Notebookcheck Logo

vivo X Note评论。巨大的智能手机,拥有所有的拉链和密封圈

7英寸的畸形物。 vivo X Note是一款成熟的旗舰智能手机,想用各种高端规格来说服人。其核心是巨大的7.0英寸AMOLED显示屏和一个多功能的四摄像头。该设备几乎没有留下任何瑕疵。一个直接的打击?让我们拭目以待。
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen
Vivo X Note (X Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio
Graphics adapter
Memory
12288 MB 
, LPDDR5
Display
7.00 inch 19.25:9, 3080 x 1440 pixel 486 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 512 GB 
, 480.37 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (850, 1900, 2100 MHz) LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.75 x 168.8 x 80.3
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Samsung GN1, f/1.6, 1/1.31", 1.2 µm) + 8 MPix (OmniVision OV08A10, 5x optical zoom, f/3.4, 125 mm) + 12 MPix (IMX663, 2x optical zoom, f/2.0, 47 mm, 1/2.93", 1.2 µm) + 48 MPix (IMX598, f/2.2, 14 mm, 1/2.0", 0.8 µm); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.5)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, 80W-Charger, Case, USB-Cabel (Type-C), SIM-Tool, SIM-Tool, Headset, Origin OS, 12 Months Warranty, SAR: not specified; DRM Widevine L1; GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1, E5a), BeiDou (B1, B1C, B2a), fanless, waterproof
Weight
221 g, Power Supply: 159 g
Price
900 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
87.3 %
07/2022
Vivo X Note
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
221 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash7.00"3080x1440
89.3 %
03/2022
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920
228 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"3088x1440
89 %
04/2022
Oppo Find X5 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
221 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3216x1440
87.4 %
02/2022
Xiaomi 12 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
204 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.73"3200x1440

外壳和设备。Vivo X Note,带USB 3.2和红外辐射器

vivo X Note看起来真的很大,但它比预期的要轻,只有221克,并配备了5000毫安时的电池。不过,它肯定不是一个轻巧的设备。我们的蓝色测试模型有一个哑光铝框和一个类似皮革的背面纹理。它看起来相当别致,并提供了一个对指纹不敏感的良好握力。黑色和灰色的版本也有。

做工非常好。Vivo X Note智能手机的特点是缝隙紧密而均匀,具有较高的扭转刚度。然而,当智能手机来回弯曲时,有一些可听到的噼啪声,这是可以感知的。得益于IP68等级的保护,外壳可以防止灰尘和水的侵入。

功能方面几乎没有什么需要改进的地方。USB 3.2端口不仅允许快速数据传输和OTG,而且还允许有线图像输出。然而,显示内容只能在外部显示器上进行镜像,工作起来并不顺利。此外,还有一个用于控制多媒体设备、相机和空调的红外辐射器。由于有巨大的内部存储器,缺乏内存扩展的问题当然可以应对。一个物理静音按钮也位于左长边。

尺寸比较

168.8 mm 80.3 mm 8.75 mm 221 g163.6 mm 74.6 mm 8.66 mm 204 g163.3 mm 77.9 mm 8.9 mm 228 g163.7 mm 73.9 mm 8.5 mm 221 g

通信、软件和操作。一切都在其中,但没有Wi-Fi 6E

vivo X Note的通信设备基本上是全功能的。Wi-Fi模块支持带有VHT80的Wi-Fi 6,但在与我们参考的华硕ROG Rapture AXE11000路由器结合发送数据时,它略微变弱。然而,这在日常使用中不会被注意到,因为传输速度仍然很高。

移动互联网的频率范围很广,即使我们的测试设备是从中国进口的,也没有留下任何需要改进的地方。这同时适用于LTE和5G。如果插入德国SIM卡,系统会抱怨它不是来自 "中国大陆",而且5G可能有限制。我们无法确定这些。在测试中,智能手机连接到5G网络没有问题,传输率也达到了预期水平。

电话功能也是令人信服的。支持VoLTE和Wi-Fi通话。vivo X Note还可以容纳两张nano-SIM卡。当放在耳边时,X Note提供了良好的语音质量,也抑制了大部分环境噪音;在扬声器模式下会有一点回响。电话也可以直接通过通话应用程序进行录音。

操作系统是Android 12,由vivo自己的Origin OS覆盖。在审查时,安全补丁在2022年6月1日已经更新。然而,目前还不清楚vivo X Note的更新会支持多久。虽然它是一款进口设备,但也可以选择德语作为系统语言。翻译在某些地方有点颠簸,但基本上是成功的。

vivo X Note的电容式触摸屏在所有区域都能非常可靠地工作,并能精确地实现输入。出厂时已经贴上了配套的屏幕保护膜,提供了不错的滑行性能。

大型3D超声波指纹传感器确保了生物识别安全。只需一次触摸,设置就会快如闪电,而且非常可靠。识别区域比传统智能手机大得多。个别应用程序甚至可以用双指认证来保护,在这种情况下,传感器会同时检查两个不同的手指。此外,还可以通过前置摄像头进行面部识别。

Networking
Vivo X Note
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
717 (min: 540) MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
857 (min: 831) MBit/s ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
521 (min: 311) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
716 (min: 539) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1704 (min: 852) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1702 (min: 1642) MBit/s ∼100%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
890 (min: 433) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
820 (min: 799) MBit/s ∼56%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1214 (min: 516) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1465 (min: 1307) MBit/s ∼100%
0801602403204004805606407208008809601040112012001280136014401520Tooltip
Vivo X Note Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø855 (831-878)
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1463 (1307-1536)
Vivo X Note Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø717 (540-788)
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1197 (516-1524)

照相机。vivo X Note的四种光学器件

与vivo X Note的自拍
与vivo X Note的自拍

Vivo X Note的自拍令人印象深刻。一系列的滤镜和美颜模式可用于此。然而,前置摄像头只能录制全高清30帧的视频。

背面的四摄像头提供了广泛的应用。除了5000万像素的主传感器,还安装了一个超广角,和两个变焦镜头。vivo称2倍光学放大镜为人像镜头,潜望镜相机甚至可以实现5倍光学放大。在数字方面,60倍的变焦是可能的。照片有一个可敬的动态范围,并以高对比度呈现。只有在弱光下才会丢失一些细节。此外,在超广角下可以看到轻微的畸变。

视频可以用8K录制,但在这种模式下不能使用稳定功能。超高清60帧以下的情况就不同了,而那些对全高清30帧满意的人可以利用更强大的超和360度稳定。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light
click to load images
ColorChecker
17.4 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
20.1 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
6 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
8 ∆E
14 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Vivo X Note: 9.25 ∆E min: 1.83 - max: 20.08 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.1 ∆E
52.6 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
44.9 ∆E
60.7 ∆E
51 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
41.2 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
63.4 ∆E
62 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
47.1 ∆E
35.8 ∆E
72.6 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
41.5 ∆E
73.2 ∆E
68.3 ∆E
51 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Vivo X Note: 45 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 73.19 ∆E

显示屏。超亮的LTPO AMOLED,频率高达120 Hz

子像素结构
子像素结构

vivo X Note的7.0英寸LTPO OLED面板以QHD+分辨率工作,也可以降低。刷新率可由系统自动调整,在1至120赫兹之间工作。固定的60赫兹或120赫兹刷新率可以手动设置。

启用环境光传感器后,亮度非常高,在APL18测量中甚至达到了1,360cd/m²的峰值。那些喜欢手动调节亮度的人有497 cd/m²可供他们使用。

像大多数OLED一样,vivo智能手机的也会闪动。我们测量了最低显示亮度的频率在182.3Hz和359.1Hz之间。虽然可以通过开发者选项启用直流调光模式,但在控制测量中没有显示任何效果。因此,对PWM敏感的用户可能会因为长时间观看而遇到一些不便。

995
cd/m²
1005
cd/m²
1014
cd/m²
988
cd/m²
997
cd/m²
1032
cd/m²
991
cd/m²
1000
cd/m²
1023
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1032 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1005 cd/m² Minimum: 2.59 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 997 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.7 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.3
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
98.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Vivo X Note
AMOLED, 3080x1440, 7.00
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Dynamic AMOLED, 3088x1440, 6.80
Oppo Find X5 Pro
AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.70
Xiaomi 12 Pro
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.73
Response Times
-21%
9%
-216%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
1.09 ?(0.5585, 0.5345)
0.872 ?(0.448, 0.424)
20%
0.711 ?(0.364, 0.348)
35%
7.2 ?(3.6, 3.6)
-561%
Response Time Black / White *
1.28 ?(0.7145, 0.569)
1.501 ?(0.7, 0.801)
-17%
1.389 ?(0.793, 0.597)
-9%
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
-88%
PWM Frequency
359.1
120
-67%
361
1%
367.6
2%
Screen
-6%
-11%
-24%
Brightness middle
997
1077
8%
746
-25%
959
-4%
Brightness
1005
1093
9%
744
-26%
977
-3%
Brightness Distribution
96
97
1%
97
1%
96
0%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.7
1.2
-71%
0.9
-29%
1.1
-57%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.2
2
9%
1.6
27%
3.1
-41%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.4
1.3
7%
1.6
-14%
1.9
-36%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.37 93%
2.23 99%
2.22 99%
CCT
6528 100%
6526 100%
6499 100%
6498 100%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-14% / -11%
-1% / -4%
-120% / -88%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.7145 ms rise
↘ 0.569 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.09 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5585 ms rise
↘ 0.5345 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 359.1 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 359.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 359.1 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19959 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最小面板亮度
分钟。
25 % 面板亮度
25 %
50 % 面板亮度
50 %
75 % 面板亮度
75 %
最大的手动面板亮度
100 %

具有固定变焦水平和不同亮度设置的测量系列

灰度(配置文件:专业,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(配置文件:专业,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(配置文件:专业,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(配置文件:专业,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:专业,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:专业,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(配置文件:专业,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(配置文件:专业,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
在户外
在户外
视角稳定
视角稳定

性能、排放和电池寿命

vivo X Note搭载的是 骁龙8代1配备12GB LPDDR5工作内存。图形计算由集成的阿德雷诺730.因此,这款智能手机依靠的是一个尖端和强大的平台,也非常适合游戏。

vivo智能手机在基准测试中表现良好,并将自己定位在预期范围内。安装的冷却解决方案也相对较好,因为X Note在长期的性能中取得了比其他对手更高的帧率,并且不会像其他对手那样扼杀SoC。尽管这样,它甚至不会有温暖的触感。

两个扬声器可以非常强大,但它们没有得到最佳的调整。在中等音量范围内,声音是相当吸引人的,尽管低频和超高频的音调有些缺乏。特别是在后者中,这一点会有负面的反映。声音可以通过USB-C和蓝牙输出--大多数重要的音频编解码器(SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、LDAC)都可以无线使用。

在电池运行时间方面,vivo X Note以其5000毫安时的电池在比较领域中名列前茅。由于运行时间超过14小时,应该有足够的电量供一天使用。否则,该智能手机可以用附带的80W充电器快速充电。

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core (sort by value)
Vivo X Note
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1253 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1154 Points ∼92% -8%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1257 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1192 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1182 - 1298, n=20)
1234 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=271, last 2 years)
683 Points ∼54% -45%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Vivo X Note
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3661 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
3560 Points ∼95% -3%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3488 Points ∼93% -5%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3738 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (3269 - 3839, n=20)
3554 Points ∼95% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=271, last 2 years)
2223 Points ∼59% -39%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Vivo X Note
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12062 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
12579 Points ∼95% +4%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12144 Points ∼92% +1%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13131 Points ∼99% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (10140 - 17025, n=20)
13251 Points ∼100% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 18567, n=172, last 2 years)
10218 Points ∼77% -15%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Vivo X Note
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12813 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
10415 Points ∼81% -19%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12123 Points ∼95% -5%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10958 Points ∼86% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (6784 - 13121, n=16)
10944 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 13341, n=233, last 2 years)
5077 Points ∼40% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Vivo X Note
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
25761 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
18689 Points ∼73% -27%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
25285 Points ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
20842 Points ∼81% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (15268 - 26049, n=16)
22492 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 31940, n=233, last 2 years)
7267 Points ∼28% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Vivo X Note
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4644 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
4085 Points ∼88% -12%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4296 Points ∼93% -7%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4120 Points ∼89% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (2237 - 4811, n=16)
3963 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (651 - 6394, n=231, last 2 years)
3270 Points ∼70% -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Vivo X Note
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
11035 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
8612 Points ∼78% -22%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10005 Points ∼91% -9%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
9149 Points ∼83% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (5983 - 11528, n=15)
9646 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 11909, n=246, last 2 years)
4090 Points ∼37% -63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Vivo X Note
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
18620 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
12972 Points ∼70% -30%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
18090 Points ∼97% -3%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13950 Points ∼75% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (11082 - 19392, n=15)
16543 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 20955, n=246, last 2 years)
5217 Points ∼28% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Vivo X Note
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4549 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
3957 Points ∼87% -13%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3902 Points ∼86% -14%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4150 Points ∼91% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (2283 - 4771, n=15)
3962 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (635 - 5793, n=246, last 2 years)
3265 Points ∼72% -28%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Vivo X Note
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
9839 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
7236 Points ∼73% -26%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
9826 Points ∼99% 0%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
9927 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (6351 - 10062, n=13)
9150 Points ∼92% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (216 - 10062, n=201, last 2 years)
3101 Points ∼31% -68%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Vivo X Note
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10138 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
7288 Points ∼70% -28%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10175 Points ∼98% 0%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10384 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (6483 - 10412, n=19)
9626 Points ∼93% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (205 - 11700, n=206, last 2 years)
3420 Points ∼33% -66%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Vivo X Note
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2577 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
2044 Points ∼78% -21%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2575 Points ∼99% 0%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2609 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1629 - 2639, n=19)
2469 Points ∼95% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 3080, n=162, last 2 years)
996 Points ∼38% -61%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Vivo X Note
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2514 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1916 Points ∼76% -24%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2523 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2513 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1567 - 2585, n=20)
2403 Points ∼95% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 2864, n=157, last 2 years)
985 Points ∼39% -61%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Vivo X Note
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
38 fps ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
42 fps ∼70% +11%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
53 fps ∼89% +39%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
44 fps ∼74% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (38 - 98, n=19)
59.7 fps ∼100% +57%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 104, n=266, last 2 years)
29.4 fps ∼49% -23%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Vivo X Note
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
81 fps ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
68 fps ∼70% -16%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
94 fps ∼97% +16%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
92 fps ∼95% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (60 - 131, n=21)
96.7 fps ∼100% +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.9 - 136, n=267, last 2 years)
35.1 fps ∼36% -57%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Vivo X Note
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
35 fps ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
31 fps ∼68% -11%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
36 fps ∼79% +3%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
27 fps ∼59% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (27 - 69, n=19)
45.5 fps ∼100% +30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.1 - 69, n=267, last 2 years)
20.4 fps ∼45% -42%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Vivo X Note
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
36 fps ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
30 fps ∼75% -17%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
40 fps ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
34 fps ∼85% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (19 - 49, n=21)
38 fps ∼95% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 52, n=267, last 2 years)
13.4 fps ∼34% -63%
Vivo X NoteSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5GOppo Find X5 ProXiaomi 12 ProAverage 512 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-13%
-35%
6%
-12%
-52%
Sequential Read 256KB
1873.54
1653
-12%
1410
-25%
1620
-14%
1873 ?(1710 - 1999, n=14)
0%
948 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=264, last 2 years)
-49%
Sequential Write 256KB
1439.88
1074
-25%
894
-38%
1465
2%
941 ?(575 - 1484, n=14)
-35%
501 ?(11.9 - 1485, n=264, last 2 years)
-65%
Random Read 4KB
292.73
322.3
10%
183.7
-37%
324.9
11%
281 ?(208 - 323, n=14)
-4%
171.3 ?(13.5 - 345, n=264, last 2 years)
-41%
Random Write 4KB
358.43
273.1
-24%
210.4
-41%
448.9
25%
324 ?(221 - 475, n=14)
-10%
167.8 ?(30.3 - 475, n=265, last 2 years)
-53%

温度

051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Vivo X Note Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø13.9 (12.7-15.6)
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø10.9 (9.64-15.4)
Vivo X Note Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø50 (44.5-59.4)
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø41.7 (37.2-59.4)
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø43.7 (38.1-60.9)
Max. Load
 33.3 °C33.2 °C32.2 °C 
 33.9 °C33.3 °C32.3 °C 
 33.5 °C33.9 °C32.1 °C 
Maximum: 33.9 °C
Average: 33.1 °C
31.7 °C32.8 °C32.6 °C
31.2 °C32.5 °C32.9 °C
31.5 °C32.2 °C33.3 °C
Maximum: 33.3 °C
Average: 32.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  29.4 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.


扬声器

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203938.62524.427.33120.432.64018.3305030.730.96325.530.18023.93010018.133.21252039.816025.251.420016.852.525014.4573151759.940011.863.250012.969.163014.671.580013.672.1100012.274.1125013.676.3160013.878.2200013.480.6250013.482.6315013.482.8400013.576.9500013.476.2630013.575.3800013.267.11000013.562.21250013.664.21600013.349.9SPL25.990N0.777.4median 13.5median 69.1Delta1.610.235.233.421.727.818.627.921.721.33230.825.727.927.424.424.336.816.345.218.951.717.547.212.35615.757.911.658.511.866.512.468.711.672.312.574.113.172.212.571.413.171.912.871.412.877.212.971.713.367.713.472.813.767.913.76814.46713.759.125.284.20.759.9median 13.1median 67.91.57.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseVivo X NoteXiaomi 12 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Vivo X Note audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi 12 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Average of class Smartphone
  (424 - 1953, n=272, last 2 years)
907 min ∼34% +6%
Vivo X Note
5000 mAh
852 min ∼32%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
5000 mAh
844 min ∼32% -1%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
5000 mAh
788 min ∼30% -8%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
4600 mAh
766 min ∼29% -10%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 103)
14h 12min

Pros

+ 非常明亮和准确的LTPO面板
+ 良好的摄像头设置
+ 优秀的指纹传感器

Cons

- 没有Wi-Fi 6E
- 不确定的更新供应

结论 - 强大的旗舰智能手机,几乎没有弱点

在审查中。Vivo X Note。测试设备由TradingShenzhen提供。
在审查中。Vivo X Note。测试设备由TradingShenzhen提供。

vivo X Note是一款强大的高端智能手机,除了大屏幕,它还有更多的优点。我们特别喜欢测试中的屏幕,因为它非常明亮,可以在1至120赫兹之间工作,具有极高的像素密度,并提供准确的色彩再现。

此外,vivo智能手机还提供了我们希望从这样一个旗舰级设备中获得的几乎所有其他东西。存储空间充足,支持目前所有的移动标准,无线充电,IP认证,以及一个多功能的摄像头都在其中。

vivo X Note是一款强大的高端智能手机,有很多优点

由于相机中的B级,最终阻止了一个非常好的评价。该设置在日光下非常强大,但在低光下相当平庸。此外,许多功能只能在全高清视频模式下使用。不确定的更新供应也是这个价格范围内应该考虑的一个因素。

在这个国家,替代品的价格通常更高,但 Galaxy S22 Ultra, Honor Magic4 Pro奥普Find X5 Pro在这一点上值得一提。在相似的价格范围内, 像素6 Pro可以是一个诱人的前景。

价格和可用性

vivo X Note在欧洲只能从中国直接进口,由我们的贷款人TradingShenzhen提供。,例如。

Vivo X Note - 07/13/2022 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
82%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 90%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
67 / 70 → 95%
Weight
88%
Battery
90%
Display
92%
Games Performance
69 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
94 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%
Audio
73 / 90 → 82%
Camera
74%
Average
83%
87%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > vivo X Note评论。巨大的智能手机,拥有所有的拉链和密封圈
Daniel Schmidt, 2022-07-19 (Update: 2022-07-19)