Notebookcheck Logo

vivo X折叠式智能手机评论。这款折叠式手机的屏幕和摄像头都很灵活

中德友谊。 vivo X Fold是一款拥有可折叠屏幕的智能手机,有两个传统德国品牌作为合作伙伴。相机是与蔡司合作优化的,肖特提供保护玻璃。这款昂贵的智能手机作为中国进口产品是否能让人信服,可以在我们的测试中找到答案。
Android ARM Foldable Smartphone
vivo X 折叠
Vivo X Fold (X Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio
Graphics adapter
Memory
12288 MB 
Display
8.03 inch 9:8, 2160 x 1916 pixel 360 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 238 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, 2 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850/900/1800/1900MHz), 3G (850/1900/2100MHz), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B66), 5G (n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n12/n20/n28/n66/n38/n40/n41/n77/n78/n79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 14.6 x 162 x 142
Battery
4600 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix Quad: 50MP (f/1.8, 1/1.57", 1.0µm) + 8MP (5x optical zoom, f/3.4, 125mm) + 12MP (2x optical zoom, f/2.0, 47mm) + 48MP (f/2.2, 14mm)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.5
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, charger, USB cable, headset, SIM tool, Cover display: 6.53", 2520x1080, 21:9, AMOLED, 120Hz, fanless
Weight
311 g
Price
1877 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86.7 %
08/2022
Vivo X Fold
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
311 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash8.03"2160x1916
88.7 %
09/2021
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
271 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash7.60"2208x1768
87.3 %
07/2022
Vivo X Note
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
221 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash7.00"3080x1440
84.1 %
02/2022
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
284 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash8.30"2688x1892

箱子和设备。重但质量高

可折叠的智能手机是一件伟大的事情:它们在折叠时相当方便,但展开后屏幕可以扩展到几乎是平板电脑大小。

vivo X Fold实际上比它的主要竞争对手三星的Z Fold3更加宽广。 Galaxy Z Fold3打开后,但与微软Surface Duo 2的屏幕相比,则显得有些小。 微软Surface Duo 2尽管微软不能提供完全连续的显示屏。你还必须准备好携带比传统智能手机更多的重量--vivo X Fold特别重,有311克。

vivo的可折叠机的背面是用素食皮革覆盖的,即人造皮革,看起来质量很高,甚至在装饰条纹中给人以接缝的感觉,该条纹垂直于外壳,向左有轻微偏移。蓝色和黑色可作为颜色,其中这些指的是背面和框架。

框架是由铝制成的,保护性的Xensation Alpha玻璃是由德国制造商Schott提供的。它在抗划伤和抗跌落方面应该比其他保护性眼镜更好。肖特公司的柔性塑料玻璃也被用于内部,以及背面摄像头的保护玻璃。

目前,vivo X Fold仅作为中国进口产品出售。虽然它在中国可以以相当于1300欧元的价格购买,但在我们的合作伙伴TradingShenzhen的进口价格要高得多,略低于1600欧元。.

作为回报,你会得到一部装备精良的高端手机,拥有12GB的内存和256GB的大容量存储--512GB的版本在国际上也有。小的噱头,如外壳上的物理警报滑块和一个也可用于控制电视的红外传感器,都是不错的功能。

vivo X 折叠
vivo X 折叠
vivo X 折叠
vivo X 折叠

尺寸比较

184.5 mm 145.2 mm 5.5 mm 284 g168.8 mm 80.3 mm 8.75 mm 221 g162 mm 142 mm 14.6 mm 311 g158.2 mm 128.1 mm 6.4 mm 271 g

通信、软件和操作。很适合西方的软件

幸运的是,即使作为一个中国进口产品,vivo X Fold也支持中欧所有必要的4G频段,并且也应该能够访问全球几乎所有国家的4G网络。5G也支持众多频段。在测试过程中,我们随机检查了该设备的接收情况,并与其他高端手机进行了比较,发现该手机即使在室内也有完整的4G接收。

Wi-Fi 6E不被支持,所以vivo X Fold不能在6GHz频段传输数据。即便如此,它还是实现了良好、稳定的传输速率。在我们使用参考路由器华硕ROG AXE11000的测试中,手机只显示了一个小的下降。

Origin OS Ocean是制造商安装的用户界面的名称。它是基于Android 12,但强烈适应中国市场。尽管如此,也可以选择英语或德语等语言,甚至可以通过账户菜单中的一个选项启用谷歌服务,所以你可以相对容易地使用谷歌商店和其他谷歌应用程序。甚至可以使用谷歌支付,以及所有重要的流媒体服务,这要归功于Widevine的认证。

然而,应该注意的是,该系统没有为西方市场进行开箱即用的优化。预装了许多中文应用程序,尽管其中大多数可以很容易地卸载。即使调整了语言选择,你也会时不时收到中文通知,你必须做出选择。如果你是一个不会说普通话的人,你不知道系统想从你这里得到什么。

由于两台显示器都支持120赫兹,所以操作起来非常流畅,也非常精确。折叠显示屏中间的折痕略微明显,也抑制了手指的滑行,但一般来说,内部触摸屏可以很好地操作。

vivo安装了两个屏下指纹传感器--一个在外屏,另一个在屏幕的右侧。你只需在两个传感器中的一个注册指纹,然后就可以在两个传感器上使用。即使在屏幕关闭的情况下,它们的工作也非常准确和迅速。二维面部识别也可以使用,而且工作起来没有问题,但它不太安全。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Wi-Fi 6E
1368 (671min - 1409max) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Wi-Fi 6E
893 (428min - 917max) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
1176 (380min - 1712max) MBit/s ∼100% +33%
Vivo X Fold
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
887 (845min - 940max) MBit/s ∼75%
Vivo X Note
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
717 (540min - 788max) MBit/s ∼61% -19%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
1032 (449min - 1423max) MBit/s ∼100% +12%
Vivo X Fold
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
923 (715min - 949max) MBit/s ∼89%
Vivo X Note
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
857 (831min - 878max) MBit/s ∼83% -7%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø922 (715-949)
; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø887 (845-940)

照相机。同时有两个自拍相机

户外前置摄像头样本
户外前置摄像头样本
前置摄像头内部样本
前置摄像头内部样本

vivo X Fold的主摄像头是一个来自三星的5000万像素传感器,与蔡司合作进行了优化。Isocell GN5是一个高端传感器,具有光学图像稳定功能和快速自动对焦功能。它通常拍摄12.5MP的照片,因为每个4个像素被组合成一个更明亮的像素,但也可以根据要求创建全分辨率的照片。

用主摄像头拍摄的照片提供了良好的、生动的色彩表现,有很好的细节,但画面总体上还是可以更清晰一点。在周围环境中注意到云层中的轻微颗粒感。我们喜欢低光下的画质--图像清晰度大多不错,黑暗区域也被很好地提亮。

也有一个潜望镜相机,也有一个光学图像稳定器。我们的18倍变焦拍摄显示,用它可以达到相当令人印象深刻的效果。可以用1200万像素拍摄微距照片--该相机甚至提供2倍光学变焦,并捕捉到良好的、详细的超近距离图像。

4800万像素的广角摄像头可以拍摄出体面的照片,但你不应该把它们放大太多,以免细节表现明显下降。总的来说,vivo X Fold的相机设置非常灵活,可以用它拍出好照片。

主摄像头能以最高8K、30帧的速度录制视频。在高达1080p和30 fps的情况下,潜望镜相机和混合变焦的广角镜头也可以在录制过程中使用。在4K和60帧的情况下,只有广角镜头可以使用。即使在光线不足的情况下,图片也很体面,自动对焦也做得非常好。

两个前置摄像头的视场略有不同,也来自两个不同的制造商,即海力士和三星。外侧的自拍相机画出的细节相当柔和,而内侧的自拍相机则是锐利的。一般来说,两个摄像头都能拍出好的自拍。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera BlumeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low LightWeitwinkelkamera
click to load images
18倍变焦
18倍变焦
主摄像头样本
ColorChecker
9.8 ∆E
9 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
8 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Vivo X Fold: 7.96 ∆E min: 2.84 - max: 14.47 ∆E
ColorChecker
7.2 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
10 ∆E
ColorChecker Vivo X Fold: 5.45 ∆E min: 1.25 - max: 11.54 ∆E

显示。双屏幕的乐趣

子像素记录
子像素记录
正面显示器的亮度值
正面显示器的亮度值

由于其设计,vivo X Fold配备了两个显示屏。前面是一个AMOLED屏幕,分辨率为2120×1080像素,采用21:9格式。该屏幕可以以120赫兹的速度刷新,从而实现了流畅的滚动体验。

不过,更令人兴奋的是可折叠的主显示屏,长宽比为9:8,分辨率为2160 x 1,916像素。这也是一个120赫兹的AMOLED屏幕。vivo已经设法使屏幕中央的折痕保持微妙,所以只有在屏幕上有反光的时候才真正可见。同时,该显示屏具有相当好的抗反射性能。

这种格式对于文件和网站来说非常实用。然而,除了老式的4:3电影,你几乎无法从大显示屏中获得任何东西,因为16:9的内容几乎无法比传统长宽比的手机显示得更大。

亮度传感器在我们的测试中被证明是非常有问题的,即使在非常强烈的环境光线下,似乎也不愿意将亮度设置为满。在730cd/m²的情况下,vivo X Fold的亮度达不到vivo X Note的水平。 vivo X Note.然而,这款手机的色彩还原是相当准确的。

703
cd/m²
710
cd/m²
715
cd/m²
729
cd/m²
730
cd/m²
732
cd/m²
733
cd/m²
742
cd/m²
719
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Illumination X Fold Inner Display
Maximum: 742 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 723.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 730 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.66 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.3
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
Vivo X Fold
AMOLED, 2160x1916, 8.03
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Dynamic AMOLED, 2208x1768, 7.60
Vivo X Note
AMOLED, 3080x1440, 7.00
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
AMOLED, 2688x1892, 8.30
Response Times
-191%
59%
-32%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
1.8
10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2)
-478%
1.09 ?(0.5585, 0.5345)
39%
2.8 ?(1.6, 1.2)
-56%
Response Time Black / White *
0.8
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
-200%
1.28 ?(0.7145, 0.569)
-60%
2.8 ?(1.6, 1.2)
-250%
PWM Frequency
120
245.1 ?(100)
104%
359.1
199%
373.1
211%
Screen
-25%
29%
-46%
Brightness middle
730
808
11%
997
37%
663
-9%
Brightness
724
820
13%
1005
39%
661
-9%
Brightness Distribution
95
97
2%
96
1%
98
3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.66
2.9
-75%
0.7
58%
3.5
-111%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.92
4.2
-44%
2.2
25%
5.3
-82%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.6
2.5
-56%
1.4
12%
2.7
-69%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.01 109%
2.22 99%
1.93 114%
CCT
6395 102%
6359 102%
6528 100%
6503 100%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-108% / -80%
44% / 39%
-39% / -41%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
0.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ ms rise
↘ ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ ms rise
↘ ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19959 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

亮度0
亮度0
亮度25%
亮度25%
亮度50%
亮度50%
亮度75%
亮度75%
亮度100%
亮度100%

具有固定变焦水平和不同亮度设置的测量系列

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命。vivo X Fold有很大的能量

凭借其 骁龙8代vivo X Fold使用了一个相当先进的高端芯片,并在我们的基准测试中取得了非常好的数据。即使打开多个应用程序,该系统仍然可以顺利使用。图形性能处于较高水平,也能在可折叠智能手机上进行游戏。

智能手机在负载下不会发热到让人不舒服,考虑到SoC的高废热,这是件好事。

安装在手机框架顶部和底部的立体声扬声器做得很好,也能感受到低音。声音可以更有力、更丰满一些,但扬声器总体上足以满足偶尔的音乐享受。向外部设备的音频输出是通过USB-C端口或通过蓝牙完成的。所有重要的aptX编解码器都支持。

电池可以通过电缆以最大66瓦的速度充电;充满电只需要不到40分钟。手机可以以50W的功率进行无线充电,那些想要的人还可以通过高达10W的反向无线充电为其他设备供电。

在电池寿命方面,由于双显示屏和大表面,你必须做出一些让步。然而,在我们的Wi-Fi测试中,vivo X Fold在亮度设置为150cd/m2的情况下,其4600毫安时的电池可以维持11:38小时。因此,这款手机应该能度过一个典型的工作日。

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core (sort by value)
Vivo X Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1232 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1135 Points ∼91% -8%
Vivo X Note
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1253 Points ∼100% +2%
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1198 Points ∼96% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1182 - 1298, n=20)
1234 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=269, last 2 years)
684 Points ∼55% -44%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Vivo X Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3600 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
3485 Points ∼95% -3%
Vivo X Note
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3661 Points ∼100% +2%
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3542 Points ∼97% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (3269 - 3839, n=20)
3554 Points ∼97% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=269, last 2 years)
2225 Points ∼61% -38%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Vivo X Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12100 Points ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
12103 Points ∼90% 0%
Vivo X Note
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12062 Points ∼90% 0%
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
13452 Points ∼100% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (10140 - 17025, n=20)
13251 Points ∼99% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 18567, n=173, last 2 years)
10212 Points ∼76% -16%
3DMark
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Vivo X Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2585 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1503 Points ∼58% -42%
Vivo X Note
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2577 Points ∼100% 0%
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1602 Points ∼62% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1629 - 2639, n=19)
2469 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 3080, n=163, last 2 years)
991 Points ∼38% -62%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Vivo X Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2496 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
997 Points ∼40% -60%
Vivo X Note
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2514 Points ∼100% +1%
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1564 Points ∼62% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1567 - 2585, n=20)
2403 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 2864, n=158, last 2 years)
980 Points ∼39% -61%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Vivo X Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
57 fps ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
32 fps ∼53% -44%
Vivo X Note
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
38 fps ∼63% -33%
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
60 fps ∼100% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (38 - 98, n=19)
59.7 fps ∼100% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.7 - 104, n=264, last 2 years)
29.4 fps ∼49% -48%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Vivo X Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
99 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
54 fps ∼55% -45%
Vivo X Note
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
81 fps ∼82% -18%
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
66 fps ∼67% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (60 - 131, n=21)
96.7 fps ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.9 - 136, n=265, last 2 years)
35.2 fps ∼36% -64%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Vivo X Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
39 fps ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
27 fps ∼59% -31%
Vivo X Note
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
35 fps ∼77% -10%
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
39 fps ∼86% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (27 - 69, n=19)
45.5 fps ∼100% +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3 - 69, n=265, last 2 years)
20.4 fps ∼45% -48%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Vivo X Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
39 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
22 fps ∼56% -44%
Vivo X Note
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
36 fps ∼92% -8%
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
28 fps ∼72% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (19 - 49, n=21)
38 fps ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 52, n=265, last 2 years)
13.4 fps ∼34% -66%
Vivo X FoldSamsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5GVivo X NoteMicrosoft Surface Duo 2Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-28%
1%
-15%
-17%
-52%
Sequential Read 256KB
1850.6
1934
5%
1873.54
1%
1818
-2%
1774 ?(1330 - 2037, n=53)
-4%
947 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=262, last 2 years)
-49%
Sequential Write 256KB
1405
790
-44%
1439.88
2%
754
-46%
975 ?(452 - 1559, n=53)
-31%
502 ?(11.9 - 1485, n=262, last 2 years)
-64%
Random Read 4KB
293.4
215.5
-27%
292.73
0%
287.1
-2%
266 ?(181 - 345, n=53)
-9%
171.3 ?(13.5 - 345, n=262, last 2 years)
-42%
Random Write 4KB
358.1
195.7
-45%
358.43
0%
324.7
-9%
277 ?(197.5 - 458, n=54)
-23%
167.8 ?(30.3 - 475, n=263, last 2 years)
-53%

温度

Max. Load
 39.4 °C38.6 °C35.9 °C 
 33.4 °C33.4 °C31.7 °C 
 30.4 °C30.7 °C30.3 °C 
Maximum: 39.4 °C
Average: 33.8 °C
36.8 °C33.8 °C35.7 °C
35.9 °C34 °C35 °C
36.1 °C30 °C30.3 °C
Maximum: 36.1 °C
Average: 30.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.1 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.6 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.


热图背面
热图背面
热力图前线
热力图前线

扬声器

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.937.92534.534.63127.726.64028.531.45033.236.56326.327.38023.423.810022.534.412515.44216014.648.920012.35125013.352.631511.648.44007.557.350011.468.663015.271.480014.771100011.872.712501271.7160010.369.220009.369.4250010.870.6315014.773.1400014.369.2500014.967.563001565.5800015.460.11000016.8641250016.158.8160001755.3SPL25.981.8N0.751.8median 14.6median 65.5Delta28.435.227.621.721.718.627.721.725.53235.125.725.227.425.324.323.316.330.818.942.817.542.812.348.415.752.111.656.411.86112.461.811.666.912.572.713.169.512.56713.168.312.872.812.874.512.971.213.372.513.474.213.770.813.773.114.472.613.76725.283.30.755.5median 13.1median 671.511.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseVivo X FoldMicrosoft Surface Duo 2
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Vivo X Fold audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Microsoft Surface Duo 2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Average of class Smartphone
  (424 - 1953, n=270, last 2 years)
906 min ∼34% +30%
Vivo X Note
5000 mAh
852 min ∼32% +22%
Vivo X Fold
4600 mAh
698 min ∼26%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
4400 mAh
610 min ∼23% -13%
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
4449 mAh
438 min ∼17% -37%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
11h 38min

Pros

+ 真彩色AMOLED屏幕
+ 令人印象深刻的折叠技术
+ 丰富的系统性能
+ 灵活的摄像头
+ 快速的指纹传感器
+ 快速的WLAN

Cons

- 软件的翻译问题
- 亮度传感器有问题
- 没有WiFi 6E
- 沉重

评语。一个有趣的、具有异国情调的可折叠式

在审查中。vivo X Fold。测试设备由:
在审查中。vivo X Fold。测试设备由:
贸易深圳.com

vivo X Fold是一款成功的、非常高质量的可折叠手机,作为中国进口的手机,它有合适的LTE频段和无问题的谷歌支持,这一点很好。当然,你必须忍受5G支持的不确定性和软件中偶尔出现的语言障碍,但你也在购买一款在西方不容易买到的手机。

电池运行时间比传统手机短得多,但目前你必须接受可折叠手机的这种妥协。屏幕的亮度传感器造成了一些问题,但除此之外,这两块AMOLED都是非常高质量的,可以很好地校准以实现准确的色彩再现。相机可以拍摄非常体面的照片,尤其是以其灵活性取悦于人,其中还包括更大的变焦水平以及视频录制的混合变焦。

令人恼火的是,这款智能手机不支持Wi-Fi 6E,但除此之外,它拥有2022年高端手机所期望的一切。然而,网上略低于1,600欧元的价格相当高。

vivo X Fold是一款赏心悦目的可折叠手机,拥有灵活的相机系统,性能很好,对西方用户来说也有不错的软件。

如果你正在寻找一个便宜的替代品,并有一个不那么优雅的可折叠显示屏,你可以得到 微软Surface Duo 2在我们测试的时候,你可以在amazon.de上以低于1,000欧元的价格买到。.此外,还有 三星Galaxy Z Fold3现在在电子零售商,如notebooksbilliger.de,售价略低于1,150欧元。.也就是说,这两款智能手机都必须使用去年那一代的处理器。

价格和可用性

目前,vivo X Fold仅作为中国进口产品出售。在我们的租赁供应商tradingshenzhen.com你在测试时支付1597欧元,但你会得到全面的服务,如保修处理和帮助视频。

Vivo X Fold - 08/01/2022 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
86%
Keyboard
69 / 75 → 92%
Pointing Device
95%
Connectivity
50 / 70 → 72%
Weight
86%
Battery
89%
Display
90%
Games Performance
63 / 64 → 98%
Application Performance
85 / 86 → 99%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%
Audio
72 / 90 → 80%
Camera
75%
Average
81%
87%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > vivo X折叠式智能手机评论。这款折叠式手机的屏幕和摄像头都很灵活
Florian Schmitt, 2022-08- 6 (Update: 2022-08- 6)