Notebookcheck

戴尔 XPS 13 9365 (7Y54, QHD+) 变形本简短评测

Sascha Mölck (translated by Kangfei Zheng), 06/04/2017
Convertible / 2-in-1 Kaby Lake Touchscreen Windows

优秀显示效果。在13.3英寸XPS 13变形本中,戴尔押注在锐利的QHD+ 显示屏上,它的色彩表现良好。然而,与XPS 13 FHD型号相比,屏幕显着降低了电池续航时间。由于被动冷却的处理器,电脑总是能安静地运行。

Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 (XPS 13 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-7Y54
Graphics adapter
Intel HD Graphics 615, Core: 300-950 MHz, 双通道, 21.20.16.4664
Memory
8192 MB 
, DDR3 1866, dual channel, no memory slots, memory is soldered in
Display
13.3 inch 16:9, 3200x1800 pixel 276 PPI, 电容屏,10点触控, Sharp LQ133Z1, IPS, glossy: yes
Mainboard
Intel Kaby Lake-Y Premium PCH
Storage
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, 256 GB 
, 200 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: combo audio, Card Reader: microSD, Sensors: 运动传感器, TPM 2.0
Networking
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 15 x 304 x 200
Battery
46 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 巧克力键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, USB-C to USB-A adapter, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
1.2 kg, Power Supply: 255 g
Price
1649 Euro

 

Size Comparison

290
cd/m²
316
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
306
cd/m²
348
cd/m²
333
cd/m²
277
cd/m²
300
cd/m²
273
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 348 cd/m² Average: 306.4 cd/m² Minimum: 20 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 78 %
Center on Battery: 348 cd/m²
Contrast: 1740:1 (Black: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.79 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3.47 | - Ø
93% sRGB (Argyll) 60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.54
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1
IPS, 3200x1800, 13.3
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx
IPS, 3840x2160, 13.3
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE
IPS, 3840x2160, 13.9
Response Times
-9%
-1%
9%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
48 (26, 22)
48 (16.4, 31.6)
-0%
42 (20.8, 21.2)
12%
46 (14, 32)
4%
Response Time Black / White *
28 (16, 12)
32.8 (7.6, 25.2)
-17%
32 (18, 14)
-14%
24 (6, 18)
14%
PWM Frequency
1042 (29)
Screen
-42%
-1%
-46%
Brightness
306
306
0%
282
-8%
310
1%
Brightness Distribution
78
91
17%
83
6%
80
3%
Black Level *
0.2
0.19
5%
0.25
-25%
0.25
-25%
Contrast
1740
1698
-2%
1210
-30%
1392
-20%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.79
7.7
-176%
2.4
14%
7.86
-182%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.47
7.9
-128%
2.8
19%
8.25
-138%
Gamma
2.54 94%
2.88 83%
2.2 109%
2.05 117%
CCT
6564 99%
7044 92%
6333 103%
6834 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
44.1
-26%
65.5
9%
58
-3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
93
69.9
-25%
97.1
4%
90
-3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-26% / -35%
-1% / -1%
-19% / -35%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8568 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16 ms rise
↘ 12 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26 ms rise
↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (42.5 ms).
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4838
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
8946
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6388
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
119 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
257 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
24.79 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Help
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE
Intel Core i7-7500U
147 Points ∼74% +24%
HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx
Intel Core i7-7500U
143 Points ∼72% +20%
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-7Y75
130 Points ∼65% +9%
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1
Intel Core i5-7Y54
119 Points ∼60%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE
Intel Core i7-7500U
354 Points ∼16% +38%
HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx
Intel Core i7-7500U
317 Points ∼15% +23%
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-7Y75
258 Points ∼12% 0%
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1
Intel Core i5-7Y54
257 Points ∼12%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx
Intel Core i7-7500U
5614 Points ∼63% +16%
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-7Y75
5496 Points ∼62% +14%
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1
Intel Core i5-7Y54
4838 Points ∼55%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx
Intel Core i7-7500U
11366 Points ∼23% +27%
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-7Y75
9392 Points ∼19% +5%
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1
Intel Core i5-7Y54
8946 Points ∼18%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1
Intel Core i5-7Y54
6178 Points ∼20%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1
Intel Core i5-7Y54
3160 Points ∼68%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1
Intel Core i5-7Y54
6627 Points ∼24%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1
Intel Core i5-7Y54
3733 Points ∼65%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1
Intel Core i5-7Y54
6921 Points ∼27%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1
Intel Core i5-7Y54
3745 Points ∼63%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE
Intel Core i7-7500U
241.79 Points ∼0% +22%
HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx
Intel Core i7-7500U
235 Points ∼0% +18%
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1
Intel Core i5-7Y54
198.92 Points ∼0%
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-7Y75
193.76 Points ∼0% -3%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
2706 points
Help
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
3555 Points ∼59% +31%
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
HD Graphics 615, 7Y75, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
3134 Points ∼52% +16%
HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
3023 Points ∼51% +12%
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
2706 Points ∼45%
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
Sequential Read: 1159 MB/s
Sequential Write: 324.1 MB/s
512K Read: 528.4 MB/s
512K Write: 373.7 MB/s
4K Read: 29.26 MB/s
4K Write: 108.3 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 335.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 234.1 MB/s
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
31%
114%
58%
Write 4k QD32
234.1
250.2
7%
225.6
-4%
488.7
109%
Read 4k QD32
335.9
411
22%
518.3
54%
570.3
70%
Write 4k
108.3
121.2
12%
139.4
29%
159.7
47%
Read 4k
29.26
32.93
13%
54.66
87%
43.5
49%
Write 512
373.7
410.7
10%
1229
229%
579.6
55%
Read 512
528.4
966.3
83%
864.8
64%
701.1
33%
Write Seq
324.1
629.4
94%
1550
378%
578.4
78%
Read Seq
1159
1206
4%
2065
78%
1412
22%
3DMark 11 Performance
1272 points
Help
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U
1623 Points ∼3% +38%
HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U
1569 Points ∼3% +34%
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-7Y75
1370 Points ∼3% +17%
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
1175 Points ∼2%
low med. high ultra
Diablo III (2012) 55.836.330.117.8fps
Counter-Strike: GO (2012) 99.957.339.521.9fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 31.420.419.36.1fps
GRID: Autosport (2014) 74.924.6fps
F1 2014 (2014) 5534fps
GTA V (2015) 19.916.7fps
World of Warships (2015) 49.930.2fps
Anno 2205 (2015) 15.910.2fps
Rainbow Six Siege (2015) 24.616.2fps
Far Cry Primal (2016) 125fps
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) 15.59fps
Civilization VI (2016) 20.69.2fps
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) 70.245.1fps
Titanfall 2 (2016) 19.915.9fps
Resident Evil 7 (2017) 22.29.5fps
For Honor (2017) 16.86.2fps
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) 9.84fps
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III (2017) 11.64fps
Prey (2017) 14.36.6fps
Max. Load
 40.2 °C43.1 °C32 °C 
 32.1 °C36.4 °C32 °C 
 26.8 °C26.7 °C26.1 °C 
Maximum: 43.1 °C
Average: 32.8 °C
32.4 °C41.7 °C37.7 °C
30.1 °C34.4 °C35.9 °C
26 °C28.8 °C30 °C
Maximum: 41.7 °C
Average: 33 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41.2 °C | Room Temperature 30.1 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.736.241.72538.732.238.73140.331.740.34041.12941.15042.628.842.66344.530.844.5804428.34410045.728.945.71254724.54716048.22448.220049.924.649.925051.522.151.531556.52256.540059.720.859.750064.420.364.463065.619.365.68006918.669100072.717.972.7125073.517.773.5160071.61771.6200071.417.171.4250069.616.969.6315064.61764.6400067.416.967.4500066.616.966.6630069.91769.9800067.617.267.61000059.317.159.3125005717.2571600052.517.452.5SPL81.43081.4N50.81.450.8median 64.6Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1median 17.7median 64.6Delta7.627.635.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 20%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.5 / 1.3 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 8.2 / 10.8 / 12.7 Watt
Load midlight 22.6 / 24.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Battery Runtime
WiFi Surfing v1.3 (Edge 40)
6h 50min
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing 1.3
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
7Y75, HD Graphics 615, 46 Wh
686 min ∼100% +67%
Lenovo Yoga 910-13IKB-80VF004CGE
7500U, HD Graphics 620, 78 Wh
644 min ∼94% +57%
HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx
7500U, HD Graphics 620, 57.8 Wh
537 min ∼78% +31%
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1
7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 46 Wh
410 min ∼60%

Pros

+ 外观小巧
+ 显示屏视角稳定
+ NVMe 固态硬盘
+ 雷电3
+ USB Type-C到Type-A电源适配器

Cons

- 平庸的电池续航
- 没有USB Type-A端口
- WLAN传输速度较低
The Dell XPS 13 9365-4537, provided by notebooksbilliger.de
The Dell XPS 13 9365-4537, provided by notebooksbilliger.de

我们所测试戴尔 XPS 13是配备 酷睿 i5-7Y54 处理器的机型。它并没有比 同系列机型 上配备的名义上更强酷睿i7差别不大。毕竟,由于被动冷却,两个处理器都难以达到最大速度,在测试结果中,它们很大程度上处于同一水平。酷睿i7只能被证明在日常操作中有几乎无法注意的轻微优势。为酷睿i7处理器的支付额外费用并不值得。

由于没有风扇,电脑总是能安静地运行。而温度却不会太高。NVMe固态硬盘可确保系统的快速运行。更好固态硬盘是可行的。为此,您需要卸下计算机的底部外壳。该机的键盘同样留下了良好的整体印象。

IPS显示屏具有稳定的视角和非常好的对比度。亮度值也不错,尽管它可以更高,因为该设备将被应用于各种照明条件下的不同场合。

锐利的QHD +显示屏对电池续航有负面影响。

在专业的无线连接测试中,对比 全高清版本的XPS 13,电池续航时间减少了5个小时。那些需要长续航时间的用户,可以考虑选购全高清版本的机型。该机价格大约在7000元左右

 

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里

Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 - 05/26/2017 v6
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
91 / 98 → 93%
Keyboard
87%
Pointing Device
87%
Connectivity
58 / 80 → 73%
Weight
73 / 78 → 87%
Battery
89%
Display
87%
Games Performance
53 / 68 → 78%
Application Performance
73 / 87 → 84%
Temperature
94%
Noise
100%
Audio
80 / 91 → 88%
Camera
44 / 85 → 52%
Average
78%
87%
Convertible - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 戴尔 XPS 13 9365 (7Y54, QHD+) 变形本简短评测
Sascha Mölck, 2017-06- 4 (Update: 2017-06- 8)