Notebookcheck

酷比魔方 Thinker Laptop (Core m3-7Y30, 8 GB, 256 GB) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Florian Schaar (translated by Kangfei Zheng), 07/28/2017
Chinese Tech Kaby Lake Notebook Touchscreen Ultrabook Windows

经济版Surface 笔记本电脑。 来自远东的笔记本电脑已经越来越好,至少在他们的外观和特色方面是。其中一个中国高端机代表是酷比魔方Thinker,它配有优雅的铝合金外壳和Surface一样的屏幕。但是,性能能否和店面里的介绍一样?

Cube Thinker m3
Processor
Graphics adapter
Memory
8192 MB 
Display
13.5 inch 3:2, 3000x2000 pixel 267 PPI, 5 指触控, native pen support, Panasonic MEI96A2, IPS, glossy: yes
Mainboard
Intel Kaby Lake-Y Premium PCH
Storage
,  GB 
, 256 GB SATA 固态硬盘 (不知名品牌), 210 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 耳机, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 14 x 313 x 237
Battery
50 Wh Lithium-Polymer, SR Real battery, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 10 h
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 2.0 MP
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 双通道, Keyboard: 巧克力键盘, Keyboard Light: no, power supply, European adapter, fanless
Weight
1.671 kg, Power Supply: 218 g
Price
525 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple MacBook 12 2017
Broadcom 802.11ac
660 MBit/s ∼100% +119%
Microsoft Surface Laptop
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
534 MBit/s ∼81% +77%
Cube Thinker m3
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
302 MBit/s ∼46%
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
208 MBit/s ∼32% -31%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple MacBook 12 2017
Broadcom 802.11ac
689 MBit/s ∼100% +104%
Microsoft Surface Laptop
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
556 MBit/s ∼81% +65%
Cube Thinker m3
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
337 MBit/s ∼49%
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
142 MBit/s ∼21% -58%
526
cd/m²
490
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
465
cd/m²
448
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
442
cd/m²
441
cd/m²
426
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 526 cd/m² Average: 461.2 cd/m² Minimum: 18 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 81 %
Center on Battery: 448 cd/m²
Contrast: 1723:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.3 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 2.53 | - Ø
70% sRGB (Argyll) 44% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.46
Cube Thinker m3
Panasonic MEI96A2, , 3000x2000, 13.5
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
3000x2000, 13.5
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
AU Optronics AUO106D B125HANO1.0, , 1920x1080, 12.5
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
AUO B133HAN02.7, , 1920x1080, 13.3
Response Times
20%
54%
31%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
65 (31, 34)
48.4 (19.6, 28.8)
26%
28 (9, 19)
57%
29 (15, 14)
55%
Response Time Black / White *
38 (21, 17)
32.8 (7.6, 25.2)
14%
19 (5, 14)
50%
22 (5, 17)
42%
PWM Frequency
200 (75)
192 (30)
-4%
Screen
17%
-24%
-33%
Brightness
461
410
-11%
364
-21%
298
-35%
Brightness Distribution
81
93
15%
88
9%
90
11%
Black Level *
0.26
0.254
2%
0.32
-23%
0.21
19%
Contrast
1723
1696
-2%
1184
-31%
1438
-17%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.3
2.06
38%
4.78
-45%
6.33
-92%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.53
2.22
12%
4.27
-69%
8.13
-221%
Gamma
2.46 98%
2.13 113%
2.34 103%
2.52 95%
CCT
6563 99%
6520 100%
7376 88%
6811 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
44
64
45%
42
-5%
60
36%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
70
96
37%
65
-7%
93
33%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
19% / 18%
15% / -9%
-1% / -16%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
65 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 31 ms rise
↘ 34 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (43 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 200 Hz
75 cd/m² brightness

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 75 cd/m² and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

As the flickering occurs only on very low brightness settings, it should not be an issue in typical office settings. Nonetheless, use in low light conditions may be straining to the eyes.

In comparison: 58 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 5901 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
Intel Core i5-6300U
122 Points ∼100% +18%
Cube Thinker m3
Intel Core m3-7Y30
103 Points ∼84%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
Intel Core m3-6Y30
85 Points ∼70% -17%
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
Intel Core m3-6Y30
78 Points ∼64% -24%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
Intel Core i5-6300U
305 Points ∼100% +35%
Cube Thinker m3
Intel Core m3-7Y30
226 Points ∼74%
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
Intel Core m3-6Y30
209 Points ∼69% -8%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
Intel Core m3-6Y30
208 Points ∼68% -8%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
3699 Points ∼100% +1%
Cube Thinker m3
HD Graphics 615, 7Y30
3656 Points ∼99%
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
Maxwell GPU (940M, GDDR5), 6300U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe
3644 Points ∼99% 0%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128
3496 Points ∼95% -4%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Cube Thinker m3
HD Graphics 615, 7Y30
2881 Points ∼100%
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
Maxwell GPU (940M, GDDR5), 6300U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe
2814 Points ∼98% -2%
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
2767 Points ∼96% -4%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128
2727 Points ∼95% -5%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Cube Thinker m3
HD Graphics 615, 7Y30
26021 Points ∼100%
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
21128 Points ∼81% -19%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128
19348 Points ∼74% -26%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128
1704 ms * ∼100% -21%
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
1623.7 ms * ∼95% -15%
Cube Thinker m3
HD Graphics 615, 7Y30
1414.1 ms * ∼83%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Cube Thinker m3
HD Graphics 615, 7Y30
174.42 Points ∼100%
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
143.85 Points ∼82% -18%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128
111.11 Points ∼64% -36%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
2881 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
3801 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
3656 points
Help
Cube Thinker m3
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
Lite-On CV1-8B128
AS SSD
86%
-44%
-5%
Access Time Write *
0.179
0.037
79%
0.183
-2%
0.073
59%
Access Time Read *
0.128
0.049
62%
0.166
-30%
0.109
15%
4K-64 Write
290.24
281.41
-3%
21.55
-93%
105.75
-64%
4K-64 Read
324.57
1409.22
334%
82.88
-74%
295.1
-9%
4K Write
55.01
84.96
54%
27.49
-50%
57.01
4%
4K Read
26.4
34.31
30%
15.9
-40%
28.29
7%
Seq Write
362.84
275.22
-24%
130.26
-64%
175.65
-52%
Seq Read
483.68
1223
153%
480.88
-1%
486.25
1%

* ... smaller is better

Sequential Read: 483.68 MB/s
Sequential Write: 362.84 MB/s
4K Read: 26.4 MB/s
4K Write: 55.01 MB/s
4K-64 Read: 324.57 MB/s
4K-64 Write: 290.24 MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.128 ms
Access Time Write: 0.179 ms
Score Read: 399 Points
Score Write: 382 Points
Score Total: 988 Points
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
NVIDIA Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5), Intel Core i5-6300U
2031 Points ∼100% +168%
Microsoft Surface Laptop
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
789 Points ∼39% +4%
Cube Thinker m3
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30
757 Points ∼37%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
NVIDIA Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5), Intel Core i5-6300U
11340 Points ∼100% +92%
Microsoft Surface Laptop
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
6539 Points ∼58% +11%
Cube Thinker m3
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30
5911 Points ∼52%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
5510 Points ∼49% -7%
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
5076 Points ∼45% -14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Microsoft Surface Laptop
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
43637 Points ∼100% +31%
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
NVIDIA Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5), Intel Core i5-6300U
38293 Points ∼88% +15%
Cube Thinker m3
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30
33229 Points ∼76%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
NVIDIA Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5), Intel Core i5-6300U
123411 Points ∼100% +69%
Microsoft Surface Laptop
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
76530 Points ∼62% +4%
Cube Thinker m3
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30
73237 Points ∼59%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
NVIDIA Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5), Intel Core i5-6300U
82606 Points ∼100% +43%
Microsoft Surface Laptop
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
65549 Points ∼79% +13%
Cube Thinker m3
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30
57778 Points ∼70%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Physics
Microsoft Surface Laptop
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
35640 Points ∼100% +20%
Cube Thinker m3
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30
29788 Points ∼84%
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
NVIDIA Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5), Intel Core i5-6300U
21421 Points ∼60% -28%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Microsoft Surface Laptop
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
33260 Points ∼100% +14%
Cube Thinker m3
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30
29224 Points ∼88%
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
NVIDIA Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5), Intel Core i5-6300U
15597 Points ∼47% -47%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Score
Microsoft Surface Laptop
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
33761 Points ∼100% +15%
Cube Thinker m3
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30
29347 Points ∼87%
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
NVIDIA Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5), Intel Core i5-6300U
16599 Points ∼49% -43%
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
4571 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
682 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
317 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
180 points
Help
BioShock Infinite - 1280x720 Very Low Preset
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
Maxwell GPU (940M, GDDR5), 6300U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe
94.2 fps ∼100% +200%
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP
38.9 fps ∼41% +24%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128
36.4 fps ∼39% +16%
Cube Thinker m3
HD Graphics 615, 7Y30
31.45 fps ∼33%
low med. high ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 31.4517.6414.154.57fps

Noise Level

Idle
30.6 / 30.6 / 31.6 dB(A)
Load
30.6 / 30.6 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 30.6 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.329.435.63529.3252928.733.328.2293129.129.43225.429.14030.526.632.329.830.55033.632.634.428.533.66332.132.432.428.932.18031.32930.129.131.310028.92729.428.928.912527.724.725.928.427.716026.824.626.22726.82002626.12623.82625023.32224.122.723.33152323.62421.92340021.9212220.921.95002121.421.920.52163020.720.121.519.520.780019.819.820.418.419.8100018.818.720.118.218.8125018.817.819.717.818.8160018.51819.11818.5200018.117.618.717.818.1250017.717.418.617.817.7315017.317.518.817.917.3400017.117.218.517.917.1500016.917.718.21816.963001717.618.31817800016.917.418.317.916.91000016.917.518.617.816.91250016.917.818.517.716.91600017.319.41917.817.3SPL30.830.731.730.730.8N1.51.51.71.51.5median 18.8Cube Thinker m3median 18.7median 19.7median 18median 18.8Delta2.92.42.42.12.9hearing rangehide median Fan Noise
Max. Load
 40.7 °C32.2 °C28.3 °C 
 40.8 °C32.8 °C28.2 °C 
 36 °C30.1 °C28.1 °C 
Maximum: 40.8 °C
Average: 33 °C
29.6 °C33.9 °C40.5 °C
29.3 °C32.8 °C41 °C
28.6 °C31.8 °C35.2 °C
Maximum: 41 °C
Average: 33.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  37.3 °C | Room Temperature 23.1 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2044.93544.92539.328.239.33134.925.434.94037.129.837.1503928.5396338.728.938.7803529.13510037.928.937.912537.928.437.916038273820038.323.838.325040.122.740.131544.121.944.140047.220.947.250051.720.551.763057.319.557.380060.318.460.3100064.318.264.3125057.917.857.9160055.21855.2200062.717.862.7250058.317.858.3315062.917.962.9400063.717.963.7500062.31862.3630056.11856.1800048.817.948.81000043.717.843.71250045.617.745.61600051.517.851.5SPL72.330.772.3N27.81.527.8median 51.7Cube Thinker m3median 18median 51.7Delta8.32.18.335.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Cube Thinker m3 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (64 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.33 / 0.31 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 4.5 / 10.3 / 11.5 Watt
Load midlight 23.3 / 21.1 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Cube Thinker m3
7Y30, HD Graphics 615, , IPS, 3000x2000, 13.5
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Lite-On CV1-8B128, IPS with 72% NTSC, 1920x1080, 13.3
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2304x1440, 12
Power Consumption
23%
23%
32%
Idle Minimum *
4.5
3.7
18%
3.4
24%
2.7
40%
Idle Average *
10.3
7.4
28%
7
32%
2.7
74%
Idle Maximum *
11.5
8.2
29%
7.6
34%
7.2
37%
Load Average *
23.3
17
27%
19
18%
22
6%
Load Maximum *
21.1
18.6
12%
20.1
5%
20.5
3%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
10h 10min
WiFi Surfing v1.3
4h 13min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 12min
Cube Thinker m3
7Y30, HD Graphics 615, 50 Wh
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5
6300U, Maxwell GPU (940M, GDDR5), 78 Wh
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 38 Wh
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 54 Wh
Battery Runtime
50%
156%
67%
Reader / Idle
610
1070
75%
1072
76%
1027
68%
WiFi v1.3
253
402
59%
805
218%
386
53%
Load
132
153
16%
362
174%
239
81%
H.264
604
696

Pros

+ 明亮的高分辨率屏幕
+ 优雅的设计
+ 坚固的铝外壳
+ 无风扇结构
+ 维修方便
+ 大触摸板
+ 指纹传感器
+ 良好的存储配件
+ 足够的连接口
+ 非常实惠
+ USB-C

Cons

- 没有保修
- 屏幕胶合不足
- 键盘不能给人一种可信赖的印象
- 电池续航不佳
- 电源运行期间嗡嗡作响
- 比较重
In the test: the Cube Thinker
In the test: the Cube Thinker

酷比魔方Thinker是一台典型的中国笔记本电脑:有很多炫目的闪光点,但在其他时候,难免有所不足。成功打动人心的设计,与一个有些毛病的屏幕(可以被修复)和具有不同的高度按键的键盘形成对比。由于电池续航时间短,用户不能长时间享受其良好的性能。而充电噪音可能会让那些敏感的用户感到烦恼。

优点在于,在这个价格下,它拥有一很好的显示效果、强大的基础、优秀的性能。更重要的是:一个无与伦比的价格。同样,缺少保修这点也是在购买时应该被考虑的因素。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里

Cube Thinker m3 - 06/29/2017 v6
Florian Schaar

Chassis
79 /  98 → 81%
Keyboard
73%
Pointing Device
83%
Connectivity
48 / 80 → 60%
Weight
67 / 78 → 74%
Battery
76%
Display
91%
Games Performance
53 / 68 → 78%
Application Performance
70 / 87 → 80%
Temperature
91 / 91 → 100%
Noise
94%
Audio
76 / 91 → 83%
Camera
42 / 85 → 49%
Average
73%
80%
Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 酷比魔方 Thinker Laptop (Core m3-7Y30, 8 GB, 256 GB) 笔记本电脑简短评测
Florian Schaar, 2017-07-28 (Update: 2017-07-29)