Notebookcheck Logo

努比亚 Z60 Ultra 评测--价格小巧、摄像头独特的高端智能手机

廉价旗舰手机？ 时隔多年之后，努比亚再次在全球范围内销售其一款旗舰手机。这款手机相当出色：骁龙 8 代 3、UDC、IP 认证、独特的三摄像头设置等等。你已经可以用不到 700 欧元（600 美元）的价格买到这款手机。真正的隐藏精品？
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）

继努比亚 Z50 Ultra未能在全球范围内正式发布，只能以进口设备的形式销售之后，终于有了全球版本的 Z60 Ultra。这家与中兴通讯有关联的公司保留了前代产品引人注目的设计，并再次提供了焦距相对独特的相机系统。

除了速度极快的 骁龙 8 代 3之外，努比亚自己的游戏手机 红魔 9 ProZ60 Ultra 的目标是通过 IP 认证、大容量内存和存储、大容量电池，尤其是仅 679 欧元（599 美元）的实惠起价赢得消费者的青睐。请阅读我们的评测，看看这款努比亚手机能否成为 2024 年的旗舰杀手。

Nubia Z60 Ultra
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 8 x 2.3 - 3.3 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720 / A720 / A520 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 750
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
6.80 inch 20:9, 2480 x 1116 pixel 400 PPI, capacitive, 1200 Hz touch sampling rate, BOE Q9+, AMOLED, 2160 Hz PWM dimming, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 490.56 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: G-Sensor, eCompass, Gyroscope, Proximity, Sensor Hub, OTG
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.78 x 163.98 x 76.35
Battery
6000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (IMX800, 35 mm, f/1.59, OIS) + 50 MPix (Wide, OV50e40, 18 mm, f/1.8, OIS) + 64 MPix (2.4x opt. Zoom, OV64b40, 85 mm, OIS), Camera2 API Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (OV12d2q, f/2.0, FF)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: On-screen, Screen protector, clear bumper, charger, USB Cable, SIM ejector tool, MyOS 14, 12 Months Warranty, GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B2a, B1C), Galileo (E1, E5a, E5b), QZSS (L1, L5), IP68; DRM Widevine L1; HDR: HLG, HDR10; Body-SAR: 1.482 W/kg, Head-SAR: 1.253 W/kg, fanless, waterproof
Weight
246 g
Price
899 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86.8 %
02/2024
Nubia Z60 Ultra
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750		246 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"2480x1116
91.1 %
12/2023
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU		221 g256 GB NVMe6.70"2796x1290
89 %
12/2023
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7		213 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2992x1344
89.4 %
01/2024
Xiaomi 14 Pro
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750		223 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.73"3200x1440

努比亚 Z60 Ultra 采用了相当方正的设计，背面的摄像头设置非常突出。该设备相对较重，重 246 克（0.54 磅），但拿在手上很舒适，也不会头重脚轻。得益于其深色铝合金边框和磨砂背玻璃，指纹几乎无处遁形。

我们非常喜欢 Z60 Ultra 的制造质量。没有任何吱吱作响、晃动或松动。缝隙小而均匀。正面由康宁大猩猩 5 号玻璃保护。手机的防尘防水等级也达到了 IP68。

努比亚 Z60 Ultra 有银色和黑色两种颜色可供选择。

(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）

尺寸比较

❌
163.98 mm 76.35 mm 8.78 mm 246 g162.6 mm 76.5 mm 8.8 mm 213 g161.4 mm 75.3 mm 8.49 mm 223 g159.9 mm 76.7 mm 8.25 mm 221 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

规格：内置 USB 3.2 和红外爆破器

努比亚为全球市场提供三个版本的手机：

内存/存储 颜色 价格
8/256 GB 黑色 679 欧元/599 美元
12/256 GB 黑色或银色 749 欧元/649 美元
16/512 GB 黑色或银色 €899/US$779

尽管努比亚为基本机型定价非常实惠，但如果你需要更多存储空间，特别是由于无法添加 microSD 卡，你就需要准备好高昂的费用。

虽然该公司没有提供 USB 端口的详细规格，但我们的拷贝测试中的高数据传输速度（888.84 MB/s）表明它是 USB 3.2 Gen 2 接口，特别是考虑到它支持通过电缆输出超高清视频。该接口还具有 USB-OTG 功能；连接到手机上的存储设备可以格式化为 FAT32、exFAT 或 NTFS。

无论如何，Z60 Ultra 配备了一套完善的功能：此外，还配备了 NFC、蓝牙 5.4 和红外触发器。

上图：红外热像仪、麦克风（摄影：Daniel Schmidt）
顶部：红外热像仪、麦克风
左（照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
左侧
右：音量摇杆、电源按钮、滑动开关（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特）
右侧音量摇杆、电源按钮、滑动开关
底部：麦克风、扬声器、USB、麦克风、SIM 卡插槽（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特）
底部麦克风、扬声器、USB、麦克风、SIM 卡插槽

软件 - 目前使用Android 14，但只有少量更新

Z60 Ultra 目前使用的是谷歌Android 14，上面还有努比亚的 MyOS 14 定制 UI。在进行这次评测时，安全补丁的日期是 2023 年 12 月 1 日，因此仍然是相当最新的。努比亚还没有公布有关更新间隔的更多细节，但目标是提供长达三年的支持。至于该设备的主要更新次数，目前还没有任何消息。至于是否会有一个以上的更新，目前尚无定论。

连接性和全球导航卫星系统 - Z60 Ultra 具有 6 GHz Wi-Fi 功能

在蜂窝连接方面，努比亚 Z60 Ultra 兼容当前所有标准（包括 5G Sub-6）和各种频段。在我们的评测中，这款手机在大都市环境中表现出了良好的接收能力。

Z60 Ultra 支持最新的 Wi-Fi 7 标准，也可以在 6 GHz 频段工作。与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 配合使用时，它能达到很高且基本稳定的传输速度。

Networking
Nubia Z60 Ultra
iperf3 receive AXE11000
969 (min: 488) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
915 (min: 477) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1680 (min: 920) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1761 (min: 909) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
iperf3 receive AXE11000
810 (min: 793) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
931 (min: 893) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1534 (min: 1415) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1345 (min: 1298) MBit/s ∼76%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
897 (min: 870) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
892 (min: 333) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1468 (min: 1069) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1467 (min: 1304) MBit/s ∼83%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1717 (min: 1627) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1783 (min: 911) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1728 (min: 1374) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1731 (min: 1657) MBit/s ∼98%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
646 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼38%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
685 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼38%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1536 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1364 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼77%
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Nubia Z60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1649 (920-1834)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, ARM Mali-G715 MP7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1469 (1069-1581)
Nubia Z60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1725 (909-1803)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, ARM Mali-G715 MP7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1467 (1304-1676)
Nubia Z60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø951 (488-978)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, ARM Mali-G715 MP7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø896 (870-916)
Nubia Z60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø915 (477-1010)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, ARM Mali-G715 MP7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø881 (333-944)
GPS 测试：户外
GPS 测试：户外
GPS 测试：在建筑物内
GPS 测试：在建筑物内

努比亚手机的定位能力很强，在户外可以非常快速准确地找到自己的位置。在建筑物内，尽管信号开始变得相当微弱，手机仍能准确识别自己的位置。

我们骑车将努比亚手机与 Garmin Venu 2 健身智能手表进行了比较。两款设备的结果相当接近，不过 Z60 Ultra 在某些路段的定位更加准确。

GNSS 测试骑行：环湖
GNSS 测试骑行：环湖
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：转折点
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：转折点
全球导航卫星系统试乘：总结
全球导航卫星系统试乘：总结

通话功能和语音质量

虽然 Z60 Ultra 是一款双卡双待手机，可容纳两张 nano SIM 卡，但它不支持 eSIM 卡。它兼容 VoLTE，但不支持 Wi-Fi 通话。

将设备放在耳边时，声音清晰可辨。不过，背景噪声抑制效果一般。免提电话的麦克风范围相当长，但用户的声音会伴随着可听到的噪音。

摄像头 - 独特的三摄像头设置，成像性能良好

努比亚 Z60 Ultra 自拍照
努比亚 Z60 Ultra 自拍照

努比亚 Z60 Ultra 配备了显示屏下前置摄像头，使屏幕呈现无缝设计。该摄像头只能在适当的光线条件下仔细观察，但在质量方面还有待提高。使用该摄像头拍摄的照片显得有些暗淡无光，而且只能录制最高全高清（30 帧/秒）的视频。

努比亚在主摄像头模块的焦距上另辟蹊径，选择了相当独特的长度。例如，主摄像头使用 35 毫米（相当于 35 毫米），而不是通常的 24 或 26 毫米，这就使拍摄对象更靠近镜头。实际上，这一点也不会让我们感到困扰；事实上，在测试过程中，我们非常喜欢这种做法。成像性能同样不错，只有在光线不足的情况下成像质量才会略有下降。从兔子的照片中就能看出这一点：明亮的区域容易被遮挡。不过，在湖边的场景中，Z60 Ultra 却能拍摄出细节丰富的高动态照片。

超广角相机的焦距也更长（18 毫米）。这有利于提高质量，但会导致视野大幅缩小。该镜头也可用于微距拍摄。

长焦镜头同样效果出色，变焦倍率为 2.4 倍（85 毫米）。使用数码变焦时，您会发现 5 倍变焦使您更接近拍摄对象，等效焦距为 170 毫米，而不是通常的 120 毫米。该相机的变焦倍数最高可达 30 倍（1,000 毫米）。所有三个镜头都配备了光学防抖（OIS）功能。专业模式还支持 RAW 格式。

视频可录制为 8K（30 帧/秒）。在超高清或更低的格式下，帧频甚至可高达 120 帧/秒。


Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide camera5x zoomLow-light
ColorChecker
3.6 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
3 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
3 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Nubia Z60 Ultra: 4.25 ∆E min: 1.4 - max: 8.57 ∆E
ColorChecker
21.8 ∆E
37.6 ∆E
29.7 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
42.8 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
24.7 ∆E
25.8 ∆E
21.9 ∆E
43.1 ∆E
43.8 ∆E
20.8 ∆E
34.6 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
43.1 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
32.3 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
45.5 ∆E
41.1 ∆E
31.3 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Nubia Z60 Ultra: 31.77 ∆E min: 12.77 - max: 45.45 ∆E

附件和保修 - 包装箱内容全面

努比亚 Z60 Ultra 包装盒内的物品（照片：Daniel Schmidt）
箱子内容

在欧盟，努比亚为国际版 Z60 Ultra 提供 24 个月的保修服务，不提供任何延期选项。请注意，保修期可能因地区而异。

包装盒内有一个模块化 80 瓦充电器、一条 USB-C 数据线、一个透明塑料保护套、一个 SIM 卡弹出工具和一份快速入门指南。但努比亚不出售任何可选配件。

输入设备和操作 - Z60 Ultra 带滑动开关

努比亚 Z60 Ultra 的电容式触摸屏可同时检测多达十个接触点，并预装了屏幕保护膜。屏幕表面非常光滑，整个显示屏对输入的响应迅速而精确。

线性振动电机可提供清晰的反馈，而且非常安静。生物识别安全由显示屏内的光学指纹扫描仪处理。它能可靠地完成工作，并立即解锁手机。您还可以通过前置摄像头使用人脸识别作为辅助或替代验证方法。


。

默认情况下，右侧的滑块可用于在街景模式下立即打开相机。不过，可以在设置中修改其功能（见截图）。

显示屏 - 120Hz 无缝 AMOLED

子像素结构
子像素结构

努比亚 Z60 Ultra 的 AMOLED 显示屏对角线尺寸为 6.8 英寸，采用全高清+分辨率，图像清晰。它的触摸采样率高达 960Hz，刷新率为 120Hz。但屏幕不是 LTPO 面板，这意味着系统只能在 60Hz 和 120Hz 之间自动切换。另外，你也可以选择将显示屏锁定在任一刷新率上。

对 HDR 标准的支持略显不足，因为你只能获得 HLG 和 HDR10，仅此而已。另一方面，在启用环境光传感器后，显示屏在显示全白图像时的峰值亮度很高，达到了 1,003 cd/m²。不过，无论是 APL 18（1,190 cd/m²）还是 HDR 播放（1,204 cd/m²），我们都无法达到努比亚宣称的 1,500 cd/m² 峰值亮度。在手动亮度控制方面，您最多可以控制 577 cd/m²。


。

在示波器上，OLED 显示屏以恒定的 60Hz 频率闪烁，并显示出非常均匀的振幅波形。努比亚提到的 PWM 调光频率高达 2,160 Hz，我们同样可以使用闪烁仪确认这一点。因此，显示屏应该比较容易看清，不会引起任何抱怨。

996
cd/m²		1013
cd/m²		1022
cd/m²
985
cd/m²		1003
cd/m²		1002
cd/m²
984
cd/m²		1003
cd/m²		998
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE Q9+ tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1022 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1000.7 cd/m² Minimum: 3.22 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1003 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
94.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
Nubia Z60 Ultra
AMOLED, 2480x1116, 6.80		Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
OLED, 2796x1290, 6.70		Google Pixel 8 Pro
OLED, 2992x1344, 6.70		Xiaomi 14 Pro
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.73
Screen
20%
28%
15%
Brightness middle
1003
1102
10%
1510
51%
1025
2%
Brightness
1001
1102
10%
1467
47%
1046
4%
Brightness Distribution
96
98
2%
92
-4%
95
-1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.7
1.1
35%
1.1
35%
1.1
35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.6
3.1
14%
3.8
-6%
2.9
19%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.1
1.6
48%
1.7
45%
2.2
29%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.19 100%
2.23 99%
2.25 98%
CCT
6257 104%
6555 99%
6670 97%
6622 98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 60 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25% 显示屏亮度
25%
50% 显示亮度
50%
75% 显示亮度
75%
最大显示亮度
100%

使用 Calman 进行的色彩分析验证了努比亚 Z60 Ultra 的出色效果。默认设置实际上产生了最佳值，而且还使用了更大的 DCI-P3 色域。

灰度（色彩模式：标准，色温：正常，目标色域：DCI-P3）
灰度（色彩模式：标准，色温：正常，目标色域：DCI-P3）
色彩（色彩模式：标准，色温：正常，目标色域：DCI-P3）
色彩（色彩模式：标准，色温：正常，目标色域：DCI-P3）
色彩空间（色彩模式：标准，色温：正常，目标色域：DCI-P3）
色彩空间（色彩模式：标准，色温：正常，目标色域：DCI-P3）
饱和度（色彩模式：标准，色温：正常，目标色域：DCI-P3）
饱和度（色彩模式：标准，色温：正常，目标色域：DCI-P3）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.692 ms rise
↘ 0.684 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.17 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.579 ms rise
↘ 0.594 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Z60 Ultra 在户外给人留下了很好的印象，屏幕在大多数光线条件下都能保持适当的可读性。唯一的问题是，当屏幕以轻微角度观看时，显示屏表面的反光会轻微影响可读性。

可视角度非常好。即使从非常锐利的角度观察屏幕，也不会出现任何色彩偏移，但亮度确实会稍有下降。

努比亚 Z60 Ultra 户外
户外活动
努比亚 Z60 Ultra 的视角
视角

性能 - 骁龙 8 代 3 处理器带来强劲动力

努比亚 Z60 Ultra 采用最新的 骁龙 8 代 3并可根据您选择的配置配备 8、12 或 16 GB 内存。这款手机的运行速度与你的预期一样快，甚至略微超过了它的主动散热表兄弟--红魔 9 Pro。 红魔 9 Pro在许多方面都略胜一筹。

同样，UFS 4.0 存储系统的运行也达到了很高的水平，使 Z60 Ultra 拥有流畅的系统性能。这款智能手机在浏览网页时速度很快，但在基准测试中与谷歌 Chrome 浏览器的配合并不好。因此，我们使用 Microsoft Edge 进行了基准测试。

Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.2 | Antutu v9 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1702 Points
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1687 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1575 - 1702, n=10)
1672 Points -2%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1274 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=220, last 2 years)
911 Points -46%
Multi-Core
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
6543 Points
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6439 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (5393 - 6543, n=10)
6103 Points -7%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
3624 Points -45%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=220, last 2 years)
2988 Points -54%
Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
2930 Points +29%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2278 Points 0%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2268 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (2127 - 2329, n=12)
2238 Points -1%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1769 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 2930, n=105, last 2 years)
1390 Points -39%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
7244 Points +3%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
7004 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (6432 - 7501, n=12)
6991 Points 0%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6875 Points -2%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
4538 Points -35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 7408, n=105, last 2 years)
3840 Points -45%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1521387 - 1650926, n=4)
1591473 Points
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
896410 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)
738503 Points
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
Points
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (15343 - 21628, n=11)
18565 Points +1%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
18445 Points
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
15876 Points -14%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
11824 Points -36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=215, last 2 years)
11771 Points -36%
CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
1408 Points +6%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1331 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1043 - 1474, n=8)
1227 Points -8%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1167 Points -12%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
935 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=165, last 2 years)
837 Points -37%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
10966 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (8165 - 10966, n=9)
10135 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)
5759 Points -47%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
Points -100%
System
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
15863 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (8611 - 15935, n=9)
14075 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)
9672 Points -39%
Memory
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
12306 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (8937 - 12716, n=9)
11005 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)
6267 Points -49%
Graphics
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
34538 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (29938 - 38586, n=9)
34206 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)
14220 Points -59%
Web
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2145 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1661 - 2145, n=9)
2009 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)
1495 Points -30%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
27018 Points +55%
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=150, last 2 years)
21814 Points +25%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
17407 Points
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
16988 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (13873 - 18370, n=10)
16833 Points -3%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1381 - 245629, n=9)
108185 Points +6566%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
29087 Points +1692%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 245629, n=105, last 2 years)
17833 Points +999%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1623 Points
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1109 Points -32%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
Points -100%

图形处理由集成的 Adreno 750在努比亚 Z60 Ultra 上，它能以最佳状态运行。特别是在 GFXBench 的 4K 测试中，这款手机能够略微领先，从而为游戏提供最佳属性。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5175 Points
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
3879 Points -25%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2410 Points -53%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5211 Points
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
3765 Points -28%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2422 Points -54%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19641 Points
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
15260 Points -22%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8922 Points -55%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8582 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5044 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13743 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9935 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
546 fps
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
543 fps -1%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
444 fps -19%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
348 fps -36%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
363 fps
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
362 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
262 fps -28%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
174 fps -52%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps +92%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
279 fps
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
269 fps -4%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
180 fps -35%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps -60%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88 fps +47%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps +18%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
162 fps
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
159 fps -2%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
110 fps -32%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps -54%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76 fps +27%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps +5%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
55 fps -8%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
94 fps
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
85 fps -10%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
61 fps -35%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -61%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps +82%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
91 fps +52%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
59 fps -2%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
229 fps
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
209 fps -9%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
117 fps -49%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps -57%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
42 fps
Xiaomi 14 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
39 fps -7%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
25 fps -40%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps -62%
Jetstream 2 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
254.048 Points +29%
Nubia Z60 Ultra (Edge 120)
197.49 Points
Nubia Z60 Ultra (Chrome 121)
69.161 Points -65%
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
162.564 Points -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (69.2 - 241, n=13)
158.3 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)
106.1 Points -46%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
105.175 Points -47%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
181 Points +12%
Nubia Z60 Ultra (Edge 120)
161 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (112 - 196, n=10)
158.8 Points -1%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
103 Points -36%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=160, last 2 years)
100.2 Points -38%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
86270 Points +26%
Nubia Z60 Ultra (Edge 120)
68315 Points
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
54365 Points -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (25953 - 70135, n=11)
54354 Points -20%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
49506 Points -28%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=214, last 2 years)
33357 Points -51%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)
1595 ms * -147%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
840.2 ms * -30%
Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
801.6 ms * -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (624 - 1154, n=11)
800 ms * -24%
Nubia Z60 Ultra (Edge 120)
646.8 ms *
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
388.3 ms * +40%

* ... smaller is better

Nubia Z60 UltraGoogle Pixel 8 ProHonor Magic5 ProXiaomi 14Average 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-71%
-35%
-15%
-14%
-60%
Sequential Read 256KB
3926.73
1501.13
-62%
3344.12
-15%
3385.74
-14%
3712 ?(2451 - 4512, n=19)
-5%
1506 ?(226 - 4512, n=219, last 2 years)
-62%
Sequential Write 256KB
3518.47
257.28
-93%
2651.87
-25%
2906.65
-17%
3042 ?(1524 - 3678, n=19)
-14%
1115 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=219, last 2 years)
-68%
Random Read 4KB
477.73
156.16
-67%
267.91
-44%
420.99
-12%
416 ?(268 - 480, n=19)
-13%
247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=219, last 2 years)
-48%
Random Write 4KB
701.13
258.92
-63%
298.31
-57%
594.78
-15%
530 ?(174.3 - 709, n=19)
-24%
271 ?(13 - 709, n=219, last 2 years)
-61%

发射 - 努比亚 Z60 Ultra 的双扬声器

温度

努比亚 Z60 Ultra 的皮肤温度在负载情况下会上升到很高的水平。尽管我们在 Burnout Benchmark 中已经被迫将设置降低到纯 CPU 负载，否则应用程序就会崩溃，但还是出现了这种情况。

在 3Dmark 压力测试中，该设备也出现了明显的性能损失，但仍然比 iPhone 15 Pro Max.

Max. Load
 40.6 °C45 °C41.3 °C 
 46.6 °C47 °C43.8 °C 
 47 °C45 °C43.7 °C 
Maximum: 47 °C
Average: 44.4 °C
38.5 °C45 °C41.8 °C
42.3 °C45 °C46.3 °C
41.8 °C46.5 °C46.4 °C
Maximum: 46.5 °C
Average: 43.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  27.8 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.5 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
78.9 % +17%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78.8 % +17%
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67.3 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76.3 %
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 % 0%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
65.4 % -14%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Nubia Z60 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83.8 %
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
66.1 % -21%
0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Nubia Z60 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø26.6 (23.9-31.3)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø17.1 (16.4-25)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø12.4 (11-14.5)
Nubia Z60 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø84.6 (75.1-111.7)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø52.8 (47.3-60)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø45.7 (40.7-51.6)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø62.8 (55.9-93.3)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø47.9 (43.4-53.7)
Nubia Z60 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø27.9 (25.8-29.4)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø15.4 (14.1-17.8)
Nubia Z60 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø26.5 (24.4-29.1)
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability: Ø15.5 (14.1-21.3)

发言人

虽然 Z60 Ultra 上的两个扬声器音量很大，但音域很窄，音量大时会开始失真。对于偶尔的音频播放来说，Z60 Ultra 的音质无疑是足够好的，但如果你想更频繁地使用媒体，建议使用外置播放设备。

有线耳机可以连接到 USB-C 端口。对于无线设备，蓝牙可支持多种编解码器：SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive、aptX TWS+、LDAC、LC3 和 Opus。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2028.633.62525.933.63123.436.24027.340.75036.242.86325.442.48016.639.510016.938.712514.740.916013.147.720015.151.925014.354.631511.657.740010625009.168.863011.168.98009.170.8100011.874.612501575.4160011.375.820001279.8250012.381.1315012.784.3400012.687.4500013.180.6630013.476.6800013.574.61000013.570.31250013.663.61600013.658.6SPL24.792.5N0.685.5median 13.1median 70.8Delta1.310.838.440.931.222.725.125.929.926.632.133.523.128.323.631.422.437.416.848.716.559.313.459.814.158.612.956.21358.311.763.211.668.312.972.313.374.813.174.612.47512.678.312.577.312.480.112.780.613.181.813.578.513.670.313.46813.671.813.4612589.40.677.3median 13.1median 71.81.29.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNubia Z60 UltraGoogle Pixel 8 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nubia Z60 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Google Pixel 8 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命：6,000 毫安时，续航能力超强

耗电量

努比亚 Z60 Ultra 的功耗处于较低水平。只有在测试设置下运行 "Burnout Benchmark "时，才会观察到相对较高的负载值。之后功耗明显降低，最终稳定在 15 瓦左右。

6,000 毫安时电池可通过有线连接以高达 80 瓦的功率充电，但不支持无线充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.07 / 0.26 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.69 / 1.52 / 1.6 Watt
Load midlight 14.73 / 20.82 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Nubia Z60 Ultra
6000 mAh		Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
4422 mAh		Google Pixel 8 Pro
5050 mAh		Xiaomi 14 Pro
4880 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
20%
23%
26%
21%
19%
Idle Minimum *
0.69
0.5
28%
0.63
9%
0.89
-29%
0.818 ?(0.51 - 1, n=9)
-19%
0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years)
-30%
Idle Average *
1.52
1.97
-30%
1.47
3%
1.05
31%
1.196 ?(0.89 - 1.52, n=9)
21%
1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years)
4%
Idle Maximum *
1.6
1.99
-24%
1.55
3%
1.11
31%
1.279 ?(0.91 - 1.6, n=9)
20%
1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years)
-2%
Load Average *
14.73
3.36
77%
8.45
43%
9.03
39%
9.25 ?(3.34 - 14.7, n=9)
37%
5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years)
62%
Load Maximum *
20.82
10.43
50%
8.63
59%
9.06
56%
10.9 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=9)
48%
8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years)
60%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011121314151617Tooltip
Nubia Z60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.37 (0.957-17.6)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.62 (0.838-8.49)
Nubia Z60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.948 (0.88-1.177)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.749 (0.708-1.133)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Nubia Z60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø15.2 (13.6-16.4)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.6 (5.39-7.54)
Nubia Z60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.948 (0.88-1.177)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.749 (0.708-1.133)

电池寿命

在电池续航时间方面，它的电池容量非常大。6000 毫安时的电池容量已经相当可观。即便如此，这款手机在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中仍能提供超过 21 小时的超长续航时间，令我们惊叹不已。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 120)
21h 15min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Nubia Z60 Ultra
6000 mAh
1275 min
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
4422 mAh
1163 min
Google Pixel 8 Pro
5050 mAh
760 min
Xiaomi 14 Pro
4880 mAh
897 min

Pros

+ 迅捷的 SoC
+ 明亮、无缝的 120Hz AMOLED 屏幕
+ 电池寿命长
+ 快速无线网络连接
+ IP68 认证

Cons

- 不支持 eSIM
- 扬声器效果一般
- 温度过高
- 不支持无线充电
- 支持更新时间短

评价--出色，但不是最好的

努比亚 Z60 Ultra 评测。评测机由努比亚友情提供。
努比亚 Z60 Ultra 评测。评测机由努比亚友情提供。

通过 Z60 Ultra，努比亚推出了一款非常令人兴奋的手机，它拥有众多高端功能，因此是一款极具吸引力的低价入门手机。除了迅捷的 骁龙 8 代 3之外，值得一提的还有无缝 AMOLED 显示屏。该设备还具有超长的电池续航时间、支持快速数据传输标准和 IP68 认证。

努比亚 Z60 Ultra 是一个非常不错的选择，但存储升级的价格不菲。

也就是说，这款手机还不具备成为旗舰杀手的实力。在技术方面，努比亚 Z60 Ultra 无法完全达到所宣传的峰值亮度，在负载情况下也会变得非常热。虽然显示屏下的前置摄像头实现了无凹槽和无孔设计，但其成像质量并不值得称道。同样，用户也将不得不放弃无线充电和 eSIM 支持。

支持更新的时间也相当短。不仅仅是 像素 8可以做得更好，去年发布的大多数高端手机仍然比 Z60 Ultra 提供更长的支持时间。摩托罗拉 摩托罗拉 Edge 40 Pro是一款入门价格相近的替代产品。

价格和供应情况

努比亚 Z60 Ultra 可直接从Nubia 购买。.手机保护套可从亚马逊等在线零售商处购买。

Nubia Z60 Ultra - 02/13/2024 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
86%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
57 / 70 → 81%
Weight
87%
Battery
93%
Display
92%
Games Performance
75 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
97 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
54%
Noise
100%
Audio
78 / 90 → 86%
Camera
76%
Average
81%
87%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

More articles related to this device

Nubia Z60 Ultra (Z60 Series)

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 努比亚 Z60 Ultra 评测--价格小巧、摄像头独特的高端智能手机
Daniel Schmidt, 2024-02-15 (Update: 2024-02-15)