
88.7 %
10/2021
Apple iPhone 13
A15, A15 GPU 4-Core
173 g128 GB NVMe6.10"2532x1170
88.8 %
02/2022
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
177 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.40"2340x1080
86.9 %
10/2021
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
SD 870, Adreno 650
185 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2400x1080

这款智能手机的后盖由磨砂玻璃制成,根据光线的水平和角度而改变颜色,这使得它具有极好的高级外观,并能成功地防止指纹。

两种可用的颜色是宇宙蓝和星尘白,前者介于深绿色和蓝色之间,后者介于灰色和白色之间。这款箱子做得很好,我们沿边缘没有明显的过渡。

后盖中间有轻微的弯曲和吱吱作响,而机箱右侧带有指纹传感器的电源按钮的配合相当平庸。一方面,我们能够非常清楚地感觉到它的边缘,另一方面,它们是圆形的,因此触感很好。

边框再次由塑料制成,在前面我们发现大猩猩玻璃3。在这里,与真正的高端设备不相上下的有限预算变得最为明显。

Edge 30 Pro的显示屏尺寸为6.7英寸,重量为196克(6.9盎司),确实是一款大型且相对沉重的智能手机。

摩托罗拉Edge 30 Pro
摩托罗拉Edge 30 Pro
摩托罗拉Edge 30 Pro
摩托罗拉Edge 30 Pro
摩托罗拉Edge 30 Pro

尺寸比较

163.6 mm 74.6 mm 8.66 mm 204 g163.1 mm 76 mm 8.8 mm 196 g163 mm 76 mm 8 mm 185 g155.7 mm 74.5 mm 7.9 mm 177 g146.7 mm 71.5 mm 7.7 mm 173 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - 内置DisplayPort

欧洲客户主要得到的是具有256GB存储空间和12GB内存的型号。其他SKU有128GB/8GB和512GB/12GB,也可在特定地区使用。

就像在 Edge 20 Pro,我们在底部发现一个USB-C端口,它与USB 3.1总线相连,支持DisplayPort 1.4。和以前一样,没有找到音频插孔,这意味着你将需要使用USB-C耳机或USB-C音频适配器。

该设备支持蓝牙5.2和NFC,这意味着该智能手机支持移动支付系统。它还配备了总共三个麦克风。

左边:没有连接
左边:没有连接
右边:带指纹识别器的电源键,音量摇杆
右边:带指纹识别器的电源键,音量摇杆
底部。SIM卡插槽,USB-C端口,麦克风扬声器
底部。SIM卡插槽,USB-C端口,麦克风扬声器
顶部: 麦克风
顶部: 麦克风

软件 - 纯粹的香草Android 12

默认情况下,该设备预装了Android 12,它支持通过不同的字体、重点颜色等进行定制。它还支持降低特定应用程序的定位精度,并配有一个隐私仪表板,以详细检查哪些应用程序被授予了哪些权限。摩托罗拉承诺提供三年的安全更新以及两个主要的Android 更新。

和以前一样,操作系统基本上没有被摩托罗拉动过,只预装了Moto和Ready For应用程序。我们发现唯一的第三方应用程序是Facebook。

该设备是经过DRM认证的,这意味着它支持高清流媒体。

将电脑连接到这款智能手机是一件轻而易举的事,你可以通过Chromecast、Miracast和USB-C将智能手机的显示屏镜像到一个更大的屏幕上。然而,摩托罗拉通过Ready For更进一步,它提供了一个定制的用户界面,支持蓝牙鼠标和键盘,以实现完整的办公电脑体验。它还允许通过智能手机进行鼠标光标移动,或访问连接的PC或智能手机本身的数据。

摩托罗拉Edge 30 Pro软件
摩托罗拉Edge 30 Pro软件
摩托罗拉Edge 30 Pro软件

通信和GNSS--由于5G和Wi-Fi 6E而面向未来

摩托罗拉Edge 30 Pro支持利用6GHz频段的最新Wi-Fi标准,称为Wi-Fi 6E,以及旧的标准,如Wi-Fi 5或Wi-Fi 4。当连接到我们的华硕GT-AXE11000参考路由器时,我们通过Wi-Fi 6E信道接收数据的传输率非常好,几乎达到1Gbps。也就是说,小米12 Pro,速度快了不少。换句话说。摩托罗拉没有将内置的Wi-Fi调制解调器利用到极致,这可能是电源效率优化的结果。

正如预期的那样,摩托罗拉Edge 30 Pro支持5G,尽管它缺乏对毫米波的支持,而且仅限于较慢的6GHz以下。它还支持各种4G频率,这意味着它应该可以在国外使用,几乎可以在全世界使用。在我们的测试中,4G连接结果是与其他高端智能手机持平或略差。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple iPhone 13
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
833 (794min - 859max) MBit/s
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
655 (597min - 675max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
731 (565min - 819max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 13
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
715 (672min - 723max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (last 2 years)
376 MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1214 (516min - 1524max) MBit/s +35%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
898 (852min - 931max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
737 (358min - 769max) MBit/s -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=209, last 2 years)
694 MBit/s -23%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1465 (1307min - 1536max) MBit/s +57%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
933 (833min - 949max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
855 (649min - 889max) MBit/s -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=208, last 2 years)
657 MBit/s -30%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
Motorola Edge 30 Pro; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø933 (833-949)
Motorola Edge 30 Pro; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø898 (852-931)
户外的GPS测试
户外的GPS测试
可用的卫星网络
可用的卫星网络

室外GPS的精确度几乎是瞬时的,而且在3米处非常好,连接的卫星数量也不错。

我们带着该设备在街区内骑车旅行,以确定其现实世界的GPS准确性,事实证明,在一些最初的小问题之后,它是非常准确的。总的来说,我们对它的GPS精确度感到满意,如果这对你来说很重要,我们可以推荐它。

GPS摩托罗拉Edge 30 Pro - 概述
GPS摩托罗拉Edge 30 Pro - 概述
GPS 摩托罗拉Edge 30 Pro - 转折点
GPS 摩托罗拉Edge 30 Pro - 转折点
GPS 摩托罗拉Edge 30 Pro - 桥梁
GPS 摩托罗拉Edge 30 Pro - 桥梁
GPS Garmin Venu 2 - 概述
GPS Garmin Venu 2 - 概述
GPS Garmin Venu 2 - 转折点
GPS Garmin Venu 2 - 转折点
GPS Garmin Venu 2 - 桥梁
GPS Garmin Venu 2 - 桥梁

电话和通话质量 - Edge 30 Pro,声音清晰

摩托罗拉没有改变默认的Android 电话应用程序,这意味着你得到了标准的干净的电话应用程序,支持收藏夹和联系人。正如预期的那样,该手机同时支持VoLTE和VoWiFi。

通过一些电话来确定通话质量,我们喜欢它的耳机和麦克风质量。耳机可以变得非常响亮,这在环境噪音大的环境中是非常好的。即使我们说话很小声,麦克风也能非常清晰地记录我们的声音。免提电话工作得非常好,没有任何问题。

照相机--一个全新的概念

前置摄像头样本照片
前置摄像头样本照片

Edge 20 Pro相比,摩托罗拉在这款新设备上的相机设置发生了重大变化。前辈的10800万像素主传感器和800万像素潜望式变焦传感器不见了,取而代之的是两个支持广角和主镜头之间无损混合变焦的5000万像素传感器。新相机还配备了OIS,这在摩托罗拉Edge 20 Pro评论。拥有144赫兹显示屏和12GB内存的经济型旗舰智能手机 摩托罗拉Edge 20 Pro上是没有的

摩托罗拉停用潜望镜变焦的理由很简单:数字变焦技术已经有了足够的改进,可以取代光学变焦。不幸的是,我们的测试结果不言而喻,我们发现10倍数字变焦产生的结果相当模糊,而5倍数字变焦则更好,总体上还可以,尽管仍远未达到真正的光学变焦。

由于直径为1/1.5英寸,相机的主传感器仍然相当大。然而,由于其较低的分辨率,它不再将9个像素合并为一个像素,而现在只限于4个。理论上,这应该导致感光度的降低,幸运的是我们无法证明这一点。在正常的照明条件下,摩托罗拉Edge 30 Pro的摄像头能拍出很好的照片,对焦清晰,色彩鲜明。

毫无疑问,5000万像素的广角摄像头是智能手机中很少见的亮点。由于其四像素技术,其有效分辨率通常仅限于12MP,但它也支持全分辨率的50MP模式。尽管其分辨率较高,但它未能产生明显优于其他高端智能手机拍摄的广角照片的图像。奖励点:广角相机支持高质量的微距模式。

视频以8K或4K录制,60FPS只限于FHD,HDR-10+只适用于4K/30FPS模式。广角摄像头以30FPS的FHD模式记录,但在拍摄时支持放大和缩小。不幸的是,在拍摄时第一次切换到广角摄像头时,会产生一个单一的黑框。总体视频质量不错,灯光调整流畅,没有明显的自动对焦脉动。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera PflanzeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low LightWeitwinkelkamera
click to load images
宏观照片
宏观照片
1x变焦
1x变焦
5倍数码变焦
5倍数码变焦
10倍数码变焦
10倍数码变焦

在我们的实验室里,在受控和正常化的条件下,主相机的聚焦结果是平均的,对比度可以更高。因此,一些区域变成了灰色而不是黑色。在只有1勒克斯的光线下,我们仍然设法找出大量的细节,但不得不承认,摩托罗拉Edge 30 Pro的相机系统无法跟上最好的。

ColorChecker
18.8 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
22 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
9 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
6 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Edge 30 Pro: 10.44 ∆E min: 2.31 - max: 22.05 ∆E
ColorChecker
25.7 ∆E
39.5 ∆E
32.7 ∆E
33.6 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
49.8 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
29.7 ∆E
29.7 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
51.1 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
39.2 ∆E
26.8 ∆E
44.8 ∆E
32.2 ∆E
38.7 ∆E
38.9 ∆E
42 ∆E
40.6 ∆E
32.3 ∆E
22.4 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Edge 30 Pro: 34.93 ∆E min: 12.89 - max: 51.1 ∆E

配件和保修 - 对讲机和手写笔支持

在盒子里,我们发现了一个充电器,一条USB-C电缆,一个SIM卡工具,以及一个硅胶缓冲器。在部分地区还包括一个USB-C耳机。

专为Edge 30 Pro设计的Folio和手写笔不会在所有国家提供,欧洲客户有望在3月中旬左右开始看到这些。不幸的是,我们还没能买到这两样东西,而且摩托罗拉也无法向我们提供价格。根据产品图片,我们可以说Folio为显示屏留下了一个窄条,在横向模式下可以作为一个内置支架使用。手写笔可以存放在外壳的背面。

欧洲客户可以享受到24个月的完整 保修他们的设备可以再延长12个月,Moto Care,价格约为50欧元,还有100欧元(12个月)或115欧元(24个月)的事故保护。

摩托罗拉Edge 30专业版,带护套和手写笔
摩托罗拉Edge 30专业版,带护套和手写笔
摩托罗拉Edge 30专业版,带护套和手写笔

输入设备和处理 - 快速和精确

由于该设备的144赫兹显示屏和360赫兹的触摸采样率,屏幕非常光滑,反应非常灵敏,而且非常准确。整体系统性能非常快,带来了流畅的用户体验。

指纹识别器被集成到右侧的电源按钮中。因此,右撇子将主要使用拇指进行解锁,左撇子则使用食指。事实证明,该传感器非常准确和快速,即使在待机状态下也能几乎即时解锁手机。还提供了可选的面部识别功能。它工作得很可靠,但由于其在软件而非硬件上的实施,远不如Apple的FaceID技术安全。

纵向模式下的键盘
纵向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘

显示屏 - 不错,但不够亮

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

显示屏的FHD+分辨率可能不是破纪录的高,但却是同类产品的标准,对于一个6.7英寸的显示屏来说当然足够高。因此,我们必须非常努力地看,才能注意到单个像素或任何形式的混叠。如果你想要一个更高的分辨率,小米12 Pro可能值得仔细看看。

Edge 30 Pro的AMOLED显示屏支持HDR 10+,最大亮度为658尼特。如果有必要,其他智能手机的亮度要比这个高得多。由于面板可以关闭单个像素,其黑色水平是绝对的零,导致无限高的对比度。

642
cd/m²
649
cd/m²
658
cd/m²
651
cd/m²
649
cd/m²
642
cd/m²
652
cd/m²
651
cd/m²
650
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 658 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 649.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.97 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 649 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.18 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
94% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.236
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.70
Xiaomi 12 Pro
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.73
Apple iPhone 13
OLED, 2532x1170, 6.10
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2340x1080, 6.40
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.70
Screen
5%
23%
-16%
-13%
Brightness middle
649
959
48%
831
28%
758
17%
666
3%
Brightness
649
977
51%
830
28%
758
17%
644
-1%
Brightness Distribution
98
96
-2%
98
0%
99
1%
93
-5%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.18
1.1
7%
0.77
35%
1.5
-27%
1.4
-19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.07
3.1
-50%
1.52
27%
3.1
-50%
2.65
-28%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.5
1.9
-27%
1.2
20%
2.3
-53%
1.9
-27%
Gamma
2.236 98%
2.22 99%
2.209 100%
2.06 107%
2.209 100%
CCT
2538 256%
6498 100%
6501 100%
6378 102%
6646 98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 221.2 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 221.2 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 221.2 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17933 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

在显示器设置为 "自然 "的情况下,我们发现颜色非常准确,没有任何一种颜色跳脱,灰度水平也非常准确。我们使用CalMAN分光光度计的结果表明,AdobeRGB和DCI-P3的覆盖率为70%。

作为典型的AMOLED显示器,我们发现了PWM的闪烁。好消息是,在一致的60赫兹下,它在75%的频率下趋于平缓,许多人认为这更令人愉快。

CalMAN颜色精度(显示模式:自然)。
CalMAN颜色精度(显示模式:自然)。
卡尔曼灰度(显示模式:自然)。
卡尔曼灰度(显示模式:自然)。
卡尔曼sRGB色彩空间
卡尔曼sRGB色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3色彩空间
卡尔曼饱和度
卡尔曼饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4 ms rise
↘ 9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms).


亮度为0%时的PWM闪烁,在221.2Hz左右震荡
亮度为0%时的PWM闪烁,在221.2Hz左右震荡
0%的亮度
0%的亮度
25%的亮度
25%的亮度
50%的亮度
50%的亮度
75%的亮度
75%的亮度
100%的亮度
100%的亮度

尽管我们希望有更高的最大亮度,以提高在明亮的阳光下的可读性,但户外使用性总体来说还是不错的。可视角度符合预期。

视角
视角
户外活动
户外活动

性能--图形处理能力超强

高通公司的Snapdragon 8 Gen.1,配有8个核心,运行频率高达3GHz。而且,虽然它不能跟上Apple A15 Bionic Processor - Benchmarks and SpecsApple A15,但对于一款Android 智能手机来说,Edge 30 Pro的表现非常好,它应该可以轻松处理高要求的应用程序。

考虑到该设备内置的Ready For桌面模式,在大屏幕上同时运行多个应用程序,手机可以作为一个完整的办公电脑替代品,这一点尤其重要。

在图形性能方面,Edge 30 Pro甚至能够在一些基准测试中胜过iPhone 13。因此,它应该为视觉要求高的应用提供大量的动力。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
1755 Points +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1181 - 1298, n=21)
1231 Points +3%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1195 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1192 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
1092 Points -9%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
974 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=215, last 2 years)
915 Points -23%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
4820 Points +32%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3738 Points +2%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3659 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (3269 - 3839, n=21)
3548 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
3204 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=215, last 2 years)
2998 Points -18%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
2986 Points -18%
Vulkan Score
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6965 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (5157 - 8462, n=16)
6389 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
4407 Points -37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (79 - 9992, n=86, last 2 years)
4246 Points -39%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
3159 Points -55%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
Points -100%
OpenCL Score
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6291 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (5820 - 6291, n=16)
5985 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
4748 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (434 - 10711, n=78, last 2 years)
4051 Points -36%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
3482 Points -45%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
Points -100%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
14107 Points +4%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13611 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (10140 - 17025, n=21)
13216 Points -3%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13131 Points -4%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
11986 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=210, last 2 years)
11754 Points -14%
3DMark
Wild Life Score
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
9927 Points +56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (6351 - 10062, n=14)
9091 Points +43%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
8788 Points +38%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6351 Points
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
5683 Points -11%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
4274 Points -33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (395 - 9839, n=132, last 2 years)
2577 Points -59%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10384 Points +60%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
9979 Points +54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (6483 - 10412, n=20)
9608 Points +48%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6483 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (394 - 20068, n=199, last 2 years)
6284 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
5872 Points -9%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
4233 Points -35%
Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2609 Points +60%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
2470 Points +52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1629 - 2639, n=20)
2470 Points +52%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 5226, n=204, last 2 years)
1686 Points +3%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1629 Points
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
1500 Points -8%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
1243 Points -24%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2513 Points +60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1567 - 2585, n=21)
2386 Points +52%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
2313 Points +48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (110 - 5248, n=199, last 2 years)
1695 Points +8%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1567 Points
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
1223 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
974 Points -38%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
142 fps +19%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
121 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
119 fps 0%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
119 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (60 - 121, n=16)
99.8 fps -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 165, n=181, last 2 years)
84.4 fps -29%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
60.1 fps -49%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
425 fps +39%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
416.3 fps +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (245 - 450, n=17)
361 fps +18%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
306 fps
Average of class Smartphone
  (19 - 791, n=181, last 2 years)
248 fps -19%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
223 fps -27%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
178 fps -42%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
119 fps
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
117 fps -2%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
116 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
103 fps -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (60 - 121, n=16)
89.4 fps -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.8 - 165, n=183, last 2 years)
72.1 fps -39%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
60.2 fps -49%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
251 fps +59%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
217.4 fps +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (141 - 265, n=17)
190 fps +20%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
158 fps
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.2 - 363, n=183, last 2 years)
141 fps -11%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
132 fps -16%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
109 fps -31%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
109 fps
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
87 fps -20%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
80 fps -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (50 - 121, n=16)
77.9 fps -29%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
73 fps -33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 158, n=183, last 2 years)
60.9 fps -44%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
60.1 fps -45%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
169 fps +42%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
138.6 fps +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (95 - 175, n=17)
130.5 fps +10%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
119 fps
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.2 - 279, n=183, last 2 years)
99.3 fps -17%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
91 fps -24%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
75 fps -37%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
68 fps
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
58.5 fps -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (28 - 81, n=16)
51 fps -25%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
50 fps -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 117, n=183, last 2 years)
43.4 fps -36%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
42 fps -38%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
36 fps -47%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
96.6 fps +12%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
86 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (50 - 98, n=17)
74.6 fps -13%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
71 fps -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.9 - 166, n=183, last 2 years)
60 fps -30%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
58 fps -33%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
45 fps -48%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
98 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (38 - 98, n=20)
59.6 fps -39%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
51 fps -48%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
49 fps -50%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
44 fps -55%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=222, last 2 years)
44 fps -55%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
112.9 fps +12%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
101 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (60 - 131, n=22)
95.6 fps -5%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
92 fps -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 229, n=222, last 2 years)
64.8 fps -36%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
57 fps -44%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
54 fps -47%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
60 fps
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
54.9 fps -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (27 - 69, n=20)
45.3 fps -24%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
42 fps -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.8 - 105, n=222, last 2 years)
32.7 fps -45%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
31 fps -48%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
27 fps -55%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
42 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (19 - 49, n=22)
37.6 fps -10%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
37.2 fps -11%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
34 fps -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 94, n=222, last 2 years)
25.8 fps -39%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
25 fps -40%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
22 fps -48%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
970465 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
962824 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (692924 - 1041980, n=18)
928953 Points -4%
Apple iPhone 13
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 4-Core, 4096
813876 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
743221 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=152, last 2 years)
739951 Points -24%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
692521 Points -29%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7070 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (6007 - 7665, n=15)
6951 Points -2%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
6031 Points -15%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6007 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
5839 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=164, last 2 years)
5753 Points -19%
System
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10739 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (9273 - 11338, n=15)
10312 Points -4%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10006 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=164, last 2 years)
9684 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
9119 Points -15%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
8976 Points -16%
Memory
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
7457 Points +1%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7357 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (5125 - 8906, n=15)
6787 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=164, last 2 years)
6262 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
6248 Points -15%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
5125 Points -30%
Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (15216 - 22308, n=15)
20338 Points +19%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
17159 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
15216 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=164, last 2 years)
14144 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
13588 Points -21%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
12245 Points -29%
Web
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1843 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1669 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1291 - 1888, n=15)
1659 Points -10%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288
1654 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144
1501 Points -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=164, last 2 years)
1495 Points -19%

这款智能手机的网页浏览性能非常快,Edge 30 Pro成功地以相当大的幅度超过了其竞争对手。虽然如此,它仍然无法跟上Apple'siPhone 13

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)
180 Points +48%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99)
121.6 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (72.8 - 134.6, n=16)
107.9 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=171, last 2 years)
105.8 Points -13%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro (Chrome 94)
93.7 Points -23%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
84.1 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Chrome 96)
63.9 Points -47%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)
399.8 Points +69%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99)
236.6 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (121.9 - 237, n=11)
195.6 Points -17%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro (Chrome 94)
170.6 Points -28%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
147.5 Points -38%
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)
104.3 Points -56%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Chrome 96)
77 Points -67%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)
244 runs/min +89%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chome 99)
129 runs/min
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=156, last 2 years)
107.2 runs/min -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (64.4 - 129.3, n=16)
104 runs/min -19%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
73.5 runs/min -43%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro (Chrome 94)
71.9 runs/min -44%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Chrome 96)
46.92 runs/min -64%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)
219 Points +31%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99)
167 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (79 - 193, n=15)
142.9 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Chrome 96)
136 Points -19%
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=121, last 2 years)
133 Points -20%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro (Chrome 94)
127 Points -24%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
119 Points -29%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)
62664 Points +24%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99)
50626 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (27730 - 50626, n=17)
42391 Points -16%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro (Chrome 94)
39985 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=209, last 2 years)
33561 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Chrome 96)
31070 Points -39%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
29750 Points -41%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=171, last 2 years)
1602 ms * -96%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Chrome 96)
1417 ms * -73%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
1330 ms * -62%
Motorola Edge 20 Pro (Chrome 94)
1176 ms * -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (814 - 1440, n=16)
1010 ms * -23%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99)
819 ms *
Apple iPhone 13 (Safari 15)
413.6 ms * +49%

* ... smaller is better

正如我们对一款真正的旗舰手机所期望的那样,Edge 30 Pro配备了速度惊人的UFS 3.1存储系统,非常好地超越了所有的竞争对手。它在其已经非常快的前辈的基础上进一步改进。

Motorola Edge 30 ProXiaomi 12 ProSamsung Galaxy S21 FE 5GMotorola Edge 20 ProAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
20%
-22%
-24%
-0%
-10%
Sequential Read 256KB
1832
1620
-12%
1639
-11%
1699
-7%
Sequential Write 256KB
1028
1465
43%
760
-26%
723
-30%
Random Read 4KB
277.7
324.9
17%
245.1
-12%
245.7
-12%
Random Write 4KB
339.5
448.9
32%
211.2
-38%
179.6
-47%

游戏 - 高FPS游戏的可能性

传统上,出于对电池寿命的考虑,智能手机倾向于限制手机游戏中的帧率。FPS越高,电池消耗越大,这可能会让没有经验的用户感到惊讶和失望。想象一下,当我们发现摩托罗拉选择支持高FPS游戏时,我们的一些GameBench基准测试,例如竞技场射击游戏Armajet,返回的FPS超过100。

和它的前辈一样,Edge 30 Pro在PUBG Mobile的高设置下获得了60 FPS的成绩。最终能够通过享受高FPS游戏来利用高频显示,这是多么令人高兴的事情。

PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
氩氦刀
氩氦刀
0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Motorola Edge 30 Pro; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø103 (78-119)
Motorola Edge 30 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 1.8.0: Ø59.7 (57-61)
Motorola Edge 30 Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.8.0: Ø59.6 (56-61)

排放 - 负载下的大规模节流

温度

在负载下,设备升温到44℃。这虽然是明显的温度,但并不令人不快或严重。然而,当暴露在更高的环境温度下,它可能会变得不舒服。

此外,该设备发现有必要在持续负载下进行热节流。在我们的3DMark Wild Life压力测试的20次循环之后,我们发现Edge 30 Pro实现了其初始性能的60%。当许多其他高端智能手机遭受类似的命运时,Edge 20 Pro,设法在长时间的持续负载中保持稳定的性能,没有出汗。

Max. Load
 43.3 °C41.5 °C38.1 °C 
 44 °C41 °C38.1 °C 
 43.4 °C39.8 °C37.5 °C 
Maximum: 44 °C
Average: 40.7 °C
35.8 °C38.1 °C41 °C
37.2 °C38.4 °C41.3 °C
36.3 °C38.1 °C40.2 °C
Maximum: 41.3 °C
Average: 38.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  43.2 °C | Room Temperature 20.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.4 (25.7min) % +73%
Apple iPhone 13
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
80.1 (44.5min) % +40%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58.6 (20min) % +2%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57.4 (34.3min) %
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47.2 (27.4min) % -18%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.8 (7.49min) % +67%
Apple iPhone 13
A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
77 (12.3min) % +29%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59.6 (9.21min) %
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56.1 (5.09min) % -6%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
% -100%
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø10.9 (9.21-15.5)
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.1 (12.3-16)
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø5.44 (5.09-9.07)
Motorola Edge 20 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø7.5 (7.49-7.5)
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø38.6 (34.3-59.7)
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø37.8 (27.4-58)
Apple iPhone 13 A15 GPU 4-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø47 (44.5-55.5)
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø22.6 (20-34.1)
Motorola Edge 20 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø25.8 (25.7-25.9)
热图前沿
热图前沿
热图后部
热图后部

演讲者

与去年的Edge 20 Pro不同的是,我们的评测设备支持立体声,而这是一个怎样的声音场景啊!平衡良好的扬声器发出非常响亮的声音,提供非常体面的中低频,整个设备回荡着厚重的低音。平衡良好的扬声器非常响亮,并提供非常体面的低中音,整个设备回荡着沉重的低音。显然,没有一个智能手机可以取代带有专用低音炮的音响系统,但对于一个智能手机来说,它的声音出奇地好。

外部音频设备必须通过USB-C或蓝牙连接,以获得额外的动力,该设备支持目前所有的aptX编解码器,以及LDAC和LHDC。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2049.350.82543.943.63137.134.34037.941.75043.842.26331.834802829.510027.93612523.543.616023.850.420019.653.3250195731517.561.440015.266.850016.874.36302172.980022.372.9100018.778.5125017.379.6160015.880.5200015.878.9250017.481.4315018.481.3400020.278.3500020.377.6630020.175.8800021.467.61000021.869.61250021.365.31600021.867.2SPL31.690.3N1.682.4median 20.1median 72.9Delta2.38.629.53633.138.427.42931.331.630.33029.625.824.121.520.718.717.629.514.843.512.348.912.850.310.455.1958.411.361.914.465.117.171.31474.110.472.69.471.410.663.411.466.213.668.413.766.715.371.115.473.416.675.817.669.117.368.917.661.126.382.80.755.1median 14median 66.23.19.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Edge 30 ProMotorola Edge 20 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Edge 30 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Motorola Edge 20 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 请再给我一些?

消耗功率

Edge 30 Pro并不省电,在我们的功耗测试中,它最大消耗了10.4瓦,在运行GFXBench或Geekbench时,峰值甚至更高。它在空闲时也不是最高效的设备。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.3 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.2 / 1.6 / 2.5 Watt
Load midlight 5.2 / 10.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
4800 mAh
Xiaomi 12 Pro
4600 mAh
Apple iPhone 13
3240 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
4500 mAh
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
4500 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
20%
35%
13%
39%
-2%
16%
Idle Minimum *
1.2
0.94
22%
0.6
50%
1.01
16%
0.7
42%
1.255 ?(0.7 - 3.18, n=15)
-5%
Idle Average *
1.6
1.24
22%
1
37%
1.5
6%
0.9
44%
2.02 ?(1.04 - 4.38, n=15)
-26%
Idle Maximum *
2.5
1.34
46%
1.3
48%
1.6
36%
1.2
52%
Load Average *
5.2
5.7
-10%
4.5
13%
5.54
-7%
4.6
12%
Load Maximum *
10.4
8.12
22%
7.8
25%
9.16
12%
5.5
47%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112Tooltip
Motorola Edge 30 Pro: Ø7.11 (1.702-12.6)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112Tooltip
Motorola Edge 30 Pro; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.5 (10.4-12.5)
Motorola Edge 30 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.619 (1.378-2.67)

电池寿命

电池比 Edge 20 Pro"的电池大300毫安时,导致整体电池寿命提高,终于达到了这个级别可以接受的水平。在我们的Wi-Fi测试中,它在浏览网页时持续了13:36小时,如果有固定的60赫兹刷新率以及额外的省电模式,这个结果还可以进一步提高。它在负载下的表现也非常好,考虑到其非常快的热节流趋势,这并不令人惊讶。

电源的额定功率为68瓦,根据摩托罗拉的说法,该设备可以在15分钟内充电到50%,我们在进行了自己的测试后能够证明这一点。从接近空电到充满需要不到一个小时。Edge 20 Pro现在还支持高达15W的Qi无线充电,以及高达5W的反向无线充电。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
33h 05min
WiFi Websurfing
13h 36min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 46min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 06min
Motorola Edge 30 Pro
4800 mAh
Xiaomi 12 Pro
4600 mAh
Apple iPhone 13
3240 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G
4500 mAh
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
4500 mAh
Battery Runtime
-4%
21%
-9%
-7%
Reader / Idle
1985
2036
3%
2734
38%
1430
-28%
1689
-15%
H.264
1006
788
-22%
1224
22%
934
-7%
1289
28%
WiFi v1.3
816
766
-6%
1019
25%
594
-27%
774
-5%
Load
306
337
10%
299
-2%
388
27%
195
-36%

Pros

+ 纯粹的香草Android 12
+ 承诺提供长期的更新支持
+ 好看的哑光外壳
+ 多用途,得益于 "Ready For"。
+ 准确的定位服务
+ 快速的Wi-Fi
+ 由于支持广泛的4G频率,成为世界手机
+ 良好的通话质量
+ 良好的扬声器
+ 支持手写笔

Cons

- 有限的视频录制能力
- 数字变焦质量差
- 显示屏可以更亮
- 在持续的负载下有大量的热节流现象
- 塑料框架

评语--各种改进和全新的相机阵列

在审查中。摩托罗拉Edge 30 Pro。评测单位由摩托罗拉德国提供。
在审查中。摩托罗拉Edge 30 Pro。评测单位由摩托罗拉德国提供。

夸奖!摩托罗拉设法解决了我们在Edge 20 Pro上遇到的几乎所有问题。而且还有更多!更多的性能,持久的更新,纯粹的香草Android 12,好看的外壳,快速的Wi-Fi 6E,广泛的LTE和5G频率支持,伟大的立体声扬声器,以及准确的定位服务。

虽然我们承认非常喜欢摩托罗拉Edge 30 Pro,但它绝不是完美的。它的热量排放比以前高,导致在持续负载下出现前所未有的热节流。此外,我们本以为一个1000美元的智能手机会有更多的东西,而不是一个简单的塑料框架。

新的相机阵列比以前引入了一个新概念。前代产品的特点是具有光学变焦的低分辨率潜望镜相机,而Edge 30 Pro则配备了具有微距模式的高分辨率广角和相当值得怀疑的10倍数码变焦。这与录制视频的许多限制相结合,根本不符合真正的高端智能手机的要求。

摩托罗拉的Edge 30 Pro是一款明显改进的高端智能手机,它的摄像头阵列很有趣,但考虑得不太周全。

尽管如此,摩托罗拉Edge 30 Pro是一款伟大的高端智能手机,其价格可以接受,能够提供大量的优点、出色的性能和出色的扬声器,它肯定会找到许多粉丝。

价格和可用性

与上一代产品一样,摩托罗拉不在北美地区销售Edge 30 Pro。国际无锁GSM-only版本可在Amazon起价约为1,000美元。

Motorola Edge 30 Pro - 08/30/2022 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
87%
Keyboard
68 / 75 → 90%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
52 / 70 → 74%
Weight
88%
Battery
90%
Display
93%
Games Performance
63 / 64 → 99%
Application Performance
86 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
84%
Noise
100%
Audio
80 / 90 → 89%
Camera
74%
Average
82%
88%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 摩托罗拉Edge 30 Pro智能手机评测--经济实惠的旗舰机,改进版
Florian Schmitt, 2022-03-16 (Update: 2022-03-16)