Notebookcheck Logo
小米 Poco F7

小米 Poco F7 智能手机评测：讨价还价的潜在热门

经济实惠，可替代高端手机。

又一款 "旗舰杀手"？我们相信，小米 Poco F7 确实配得上这个称号。这款 6.83 英寸的手机售价不到 400 欧元，却拥有亮度极高的 AMOLED 面板、防水的金属和玻璃外壳、一流的性能和带 90 瓦快速充电功能的超大电池。我们的测试还显示了小米遗漏了哪些功能。
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

结论总体上仅有一些妥协

小米 Poco F7 在关键领域表现出色：其 120 Hz AMOLED 面板不仅亮度非常高，而且色彩准确度也很均衡；骁龙 8s Gen 4 帮助这款 6.83 英寸的 Poco 手机实现了一流的性能。Poco F7 的长续航时间和极短的充电时间也给人留下了深刻印象。其他优势还包括坚固的外壳（玻璃表面和窄显示屏边缘）、出色的主摄像头以及 2031 年前的操作系统更新保证。

虽然小米节省了一些功能，但列表仍然相对简单明了。Poco F7 与许多其他同价位的智能手机一样，都有诸如 USB 2.0 和缺乏无线充电功能等缺点。不过，尽管有 WiFi 7，但却不支持 6 GHz WLAN，也不能使用 eSIM 卡，这让我们感到遗憾。

Pros

+ 非常明亮的显示屏，120 Hz
+ 窄显示屏边缘
+ 高质量外壳，防护等级 IP68
+ 极高的系统性能
+ 出色的电池寿命
+ 高达 90 瓦的快速充电
+ 出色的主摄像头
+ 512 GB 存储空间
+ WiFi 7、蓝牙 6.0 和双卡双待
+ 更新至 2031 年

Cons

- 不支持 eSIM
- 带有广告的用户界面
- 无 6 GHz 无线局域网
- 无存储卡插槽
- 只有 USB 2.0
- 无全时在线显示屏
- 无无线充电功能

价格和供应情况

小米会不时推出针对其智能手机的折扣活动，包括在测试时。小米商店提供的 256 GB 版本的 Poco F7 售价为 400 欧元（约合 466 美元），而 512 GB 存储版本的 Poco F7 售价为 420 欧元（约合 490 美元）。亚马逊等其他在线零售商的价格与此类似。

Amazon Logo
$7.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco F7 5G Screen Protector with Camera Lens Protector, 9H Hardness Anti-Scratch Tempered Glass flim, Case Friendly, Anti-Fingerprint,Anti-Scratch (2+2 PACK)
  • $6.99
    Anoowkoa 2 Pack for Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro 5G/Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra 5G Screen Protector + 2 Pack Camera Lens Tempered Glass Protector.9H Hardness.Support Fingerprint Unlock Bubble-Free.Easy Installation
  • $7.99
    Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro/F7 Ultra 5G Screen Protector with Camera Lens Protector, 9H Hardness Anti-Scratch Tempered Glass flim, Case Friendly, Anti-Fingerprint,Anti-Scratch (2+2 PACK)
Bestpreis 392 € lilyinnov_0
Xiaomi Poco F7 512GB schwarz
2. 400 € os-062
3. 409 € rainbow mistore
4. 421 € Gomibo.de

小米于今年 3 月推出了 Poco F7 系列。Poco F7 是入门级机型，小米承诺其性能和效率不亚于旗舰级。搭载了 Poco F7 配备了骁龙 8 代 4 处理器，其 SoC 运算速度非常快，可与去年的顶级智能手机相媲美。在性能方面可与去年的顶级智能手机媲美。

Poco 手机在显示屏和电池方面也大有可为，前者达到了 6.83 英寸，据称亮度高达 3200 尼特。小米还称电池容量为 6500 毫安时，几乎没有其他中端智能手机能与之媲美。此外，还包括 90 瓦的充电功率。请在我们的评测中了解 Poco F7 能给竞争对手留下多少印象。

规格

Xiaomi Poco F7 (Poco F7 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 8 x 2 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-A720 / Cortex-X4
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 825
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5X
Display
6.83 inch 19.5:9, 2772 x 1280 pixel 447 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, 1700 nits brightness (HBM), 3200 nits (peak brightness), up to 480/2560 Hz touch sampling rate (regular/in-game), 3840 Hz PWM dimming, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB 
, 468 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity sensor, Accelerometer, electronic compass, IR blaster, Gyroscope, Flicker sensor, Camera2 API Level 3, DRM Widevine L1, OTG
Networking
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6.0, 2G (Band 2/3/5/8), 3G (Band 1/2/4/5/6/8/19), 4G (Band 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/18/19/20/26/28/38/40/41/42/48/66), 5G (Band 1/2/3/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41/48/66/77/78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.2 x 163.1 x 77.9
Battery
6500 mAh Lithium-Polymer, up to 90W charging, 22.5W reverse charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Sony IMX882, f/1.5, 26mm, OIS, 4-in-1 Pixel Binning, RAW support up to 12,5 MP) + 8 MP Ultrawide camera (OmniVision OV08F, f/2.2, 15mm), video recording up to 4K@60fps
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix (OmniVision OV20B, f/2.2), video recording up to 1080p@60fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, Keyboard: virtual, USB-C cable, SIM tool, protective case, quick start guide, warranty information, HyperOS 2.0, 12 Months Warranty, IP68 certified, Corning Gorilla Glass 7i (front), glass (back), aluminium frame; HDR support: Dolby Vision, HDR10, HDR10+, HLG; GPS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1, E5a), Beidou (B1, B2a), QZSS (L1, L5), NavIC (L5); Connectivity: Dual Nano SIM + VoLTE/WiFI calling; Bluetooth codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LDAC, LHDC V1-V5, fanless, waterproof
Weight
215.7 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳 - Poco F7，玻璃表面和铝制边框

Poco F7 的所有颜色（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
Poco F7 的所有颜色

尺寸为 163.1 x 77.9 毫米，扁平 8.2 毫米的 Poco F7 体积相当庞大，重量不到 216 克，也比同等尺寸的同类设备重一些。之所以采用 XXL 尺寸，主要是因为配备了超大容量的 6500 毫安时电池，为这款 6.83 英寸的智能手机提供了出色的续航能力。

Poco F7 有黑色、白色和银色三种颜色可选，采用哑光铝合金边框，边角弧度较大，握持舒适。显示屏边框的左、右、顶部宽度仅为 1.5 毫米。虽然底部仅有不到 2 毫米，但 Poco F7 仍拥有 94% 的出色屏占比。

AMOLED 面板由大猩猩 7i 玻璃保护，背面也有玻璃盖板。这看起来很高档，但也使 Poco F7 成为指纹磁铁。

双摄像头从后盖突出约 2.5 毫米，如果不加保护盖放在桌子上，很快就会导致智能手机晃动。

尺寸比较

❌
163.1 mm 77.9 mm 8.2 mm 215.7 g162.42 mm 76.13 mm 8.3 mm 206 g162.2 mm 77.5 mm 7.4 mm 198 g160.6 mm 75.59 mm 8.99 mm 218 g161.2 mm 73 mm 8.2 mm 186 g160.5 mm 74.4 mm 7.8 mm 179 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

功能 - 12 GB RAM 和高达 512 GB 内存

Poco F7 有两种存储配置可供选择：

  • 12GB LPDDR5 内存 + 256GB UFS 4.1 大容量存储：建议零售价 450 欧元
  • 12GB LPDDR5 内存 + 512GB UFS 4.1 大容量存储：500欧元建议零售价

除了高性能的内存/大容量存储配置外，可以看出 Poco F7 在某些方面只提供了中端手机的功能，而价格却是中端手机的价格。

这一点在 NFC、红外爆破器（有趣的是它位于相机模块旁边）和立体声扬声器等功能上体现得并不明显，但在 USB-C 端口上却很明显，它只能以 USB 2.0 的速度工作。不过，在三星 PSSD T7 的拷贝测试中，它的数据吞吐量达到了 37.2 MB/s，符合 USB 2.0 标准。

由于价格原因，设备进一步妥协：Poco F7 不支持 eSIM 卡，也没有永久激活的始终在线显示屏。显示屏最多只能显示 10 秒钟，要么是在轻触屏幕后，要么是在自拍相机识别到您已注视屏幕时。

左：无连接
左：无连接
右侧：音量摇杆、电源按钮
右侧：音量摇杆、电源按钮
首页: 麦克风
首页: 麦克风
底部：扬声器、USB-C 2.0、麦克风、双 SIM 卡
底部：扬声器、USB-C 2.0、麦克风、双 SIM 卡

软件 -Android 15 和 2031 年之前的更新

Poco F7 运行基于Android 15 的小米内部操作系统 HyperOS 2.0。遗憾的是，广告也作为标准配置出现在 UI 中。

小米承诺在 4 年内对操作系统进行升级，还希望在 6 年内为智能手机提供Android 安全更新。后者每 90 天更新一次。在测试时（8 月中旬），安全更新截至 6 月 1 日，因此按照 Poco 的标准是最新的。

小米 Poco F7
小米 Poco F7
小米 Poco F7
小米 Poco F7
小米 Poco F7
小米 Poco F7

可持续性

Poco 为通过其网站购买的产品提供以旧换新计划。.制造商没有提供智能手机中回收材料数量的详细信息，因此无法对碳足迹做出说明。Poco 不提供备件或维修手册。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 7，但无 6 GHz 频段

Poco F7 配备了 WiFi 7、NFC 和蓝牙 6.0，在通信设备方面非常先进。此外，Poco F7 还配备了多种移动频率，因此几乎在任何地方都能接收到信号。

与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 连接后，Poco F7 在 5 GHz 频段实现了稳定而快速的传输速率。峰值传输速率达到 939 Mb/s，与对比设备不相上下。不过，尽管有 WiFi 7，这款智能手机却不支持 6 GHz 频段。

Networking
Xiaomi Poco F7
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
982 (min: 492) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
939 (min: 866) MBit/s ∼86%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
990 (min: 879) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1574 (min: 1183) MBit/s ∼100%
Nothing Phone (3)
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
980 (min: 492) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
834 (min: 774) MBit/s ∼77%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1856 (min: 1764) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1577 (min: 1279) MBit/s ∼100%
Realme GT 7
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
976 (min: 936) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
939 (min: 926) MBit/s ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
766 (min: 698) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
666 (min: 568) MBit/s ∼61%
Xiaomi Poco F6
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
897 (min: 597) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
830 (min: 800) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1331 (min: 654) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1554 (min: 1445) MBit/s ∼99%
Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1019 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1088 (min: 768) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1265 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1451 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼92%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
724 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
736 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1364 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1398 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼89%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco F7 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø966 (492-1000)
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø766 (698-805)
Xiaomi Poco F7 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø937 (866-953)
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø666 (568-772)
楼内 GPS 接收
楼内 GPS 接收
户外 GPS 接收
户外 GPS 接收

Poco F7 支持所有主要的 GPS 服务，在测试过程中能快速准确地确定我们当前的位置，精确度在 3 米以内。

在骑行 10 公里的过程中，这款智能手机的精确度几乎与 Garmin Venu 2 健身智能手表相当。

GPS 测试：总结
GPS 测试：总结
GPS 测试：环湖航行
GPS 测试：环湖航行
GPS 测试：转折点
GPS 测试：转折点

电话功能和语音质量

Poco F7 有两个麦克风和两个 nano SIM 卡空间。除了 VoLTE 外，它还支持 WiFi 通话，允许您通过家庭 WiFi 拨打电话。

我们对语音质量没有任何抱怨。在测试中，声音还原清晰，噪音抑制也能可靠地工作。

摄像头 - 5000 万像素和 800 万像素双摄像头

前置摄像头拍摄的照片
前置摄像头拍摄的照片

手机摄影师只能使用 Poco F7 的两个后置摄像头：一个采用索尼 IMX882 图像传感器的 5000 万像素光学防抖镜头和一个基于 OmniVision OV08F 的 800 万像素超广角摄像头。没有微距功能。

2000 万像素自拍摄像头（OmniVision OV20B）可拍摄出不错的照片，并实现了良好的虚化效果，但容易使图像模糊，缺乏清晰度。不过，对于视频通话或快照来说，质量还是足够的。

主摄像头在日光下拍摄的照片效果不错。照片细节丰富，看起来很自然，曝光均匀，但色彩还原总体上可以做得更好。在弱光环境下，主摄像头的表现仍能令这款智能手机的同价位产品满意。不过，它无法再清晰地捕捉细节，这意味着色彩比较单一的图像区域往往会被冲淡。主摄像头可将图像进行高达 10 倍的数字放大，放大 5 倍的图像看起来仍然相当清晰。

超广角摄像头的像素为 800 万像素，在双摄像头中只能排在第二位，但它的表现一点也不差。其图像色彩丰富，但边缘模糊和失焦现象严重。

主摄像头能以每秒 60 帧的速度录制高达 4K 的视频，并能在日光下拍摄稳定度良好的视频。两个镜头之间的切换最高只能达到每秒 30 帧的 1080p。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide-angle5x ZoomLow light
orginal image
click to load images

在受控照明条件下，相机必须在测试实验室中再次证明自己的技术。

在最佳照明条件下，它能相当准确地捕捉到 ColorChecker 色度表中的颜色，但对于一些红色和棕色色调以及中灰色调，则略微偏离理想线。另一方面，主摄像头即使在 1 勒克斯的残余光线下也能完整、清晰地捕捉测试图表。

ColorChecker
15 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
10 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
6 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
8 ∆E
4 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco F7: 9.74 ∆E min: 2.89 - max: 19.29 ∆E
ColorChecker
19.7 ∆E
22.4 ∆E
25 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
36 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
25.9 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
21.3 ∆E
28.8 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
26.6 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco F7: 22.93 ∆E min: 10.5 - max: 35.99 ∆E

附件和保修 - 无电源装置，可选择延长保修期

可选的 90 瓦电源装置。
可选的 90 瓦电源装置。

Poco F7 随附 USB 数据线（Type-A 转 Type-C）、SIM 卡工具、保护盖、快速入门指南和保修信息。90 瓦电源装置可在 Poco 网上商店购买，售价 40 欧元。

Poco F7 在欧盟地区的保修期为 12 个月。可通过Xiaomi Care 保险套餐延长保修期。可为智能手机提供为期 2 年的意外损坏和失窃保险。根据所选套餐的不同，价格为 39 或 59 欧元。

输入设备和操作 - 反应灵敏的触摸屏，采样频率为 480 赫兹

Poco F7 能快速、准确地处理 AMOLED 屏幕上的输入内容，并精确到显示屏的各个角落。据小米称，屏幕扫描频率高达每秒 480 次，在游戏中最高可达 2560 Hz。

总的来说，Poco F7 可以非常流畅地操作，在测试中没有被任何应用程序拖慢速度。智能手机的线性振动电机可提供精确的触觉反馈。

位于显示屏下方的指纹传感器可以可靠地识别注册指纹。用户还可以通过自拍相机的二维人脸识别功能进行生物认证。这种方式的安全性明显低于指纹传感器，但在测试中也同样顺畅。

纵向键盘
纵向键盘
横向键盘
横向键盘

显示屏 - 非常明亮的 AMOLED 面板，具有高效的 PWM 调光功能

子像素结构
子像素结构

6.83 英寸 AMOLED 屏幕的分辨率为 2772 x 1280 像素，像素密度高达 447 PPI。除了 HDR10 和 HDR10+，它还支持 Dolby Vision 和 HLG。

屏幕的主动 PWM 调光功能将使敏感用户受益匪浅。我们测得的基本闪烁频率为 120 Hz，PWM 调光频率高达 3846 Hz（制造商规格为 3840 Hz），其特点还在于振幅曲线较低。

在屏幕亮度方面，Poco F7 的表现在中端市场中名列前茅。即使在全白显示的情况下，AMOLED 屏幕的平均亮度也能达到 1637 cd/m²，非常出色，而在小图像部分（APL18），亮度则进一步提高到 3318 cd/m²。在 HDR 模式下，我们测得的峰值亮度为 3272 cd/m²，几乎与 SDR 模式下的峰值亮度一样高。

1686
cd/m²		1608
cd/m²		1636
cd/m²
1659
cd/m²		1616
cd/m²		1650
cd/m²
1620
cd/m²		1617
cd/m²		1642
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1686 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1637.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.14 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 1616 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.1 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.82}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
98.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
CCT: 6639 K
Xiaomi Poco F7
AMOLED, 2772x1280, 6.8"		Motorola Edge 60 Pro
P-OLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"		Nothing Phone (3)
AMOLED, 2800x1260, 6.7"		Realme GT 7
OLED, 2780x1264, 6.8"		Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"		Xiaomi Poco F6
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Screen
-1%
-45%
15%
-22%
-27%
Brightness middle
1616
1099
-32%
1548
-4%
1519
-6%
1184
-27%
1031
-36%
Brightness
1637
1073
-34%
1535
-6%
1530
-7%
1179
-28%
1028
-37%
Brightness Distribution
95
91
-4%
98
3%
97
2%
99
4%
96
1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.1
1.25
-14%
2.2
-100%
1
9%
1.7
-55%
1.4
-27%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.8
1.68
40%
5.5
-96%
1.7
39%
3.2
-14%
3.7
-32%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.2
1.4
36%
3.7
-68%
1.1
50%
2.4
-9%
2.9
-32%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.031 108%
2.26 97%
2.22 99%
2.12 104%
2.21 100%
CCT
6639 98%
6403 102%
6787 96%
6661 98%
6544 99%
6560 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 16.95 %
Secondary Frequency: 3846 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8291 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）

AMOLED 屏幕不仅亮度惊人，而且画质出色。在色彩准确度和其他图像参数方面，在启用原色专业版预设值后，显示屏几乎达到了理想状态。

色彩保真度（色彩方案原色 Pro、色温暖色、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩保真度（色彩方案原色 Pro、色温暖色、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩方案原色 Pro、色温暖色、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩方案原色 Pro、色温暖色、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（色彩方案原色 Pro、色温暖色、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（色彩方案原色 Pro、色温暖色、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩饱和度（色彩方案为 Pro 原色，色温为暖色，目标色彩空间为 sRGB）
色彩饱和度（色彩方案为 Pro 原色，色温为暖色，目标色彩空间为 sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5555 ms rise
↘ 0.5395 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.06 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5125 ms rise
↘ 0.5515 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32 ms).

Poco F7 是户外不可忽视的力量。即使在阳光直射下，可视角度稳定的显示屏上的内容依然清晰可见。您一定要让亮度传感器处于激活状态，因为在没有传感器的情况下，最大显示亮度仅为 627 cd/m²。

室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
视角
视角

性能 - 配备骁龙 8s 第 4 代处理器的 Poco F7

Poco F7 是首批搭载 骁龙 8s 第 4 代SoC 的智能手机之一。这款 4 纳米芯片是骁龙 8s 的廉价替代品。 骁龙 8 Elite的廉价替代品。 Poco F7 Ultra据说其 CPU 性能比 骁龙 8s Gen 3.

Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 虽然没有达到 Snapdragon 8 Elite 的性能，但日常使用绰绰有余，可以与顶级机型相媲美。同样快的还有 联发科 Dimensity 9400e的 realme GT 7.

Geekbench 6.4 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench AI | AI Benchmark
Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
2265 Points +6%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
2212 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735
  (2129 - 2212, n=2)
2171 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco F7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
2129 Points
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1930 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3479, n=206, last 2 years)
1647 Points -23%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1457 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
1380 Points -35%
Multi-Core
Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
7439 Points +10%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
7161 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735
  (6792 - 7161, n=2)
6977 Points +3%
Xiaomi Poco F7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
6792 Points
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
4876 Points -28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=206, last 2 years)
4779 Points -30%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4616 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
3890 Points -43%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
2147494 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco F7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
2043045 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735
  (1975046 - 2043045, n=2)
2009046 Points -2%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
1975046 Points -3%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1508271 Points -26%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1409057 Points -31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=147, last 2 years)
1356630 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
901303 Points -56%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
19261 Points +21%
Xiaomi Poco F7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
15973 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735
  (15928 - 15973, n=2)
15951 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
15928 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
15547 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=191, last 2 years)
14387 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
14298 Points -10%
Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
13240 Points -17%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
10673 Points +7%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
9953 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735
  (9930 - 9953, n=2)
9942 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
9930 Points
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
8810 Points -11%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
7178 Points -28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 14066, n=148, last 2 years)
7167 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
5881 Points -41%
System
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
13008 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
12947 Points
Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
12209 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735
  (11169 - 12947, n=2)
12058 Points -7%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
11169 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 20776, n=148, last 2 years)
10929 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
9765 Points -25%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
8213 Points -37%
Memory
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
13961 Points +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735
  (11058 - 13961, n=2)
12510 Points +13%
Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
11341 Points +3%
Xiaomi Poco F7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
11058 Points
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
9774 Points -12%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
8146 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 20652, n=148, last 2 years)
8093 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
6960 Points -37%
Graphics
Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
53763 Points +62%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
33672 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735
  (33256 - 33672, n=2)
33464 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco F7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
33256 Points
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
26226 Points -21%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
26099 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1046 - 384996, n=148, last 2 years)
23437 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
10319 Points -69%
Web
Xiaomi Poco F7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
2042 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735
  (1869 - 2042, n=2)
1956 Points -4%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
1869 Points -8%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1806 Points -12%
Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
1743 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
1706 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 2363, n=148, last 2 years)
1643 Points -20%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1521 Points -26%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
63113 Points +284%
Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
59971 Points +265%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3769 - 81594, n=140, last 2 years)
19227 Points +17%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
17213 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735
  (16446 - 17213, n=2)
16830 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco F7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
16446 Points
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
15559 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
11181 Points -32%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=127, last 2 years)
26880 Points +1835%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
1474 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735
  (1389 - 1474, n=2)
1432 Points +3%
Xiaomi Poco F7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
1389 Points
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1183 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
926 Points -33%
Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
Points -100%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.4
Average of class Smartphone
  (231 - 1131, n=19, last 2 years)
537 Points +15%
Xiaomi Poco F7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
468 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735
  (451 - 468, n=2)
460 Points -2%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
451 Points -4%
Half Precision NPU 1.4
Average of class Smartphone
  (231 - 4555, n=19, last 2 years)
1074 Points +130%
Xiaomi Poco F7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
466 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735
  (451 - 466, n=2)
459 Points -2%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
451 Points -3%
Quantized NPU 1.4
Average of class Smartphone
  (133 - 4549, n=19, last 2 years)
1731 Points +68%
Xiaomi Poco F7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
1028 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735
  (997 - 1028, n=2)
1013 Points -1%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
997 Points -3%
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
3334 Points +1619%
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.4 - 3334, n=41, last 2 years)
911 Points +370%
Xiaomi Poco F7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
194 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735
  (175 - 194, n=2)
184.5 Points -5%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
175 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
114 Points -41%
Score V6
Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
9538 Points +59%
Xiaomi Poco F7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
6000 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735
  (5828 - 6000, n=2)
5914 Points -1%
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384
5828 Points -3%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4443 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68.9 - 12578, n=58, last 2 years)
4298 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
301 Points -95%

在 GPU 基准测试中 骁龙 8s 第 4 代 在 GPU 基准测试中的表现要比其前代产品好得多。同时，Poco F7 的 Adreno 825GPU 的 Poco F7 也是少数几款能在 GFXBench 的 4K 阿兹台克遗址基准测试中突破 30 FPS 大关的中端智能手机之一。手机 Immortalis-G720 MP12图形处理器 realme GT 7在某些基准测试中甚至更快一些。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5466 Points +24%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4490 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
4408 Points
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3060 Points -31%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3004 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1362 Points -69%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5300 Points +18%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4529 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
4482 Points
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3110 Points -31%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3078 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1382 Points -69%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
18461 Points +5%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
17885 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
17504 Points
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12149 Points -31%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10786 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5237 Points -70%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8357 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
8264 Points
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8165 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5188 Points -37%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5058 Points -39%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8624 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
8568 Points
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8407 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5071 Points -41%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4946 Points -42%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1775 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
1697 Points
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1525 Points -10%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1218 Points -28%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1041 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
659 Points -61%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
1785 Points
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1784 Points 0%
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1574 Points -12%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1222 Points -32%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1080 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
654 Points -63%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
116 fps -3%
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
831 fps +41%
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
590 fps
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
585 fps -1%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
464 fps -21%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
460 fps -22%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
156 fps -74%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97 fps -19%
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65 fps -46%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
332 fps +7%
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
311 fps
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
226 fps -27%
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
221 fps -29%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
211 fps -32%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps -64%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
117 fps -2%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
113 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps -38%
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
255 fps
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
253 fps -1%
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
201 fps -21%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
181 fps -29%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
171 fps -33%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
85 fps -67%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
90 fps
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
79 fps -12%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
73 fps -19%
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -33%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -33%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps -53%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
143 fps +1%
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
142 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
142 fps
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
106 fps -25%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
99 fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47 fps -67%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
87 fps
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65 fps -25%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -31%
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -31%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -31%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps -59%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
94 fps +19%
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
79 fps
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
79 fps 0%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps -33%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
48 fps -39%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
26 fps -67%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
102 fps -15%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
89 fps -26%
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps -56%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
236 fps +15%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
208 fps +1%
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
205 fps
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
141 fps -31%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps -41%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps -68%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
42 fps +20%
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
35 fps
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35 fps 0%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps -31%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
22 fps -37%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12 fps -66%

浏览器基准测试对 Poco F7 没有任何挑战，因为它在测试领域几乎总是名列前茅。即使不知道具体结果，你也可以看到网站加载速度很快，浏览时没有任何卡顿。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F7 (Chrome 138.0.7204.168)
236.729 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 (233 - 237, n=2)
235 Points -1%
Nothing Phone (3) (Chrome 138.0.7204.179)
232.968 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco F6 (Chrome 127.0.6533.64)
210.192 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134)
151.579 Points -36%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=153, last 2 years)
146.3 Points -38%
Realme GT 7 (Chrome 137)
144.405 Points -39%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115)
111.429 Points -53%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Nothing Phone (3) (Chrome 138.0.7204.179)
347 runs/min +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 (339 - 347, n=2)
343 runs/min +1%
Xiaomi Poco F7 (Chrome 138.0.7204.168)
339 runs/min
Xiaomi Poco F6 (Chrome 127.0.6533.64)
236 runs/min -30%
Realme GT 7 (Chrome 137)
198 runs/min -42%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134)
191 runs/min -44%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 585, n=136, last 2 years)
186.4 runs/min -45%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115)
158 runs/min -53%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Nothing Phone (3) (Chrome)
21.3 runs/min +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 (19.7 - 21.3, n=2)
20.5 runs/min +4%
Xiaomi Poco F7 (Chrome 138.0.7204.168)
19.7 runs/min
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=107, last 2 years)
12.8 runs/min -35%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134)
12 runs/min -39%
Xiaomi Poco F6 (Chrome 127.0.6533.64)
11.8 runs/min -40%
Realme GT 7 (Chrome 137)
11.4 runs/min -42%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi Poco F7 (Chrome 138.0.7204.168)
184 Points
Xiaomi Poco F6 (Chrome 127.0.6533.64)
183 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 (137 - 184, n=2)
160.5 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134)
138 Points -25%
Nothing Phone (3) (Chrome 138.0.7204.179)
137 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 273, n=146, last 2 years)
134.7 Points -27%
Realme GT 7 (Chrome 137)
119 Points -35%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115)
115 Points -37%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Nothing Phone (3) (Chrome 138.0.7204.179)
71875 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 (71781 - 71875, n=2)
71828 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F7 (Chrome 138.0.7204.168)
71781 Points
Xiaomi Poco F6 (Chrome 127.0.6533.64)
65175 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134)
50719 Points -29%
Realme GT 7 (Chrome 137)
46162 Points -36%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)
45541 Points -37%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115)
38258 Points -47%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=157, last 2 years)
1256 ms * -135%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro (Chrome 137.0.7151.115)
1087.5 ms * -104%
Realme GT 7 (Chrome 137)
897.5 ms * -68%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134)
792.6 ms * -48%
Xiaomi Poco F6 (Chrome 127.0.6533.64)
602.7 ms * -13%
Xiaomi Poco F7 (Chrome 138.0.7204.168)
534.1 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 (521 - 534, n=2)
528 ms * +1%
Nothing Phone (3) (Chrome 138.0.7204.179)
521.2 ms * +2%

* ... smaller is better

凭借 UFS 4.1 内存，Poco F7 的表现可圈可点。许多速度相当的中端手机都实现了类似的高数据吞吐量。在对比设备中，只有 三星Galaxy A56 5G速度较慢，因为它使用的是 UFS 3.1 内存。

Xiaomi Poco F7Motorola Edge 60 ProNothing Phone (3)Realme GT 7Samsung Galaxy A56 5GXiaomi Poco F6Average 512 GB UFS 4.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
12%
7%
9%
-59%
-12%
2%
-35%
Sequential Read 256KB
4042.86
3852.89
-5%
3720.79
-8%
3849.12
-5%
1634.8
-60%
4103.79
2%
3973 ?(3754 - 4110, n=12)
-2%
2200 ?(270 - 4370, n=189, last 2 years)
-46%
Sequential Write 256KB
4035.38
3842.42
-5%
3270.73
-19%
3442.58
-15%
999.95
-75%
3143.04
-22%
3591 ?(3095 - 4035, n=12)
-11%
1802 ?(103.2 - 4035, n=189, last 2 years)
-55%
Random Read 4KB
346.06
439.58
27%
438.57
27%
444.28
28%
207.01
-40%
312.22
-10%
374 ?(296 - 475, n=12)
8%
296 ?(47.6 - 504, n=189, last 2 years)
-14%
Random Write 4KB
453.7
585.66
29%
585.11
29%
578.79
28%
184.08
-59%
373.77
-18%
506 ?(309 - 678, n=12)
12%
341 ?(9.4 - 964, n=189, last 2 years)
-25%

游戏 - 游戏流畅度高达 120 FPS

Poco F7 在流畅显示当前游戏方面没有任何问题。Gamebench证明 骁龙 8s 第 4 代可确保在我们选择的少量游戏中流畅显示。在《PUBG Mobile》中，在图形级别为Liquid和帧速率设置为Ultra Extreme 的情况下也能达到 120 FPS。

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco F7; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 45.0.9a: Ø59.2 (51-61)
Xiaomi Poco F7; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 45.0.9a: Ø59.1 (51-61)
Xiaomi Poco F7; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 5.8.0_35245262_35356052: Ø59.6 (56-61)
Xiaomi Poco F7; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 5.8.0_35245262_35356052: Ø59.2 (54-61)
Xiaomi Poco F7; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.9.0: Ø118.4 (113-121)
Xiaomi Poco F7; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.9.0: Ø59.8 (58-61)
Xiaomi Poco F7; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 3.9.0: Ø39.6 (36-41)

排放 - Poco F7 发热问题

温度

在测试中，Poco F7 的温度经常过高。
在测试中，Poco F7 的温度经常过高。

骁龙 8s 骁龙 8s 第 4 代Poco F7 的运行速度非常快，但也不时将其内部散热系统推向极限。在连续负载的情况下，我们测得的表面温度高达 45.4 °C。这让人感觉不再舒适。

在某些 3DMark 压力测试中，Poco 手机会出现过热提示，从而导致测试中止。所有压力测试只有在 CPU 温度最初达到最高 30 °C 时才能完全运行。这需要智能手机冷却相当长的时间。在压力测试结束时，可以看到约有 1/3 的性能损失是由于节流造成的。

Max. Load
 44.8 °C45.2 °C44.6 °C 
 44.9 °C45.4 °C44.3 °C 
 44.7 °C45.1 °C42.1 °C 
Maximum: 45.4 °C
Average: 44.6 °C
43.1 °C44.2 °C44.2 °C
41.5 °C43.6 °C45.1 °C
41.2 °C43.3 °C43.6 °C
Maximum: 45.1 °C
Average: 43.3 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMarkSteel Nomad 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
99.5 % +30%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95.4 % +25%
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
76.3 %
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
73.5 % -4%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
63.8 % -16%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
42.2 % -45%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97.7 % +24%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82.3 % +5%
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
78.6 %
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65.9 % -16%
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
61.9 % -21%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
42.1 % -46%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
99.1 % +26%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
85 % +8%
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
78.5 %
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
77.2 % -2%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
41.3 % -47%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Realme GT 7
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
99.3 % +24%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.7 % +24%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88.4 % +11%
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
79.8 %
Nothing Phone (3)
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57.9 % -27%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
41.6 % -48%
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco F7 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø21.9 (20.8-26.4)
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø19.7 (17.2-27.8)
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø8.6 (8.48-8.68)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø77.6 (73.1-95.8)
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø72.7 (64-100.4)
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø32.2 (31.3-32.8)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø86.7 (81.2-104.1)
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø93.9 (88.2-109.2)
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø32.1 (31.4-33)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø22.4 (20.9-27.7)
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø19.7 (16.7-28.4)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø22.2 (20.9-26.6)
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø22.9 (21.3-27.6)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø11.2 (10.6-13.3)
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø10 (7.77-13.4)
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø4.85 (4.81-4.88)
小米 Poco F7
小米 Poco F7

发言人

Poco F7 能产生良好的立体声音效，对于智能手机扬声器来说，它通常会强调中高音，而低音则相对较弱。

USB-C 端口和蓝牙 6.0 可用于有线和无线音频输出。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.939.82524.129.83118.727.44025.528.15038.931.36321.524.78017.130.610022.234.412515.840.816015.653.320013.249.625013.453.731512.760.740011.661.650012.768.263014.270.680014.176.1100012.679.5125013.877.816001375.8200013.177.9250013.378.3315013.579.5400012.877.2500013.577.7630013.977.3800013.373.41000013.666.91250013.664.31600012.665.8SPL25.589N0.777.9median 13.4median 73.4Delta0.99.737.839.828.125.424.427.920.524.929.532.418.92517.727.515.831.313.436.113.947.611.249.510.453.611.752.810.1588.863.88.962.89.268.99.870.210.372.510.872.411.876.411.379.71277.21380.312.678.512.873.912.971.313.367.513.556.213.645.123.887.70.566.5median 11.8median 67.51.510.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Poco F7Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Poco F7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A56 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - Poco F7 可以持续运行

耗电量

与前代产品相比，Poco F7 在空闲时的耗电量大致相同。但在负载情况下，它比 Poco F6的功耗要低得多，也低于许多竞争对手，包括 摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Pro和 三星Galaxy A56 5G.

Poco F7 的 6500 毫安时电池充电功率可达 90 瓦。就其本身而言，这款智能手机可以充当能源供应商，因为它支持高达 22.5 瓦的有线反向充电。不过，Poco F7 不支持无线充电。

我们使用可选的 90 瓦电源装置进行测试。它能在 42 分钟内完成一个充电周期。您只需等待 31 分钟即可将电量充至 80%。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.07 / 0.26 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.18 / 1.44 / 1.48 Watt
Load midlight 7.62 / 8.92 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Poco F7
6500 mAh		Motorola Edge 60 Pro
6000 mAh		Nothing Phone (3)
5150 mAh		Realme GT 7
7000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Poco F6
5000 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-37%
45%
29%
-8%
5%
14%
1%
Idle Minimum *
1.18
1.3
-10%
0.4
66%
0.8
32%
0.72
39%
0.8
32%
0.79 ?(0.4 - 1.18, n=2)
33%
0.864 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=160, last 2 years)
27%
Idle Average *
1.44
1.9
-32%
0.7
51%
0.93
35%
1.45
-1%
1.13
22%
1.07 ?(0.7 - 1.44, n=2)
26%
1.428 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=160, last 2 years)
1%
Idle Maximum *
1.48
2.4
-62%
1.21
18%
1.19
20%
1.49
-1%
1.17
21%
1.345 ?(1.21 - 1.48, n=2)
9%
1.589 ?(0.85 - 4.46, n=160, last 2 years)
-7%
Load Average *
7.62
8.6
-13%
9.68
-27%
7.35
4%
7.62 ?(n=1)
-0%
7.2 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=142, last 2 years)
6%
Load Maximum *
8.92
14.9
-67%
13.39
-50%
13.76
-54%
8.92 ?(n=1)
-0%
10.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=142, last 2 years)
-21%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco F7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.06 (1.135-8.9)
Nothing Phone (3) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.52 (7.01-8.94)
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G Samsung Exynos 1580; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.54 (1.012-11)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.931 (0.834-1.294)
Nothing Phone (3) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.711 (0.699-0.781)
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G Samsung Exynos 1580; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.067 (1.034-1.349)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco F7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.85 (8.38-8.89)
Nothing Phone (3) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7 (7-7.03)
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G Samsung Exynos 1580; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.04 (5.72-7.42)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.931 (0.834-1.294)
Nothing Phone (3) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.711 (0.699-0.781)
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G Samsung Exynos 1580; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.067 (1.034-1.349)

电池寿命

Poco F7 的 6500 毫安时电池不仅是该价位中容量最大的电池之一，而且据小米称，这也是迄今为止 Poco F 系列所使用的最大电池。

Poco F7 在实际电池测试中表现出色。在连续循环播放高清视频时，它只用了不到 33 个小时就耗尽了电量，而在 WLAN 情景下则能使用近 23 个小时。在对比设备中，Poco F7 的表现仅次于 摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Pro和 realme GT 7，这是因为它们的电池同样大。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
40h 47min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 138.0.7204.168)
22h 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
32h 43min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 21min
Xiaomi Poco F7
6500 mAh		Motorola Edge 60 Pro
6000 mAh		Nothing Phone (3)
5150 mAh		Realme GT 7
7000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Poco F6
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-1%
-19%
5%
13%
-30%
Reader / Idle
2447
3173
30%
H.264
1963
2506
28%
WiFi v1.3
1363
1343
-1%
1103
-19%
1425
5%
1199
-12%
960
-30%
Load
201
215
7%

Notebookcheck 总体评分

小米 Poco F7 以其良好的性价比给人留下了深刻印象。明亮的显示屏、超长的电池续航时间和高性能等优点与相对较少的缺点（如不支持 eSIM 卡和没有无线充电功能）相抵消。

Xiaomi Poco F7 - 08/19/2025 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
90%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
53 / 69 → 77%
Weight
88%
Battery
93%
Display
93%
Games Performance
45 / 55 → 81%
Application Performance
75 / 85 → 89%
AI Performance
26%
Temperature
85%
Noise
100%
Audio
78 / 90 → 86%
Camera
75%
Average
64%
86%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
25%
Power Use
96.1%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
89%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 41.7%

可比较的替代品

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
85.5%
Xiaomi Poco F7
Xiaomi Poco F7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 825 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 		Amazon:
1. $7.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco F7 5...
2. $6.99
Anoowkoa 2 Pack for Xiaomi P...
3. $7.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco F7 P...
215.7 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.83"
2772x1280
447 PPI
AMOLED
2.
81.5%
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8350 ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 		Amazon:
1. $6.88
Natbok 2 Pack 3D Compatible ...
2. $6.88
Aiziki 2 Pack for Motorola E...
3. $9.88
LXEEOLX [2 Pack Hydrogel Scr...
List Price: 600 Euro		186 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"
2712x1220
446 PPI
P-OLED
3.
Nothing Phone (3)
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 825 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 		Amazon:
1. $348.00
Nothing Phone (3a) Smartphon...
2. $7.99
Senose Phone Wallet, 3 Pack ...
3. $6.99
JETech Screen Protector for ...
List Price: 899 Euro		218 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"
2800x1260
460 PPI
AMOLED
4.
83.2%
Realme GT 7
Realme GT 7
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e ⎘
ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 		Amazon:
1. $8.99
Suttkue for Realme GT 7 Scre...
2. $10.79
Ibywind 2 Pcs Screen Protect...
3. $8.88
NEOYUKL Privacy Screen Prote...
206 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"
2780x1264
450 PPI
OLED
5.
80%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Samsung Exynos 1580 ⎘
Samsung Xclipse 540 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 128 GB 		Amazon:
1. $6.89
NEW'C 3 Pack Designed for Sa...
2. $6.99
Supershieldz (2 Pack) Design...
3. $9.99
amFilm Auto-Alignment OneTou...
List Price: 479€		198 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"
2340x1080
385 PPI
Super AMOLED
6.
82.2%
Xiaomi Poco F6
Xiaomi Poco F6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 735 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 		Amazon: $356.06
List Price: 500€		179 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"
2712x1220
446 PPI
AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 小米 Poco F7 智能手机评测：讨价还价的潜在热门
Manuel Masiero, 2025-08-22 (Update: 2025-08-22)