关于小米Redmi Note 15 4G 的评价
小米Redmi Note 15 LTE 与前代产品相比有了改进：例如，由于电池容量更大，电池续航时间大大延长。或者是官方支持 HDR 的屏幕，亮度更高，触摸屏采样率大大加快。
此外，4G 频率的种类也有所增加，因此Redmi Note 15 在旅行时可以更加灵活地使用。
虽然处理器有了新名字，但它只是一个略有改动的 SoC。与前代产品相比，它在性能上没有任何优势，但就其价格而言，整体表现不错。
有些用户可能会对取消 3.5 毫米音频接口感到不满。屏幕玻璃延伸到边缘的设计也可能不会吸引所有买家。
由于电池续航时间长、性能合适、屏幕明亮，小米Redmi Note 15 LTE 是一款配置非常出色的中端手机。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
小米Redmi Note 15 4G 的最小存储版本也在网上有售，价格不到 200 欧元。
我们的测试机配备 8GB 内存和 256GB 大容量存储空间，在测试时通常只需支付 220 欧元（约合 235 美元），例如在亚马逊（amazon.de）。
- $7.99Anoowkoa 2 Pack for Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+/Note 15 Pro Plus 5G/Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 3D Screen protector with Camera Lens protector Tempered Glass.9H Hardness.Anti-Fingerprint.No Air-Bubbles.Easy Installation
- $191.50Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 4G LTE (for Tmobile Mint Tello Global) (256GB + 8GB) 6.67" 120Hz 108MP AI Camera Global Version Dual Sim (Midnight Black)
- $7.99Natbok 2+2 Pack for Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Screen Protector with Camera Lens Protector,9H Tempered Glass Film,HD Clear Scratch Resistant,Bubble-Free for Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Screen Protector
规格
外壳和功能 - 不再有音频插孔
与上一代产品相比，其设计发生了变化。 小米Redmi Note 14前代产品的外观棱角分明，而现在则以圆角为主。我们的测试设备也比上一代产品略窄、略轻。
磨砂背面有黑色、浅蓝色和浅绿色可选，光滑的表面下有轻微的波浪纹。外壳非常坚固，没有任何吱吱作响或扭曲。手机的防护等级为 IP64，这意味着它可以防尘和防水溅。
有三种内存配置可供选择：
- 6GB内存/128GB大容量存储 - 199欧元
- 8 GB 内存 / 128 GB 大容量存储 - 229 欧元
- 8 GB 内存 / 256 GB 大容量存储 - 249 欧元
可使用 microSD 读卡器增加存储空间。在我们使用 Angelbird V60 参考卡进行的测试中，读卡器的速度被证明一般。
Redmi Note 15 4G 的前代产品仍有一个专用的 3.5 毫米音频接口，但现在已经取消了。不过，红外线端口和 NFC 仍然存在。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A17 4G | |
| Motorola Moto G56 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (5.72 - 58.9, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| CMF Phone 2 Pro (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
跨平台磁盘测试 (CPDT)
通信与操作 - 电话更加国际化
红米系列的入门机型没有 5G。相反，它支持多种 4G 频率，因此使用小米Redmi Note 15 4G 可以实现国际旅行。
在我们的随机测试中，即使在困难的情况下，接收质量也基本可靠。
WiFi 5 是红米手机上最快的 WiFi 标准。在我们的测试中，数据传输速率达到了通常的 250 至 350 MBit/s。
触摸屏现在对所需触摸的响应速度更快，再加上 120 Hz 显示屏的快速帧速率，使得操作非常流畅。由于 SoC 的速度不是很快，偶尔会出现卡顿现象。
| Networking | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A17 4G | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Motorola Moto G56 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| CMF Phone 2 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
软件和可持续性 - 六年更新
Android 小米手机预装了 HyperOS 15 操作界面，可极大地定制和扩展系统。
制造商保证 6 年的安全更新，即直到 2032 年初。
小米仍然使用塑料薄膜作为包装，否则人们对该产品的可持续性知之甚少。
相机 - 照片合格
Redmi Note 15 4G 配备了一个 1.08 亿像素的摄像头和一个用于模糊效果的小型辅助传感器。
主摄像头拍摄的照片效果不错，不过对比度可以再高一些，细节清晰度还有待提高，偶尔也会使非常明亮的区域过度曝光。在弱光和高对比度环境下，照片效果也还可以接受。
前置摄像头的自拍动态效果不错，但在细节方面往往有些过于粗糙。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow Light
显示屏 - 需要时极为明亮
小米对屏幕进行了改进：即使在这个价位，AMOLED 屏幕也不再罕见；不过，正式支持 HDR 和接近 3,000 cd/m² 的屏幕是以前昂贵得多的智能手机所独有的功能。
在低亮度条件下，PWM 闪烁频率与帧频相近是意料之中的。小米表示，如果需要，也可以达到 3,840 Hz。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1161 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 3 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.77}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
99% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.298
CCT: 6068 K
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 AMOLED, 2392x1080, 6.8" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy A17 4G AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7" | Motorola Moto G56 IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7" | CMF Phone 2 Pro AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.8" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 31% | -17% | -17% | 26% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1161 | 1164 0% | 687 -41% | 853 -27% | 1280 10% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1144 | 1169 2% | 666 -42% | 793 -31% | 1277 12% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 97 | 99 2% | 93 -4% | 89 -8% | 97 0% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.54 | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3 | 1.3 57% | 3.45 -15% | 4.21 -40% | 1.3 57% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.09 | 2.5 65% | 5.49 23% | 6.69 6% | 3.9 45% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3 | 1.3 57% | 3.6 -20% | 3 -0% | 2 33% |
| Gamma | 2.298 96% | 2.22 99% | 2.026 109% | 2.175 101% | 2.14 103% |
| CCT | 6068 107% | 6531 100% | 6192 105% | 6750 96% | 6776 96% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1580 |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE | |
| CMF Phone 2 Pro | |
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE | |
| CMF Phone 2 Pro | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 119 Hz Amplitude: 16 % |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 119 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 119 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8077 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）
在 "原色专业 "模式下，色彩显示相当准确，只是在某些蓝色和红色色调上略有偏差。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.6 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池续航时间 - 可轻松续航两天
联发科 联发科技 Helio G100联发科 Helio G100 的 SoC 与前代产品 Helio G99 相同，只是略有改进。性能方面没有任何变化，数值非常接近。在菜单中也可能出现卡顿现象，但通常只发生在要求较高的任务中。
机壳上的热量积聚仍然适中，3DMark 压力测试也显示长时间负载后性能几乎没有下降。
手机将听筒用作第二个扬声器，因此可以产生轻微的立体声效果。扬声器的最大音量一般，低音和中低音很弱。这导致高音偏重，大音量时也会令人不悦。
Redmi Note 15 的最大充电功率为 33 瓦。有线反向充电也可达到 18 瓦。
6,000 毫安时的大容量电池可实现较长的运行时间：在我们的 WLAN 测试中，该机型的运行时间接近 20 小时。这意味着在不充电的情况下连续运行两天不成问题。
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE | Samsung Galaxy A17 4G | Motorola Moto G56 | CMF Phone 2 Pro | Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -1% | -58% | 6% | 22% | 1% | 91% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 985.2 | 980.55 0% | 518.6 -47% | 1013.35 3% | 986.43 0% | 904 ? -8% | 2242 ? 128% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 832.1 | 835.49 0% | 172.6 -79% | 859.11 3% | 524.58 -37% | 729 ? -12% | 1881 ? 126% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 218.5 | 202.22 -7% | 141.1 -35% | 230.68 6% | 294.62 35% | 226 ? 3% | 299 ? 37% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 202.3 | 213.23 5% | 55.9 -72% | 226.19 12% | 385.68 91% | 247 ? 22% | 345 ? 71% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE | |
| Samsung Galaxy A17 4G | |
| CMF Phone 2 Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G56 | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A17 4G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE | |
| Motorola Moto G56 | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE | |
| Motorola Moto G56 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 6000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE 5500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A17 4G 5000 mAh | Motorola Moto G56 5200 mAh | CMF Phone 2 Pro 5000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 19.7 | 17.6 -11% | 13 -34% | 18.5 -6% | 18.3 -7% |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
小米Redmi Note 15 4G 在某些情况下价格不到 200 欧元。它的速度不是特别快，但提供的功能很多，续航时间也很长。
今年，廉价的中档手机将不得不在功能方面与之竞争。
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15
- 01/18/2026 v8
Florian Schmitt
Total Sustainability Score: 可比较的替代品
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 73.8%  | Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Mediatek Helio G100 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $7.99 Anoowkoa 2 Pack for Xiaomi R... 2. $191.50 Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 4G LTE ... 3. $7.99 Natbok 2+2 Pack for Xiaomi R... List Price: 249€ | 184 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.77" 2392x1080 388 PPI AMOLED |
2. 73.4%  | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $191.50 Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 4G LTE ... 2. $189.00 XIAOMI Redmi Note 14 4G LTE ... 3. $299.99 XIAOMI Redmi Note 14 5G + LT... List Price: 250€ | 196 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" 2400x1080 395 PPI AMOLED |
3. 72%  | Samsung Galaxy A17 4G Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 128 GB eMMC | Amazon: $204.99 List Price: 185€ | 190 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.70" 2340x1080 385 PPI AMOLED |
4. 74.9%  | Motorola Moto G56 MediaTek Dimensity 7060 ⎘ IMG BXM-8-256 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $10.79 Ibywind For Motorola Moto G5... 2. $8.90 USTIYA Case for Motorola Mot... 3. $2.99 Anoowkoa 3 Pack Designed for... List Price: 250 Euro | 200 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.72" 2400x1080 391 PPI IPS |
5. 76.9%  | CMF Phone 2 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $11.99 Ibywind For Nothing CMF Phon... 2. $79.00 CMF Watch Pro 2 Smartwatch f... 3. $59.00 CMF Buds Pro 2 Wireless Earb... List Price: 279€ | 185 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.77" 2400x1080 389 PPI AMOLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
