Notebookcheck Logo
Teclast Art Pad Pro

配备触控笔和金属外壳的经济实惠型 12.7 英寸平板电脑 - Teclast Art Pad Pro 评测

成本不到 300 欧元。

Teclast Art Pad Pro 尺寸为 12.7 英寸，价格极具竞争力。它配备的手写笔支持 4096 级压力。该平板电脑还具有 256 GB 存储容量、双卡双待、多种图片模式和专用功能键，因此用途广泛。
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android Tablet Touchscreen

对 Teclast Art Pad Pro 的评价

Teclast Art Pad Pro 具有极高的性价比。不到 300 欧元的价格就能买到一款 12.7 英寸的平板电脑，配备耐用的金属外壳、256 GB 存储空间和 4 GB 内存，支持双卡双待。其他优点还包括无 PWM IPS 屏幕、4096 级压力的手写笔和可靠的电池续航时间。该平板电脑的 30 瓦电源充电速度也相当快。

art Pad Pro 只能部分实现其作为艺术家平板电脑的承诺。虽然您可以使用触控笔在其人性化的 7:5 屏幕上创作出令人印象深刻的绘画作品，但屏幕的色彩准确度还有待提高。

得益于 4 个扬声器和对 DRM Widevine L1 的支持，这款平板电脑在多媒体娱乐方面表现出色。最大的缺点是更新供应不明确，因为不保证每次更新都能以 90 Hz 以上的频率显示。

Pros

+ 大而实惠
+ 纤薄坚固的金属外壳
+ 附带 4096 级压力的触控笔
+ 带 microSD 和双卡的混合插槽
+ DRM Widevine L1
+ 良好的 GPS
+ 无 PWM 的 IPS 屏幕
+ 电池续航时间长
+ 充电功率 30 瓦

Cons

- 仅有 wiFi 5
- 只有 USB 2.0 端口
- 普通摄像头
- 只有 60 赫兹
- 显示屏色彩还原不准确
- 无指纹传感器
- 软件更新不明确

价格和供应情况

Teclast Art Pad Pro 目前在亚马逊上的售价为 290 欧元（约合 340 美元），有折扣券。

Amazon Logo
$279.99
TECLAST Artpadpro Android 15 Tablet, 12.7” 2176x1600 Display, 20GB+256GB, Gemini Ai, 10000mAh+30W Fast Charge, 13 inch Tablet with Widevine L1, 5G WiFi,4G LTE,GPS - Includes Pen
  • $18.99
    NOUKAJU [3pack] Screen Protector for TECLAST ArtPadPro Tablet 12.7inch, Paper Film,High Light Transmittance,Scratch,Paper Screen Protector for TECLAST Art Pad Pro
  • $16.98
    NOUKAJU Screen Protector for TECLAST ArtPadPro Tablet 12.7inch, Paper Film,High Light Transmittance,Scratch,Paper Screen Protector for TECLAST Art Pad Pro[2pack]

Teclast 推出的 Art Pad Pro 是一款引人入胜的平板电脑：售价 350 欧元（使用亚马逊优惠券可降至 300 欧元以下），配备 12.7 英寸显示屏、充足的内存、四个扬声器和 4G 连接。

正如产品名称所示，包装中还附带了一支手写笔，适用于绘画或素描。我们将对 Art Pad Pro 进行评测，看看它能否与同价位的其他产品相媲美。

规格

Teclast Art Pad Pro
Processor
Mediatek Helio G99 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G57 MP2
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR4
Display
12.70 inch 7:5, 2176 x 1600 pixel 213 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, native pen support, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB 
, 235 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Gravity, Proximity, Hall, Gyroscope, Compass, Camera2 API Limited, DRM Widevine L1
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (Band 2/3/5/8), 3G (Band 1/2/5/8), 4G (Band 1/3/5/7/8/20/34/38/39/40/41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.2 x 279 x 211
Battery
10000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 30W max. charging speed
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix LED Flash
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo speakers, Keyboard: virtual, Stylus, 30W charger, USB Type-C to USB Type-C cable, Guides, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, metal case; no HDR support; GPS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1), Beidou (B1); Connectivity: Dual Nano SIM + VoLTE; Bluetooth codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LDAC, LC3, Opus, LHDC V/V4, fanless
Weight
674 g, Power Supply: 58 g
Price
350 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳 - 带金属外壳的 Art Pad Pro

7.2 毫米扁平的 Art Pad Pro 采用哑光金属外壳，外观时尚，手感优质，重量仅为 672 克，对于同尺寸的平板电脑来说也很容易操作。此外，它几乎无法压入或弯曲，在尝试这样做时也不会发出任何声音。

这款平板电脑的显示屏边缘远没有 Teclast网站上显示的那么窄。.不过，这款平板电脑并不需要躲在竞争对手后面，因为它四边 9 毫米宽的边框给人一种相当现代的感觉，看起来并不比 iPad 11 (2025) 差。 Apple iPad 11（2025 年）.

尺寸比较

❌
361 mm 218 mm 5.7 mm 1.1 kg283 mm 186 mm 6.7 mm 600 g279 mm 211 mm 7.2 mm 674 g251.22 mm 173.42 mm 6.18 mm 500 g248.6 mm 179.5 mm 7 mm 477 g244.5 mm 154.3 mm 7 mm 467 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

功能 - Teclast 平板电脑，双卡双待，256 GB 存储空间

Teclast 为 Art Pad Pro 配备了 8GB RAM 和 256GB 内存，使用 microSD 卡最高可扩展至 1TB。此外，卡槽还可插入两张 nano-SIM 卡，使 Art Pad Pro 能够访问 4G 移动网络。

Teclast 平板电脑有四个扬声器，支持 DRM Widevine L1，可满足多媒体使用需求。USB-C 端口的速度仅限于 USB 2.0。

左：电源按钮，扬声器
左：电源按钮，扬声器
右：扬声器、USB-C 2.0、扬声器
右：扬声器、USB-C 2.0、扬声器
顶部：智能按钮、麦克风、混合双卡双待、麦克风、音量摇杆
顶部：智能按钮、麦克风、混合双卡双待、麦克风、音量摇杆
底部：无连接
底部：无连接

microSD 读卡器

使用我们的 Angelbird AV Pro microSD 参考卡，这款 microSD 读卡器表现出色，在复制测试中击败了一些同类设备。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Samsung Exynos 1280 (Angelbird V60)
47.6 MB/s +8%
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Mediatek Helio G99 (Angelbird V60)
44.2 MB/s
Acer Iconia X12
Mediatek Helio G99 (Angelbird V60)
37.5 MB/s -15%
Average of class Tablet
  (10.2 - 58.4, n=60, last 2 years)
36.6 MB/s -17%
azamp MES-B3
Mediatek Helio G99 (Angelbird V60)
33.9 MB/s -23%

跨平台磁盘测试 (CPDT)

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Teclast Art Pad Pro Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.4 (28.1-49.7)
Acer Iconia X12 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.2 (25-49)
azamp MES-B3 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø39.1 (28.9-46.5)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø31.8 (16.3-51.5)
Teclast Art Pad Pro Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø70.2 (14.2-83.3)
Acer Iconia X12 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø71.8 (12.8-79.7)
azamp MES-B3 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.7 (17.8-86.5)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø72.6 (43.2-109.9)

软件 -Android 15 并宣布更新 90 赫兹

Art Pad Pro 在Android 15 上运行，采用 Teclast 的 ArtOS 用户界面，该界面在大多数情况下与标准的Android UI 没有区别。不过，也有一些实用的额外功能，包括应用程序的分割视图和可直接启动应用程序的侧边栏。

智能按钮也提供了更多的灵活性。例如，该功能键可用于更改显示模式、启动应用程序或截图；该按钮的操作可在Android 设置中更改。

即使被问及此事，Teclast 也没有提供有关 Art Pad Pro 更新策略的具体细节。不过，这款平板电脑将在一个未公开的时间接受更新，将刷新率提高到 90 Hz。

Teclast Art Pad Pro
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Teclast Art Pad Pro

可持续性

有关该平板电脑二氧化碳排放量的信息暂缺。Art Pad Pro 采用塑料薄膜包装，目前尚不清楚包装中是否使用了可回收材料，如果使用，比例是多少。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 带有 WiFi 5 的 Art Pad Pro

Art Pad Pro 的 WiFi 5 采用的是老式的 WiFi 标准。不过，许多同价位的平板电脑也没有做得更好。当连接到我们的参考路由器--华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 时，传输速率也相对稳定。

Networking
Teclast Art Pad Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
235 (min: 163) MBit/s ∼24%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
332 (min: 215) MBit/s ∼38%
Acer Iconia X12
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
332 (min: 264) MBit/s ∼34%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
369 (min: 350) MBit/s ∼43%
azamp MES-B3
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
298 (min: 263) MBit/s ∼31%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
361 (min: 338) MBit/s ∼42%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
976 (min: 962) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
867 (min: 554) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
493 (min: 472) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
450 (min: 371) MBit/s ∼52%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
905 (min: 435) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
698 (min: 460) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1798 (min: 893) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1574 (min: 765) MBit/s ∼100%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
342 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼35%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
329 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼38%
Average of class Tablet
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
538 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
605 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1215 (min: 578) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1463 (min: 746) MBit/s ∼93%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
Teclast Art Pad Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø235 (163-306)
Apple iPad 11 (2025) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø976 (962-992)
Teclast Art Pad Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø332 (215-384)
Apple iPad 11 (2025) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø866 (554-892)
楼内 GPS 接收
楼内 GPS 接收
户外 GPS 接收
户外 GPS 接收

平板电脑通过卫星导航系统 GPS、Glonass、Galileo 和北斗确定自己的位置。

使用这么大的平板电脑进行导航是否合理，还有待观察。无论如何，实际测试表明，它完全适用于这一用途。与 Garmin Venu 2 健身智能手表相比，它几乎同样精确地记录了 4 公里的自行车骑行路线。

GPS 测试 Teclast Art Pad Pro：概述
GPS 测试 Teclast Art Pad Pro：概述
GPS 测试 Teclast Art Pad Pro：桥梁
GPS 测试 Teclast Art Pad Pro：桥梁
GPS 测试 Teclast Art Pad Pro：转折点
GPS 测试 Teclast Art Pad Pro：转折点
Garmin Venu 2：概述
Garmin Venu 2：概述
Garmin Venu 2：桥梁
Garmin Venu 2：桥梁
Garmin Venu 2：转折点
Garmin Venu 2：转折点

相机 - 足够拍摄快照

自拍相机拍摄的照片
自拍相机拍摄的照片

Art Pad 的 1300 万像素后置摄像头拍照效果并不理想。日光下的快照还可以，但由于颜色太淡而显得暗淡无光，缺乏细节，而且噪点较多。

主摄像头能以每秒 30 帧的速度录制高达 2K（2,560 x 1,440 像素）的视频，但由于没有光学防抖功能，需要稳定的手感。图像质量与照片相当。

前置 800 万像素自拍摄像头隐藏在显示屏边框中。自拍效果尚可，但与主摄像头一样，缺乏动态感。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow light
ColorChecker
7.7 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
15 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
11 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
7 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
9 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Teclast Art Pad Pro: 8.09 ∆E min: 3.12 - max: 15.05 ∆E
ColorChecker
30 ∆E
55.5 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
46.1 ∆E
62.8 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
65.5 ∆E
64.5 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
38.2 ∆E
77.1 ∆E
45 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
94.8 ∆E
71.7 ∆E
52.9 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Teclast Art Pad Pro: 47.61 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 94.84 ∆E

附件和保修 - 包括手写笔

Art Pad Pro 随附一支触控笔、一个 30 瓦电源适配器、一条 USB-C 连接线、一个 SIM 卡工具和一份快速入门指南。

Teclast Art Pad Pro 提供 24 个月的保修服务。

输入和操作 - 轻触按钮即可实现三种显示模式

触摸屏对输入的响应快速而精确，但由于刷新率为 60 赫兹，运行起来并不太流畅。此外，该平板电脑还可以使用触控笔进行操作，由于触控笔能够识别 4096 级压力，因此也适用于绘图。触控笔通过 USB-C 接口充电，并通过磁力吸附在平板电脑边框的上部。

除标准视图外，Art Pad Pro 还提供另外两种显示模式，可通过智能按钮进行选择。墨水模式具有类似纸张的显示效果，适合阅读电子书，而粉彩模式则大大降低了色彩饱和度。Teclast 建议将其用于阅读漫画等。

这款平板电脑没有指纹传感器，但可以通过面部解锁进行生物识别登录。在环境光线充足或显示屏足够亮的情况下，该功能可以可靠地工作。

横向键盘
横向键盘
纵向键盘
纵向键盘

显示屏 - 配备无 PWM IPS 屏幕的 Art Pad Pro

子像素结构
子像素结构

IPS 屏幕的分辨率为 2,176 x 1,600 像素，纵横比为 7:5（14:10），亮度调节无需 PWM，这一点会让敏感的用户感到满意。

IPS 屏幕的平均亮度为 269 cd/m²，为室内使用提供了足够的亮度，但仍略逊于竞争对手。在小图像区域（APL18），显示屏亮度可达 335 cd/m²。

277
cd/m²		290
cd/m²		285
cd/m²
253
cd/m²		291
cd/m²		266
cd/m²
272
cd/m²		238
cd/m²		251
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 291 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 269.2 cd/m² Minimum: 8.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 291 cd/m²
Contrast: 882:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 7.79 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.81}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 8 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
84.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.007
CCT: 8922 K
Teclast Art Pad Pro
IPS, 2176x1600, 12.7"		Acer Iconia X12
AMOLED, 2560x1600, 12.6"		azamp MES-B3
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Apple iPad 11 (2025)
IPS, 2360x1640, 10.9"		Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
TFT, 2000x1200, 10.4"		Xiaomi Pad 7
LCD, 3200x2136, 11.2"
Screen
17%
-9%
19%
57%
57%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
291
378
30%
296
2%
526
81%
486
67%
838
188%
Brightness (cd/m²)
269
356
32%
269
0%
531
97%
466
73%
815
203%
Brightness Distribution (%)
82
86
5%
83
1%
93
13%
92
12%
96
17%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
0.33
0.46
-39%
0.99
-200%
0.26
21%
0.88
-167%
Contrast (:1)
882
643
-27%
531
-40%
1869
112%
952
8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
7.79
7.11
9%
5.79
26%
1.9
76%
2.29
71%
1.8
77%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
10.97
10.75
2%
20.26
-85%
4
64%
6.82
38%
3.9
64%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
8
6.3
21%
3.7
54%
2.9
64%
2.8
65%
2.5
69%
Gamma
2.007 110%
2.21 100%
2.135 103%
2.14 103%
2.229 99%
2.25 98%
CCT
8922 73%
7323 89%
6145 106%
6982 93%
7145 91%
6912 94%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8228 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Art Pad Pro 主要用于绘画和图像编辑，但其图像质量难以令人信服。创意用户不得不承认，IPS 面板的色彩还原远远不够准确，而且还偏蓝。该显示屏提供四种色彩配置文件，但我们几乎看不出它们之间有什么区别。

色彩精度
色彩精度
色彩空间覆盖率
色彩空间覆盖率
灰度
灰度

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
24.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.1 ms rise
↘ 13.1 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 56 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.9 ms rise
↘ 15.1 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (31.8 ms).

尽管 Art Pad Pro 的亮度储备不是很高，但只要找到一个阴凉的地方，它也可以在户外使用。作为 IPS 面板的典型代表，显示屏具有相当不错的可视角度。

室外使用
室外使用
视角
视角

性能 - 配备联发科 Helio G99 的 Teclast 平板电脑

联发科 联发科 Helio G99虽然已经用了几年，但它还是为 Art Pad Pro 带来了稳定的性能。在日常使用中，很少出现问题，而 ARM Mali-G57 MC2-联发科八核处理器的 GPU 也使这款平板电脑适用于游戏。iPad Apple iPad 11（2025 年）和 小米 Pad 7表明，这个价位的平板电脑性能要强得多。

Geekbench 6.5 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AI Benchmark
Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 4-Core, 6144
2566 Points +255%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
1893 Points +162%
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=97, last 2 years)
1355 Points +87%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 4096
966 Points +34%
azamp MES-B3
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
728 Points +1%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (704 - 738, n=17)
724 Points 0%
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
723 Points
Acer Iconia X12
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
704 Points -3%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 4-Core, 6144
5939 Points +199%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
5089 Points +157%
Average of class Tablet
  (848 - 14690, n=97, last 2 years)
4321 Points +118%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 4096
2021 Points +2%
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1984 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1784 - 2065, n=17)
1955 Points -1%
azamp MES-B3
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1902 Points -4%
Acer Iconia X12
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1784 Points -10%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
1408366 Points +236%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 4-Core, 6144
1388868 Points +231%
Average of class Tablet
  (164396 - 2854581, n=67, last 2 years)
1025238 Points +144%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 4096
459194 Points +9%
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
419526 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (383511 - 422936, n=8)
405846 Points -3%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
15466 Points +64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 4096
12637 Points +34%
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 27428, n=84, last 2 years)
11707 Points +24%
azamp MES-B3
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
10333 Points +10%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (8885 - 11379, n=23)
9880 Points +5%
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
9436 Points
Acer Iconia X12
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
9192 Points -3%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
8323 Points +157%
Average of class Tablet
  (195 - 13159, n=63, last 2 years)
5271 Points +63%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 4096
3976 Points +23%
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3240 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (2855 - 3240, n=13)
3019 Points -7%
System
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
9977 Points +66%
Average of class Tablet
  (904 - 18343, n=63, last 2 years)
8552 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 4096
8365 Points +39%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (5261 - 6776, n=13)
6195 Points +3%
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
5998 Points
Memory
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
10045 Points +95%
Average of class Tablet
  (401 - 17963, n=63, last 2 years)
6249 Points +22%
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
5140 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 4096
3932 Points -24%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (3454 - 5140, n=13)
3826 Points -26%
Graphics
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
24169 Points +781%
Average of class Tablet
  (88 - 57192, n=63, last 2 years)
12804 Points +367%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 4096
5145 Points +88%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (2683 - 3002, n=13)
2807 Points +2%
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2743 Points
Web
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
1887 Points +45%
Average of class Tablet
  (10 - 2370, n=63, last 2 years)
1442 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 4096
1433 Points +10%
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1304 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1150 - 1325, n=13)
1256 Points -4%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
13965 Points +49%
Average of class Tablet
  (2597 - 74821, n=64, last 2 years)
13188 Points +40%
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
9397 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (6323 - 9695, n=12)
8609 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 4096
5087 Points -46%
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Tablet
  (66.1 - 8305, n=10, last 2 years)
1384 Points +1906%
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
69 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (n=1)
69 Points 0%
Score V6
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288
3671 Points +1700%
Average of class Tablet
  (70.4 - 12784, n=21, last 2 years)
2777 Points +1261%
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
204 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (68.9 - 204, n=3)
114.4 Points -44%
3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3107 Points +827%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
2559 Points +664%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
641 Points +91%
azamp MES-B3
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB eMMC Flash
361 Points +8%
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
335 Points
Acer Iconia X12
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
331 Points -1%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3098 Points +803%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
2611 Points +661%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
632 Points +84%
azamp MES-B3
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB eMMC Flash
356 Points +4%
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
343 Points
Acer Iconia X12
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
336 Points -2%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11654 Points +1003%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
10598 Points +903%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2268 Points +115%
azamp MES-B3
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1249 Points +18%
Acer Iconia X12
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
1201 Points +14%
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1057 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
974 Points +638%
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
132 Points
Acer Iconia X12
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
127 Points -4%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
987 Points +648%
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
132 Points
Acer Iconia X12
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
124 Points -6%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +173%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps +36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
59 fps +34%
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
44 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
501 fps +695%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
378.9 fps +501%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
95 fps +51%
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
63 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
111 fps +311%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps +122%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
56 fps +107%
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
27 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
297 fps +643%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
205.2 fps +413%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
63 fps +58%
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
63 fps +294%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps +275%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
38 fps +138%
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
198 fps +692%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
141.6 fps +466%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
42 fps +68%
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
57.6 fps +500%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
36 fps +275%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
21 fps +119%
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.6 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
113 fps +653%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
90.3 fps +502%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
25 fps +67%
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
40.9 fps +529%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
29 fps +346%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
14 fps +115%
azamp MES-B3
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps +69%
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.5 fps
Acer Iconia X12
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
5.4 fps -17%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50 fps +733%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
40.1 fps +568%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
10 fps +67%
azamp MES-B3
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB eMMC Flash
6 fps 0%
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6 fps
Acer Iconia X12
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
5.8 fps -3%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
55.9 fps +459%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
47 fps +370%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
20 fps +100%
azamp MES-B3
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB eMMC Flash
17 fps +70%
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10 fps
Acer Iconia X12
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
8.5 fps -15%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
131 fps +719%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
104.1 fps +551%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
27 fps +69%
Acer Iconia X12
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
16 fps 0%
azamp MES-B3
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps 0%
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
23 fps +900%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
16.7 fps +626%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
4.5 fps +96%
Acer Iconia X12
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
2.5 fps +9%
azamp MES-B3
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2.5 fps +9%
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.3 fps
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Apple iPad 11 (2025) (Chrome 135)
255.763 Points +183%
Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135)
187.643 Points +108%
Average of class Tablet (22.3 - 393, n=67, last 2 years)
137.6 Points +52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 (Chrome 124)
102.343 Points +13%
Teclast Art Pad Pro (Chrome 138.0.7204.179)
90.342 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (46.9 - 90.3, n=11)
69.7 Points -23%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 603, n=59, last 2 years)
173.3 runs/min +92%
Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135)
145 runs/min +61%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 (Chrome 124)
90.6 runs/min +1%
Teclast Art Pad Pro (Chrome 138.0.7204.179)
90.1 runs/min
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (24.1 - 90.1, n=11)
58.4 runs/min -35%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Apple iPad 11 (2025) (Chrome 135)
22.7 runs/min +262%
Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135)
15.9 runs/min +154%
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 36.8, n=56, last 2 years)
13.8 runs/min +120%
Teclast Art Pad Pro (Chrome 138.0.7204.179)
6.27 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 (Chrome 124)
5.3 runs/min -15%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (3.66 - 6.27, n=4)
4.85 runs/min -23%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPad 11 (2025) (Chrome 135)
236 Points +171%
Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135)
151 Points +74%
Average of class Tablet (26 - 315, n=72, last 2 years)
126 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 (Chrome 124)
114 Points +31%
Teclast Art Pad Pro (Chrome 138.0.7204.179)
87 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (39 - 89, n=12)
73.1 Points -16%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad 11 (2025) (Chrome 135)
74543 Points +189%
Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135)
66744 Points +159%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 111219, n=100, last 2 years)
37789 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 (Chrome 124)
32436 Points +26%
azamp MES-B3 (Chrome 138)
26476 Points +3%
Teclast Art Pad Pro (Chrome 138.0.7204.179)
25796 Points
Acer Iconia X12 (Chrome 135)
25533 Points -1%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (17228 - 26476, n=23)
21975 Points -15%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 27101, n=81, last 2 years)
2770 ms * -70%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1629 - 2444, n=12)
2004 ms * -23%
Teclast Art Pad Pro (Chrome 138.0.7204.179)
1628.6 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 (Chrome 124)
1287.1 ms * +21%
Xiaomi Pad 7 (Chrome 135)
564.8 ms * +65%
Apple iPad 11 (2025) (Chrome 135)
411.4 ms * +75%

* ... smaller is better

Teclast Art Pad Proazamp MES-B3Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024Xiaomi Pad 7Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-55%
-56%
167%
-3%
22%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)
1007.37
285.6
-72%
521.67
-48%
3911.82
288%
922 ?(482 - 1041, n=49)
-8%
1498 ?(126.9 - 4093, n=85, last 2 years)
49%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)
873.36
174.5
-80%
80.44
-91%
3387.43
288%
737 ?(369 - 943, n=49)
-16%
1112 ?(80.4 - 3773, n=85, last 2 years)
27%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)
237.46
146.6
-38%
167.23
-30%
311.09
31%
230 ?(99.7 - 295, n=49)
-3%
223 ?(20.1 - 475, n=85, last 2 years)
-6%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)
215.52
152.3
-29%
98.68
-54%
344.51
60%
247 ?(99.2 - 390, n=49)
15%
250 ?(9.1 - 745, n=85, last 2 years)
16%

游戏 - 限制运行

我们使用测试工具 Gamebench 和少量精选游戏，测试了当前游戏在 Art Pad Pro 上的运行情况。

通过《PUBG Mobile》，我们可以自信地说，这款游戏运行起来非常流畅，即使在高清设置下，这款战术射击游戏也能以流畅的 40 FPS 显示。相比之下，对图形要求更高的 "源氏冲击 "只能在较低的细节级别下运行。如果将所有图形设置调到最高，这款奇幻动作角色扮演游戏仍然可以玩，但平均运行速度仅为 27 FPS。

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Teclast Art Pad Pro; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 5.8.0_35245262_35356052: Ø51.5 (40-60)
Teclast Art Pad Pro; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 5.8.0_35245262_35356052: Ø27.2 (9-43)
Teclast Art Pad Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.9.0: Ø58.8 (53-60)
Teclast Art Pad Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.9.0: Ø39.7 (36-41)

排放 - 配备 4 个扬声器的超酷平板电脑

温度

在使用过程中，Art Pad Pro 保持凉爽的触感。即使在连续一小时的烧毁基准压力测试后，平板电脑表面的最高温度也只有 32 °C。此外，3DMark 压力测试表明，它几乎可以一直保持全性能。

Max. Load
 26.7 °C32 °C29.1 °C 
 25.2 °C25.5 °C25.8 °C 
 24.8 °C24.9 °C25 °C 
Maximum: 32 °C
Average: 26.6 °C
28.2 °C29.7 °C27.6 °C
27.4 °C28.8 °C27.4 °C
25.9 °C26.1 °C25.8 °C
Maximum: 29.7 °C
Average: 27.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.9 °C | Room Temperature 19 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.5 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMarkSteel Nomad 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
azamp MES-B3
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB eMMC Flash
99.6 % +1%
Acer Iconia X12
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
99.3 % +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
99.1 % +1%
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.6 %
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
90.8 % -8%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
86.9 % -12%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Acer Iconia X12
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
99.3 % 0%
azamp MES-B3
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB eMMC Flash
99.3 % 0%
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.2 %
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
98.2 % -1%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
90.7 % -9%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
89.4 % -10%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
A16 GPU 4-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
88.9 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Acer Iconia X12
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
99.2 % +1%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
98.6 % +1%
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
97.8 %
05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
Teclast Art Pad Pro Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.06 (2.05-2.07)
Acer Iconia X12 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.01 (2.01-2.02)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø16.8 (16.3-18.2)
Teclast Art Pad Pro Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø6.97 (6.93-7.03)
Acer Iconia X12 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.03 (7-7.04)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø61.4 (58.5-67.3)
Teclast Art Pad Pro Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø5.98 (5.9-6.02)
Teclast Art Pad Pro Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø0.993 (0.98-1.002)
Acer Iconia X12 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø0.947 (0.943-0.951)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø7.15 (7.1-7.2)
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Teclast Art Pad Pro

发言人

支持的蓝牙编解码器。
支持的蓝牙编解码器。

Teclast 平板电脑的四个扬声器虽然低音不足，但音质不错，中高音均衡。

可通过 USB-C 和蓝牙 5.2 连接外置音频设备。不错：Art Pad Pro 支持许多当前的蓝牙编解码器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.6432538.143.63131.436.14034.333.35036.333.86329.226.18020.624.410022.735.412521.446.216021.556.720019.659.825016.162.831514.870.440013.763.750016.867.563022.27580022.977.3100018.277.1125015.478.3160017.377.2200015.878.3250015.378.3315016.573.6400018.668.550002466.6630022.667.9800025.671.71000021.571.81250023.1611600022.856.4SPL32.687.2N1.670.8median 19.6median 70.4Delta3.67.143.738.433.236.829.331.532.336.640.737.532.629.119.726.916.933.115.538.313.343.89.643.311.843.39.248.28.754.11156.313.25613.757.914.862.913.764.710.666.110.961.912.363.913.762.613.660.713.963.114.464.315.666.815.969.61661.716.754.525.875.70.736.1median 13.7median 60.72.17.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseTeclast Art Pad ProSamsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Teclast Art Pad Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.2% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 2 小时充满电

耗电量

Art Pad Pro 的 10,000 mAh 电池充电功率可达 30 瓦。在测试中，一个完整的充电周期大约需要 2 小时。充电 50% 需要 46 分钟，充电 80% 需要 1 小时 16 分钟。

测定的耗电量表明，Teclast 平板电脑的能源储备并不十分经济。特别是在闲置时，它的耗电量明显高于对比设备。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 5.6 / 6.1 / 6.4 Watt
Load midlight 10 / 11.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Teclast Art Pad Pro
10000 mAh		Apple iPad 11 (2025)
7698 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
7040 mAh		Xiaomi Pad 7
8850 mAh		Average Mediatek Helio G99
 		Average of class Tablet
 
Power Consumption
-0%
66%
57%
54%
26%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)
5.6
1.43
74%
1.2
79%
0.74
87%
1.573 ?(0.7 - 5.6, n=12)
72%
2 ?(0.7 - 5.6, n=79, last 2 years)
64%
Idle Average * (Watt)
6.1
7.16
-17%
1.4
77%
1.72
72%
2.31 ?(1.1 - 6.1, n=12)
62%
3.77 ?(1 - 9.2, n=79, last 2 years)
38%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)
6.4
7.2
-13%
1.8
72%
1.74
73%
2.55 ?(1.31 - 6.4, n=12)
60%
4.11 ?(1.3 - 9.5, n=79, last 2 years)
36%
Load Average * (Watt)
10
11.23
-12%
2.5
75%
7.26
27%
5.46 ?(2.9 - 10, n=12)
45%
9.13 ?(2.5 - 34.9, n=75, last 2 years)
9%
Load Maximum * (Watt)
11.2
15.03
-34%
8.3
26%
8.11
28%
7.84 ?(4.8 - 11.2, n=12)
30%
12.9 ?(4.6 - 41.6, n=75, last 2 years)
-15%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Teclast Art Pad Pro Mediatek Helio G99; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø10.2 (10-10.3)
Apple iPad 11 (2025) Apple A16 Bionic; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd; Geekbench 6.4: Ø6.25 (2.65-15.7)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Samsung Exynos 1280; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.36 (1.921-8.29)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.53 (0.924-8.1)
Teclast Art Pad Pro Mediatek Helio G99; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø6.02 (5.91-6.24)
Apple iPad 11 (2025) Apple A16 Bionic; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.87 (2.83-3.05)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Samsung Exynos 1280; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.378 (1.251-2.27)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.76 (0.702-1.424)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112Tooltip
Teclast Art Pad Pro Mediatek Helio G99; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.1 (11-11.1)
Apple iPad 11 (2025) Apple A16 Bionic; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.7 (10.6-12.3)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Samsung Exynos 1280; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.81 (2.42-5.5)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.05 (7.98-8.09)
Teclast Art Pad Pro Mediatek Helio G99; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø6.02 (5.91-6.24)
Apple iPad 11 (2025) Apple A16 Bionic; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.87 (2.83-3.05)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024 Samsung Exynos 1280; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.378 (1.251-2.27)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.76 (0.702-1.424)

电池寿命

在实际电池测试中，Art Pad Pro 表现出色。在 WLAN 测试场景下，它可以持续使用 10 个小时。因此，在沙发上冲浪一天是完全可能的。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
10h 08min
Teclast Art Pad Pro
10000 mAh		Acer Iconia X12
10000 mAh		azamp MES-B3
12000 mAh		Apple iPad 11 (2025)
7698 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
7040 mAh		Xiaomi Pad 7
8850 mAh
Battery Runtime
38%
74%
5%
25%
79%
WiFi v1.3 (h)
10.1
13.9
38%
17.6
74%
10.6
5%
12.6
25%
18.1
79%
Reader / Idle (h)
51
41.4
H.264 (h)
15.7
20.8
Load (h)
4.8
4

Notebookcheck 总体评分

Teclast Art Pad Pro 具有良好的性价比，作为多媒体平板电脑表现出色，还提供手写笔作为奖励。不过，它的一大缺点是更新供应不明确。

Teclast Art Pad Pro - 08/13/2025 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
84 / 98 → 86%
Keyboard
73 / 80 → 91%
Pointing Device
88%
Connectivity
44 / 69 → 63%
Weight
80 / 40-88 → 84%
Battery
88%
Display
71%
Games Performance
5 / 65 → 8%
Application Performance
56 / 92 → 61%
AI Performance
4%
Temperature
96%
Noise
100%
Audio
73 / 91 → 80%
Camera
56 / 90 → 62%
Average
54%
76%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
25%
Power Use
91.5%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
10%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 31.9%

可比较的替代品

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
75.8%
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Teclast Art Pad Pro
Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1		Amazon:
1. $279.99
TECLAST Artpadpro Android 15...
2. $18.99
NOUKAJU [3pack] Screen Prote...
3. $16.98
NOUKAJU Screen Protector for...
List Price: 350 Euro		674 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash12.70"
2176x1600
213 PPI
IPS
2.
74.9%
Acer Iconia X12
Acer Iconia X12
Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB eMMC		Amazon:
1. $11.90
Case Compatible for Acer Ico...
2. $9.99
Oshmirian Screen Protector f...
3. $9.97
KONXISA 1-Pack Screen Protec...
List Price: 419€		600 g256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash12.60"
2560x1600
240 PPI
AMOLED
3.
72.1%
azamp MES-B3
azamp MES-B3
Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘
6 GB Memory, 128 GB eMMC		Amazon: $399.99
List Price: 399€		1.1 kg128 GB eMMC Flash15.60"
1920x1080
141 PPI
IPS
4.
83.9%
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
Apple iPad 11 (2025)
Apple A16 Bionic ⎘
Apple A16 GPU 4-Core ⎘
6 GB Memory, 128 GB NVMe		Amazon:
1. $319.00
Apple iPad 11-inch: A16 chip...
2. $699.00
Apple iPad Air 11-inch with ...
3. $6.98
Ailun Screen Protector for i...
List Price: 399€		477 g128 GB NVMe10.86"
2360x1640
265 PPI
IPS
5.
85.3% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024
Samsung Exynos 1280 ⎘
ARM Mali-G68 MP4 ⎘
4 GB Memory, 64 GB UFS 2.0		Amazon: $293.50
List Price: 429€		467 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash10.40"
2000x1200
224 PPI
TFT
6.
85.9%
Xiaomi Pad 7
Xiaomi Pad 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 732 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $389.80
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ai WiFi Version...
2. $649.99
XIAOMI Pad 7 Pro Ai WiFi Ver...
3. $394.49
XIAOMI Pad 7 Ai WiFi Version...
List Price: 400€		500 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash11.20"
3200x2136
344 PPI
LCD

More articles related to this device

Teclast Art Pad Pro (Art Pad Series)
News
•
物美价廉的 XXL 平板电脑：对 Teclast Art Pad Pro 的评价

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 配备触控笔和金属外壳的经济实惠型 12.7 英寸平板电脑 - Teclast Art Pad Pro 评测
Manuel Masiero, 2025-08-17 (Update: 2025-08-17)