Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser
ⓘ Daniel Schmidt

Redmi Note 15 5G 能否赢得所有人的青睐?

低廉的价格,可靠的承诺。

Redmi Note 15 5G 在显示质量、电池续航时间和更新支持方面取得了有意义的进步,同时小米将该系列从联发科处理器过渡到了高通处理器。这些调整是否能带来真正引人注目的产品,是我们这次评测的核心问题。
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Redmi Note 15 5G 评论

Redmi Note 15 5G 是经济实惠的中端产品中综合实力较强的一款。它拥有极亮的 120 Hz AMOLED 显示屏、非常出色的电池续航时间、坚固的 IP65 级外壳以及高达Android 19 的长期更新承诺,这一切都使它既适合日常使用,又相对面向未来。与此同时,摄像头、扬声器、连接限制(如 eSIM 和 Vo5G 的缺失)以及重广告的软件显然与理想相去甚远。因此,这款手机更像是一款理性的长跑运动员,而不是真正的多媒体推荐产品。

与几乎完全相同的 Poco M8 5G 相比,红米手机以其更多功能的相机配置证明了其更高的价格。优先考虑显示质量、电池续航时间和长期软件支持的用户会在这里找到更强的选择,而对照片、视频和音频要求较高的用户可能会更喜欢三星Galaxy A 系列或 Nothing 等竞争对手的机型。

Pros

+ 显示屏非常明亮准确
+ 电池寿命长
+ 支持 microSD
+ 耐用设计

Cons

- 仅虚拟接近传感器
- 不支持 eSIM
- 仅支持 ac WiFi
- 性能储备有限
- ERM 振动电机
- 不支持 HDR

价格和供应情况

Redmi Note 15 5G 6 GB 和 128 GB 机型的零售价为 280 欧元,8 GB 和 256 GB 机型的零售价为 300 欧元。它通过小米在线商店直接销售。

零售价更低。在测试时,128 GB 机型在CoolblueGalaxus 的售价为 219 欧元,而 256 GB 机型在AlternateGalaxus 的售价分别为 269 欧元。

定价、供货情况和网络功能可能因地区而异。以上信息针对欧洲市场,可能不适用于北美等其他地区。

小米Redmi Note 15 5G 继承了去年的 Redmi Note 14 5G并在几个关键领域进行了改进,包括峰值显示亮度、电池容量、视频功能和 IP 防护等级。

其兄弟机型 Poco M8 5G乍一看几乎一模一样。不过,红米变体采用了改进的摄像头设置,使其略有不同。

这两款手机中哪一款最终会被证明是更好的选择,以及它能否对三星的领跑者构成真正的挑战,仍然是一个关键问题。

规格:小米Redmi Note 15 5G

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G (Redmi Note 15 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 8c/8t, 4 x 2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A78, 4 x 1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55, Cortex-A78 / A55
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 710
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
6.77 inch 19:9:9, 2392 x 1080 pixel 388 PPI, capacitve touchscreen, 10 multi touch points, AMOLED, Touch sampling rate: 240 Hz, 3840 Hz PWM-dimming, Wet Touch 2.0, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB 
, 225.2 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Virtual proximity, Accelerometer, Electronic compass, Gyroscope, OTG, IR-Blaster
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.35 x 164 x 75.42
Battery
5520 mAh Lithium-Ion, Silicon-Carbon-Anode, 18 W Reverse Charging, Battery Cycles: 1000
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix (Samsung HM9, 1/1.67", 1.92 µm, f/1.7, 24 mm, OIS) + 8 MPix (OmniVision OV08F10, Ultra Wide, f/2.2, 16 mm); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix (OmniVision OV20B40, 1/4", f/2.2, 21 / 26 mm)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Silicone protective cover, USB-Cabel, SIM-Tool, HyperOS 2.0, 12 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LHDC V5, LDAC | GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1I, B1C), Galileo (E1) | HDR: not supported | DRM Widevine L1 | Hybrid-SIM | Dolby Atmos | IP65 | USB Copy Test: 28.09 MB/s (connected to Samsung Portable SSD T7 (USB 3.2 Gen. 2), Supported File Systems for external storages: FAT32, exFAT, NTFS | Body-SAR: 0.987 W/kg, Head-SAR: 0.997 W/kg | max. charging speed: 45 W (wired), fanless
Weight
178 g
Price
300 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳:结构坚固,可延长智能手机的使用寿命

Redmi Note 15 5G 有黑色和冰川蓝两种颜色。与前代产品的 7.99 毫米相比,新机型更加纤薄,仅为标称的 7.35 毫米。我们自己测量的结果是 7.4 毫米,摄像头模块的最高点为 10.75 毫米。由于机身侧面采用了柔和的弧形设计,小米手机给人的感觉比实际要窄,拿在手上非常舒适。

正面由不明高强度玻璃保护,边框和背面则由塑料制成。小米手机打着 "Titan Tough"(泰坦坚韧)的旗号,称其特别耐用。这不仅体现在其 IP65 防护等级上,还体现在其宣称的抗摔性上。根据制造商的说法,它可以经受从 1.7 米高处跌落到大理石表面而不受损害。此外,它还能抵御零下 40 摄氏度到零上 70 摄氏度的极端温度,并据称具有更好的抗刮擦性能。在我们评测期间进行的几次腰部高度跌落测试中,Redmi Note 15 5G 完全毫发无损。

制造质量总体良好。虽然仔细观察会发现背板并不总是与边框完全齐平,但大部分缝隙都很均匀。智能手机在尝试扭转时感觉很坚固,不过会产生明显的吱吱声。

尺寸比较

163.52 mm 77.5 mm 8.35 mm 201 g164 mm 75.42 mm 7.35 mm 178 g164 mm 75.42 mm 7.35 mm 178 g162.4 mm 75.7 mm 7.99 mm 190 g162.9 mm 78.2 mm 7.4 mm 195 g161.2 mm 74.7 mm 8.7 mm 198 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

功能 Redmi Note 15 5G 提供两种存储类型

来自小米的Redmi Note 15 5G 有 6 GB 内存和 128 GB 内置存储两种版本,也有 8 GB 和 256 GB 两种版本。两个版本都支持通过 microSD 卡扩展存储空间。此外,还配备了 NFC 和红外触发器。

Redmi Note 14 5G不同的是,当前机型不再提供耳机插孔。卡托是一个混合插槽,这意味着它既可以容纳两张 nano SIM 卡,也可以容纳一张 nano SIM 卡和一张 microSD 卡。不支持 eSIM 卡。

顶部边缘:麦克风、红外热像仪、扬声器
ⓘ Daniel Schmidt
顶部边缘:麦克风、红外热像仪、扬声器
右侧:音量、电源按钮
ⓘ Daniel Schmidt
右侧:音量、电源按钮
底部边缘:扬声器、USB 端口、麦克风、混合 SIM 卡插槽
ⓘ Daniel Schmidt
底部边缘:扬声器、USB 端口、麦克风、混合 SIM 卡插槽

microSD 读卡器

Redmi Note 15 5G 的 microSD 卡插槽在复制测试中的传输速率只能算中等。不过,在跨平台磁盘测试中的性能却很稳定,尤其是在读取数据时。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Motorola Moto G86 Power
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (Angelbird V60)
46.2 MB/s +64%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.72 - 58.9, n=72, last 2 years)
32.4 MB/s +15%
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
32.31 MB/s +15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
30.1 MB/s +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
28.09 MB/s

跨平台磁盘测试 (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø37.3 (27.7-48.8)
Motorola Moto G86 Power Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø33.7 (18-45.6)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø70.8 (41.2-81.2)
Motorola Moto G86 Power Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø71 (43.5-78.6)

软件:Redmi Note 15 5G 将接受更新,更新至Android 19

Redmi Note 15 5G 预装了谷歌Android 15 和小米 HyperOS 2.0。根据制造商提供的信息,该手机计划接收的版本升级最高可达Android 19,同时还将接收为期六年的安全补丁,一直持续到 2032 年 1 月。

红米手机支持小米互联等功能,但不包括 HyperAI。图库应用确实提供了一些人工智能工具,包括物体移除和天空替换。

与前几代产品一样,小米手机预装了许多第三方应用程序,不过这些应用程序可以卸载。与更昂贵的机型相比,集成到系统中的广告更为突出。 小米网站上的一篇文章介绍了用户如何删除或限制这些广告。

可持续性

小米没有提供有关Redmi Note 15 5G 可持续发展方面的具体信息。智能手机装在纸箱中,但用塑料套密封。

首批更换部件已在小米网站上列出,用户可以购买。预计维修指南也将很快推出。

通信和全球导航卫星系统:Redmi Note 15 5G,带单频全球导航卫星系统和交流 WiFi

在连接功能方面,Redmi Note 15 5G 仅提供基本功能:交流 WiFi、NFC、蓝牙 5.1 和频段覆盖良好的 5G。

移动网络和 WiFi 的接收质量都不错。与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT AXE11000 的传输速度不是特别高,但在整个测试过程中保持稳定。

Networking
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
369 (min: 188) MBit/s ∼39%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
354 (min: 343) MBit/s ∼43%
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
369 (min: 184) MBit/s ∼39%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
353 (min: 309) MBit/s ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
860 (min: 440) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
752 (min: 713) MBit/s ∼90%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
373 (min: 183) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
351 (min: 340) MBit/s ∼42%
Nothing Phone (3a)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
938 (min: 466) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
831 (min: 777) MBit/s ∼100%
Motorola Moto G86 Power
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
350 (min: 276) MBit/s ∼37%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
395 (min: 378) MBit/s ∼48%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
338 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼36%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
330 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼40%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
685 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
720 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼87%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø362 (188-383)
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø845 (440-918)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø353 (343-358)
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø750 (713-779)
GPS 测试:建筑物内
建筑物内
GPS 测试:户外
户外活动

只有四个卫星系统的单波段全球导航卫星系统可用于定位。即便如此,在室外也能快速、准确地实现卫星定位。

在一次骑车过程中,我们将小米智能手机与 Garmin 健身智能手表进行了比较。记录的路线基本准确,但也能看到与实际路径的一些偏差。

全球导航卫星系统试车:环湖航行
全球导航卫星系统试车:环湖航行
全球导航卫星系统试驾:城市
全球导航卫星系统试驾:城市
全球导航卫星系统试运行:总结
全球导航卫星系统试运行:总结

电话和通话质量

Redmi Note 15 5G 配备了混合 SIM 卡插槽,可以使用两张 SIM 卡,但前提是必须省略 microSD 卡。遗憾的是,它不支持 eSIM 卡。支持 WiFi 通话和 VoLTE,但不支持 Vo5G。

将手机放在耳边时,通话质量还算不错,但对环境噪声的过滤不足。扬声器可以在安静的环境中舒适地使用,但其麦克风范围有限,而且会有轻微的回音。

不支持通过小米服务进行离线通信。虚拟接近传感器在日常使用中运行可靠,而其他机型并非总是如此。

摄像头:设置稳固,灵活性有限

与Redmi Note 15 5G 自拍
与Redmi Note 15 5G 自拍

前置摄像头像素很高,但不支持像素二进制。虽然动态范围较窄,而且在弱光环境下会出现明显的噪点,但它能拍摄出相当吸引人的图像。视频录制仅限于每秒 30 帧的全高清格式。

后置主摄像头采用了 1.08 亿像素的传感器,并提供光学防抖功能。图像锐化程度相当高,减少了细节,但色彩平衡总体上控制得很好。明亮区域容易曝光过度。

与 Poco M8 上的深度传感器相比,额外的超广角摄像头无疑是更好的选择,但图像质量仍然难以令人信服。细节不够清晰,景深较浅。

变焦完全采用数字技术,放大倍率可达 20 倍。变焦到三倍左右时,效果还可以接受。超过这个倍率,图像区域会分裂成可见的像素群,OIS 也会达到极限。

主摄像头可进行 720p、1080p 或超高清视频录制,但只能达到每秒 30 帧。

超广角
超广角
24 毫米(光学)
24 毫米(光学)
120 毫米
120 毫米
240 毫米
240 毫米
480 毫米(最大值)
480 毫米(最大值)

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light

在可控的照明条件下,测试图即使是边缘也能保持相当清晰,但细微之处,包括图像中央,则显得模糊不清。

色彩还原总体良好,但饱和色调的呈现略显过度。

ColorChecker
8.5 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
8 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
5 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
6 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G: 6.7 ∆E min: 1.91 - max: 10.45 ∆E
ColorChecker
30 ∆E
55.3 ∆E
40.4 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
46.1 ∆E
62.8 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
66.1 ∆E
64.5 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
38.2 ∆E
77.1 ∆E
44.5 ∆E
44.9 ∆E
94.3 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.9 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G: 47.66 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 94.33 ∆E

配件和保修:Redmi Note 15 5G,可选小米贴心服务

Redmi Note 15 5G 随附一条 USB 数据线(Type A 转 Type C)、一个 SIM 卡工具和一个黑色硅胶保护套。兼容的 45 瓦电源适配器可从Xiaomi 单独购买。.

该智能手机享有 12 个月的全球制造商保修服务。这不影响任何 法定保修义务零售商提供的任何法定保修义务。小米 Care 也适用于 Note 15,两年的保修价格为 39 欧元,如果包含防盗保护,则为 59 欧元。

输入设备和操作:小米手机中的光学指纹传感器

电容式触摸屏配有预贴屏幕保护膜,具有良好的滑动性能,整个表面都能可靠地检测到输入。

显示屏上集成了光学指纹传感器。它能快速解锁Redmi Note 15 5G,并提供可靠的识别率。通过前置摄像头进行面部识别的安全性较低,但在日光下也能快速识别。

ERM 振动电机可分三级调节。它功能强大,声音清晰,但反馈感觉有些柔和。支持各种手势控制以简化操作,还提供单手模式。

显示屏:极高亮度的护眼面板

子像素结构
子像素结构

Redmi Note 15 5G 的 6.77 英寸 AMOLED 显示屏支持最高 120 Hz 的刷新率,系统可自动将刷新率降至最低 60 Hz。不支持 HDR。

我们的亮度测量结果表明,在分析缩小的白色区域时,面板亮度水平非常高。在全屏白色模式下,亮度接近平均水平。手动调节时,显示屏亮度可达 599 cd/m²。设置中的阳光模式不会进一步提高这一数值。

显示屏采用高达 3,840 Hz 的高频 PWM 调光,这应该会让对闪烁敏感的用户感觉更舒适。不过,我们也记录到 60 Hz 的频率相对较低,这可能是由于 BFI 的缘故。

993
cd/m²
974
cd/m²
958
cd/m²
990
cd/m²
979
cd/m²
965
cd/m²
966
cd/m²
958
cd/m²
940
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 993 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 969.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2.17 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 979 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.3 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.76}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.6 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
95.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
CCT: 6688 K
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
AMOLED, 2392x1080, 6.8"
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G
AMOLED, 2392x1080, 6.8"
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Nothing Phone (3a)
AMOLED, 2392x1080, 6.8"
Motorola Moto G86 Power
OLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Screen
6%
-7%
-12%
-55%
4%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
979
953
-3%
1127
15%
1147
17%
1287
31%
1429
46%
Brightness (cd/m²)
969
954
-2%
1137
17%
1146
18%
1274
31%
1357
40%
Brightness Distribution (%)
95
95
0%
98
3%
96
1%
97
2%
91
-4%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.3
1
23%
1.8
-38%
1.6
-23%
1.9
-46%
1.4
-8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.6
2.3
12%
2.8
-8%
3.7
-42%
8.7
-235%
3.21
-23%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.6
1.5
6%
2.1
-31%
2.3
-44%
3.4
-113%
2
-25%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.22 99%
2.11 104%
2.27 97%
2.26 97%
2.251 98%
CCT
6688 97%
6694 97%
6466 101%
6368 102%
7072 92%
6364 102%

* ... smaller is better

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3430 cd/m²
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1877 cd/m² -45%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1202 cd/m² -65%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1138 cd/m² -67%

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 60 Hz
Amplitude: 13.61 %
Secondary Frequency: 3333 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8002 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图)

使用 Calman 进行的显示分析证实,当选择标准配色方案时,Redmi Note 15 5G 的显示效果非常准确。否则,图像会略微偏冷。

灰度(配色方案:标准,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(配色方案:标准,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(配色方案:标准,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(配色方案:标准,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(配色方案:标准,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(配色方案:标准,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配色方案:标准,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配色方案:标准,色温:标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5435 ms rise
↘ 0.5845 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.99 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.43 ms rise
↘ 0.5615 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.4 ms).

在室外,红米智能手机给人留下了良好的印象,在大多数光线条件下都能轻松阅读。只有玻璃上的反光会让人分心。

即使在视角较浅的情况下,Redmi Note 15 5G 也能始终保持清晰易读。只是从侧面看,图像略显暗淡和冷色。

Redmi Note 15 5G 的视角稳定性
ⓘ Daniel Schmidt
Redmi Note 15 5G 的视角稳定性

性能:由于采用了更老的 Snapdragon 处理器,速度更快

虽然 Redmi Note 14 5G仍然依赖于 联发科 Dimensity 7025而 Note 15 5G 则使用 高通骁龙 6 代 32024,搭配 8GB LPDDR4x 内存。这样的改变是有回报的,因为目前的机型在 CPU 任务和整体系统响应速度方面都能提供明显更高的性能。

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3883, n=210, last 2 years)
1733 Points +70%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
1171 Points +15%
Motorola Moto G86 Power
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
1053 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
1033 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
1024 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
1017 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (999 - 1033, n=5)
1017 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
947 Points -7%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 11634, n=210, last 2 years)
5097 Points +72%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
3250 Points +10%
Motorola Moto G86 Power
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
2972 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
2963 Points
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
2960 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
2955 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (2887 - 2963, n=5)
2942 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
2302 Points -22%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3269237, n=136, last 2 years)
1483423 Points
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
795329 Points
Motorola Moto G86 Power
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
672532 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (617456 - 658230, n=3)
632066 Points
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
617456 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
469182 Points
Antutu v11 - Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (584158 - 4273120, n=19, last 2 years)
2444440 Points +185%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (857561 - 885038, n=2)
871300 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
857561 Points
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
15606 Points +40%
Motorola Moto G86 Power
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
15552 Points +40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 28557, n=182, last 2 years)
14845 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
12811 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (10086 - 13807, n=4)
11959 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
11131 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
10629 Points -5%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2856, n=116, last 2 years)
1144 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
877 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
842 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (737 - 877, n=4)
813 Points -3%
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
796 Points -5%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
785 Points -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
585 Points -31%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 16690, n=146, last 2 years)
7668 Points +54%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
5543 Points +12%
Motorola Moto G86 Power
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
5002 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
4970 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (4532 - 5056, n=4)
4776 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
4532 Points -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
3678 Points -26%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 21153, n=146, last 2 years)
11434 Points +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (8445 - 9674, n=4)
9025 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G86 Power
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
8999 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
8974 Points
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
8672 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
8445 Points -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
7104 Points -21%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 24052, n=146, last 2 years)
8756 Points +43%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
7675 Points +26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
6102 Points
Motorola Moto G86 Power
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
6055 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (4554 - 6102, n=4)
5291 Points -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
4735 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
4632 Points -24%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1046 - 384996, n=146, last 2 years)
25938 Points +247%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
8951 Points +20%
Motorola Moto G86 Power
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
8638 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
8011 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (7298 - 8011, n=4)
7586 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
7474 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
4058 Points -46%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 2587, n=146, last 2 years)
1699 Points +14%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
1585 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
1490 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (1425 - 1498, n=4)
1466 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
1452 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G86 Power
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
1444 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
1341 Points -10%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Motorola Moto G86 Power
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
27122 Points +212%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3769 - 81594, n=130, last 2 years)
18949 Points +118%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (8253 - 9416, n=4)
8911 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
8697 Points
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
8626 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
8253 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
5946 Points -32%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=109, last 2 years)
20788 Points +3353%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
1019 Points +69%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
719 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (587 - 729, n=3)
639 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
602 Points
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
587 Points -2%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5210, n=80, last 2 years)
683 Points +399%
Motorola Moto G86 Power
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
552 Points +303%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
137 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (123 - 138, n=3)
132.7 Points -3%
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
123 Points -10%
Half Precision NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 36297, n=80, last 2 years)
2667 Points +1833%
Motorola Moto G86 Power
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
1375 Points +896%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
138 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (123 - 141, n=3)
134 Points -3%
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
123 Points -11%
Quantized NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone
  (133 - 49889, n=80, last 2 years)
3951 Points +908%
Motorola Moto G86 Power
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
2654 Points +577%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
392 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (351 - 398, n=3)
380 Points -3%
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
351 Points -10%
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.4 - 3334, n=39, last 2 years)
645 Points
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
100 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
67.3 Points
Score V6
Average of class Smartphone
  (55.6 - 22780, n=84, last 2 years)
5362 Points +1278%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
1388 Points +257%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
389 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (299 - 389, n=2)
344 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
299 Points -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
212 Points -46%

集成的 Adreno 710负责图形计算,与去年的机型相比,性能同样有明显提升。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1063 Points +24%
Motorola Moto G86 Power
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
902 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
901 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
854 Points
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
852 Points 0%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1057 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
907 Points +5%
Motorola Moto G86 Power
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
866 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
864 Points
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
863 Points 0%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4186 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3502 Points +7%
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3288 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3283 Points
Motorola Moto G86 Power
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3128 Points -5%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
381 Points +25%
Motorola Moto G86 Power
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
347 Points +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
304 Points
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
303 Points 0%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
382 Points +25%
Motorola Moto G86 Power
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
348 Points +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
306 Points
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
305 Points 0%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
108 fps +80%
Motorola Moto G86 Power
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
84 fps +40%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
57 fps -5%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
130 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
126 fps +4%
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
122 fps +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
121 fps
Motorola Moto G86 Power
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
115 fps -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
72 fps -40%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps +14%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +5%
Motorola Moto G86 Power
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
57 fps
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
57 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps -18%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
85 fps +16%
Motorola Moto G86 Power
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
82 fps +12%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 fps +4%
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
74 fps +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
73 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
62 fps -15%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
55 fps +15%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
48 fps
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps -2%
Motorola Moto G86 Power
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
36 fps -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -40%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps +15%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps +4%
Motorola Moto G86 Power
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
54 fps
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
54 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps -37%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps +16%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
26 fps +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G86 Power
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps -40%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps +17%
Motorola Moto G86 Power
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps +14%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -41%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps +33%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G86 Power
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10 fps -52%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps +33%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G86 Power
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.7 fps -55%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps +48%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps +26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G86 Power
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps -42%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps +24%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G86 Power
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
38 fps -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps -52%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8.8 fps +33%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7.1 fps +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.6 fps
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.6 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G86 Power
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.1 fps -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.8 fps -58%

在日常使用中,Redmi Note 15 5G 提供了稳定的浏览性能,我们从未感觉到它的局限性。不过,许多竞争设备的速度明显更快。

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135)
161.602 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone (23.8 - 358, n=143, last 2 years)
151.9 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G (Chrome 145)
147.778 Points
Motorola Moto G86 Power (Chrome 140)
138.526 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)
131.654 Points -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (117 - 147.8, n=4)
130.7 Points -12%
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G (Chrome 144.0.7559.132)
116.992 Points -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
111.073 Points -25%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 643, n=113, last 2 years)
223 runs/min +58%
Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135)
176 runs/min +25%
Motorola Moto G86 Power (Chrome 140)
143 runs/min +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G (Chrome 145)
141 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (105 - 141, n=3)
117 runs/min -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
107 runs/min -24%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)
105 runs/min -26%
Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 42.8, n=123, last 2 years)
14.1 runs/min +51%
Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135)
11.2 runs/min +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G (Chrome 145)
9.32 runs/min
Motorola Moto G86 Power (Chrome 140)
8.86 runs/min -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (6.94 - 9.32, n=3)
7.74 runs/min -17%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)
6.94 runs/min -26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
6.79 runs/min -27%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135)
149 Points +31%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 306, n=137, last 2 years)
143.2 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)
127 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (107 - 140, n=4)
122 Points +7%
Motorola Moto G86 Power (Chrome 140)
120 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G (Chrome 145)
114 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
112 Points -2%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 126661, n=188, last 2 years)
48100 Points +19%
Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135)
45346 Points +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G (Chrome 145)
40500 Points
Motorola Moto G86 Power (Chrome 140)
39856 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (37483 - 40500, n=4)
38487 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)
38099 Points -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
36371 Points -10%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=149, last 2 years)
1172 ms * -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (978 - 1476, n=4)
1141 ms * -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
1130.9 ms * -16%
Motorola Moto G86 Power (Chrome 140)
1099.5 ms * -12%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)
1031.23 ms * -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G (Chrome 145)
978.2 ms *
Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135)
862.4 ms * +12%

* ... smaller is better

UFS 2.2 存储器原则上应能实现较高的数据传输速率,但 SoC 似乎是限制因素。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5GXiaomi Poco M8 5GSamsung Galaxy A36 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GNothing Phone (3a)Motorola Moto G86 PowerAverage 256 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-5%
-37%
-2%
8%
-4%
-8%
73%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)
911.87
1042.73
14%
968.34
6%
950.62
4%
1031.34
13%
982.2
8%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)
867.34
893.75
3%
166.77
-81%
792.56
-9%
1001.28
15%
701.2
-19%
739 ?(369 - 998, n=61)
-15%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)
222.77
146.5
-34%
233.98
5%
257.91
16%
245.48
10%
218.4
-2%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)
302.72
294.99
-3%
62.58
-79%
245.16
-19%
285.24
-6%
289.9
-4%

游戏:忙碌时最好不要玩

骁龙 660 Adreno 710为游戏设置了明确的限制。休闲游戏没有问题,但要求更高的游戏可能会出现卡顿或需要降低细节设置。

PUBG Mobile》就是一个很好的例子,我们使用GameBench 对其进行了分析。.该游戏可在超高清预设值下运行,但由于没有光线追踪等功能,因此视觉效果仍达不到最高水平。

暗黑破坏神不朽
暗黑破坏神不朽
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 4.2.0: Ø52.4 (25-61)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø52 (27-60)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.7 (30-42)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G; Diablo Immortal: Ø58.3 (39-61)

排放:性能稳定的红米智能手机

温度

尽管小米Redmi Note 15 5G 没有使用高端 SoC,但设备表面某些区域的温度明显升高,最高可达 44 摄氏度。这在日常使用中还是不成问题的。

在 3DMark 压力测试中,SoC 从未出现明显的节流现象,性能始终保持稳定。

Max. Load
 44 °C42.8 °C37.6 °C 
 43.6 °C43.1 °C37.2 °C 
 42.3 °C41.3 °C37.2 °C 
Maximum: 44 °C
Average: 41 °C
37.7 °C40.3 °C40.8 °C
35.9 °C40.1 °C40.3 °C
33.9 °C37.2 °C39.4 °C
Maximum: 40.8 °C
Average: 38.4 °C
Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.7 %
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.6 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.4 % 0%
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99 % -1%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.8 % 0%
Motorola Moto G86 Power
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.7 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 %
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.2 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 % -1%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.3 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.1 %
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.1 % 0%
05101520Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø5.2 (5.19-5.22)
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.42 (5.38-5.44)
Nothing Phone (3a) Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø6.28 (6.27-6.29)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø19.6 (19.6-19.7)
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø20.7 (20.6-20.8)
Nothing Phone (3a) Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø23.8 (23.8-23.9)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø2.27 (2.26-2.28)
Nothing Phone (3a) Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø2.81 (2.8-2.81)

发言人

Redmi Note 15 5G 的双扬声器被宣传为支持杜比全景声(Dolby Atmos),但在测试中的表现并不特别令人信服。声音缺乏深度和体感,显得不平衡。对于通话和偶尔的短时间媒体播放来说,它已经足够了,但仅此而已。

通过 USB-C 或蓝牙输出的音频明显要好一些。蓝牙也提供了广泛的编解码器支持,但不支持 Auracast。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.632.42526.225.83120.2284034.3305039.239.4632425.3801424.110013.723.212514.426.61601844.220014.54725014.753.231513.255.540012.350.950010.955.263011.558.680011.365.6100011.470.3125011.680160011.679.8200011.779.9250012.179315012.379.8400012.772.7500013.170.1630013.175.580001370.81000013.175.31250013.174160001362SPL24.588.7N0.669median 13median 70.1Delta1.311.337.839.528.134.724.429.720.53029.53518.930.917.734.815.836.213.439.613.953.611.251.910.453.711.759.110.163.28.865.88.965.49.271.79.876.610.378.510.879.611.880.211.380.212811381.912.677.512.877.412.975.513.375.413.559.513.656.523.890.50.582.1median 11.8median 75.41.510.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 15 5GSamsung Galaxy A36 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 10% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A36 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池寿命:Redmi Note 15 5G 内含 5520 毫安时电池

耗电量

Redmi Note 15 5G 的功耗令人印象深刻,在我们的控制亮度测试中,它的性能甚至超过了 三星Galaxy A36.

这款智能手机通过线缆充电的功率高达 45 瓦,但不支持无线充电。充满电仅需相对较短的 58 分钟,24 分钟后达到 50%,42 分钟后达到 80%。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.05 / 0.21 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.04 / 1.33 / 1.38 Watt
Load midlight 4.05 / 8.98 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
5520 mAh
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G
5520 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
5110 mAh
Nothing Phone (3a)
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G86 Power
6720 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
6%
-20%
-5%
4%
-26%
-7%
-19%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)
1.04
1
4%
0.86
17%
1.15
-11%
0.93
11%
1.3
-25%
0.91 ?(0.8 - 1.04, n=5)
12%
Idle Average * (Watt)
1.33
1.24
7%
1.75
-32%
1.55
-17%
1.67
-26%
1.6
-20%
1.306 ?(1.1 - 1.75, n=5)
2%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)
1.38
1.27
8%
1.82
-32%
1.57
-14%
1.68
-22%
2.4
-74%
1.428 ?(1.17 - 1.82, n=5)
-3%
Load Average * (Watt)
4.05
5.31
-31%
3.87
4%
3.69
9%
4.8
-19%
5.6 ?(4.05 - 8.7, n=4)
-38%
Load Maximum * (Watt)
8.98
10.95
-22%
7.66
15%
4.75
47%
8.2
9%
9.78 ?(8.98 - 11, n=4)
-9%

* ... smaller is better

功耗:Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.53 (0.741-8.6)
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.18 (1.064-10.1)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.886 (0.855-1.14)
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.221 (1.179-1.336)

功耗:GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

012345Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.35 (4.07-4.77)
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.08 (4.83-5.23)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.886 (0.855-1.14)
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.221 (1.179-1.336)

电池寿命

Redmi Note 15 5G 的电池续航时间非常出色,不出所料,与 Poco M8 5G 不相上下。 Poco M8 5G.

手机 Nothing Phone (3a)然而,它却令人印象深刻地证明了更高的效率是可能的。尽管它的电池容量较小,但续航时间却明显更长。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
36h 34min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 144)
18h 58min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
21h 05min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 13min
Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
5520 mAh
19 h
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G
5520 mAh
19.3 h
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
5000 mAh
14.8 h
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
5110 mAh
12.9 h
Nothing Phone (3a)
5000 mAh
20.6 h
Motorola Moto G86 Power
6720 mAh
27 h

Notebookcheck 总体评分

测试设备:Redmi Note 15 5G
ⓘ Daniel Schmidt
测试设备:Redmi Note 15 5G

Redmi Note 15 5G 被证明是一款经济实惠的全能型产品,它提供明亮的 120 Hz AMOLED 显示屏、强劲的电池续航能力、坚固的 IP65 机箱以及高达Android 19 的更新支持。它的弱点在于相机灵活性、扬声器质量和重广告的软件体验。它是注重价值的用户的理想选择,但不太适合优先考虑多媒体性能的用户。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G - 02/27/2026 v8
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
89%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
44 / 69 → 64%
Weight
91%
Battery
92%
Display
89%
Games Performance
14 / 55 → 25%
Application Performance
61 / 85 → 72%
AI Performance
10%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
73 / 90 → 81%
Camera
59%
Average
64%
77%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
75%
Power Use
97%
Repairability
60%
Software Updates
89%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 53.5%

可能的替代品一览

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
76.5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1
List Price: 300€178 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.77"
2392x1080
388 PPI
AMOLED
2.
76.3%
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 2.1
List Price: 300€178 g512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.77"
2392x1080
388 PPI
AMOLED
3.
78%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘
6 GB Memory, 256 GB 
List Price: 379€195 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"
2340x1080
385 PPI
Super AMOLED
4.
75.4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025 ⎘
IMG BXM-8-256 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1
190 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"
2400x1080
395 PPI
AMOLED
5.
79.2%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
201 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.77"
2392x1080
387 PPI
AMOLED
6.
76.3%
Motorola Moto G86 Power
Motorola Moto G86 Power
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1
List Price: 330€198 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"
2712x1220
446 PPI
OLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Redmi Note 15 5G 能否赢得所有人的青睐?
Daniel Schmidt, 2026-03- 3 (Update: 2026-03- 3)