结论 - AMD Zenbook S16 是一款出色的日常笔记本电脑
凭借 Zenbook S16,华硕继续为日常使用提供高品质、超薄的 16 英寸笔记本电脑,并在 2026 型号年进行了小幅改进。新的 Ryzen AI 9 465 在性能模式下的功耗限制有所提高,但代价是风扇的噪音明显增大。不过,在其他两种能耗模式下,笔记本电脑的噪音仍然明显降低,性能也完全能够满足日常使用。
良好的输入设备保持不变;OLED 屏幕现在更亮了(尤其是在 HDR 下),并支持触摸输入。电池续航时间也有所改善,扬声器也非常出色。
总之,如果你正在寻找一款适合日常使用的高品质轻薄伴侣,Zenbook S16 是一款出色的全能产品。
Pros
Cons
华硕在 2026 年更新了 Zenbook S16,并依靠新的 AMD Ryzen 400 处理器、新的 OLED 触摸屏和更大的电池。
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
箱子和设备
与前代产品相比,该机的外壳几乎没有变化,其超薄和高品质的设计继续给人留下深刻印象。这次,我们的测试设备采用深灰色,看起来非常优雅。显示屏盖子上的线条被去掉了,Zenbook 标志现在居中。此外,ProArt 的小标志也从键盘上方移到了 ClickPad 的右上角。在去年的机型上,盖子的轻微吱吱声仍然令人讨厌,而现在的版本已不再是问题。其他设备与 前代产品升级选项仍然仅限于固态硬盘。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (21.1 - 531, n=46, last 2 years) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (27.4 - 1455, n=46, last 2 years) | |
| Networking | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |

输入设备
输入设备也与 前代.尽管行程较短(1.1 毫米),但打字手感非常好,大尺寸 ClickPad 也令人信服。
显示屏 - 改良型 OLED
华硕现在使用不同的三星 OLED 屏幕,支持触摸输入。这导致图像颗粒感稍强,尤其是在明亮的表面上,而旧机型不存在这种情况。除此之外,画质依然出色:完美的黑阶、高对比度和鲜艳的色彩。得益于 120 Hz 的刷新率,运动非常流畅,PWM 频率也提高了一倍,达到了 960 Hz,因此问题应该会更少。
亮度也得到了提升。在 SDR 模式下,亮度略低于 470 cd/m²,而在 HDR 模式下,亮度可高达 1,094 cd/m²(全屏幕:701 cd/m²),与前代产品相比有了大幅提升。 前代产品(最大 525 cd/m²)相比有了大幅提升。随机提供的色彩配置文件也非常准确,图像处理没有任何问题。我们无法通过自己的校准来改善显示效果。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 465 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.76}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
94% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
99.8% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
CCT: 6458 K
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA ATNA60HR07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W ATNA60CL10-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V SDC41B6, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | HP OmniBook X Flip 16 Samsung SDC41BA, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G LG DISPLAY LP160WQ2-SPF1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 144 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition ATNA53JB01-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 15.3", 120 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | 0% | 0% | -3% | 0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 99.8 | 99.8 0% | 99.9 0% | 99.9 0% | 97.96 -2% | 100 0% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 100 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 94 | 94.6 1% | 94.6 1% | 95.2 1% | 86.65 -8% | 94.6 1% |
| Response Times | 25% | -1445% | 0% | -5239% | 15% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 1.27 ? | 0.4 ? 69% | 4.8 ? -278% | 0.8 ? 37% | 47 ? -3601% | 1.46 ? -15% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 0.43 ? | 0.6 ? -40% | 18 ? -4086% | 0.9 ? -109% | 30 ? -6877% | 0.44 ? -2% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 960 ? | 480 | 481 | 473.8 ? | 1200 ? | |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 56 | 30 46% | 39 30% | 15 73% | 22 61% | |
| Screen | -18% | -4% | -54% | 8% | 7% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 465 | 391 -16% | 425 -9% | 381.1 -18% | 442 -5% | 509 9% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 466 | 391 -16% | 421 -10% | 381 -18% | 406 -13% | 508 9% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 99 | 98 -1% | 98 -1% | 98 -1% | 86 -13% | 97 -2% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.02 | 0.0219 | 0.17 | 0.01 | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1 | 1.42 -42% | 1.73 -73% | 3.3 -230% | 0.84 16% | 1.1 -10% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3 | 4.69 -56% | 3.82 -27% | 6.3 -110% | 1.62 46% | 2.5 17% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 1.5 21% | 0.09 95% | 0.9 53% | 1.53 19% | 1.5 21% |
| Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.199 100% | 2.346 94% | 2.23 99% | 2.173 101% | 2.28 96% |
| CCT | 6458 101% | 6684 97% | 6432 101% | 6369 102% | 6496 100% | 6294 103% |
| Contrast (:1) | 19550 | 19406 | 2600 | 50900 | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.49 | 0.88 | ||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 2% /
-3% | -483% /
-363% | -18% /
-27% | -1745% /
-949% | 7% /
7% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.24 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.21 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.1 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.27 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.5 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 960 Hz Amplitude: 56 % | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 960 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 960 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8082 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能 - Ryzen 400(Gorgon Point)
#0 More than one webp image found in the DB for sys_file_uid 3060816 and the given size +0s ... 0.165s
测试条件
华硕更改了能源配置文件和相关的功率限制。以前最大功率为 33 瓦,而现在在性能配置文件中为 45/35 瓦。为了获得最高性能,我们在性能模式下运行了以下基准测试。不过,在日常使用中,其他两种模式("悄悄话"和 "标准")也完全够用,而且风扇在负载情况下仍然非常安静。
处理器
在 CPU分析中中,我们已经对新款 AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 进行了深入了解。总体而言,与之前的 Ryzen 300 系列相比,只有微小的改进,尤其是多核性能,仍然具有竞争力。在连续负载和电池模式下,性能也相当稳定。
Cinebench R15 多回路
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W -2! | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V -2! | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G -2! | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
| Average of class Multimedia (327 - 2069, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 (768 - 953, n=4) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
| Average of class Multimedia (72.5 - 200, n=52, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 (n=1) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 (n=1) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4861 - 33362, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 (n=1) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1128 - 2459, n=73, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 (n=1) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1887 - 12912, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 (n=1) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (420 - 853, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (856 - 5224, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 326, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 (n=1) | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Average of class Multimedia (100 - 557, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 (n=1) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (29095 - 130368, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 (n=1) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3666 - 7545, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| Geekbench 6.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 (13600 - 14562, n=2) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4983 - 25760, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| Geekbench 6.5 / Single-Core | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 (2834 - 2924, n=2) | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 4326, n=73, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 (n=1) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4652 - 20422, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 (n=1) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average of class Multimedia (805 - 2974, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 (n=1) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 36.1, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 (n=1) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Average of class Multimedia (23.9 - 146.7, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 (n=1) | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 (n=1) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Average of class Multimedia (2214 - 50388, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 (n=1) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Average of class Multimedia (13483 - 181505, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 (n=1) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 28794, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 (n=1) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1014 - 26875, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 (n=1) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Average of class Multimedia (12860 - 65787, n=61, last 2 years) | |
系统性能
主观性能印象非常好,基准测试结果也证明了其高性能。稳定性也没有问题。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465, AMD Radeon 880M | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W -5! | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465, AMD Radeon 880M (n=1) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4325 - 10386, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465, AMD Radeon 880M (n=1) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8025 - 11664, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465, AMD Radeon 880M (n=1) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7323 - 18233, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465, AMD Radeon 880M (n=1) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 16240, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Average of class Multimedia (866 - 2426, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465, AMD Radeon 880M (n=1) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2344, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465, AMD Radeon 880M (n=1) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Average of class Multimedia (907 - 2820, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465, AMD Radeon 880M (n=1) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Average of class Multimedia (605 - 2024, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465, AMD Radeon 880M (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465, AMD Radeon 880M (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Average of class Multimedia (167.3 - 384, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465, AMD Radeon 880M (n=1) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465, AMD Radeon 880M (n=1) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average of class Multimedia (228 - 835, n=71, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 8545 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 (n=1) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Average of class Multimedia (21158 - 109252, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 (n=1) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average of class Multimedia (19699 - 132641, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 (n=1) | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Average of class Multimedia (17733 - 134966, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Average of class Multimedia (0 - 535, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
* ... smaller is better
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
测试设备中的 1 TB SSD 来自闪迪,传输速率很高,即使在持续负载的情况下也能保持稳定的性能。
* ... smaller is better
连续读取:DiskSpd 循环读取,队列深度 8
图形处理器性能
我们熟悉的 Radeon 880M 再次被用作 iGPU,由于功耗限制更高,内存速度稍快,在基准测试中的性能略有提升。不过,差异并不大,游戏性能也没有太大变化。在持续负载和电池模式下,GPU 性能都保持稳定。
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 44773 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 13977 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8274 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 4077 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 732 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 3421 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
| Average of class Multimedia (160 - 1042, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Radeon 880M (269 - 429, n=7) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606-RK333W | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Average of class Multimedia (106 - 401, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
* ... smaller is better
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 31.2 | |||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 171.8 | 146.6 | 97.8 | 86.2 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 91 | 42.9 | 30.6 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 77.5 | 60.1 | 46.4 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 178.8 | 70.3 | 58.2 | 48.7 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 41.3 | 34.6 | 28.7 | 28 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 47.6 | 36.8 | 28.2 | 24.3 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 84.2 | 75.5 | 55.4 | 12.4 |
排放与能源
噪音排放
Noise level
| Idle |
| 24.9 / 24.9 / 24.9 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 45.7 / 50.4 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: | ||
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA Ryzen AI 9 465, Radeon 880M | Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M | Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V Core Ultra 9 288V, Arc 140V | HP OmniBook X Flip 16 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V | Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 12% | 1% | 3% | 2% | 9% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 24.9 | 24 4% | 25.8 -4% | 27.5 -10% | 25.2 -1% | 24.4 2% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 24.9 | 24 4% | 25.8 -4% | 28 -12% | 25.2 -1% | 24.4 2% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 24.9 | 25 -0% | 25.8 -4% | 28.3 -14% | 25.2 -1% | 24.4 2% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 24.9 | 26 -4% | 26.7 -7% | 28.3 -14% | 27.7 -11% | 24.4 2% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 45.7 | 35 23% | 37.7 18% | 35.8 22% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 49 | 36 27% | 44.4 9% | 36.2 26% | 42.6 13% | 39.4 20% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 50.4 | 36 29% | 41.1 18% | 37.6 25% | 42.7 15% | 45 11% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.9 °C / 85.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-1.2 °C / -2.1 F).
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA Ryzen AI 9 465, Radeon 880M | Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M | Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V Core Ultra 9 288V, Arc 140V | HP OmniBook X Flip 16 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V | Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -16% | 7% | 10% | 0% | 9% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 43.4 | 48 -11% | 37.9 13% | 38 12% | 40.5 7% | 42.1 3% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 46.2 | 53 -15% | 31.5 32% | 39.4 15% | 45 3% | 39.5 15% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 26.5 | 31 -17% | 28.3 -7% | 25 6% | 27.1 -2% | 24.5 8% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 27 | 32 -19% | 29.7 -10% | 25 7% | 28.8 -7% | 24.4 10% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 8.2% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
耗电量
怠速时的耗电量比以前略低,但在负载情况下,功率限制的增加非常明显。我们测得的最大功率为 76.9 瓦,然后很快稳定在 60 瓦左右。在欧盟国家,Zenbook S16 不带电源装置。
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA Ryzen AI 9 465, Radeon 880M, SanDisk PC SN5100S, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V Core Ultra 9 288V, Arc 140V, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | HP OmniBook X Flip 16 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, , OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00, OLED, 2880x1800, 15.3" | Average AMD Radeon 880M | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -4% | -1% | 16% | 7% | 32% | -20% | -39% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 3.7 | 6 -62% | 5.7 -54% | 3.1 16% | 4.15 -12% | 2.4 35% | 5.24 ? -42% | 5.95 ? -61% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 7.4 | 7 5% | 7.4 -0% | 4.4 41% | 5.4 27% | 3.9 47% | 9.17 ? -24% | 10.3 ? -39% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 9.5 | 13 -37% | 7.9 17% | 11.4 -20% | 12.4 -31% | 5.1 46% | 10.6 ? -12% | 12.4 ? -31% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 57.9 | 44 24% | 38.3 34% | 42.5 27% | 64.7 ? -12% | 68 ? -17% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 58.5 | 44.6 24% | 49.8 15% | 53.1 9% | 48.2 18% | 43.5 26% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 57 | 48.7 15% | 48.1 16% | 40.2 29% | ||||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 76.9 | 58 25% | 65.41 15% | 64.9 16% | 60.049 22% | 64.4 16% | 83.8 ? -9% | 114.4 ? -49% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
带外部监视器时的耗电量
电池寿命
华硕将电池容量从 78 Wh 提高到 83 Wh,在 150 cd/m² 的 WLAN 测试中,电池续航时间从 12 小时提高到 13 小时多一点。不过,由于显示屏更亮,最大亮度下的优势被拉平了。
Notebookcheck 总体评分
Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA
- 02/05/2026 v8
Andreas Osthoff
可比较的替代品
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 ⎘ AMD Radeon 880M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. 65W Type C Charger Compatibl... 2. Laptop Case for ASUS Zenbook... 3. Puccy 3 Pack Screen Protecto... List Price: 1799€ | 1.5 kg | 12.9 mm | 16.00" 2880x1800 212 PPI OLED | |
| Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 ⎘ AMD Radeon 880M ⎘ 24 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. (3 Pack) Designed for 2024 N... 2. ASUS Zenbook S 16 Laptop, AM... 3. HIDevolution [2024] ASUS Zen... List Price: 1700 EUR | 1.5 kg | 12.9 mm | 16.00" 2880x1800 212 PPI OLED | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V Intel Core Ultra 9 288V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | 1.5 kg | 15.95 mm | 16.00" 2880x1800 212 PPI OLED | ||
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 16 GB Memory | Amazon: List Price: 950 USD | 1.9 kg | 15.5 mm | 16.00" 2880x1800 212 PPI OLED | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G Intel Core Ultra 7 256V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. LG gram Pro 16-inch Lightwei... 2. LG gram Pro 16-inch Lightwei... 3. 16IN LG Gram PRO 2 in 1 Note... List Price: 2050€ | 1.2 kg | 13 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. Lenovo ThinkPad X9 15 Aura E... 2. Lenovo ThinkPad X9 15 Aura E... 3. Lenovo ThinkPad X9 15 Aura E... List Price: 1989€ | 1.4 kg | 17.7 mm | 15.30" 2880x1800 222 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.


























































