结论 - 三星Galaxy Tab A11
尚未开发的潜力。三星似乎不得不用 "三星Galaxy Tab A11 采用了Galaxy Tab A9 的设计 "这样委婉的说法来掩饰自己的乏善可陈。
尽管考虑到Galaxy Tab A11 的实惠价格区间,我们不能期望它创造奇迹,但其永恒设计的金属机身和相当窄的屏幕边框创造了一款好看的平板电脑--尽管设计没有变化。
与其他厂商的同类平板电脑相比,其性能也依然令人印象深刻。不过,您仍然需要忍受卡顿和冗长的加载时间。
电池容量较小,续航能力依然一般。不过,90 Hz 显示屏比前代产品有了明显提升,前置摄像头的自拍效果也略有改善。
更新情况值得商榷,但我们应该期待几年的支持。
虽然我们希望看到更多切实的改进,但Galaxy Tab A11 仍然是一款极具吸引力和实用性的入门级平板电脑,支持 GPS 跟踪和可选的 LTE。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
截至发稿时,这款平板电脑尚未在三星在线商店上架。
该平板电脑不久也将在亚马逊上销售。
廉价、便携一直是Galaxy Tab A 背后的理念,2025 年,这款平板电脑几乎没有什么变化。尽管事实上从未有过Galaxy Tab A10,这意味着其前身 Galaxy Tab A9已经有两年多的历史了。
不过,Tab A10 还是有一些微小的改进,我们的目标是了解这些改进对日常使用的影响。
规格
外壳 - 金属,带塑料条
在其网站上,三星声称Galaxy Tab A11 "采用 "了其前代产品 Tab A9 的设计。 Galaxy Tab A9.另一种说法是,它只是重复使用了相同的机身,没有做任何改动:尺寸完全一样,外观也没有变化,但官方称 Tab A11 重了 3 克。虽然这在日常使用中并不会引起你的注意。
继续使用标志性设计并不一定是坏事。Galaxy Tab A11 与前代产品一样,采用了金属后壳。不过,为了更好地接收天线信号而采用的侧面粗塑料条可以做得更隐蔽一些,正面的屏占比也只有 81%,相当一般。
Galaxy Tab A11 拿在手里还算稳定,做工也不错。在试图扭动它时,可能会发出吱吱嘎嘎的声音,屏幕的液晶上也会看到适度的压力。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
特点 - 空间不大
Galaxy Tab A11 的有趣之处在于再次推出了 LTE 版本。令人不太满意的是,与两年前的Galaxy Tab A9 相比,有限的存储容量没有变化。以下是英国 WiFi 机型的确认售价:
- Galaxy Tab A11 WiFi| 64 GB| 4 GB内存| 149英镑
- Galaxy Tab A11 WiFi| 128 GB| 8 GB内存| 189英镑
我们评测的是配备 64 GB 存储空间和 Wi-Fi 的机型。
它还配备了一个 USB-C 端口,内部使用 USB 2.0 协议,允许的最大数据传输速率为 480 Mbps。这就避免了有线视频信号的传输。
microSD 读卡器
至少三星安装了 microSD 读卡器,允许用户在需要时扩展有限的存储空间。
实际上,读卡器传输数据的速度相对较快,这意味着我们可以放心地推荐它作为额外的存储选项。
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 (Angelbird V60) | |
Lenovo Tab (Angelbird V60) | |
Average of class Tablet (10.2 - 57.4, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Angelbird V60) | |
Lenovo Tab M9 (Angelbird V60) |
跨平台磁盘测试 (CPDT)
软件 - 更新情况不明确
三星在其Galaxy Tab A11 上预装了Android 15,并覆盖了其专有的 OneUI 7.0 版用户界面。安全补丁可以追溯到 2025 年 8 月的这次评测,需要再次更新。据说这些补丁每季度发布一次。
关于承诺的更新时间,我们很难找到任何相关信息。实际上,三星已经走得很远,明确承诺许多机型的软件更新将持续数年。但是,我们在Galaxy Tab A11 的官方网站上却找不到这样的承诺。在这篇评论发表之前,我们就这一问题向三星公司提出的请求也没有得到答复。
时隔两年,前代产品至少更新到了Android 16,所以你也可以期待Galaxy Tab A11 至少再有两个操作系统版本。不过,由于三星严格限制其对价格相近的Galaxy A17 的更新承诺,Tab A11 可能会遭遇类似的命运。
可持续性
更新可用性的不确定性可能会妨碍延长使用时间。不过,三星的确披露Galaxy Tab A11 没有使用回收材料。不过,目前还没有进一步的可持续发展数据。
在三星的官方替换零件商店中,你可以找到前代产品的零件、可以找到前代产品的部件,这意味着Galaxy Tab A11 也应该很快就会出现在这里。
包装不使用塑料,非常平整,从而减少了运输过程中的二氧化碳排放量。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 还提供 LTE 型号
WiFi 5 是现有最快的 Wi-Fi 标准,在这个价位的产品中很常见。我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 参考路由器进行的测试速度还可以接受,不过偶尔会出现数据速率下降的情况。
此外,预计传输速度只有 200 Mbps 左右。接收速度约为 300 Mbps。这应该足以满足日常互联网使用的需要,但如果希望充分利用千兆互联网连接的优势,就必须另辟蹊径了。
此外,还提供通过蜂窝网络访问移动互联网的 WWAN 型号,但我们只收到了用于测试的 WiFi 型号。Galaxy Tab A11 仍然不支持现代 5G,即使是 WWAN 机型也最多只能支持 LTE。
Networking | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Tab | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Tab M9 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Average of class Tablet | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
摄像头 - 为前置摄像头增加几个像素
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Front camera plantFront camera environmentFront camera low light主摄像头还必须在实验室中证明自己的性能--一次是在全棚照明下,另一次是在仅有 1 勒克斯的条件下。
一旦光照度过低,图像就会变得模糊,即使是光线充足的照片,边缘也会很快变得模糊。红色背景下的文字也会很快失去对比度。


配件和保修 - 2 年放心保修
包装盒内没有充电器,但有一根 USB 数据线和一个 SIM 卡工具。
在德国,三星为其经济型平板电脑提供 2 年 保修
输入设备和操作 - 输入速度更快
显示屏--大表面上的小像素
|
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 453 cd/m²
Contrast: 1461:1 (Black: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 6.87 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.8}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 6.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
78.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.216
CCT: 8458 K
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 IPS, 1340x800, 8.7" | Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 LCD TFT, 1340x800, 8.7" | Lenovo Tab IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches IPS, 1340x800, 8.7" | Lenovo Tab M9 IPS, 1340x800, 9" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 4% | 28% | 19% | 19% | |
Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 453 | 486 7% | 433 -4% | 499 10% | 405 -11% |
Brightness (cd/m²) | 438 | 462 5% | 393 -10% | 479 9% | 368 -16% |
Brightness Distribution (%) | 94 | 92 -2% | 85 -10% | 90 -4% | 83 -12% |
Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.31 | 0.35 -13% | 0.24 23% | 0.37 -19% | 0.17 45% |
Contrast (:1) | 1461 | 1389 -5% | 1804 23% | 1349 -8% | 2382 63% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.87 | 6.2 10% | 2.09 70% | 3.68 46% | 5.15 25% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.89 | 10.4 13% | 3.74 69% | 6.82 43% | 10.12 15% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.9 | 5.7 17% | 2.8 59% | 1.9 72% | 3.7 46% |
Gamma | 2.216 99% | 2.12 104% | 2.311 95% | 2.184 101% | 2.287 96% |
CCT | 8458 77% | 7911 82% | 6104 106% | 6787 96% | 7379 88% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8194 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
23.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.9 ms rise | |
↘ 10.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 52 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
33.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.7 ms rise | |
↘ 15.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (31.8 ms). |
性能 - 入门级高性能
联发科 联发科 Helio G99联发科 Helio G99 是这一价位的流行 SoC,尽管三星已将其用于两年前的Galaxy Tab A9,但与其他入门级平板电脑相比,它的性能仍然处于相对较高的水平。
不过,不要指望它会创造奇迹。卡顿和加载时间过长的现象很常见,部分原因是内存有限,最高只有 4 GB。
Antutu v10 - Total Score | |
Average of class Tablet (164396 - 2854581, n=71, last 2 years) | |
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (383511 - 422936, n=9) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 | |
Lenovo Tab |
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Average of class Tablet (2597 - 76843, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (6323 - 9695, n=13) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 | |
Lenovo Tab | |
Lenovo Tab M9 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches |
AImark - Score v3.x | |
Average of class Tablet (138 - 55794, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 | |
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (842 - 1001, n=10) | |
Lenovo Tab | |
Lenovo Tab M9 |
图形解决方案在图形性能方面的表现也一般。正如基准测试所显示的,在显示屏较低的原生分辨率下,你当然可以以相当流畅的帧速率玩游戏。但是,一旦游戏要求越来越高,帧率就会迅速下降。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 | |
Lenovo Tab M9 | |
Lenovo Tab | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 | |
Lenovo Tab | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches | |
Lenovo Tab M9 |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 | |
Lenovo Tab | |
Lenovo Tab M9 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 | |
Lenovo Tab M9 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches | |
Lenovo Tab |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 | |
Lenovo Tab | |
Lenovo Tab M9 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 | |
Lenovo Tab M9 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches | |
Lenovo Tab |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 | |
Lenovo Tab | |
Lenovo Tab M9 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 | |
Lenovo Tab M9 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches | |
Lenovo Tab |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 | |
Lenovo Tab | |
Lenovo Tab M9 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 | |
Lenovo Tab M9 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches | |
Lenovo Tab |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 | |
Lenovo Tab | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches | |
Lenovo Tab M9 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 | |
Lenovo Tab M9 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches | |
Lenovo Tab |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 | |
Lenovo Tab | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches | |
Lenovo Tab M9 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 | |
Lenovo Tab M9 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches | |
Lenovo Tab |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 | |
Lenovo Tab | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches | |
Lenovo Tab M9 |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 | |
Lenovo Tab M9 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches | |
Lenovo Tab |
在浏览互联网时,你可以期待相当不错的性能。即使是较大的网页,加载时间也不会太长。不过,在滚动时,您往往需要等待图片出现。
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score | |
Average of class Tablet (22.3 - 393, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 (Chrome 141) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212) | |
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (46.9 - 90.3, n=12) | |
Lenovo Tab (Chrome 133) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131) | |
Lenovo Tab M9 (Chrome 110) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0 | |
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 603, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 (Chrome 141) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212) | |
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (24.1 - 90.1, n=12) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131) | |
Lenovo Tab (Chrome 133) | |
Lenovo Tab M9 (Chome 110) |
Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0 | |
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 36.8, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 (Chrome 141) | |
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (3.66 - 6.27, n=5) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131) | |
Lenovo Tab (Chrome 133) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Average of class Tablet (26 - 315, n=75, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 (Chrome 141) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212) | |
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (39 - 89, n=13) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131) | |
Lenovo Tab (Chrome 133) | |
Lenovo Tab M9 (Chrome 110) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Tablet (763 - 111219, n=103, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 (Chrome 141) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212) | |
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (17228 - 26476, n=24) | |
Lenovo Tab (Chrome 133) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131) | |
Lenovo Tab M9 (Chrome 110) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Lenovo Tab M9 (Chrome 110) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131) | |
Lenovo Tab (Chrome 133) | |
Average of class Tablet (319 - 27101, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1600 - 2444, n=13) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 (Chrome 141) |
* ... smaller is better
Galaxy Tab A11 中的 UFS 2.2 存储对于入门级平板电脑来说是一个很好的功能,速度明显快于一些同类设备,尤其是在处理大文件时。
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 | Lenovo Tab | Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches | Lenovo Tab M9 | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 0% | -39% | -50% | -50% | -66% | 97% | |
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 925.1 | 916.45 -1% | 294 -68% | 289 -69% | 274.3 -70% | 277 ? -70% | 1562 ? 69% |
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 395.6 | 398.32 1% | 255.3 -35% | 263.6 -33% | 184.4 -53% | 178.4 ? -55% | 1154 ? 192% |
Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 179.5 | 182.74 2% | 119.5 -33% | 71.1 -60% | 95.2 -47% | 60.7 ? -66% | 228 ? 27% |
Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 129.9 | 128.92 -1% | 102 -21% | 82.7 -36% | 91 -30% | 33.8 ? -74% | 257 ? 98% |
游戏 - 游戏是可能的
三星Galaxy Tab A11 并不是一款专业的游戏机,但如果你降低一点期望值并选择最低细节,就能以相当流畅的 35-53 帧/秒体验《源氏冲击》等游戏。
即使在高细节和每秒 30 帧左右的情况下,《PUBG Mobile》的可玩性也相当不错。
我们使用GameBench软件进行测试。
排放物 - 底盘几乎不产生热量
温度
即使在长时间使用后,设备表面温度仍保持在极限范围内,设备正面最高温度达 33.1°C。
3DMark 压力测试也显示,在多次重复基准测试后,性能损失非常轻微。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
3DMark 压力测试
3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches | |
Lenovo Tab | |
Lenovo Tab M9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 |
发言人
两个扬声器分别位于平板电脑的左右两侧,水平握持Galaxy Tab A11 会产生轻微的立体声效果。
扬声器的音量并不大,在我们使用专用麦克风在 15 厘米距离内进行的测试中,最大音量约为 82.8 dB(A)。音质可能不会让你大吃一惊,但低音不足,甚至中低音也不是特别明显。
不过,在我们的测试中,扬声器的音量并没有过大,总的来说,考虑到音域有限,它们听起来还是相当平衡的。这使得聆听音乐或电影原声带变得非常容易。
如果你喜欢连接扬声器或耳机,你会发现平板电脑上有一个 3.5 毫米音频插孔和蓝牙。遗憾的是,用于无线声音传输的音频编解码器(SBC、AAC、aptX、SSC 和 LDAC)选择非常有限。甚至连 aptX HD 都没有搭载,因此可供选择的高清音频编解码器(如前面提到的 SSC、LDAC 和有限的 AAC)已经非常有限。
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Tab M9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池续航时间 - 并非耐力型选手
耗电量
虽然Galaxy Tab A11 在空闲时的耗电量略高于Galaxy Tab A9,但在负载较重的情况下,它的耗电量要低一些。我们猜测是最新的驱动程序和软件优化降低了功耗。
这款平板电脑的最大充电功率仍为 15 瓦。Tab A11 在欧洲发货时没有配备充电器,但使用我们现有的充电器时却非常顺畅。当电池完全耗尽时,我们能在大约 2 小时 30 分钟内为平板电脑充满电。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 5100 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 5100 mAh | Lenovo Tab 5100 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches 6650 mAh | Lenovo Tab M9 5100 mAh | Average Mediatek Helio G99 | Average of class Tablet | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -11% | 3% | 31% | 14% | -6% | -65% | |
Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 1.3 | 0.7 46% | 1.7 -31% | 0.9 31% | 1.6 -23% | 1.552 ? -19% | 1.998 ? -54% |
Idle Average * (Watt) | 2.1 | 2.94 -40% | 1.9 10% | 1.2 43% | 1.7 19% | 2.29 ? -9% | 3.78 ? -80% |
Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 2.8 | 3.03 -8% | 2.2 21% | 1.7 39% | 1.8 36% | 2.57 ? 8% | 4.13 ? -48% |
Load Average * (Watt) | 5.2 | 7.49 -44% | 4.6 12% | 3.5 33% | 2.8 46% | 5.44 ? -5% | 8.93 ? -72% |
Load Maximum * (Watt) | 7.5 | 8.02 -7% | 7.2 4% | 6.9 8% | 8.1 -8% | 7.81 ? -4% | 12.8 ? -71% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗:Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
功耗:GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
电池寿命
在电池续航时间方面,Galaxy Tab A11 虽然在功耗数据上略胜一筹,但与前代产品相比并无明显差异。在我们的 Wi-Fi 实际测试中,它的续航时间约为 14 小时 29 分钟--总的来说,多了几分钟。不过,在负载情况下,熄灯时间要早几分钟。
如果你看看其他平板电脑 小米红米 Pad SE 8.7Galaxy Tab A11 的电池容量为 5,100 毫安时,它的电池容量更大,这证明在这个价位的平板电脑中可以实现更多的功能,因此也可以期待更好的续航时间。
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 5100 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 5100 mAh | Lenovo Tab 5100 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches 6650 mAh | Lenovo Tab M9 5100 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery runtime | 1% | -16% | 20% | -5% | |
Reader / Idle (h) | 32.4 | 32.2 -1% | 32.5 0% | 37.3 15% | 35.5 10% |
H.264 (h) | 19.3 | 19.3 0% | 12.7 -34% | 21.1 9% | 16.5 -15% |
WiFi v1.3 (h) | 14.5 | 14.3 -1% | 11.8 -19% | 20.4 41% | 15.9 10% |
Load (h) | 4.4 | 4.6 5% | 4 -9% | 5 14% | 3.4 -23% |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
90 Hz 的屏幕是三星平价平板电脑的一大亮点。
除此以外,这款平板电脑缺乏创新,至少更新情况还不明朗。

Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
- 10/13/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 64 GB eMMC | Amazon: 1. $189.91 SAMSUNG Galaxy Tab A9+ 5G (1... 2. $109.48 Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (SM-X1... 3. $11.99 JETech Case for Samsung Gala... List Price: 179€ | 335 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 8.70" 1340x800 179 PPI IPS | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 64 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: $109.99 List Price: 179€ | 332 g | 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 8.70" 1340x800 179 PPI LCD TFT | |
Lenovo Tab Mediatek Helio G85 ⎘ ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 64 GB eMMC | Amazon: 1. $169.99 Lenovo Idea Tab - College Ta... 2. $185.00 Lenovo Tab M11, 11” Displa... 3. $119.99 Lenovo Tab One - Lightweight... List Price: 150€ | 424 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 10.10" 1920x1200 224 PPI IPS | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches Mediatek Helio G85 ⎘ ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 64 GB eMMC | Amazon: List Price: 150€ | 373 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 8.70" 1340x800 179 PPI IPS | |
Lenovo Tab M9 Mediatek Helio G80 ⎘ ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘ 3 GB Memory, 32 GB eMMC | Amazon: $109.00 List Price: 160€ | 344 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 9.00" 1340x800 173 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.