Notebookcheck Logo

vivo X100 Pro 评测--配备蔡司相机的高端智能手机令人印象深刻

没有小芯。 vivo X100 Pro 希望凭借其众多高端规格、防水外壳、大容量电池、明亮的 LTPO 显示屏和一流的摄像头在测试中得分。阅读测试，看看它是否成功，是否存在缺点。
5G Android Touchscreen Smartphone

vivo X100 Pro 是继 X90 Pro在多个方面进行了改进。不出所料，新的 SoC 芯片确保了更好的性能，显示屏更亮了，相机设置也有了显著的改进，vivo 智能手机可以依靠更大的能量储备。

最重要的是，它不再需要进口，因为在欧盟范围内也能买到。我们的测试解释了全球版本和进口版本之间的差异，以及为什么 X100 Pro 是一个强有力的替代品。

Vivo X100 Pro (X100 Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 8 x 2 - 3.3 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720, dedicated V3-ISP
Graphics adapter
ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12
Memory
16 GB 
, or 16GB
Display
6.78 inch 20:9, 2800 x 1260 pixel 453 PPI, Capacitive, AMOLED, Schott Xensation up Glass, LTPO 1 - 120 Hz, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 256GB / 512GB / 1TB, 491 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum, OTG, IR-Blaster
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, GSM, CDMA, UMTS, LTE, 5G, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.05 x 164.05 x 75.28
Battery
21.01 Wh, 2700 mAh Lithium-Ion, 7.78 V
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, 23mm) + 50MP (4.3x optical zoom, f/2.5, 100mm) + 50MP (f/2.0, 15mm)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.0
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: OnScreen, Funtouch OS 14, 36 Months Warranty, GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B1C, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a, E5b), SBAS, QZSS, NavIC; Bluetooh Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LDAC, LC3, Opus; HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, fanless, waterproof
Weight
221 g, Power Supply: 168 g
Price
650 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88.5 %
03/2024
Vivo X100 Pro
Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12		221 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"2800x1260
89 %
12/2023
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7		213 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2992x1344
86.8 %
02/2024
Nubia Z60 Ultra
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750		246 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"2480x1116
91.1 %
12/2023
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU		221 g256 GB NVMe6.70"2796x1290
89.1 %
02/2023
Vivo X90 Pro
Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11		214.9 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"2800x1260

vivo X100 Pro 名义上有 Startrail Blue、Sunset Orange 和 Asteroid Black 三种颜色，但目前只有黑色版本在欧洲有售。它的背面不再采用橙色机型专用的人造革材质，而是采用了粗糙的表面，但没有更详细的说明。这绝对不会留下指纹。

引人注目的摄像头驼峰由高度抛光的不锈钢镶边，并覆盖康宁大猩猩 Victus 玻璃。尽管设计气派，但 vivo 智能手机的重量并不重，拿在手上很舒适。vivo 没有提供有关正面玻璃的更多细节，但这是由额外的薄膜保护的。

X100 Pro 的做工非常出色。高光泽的铝制边框给智能手机带来了高品质的感觉，可以承受扭转而不发出声音。缝隙紧密均匀。

X100 Pro 还通过了 IP68 认证，即防尘防水。

(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）

尺寸比较

❌
164.1 mm 74.5 mm 9.3 mm 214.9 g164.05 mm 75.28 mm 9.05 mm 221 g163.98 mm 76.35 mm 8.78 mm 246 g162.6 mm 76.5 mm 8.8 mm 213 g159.9 mm 76.7 mm 8.25 mm 221 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

功能 - 配备 USB 3.2 的 vivo 智能手机

vivo X100 Pro 提供快速 USB 3.2 接口（第一代，复制测试：270.18 MB/s），还支持 OTG。不过，必须先在设置中激活，然后才能连接外围设备和外部数据载体。这些设备可以用 FAT、FAT32、exFAT 或 NTFS 格式化。但不支持有线图像输出。

此外，还配备了红外发射器，可用于控制空调系统、多媒体设备或摄像头等。蓝牙 5.4 和近场通信技术（NFC）使设备更加完善。

上图：麦克风、红外热像仪（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特）
上图：麦克风、红外热像仪（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特）
左图：（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特）
左图：（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特）
右：体积、力量（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特）
右：体积、力量（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特）
底部：扬声器、USB、麦克风、SIM 卡（摄影：Daniel Schmidt）
底部：扬声器、USB、麦克风、SIM 卡（摄影：Daniel Schmidt）

软件 - 具有不同用户界面的 X100 Pro

vivo X100 Pro 在中国将搭载较新的 OriginOS 4，而全球版本（也在欧洲）将继续使用 Funtouch OS 14。两者都基于Android 14；不会全面切换到 OriginOS。该系统看起来更现代，还配备了大量的 vivo 应用程序和 V-App Store，而在欧洲，这些完全被谷歌应用程序和 Play Store 所取代。不过，后者也可以通过 V-Appstore 安装。

中国版的一大缺点是预装了大量中国应用程序和服务。谷歌服务的通知也仅限于三个应用程序，而且许多功能和服务都没有翻译。另一方面，功能更新的速度要快得多，而且现在还有多种用户界面语言可供选择。

vivo 承诺在三年内提供安全补丁和主要更新，这在这个价位的手机中并不算长。不过，前者每月都会推出。

Funtouch OS 14

OriginOS 4

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - Wi-Fi 7 和良好定位

vivo X100 Pro 支持的频率范围很广，应该能够连接到世界上任何地方的移动网络。在大都市环境中，连接质量良好。

X100 Pro 名义上支持三个频段的 Wi-Fi 7，但在测试中，该智能手机无法与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器建立 6 GHz 的连接。我们将在下次更新后再次检查。

5 GHz 网络的传输速度明显高于 X90 Pro但仍低于标准。

蓝牙连接在测试中的续航能力并不突出。大约 9 米之后，与配对耳机（1More EVO Earbuds、LDAC）的连接就会断开。相比之下，与 Galaxy S23 Ultra作为底座，还能多连接几米。

Networking
Vivo X100 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
929 (min: 862) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
915 (min: 772) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1822 (min: 1665) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1838 (min: 1798) MBit/s ∼100%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
897 (min: 870) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
892 (min: 333) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1468 (min: 1069) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1467 (min: 1304) MBit/s ∼80%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
iperf3 receive AXE11000
969 (min: 488) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
915 (min: 477) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1680 (min: 920) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1761 (min: 909) MBit/s ∼96%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
iperf3 receive AXE11000
810 (min: 793) MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
931 (min: 893) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1534 (min: 1415) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1345 (min: 1298) MBit/s ∼73%
Vivo X90 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1787 (min: 928) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
227 (min: 115) MBit/s ∼24%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
229 (min: 219) MBit/s ∼13%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1814 (min: 1250) MBit/s ∼99%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
646 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼36%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
685 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼74%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1536 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1364 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼74%
01002003004005006007008009001000110012001300140015001600170018001900Tooltip
Vivo X100 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300, ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1822 (1665-1937)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, ARM Mali-G715 MP7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1469 (1069-1581)
Vivo X100 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300, ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1835 (1798-1853)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, ARM Mali-G715 MP7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1467 (1304-1676)
Vivo X100 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300, ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø927 (862-945)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, ARM Mali-G715 MP7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø896 (870-916)
Vivo X100 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300, ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø915 (772-967)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, ARM Mali-G715 MP7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø881 (333-944)
GPS 测试：户外
室外
GPS 测试：室内
室内

在室内，虽然会显示许多卫星，但手机在激活飞行模式后无法建立 GNSS 连接。卫星定位只有在数据连接激活的情况下才能实现，但也非常精确。

我们将 X100 Pro 与 Garmin Venu 2 智能手表进行了自行车骑行对比。智能手机对路线的跟踪并不准确，有时还会偏离轨道。不过，这对于导航任务来说应该不成问题。

全球导航卫星系统测试：环湖航行
全球导航卫星系统测试：环湖航行
全球导航卫星系统测试：转折点
全球导航卫星系统测试：转折点
全球导航卫星系统测试：总结
全球导航卫星系统测试：总结

电话功能和语音质量

X100 Pro 是一款双卡双待智能手机，可容纳两张 nanoSIM 卡或一张 eSIM 卡代替第二张 SIM 卡。支持 Wi-Fi 通话和 VoLTE。

将手机贴在耳边时，语音质量不错，轻微的背景噪音也能被可靠地过滤掉。vivo 智能手机在嘈杂的环境中会达到极限。

摄像头 - vivo X100 Pro，3 x 5000 万像素

与 vivo X100 Pro 自拍
与 vivo X100 Pro 自拍

前置摄像头的分辨率仍为 3200 万像素，但由于采用了 f/2.0，其捕捉光线的能力比前代产品要强 前置摄像头(f/2.5).尽管是固定对焦，但它的自拍效果令人印象深刻。它可以录制高达 60 FPS 的超高清视频。

vivo X100 Pro 背面配备了三个功能强大的 5000 万像素传感器，在规格表上给人留下了深刻印象。主传感器再次采用一英寸的索尼 IMX989。超广角镜头现在具有更高的分辨率，能拍摄出令人印象深刻的图像，尽管软件对某些轮廓的平滑处理有些过度。长焦镜头现在使用 4.3 倍放大率（100 毫米），也可用作微距镜头。数码变焦最大可达 100 倍。即使在较长的焦距下（最长约 230 毫米），照片依然非常出色。这当然也要归功于新一代蔡司 T 涂层，它可以防止镜头反光。此外，V3 芯片组再次配备了专用的 ISP。

总的来说，三摄像头的成像效果不错，动态范围也很吸引人。不过，在弱光环境下，降噪效果相当强，会吞噬一些细节。欧洲版的色彩平衡与中国版略有不同，尤其是在肤色方面。该机还配备了专业模式，提供丰富的设置选项，并允许以 RAW 和超级 RAW 格式拍摄。

录制的视频最高为 8k（30 FPS）、超高清（最高 60 FPS）或全高清（最高 240 FPS）。还提供比特率更高的模式，可将比特率提高一倍，达到 48 MBit/s。

vivo X100 Pro（全球版）vivo X100 Pro（中国版）
vivo X100 Pro（全球版）
vivo X100 Pro（中国版）

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide-angle5x ZoomLow-Light
ColorChecker
5.5 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
12 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
12 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Vivo X100 Pro: 8.68 ∆E min: 3.94 - max: 13.71 ∆E
ColorChecker
18.7 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
21 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
29.2 ∆E
17 ∆E
24.8 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
30.5 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
21 ∆E
27 ∆E
29.5 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Vivo X100 Pro: 20.9 ∆E min: 11.13 - max: 30.53 ∆E

附件和保修 - 含 120 瓦电源

vivo X100 Pro 的供货范围相对较广，包括一个 120 瓦的模块化电源装置、一条 USB-C 数据线、一个 SIM 卡针、一个黑色硅胶保护套和常见的文件资料。该电源也可用于笔记本电脑等其他设备，但功率仅限 65 瓦。vivo 没有提供任何可选配件。

保修期因地区不同而大相径庭。进口的中国版本只提供 12 个月的保修，捷克版本提供 24 个月的保修，而在奥地利，保修期则长达 36 个月。vivo 欧洲公司已确认，在国外购买的机型也可以在德国进行保修索赔，因为尽管与诺基亚（Nokia）存在专利纠纷，但服务团队仍然可以提供服务。我们曾报道过).

输入设备和操作 - X100 Pro 的光学指纹识别功能

vivo X100 Pro 的电容式触摸屏上覆盖着一层 ex-works 保护膜。它的滑动性能确实不错，但下面的玻璃却更滑。

线性振动电机（X 轴）可提供清晰灵敏的触觉反馈。显示屏上的光学指纹传感器可用于生物识别安全，同时还可通过前置摄像头进行安全性较低的人脸识别。

显示屏 - vivo X100 Pro 接近 3,000 cd/m²

子像素结构
子像素结构

vivo X100 Pro 的 AMOLED 显示屏在尺寸和分辨率方面与前代产品相同。它采用 LTPO 面板，可在 1 到 120 Hz 之间动态调节刷新率。

X100 Pro 的亮度也得到了大幅提升，在激活环境光传感器的情况下，纯白显示屏的平均亮度达到了 1,360 cd/m²。vivo 通过均匀的明暗区域分布（APL18）再次超越了这一已经非常不错的数值，然后在屏幕中央达到了 1866 cd/m²，我们甚至在 HDR 播放时测得了 2974 cd/m²。

vivo 采用了频率高达 2,160 Hz 的 PWM 调光技术，使 OLED 的闪烁更加人性化。然而，我们在最低亮度时只能测得 369 Hz（上图第一张），这肯定会让敏感的用户感到不适。只有当亮度进一步提高时，频率才会增加（15% 时，1,851 Hz，图 3）。然而，我们也能检测到振幅仅为 120 Hz 的低频闪烁。我们可以排除时间抖动的原因。这可能是用于减少运动模糊的黑帧插入（BFI）造成的。

1317
cd/m²		1417
cd/m²		1475
cd/m²
1245
cd/m²		1392
cd/m²		1425
cd/m²
1234
cd/m²		1358
cd/m²		1374
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1475 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1359.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.27 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 1392 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 0.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
Vivo X100 Pro
AMOLED, 2800x1260, 6.78		Google Pixel 8 Pro
OLED, 2992x1344, 6.70		Nubia Z60 Ultra
AMOLED, 2480x1116, 6.80		Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
OLED, 2796x1290, 6.70		Vivo X90 Pro
AMOLED, 2800x1260, 6.78
Screen
-56%
-107%
-54%
-45%
Brightness middle
1392
1510
8%
1003
-28%
1102
-21%
1018
-27%
Brightness
1360
1467
8%
1001
-26%
1102
-19%
1026
-25%
Brightness Distribution
84
92
10%
96
14%
98
17%
93
11%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.6
1.1
-83%
1.7
-183%
1.1
-83%
0.9
-50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.3
3.8
-192%
3.6
-177%
3.1
-138%
2.2
-69%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
0.9
1.7
-89%
3.1
-244%
1.6
-78%
1.9
-111%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.23 99%
2.26 97%
2.19 100%
2.26 97%
CCT
6540 99%
6670 97%
6257 104%
6555 99%
6473 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 369 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 369 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 369 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17908 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列

如果在设置中激活专业模式，AMOLED 显示屏的色彩还原效果会非常出色。在默认设置下，显示屏明显偏冷。

灰度（色彩模式：专业模式，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（色彩模式：专业模式，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩（色彩模式：专业模式，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩（色彩模式：专业模式，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩模式：专业模式，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩模式：专业模式，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（色彩模式：专业模式，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（色彩模式：专业模式，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.17 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5905 ms rise
↘ 0.575 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.61 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.3075 ms rise
↘ 0.303 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

vivo X100 Pro 凭借其巨大的亮度储备为户外使用做好了充分准备。在这里，只有表面反光会令人讨厌。

vivo 智能手机的可视角度非常好。没有明显的颜色变化，亮度也几乎没有降低，但在某些视角下我们可以看到轻微的彩虹光泽。

户外活动
户外活动
视角
视角

性能 - vivo 采用联发科 Dimensity 9300 技术

vivo X100 Pro 配备了 Dimensity 9300配备 16GB LPDDR5x 内存。这款来自联发科的顶级 SoC 完全专注于性能，没有使用节能内核，而是使用低频 Cortex-A720 内核来执行此类任务。

在 Geekbench 单核测试中，散热良好的 骁龙 8 代 3在多核测试中，Dimensity 9300 发挥了自己的优势，在对比中遥遥领先。该 SoC 在人工智能和系统基准测试中也表现出色。

Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.2 | Antutu v10 | Antutu v9 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench ML
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1702 Points +6%
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
1604 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300
  ()
1604 Points 0%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1384 Points -14%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1274 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=220, last 2 years)
911 Points -43%
Multi-Core
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
6681 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300
  ()
6681 Points 0%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
6543 Points -2%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
4232 Points -37%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
3624 Points -46%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=220, last 2 years)
2988 Points -55%
Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
2930 Points +33%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2268 Points +3%
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
2207 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300
  ()
2207 Points 0%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1970 Points -11%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1769 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 2930, n=105, last 2 years)
1390 Points -37%
Multi-Core
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
7408 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300
  ()
7408 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
7244 Points -2%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
7004 Points -5%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
5386 Points -27%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
4538 Points -39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 7408, n=105, last 2 years)
3840 Points -48%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2103436 Points +3%
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
2038807 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300
  ()
2038807 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
1487075 Points -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (281399 - 2162423, n=51, last 2 years)
1249818 Points -39%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1113506 Points -45%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
1484501 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300
  ()
1484501 Points 0%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1175789 Points -21%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
896410 Points -40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)
738503 Points -50%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
18445 Points +27%
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
14573 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300
  ()
14573 Points 0%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
11824 Points -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=215, last 2 years)
11771 Points -19%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
9765 Points -33%
CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
1408 Points +8%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1331 Points +2%
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
1301 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300
  ()
1301 Points 0%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
935 Points -28%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
932 Points -28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=165, last 2 years)
837 Points -36%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
11438 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300
  ()
11438 Points 0%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
10966 Points -4%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
6755 Points -41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)
5759 Points -50%
System
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
15863 Points +27%
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
12477 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300
  ()
12477 Points 0%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
9767 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)
9672 Points -22%
Memory
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
12306 Points +9%
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
11309 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300
  ()
11309 Points 0%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
9245 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)
6267 Points -45%
Graphics
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
58651 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300
  ()
58651 Points 0%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
34538 Points -41%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
27698 Points -53%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)
14220 Points -76%
Web
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2145 Points +4%
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
2068 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300
  ()
2068 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)
1495 Points -28%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
843 Points -59%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
66541 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300
  ()
66541 Points 0%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
44483 Points -33%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
27018 Points -59%
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=150, last 2 years)
21814 Points -67%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
17407 Points -74%
AImark - Score v3.x
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
49660 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300
  ()
49660 Points 0%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
31865 Points -36%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
29087 Points -41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 245629, n=105, last 2 years)
17833 Points -64%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1623 Points -97%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1109 Points -98%
Geekbench ML
0.6 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
3410 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300
  ()
3410 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (378 - 3410, n=8, last 2 years)
894 Points -74%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
473 Points -86%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite CPU
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
1247 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300
  ()
1247 Points 0%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1141 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (509 - 1342, n=8, last 2 years)
1129 Points -9%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite GPU
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1257 Points +29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (978 - 1478, n=8, last 2 years)
1185 Points +21%
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 16384
978 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300
  ()
978 Points 0%

与 Dimensity 9300是一个 ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12它还支持基于硬件的光线追踪。

其性能非常高，可以满足所有要求。不过，特别是在基于 Vulkan 的现代基准测试和光线追踪方面，Adreno 750 MP12 Adreno 750要快得多。

不过，X100 Pro 在游戏中的表现非常出色和稳定。在《PUGB Mobile》中，我们只能使用超高清设置，而在高清模式下，帧率达到了 40 FPS。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5248 Points
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5175 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
3879 Points -26%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3792 Points -28%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2410 Points -54%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5211 Points +8%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4817 Points
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3783 Points -21%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
3765 Points -22%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2422 Points -50%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19641 Points +12%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
17613 Points
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
15260 Points -13%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13492 Points -23%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8922 Points -49%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8582 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7922 Points
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6894 Points -13%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5044 Points -36%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25785 Points
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
22483 Points -13%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13743 Points -47%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
17516 Points
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14878 Points -15%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9935 Points -43%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8758 Points +10%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7975 Points
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
6106 Points -23%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6026 Points -24%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8720 Points +11%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7845 Points
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
6478 Points -17%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5870 Points -25%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
791 fps
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
546 fps -31%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
451 fps -43%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
444 fps -44%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
348 fps -56%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
363 fps +31%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
277 fps
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
265 fps -4%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
262 fps -5%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
174 fps -37%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps -4%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
104 fps -13%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
279 fps +11%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
251 fps
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
180 fps -28%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
113 fps -55%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps -55%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
100 fps
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81 fps -19%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps -29%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -40%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -40%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
162 fps +9%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
148 fps
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
110 fps -26%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
89 fps -40%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps -49%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
86 fps
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82 fps -5%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps -27%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -30%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
55 fps -36%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
94 fps +13%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83 fps
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
61 fps -27%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51 fps -39%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -55%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
116 fps
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps -9%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
91 fps -22%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -48%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
59 fps -49%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
229 fps +16%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
198 fps
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
117 fps -41%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
111 fps -44%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps -51%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
42 fps +27%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
33 fps
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
25 fps -24%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps -27%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps -52%
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
254.048 Points +47%
Nubia Z60 Ultra (Edge 120)
197.49 Points +14%
Nubia Z60 Ultra (Chrome 121)
69.161 Points -60%
Vivo X100 Pro (Chrome 121)
173.403 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300 ()
173.4 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)
106.1 Points -39%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
105.175 Points -39%
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109)
67.646 Points -61%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
445 runs/min +90%
Vivo X100 Pro (Chrome 121)
234 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300 ()
234 runs/min 0%
Nubia Z60 Ultra (Edge 120)
215 runs/min -8%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
158 runs/min -32%
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)
107.1 runs/min -54%
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109)
60.2 runs/min -74%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Vivo X100 Pro (Chrome 121)
183 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300 ()
183 Points 0%
Nubia Z60 Ultra (Edge 120)
161 Points -12%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
103 Points -44%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=160, last 2 years)
100.2 Points -45%
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109)
66 Points -64%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
304 Points +53%
Vivo X100 Pro (Chrome 121)
199 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300 ()
199 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)
133.1 Points -33%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
129 Points -35%
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109)
82 Points -59%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
86270 Points +29%
Nubia Z60 Ultra (Edge 120)
68315 Points +2%
Vivo X100 Pro (Chrome 121)
66656 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300 ()
66656 Points 0%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
49506 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=214, last 2 years)
33357 Points -50%
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109)
21648 Points -68%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109)
1847.5 ms * -165%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)
1595 ms * -128%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
840.2 ms * -20%
Vivo X100 Pro (Chrome 121)
698.2 ms *
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300 ()
698 ms * -0%
Nubia Z60 Ultra (Edge 120)
646.8 ms * +7%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
388.3 ms * +44%

* ... smaller is better

Vivo X100 ProGoogle Pixel 8 ProNubia Z60 UltraVivo X90 ProAverage 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-71%
2%
-18%
-13%
-59%
Sequential Read 256KB
3986.41
1501.13
-62%
3926.73
-1%
3866.75
-3%
3712 ?(2451 - 4512, n=19)
-7%
1506 ?(226 - 4512, n=219, last 2 years)
-62%
Sequential Write 256KB
3461.77
257.28
-93%
3518.47
2%
2643.38
-24%
3042 ?(1524 - 3678, n=19)
-12%
1115 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=219, last 2 years)
-68%
Random Read 4KB
450.24
156.16
-65%
477.73
6%
367.89
-18%
416 ?(268 - 480, n=19)
-8%
247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=219, last 2 years)
-45%
Random Write 4KB
709.25
258.92
-63%
701.13
-1%
521.43
-26%
530 ?(174.3 - 709, n=19)
-25%
271 ?(13 - 709, n=219, last 2 years)
-62%

FPS in games

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Vivo X100 Pro; Asphalt 9: Legends: Ø58.3 (50-60)
Vivo X100 Pro; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 4.4.0_20481013_20559831: Ø58.9 (40-60)
Vivo X100 Pro; Genshin Impact; medium 120 fps; 4.4.0_20481013_20559831: Ø58.6 (53-60)
Vivo X100 Pro; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 4.4.0_20481013_20559831: Ø58.6 (29-60)
Vivo X100 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.0.0: Ø88.8 (19-90)
Vivo X100 Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.0.0: Ø40 (33-41)

排放 - Dimensity 9300 在负载情况下严重节流

温度

不出所料，vivo X100 Pro 在空闲状态下仍能保持宜人的凉爽，尽管在持续负载的情况下，表面温度在某些地方会攀升至 47.5 °C，但这是无害的，日常使用中很少会达到这种温度。

在 3DMark 压力测试中，SoC 会严重节流，长期运行速度会更慢。

Max. Load
 46.4 °C46.2 °C44.1 °C 
 47.5 °C47.5 °C45.5 °C 
 46.4 °C47 °C45.3 °C 
Maximum: 47.5 °C
Average: 46.2 °C
42.7 °C45.1 °C42.3 °C
44.3 °C44.3 °C40.6 °C
42.1 °C42.3 °C44.6 °C
Maximum: 45.1 °C
Average: 43.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  28.9 °C | Room Temperature 20.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.5 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
78.9 % +51%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78.8 % +51%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
74.1 % +42%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67.3 % +29%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52.2 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81.7 % +38%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76.3 % +29%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 % +28%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
65.4 % +10%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59.3 %
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83.8 % +118%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
66.1 % +72%
Vivo X100 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
38.4 %
0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Vivo X100 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø20.4 (17-28.6)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø12.4 (11-14.5)
Nubia Z60 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø26.6 (23.9-31.3)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø17.1 (16.4-25)
Vivo X100 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø65.4 (49.5-95)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø45.7 (40.7-51.6)
Nubia Z60 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø84.6 (75.1-111.7)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø52.8 (47.3-60)
Vivo X100 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø16.6 (9.55-24.9)
Nubia Z60 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø26.5 (24.4-29.1)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability: Ø15.5 (14.1-21.3)
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Vivo X100 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø88.2 (73.7-104)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø47.9 (43.4-53.7)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø62.8 (55.9-93.3)
Vivo X100 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø19.9 (15.3-27.8)
Nubia Z60 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø27.9 (25.8-29.4)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø15.4 (14.1-17.8)

发言人

在中等音量下，vivo X100 Pro 的两个扬声器能发出非常悦耳的声音；在最大音量下，高音占主导地位，而且还会出现失真。

此外，还可以通过 USB 连接有线扬声器或耳机。此外，还提供支持多种音频编解码器的无线蓝牙功能。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2028.636.22525.9343123.4334027.330.65036.237.86325.430.48016.636.310016.934.712514.746.616013.156.620015.154.725014.354.631511.656.64001054.95009.165.763011.1698009.171.9100011.875.712501578.4160011.377.920001279250012.381.4315012.782.8400012.679.3500013.174.8630013.474.9800013.572.61000013.568.11250013.6701600013.664SPL24.790N0.677.2median 13.1median 71.9Delta1.310.438.440.931.222.725.125.929.926.632.133.523.128.323.631.422.437.416.848.716.559.313.459.814.158.612.956.21358.311.763.211.668.312.972.313.374.813.174.612.47512.678.312.577.312.480.112.780.613.181.813.578.513.670.313.46813.671.813.4612589.40.677.3median 13.1median 71.81.29.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseVivo X100 ProGoogle Pixel 8 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Vivo X100 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Google Pixel 8 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - 为 vivo X100 Pro 提供更多电量

耗电量

vivo 智能手机在空闲状态下的功耗堪称典范。不出所料，它在负载情况下需要更多的电量，但即使如此，vivo 似乎也将其控制在 11.8 瓦的范围内，因为在 CPU 和 GPU 满载的情况下，两个组件的功耗几乎降低了 50%。

X100 Pro 的充电功率可达 100 瓦，无线充电功率可达 50 瓦。还支持反向无线充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.23 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.46 / 0.92 / 0.95 Watt
Load midlight 11.72 / 11.79 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Vivo X100 Pro
2700 mAh		Google Pixel 8 Pro
5050 mAh		Nubia Z60 Ultra
6000 mAh		Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
4422 mAh		Vivo X90 Pro
4870 mAh		Average MediaTek Dimensity 9300
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-21%
-57%
-30%
-57%
0%
-28%
Idle Minimum *
0.46
0.63
-37%
0.69
-50%
0.5
-9%
0.9
-96%
0.46 ?()
-0%
0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years)
-95%
Idle Average *
0.92
1.47
-60%
1.52
-65%
1.97
-114%
2.32
-152%
0.92 ?()
-0%
1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years)
-58%
Idle Maximum *
0.95
1.55
-63%
1.6
-68%
1.99
-109%
2.39
-152%
0.95 ?()
-0%
1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years)
-71%
Load Average *
11.72
8.45
28%
14.73
-26%
3.36
71%
3.64
69%
11.7 ?()
-0%
5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years)
53%
Load Maximum *
11.79
8.63
27%
20.82
-77%
10.43
12%
6.53
45%
11.8 ?()
-0%
8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years)
30%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Vivo X100 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.17 (0.094-11.7)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.62 (0.838-8.49)
Vivo X100 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.627 (0.53-1.356)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.749 (0.708-1.133)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Vivo X100 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.7 (11.4-11.7)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.6 (5.39-7.54)
Vivo X100 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.627 (0.53-1.356)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.749 (0.708-1.133)

电池寿命

vivo 宣称 X100 Pro 配备 5400 毫安时电池。这实际上是一块 2,700 mAh 的电池，但它的工作电压更高（7.78 V），因此在瓦时（Wh）方面与其他智能手机的 5,400 mAh 和 3.89 V 传统电池性能相同。

在调整了显示屏亮度（150 cd/m²）的 WLAN 测试中，运行时间表现非常出色。由于我们在展会期间也使用了这款智能手机，因此我们可以在此补充说明，相机耗电严重。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 120)
18h 47min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Vivo X100 Pro
2700 mAh
1127 min
Google Pixel 8 Pro
5050 mAh
760 min
Nubia Z60 Ultra
6000 mAh
1275 min
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
4422 mAh
1163 min
Vivo X90 Pro
4870 mAh
909 min

Pros

+ 精确明亮的显示屏
+ 电池寿命长
+ 良好的摄像头设置
+ 长达三年的保修
+ 快速充电

Cons

- 仅三年更新
- USB 无图像输出
- SoC 节流严重

评价--大有改进，但并非完美无瑕

回顾：vivo X100 Pro。测试设备由 vivo 奥地利公司和深圳贸易公司提供。(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
回顾：vivo X100 Pro。测试设备由 vivo 奥地利公司和深圳贸易公司提供。(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）

在 X100 Pro 上，vivo 吸收了前代产品的一些批评意见，并做得更好。例如，vivo 全面改进了显示屏：它非常明亮，色彩还原准确，现在还使用了经济的 LTPO。该制造商还对摄像头的附加镜头进行了全面修改，现在可以提供一个非常全面的整体包，它还继续受益于专用的 ISP 和与蔡司的合作。这款智能手机还通过了 IP68 认证，并附带了宽敞的供货范围。

vivo 不得不忍受批评，尤其是在更新周期相对较短的问题上。这个价位段的大多数制造商都提供至少五年的服务。不过，vivo 取消了 USB 有线图像输出功能也令人遗憾。

vivo X100 Pro 是一款功能强大的高端智能手机，它最大的缺点可能就是更新周期短。

 

vivo X100 Pro 的有力替代品包括：Pixel 8 Pro ，三星Galaxy S24 Ultra ，或小米 14 。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

vivo X100 Pro 在奥地利和捷克共和国的正规商店有售。如果您喜欢更便宜的进口版本，但受到上述限制，您可以在深圳贸易公司（TradingShenzhen）找到它。

Vivo X100 Pro - 03/07/2024 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
91%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
56 / 70 → 80%
Weight
88%
Battery
92%
Display
94%
Games Performance
73 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
97 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
84%
Noise
100%
Audio
74 / 90 → 82%
Camera
79%
Average
83%
89%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > vivo X100 Pro 评测--配备蔡司相机的高端智能手机令人印象深刻
Daniel Schmidt, 2024-03-12 (Update: 2024-03-12)