Notebookcheck Logo

Lenovo Tab M7平板电脑评测:装了安卓Go的Kindle杀手

非常廉价。 凭借第二代Tab M7,联想将价格非常低廉的平板电脑推向市场,尽管其硬件性能较差,但仍能获得很好的表现。 多亏了Android Go,没有不必要的软件,而且仅售79欧元(约合88美元),即可提供您期望从此类设备获得的几乎所有功能。
Android Tablet Touchscreen
Lenovo Tab M7 (Tab M Series)
Processor
Mediatek MT8321 4 x 1.3 GHz, Cortex-A7
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-400 MP2
Memory
1024 MB 
Display
7.00 inch 16:10, 1024 x 600 pixel 170 PPI, capacitive, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 12 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机/麦克风组合插孔, Card Reader: microSD (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), Sensors: 运动传感器
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.2 x 176 x 103
Battery
3500 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 1, Keyboard: 屏幕键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, USB charger, MicroUSB cable, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
236 g, Power Supply: 57 g
Price
79 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
75.4 %
02/2020
Lenovo Tab M7
MT8321, Mali-400 MP2
236 g8.2 mm7.00"1024x600
77.7 %
07/2019
Amazon Fire 7 2019
MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, Mali-T720 MP2
286 g9.6 mm7.00"1024x600
78.7 %
Alldocube M8 T801
MT6797X, Mali-T880 MP4
345 g8.48 mm8.00"1920x1200
83.3 %
04/2018
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
Kirin 960, Mali-G71 MP8
316 g7.3 mm8.40"2560x1600
79.6 %
09/2019
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
SD 429, Adreno 504
345 g8 mm8.00"1280x800

Size Comparison

215 mm 122.9 mm 8.48 mm 345 g212.6 mm 124.8 mm 7.3 mm 316 g210 mm 124.4 mm 8 mm 345 g192 mm 115 mm 9.6 mm 286 g176 mm 103 mm 8.2 mm 236 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 32 GB eMMC Flash
205 MBit/s +325%
Alldocube M8 T801
Mali-T880 MP4, MT6797X, 32 GB eMMC Flash
195 MBit/s +305%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
Adreno 504, SD 429, 32 GB eMMC Flash
115 (109min - 121max) MBit/s +139%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 16 GB eMMC Flash
91 (44min - 103max) MBit/s +89%
Lenovo Tab M7
Mali-400 MP2, MT8321, 16 GB eMMC Flash
48.2 (34min - 61max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Alldocube M8 T801
Mali-T880 MP4, MT6797X, 32 GB eMMC Flash
235 MBit/s +294%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 32 GB eMMC Flash
203 MBit/s +240%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
Adreno 504, SD 429, 32 GB eMMC Flash
101 (86min - 107max) MBit/s +69%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 16 GB eMMC Flash
97 (20min - 109max) MBit/s +62%
Lenovo Tab M7
Mali-400 MP2, MT8321, 16 GB eMMC Flash
59.7 (41min - 56max) MBit/s
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Lenovo Tab M7; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø53 (41-56)
Lenovo Tab M7; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø48.1 (34-61)
GNSS - Lenovo Tab M7
GNSS - Lenovo Tab M7
GNSS - Lenovo Tab M7
GNSS - Lenovo Tab M7
GNSS - Lenovo Tab M7
GNSS - Lenovo Tab M7
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker
4.2 ∆E
4 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
6 ∆E
3 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
4 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo Tab M7: 5.29 ∆E min: 1.35 - max: 10.3 ∆E
ColorChecker
30 ∆E
55.5 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
46.1 ∆E
62.8 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
65.5 ∆E
64.5 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
38.2 ∆E
77.1 ∆E
45 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
94.8 ∆E
71.7 ∆E
52.9 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo Tab M7: 47.61 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 94.84 ∆E
Lenovo Tab M7 - Test chart
Lenovo Tab M7 - Test chart (detail)
Lenovo Tab M7 - Test chart (1 Lux)
490
cd/m²
448
cd/m²
429
cd/m²
478
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
419
cd/m²
480
cd/m²
429
cd/m²
424
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 490 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 449.3 cd/m² Minimum: 4.52 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 447 cd/m²
Contrast: 1788:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.99
ΔE Greyscale 8.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.2
68.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.07
Lenovo Tab M7
IPS, 1024x600, 7.00
Amazon Fire 7 2019
IPS, 1024x600, 7.00
Alldocube M8 T801
IPS, 1920x1200, 8.00
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
IPS, 2560x1600, 8.40
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
TFT, 1280x800, 8.00
Screen
11%
-17%
-21%
1%
Brightness middle
447
391
-13%
317.5
-29%
405
-9%
377
-16%
Brightness
449
385
-14%
320
-29%
392
-13%
372
-17%
Brightness Distribution
86
75
-13%
94
9%
92
7%
87
1%
Black Level *
0.25
0.15
40%
0.5
-100%
0.67
-168%
0.29
-16%
Contrast
1788
2607
46%
635
-64%
604
-66%
1300
-27%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
7.1
6.3
11%
6.12
14%
5.78
19%
6.1
14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
20.6
19.3
6%
13.72
33%
9.82
52%
10.9
47%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
8.1
6.1
25%
5.8
28%
7.2
11%
6.6
19%
Gamma
2.07 106%
2.22 99%
2.12 104%
2.278 97%
2.13 103%
CCT
8255 79%
8069 81%
7633 85%
8405 77%
7861 83%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17717 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
34.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.6 ms rise
↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
50.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 29.2 ms rise
↘ 21.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.6 ms).
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (745 - 5713, n=15, last 2 years)
2963 Points +587%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
1896 Points +340%
Alldocube M8 T801
1352 Points +214%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
648 Points +50%
Lenovo Tab M7
431 Points
Average Mediatek MT8321 (429 - 431, n=2)
430 Points 0%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (1418 - 15310, n=15, last 2 years)
8506 Points +655%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
6509 Points +478%
Alldocube M8 T801
3590 Points +219%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
1797 Points +59%
Lenovo Tab M7
1127 Points
Average Mediatek MT8321 (1106 - 1127, n=2)
1117 Points -1%
Compute RenderScript Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
11539 Points +1274%
Average of class Tablet (2128 - 10799, n=10, last 2 years)
7004 Points +734%
Alldocube M8 T801
2843 Points +238%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
1077 Points +28%
Average Mediatek MT8321 (840 - 862, n=2)
851 Points +1%
Lenovo Tab M7
840 Points
PCMark for Android
Work performance score
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
7053 Points +159%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
5986 Points +120%
Alldocube M8 T801
5984 Points +120%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
4685 Points +72%
Lenovo Tab M7
2719 Points
Average Mediatek MT8321 (2529 - 2719, n=2)
2624 Points -3%
Work 2.0 performance score
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
6006 Points
Alldocube M8 T801
4695 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
4267 Points
Amazon Fire 7 2019
3361 Points
Lenovo Tab M7
0 Points
Average Mediatek MT8321 ()
0 Points
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Alldocube M8 T801
12895 Points +344%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
7879 Points +172%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
6194 Points +113%
Average Mediatek MT8321 (2902 - 2913, n=2)
2908 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab M7
2902 Points
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Alldocube M8 T801
14192 Points +475%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
6897 Points +179%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
5562 Points +125%
Lenovo Tab M7
2468 Points
Average Mediatek MT8321 (2468 - 2468, n=2)
2468 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
15709 Points +108%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
10290 Points +36%
Alldocube M8 T801
9771 Points +29%
Average Mediatek MT8321 (7561 - 7924, n=2)
7743 Points +2%
Lenovo Tab M7
7561 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (14 - 144, n=66, last 2 years)
62.4 fps +537%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
51 fps +420%
Alldocube M8 T801
35 fps +257%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
22 fps +124%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
17 fps +73%
Lenovo Tab M7
9.8 fps
Average Mediatek MT8321 (4.4 - 9.8, n=2)
7.1 fps -28%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (15 - 873, n=66, last 2 years)
164.9 fps +3648%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
78 fps +1673%
Alldocube M8 T801
39 fps +786%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
11 fps +150%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
10 fps +127%
Average Mediatek MT8321 (4.4 - 7.8, n=2)
6.1 fps +39%
Lenovo Tab M7
4.4 fps
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
181614 Points +726%
Alldocube M8 T801
105872 Points +382%
Lenovo Tab M7
21974 Points
Average Mediatek MT8321 (20856 - 21974, n=2)
21415 Points -3%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
Points -100%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet (444 - 8886, n=56, last 2 years)
3675 Points +2241%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
2982 Points +1799%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
987 Points +529%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
681 Points +334%
Lenovo Tab M7
157 Points
Average Mediatek MT8321 (150 - 157, n=2)
153.5 Points -2%
System
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 14097, n=56, last 2 years)
6630 Points +601%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
3940 Points +316%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1945 Points +106%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
1225 Points +29%
Lenovo Tab M7
946 Points
Average Mediatek MT8321 (945 - 946, n=2)
946 Points 0%
Memory
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10049, n=56, last 2 years)
4349 Points +837%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
3985 Points +759%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
1258 Points +171%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
745 Points +61%
Lenovo Tab M7
464 Points
Average Mediatek MT8321 (397 - 464, n=2)
431 Points -7%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (580 - 31738, n=56, last 2 years)
6722 Points +4601%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
4143 Points +2797%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
487 Points +241%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
338 Points +136%
Lenovo Tab M7
143 Points
Average Mediatek MT8321 (142 - 143, n=2)
142.5 Points 0%
Web
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
1215 Points +12050%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 1907, n=56, last 2 years)
1215 Points +12050%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
809 Points +7990%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
698 Points +6880%
Lenovo Tab M7
10 Points
Average Mediatek MT8321 (10 - 10, n=2)
10 Points 0%

Legend

 
Lenovo Tab M7 Mediatek MT8321, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire 7 2019 MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Alldocube M8 T801 MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429, Qualcomm Adreno 504, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (64.6 - 135.7, n=4, last 2 years)
92.4 Points +725%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 (Chrome 66)
56.8 Points +407%
Alldocube M8 T801 (Chrome 72.0.3626.105)
30.35 Points +171%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
25.07 Points +124%
Amazon Fire 7 2019 (Silk Browser 70.3.1)
16.22 Points +45%
Lenovo Tab M7 (Chrome 79)
11.2 Points
Average Mediatek MT8321 (10.9 - 11.2, n=2)
11.1 Points -1%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (34 - 430, n=48, last 2 years)
134.4 Points +934%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 (Chrome 66)
72 Points +454%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
32 Points +146%
Amazon Fire 7 2019
23 Points +77%
Lenovo Tab M7 (Chrome 79)
13 Points
Average Mediatek MT8321 ()
13 Points 0%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (48 - 572, n=60, last 2 years)
101 runs/min +1678%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
13.5 runs/min +138%
Amazon Fire 7 2019 (Silk Browser 70.3.1)
11.11 runs/min +96%
Lenovo Tab M7 (Chrome 79)
5.68 runs/min
Average Mediatek MT8321 ()
5.68 runs/min 0%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (2672 - 105178, n=81, last 2 years)
25897 Points +1413%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 (Chrome 66)
11338 Points +562%
Alldocube M8 T801 (Chrome 72.0.3626.105)
5909 Points +245%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
4297 Points +151%
Amazon Fire 7 2019 (Silk Browser 70.3.1)
2871 Points +68%
Average Mediatek MT8321 (1712 - 1718, n=2)
1715 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab M7 (Chrome 79)
1712 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Lenovo Tab M7 (Chrome 79)
19212 ms *
Average Mediatek MT8321 (19085 - 19212, n=2)
19149 ms * -0%
Amazon Fire 7 2019 (Silk Browser 70.3.1)
13853 ms * +28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79)
10655 ms * +45%
Alldocube M8 T801 (Chrome 72.0.3626.105)
7429 ms * +61%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 (Chrome 66)
3734 ms * +81%
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=67, last 2 years)
3160 ms * +84%

* ... smaller is better

Lenovo Tab M7Amazon Fire 7 2019Alldocube M8 T801Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290Average 16 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
4%
8%
164%
90%
-2%
776%
Sequential Read 256KB
155.7
164.9
6%
142.8
-8%
268.6
73%
291.9
87%
Sequential Write 256KB
53.1
77.3
46%
103
94%
132.2
149%
108.5
104%
Random Read 4KB
31.39
24.98
-20%
19.5
-38%
62.8
100%
57.8
84%
Random Write 4KB
11.96
5.83
-51%
10.01
-16%
65.1
444%
16.89
41%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
38.97 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
59.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
52%
84.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
118%
87.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
124%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
35.21 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
32.05 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
70.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
101%
69.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
99%
Max. Load
 27.5 °C27.8 °C30.9 °C 
 27.7 °C25.9 °C31.2 °C 
 26.8 °C27.3 °C28.9 °C 
Maximum: 31.2 °C
Average: 28.2 °C
26.1 °C26.2 °C27.5 °C
26.2 °C26.2 °C27.5 °C
26.3 °C26.6 °C27.4 °C
Maximum: 27.5 °C
Average: 26.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  29 °C | Room Temperature 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 27.5 °C / 82 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Heat distribution - front
Heat distribution - front
Heat distribution - back
Heat distribution - back
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.831.32525.226.93121.624.84024.724.85029.630.76322.521.58025.118.810020.120.512519.926.416020.83420017.636.225017.640.531517.446.540016.151.650013.956.963014.56180016.168.3100014.574.9125014.478160013.673.4200013.975.1250014.573.8315014.474.2400014.873.9500014.775.7630014.876.7800014.972.21000015.170.1125001568.41600015.154.5SPL26.986.1N0.962.8median 14.9median 68.4Delta1.613.242.239.931.233.627.227.523.725.83132.722.72222.821.824.423.820.923.520.327.919.134.916.440.41646.317.651.315.258.314.663.915.470.114.873.115.272.615.669.114.869.114.667.814.370.214.670.214.772.115.369.515.36914.968.615.36615.654.927.381.90.950.6median 15.3median 67.81.211.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Tab M7Amazon Fire 7 2019
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo Tab M7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Amazon Fire 7 2019 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.16 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.85 / 2.4 / 2.42 Watt
Load midlight 3.17 / 3.69 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Lenovo Tab M7
3500 mAh
Amazon Fire 7 2019
2980 mAh
Alldocube M8 T801
5500 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
5100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
5100 mAh
Power Consumption
-31%
-167%
-106%
-4%
Idle Minimum *
0.85
1.1
-29%
3.4
-300%
2.1
-147%
0.62
27%
Idle Average *
2.4
2.77
-15%
5.1
-113%
3.74
-56%
2.68
-12%
Idle Maximum *
2.42
2.79
-15%
5.3
-119%
4.33
-79%
2.7
-12%
Load Average *
3.17
4.5
-42%
6
-89%
6.32
-99%
3.61
-14%
Load Maximum *
3.69
5.61
-52%
11.5
-212%
9.13
-147%
4
-8%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
6h 42min
Lenovo Tab M7
3500 mAh
Amazon Fire 7 2019
2980 mAh
Alldocube M8 T801
5500 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
5100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290
5100 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
402
462
15%
420
4%
627
56%
831
107%

Pros

+ 低价
+ 刚性机身
+ 窄边框
+ 原生Android 9 Go

Cons

- 慢速Wi-Fi(802.11b / g / n)
- 没有USB C端口
- 系统性能不佳
- 存储空间不足

Verdict - Good tablet for simple applications

In review: Lenovo Tab M7. Test device was provided courtesy of: Cyberport
In review: Lenovo Tab M7. Test device was provided courtesy of: Cyberport

Lenovo Tab M7没有强大的功能。 基准性能测试结果不是很好,而且Wi-Fi和存储空间差强人意。 说到续航时间,具有如此低功耗的设备可能会从其3500mAh电池中受益匪浅。

Lenovo Tab M7是正在寻找具有原生Android体验的简单平板电脑的人的选择。

归根结底,我们非常喜欢Tab M7。 构建质量很稳定,与Amazon Fire 7不同,它没有厚厚的,令人讨厌的屏幕边框。基础版的Android Go仅售79欧元(约合88美元),是亚马逊Fire OS的很好替代品,后者具有许多专有的亚马逊应用程序。 那些正在寻找便宜小巧的平板电脑(主要用于上网和偶尔观看视频的人)的Lenovo Tab M7代表着价格相对合理的相对较高质量的设备。

Lenovo Tab M7 - 12/27/2019 v7 (old)
Mike Wobker

Chassis
83 / 98 → 85%
Keyboard
65 / 80 → 82%
Pointing Device
83%
Connectivity
29 / 70 → 42%
Weight
87 / 40-88 → 99%
Battery
73%
Display
80%
Games Performance
2 / 78 → 3%
Application Performance
14 / 92 → 15%
Temperature
95%
Noise
100%
Audio
70 / 91 → 77%
Camera
32 / 85 → 37%
Average
63%
75%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Lenovo Tab M7平板电脑评测:装了安卓Go的Kindle杀手
Mike Wobker, 2020-02-25 (Update: 2020-02-25)