Notebookcheck Logo
三星Galaxy A11 评测

三星本可以在此次更新中投入更多精力 - 三星Galaxy Tab A11 平板电脑评测

否认进步?

与两年前的Galaxy Tab A9 相比,Galaxy Tab A11 的变化微乎其微:SoC、设计和有限的存储空间--一切都保持不变。摄像头和显示屏的小幅更新是否至少能给人留下深刻印象?
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android ARM Samsung Tablet

结论 - 三星Galaxy Tab A11

尚未开发的潜力。三星似乎不得不用 "三星Galaxy Tab A11 采用了Galaxy Tab A9 的设计 "这样委婉的说法来掩饰自己的乏善可陈。

尽管考虑到Galaxy Tab A11 的实惠价格区间,我们不能期望它创造奇迹,但其永恒设计的金属机身和相当窄的屏幕边框创造了一款好看的平板电脑--尽管设计没有变化。

与其他厂商的同类平板电脑相比,其性能也依然令人印象深刻。不过,您仍然需要忍受卡顿和冗长的加载时间。

电池容量较小,续航能力依然一般。不过,90 Hz 显示屏比前代产品有了明显提升,前置摄像头的自拍效果也略有改善。

更新情况值得商榷,但我们应该期待几年的支持。

虽然我们希望看到更多切实的改进,但Galaxy Tab A11 仍然是一款极具吸引力和实用性的入门级平板电脑,支持 GPS 跟踪和可选的 LTE。

Pros

+ 90 Hz 快速显示
+ 高速 UFS 2.2 存储
+ microSD 读卡器
+ 提供 LTE 版本
+ 金属机身
+ 价格合理
+ 表面温度低
+ 无 PWM 闪烁

Cons

- 与前代产品相比几乎没有任何新功能
- 更新承诺不明确
- 只有 4GB 内存
- ...我们的机型存储空间有限
- 像素密度低(179 ppi)
- 显示屏呈蓝色
- 摄像头一般
- 无指纹传感器
- 充电速度慢

价格和供应情况

截至发稿时,这款平板电脑尚未在三星在线商店上架。

该平板电脑不久也将在亚马逊上销售。

Amazon Logo
$189.91
SAMSUNG Galaxy Tab A9+ 5G (128GB, 8GB, Cellular) 11" 90Hz, Snapdragon, Android 13 Tablet (Fully Unlocked International Model for Global, Makes Calls T-Mobile Only) X216 (w/Fast Charger, Graphite)
  • $109.48
    Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (SM-X110), 64GB 4GB RAM, WiFi Only, Factory Unlocked GSM, International Version (15W Wall Charger Bundle) (Navy)
  • $11.99
    JETech Case for Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 / Tab A9 8.7-Inch 2025/2023, Slim Translucent Back Tri-Fold Folio Stand Protective Tablet Cover (Black)

廉价、便携一直是Galaxy Tab A 背后的理念,2025 年,这款平板电脑几乎没有什么变化。尽管事实上从未有过Galaxy Tab A10,这意味着其前身 Galaxy Tab A9已经有两年多的历史了。

不过,Tab A10 还是有一些微小的改进,我们的目标是了解这些改进对日常使用的影响。

规格

Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 (Galaxy Tab A Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G99 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
4 GB 
Display
8.70 inch 15:9, 1340 x 800 pixel 179 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 50 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio port, Card Reader: microSD, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.3
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 211 x 124.7
Battery
5100 mAh Lithium-Ion, 15 Watt charging
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, SIM tool, charging cable, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
335 g
Price
179 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳 - 金属,带塑料条

在其网站上,三星声称Galaxy Tab A11 "采用 "了其前代产品 Tab A9 的设计。 Galaxy Tab A9.另一种说法是,它只是重复使用了相同的机身,没有做任何改动:尺寸完全一样,外观也没有变化,但官方称 Tab A11 重了 3 克。虽然这在日常使用中并不会引起你的注意。

继续使用标志性设计并不一定是坏事。Galaxy Tab A11 与前代产品一样,采用了金属后壳。不过,为了更好地接收天线信号而采用的侧面粗塑料条可以做得更隐蔽一些,正面的屏占比也只有 81%,相当一般。

Galaxy Tab A11 拿在手里还算稳定,做工也不错。在试图扭动它时,可能会发出吱吱嘎嘎的声音,屏幕的液晶上也会看到适度的压力。

尺寸比较

235 mm 154 mm 9.5 mm 424 g215.4 mm 136.8 mm 8 mm 344 g211.6 mm 125.5 mm 8.8 mm 373 g211 mm 124.7 mm 8 mm 335 g211 mm 124.7 mm 8 mm 332 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g

特点 - 空间不大

Galaxy Tab A11 的有趣之处在于再次推出了 LTE 版本。令人不太满意的是,与两年前的Galaxy Tab A9 相比,有限的存储容量没有变化。以下是英国 WiFi 机型的确认售价:

  • Galaxy Tab A11 WiFi| 64 GB| 4 GB内存| 149英镑
  • Galaxy Tab A11 WiFi| 128 GB| 8 GB内存| 189英镑

我们评测的是配备 64 GB 存储空间和 Wi-Fi 的机型。

它还配备了一个 USB-C 端口,内部使用 USB 2.0 协议,允许的最大数据传输速率为 480 Mbps。这就避免了有线视频信号的传输。

左:SIM 卡插槽
左:SIM 卡插槽
右侧待机键、音量摇杆
右侧待机键、音量摇杆
首页: 扬声器
首页: 扬声器
底部:3.5 毫米音频端口、USB-C 端口、麦克风、扬声器
底部:3.5 毫米音频端口、USB-C 端口、麦克风、扬声器

microSD 读卡器

至少三星安装了 microSD 读卡器,允许用户在需要时扩展有限的存储空间。

实际上,读卡器传输数据的速度相对较快,这意味着我们可以放心地推荐它作为额外的存储选项。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
48.7 MB/s +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mediatek Helio G99 (Angelbird V60)
47.2 MB/s
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85 (Angelbird V60)
39.8 MB/s -16%
Average of class Tablet
  (10.2 - 57.4, n=60, last 2 years)
35.8 MB/s -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85 (Angelbird V60)
34.4 MB/s -27%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80 (Angelbird V60)
19.8 MB/s -58%

跨平台磁盘测试 (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø30.8 (10.9-41.7)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø38.8 (29.5-49.9)
Lenovo Tab Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.3 (29.9-45.4)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø36 (19.5-46.3)
Lenovo Tab M9 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø28.5 (14.1-42.8)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø55.5 (26.7-77.3)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø76.3 (41.4-80.6)
Lenovo Tab Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø74.2 (15.5-80.5)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø68.8 (13.6-78)
Lenovo Tab M9 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.6 (18.7-85.5)

软件 - 更新情况不明确

三星在其Galaxy Tab A11 上预装了Android 15,并覆盖了其专有的 OneUI 7.0 版用户界面。安全补丁可以追溯到 2025 年 8 月的这次评测,需要再次更新。据说这些补丁每季度发布一次。

关于承诺的更新时间,我们很难找到任何相关信息。实际上,三星已经走得很远,明确承诺许多机型的软件更新将持续数年。但是,我们在Galaxy Tab A11 的官方网站上却找不到这样的承诺。在这篇评论发表之前,我们就这一问题向三星公司提出的请求也没有得到答复。

时隔两年,前代产品至少更新到了Android 16,所以你也可以期待Galaxy Tab A11 至少再有两个操作系统版本。不过,由于三星严格限制其对价格相近的Galaxy A17 的更新承诺,Tab A11 可能会遭遇类似的命运。

三星Galaxy Tab A11 软件
三星Galaxy Tab A11 软件
三星Galaxy Tab A11 软件
三星Galaxy Tab A11 软件
三星Galaxy Tab A11 软件
三星Galaxy Tab A11 软件

可持续性

更新可用性的不确定性可能会妨碍延长使用时间。不过,三星的确披露Galaxy Tab A11 没有使用回收材料。不过,目前还没有进一步的可持续发展数据。

在三星的官方替换零件商店中,你可以找到前代产品的零件、可以找到前代产品的部件,这意味着Galaxy Tab A11 也应该很快就会出现在这里。

包装不使用塑料,非常平整,从而减少了运输过程中的二氧化碳排放量。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 还提供 LTE 型号

WiFi 5 是现有最快的 Wi-Fi 标准,在这个价位的产品中很常见。我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 参考路由器进行的测试速度还可以接受,不过偶尔会出现数据速率下降的情况。

此外,预计传输速度只有 200 Mbps 左右。接收速度约为 300 Mbps。这应该足以满足日常互联网使用的需要,但如果希望充分利用千兆互联网连接的优势,就必须另辟蹊径了。

此外,还提供通过蜂窝网络访问移动互联网的 WWAN 型号,但我们只收到了用于测试的 WiFi 型号。Galaxy Tab A11 仍然不支持现代 5G,即使是 WWAN 机型也最多只能支持 LTE。

Networking
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
197.4 (min: 104) MBit/s ∼36%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
327 (min: 274) MBit/s ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
372 (min: 189) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
368 (min: 359) MBit/s ∼61%
Lenovo Tab
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
289 (min: 237) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
371 (min: 342) MBit/s ∼61%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
246 (min: 171) MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
369 (min: 338) MBit/s ∼61%
Lenovo Tab M9
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
369 (min: 346) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
326 (min: 271) MBit/s ∼54%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
341 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼63%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
329 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼54%
Average of class Tablet
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
542 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
605 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼100%
050100150200250300Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø197.4 (104-218)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø327 (274-344)
GPS 室外测试
GPS 室外测试
可用的卫星网络
可用的卫星网络

在室外,平板电脑需要一段时间才能确定我们的位置,但最终跟踪精确到了 2 米以内。平板电脑还支持 SBAS,可实现更精确的跟踪。

此外,我们还进行了一次自行车骑行,以了解真实的生活场景。Galaxy Tab A11 出现了一些跟踪故障,例如,有一次它让我们穿过一个花园,却无法完全跟踪到转弯点。根据 Tab A11 的说法,我们在过桥时 "漂浮 "在水面上。

因此,Tab A11 在导航方面可能过于不准确。

三星Galaxy Tab A11 位置 - 概述
三星Galaxy Tab A11 位置 - 概述
三星Galaxy Tab A11 位置 - 转折点
三星Galaxy Tab A11 位置 - 转折点
三星Galaxy Tab A11 位置 - 桥接
三星Galaxy Tab A11 位置 - 桥接
Garmin Venu 2 位置 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2 位置 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2 的位置 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2 的位置 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2 的位置 - 桥梁
Garmin Venu 2 的位置 - 桥梁

摄像头 - 为前置摄像头增加几个像素

前置摄像头图像
前置摄像头图像

与前代产品相比,该机的摄像头甚至有了些许变化。前置的 500 万像素摄像头分辨率略高,用于自拍。乍看之下,图像相当不错,但不要期待太多细节,因为明亮区域很快就会曝光过度。

不过,800 万像素的主摄像头仍保持不变,拍出的照片颗粒感很强,只能显示一些细节。周围图像中的天空似乎也是白茫茫的一片,而手机则能显示出明显更多的细节。在弱光环境下,清晰度显得一般,但亮度至少可以接受。

视频最高可以 1080p 和 30fps 的速度录制,但自动对焦速度非常慢,录制的视频显示的细节也很少。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Front camera plantFront camera environmentFront camera low light

主摄像头还必须在实验室中证明自己的性能--一次是在全棚照明下,另一次是在仅有 1 勒克斯的条件下。

一旦光照度过低,图像就会变得模糊,即使是光线充足的照片,边缘也会很快变得模糊。红色背景下的文字也会很快失去对比度。

ColorChecker
8 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
10 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
9 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab A11: 8.94 ∆E min: 2.9 - max: 16.11 ∆E
ColorChecker
30 ∆E
55.5 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
46.1 ∆E
62.8 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
65.5 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
38.2 ∆E
77.1 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
94.8 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab A11: 47.5 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 94.84 ∆E

配件和保修 - 2 年放心保修

包装盒内没有充电器,但有一根 USB 数据线和一个 SIM 卡工具。

在德国,三星为其经济型平板电脑提供 2 年 保修

输入设备和操作 - 输入速度更快

Galaxy Tab A11 最明显的创新之一是它的操作。现在屏幕的最大刷新率为 90 Hz,这使得操作更加流畅。尽管采用了相同的 SoC,但这款平板电脑的响应速度往往比上一代产品要快得多。

但仍然不支持有源手写笔。

该设备没有使用生物识别数据解锁的指纹传感器。不过,可以通过前置摄像头进行面部识别,效果不错。

键盘景观
键盘景观
键盘肖像
键盘肖像

显示屏--大表面上的小像素

子像素排列
子像素排列

除了高达每秒 90 帧的刷新率外,显示屏与Galaxy Tab A9 相比没有变化。TFT 面板尺寸仍为 8.7 英寸,分辨率为 1,340 x 800 像素。像素密度较低,仅为 179 PPI,这意味着有时可以在有角度的边缘看到单个像素,一般来说,显示屏会显得比较模糊。

平均亮度为 438 cd/m²,虽然略低于前代产品,但也达到了这个价位的一般水平。

我们没有检测到任何 PWM 闪烁,这意味着即使对此类问题敏感的用户也能顺利使用这款平板电脑。

446
cd/m²
439
cd/m²
431
cd/m²
425
cd/m²
453
cd/m²
442
cd/m²
429
cd/m²
432
cd/m²
444
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 453 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 437.9 cd/m² Minimum: 4.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 453 cd/m²
Contrast: 1461:1 (Black: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 6.87 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.8}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 6.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
78.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.216
CCT: 8458 K
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
IPS, 1340x800, 8.7"
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
LCD TFT, 1340x800, 8.7"
Lenovo Tab
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
IPS, 1340x800, 8.7"
Lenovo Tab M9
IPS, 1340x800, 9"
Screen
4%
28%
19%
19%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
453
486
7%
433
-4%
499
10%
405
-11%
Brightness (cd/m²)
438
462
5%
393
-10%
479
9%
368
-16%
Brightness Distribution (%)
94
92
-2%
85
-10%
90
-4%
83
-12%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
0.31
0.35
-13%
0.24
23%
0.37
-19%
0.17
45%
Contrast (:1)
1461
1389
-5%
1804
23%
1349
-8%
2382
63%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.87
6.2
10%
2.09
70%
3.68
46%
5.15
25%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
11.89
10.4
13%
3.74
69%
6.82
43%
10.12
15%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.9
5.7
17%
2.8
59%
1.9
72%
3.7
46%
Gamma
2.216 99%
2.12 104%
2.311 95%
2.184 101%
2.287 96%
CCT
8458 77%
7911 82%
6104 106%
6787 96%
7379 88%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8194 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

我们使用分光光度计和 CalMAN 软件进行测量后发现,显示屏上有明显的蓝色色调。遗憾的是,除了蓝色滤光片外,我们无法改变显示屏的色彩设置,而蓝色滤光片并不能提高色彩准确度。

Galaxy Tab A11 的色彩普遍偏冷,因此对色彩表现准确度要求较高的用户可能不会满意。

卡尔曼灰阶
卡尔曼灰阶
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3 色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3 色彩空间

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
23.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.9 ms rise
↘ 10.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 52 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
33.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.7 ms rise
↘ 15.1 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (31.8 ms).

在室外,该平板电脑在阴天时还比较容易阅读。不过,一旦太阳透过云层,显示屏上就会出现明显的反光,使内容几乎看不清。

TFT 显示屏的可视角度相当不错,不过在相对较宽的可视角度下会略显暗淡。

室外使用
室外使用
视角
视角

性能 - 入门级高性能

联发科 联发科 Helio G99联发科 Helio G99 是这一价位的流行 SoC,尽管三星已将其用于两年前的Galaxy Tab A9,但与其他入门级平板电脑相比,它的性能仍然处于相对较高的水平。

不过,不要指望它会创造奇迹。卡顿和加载时间过长的现象很常见,部分原因是内存有限,最高只有 4 GB。

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=100, last 2 years)
1373 Points +85%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
742 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
738 Points -1%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (704 - 742, n=18)
725 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
403 Points -46%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
402 Points -46%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (848 - 14690, n=100, last 2 years)
4370 Points +109%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2088 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2065 Points -1%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1784 - 2088, n=18)
1962 Points -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1449 Points -31%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1396 Points -33%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet
  (164396 - 2854581, n=71, last 2 years)
1080007 Points +181%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (383511 - 422936, n=9)
403419 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
384002 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
383511 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
278813 Points -27%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 27428, n=86, last 2 years)
11901 Points +31%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (8885 - 11379, n=24)
9848 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
9102 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
9083 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7985 Points -12%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7622 Points -16%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
6709 Points -26%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet
  (227 - 2155, n=59, last 2 years)
924 Points +58%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
586 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
573 Points -2%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (526 - 602, n=13)
568 Points -3%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
394 Points -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
386 Points -34%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
348 Points -41%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet
  (195 - 13159, n=66, last 2 years)
5528 Points +76%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3142 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3120 Points -1%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (2855 - 3240, n=14)
3028 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2270 Points -28%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2087 Points -34%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2072 Points -34%
System
Average of class Tablet
  (904 - 18343, n=66, last 2 years)
8759 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
6782 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
6776 Points 0%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (5261 - 6782, n=14)
6237 Points -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4932 Points -27%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4213 Points -38%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
4045 Points -40%
Memory
Average of class Tablet
  (401 - 17963, n=66, last 2 years)
6562 Points +56%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
4201 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
4152 Points -1%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (3454 - 5140, n=14)
3852 Points -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2662 Points -37%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2343 Points -44%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2253 Points -46%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet
  (88 - 57192, n=66, last 2 years)
14259 Points +430%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (2683 - 3002, n=14)
2799 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2692 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2683 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1818 Points -32%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1810 Points -33%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1780 Points -34%
Web
Average of class Tablet
  (10 - 2370, n=66, last 2 years)
1471 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1288 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1273 Points -1%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1150 - 1325, n=14)
1259 Points -2%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1122 Points -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1118 Points -13%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1069 Points -17%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet
  (2597 - 76843, n=67, last 2 years)
15115 Points +133%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (6323 - 9695, n=13)
8445 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
6479 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
6453 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4472 Points -31%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
3992 Points -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3899 Points -40%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet
  (138 - 55794, n=58, last 2 years)
4760 Points +376%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1001 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
982 Points -2%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (842 - 1001, n=10)
911 Points -9%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
737 Points -26%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
311 Points -69%

图形解决方案在图形性能方面的表现也一般。正如基准测试所显示的,在显示屏较低的原生分辨率下,你当然可以以相当流畅的帧速率玩游戏。但是,一旦游戏要求越来越高,帧率就会迅速下降。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB eMMC Flash
358 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
345 Points -4%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
180 Points -50%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
180 Points -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
178 Points -50%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
330 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB eMMC Flash
322 Points
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
182 Points -43%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
180 Points -44%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
177 Points -45%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1235 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1225 Points -1%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
710 Points -43%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
705 Points -43%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
694 Points -44%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB eMMC Flash
60 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
59 fps -2%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52 fps -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
51 fps -15%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps -32%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
63 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB eMMC Flash
62 fps
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
42 fps -32%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps -34%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
40 fps -35%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
58 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB eMMC Flash
57 fps
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
42 fps -26%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
39 fps -32%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
24 fps -58%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps +54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB eMMC Flash
26 fps
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
24 fps -8%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
23 fps -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
22 fps -15%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
50 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB eMMC Flash
50 fps
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
29 fps -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
28 fps -44%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps -70%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB eMMC Flash
24 fps
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps -37%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps -42%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
27 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB eMMC Flash
26 fps
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps -46%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.9 fps -66%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9.3 fps -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.9 fps -41%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8.6 fps -43%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB eMMC Flash
17 fps
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8.1 fps -52%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.1 fps -52%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5.3 fps -69%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5.7 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.6 fps -2%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3.3 fps -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3.2 fps -44%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3.1 fps -46%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB eMMC Flash
25 fps
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
12 fps -52%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps -56%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.4 fps -66%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB eMMC Flash
13.8 fps
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.6 fps -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.5 fps -38%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8.2 fps -41%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2.5 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.4 fps -4%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1.4 fps -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1.4 fps -44%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1.4 fps -44%

在浏览互联网时,你可以期待相当不错的性能。即使是较大的网页,加载时间也不会太长。不过,在滚动时,您往往需要等待图片出现。

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Average of class Tablet (22.3 - 393, n=69, last 2 years)
140.9 Points +59%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 (Chrome 141)
88.878 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212)
71.728 Points -19%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (46.9 - 90.3, n=12)
71.3 Points -20%
Lenovo Tab (Chrome 133)
61.274 Points -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131)
51.638 Points -42%
Lenovo Tab M9 (Chrome 110)
38.697 Points -56%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 603, n=60, last 2 years)
172.1 runs/min +94%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 (Chrome 141)
88.6 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212)
61.2 runs/min -31%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (24.1 - 90.1, n=12)
60.9 runs/min -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131)
48.6 runs/min -45%
Lenovo Tab (Chrome 133)
46.7 runs/min -47%
Lenovo Tab M9 (Chome 110)
30 runs/min -66%
Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 36.8, n=59, last 2 years)
13.7 runs/min +123%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 (Chrome 141)
6.14 runs/min
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (3.66 - 6.27, n=5)
5.11 runs/min -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131)
3.11 runs/min -49%
Lenovo Tab (Chrome 133)
3.01 runs/min -51%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (26 - 315, n=75, last 2 years)
129.1 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 (Chrome 141)
87 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212)
81 Points -7%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (39 - 89, n=13)
74.2 Points -15%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131)
59 Points -32%
Lenovo Tab (Chrome 133)
58 Points -33%
Lenovo Tab M9 (Chrome 110)
45 Points -48%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (763 - 111219, n=103, last 2 years)
39055 Points +54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 (Chrome 141)
25416 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212)
22187 Points -13%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (17228 - 26476, n=24)
22118 Points -13%
Lenovo Tab (Chrome 133)
15443 Points -39%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131)
13605 Points -46%
Lenovo Tab M9 (Chrome 110)
12163 Points -52%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Lenovo Tab M9 (Chrome 110)
3467.2 ms * -117%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131)
2742 ms * -71%
Lenovo Tab (Chrome 133)
2711.6 ms * -69%
Average of class Tablet (319 - 27101, n=84, last 2 years)
2696 ms * -69%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1600 - 2444, n=13)
1973 ms * -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212)
1922.1 ms * -20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 (Chrome 141)
1600 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Galaxy Tab A11 中的 UFS 2.2 存储对于入门级平板电脑来说是一个很好的功能,速度明显快于一些同类设备,尤其是在处理大文件时。

Samsung Galaxy Tab A11Samsung Galaxy Tab A9Lenovo TabXiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inchesLenovo Tab M9Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
0%
-39%
-50%
-50%
-66%
97%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)
925.1
916.45
-1%
294
-68%
289
-69%
274.3
-70%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)
395.6
398.32
1%
255.3
-35%
263.6
-33%
184.4
-53%
178.4 ?(40 - 396, n=209)
-55%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)
179.5
182.74
2%
119.5
-33%
71.1
-60%
95.2
-47%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)
129.9
128.92
-1%
102
-21%
82.7
-36%
91
-30%

游戏 - 游戏是可能的

三星Galaxy Tab A11 并不是一款专业的游戏机,但如果你降低一点期望值并选择最低细节,就能以相当流畅的 35-53 帧/秒体验《源氏冲击》等游戏。

即使在高细节和每秒 30 帧左右的情况下,《PUBG Mobile》的可玩性也相当不错。

我们使用GameBench软件进行测试。

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
05101520253035404550Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø43 (35-53)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø24.4 (12-33)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø39.2 (36-41)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø29.5 (27-31)

排放物 - 底盘几乎不产生热量

温度

即使在长时间使用后,设备表面温度仍保持在极限范围内,设备正面最高温度达 33.1°C。

3DMark 压力测试也显示,在多次重复基准测试后,性能损失非常轻微。

Max. Load
 30.2 °C28.7 °C26.7 °C 
 33.1 °C28.6 °C26.7 °C 
 31.2 °C29.8 °C26.6 °C 
Maximum: 33.1 °C
Average: 29.1 °C
27.6 °C27.9 °C30.4 °C
27.1 °C28.3 °C32.1 °C
27 °C27.1 °C30.7 °C
Maximum: 32.1 °C
Average: 28.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  39.9 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
99 % +2%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
98.8 % +2%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
98.3 % +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB eMMC Flash
97.3 %
正面热图
正面热图
后方热图
后方热图

发言人

两个扬声器分别位于平板电脑的左右两侧,水平握持Galaxy Tab A11 会产生轻微的立体声效果。

扬声器的音量并不大,在我们使用专用麦克风在 15 厘米距离内进行的测试中,最大音量约为 82.8 dB(A)。音质可能不会让你大吃一惊,但低音不足,甚至中低音也不是特别明显。

不过,在我们的测试中,扬声器的音量并没有过大,总的来说,考虑到音域有限,它们听起来还是相当平衡的。这使得聆听音乐或电影原声带变得非常容易。

如果你喜欢连接扬声器或耳机,你会发现平板电脑上有一个 3.5 毫米音频插孔和蓝牙。遗憾的是,用于无线声音传输的音频编解码器(SBC、AAC、aptX、SSC 和 LDAC)选择非常有限。甚至连 aptX HD 都没有搭载,因此可供选择的高清音频编解码器(如前面提到的 SSC、LDAC 和有限的 AAC)已经非常有限。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.141.12533.539.73132.537.5403234.95032.839.36325.729.98016.721.81001724.212518.129.316017.736.520018.342.125017.747.231517.752.54001653.350017.357.563024.863.380023.665.7100018.874.2125017.475.4160018.273.3200016.573.2250014.272.8315015.871.9400018.364.3500020.861.5630019.467.8800019.265.81000020.259.7125002256.2160001952.4SPL31.482.8N1.549.7median 18.2median 61.5Delta1.29.339.244.134.442.430.832.733.431.33438.629.830.228.919.519.22321.332.218.240.913.845.21452.313.354.3115510.95910.363.515.865.816.166.317.36811.469.911.268.411.571.41269.912.966.713.56614.166.71568.815.864.216.554.117.346.126.179.80.745.6median 14median 64.22.59hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Tab A11Lenovo Tab M9
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Tab M9 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - 并非耐力型选手

耗电量

虽然Galaxy Tab A11 在空闲时的耗电量略高于Galaxy Tab A9,但在负载较重的情况下,它的耗电量要低一些。我们猜测是最新的驱动程序和软件优化降低了功耗。

这款平板电脑的最大充电功率仍为 15 瓦。Tab A11 在欧洲发货时没有配备充电器,但使用我们现有的充电器时却非常顺畅。当电池完全耗尽时,我们能在大约 2 小时 30 分钟内为平板电脑充满电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.3 / 2.1 / 2.8 Watt
Load midlight 5.2 / 7.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
5100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
5100 mAh
Lenovo Tab
5100 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
6650 mAh
Lenovo Tab M9
5100 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio G99
 
Average of class Tablet
 
Power Consumption
-11%
3%
31%
14%
-6%
-65%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)
1.3
0.7
46%
1.7
-31%
0.9
31%
1.6
-23%
1.552 ?(0.7 - 5.6, n=13)
-19%
Idle Average * (Watt)
2.1
2.94
-40%
1.9
10%
1.2
43%
1.7
19%
2.29 ?(1.1 - 6.1, n=13)
-9%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)
2.8
3.03
-8%
2.2
21%
1.7
39%
1.8
36%
Load Average * (Watt)
5.2
7.49
-44%
4.6
12%
3.5
33%
2.8
46%
5.44 ?(2.9 - 10, n=13)
-5%
Load Maximum * (Watt)
7.5
8.02
-7%
7.2
4%
6.9
8%
8.1
-8%

* ... smaller is better

功耗:Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.89 (3.25-7.01)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.703 (1.27-2.12)

功耗:GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.50.70.91.11.41.61.82.12.32.52.733.23.43.63.94.14.3Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.39 (4.2-4.56)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.703 (1.27-2.12)

电池寿命

在电池续航时间方面,Galaxy Tab A11 虽然在功耗数据上略胜一筹,但与前代产品相比并无明显差异。在我们的 Wi-Fi 实际测试中,它的续航时间约为 14 小时 29 分钟--总的来说,多了几分钟。不过,在负载情况下,熄灯时间要早几分钟。

如果你看看其他平板电脑 小米红米 Pad SE 8.7Galaxy Tab A11 的电池容量为 5,100 毫安时,它的电池容量更大,这证明在这个价位的平板电脑中可以实现更多的功能,因此也可以期待更好的续航时间。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
32h 25min
WiFi Websurfing
14h 29min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
19h 18min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 21min
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
5100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
5100 mAh
Lenovo Tab
5100 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
6650 mAh
Lenovo Tab M9
5100 mAh
Battery runtime
1%
-16%
20%
-5%
Reader / Idle (h)
32.4
32.2
-1%
32.5
0%
37.3
15%
35.5
10%
H.264 (h)
19.3
19.3
0%
12.7
-34%
21.1
9%
16.5
-15%
WiFi v1.3 (h)
14.5
14.3
-1%
11.8
-19%
20.4
41%
15.9
10%
Load (h)
4.4
4.6
5%
4
-9%
5
14%
3.4
-23%

Notebookcheck 总体评分

90 Hz 的屏幕是三星平价平板电脑的一大亮点。

除此以外,这款平板电脑缺乏创新,至少更新情况还不明朗。

三星Galaxy A11 评测
三星Galaxy A11 评测

Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 - 10/13/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
79 / 98 → 81%
Keyboard
69 / 80 → 86%
Pointing Device
84%
Connectivity
36 / 69 → 52%
Weight
86 / 40-88 → 95%
Battery
90%
Display
75%
Games Performance
5 / 65 → 8%
Application Performance
54 / 92 → 58%
AI Performance
5%
Temperature
95%
Noise
100%
Audio
68 / 91 → 75%
Camera
44 / 90 → 49%
Average
58%
76%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
85%
Power Use
95.3%
Repairability
51%
Software Updates
45%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 46.1%

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
76.4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘
4 GB Memory, 64 GB eMMC
Amazon:
1. $189.91
SAMSUNG Galaxy Tab A9+ 5G (1...
2. $109.48
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (SM-X1...
3. $11.99
JETech Case for Samsung Gala...
List Price: 179€
335 g64 GB eMMC Flash8.70"
1340x800
179 PPI
IPS
2.
84.1% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘
4 GB Memory, 64 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon: $109.99
List Price: 179€
332 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash8.70"
1340x800
179 PPI
LCD TFT
3.
77.3%
Lenovo Tab
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85 ⎘
ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘
4 GB Memory, 64 GB eMMC
Amazon:
1. $169.99
Lenovo Idea Tab - College Ta...
2. $185.00
Lenovo Tab M11, 11” Displa...
3. $119.99
Lenovo Tab One - Lightweight...
List Price: 150€
424 g64 GB eMMC Flash10.10"
1920x1200
224 PPI
IPS
4.
76.8%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85 ⎘
ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘
4 GB Memory, 64 GB eMMC
Amazon:
List Price: 150€
373 g64 GB eMMC Flash8.70"
1340x800
179 PPI
IPS
5.
82.2% v7 (old)
Lenovo Tab M9
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80 ⎘
ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘
3 GB Memory, 32 GB eMMC
Amazon: $109.00
List Price: 160€
344 g32 GB eMMC Flash9.00"
1340x800
173 PPI
IPS

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 三星本可以在此次更新中投入更多精力 - 三星Galaxy Tab A11 平板电脑评测
Florian Schmitt, 2025-10-15 (Update: 2025-10-15)