Notebookcheck Logo

微软Surface Duo 2评论--伟大但仍不成熟的智能手机概念

让他们来吧! 通过Surface Duo 2,微软推出了其第二代可折叠手机。与前代产品相比,新的表面手机有许多改进。在这篇关于微软可折叠手机的评论中,我们将探讨为什么这些巧妙的进步仍然不太够。
5G Smartphone Foldable
微软Surface Duo 2智能机评测

通过Surface Duo 2,微软这个技术巨头对可折叠类别的解释仍然与智能手机行业的其余部分不同。不同于 Galaxy Z Fold3依靠可折叠的动态AMOLED显示屏,Duo 2基于两个 "传统的 "PixelSense触摸显示屏。

第二代 骁龙888智能手机后面有一个4K三摄像头,并支持5G。得益于4449毫安时的电池,Surface Duo 2应该可以撑过一整天,其配置包括8GB的内存和128GB、256GB或512GB的内部存储,建议零售价为1500美元起。

Microsoft Surface Duo 2 (Surface Duo Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 8 x 1.8 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 660
Memory
8 GB 
Display
8.30 inch 12.8:9, 2688 x 1892 pixel 396 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen , native pen support, AMOLED, Folded: 5.8 inch 1892x1344, 4:3, gorilla glass Victus, glossy: yes, HDR, 90 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 221 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, dual gyro, dual proximity, dual compass, OTG, Miracast, DisplayPort, eSIM
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B14/​B19/​B20/​B25/​B26/​B28/​B29/​B30/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B42/​B46/​B48/​B66/​B71), 5G (n1/​n2/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n20/​n25/​n28/​n38/​n41/​n66/​n71/​n77/​n78/​n79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 5.5 x 184.5 x 145.2
Battery
4449 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix (f/1.7, 27mm, 1.4µm) + 12 MP (2x optical zoom, f/2.4, 51mm, 1.0µm) + 12 MP (f/2.2, 13mm, 1.0µm); Camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/2.0, 24mm, 1.0µm)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Virtual, Charger, USB cable, Microsoft UI, 12 Months Warranty, Widevine L1, GNSS: GPS (L1), Galileo (E1), GLONASS, BeiDou, QZSS, SBAS, fanless
Weight
284 g
Price
1699 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Potential Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
84.3 %
02/2022
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
284 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash8.30"2688x1892
88.9 %
09/2021
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
271 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash7.60"2208x1768
82.6 %
03/2020
Huawei Mate Xs
Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16
300 g512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash8.00"2480x2200
89.2 %
08/2021
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
234 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.81"3200x1440
88.6 %
06/2022
OnePlus 9 Pro
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
197 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3216x1440

外壳 - 薄型微软手机

微软Surface Duo 2的黑曜石色和冰川色
微软Surface Duo 2的黑曜石色和冰川色

Surface Duo 2的外壳,除了熟悉的白色 "冰川 "设计外,现在还有深色的 "Obisidian",非常薄,有一种高级感。然而,保护弧形显示屏的塑料框架与其他高质量的印象并不协调。

虽然与上一代机型相比,PixelSense触摸显示屏的尺寸从5.6英寸增加到5.8英寸,但边框仍然相当大。至少,约78%的低效屏占比意味着这款双屏智能手机不必采用打孔相机或凹槽。

这款手机的内部以及外部都由康宁大猩猩玻璃Victus保护,重量为284克(约0.63磅)。虽然Duo 2看起来很坚固,但它既不防水也不防尘。在这个类别中, Galaxy Z Fold3领先于Surface智能手机,因为它有IPX8认证。

微软Surface Duo 2智能机评测
微软Surface Duo 2智能机评测
微软Surface Duo 2智能机评测

Size Comparison

184.5 mm 145.2 mm 5.5 mm 284 g164.3 mm 74.6 mm 8.38 mm 234 g161.3 mm 146.2 mm 11 mm 300 g163.2 mm 73.6 mm 8.7 mm 197 g158.2 mm 128.1 mm 6.4 mm 271 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - Surface Duo 2支持DisplayPort

微软Surface Duo 2 扫视栏
微软Surface Duo 2 扫视栏

Surface Duo 2可以通过设备底部边缘的Type-C端口充电,该端口支持USB 3.2 Gen.2,并通过OTG适配器支持外围设备。此外,微软智能手机能够使用DisplayPort标准通过HDMI适配器向外部显示器输出4K视频。但是,没有包括适当的支持DisplayPort的USB-C转HDMI电缆。在无线方面,Duo 2支持Chromecast和Miracast。由于微软的智能手机(自然)没有永远在线的显示屏,制造商在其第二代Duo系列中整合了一个通知栏,当手机折叠起来时可以看到。这使得弯曲的显示屏可以作为电池指示灯或通知用户来电和信息。不幸的是,目前不支持第三方应用程序,这严重限制了其使用。

软件--无Windows的微软智能手机

Duo 2配备的用户界面不是微软自己的操作系统Windows,而是基于Android 11,在本次审查时,安全补丁从2021年1月开始。关于雷德蒙技术公司计划在多长时间内用软件更新来支持其可折叠机,目前还没有官方信息。我们所知道的是,在2020年9月发布后,Duo 2的前身 Duo 2的前辈一直到最近还在运行Android 10。据报道,微软希望为其可折叠手机跳过Android 12的更新,转而专注于Android 12L,这是一个特别的Android ,是为可折叠手机和平板电脑量身定做的版本。

用户界面包括一些精心设计的功能,如应用组、双屏窗口选项和视觉上吸引人的Microsoft 365馈送。也就是说,该软件可以使用一些更多的优化,只有少数应用被优化为双屏使用。

微软Surface Duo 2智能机评测
微软Surface Duo 2智能机评测
微软Surface Duo 2智能机评测

通信和GNSS - 带有Wi-Fi 6的Surface Duo 2

对于通信模块,微软选择了蓝牙5.1和NFC。由于支持Wi-Fi 6网络和快速轴标准,Duo 2实现了非常快的传输速率,最高可达1700 Mbps。然而,与我们新的参考路由器华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000结合使用时,传输速率可以更加稳定。

在5G和几个Sub-6频率的基础上,Duo 2还支持总共26个LTE频段。由于支持的4G频率数量多,用户不仅能从国内的巨大覆盖范围中受益,而且在旅行中也能受益。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1368 (671min - 1409max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1190 (1121min - 1230max) MBit/s
OnePlus 9 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
680 (649min - 703max) MBit/s
Huawei Mate Xs
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
542 (479min - 631max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei Mate Xs
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
963 (471min - 1110max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
893 (428min - 917max) MBit/s
OnePlus 9 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
799 (635min - 854max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
779 (363min - 824max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (last 2 years)
376 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1032 (449min - 1423max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=205, last 2 years)
648 MBit/s -37%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1176 (380min - 1712max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=206, last 2 years)
683 MBit/s -42%
09018027036045054063072081090099010801170126013501440153016201710Tooltip
Microsoft Surface Duo 2; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1031 (449-1423)
Microsoft Surface Duo 2; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1176 (380-1712)
在户外的地理定位
在户外的地理定位
在室内的地理定位
在室内的地理定位

为了检验GPS的精度,我们带着Duo 2进行了一次短途旅行。在我们10公里(约6.2英里)的测试轨道结束时,智能手机的GPS模块与我们的Garmin Venu 2参考设备之间的差异只有30米。(~98.4英尺)。

地理定位并不总是完美无缺的,记录的部分轨迹与实际路线有偏差。总的来说,Duo 2仍然是导航任务的一个好选择。

Garmin Venu 2 vs. Surface Duo 2
Garmin Venu 2 vs. Surface Duo 2

电话和通话质量 - 带有eSIM的微软电话

微软Surface Duo 2智能机评测

通话质量有些差强人意。虽然通过带有回声和噪音抑制功能的双麦克风可以清晰地捕捉到声音,但我们必须非常大声地说话,才能让他们听到我们的声音。在我们的测试中,通过集成显示摄像头与Skype的视频通话只支持单屏模式。当使用两个屏幕时,视频传输是不可能的。

Surface手机的卡槽可以接受Nano SIM卡。此外,还支持eSIM。根据制造商的说法,两者可以并行使用,实现双卡功能。

摄像机--Surface Duo 2带三摄像头

照片模式
照片模式
纵向模式
纵向模式

在相机方面,微软做了很大的改变。前代产品根本没有后置摄像头模块,而Duo 2通过带有OIS的1200万像素长焦镜头支持2倍光学变焦,通过1600万像素超宽镜头支持超宽拍摄。不幸的是,由于缺乏细节,两者都无法产生令人信服的结果。

主摄像头也有1200万像素的分辨率和光学图像稳定功能。虽然日光下的图像质量很好,但锐利程度可以更高。有趣的是,右边的图像比左边的明显更清晰。说到色彩准确性,微软在软件方面还有一些工作要做--特别是在色彩平衡和绿色阴影方面。

用里面的1200万像素摄像头拍摄的照片在清晰度方面有些乏善可陈,尽管在日光下的动态范围和亮度都相当不错。

超宽镜头
超宽镜头
广角镜头
2倍变焦
10倍变焦(最大)
微软Surface Duo 2智能机评测
微软Surface Duo 2智能机评测

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

WeitwinkelWeitwinkelLow LightUltraweitwinkelZoom 5x
ColorChecker
23.2 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
28.6 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
11 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
7 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
15 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Microsoft Surface Duo 2: 12.07 ∆E min: 3.55 - max: 28.59 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
46.9 ∆E
38.9 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
42.7 ∆E
53.4 ∆E
47.9 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
31.2 ∆E
26.9 ∆E
52.8 ∆E
56.3 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
43.1 ∆E
21.2 ∆E
45.3 ∆E
35.5 ∆E
41.8 ∆E
52.9 ∆E
57.5 ∆E
46.2 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Microsoft Surface Duo 2: 39.35 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 57.49 ∆E

配件和保修 - 微软智能手机不含充电器

可选的Surface超薄笔2
可选的Surface超薄笔2

虽然Surface Duo 2没有配备23瓦的电源(可单独购买,建议零售价:45美元),但包括一条USB电缆和USB Type-C耳塞。Surface Slim Pen 2可以选择购买,建议零售价为130美元。

微软只提供12个月的保修,从购买时开始。用户可以选择购买名为Microsoft Complete for Surface的意外损坏和停机保护计划。

输入设备和操作 - Surface Duo 2无面部解锁功能

电容式PixelSense触摸屏反应准确,但对输入的反应并不总是可靠的。偶尔,我们的输入似乎在第一次尝试时就丢失了,我们怀疑这是由微软的软件暗示而不是硬件问题造成的。康宁大猩猩玻璃的滑行性能非常好。

屏幕的90-Hz刷新率通过更流畅的动画和滚动增强了用户体验。与新的Surface Pen 2及其触觉马达相结合,更快的刷新率可以让人舒适地书写和画图。虽然如此,但 Galaxy Z Fold3和它的S-Pen感觉反应更快、更灵敏。

电源按钮有一个集成的指纹传感器,具有很高的生物识别安全识别率。Duo 2不支持面部识别。

微软Surface Duo 2智能机评测
微软Surface Duo 2智能机评测
微软Surface Duo 2智能机评测

显示屏 - 带有OLED屏幕的微软智能手机

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

Duo 2的两块90Hz AMOLED显示屏的分辨率为1344 x 1892像素,长宽比为13:9,这在智能手机中是不常见的。这导致每个屏幕的像素密度约为400PPI。当打开时,Surface模型提供了一个8.3英寸的显示屏对角线,它被中间的铰链打断了。

制造商承诺的最大亮度为600尼特。在启用环境光传感器的自动亮度模式下,我们在纯白背景下测得的亮度略高于这个数字,最高为663尼特。同样,更现实的APL50测试的结果也不错,为814尼特。Surface智能手机使用194-373赫兹的高频率的脉宽调制(PWM)来控制亮度,最高可达30%。在更高的亮度水平下,我们测得的频率为90赫兹,尽管振幅图的波动要小得多。没有直流调光模式。

656
cd/m²
659
cd/m²
667
cd/m²
657
cd/m²
663
cd/m²
664
cd/m²
662
cd/m²
653
cd/m²
664
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 667 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 660.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.04 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 663 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 1.93
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
AMOLED, 2688x1892, 8.30
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Dynamic AMOLED, 2208x1768, 7.60
Huawei Mate Xs
OLED, 2480x2200, 8.00
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.81
OnePlus 9 Pro
AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.70
Screen
15%
-11%
33%
33%
Brightness middle
663
808
22%
417
-37%
891
34%
733
11%
Brightness
661
820
24%
418
-37%
888
34%
746
13%
Brightness Distribution
98
97
-1%
99
1%
99
1%
97
-1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.5
2.9
17%
2.6
26%
1.9
46%
0.95
73%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.3
4.2
21%
7.7
-45%
3.7
30%
2.01
62%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.7
2.5
7%
2
26%
1.3
52%
1.7
37%
Gamma
1.93 114%
2.01 109%
2.31 95%
2.3 96%
2.21 100%
CCT
6503 100%
6359 102%
6276 104%
6527 100%
6591 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 373.1 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 373.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 373.1 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

使用我们的分光光度计和CalMAN软件进行的分析显示,与sRGB色彩空间(配置文件:自然)相比,Duo 2的deltaE色彩偏差相当低--理想的范围是<3。同样,6503 K的色温几乎与理想的6500 K完全吻合。

色彩准确性(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:自然)。
色彩准确性(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:自然)。
灰度(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:自然)。
灰度(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:自然)。
色彩饱和度(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:自然)。
色彩饱和度(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:自然)。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

由于采用了OLED技术,可视角度非常好。即使在户外,Duo 2的有机屏幕也表现良好。

微软Surface Duo 2智能机评测
微软Surface Duo 2智能机评测
微软Surface Duo 2智能机评测
微软Surface Duo 2智能机评测

性能 - 采用高通SoC的微软手机

2021年高端高通芯片组使得Surface手机的性能非常好。虽然经常出现轻微的卡顿,但整体系统性能在大多数情况下是好的。

基准测试的结果是 骁龙888我们对UFS 3.1存储的快速读取和写入速度也感到满意。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1198 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1135 Points -5%
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
766 Points -36%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
989 Points -17%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1129 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (976 - 1198, n=27)
1118 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=214, last 2 years)
900 Points -25%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3542 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
3485 Points -2%
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
2972 Points -16%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
3462 Points -2%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
3666 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3204 - 3810, n=27)
3571 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=214, last 2 years)
2947 Points -17%
Vulkan Score (sort by value)
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4234 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4362 Points +3%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4287 Points +1%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4544 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3894 - 6176, n=26)
4711 Points +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (79 - 15910, n=90, last 2 years)
4248 Points 0%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4765 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4663 Points -2%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4599 Points -3%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4604 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3100 - 4786, n=26)
4617 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (434 - 13654, n=82, last 2 years)
4036 Points -15%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
13452 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
12103 Points -10%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
13982 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (11435 - 17085, n=21)
14307 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=209, last 2 years)
11643 Points -13%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
8055 Points
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4076 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (7991 - 9221, n=3)
8422 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (712 - 7285, n=52, last 2 years)
3548 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
10261 Points
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4044 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (10111 - 13263, n=3)
11212 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (618 - 9451, n=52, last 2 years)
3905 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4597 Points
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4192 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (4462 - 4609, n=3)
4556 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (1093 - 4525, n=52, last 2 years)
3005 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
11527 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
8257 Points -28%
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4213 Points -63%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
8562 Points -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (8065 - 11534, n=20)
10135 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (704 - 23024, n=115, last 2 years)
9038 Points -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
16253 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
10491 Points -35%
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4064 Points -75%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
11227 Points -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (10491 - 17179, n=20)
15130 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 45492, n=114, last 2 years)
15757 Points -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5374 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4731 Points -12%
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4836 Points -10%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4676 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (2975 - 5434, n=20)
4760 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=114, last 2 years)
4335 Points -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
6140 Points
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5689 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (6140 - 7596, n=2)
6868 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 7890, n=104, last 2 years)
2680 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
6816 Points
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6265 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (6816 - 9436, n=2)
8126 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 9814, n=104, last 2 years)
2667 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4557 Points
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4305 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (4514 - 4557, n=2)
4536 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 4679, n=104, last 2 years)
3126 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
7454 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
8804 Points +18%
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4422 Points -41%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
8347 Points +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (6110 - 9839, n=21)
8532 Points +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=177, last 2 years)
6571 Points -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
9863 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
11775 Points +19%
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5672 Points -42%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
11050 Points +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (7930 - 12914, n=21)
11629 Points +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=176, last 2 years)
9383 Points -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3987 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4675 Points +17%
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
2497 Points -37%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4497 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (2579 - 5366, n=21)
4511 Points +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (938 - 8480, n=176, last 2 years)
4169 Points +5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3948 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (365 - 6439, n=98, last 2 years)
2606 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4046 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 8601, n=98, last 2 years)
2765 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3638 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (1667 - 3525, n=98, last 2 years)
2671 Points
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5345 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5381 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5689 Points +6%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5736 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3958 - 5942, n=26)
5674 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (395 - 9839, n=132, last 2 years)
2528 Points -53%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5238 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4418 Points -16%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5734 Points +9%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5737 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3959 - 5925, n=26)
5617 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (394 - 20068, n=197, last 2 years)
6135 Points +17%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1602 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1503 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1552 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (1236 - 1602, n=21)
1516 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 5226, n=202, last 2 years)
1647 Points +3%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1564 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
997 Points -36%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1498 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (974 - 1564, n=21)
1421 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (110 - 5248, n=197, last 2 years)
1656 Points +6%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
90 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
112 fps +24%
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
58 fps -36%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
120 fps +33%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
60 fps -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (60 - 143, n=20)
102.5 fps +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 165, n=180, last 2 years)
83.1 fps -8%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
243 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
173 fps -29%
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
139 fps -43%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
281 fps +16%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
258 fps +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (173 - 294, n=20)
247 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (19 - 791, n=180, last 2 years)
243 fps 0%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
90 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
73 fps -19%
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
47 fps -48%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
98 fps +9%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
60 fps -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (55 - 121, n=20)
93.9 fps +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.8 - 165, n=181, last 2 years)
70.8 fps -21%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
132 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
108 fps -18%
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
81 fps -39%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
177 fps +34%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
151 fps +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (101 - 180, n=20)
141.7 fps +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.2 - 363, n=181, last 2 years)
137.8 fps +4%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
71 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
44 fps -38%
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
26 fps -63%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
62 fps -13%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
57 fps -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (36 - 105, n=20)
71.5 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 158, n=181, last 2 years)
59.7 fps -16%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
90 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
75 fps -17%
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
51 fps -43%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
121 fps +34%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
69 fps -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (69 - 126, n=20)
98.9 fps +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.2 - 279, n=181, last 2 years)
97.1 fps +8%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
61 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
26 fps -57%
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
17 fps -72%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
35 fps -43%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
36 fps -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (26 - 61, n=20)
47.2 fps -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 117, n=181, last 2 years)
42.7 fps -30%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
66 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
44 fps -33%
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
32 fps -52%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
71 fps +8%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
59 fps -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (42 - 74, n=20)
60.6 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.9 - 166, n=181, last 2 years)
58.6 fps -11%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
60 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
32 fps -47%
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
44 fps -27%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
55 fps -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (32 - 73, n=26)
55.7 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=221, last 2 years)
43.1 fps -28%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
66 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
54 fps -18%
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
165 fps +150%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
85 fps +29%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
63 fps -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (46 - 87, n=27)
70.4 fps +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 229, n=221, last 2 years)
63.1 fps -4%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
39 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
27 fps -31%
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
46 fps +18%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
26 fps -33%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
42 fps +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (25 - 51, n=26)
38.5 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.8 - 105, n=221, last 2 years)
32.1 fps -18%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
28 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
22 fps -21%
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
68 fps +143%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
30 fps +7%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
28 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (19 - 32, n=26)
27.5 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 94, n=221, last 2 years)
25.1 fps -10%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
772608 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
714178 Points -8%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
801983 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (636471 - 824694, n=17)
767997 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=151, last 2 years)
738649 Points -4%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
248961 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
254430 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
262983 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (171404 - 264766, n=15)
243759 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1043 - 139804, n=54, last 2 years)
20600 Points -92%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
6342 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
6252 Points -1%
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4640 Points -27%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
6365 Points 0%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
6959 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (5839 - 6985, n=20)
6495 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=162, last 2 years)
5686 Points -10%
System (sort by value)
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
9786 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
10837 Points +11%
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
8823 Points -10%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
9696 Points -1%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
11774 Points +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (9119 - 11774, n=20)
10766 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=162, last 2 years)
9595 Points -2%
Memory (sort by value)
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
7911 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
6933 Points -12%
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6453 Points -18%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
7453 Points -6%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
9044 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (5352 - 9044, n=20)
7316 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12306, n=162, last 2 years)
6206 Points -22%
Graphics (sort by value)
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
13654 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
13750 Points +1%
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
8570 Points -37%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
12776 Points -6%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
13463 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (9399 - 15739, n=20)
13676 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=162, last 2 years)
13856 Points +1%
Web (sort by value)
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1545 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1479 Points -4%
Huawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
950 Points -39%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1782 Points +15%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1633 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (1434 - 1983, n=20)
1683 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=162, last 2 years)
1487 Points -4%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 (Chrome 97)
222.8 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (77 - 223, n=19)
168.8 Points -24%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra (Chrome91)
160.9 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G (Chrome 92)
151.1 Points -32%
OnePlus 9 Pro (Microsoft Edge 46)
124.5 Points -44%
Huawei Mate Xs (Huawei Browser 10.1)
103.6 Points -54%
Average of class Smartphone (66.1 - 104.3, n=2, last 2 years)
85.2 Points -62%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 (Chrome 97)
161 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G (Chrome 92)
156 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (103 - 182, n=18)
143.1 Points -11%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra (Chrome91)
141 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone (37 - 304, n=119, last 2 years)
131 Points -19%
OnePlus 9 Pro (Microsoft Edge 4689)
103 Points -36%
Huawei Mate Xs (Huawei Browser 10.1)
98 Points -39%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
47543 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (23491 - 47543, n=20)
35591 Points -25%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra (Chrome91)
33423 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G (Chrome 92)
33404 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=205, last 2 years)
33314 Points -30%
OnePlus 9 Pro (Microsoft Edge 46)
26829 Points -44%
Huawei Mate Xs (Huawei Browser 10.1)
20917 Points -56%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Huawei Mate Xs (Huawei Browser 10.1)
2219 ms * -149%
OnePlus 9 Pro (Microsoft Edge 46)
1808 ms * -103%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra (Chrome91)
1782 ms * -100%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=168, last 2 years)
1658 ms * -86%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (891 - 1841, n=20)
1319 ms * -48%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G (Chrome 92)
959 ms * -8%
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 (Chrome 97)
891 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Microsoft Surface Duo 2Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5GHuawei Mate XsXiaomi Mi 11 UltraOnePlus 9 ProAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-14%
-25%
-1%
-5%
11%
-2%
Sequential Read 256KB
1818
1934
6%
1767
-3%
1928
6%
1995
10%
1768 ?(1004 - 2037, n=86)
-3%
1471 ?(215 - 4512, n=213, last 2 years)
-19%
Sequential Write 256KB
754
790
5%
402.7
-47%
756
0%
769
2%
1136 ?(452 - 1873, n=86)
51%
1084 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=213, last 2 years)
44%
Random Read 4KB
287.1
215.5
-25%
202.9
-29%
259.3
-10%
258.7
-10%
281 ?(173.5 - 543, n=86)
-2%
243 ?(22.2 - 543, n=213, last 2 years)
-15%
Random Write 4KB
324.7
195.7
-40%
259.1
-20%
329.7
2%
254.3
-22%
311 ?(197.5 - 499, n=87)
-4%
267 ?(13 - 709, n=213, last 2 years)
-18%

游戏--有游戏愿望的Surface Duo 2

我们用Play Store的几款游戏测试Duo 2的3D性能。Armajet PUBG Mobile不支持第二个显示屏。这两款游戏在一致的帧率和最高设置下仍能顺利运行。此外,《PUBG Mobile》可以在UltraHD下运行,而不会明显影响帧率。

排放--Surface Duo 2几乎保持凉爽

温度

热量发展几乎没有穿透外壳,尽管它是相当异质的。与其他Snapdragon 888手机一样,我们能够测量性能节流。在3DMark压力测试中,Duo 2的性能下降了约30%。

Max. Load
 27.4 °C38.8 °C39 °C 
 28.7 °C36.6 °C38.8 °C 
 28.4 °C29.7 °C37.2 °C 
Maximum: 39 °C
Average: 33.8 °C
38 °C38.1 °C28.3 °C
37.4 °C39.4 °C28.2 °C
36.1 °C36.6 °C28.5 °C
Maximum: 39.4 °C
Average: 34.5 °C
Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
92.5 (5288min) % +35%
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68.3 (23.8min) %
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61.8 (19.2min) % -10%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60.3 (3461min) % -12%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
93.5 (1404min) % +31%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78.1 (5.07min) % +10%
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71.3 (6.58min) %
051015202530Tooltip
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø7.24 (6.58-9.23)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø5.17 (5.07-6.49)
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø25.3 (23.8-34.8)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø20.4 (19.2-31)
微软Surface Duo 2 智能手机
微软Surface Duo 2 智能手机

发言人

Surface智能手机的立体声扬声器能够达到83分贝的最大音量水平,并提供体面的声音。中频可以更加平衡,而且缺乏低音。

有线耳机可以通过USB-C端口连接到Duo 2上。另外,由于蓝牙5.1的存在,也支持无线耳机。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.227.62521.721.73118.627.74021.725.5503235.16325.725.28027.425.310024.323.312516.330.816018.942.820017.542.825012.348.431515.752.140011.656.450011.86163012.461.880011.666.9100012.572.7125013.169.5160012.567200013.168.3250012.872.8315012.874.5400012.971.2500013.372.5630013.474.2800013.770.81000013.773.11250014.472.61600013.767SPL25.283.3N0.755.5median 13.1median 67Delta1.510.535.831.532.237.125.123.6212434.435.22426.228.924.222.829.817.640.219.254.415.856.215.55915.762.31363.912.469.614.468.314.771.712.876.914.676.413.573.813.176.613.574.613.477.913.381.413.379.413.475.213.774.313.27613.270.312.265.125.988.70.776.7median 13.5median 73.80.97.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMicrosoft Surface Duo 2Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命--微软智能手机配备4449毫安时双电池

能源消耗

4449毫安时的双电池可以在高达23瓦的功率下充电。不支持无线充电,空闲时的耗电量有些高。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.21 / 0.38 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.55 / 2.43 / 2.52 Watt
Load midlight 6.7 / 8.74 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
4449 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
4400 mAh
Huawei Mate Xs
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
5000 mAh
OnePlus 9 Pro
4500 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
34%
-25%
20%
0%
21%
28%
Idle Minimum *
1.55
1.02
34%
2.22
-43%
1.13
27%
1.6
-3%
1.066 ?(0.46 - 1.8, n=23)
31%
0.896 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=159, last 2 years)
42%
Idle Average *
2.43
1.18
51%
3.94
-62%
1.67
31%
2
18%
1.58 ?(0.74 - 2.6, n=23)
35%
1.449 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=159, last 2 years)
40%
Idle Maximum *
2.52
1.27
50%
4.01
-59%
1.69
33%
2.4
5%
1.733 ?(0.78 - 3.1, n=23)
31%
1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=159, last 2 years)
35%
Load Average *
6.7
5.25
22%
4.34
35%
5.17
23%
6.2
7%
5.46 ?(3.87 - 6.7, n=23)
19%
5.51 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=159, last 2 years)
18%
Load Maximum *
8.74
7.74
11%
8.46
3%
9.9
-13%
11
-26%
9.79 ?(5.89 - 11.7, n=23)
-12%
8.19 ?(4.32 - 20.8, n=159, last 2 years)
6%

* ... smaller is better

Power Draw: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G: Ø5.62 (1.47-10.6)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G: Ø5.36 (1.088-10.3)

Power Draw: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011121314Tooltip
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.17 (7.63-9.71)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.02 (5.69-14.6)
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.01 (1.412-2.27)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.944 (0.899-1.151)

电池寿命

在双屏模式下,Duo 2的运行时间并不理想,在我们的Wi-Fi电池测试中,调整后的显示亮度为150尼特,其电池寿命仅有7小时,相当平庸。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
7h 18min
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
4449 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
4400 mAh
Huawei Mate Xs
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
5000 mAh
OnePlus 9 Pro
4500 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
438
610
39%
481
10%
650
48%
1002
129%

Pros

+ 制造质量和触觉效果
+ 伟大的概念
+ 良好的90-Hz OLED面板
+ 快速的指纹识别传感器
+ 快速的性能
+ 支持DisplayPort

Cons

- 缺乏高级功能
- 软件
- 厚重的边框
- 摄像头(超广角、长焦)。
- 不包括充电器和手写笔

结论 - 微软Surface Duo 2

审查中。微软Surface Duo 2.测试设备由微软德国提供
审查中。微软Surface Duo 2.测试设备由微软德国提供

微软的Surface Duo 2是对可折叠智能手机的不同诠释,例如,三星的Fold系列。Duo 2有一个优雅而又坚固的外观。使用这款双屏手机,同时使用两个应用程序要比使用双屏手机容易得多。 Galaxy Z Fold3.然而,如果你不需要这种功能,Duo 2很可能不是你的智能手机,因为与它的竞争对手相比,第二代产品仍有明显的妥协。 可折叠的竞争对手.

这包括厚厚的边框,硬件限制(没有IP等级,没有Qi,没有SD卡插槽,......),以及未经打磨的软件。同样,新的、设计非常优雅的通知栏也太小了。最后,只有一年的保修期对于一款专注于生产力的智能手机来说并不合适。

我们希望微软将继续长期追求其智能手机业务。不幸的是,第二代产品仍然没有提供足够精良的用户体验。

价格和可用性

微软Surface Duo 2目前在网上零售商,如Amazon.com,售价约1499美元起。.

Microsoft Surface Duo 2 - 08/30/2022 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 90%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
66 / 70 → 94%
Weight
87%
Battery
76%
Display
90%
Games Performance
65 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
88 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
77 / 90 → 85%
Camera
66%
Average
81%
84%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 微软Surface Duo 2评论--伟大但仍不成熟的智能手机概念
Marcus Herbrich, 2022-02- 6 (Update: 2022-02- 6)