Notebookcheck

XMG Focus 15 (Clevo NP50HK)游戏笔记本回顾。RTX 3050 Ti的极限

高TGP,高噪音水平。 考虑到其GeForce RTX 3050 Ti,申克科技的XMG Focus 15旨在吸引有价格意识的游戏玩家。我们对这款15英寸的笔记本电脑进行了广泛的测试。
Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Tiger Lake

XMG Focus 15可以在制造商的bestware.com上进行单独配置。主页上。然而,与Schenker Technologies公司的许多其他笔记本电脑相比,配置选项变得相当少。目前只有显示器(144赫兹的全高清IPS)、显卡(GeForce RTX 3050 Ti),以及处理器(酷睿i7-11800H).你会发现工作内存有更多选择,从8GB到最大64GB不等,存储方面则使用M.2 SSD和/或2.5英寸硬盘。主要是由于2.5英寸的插槽,电池容量只有49Wh。为了使电池寿命更长,我们希望看到这里有两个M.2插槽。客户还可以选择通信模块、键盘语言和操作系统。

XMG Focus 15的价格从1199欧元(约1401美元)起。我们测试的配置有32GB的双通道内存和1TB的固态硬盘,最终价格超过1500欧元(约1753美元),这对RTX 3050 Ti设备来说是相当大的。

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Processor
Intel Core i7-11800H 8 x 2.3 - 4.6 GHz, 95 W PL2 / Short Burst, 55 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake H45
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU - 4096 MB, Core: 1485 MHz, Memory: 1500 MHz, 75 W TDP, GDDR6, ForceWare 471.68, Optimus
Memory
32768 MB 
, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-3200, dual channel, two slots (both in use)
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB5, IPS, Full-HD, glossy: no, 144 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM570
Storage
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB, 1024 GB 
, NVMe, one M.2 slot (in use), one 2.5-inch-slot (empty)
Soundcard
Realtek ALC256 @ Intel Tiger Point-LP PCH - cAVS
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 1 headset, 1 microphone, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC
Networking
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 22 x 360 x 238
Battery
49 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Additional features
Speakers: 2.0, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 150 W power supply, Control Center, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.94 kg, Power Supply: 438 g
Price
1512 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

竞争对手包括其他15英寸笔记本电脑,其显卡为中高档或低档,如 戴尔XPS 15 9510,以及华硕TUF F15 FX506HM,以及联想Legion 5 15ACH,以及Ryzen版的睿频版的Alienware m15 R5.所有这些笔记本电脑都列在我们的比较图表中。

Possible Competitors for Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
83.2 %
10/2021
Schenker XMG Focus 15
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
1.9 kg22 mm15.60"1920x1080
88.4 %
09/2021
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
1.9 kg18 mm15.60"3456x2160
85.9 %
10/2021
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg24.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
83.4 %
09/2021
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg26 mm15.60"1920x1080
84.7 %
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg22.85 mm15.60"1920x1080

案例

这款机箱基于Clevo的裸机(NP50HK机箱),几乎在所有方面都显得不显眼。除了设计相当简单外,其余方面也不引人注目。这台15英寸的笔记本电脑大多显示出干净的做工和良好的稳定性,尽管在某些地方,塑料表面可以用一些力量压住。然而,这在实际操作中从未成为一种烦恼。铰链也很牢固。虽然在打开盖子时,底座也会略微抬起,但仍然可以用一只手打开显示屏。

XMG Focus 15
XMG Focus 15
XMG Focus 15
XMG Focus 15
XMG Focus 15
XMG Focus 15

这款机箱的亮点是其低重量。 1.9公斤(约4.2磅)是测试领域的最低值,戴尔XPS 15也是如此。RTX 3060笔记本电脑带来了2.3至2.5公斤(约5-5.5磅)的重量。Focus 15也因其纤细的结构而得分。只有2.2厘米(约0.9英寸)的高度确保了纤细的外观,加上适度的重量,确保了良好的移动性。

Size Comparison

363 mm 261 mm 26 mm 2.5 kg359 mm 256 mm 24.9 mm 2.3 kg360 mm 238 mm 22 mm 1.9 kg356.2 mm 272.5 mm 22.85 mm 2.5 kg345 mm 230 mm 18 mm 1.9 kg

装备

连接

那些可以不用Thunderbolt的人应该对Focus 15的连接设备感到满意。左侧提供了一个Kensington锁的开口,两个USB-A端口(1个2.0,1个3.0),以及两个用于麦克风和耳机的音频输出,右侧提供了一个全尺寸读卡器,一个USB-C端口(3.2 Gen2),一个额外的USB-A端口(3.0),以及一个带有折叠装置的RJ45端口。最后,电源和显示输出(HDMI 2.0,Mini-DisplayPort 1.4)的连接位于背面。

由于一些连接被放置在后面,而且USB端口分布良好,所以应该有足够的空间来使用外部鼠标。

左侧。Kensington锁,USB-A 3.0,USB-A 2.0,麦克风,耳机
左侧。Kensington锁,USB-A 3.0,USB-A 2.0,麦克风,耳机
右侧:读卡器、USB-C 3.2 Gen2、USB-A 3.0、RJ45 LAN
右侧:读卡器、USB-C 3.2 Gen2、USB-A 3.0、RJ45 LAN
背面。Mini-DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.0, 电源连接
背面。Mini-DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.0, 电源连接

SD卡阅读器

内置读卡器支持SD、SDHC和SDXC卡格式,并提供了一个平庸的性能。在连续读取和传输照片时,你可以期待大约80至90 MB/s。作为比较,戴尔XPS 15使用我们的AV Pro 128 GB V60参考卡突破了200MB大关。所有其他竞争对手都不提供读卡器。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
  (AV Pro V60)
224 MB/s ∼100% +177%
Average of class Gaming
  (18 - 222, n=92, last 2 years)
118 MB/s ∼53% +46%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
81 MB/s ∼36%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
  (AV Pro V60)
202.8 MB/s ∼100% +123%
Average of class Gaming
  (20.5 - 257, n=92, last 2 years)
132 MB/s ∼65% +45%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
91 MB/s ∼45%

沟通

我们的测试装置使用英特尔Wi-Fi 6 AX201作为通信模块。除了WLAN 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax之外,它还支持蓝牙5.1。在我们的范围测试中(与Netgear Nighthawk AX12参考路由器的距离为1米),Focus 15取得了非常好的成绩,发送数据时为1500 Mbit/s,接收数据时为1300 Mbit/s以上。凭借这些数值,它在我们的测试领域分别取得了第一名和第三名的成绩。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1482 (759min - 1594max) MBit/s ∼100%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1371 (925min - 1499max) MBit/s ∼93% -7%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1368 (669min - 1440max) MBit/s ∼92% -8%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=269)
1156 MBit/s ∼78% -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (496 - 1645, n=159, last 2 years)
1152 MBit/s ∼78% -22%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
MediaTek MT7921
787 (675min - 851max) MBit/s ∼53% -47%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
561 (310min - 825max) MBit/s ∼38% -62%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1330 (711min - 1563max) MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1319 (1015min - 1489max) MBit/s ∼99% 0%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1318 (667min - 1344max) MBit/s ∼99%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (136 - 1743, n=269)
1247 MBit/s ∼94% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (90 - 1743, n=159, last 2 years)
1217 MBit/s ∼92% -8%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
MediaTek MT7921
878 (827min - 896max) MBit/s ∼66% -33%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
828 (634min - 900max) MBit/s ∼62% -37%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550667132013211318133013141327131813381343129813051301131413371323129613441332133713141324129513081311131013041305130713016671320132113181330131413271318133813431298130513011314133713231296134413321337131413241295130813111310130413051307130175915031334124015881523148614831551153814721443159415161471154615311479149015331522116613711512156515181417152115161520Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1295 (667-1344)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1457 (759-1594)

网络摄像头

像往常一样,你不应该对网络摄像头有太多的期望。图像的清晰度和色彩还原度相当有限。

ColorChecker
24.3 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
25.9 ∆E
24.8 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
18 ∆E
25.7 ∆E
33.6 ∆E
22.9 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
25.3 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
23 ∆E
25.9 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
22.5 ∆E
22.9 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Schenker XMG Focus 15: 21.09 ∆E min: 1.76 - max: 33.64 ∆E

辅料

盒子里有一本快速入门手册,一张驱动DVD,一个装有软件的U盘,以及2.5英寸插槽的螺丝。Focus 15的电源是一个令人愉快的轻巧的150瓦模型。

维护

为了进入内部,你必须首先从机箱底部卸下总共15颗飞利浦螺钉。然后,你只需用很小的力气就可以掀开底盖。作为Clevo机箱的典型代表,维护选项非常好。除了电池、WLAN模块和工作内存外,你还可以接触到M.2和2.5英寸的插槽。冷却系统由两个风扇组成,每个风扇都有几根热管通向CPU和GPU(焊接在一起,所以不能更换)。

XMG Focus 15
XMG Focus 15
XMG Focus 15
XMG Focus 15
XMG Focus 15

担保

基本保修期为2年(6个月快速维修)。在额外的费用下,整个保修期内还可以提供长达3年的快速维修。

输入设备

键盘

我们已经知道其他Clevo Barebones的键盘。这款可以用多种颜色和级别照明的小鸡模型提供了一个专门的数字块和相当好的打字体验。买家也应该对舒适的按键尺寸感到满意。除了WASD键之外,方向键也有一个合适的尺寸。打字的噪音既不是很安静,也不是特别大,安在中间的位置。一个积极的观点是,由于键盘的位置较高,掌托的尺寸很充足。

触摸板

触摸板也令人印象深刻。大约12×7.3厘米(约4.7×2.9英寸),对于一个15英寸的笔记本电脑来说是相当多的。遵循目前的趋势,这是一个没有专用按键的ClickPad。凭借光滑的表面和良好的精确度,鼠标移动非常顺利地成功。 然而,制造商应该改进稳定性。特别是垫子的左右边缘可以比平时压得更紧。同样的问题也出现在17英寸的机型上,该机型将很快得到审查评估。

显示

该显示屏由经典的IPS面板组成,分辨率为1920x1080像素,刷新率为144赫兹。

361
cd/m²
380
cd/m²
381
cd/m²
359
cd/m²
418
cd/m²
383
cd/m²
347
cd/m²
378
cd/m²
378
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB5
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 418 cd/m² Average: 376.1 cd/m² Minimum: 24 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 418 cd/m²
Contrast: 1020:1 (Black: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.67 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5, calibrated: 0.98
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
66.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.26
Schenker XMG Focus 15
LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB5, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
SDC414D, OLED, 3456x2160, 15.60
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
B156HAN12.H, , 1920x1080, 15.60
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
B156HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display
36%
-35%
1%
Display P3 Coverage
64.6
99.9
55%
41.9
-35%
65.4
1%
sRGB Coverage
95.3
100
5%
62.9
-34%
96.3
1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
66.5
98.1
48%
43.3
-35%
67.5
2%
Response Times
74%
-102%
10%
42%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
18 ?(9.2, 8.8)
3.6 ?(2, 1.6)
80%
28.4 ?(15.6, 12.8)
-58%
13.6 ?(6.8, 6.8)
24%
4 ?(1.2, 2.8)
78%
Response Time Black / White *
8.8 ?(3.6, 5.2)
2.8 ?(1.2, 1.6)
68%
21.6 ?(11.6, 10)
-145%
9.2 ?(4.4, 4.8)
-5%
8.4 ?(4.4, 4)
5%
PWM Frequency
59.52 ?(99)
Screen
49%
-99%
-40%
-13%
Brightness middle
418
362
-13%
268.3
-36%
350
-16%
329
-21%
Brightness
376
367
-2%
257
-32%
350
-7%
321
-15%
Brightness Distribution
83
97
17%
84
1%
96
16%
92
11%
Black Level *
0.41
0.06
85%
0.34
17%
0.3
27%
0.27
34%
Contrast
1020
6033
491%
789
-23%
1167
14%
1219
20%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.67
2.1
-26%
5.05
-202%
3.9
-134%
2.78
-66%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.88
4.1
-6%
15.43
-298%
8.2
-111%
4.88
-26%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
0.98
2.5
-155%
3.21
-228%
1.6
-63%
1.63
-66%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.9
1.4
52%
5.5
-90%
5.5
-90%
2.5
14%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.18 101%
2.35 94%
2.15 102%
2.106 104%
CCT
6209 105%
6608 98%
7392 88%
7414 88%
6201 105%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
76
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99
Total Average (Program / Settings)
53% / 50%
-79% / -86%
-10% / -24%
15% / -3%

* ... smaller is better

在积极的一面,我们有特别好的亮度。在最大亮度下近376cd/m²的亮度代表了我们测试领域的最佳价值,紧随其后的是戴尔XPS 15的OLED面板,为367cd/m²。这意味着你也可以在户外轻松使用这台15英寸的笔记本电脑。

卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:饱和度
卡尔曼:饱和度
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN:灰度(校准的)。
CalMAN:灰度(校准的)。
CalMAN: 饱和度(已校准)
CalMAN: 饱和度(已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)

由于黑值低于最佳值(0.41cd/m²),对比度值只放在领域的中间。但对于大多数买家来说,大约1000:1应该是足够的。另一方面,良好的色彩再现值得一些正面评价。15英寸的屏幕在交付状态下已经提供了一个平衡的图像。

XMG Focus 15 vs sRGB
XMG Focus 15 vs sRGB
子像素网格
子像素网格
XMG Focus 15 VS AdobeRGB
XMG Focus 15 VS AdobeRGB

对于色彩空间覆盖率,我们测量了95%的sRGB和66%的AdobeRGB。对于一台游戏笔记本来说,这些都是相对较好的数值。测得的8.8毫秒黑色到白色和18毫秒灰色到灰色的响应时间与其他144赫兹的IPS面板相似。

背光
背光
视角
视角

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.6 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.2 ms rise
↘ 8.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17025 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

测试条件

预装的控制中心允许调整各种系统设置。我们的测试是在性能模式下使用自动风扇控制进行的。

控制中心
控制中心
控制中心
控制中心
控制中心

业绩

尽管我们的测试装置带来了八核CPU、32GB内存和1TB固态硬盘,但XMG Focus 15 "只 "定位于中端。GeForce RTX 3050 Ti更多的是为了那些不需要以最大细节玩每一个新游戏,并且对获得一个面向未来的设备不提出特别高要求的偶尔玩家。

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
 

处理器

在移动游戏领域,英特尔的 酷睿i7-11800H是目前最成功的处理器之一。这款10纳米的型号包含24MB L3缓存,并能够通过超线程在16个线程上同时运行。在负载下,时钟速度在2.3和最高4.6GHz之间。

在我们的Cinebench循环中,Focus 15的结果只是一般。即使CPU性能在较长的时间内保持相当稳定,并且范围高于戴尔XPS 15,但Core i7-11800H在其他笔记本电脑中仍然取得了更好的基准测试结果(例如,见华硕TUF F15)。Focus 15在与基于Ryzen 7 5800H的笔记本电脑的比较中也有困难。 Ryzen 7 5800H.然而,由于大多数3D应用都受到GPU的限制,游戏玩家在玩游戏时不必担心任何限制。

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

011022033044055066077088099011001210132014301540165017601870198020901770.151761.571724.811742.391736.491719.031737.621717.841735.281721.241700.751729.431706.341721.321727.041730.551708.671718.951704.091713.211727.121725.921701.841688.331715.492024.191795.411719.621716.151694.561589.381592.361604.241764.291641.031604.31636.061638.141622.591637.131644.471621.531629.861618.521618.841620.481643.391641.291614.41639.212009.951786.831594.261566.051577.781576.61568.631574.681576.61580.531586.421599.31587.361601.351646.631593.311589.381604.111648.741647.651598.341636.061647.651607.331613.422095.122011.162009.651997.12025.521980.11977.072020.711989.361994.221987.782022.352011.261993.922003.411990.842000.31987.782004.912004.911997.11978.531997.11978.531986.291980.11963.381993.921997.12000.31998.71983.141998.72008.032015.931978.921987.782017.551964.931964.932001.72019.182004.911974.041998.71980.22012.781995.512000.31981.672119.212127.772130.272107.592124.382114.052118.422128.112107.72124.952121.232122.352114.952128.112121.232127.092124.612133.92117.5221212126.532141.442132.882124.162121.342004.511985.011987.281974.921976.971980.591991.541952.171981.571984.321959.251954.561967.921976.481981.871983.341984.131985.511971.321921.881983.341989.461978.531987.381978.24Tooltip
Schenker XMG Focus 15 Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1723 (1688.33-1770.15)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Core i7-11800H; Ultra Performance: Ø1663 (1589.38-2024.19)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1625 (1566.05-2009.95)
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1997 (1963.38-2095.12)
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2123 (2107.59-2141.44)
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø1977 (1921.88-2004.51)
Cinebench R23
CPU (Multi Core)
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
13445 (12565.7min - 13444.6max) Points ∼100% +24%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
13028 Points ∼97% +20%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
12195 Points ∼91% +13%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (8447 - 14088, n=26)
11885 Points ∼88% +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (4621 - 14363, n=87, last 2 years)
10876 Points ∼81% +1%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
10816 Points ∼80%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
10531 Points ∼78% -3%
CPU (Single Core)
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
1509 Points ∼100% +9%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
1498 Points ∼99% +8%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1386 - 1520, n=24)
1490 Points ∼99% +7%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1430 Points ∼95% +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1410 Points ∼93% +1%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
1390 Points ∼92%
Average of class Gaming
  (1095 - 1619, n=86, last 2 years)
1367 Points ∼91% -2%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
5182 Points ∼100% +20%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5020 Points ∼97% +17%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4711 Points ∼91% +9%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (3306 - 5408, n=28)
4597 Points ∼89% +7%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
4307 Points ∼83%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
3848 Points ∼74% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (1397 - 6321, n=190, last 2 years)
3756 Points ∼72% -13%
CPU (Single Core)
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
582 Points ∼100% +9%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
581 Points ∼100% +8%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (520 - 586, n=25)
573 Points ∼98% +7%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
559 Points ∼96% +4%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
550 Points ∼95% +3%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
536 Points ∼92%
Average of class Gaming
  (312 - 634, n=189, last 2 years)
499 Points ∼86% -7%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2119 Points ∼100% +20%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
2095 (1963.38min - 2095.12max) Points ∼99% +18%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
2024.19 Points ∼96% +14%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
2009.95 Points ∼95% +14%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2005 (1921.88min - 2004.51max) Points ∼95% +13%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1342 - 2173, n=27)
1934 Points ∼91% +9%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
1770 (1688.33min - 1770.15max) Points ∼84%
Average of class Gaming
  (536 - 2804, n=207, last 2 years)
1599 Points ∼75% -10%
CPU Single 64Bit
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
232 Points ∼100% +10%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
229 Points ∼99% +9%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
228 Points ∼98% +9%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
225 Points ∼97% +7%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (204 - 231, n=24)
225 Points ∼97% +7%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
210 Points ∼91%
Average of class Gaming
  (108 - 254, n=196, last 2 years)
203 Points ∼88% -3%
Blender 2.79 - BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (179 - 555, n=172, last 2 years)
314 Seconds * ∼100% -13%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
298 Seconds * ∼95% -7%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
278 Seconds * ∼89%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (217 - 342, n=24)
267 Seconds * ∼85% +4%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
253 Seconds * ∼81% +9%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
239 Seconds * ∼76% +14%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
235 Seconds * ∼75% +15%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
53902 MIPS ∼100% +13%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
53239 MIPS ∼99% +12%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
51046 MIPS ∼95% +7%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (37641 - 56758, n=24)
49205 MIPS ∼91% +3%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
47642 MIPS ∼88%
Average of class Gaming
  (15146 - 75612, n=173, last 2 years)
44903 MIPS ∼83% -6%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
42570 MIPS ∼79% -11%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
5659 MIPS ∼100% +10%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5591 MIPS ∼99% +8%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (5138 - 5716, n=24)
5479 MIPS ∼97% +6%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5448 MIPS ∼96% +5%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
5427 MIPS ∼96% +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (2945 - 6174, n=173, last 2 years)
5242 MIPS ∼93% +2%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
5164 MIPS ∼91%
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
9073 Points ∼100%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
8164 Points ∼90% -10%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7522 Points ∼83% -17%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7508 Points ∼83% -17%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (3323 - 9851, n=20)
7360 Points ∼81% -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (2783 - 11393, n=171, last 2 years)
7176 Points ∼79% -21%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
1540 Points ∼100% +4%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1481 Points ∼96% 0%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
1480 Points ∼96%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1462 Points ∼95% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (882 - 1625, n=20)
1390 Points ∼90% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (703 - 1777, n=171, last 2 years)
1308 Points ∼85% -12%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
15.6 fps ∼100% +14%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
15 fps ∼96% +9%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
14.7 fps ∼94% +7%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (10.5 - 17.4, n=24)
14.2 fps ∼91% +4%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
13.7 fps ∼88%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
12.4 fps ∼79% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.13 - 19.8, n=172, last 2 years)
12.4 fps ∼79% -9%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
113 s * ∼100% -139%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
57.4 s * ∼51% -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (23.9 - 113, n=165, last 2 years)
54.6 s * ∼48% -15%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
47.5 s * ∼42% -0%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
47.3 s * ∼42%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (38.6 - 50.7, n=24)
46 s * ∼41% +3%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
44.5 s * ∼39% +6%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Schenker XMG Focus 15
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.601 sec * ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.4907 - 1.088, n=167, last 2 years)
0.581 sec * ∼97% +3%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.567 sec * ∼94% +6%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (0.548 - 0.605, n=24)
0.567 sec * ∼94% +6%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.556 sec * ∼93% +7%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.539 sec * ∼90% +10%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.524 sec * ∼87% +13%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1770 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
221 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
210 Points
Help

系统性能

不仅仅是由于快速的固态硬盘,这台15英寸的笔记本电脑最终在系统测试中排名第一。在PCMark 10中获得6478分,排名第三,Schenker笔记本电脑的表现与Alienware m15 R5的测试配置持平。

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6865 Points ∼100% +6%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
6648 Points ∼97% +3%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
6478 Points ∼94%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
6465 Points ∼94% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (6019 - 6556, n=3)
6351 Points ∼93% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (3952 - 7884, n=175, last 2 years)
6131 Points ∼89% -5%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
6019 Points ∼88% -7%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
10522 Points ∼100% +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
10396 Points ∼99% +2%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
10171 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (9490 - 10221, n=3)
9961 Points ∼95% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (7148 - 11266, n=174, last 2 years)
9656 Points ∼92% -5%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
9589 Points ∼91% -6%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
9490 Points ∼90% -7%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
9728 Points ∼100% +13%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
8913 Points ∼92% +3%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
8859 Points ∼91% +3%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
8639 Points ∼89%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (8344 - 8723, n=3)
8569 Points ∼88% -1%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
8344 Points ∼86% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (5813 - 10066, n=174, last 2 years)
8286 Points ∼85% -4%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9423 Points ∼100% +12%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
8582 Points ∼91% +2%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
8399 Points ∼89%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7475 - 8577, n=3)
8150 Points ∼86% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (3670 - 12250, n=174, last 2 years)
7939 Points ∼84% -5%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
7884 Points ∼84% -6%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
7475 Points ∼79% -11%
PCMark 10 Score
6478 points
Help

DPC延迟

即使XMG Focus 15与竞争对手相比显示出相对较低的延迟,但根据LatencyMon工具,它只在有限的程度上适用于实时音频和视频处理。至少,在没有任何手动调整的交付状态下是这样的。

延迟监测
延迟监测
延迟监测
延迟监测
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1913.9 μs * ∼100% -239%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1431.2 μs * ∼75% -154%
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
703 μs * ∼37% -25%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
563.9 μs * ∼29%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
428.6 μs * ∼22% +24%

* ... smaller is better

存储解决方案

我们的测试设备配备了一个强大的三星固态硬盘。970 Evo Plus的1TB版本超过了所有竞争设备中的固态驱动器,无论是美光、SK海力士还是东芝。该M.2驱动器在读取和写入数据时提供了一流的性能。

Schenker XMG Focus 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-26%
-17%
-16%
-38%
Write 4K
238.3
109.35
-54%
168.1
-29%
124.59
-48%
116.95
-51%
Read 4K
55.6
53.91
-3%
65.09
17%
54.18
-3%
44.56
-20%
Write Seq
3013
1990.54
-34%
2124
-30%
2705.77
-10%
1551.63
-49%
Read Seq
2879
1759.22
-39%
2204
-23%
2297.9
-20%
1682.12
-42%
Write 4K Q32T1
568.5
499.78
-12%
455.3
-20%
499.66
-12%
497.75
-12%
Read 4K Q32T1
714.8
438.81
-39%
465.6
-35%
570.23
-20%
436.8
-39%
Write Seq Q32T1
3287
2834.8
-14%
2911
-11%
2998.9
-9%
1461.4
-56%
Read Seq Q32T1
3561
3234.8
-9%
3519
-1%
3460.5
-3%
2363.9
-34%
AS SSD
-53%
-9%
-23%
-64%
Seq Read
2988.43
1362
-54%
2872.59
-4%
2960
-1%
2082
-30%
Seq Write
2541.48
1440
-43%
1619.38
-36%
2586
2%
825
-68%
4K Read
42.82
38.43
-10%
57.51
34%
46.84
9%
42.41
-1%
4K Write
87.02
121.41
40%
149.57
72%
96.08
10%
98.28
13%
4K-64 Read
2095.65
370.5
-82%
1251.93
-40%
854.08
-59%
1255.39
-40%
4K-64 Write
2455.47
1053.65
-57%
2196.29
-11%
2015.02
-18%
737.69
-70%
Access Time Read *
0.068
0.042
38%
0.04
41%
0.048
29%
0.109
-60%
Access Time Write *
0.043
0.135
-214%
0.082
-91%
0.094
-119%
0.17
-295%
Score Read
2437
545
-78%
1597
-34%
1197
-51%
1506
-38%
Score Write
2797
1319
-53%
2508
-10%
2370
-15%
918
-67%
Score Total
6452
2160
-67%
4869
-25%
4170
-35%
3136
-51%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-40% / -41%
-13% / -12%
-20% / -20%
-51% / -53%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3561 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3287 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 714.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 568.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2879 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 3013 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 55.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 238.3 MB/s

Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

0180360540720900108012601440162018001980216023402520270028803060324034202882.543099.593111.543131.683303.853551.953551.953551.953552.373552.583552.993553.413553.413553.833554.043554.673554.883554.883554.883554.883555.093555.093555.33555.513555.723555.723555.723555.933555.933555.933555.933556.143556.143556.353556.353556.563556.563556.773556.773556.983557.193557.193557.193557.193557.193557.43557.613557.823558.033558.45Tooltip
: Ø3511 (2882.54-3558.45)

图形卡

为了获得最大的图形性能,从GeForce RTX 3050 Ti制造商为Focus 15配置了75瓦的TGP(包括动态提升)。有了它,这台15英寸的笔记本电脑明显领先于戴尔XPS 15,后者的RTX 3050 Ti只得到45瓦,只比一半多一点。这种情况也反映在基准运行中,尽管Focus 15并没有提供两倍的性能。

RTX 3050 Ti的最大问题是视频存储量太少。对于一个中端GPU来说,4GB已经不是最新的了。在2012年至少应该是6GB的VRAM。目前的游戏,如"死神》(Deathloop"已经要求在全高清分辨率下超过4GB,即使是在最低设置下。这意味着,Nvidia在这里过于节俭,不必要地限制了未来的实用性。你也不应该期望RTX 3050 Ti有很高的光线追踪性能。例如,在3DMark基准测试的Port Royal测试中,其结果是悲惨的,与RTX 3060,它经常在类似价格的笔记本电脑中运行。

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
29164 Points ∼100% +48%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
27898 Points ∼96% +41%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
26881 Points ∼92% +36%
Average of class Gaming
  (1925 - 43077, n=186, last 2 years)
26874 Points ∼92% +36%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
19746 Points ∼68%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (15387 - 20905, n=7)
19284 Points ∼66% -2%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
15387 Points ∼53% -22%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
21806 Points ∼100% +48%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
21111 Points ∼97% +44%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
20312 Points ∼93% +38%
Average of class Gaming
  (1360 - 34993, n=194, last 2 years)
20253 Points ∼93% +38%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
14696 Points ∼67%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (12119 - 14815, n=7)
14241 Points ∼65% -3%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
12119 Points ∼56% -18%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
8844 Points ∼100% +58%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
8295 Points ∼94% +48%
Average of class Gaming
  (429 - 13210, n=198, last 2 years)
7732 Points ∼87% +38%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
7677 Points ∼87% +37%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
5594 Points ∼63%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (4591 - 6122, n=8)
5565 Points ∼63% -1%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
4591 Points ∼52% -18%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (425 - 8032, n=116, last 2 years)
4866 Points ∼100% +748%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
4852 Points ∼100% +745%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
4795 Points ∼99% +735%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (569 - 588, n=5)
578 Points ∼12% +1%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
574 Points ∼12%
3DMark 11 Performance
19072 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
42503 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
13179 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
5963 points
Help

游戏性能

尽管RTX 3050 Ti的存储量很小,但它的速度足以在高至最大细节设置的原生全高清分辨率下流畅地运行大多数游戏。只有在糟糕的编程和/或要求极高的游戏中,如"孤岛危机重制版"时,DirectX-12芯片才开始出现问题。虽然Focus 15在这里仍然领先于戴尔XPS 15,但它明显落后于使用RTX 3060的笔记本电脑,后者运行速度约为40%。

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
146 fps ∼100% +43%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
143.9 (136min - 155max) fps ∼99% +41%
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
142 fps ∼97% +39%
Average of class Gaming
  (42.1 - 242, n=153, last 2 years)
139 fps ∼95% +36%
Schenker XMG Focus 15
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
102 (87min) fps ∼70%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (91 - 104, n=7)
100 fps ∼68% -2%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
91 fps ∼62% -11%

我们通过运行角色扮演""来评估显卡在更长的3D负载下的表现。角色扮演Witcher 3"大约60分钟(FHD/Ultra)。结果是,就像CPU的性能一样,GPU的性能也保持相当稳定。

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

051015202530354045505560657075565656555656555656555656565556555655565556555655565556555556555655555655565556555656555555555655555655555556555555565555555655555555555655555555555556555555565555555556555556555555565555555555555555555556555555555555555655555556555555555555555655545555555654555555555555555555555554555555555555555554555555555554555555555555545555555555555555555554555555555555555555555455555455555555555555555554555655555455555555555655555555555555565555555555555555555555565555555556555555555655555556555655555556555555555556555555555555555555565555555655555655555555555655565555565555565556555556555556555655555655565555565555565555565556555556555655565555565556555556555555565555565556555655565556555655555655565555565655555656555655565555565556565556565555555556555655555655555554555554565455555655555456545655555655565555555655565555565556555656555556555555565556565556555656555655565655565655565556565655565655565655565656555556555556555656555656555656555556555556555655565656555656555656555655565656555656555656555656555656565656555656565656555656565656565556565656565655565656565656565656565655565655575655565656565556565657565756575657565657565657565756565756565656575656565656575656565756565757565756565756565756575656575656565657575657565657575657565657575756575756575656575657565757565757575657575656575657565756575657575756565756575657575756575757565757565757565756575756575757575657575757565657575657575656565756575657575657575657565756575656565655565656565656565656565756565656565657565656565657565756565756565656565556555756565656565756565756565756565656575656565656565756565656565657565656565656565655575656565656565656555656565656565656575556565657565656565655565657565656565756555656565656565656575656565657565657565657565657565756565656575656565657565757565756575756565757565756575657565756575656575657565756575756565657565756575756575657565657565657565657565756575657565756565756575656565756565756565756575656575656575656575656565756565756565756565656575657565656555657565656565657565657565656565657565656565657565656555656565756565656565656565556565656565656565656565656555656565656565656565656565655545655565555565556555655565556555656555655565555565555565556555655565655565555565556555556565556555656555656555655565556555556555655555655555655555556555555555555555555565555555555565556555655565556555655565655555655555556555556545555555555555555555555555555555555555556555655555555555555555655555555555556555555565556565556565556565556555656565656565656565556565656565655565655565556565656555656555656565656555656565656555656555656555656565655565656565655565556565556555556555655565654565556545556555556555556555556555656565656555755565656565756565656565656555555545554555455545455545554555454545455545554555454555455545455535454545554555455545555545554555455545554555454545554545554545554555454555454545554545554555454555554545554555455545555545455545554555555555455555554555554555554555554555555565555555655565556555555555555565556555556555556555555555655555555565555565555565556555556555655565655555656555655565556565556555656555656565556565655565556555655565655555655555556555655565556565556555656555656555655565555565655565556555656555656555656555656555656555656555656555656555555565656555656565655565656555656565655565656565656565655565656565556565656565656565656575656565657565656565656565756565656575656565656565656565656565656565656565655565656565656565655565655565656565656565656565656565556565656555656565556565656565655565656565656565556565655565656565655555656565656565656565656565556565556565556565655565556565556555655565655565556565555565655555555565556555655565556565556555655565556555655555655555655555556555555555556555556555554565555555555555555555556555555545554555455545555545554555455545554555455545556545554555555555555555555555554555555555555555554555555555455545556555555555556555555555555555555565555555556555555555655555555565555555555555555555556555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555554555555555455555555555555555554555554555554555555545454555554555555545555545555545554555455545555545554545554555454545454545554545454555454545455545454555454545455545454545454535454545454545454555354545454545454545454555354545454545454545454545454545453555354545454545454545454545354555454545354545454545454545453545454545354545454535454545454535354545453545454545454545354545454545454535454545454545454545354545554545454545455545454545454545454545454545554545454545455545454545455545454545554545454545454545454545454545454555454545454545454545454545454535554535454545454545354545453545454545454555454545454545454545554545454545454545454545454545454545454545454555454545454545455545454545454545454555454545454545554545454555454545455545455545454555455545554545554545554555554545554555455545454555455545455545554555455545454555455555455545555545555555554555554555555555455555555555455555555555455555555555555555554565455555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555554555554555554555554555455555455545555545455555455545555545555545554555454555455555455555553555455555455545555555554555554555555555455555454555555555455555455555554555554555554555554555554555454555554555554555455555455555454545554555554545454555455545454545454545554545554555454545455545555545554545554555455555454555455555455545554555555545454555454555554545554555554545555545554555454545554555455545554555455545554555555545555545554555554545554545454545555545555545555545555555555545555555555565555555555555555555555545555555555555655555555555455565455555655555555565556565556555656555555565556555655565656565556565656555656555656565656555656565655555656555655565556565556555655565556565556555655565556555655565556555655565556555656555655565556565556555655565556565556555655565556555655565556555655565556565556555655555556555555565555555556555555555555555654555554555555555555555555545554555455555554555555545554545554555455545554555454555454545455545555545555555455555554555554535354535353535453535353535353535353535353535353525253535253535253525353535253525352535253525353525352535353525353525352535152515152515152515251515152515152515151515251515152515251515251515251525251525251525251525252515252525252515252525251525352525253525252525253515252525352525252535252525252515352525252525352525252525253