Redmi Note 15 5G 评论
Redmi Note 15 5G 是经济实惠的中端产品中综合实力较强的一款。它拥有极亮的 120 Hz AMOLED 显示屏、非常出色的电池续航时间、坚固的 IP65 级外壳以及高达Android 19 的长期更新承诺,这一切都使它既适合日常使用,又相对面向未来。与此同时,摄像头、扬声器、连接限制(如 eSIM 和 Vo5G 的缺失)以及重广告的软件显然与理想相去甚远。因此,这款手机更像是一款理性的长跑运动员,而不是真正的多媒体推荐产品。
与几乎完全相同的 Poco M8 5G 相比,红米手机以其更多功能的相机配置证明了其更高的价格。优先考虑显示质量、电池续航时间和长期软件支持的用户会在这里找到更强的选择,而对照片、视频和音频要求较高的用户可能会更喜欢三星Galaxy A 系列或 Nothing 等竞争对手的机型。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
Table of Contents
- Redmi Note 15 5G 评论
- 规格:小米Redmi Note 15 5G
- 外壳:结构坚固,可延长智能手机的使用寿命
- 功能 Redmi Note 15 5G 提供两种存储类型
- 软件:Redmi Note 15 5G 将接受更新,更新至Android 19
- 通信和全球导航卫星系统:Redmi Note 15 5G,带单频全球导航卫星系统和交流 WiFi
- 电话和通话质量
- 摄像头:设置稳固,灵活性有限
- 配件和保修:Redmi Note 15 5G,可选小米贴心服务
- 输入设备和操作:小米手机中的光学指纹传感器
- 显示屏:极高亮度的护眼面板
- 性能:由于采用了更老的 Snapdragon 处理器,速度更快
- 游戏:忙碌时最好不要玩
- 排放:性能稳定的红米智能手机
- 电池寿命:Redmi Note 15 5G 内含 5520 毫安时电池
- Notebookcheck 总体评分
- 可能的替代品一览
小米Redmi Note 15 5G 继承了去年的 Redmi Note 14 5G并在几个关键领域进行了改进,包括峰值显示亮度、电池容量、视频功能和 IP 防护等级。
其兄弟机型 Poco M8 5G乍一看几乎一模一样。不过,红米变体采用了改进的摄像头设置,使其略有不同。
这两款手机中哪一款最终会被证明是更好的选择,以及它能否对三星的领跑者构成真正的挑战,仍然是一个关键问题。
规格:小米Redmi Note 15 5G
外壳:结构坚固,可延长智能手机的使用寿命
Redmi Note 15 5G 有黑色和冰川蓝两种颜色。与前代产品的 7.99 毫米相比,新机型更加纤薄,仅为标称的 7.35 毫米。我们自己测量的结果是 7.4 毫米,摄像头模块的最高点为 10.75 毫米。由于机身侧面采用了柔和的弧形设计,小米手机给人的感觉比实际要窄,拿在手上非常舒适。
正面由不明高强度玻璃保护,边框和背面则由塑料制成。小米手机打着 "Titan Tough"(泰坦坚韧)的旗号,称其特别耐用。这不仅体现在其 IP65 防护等级上,还体现在其宣称的抗摔性上。根据制造商的说法,它可以经受从 1.7 米高处跌落到大理石表面而不受损害。此外,它还能抵御零下 40 摄氏度到零上 70 摄氏度的极端温度,并据称具有更好的抗刮擦性能。在我们评测期间进行的几次腰部高度跌落测试中,Redmi Note 15 5G 完全毫发无损。
制造质量总体良好。虽然仔细观察会发现背板并不总是与边框完全齐平,但大部分缝隙都很均匀。智能手机在尝试扭转时感觉很坚固,不过会产生明显的吱吱声。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
功能 Redmi Note 15 5G 提供两种存储类型
来自小米的Redmi Note 15 5G 有 6 GB 内存和 128 GB 内置存储两种版本,也有 8 GB 和 256 GB 两种版本。两个版本都支持通过 microSD 卡扩展存储空间。此外,还配备了 NFC 和红外触发器。
与 Redmi Note 14 5G不同的是,当前机型不再提供耳机插孔。卡托是一个混合插槽,这意味着它既可以容纳两张 nano SIM 卡,也可以容纳一张 nano SIM 卡和一张 microSD 卡。不支持 eSIM 卡。



microSD 读卡器
Redmi Note 15 5G 的 microSD 卡插槽在复制测试中的传输速率只能算中等。不过,在跨平台磁盘测试中的性能却很稳定,尤其是在读取数据时。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Motorola Moto G86 Power (Angelbird V60) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (5.72 - 58.9, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Poco M8 5G (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
跨平台磁盘测试 (CPDT)
软件:Redmi Note 15 5G 将接受更新,更新至Android 19
Redmi Note 15 5G 预装了谷歌Android 15 和小米 HyperOS 2.0。根据制造商提供的信息,该手机计划接收的版本升级最高可达Android 19,同时还将接收为期六年的安全补丁,一直持续到 2032 年 1 月。
红米手机支持小米互联等功能,但不包括 HyperAI。图库应用确实提供了一些人工智能工具,包括物体移除和天空替换。
与前几代产品一样,小米手机预装了许多第三方应用程序,不过这些应用程序可以卸载。与更昂贵的机型相比,集成到系统中的广告更为突出。 小米网站上的一篇文章介绍了用户如何删除或限制这些广告。
可持续性
小米没有提供有关Redmi Note 15 5G 可持续发展方面的具体信息。智能手机装在纸箱中,但用塑料套密封。
首批更换部件已在小米网站上列出,用户可以购买。预计维修指南也将很快推出。
通信和全球导航卫星系统:Redmi Note 15 5G,带单频全球导航卫星系统和交流 WiFi
在连接功能方面,Redmi Note 15 5G 仅提供基本功能:交流 WiFi、NFC、蓝牙 5.1 和频段覆盖良好的 5G。
移动网络和 WiFi 的接收质量都不错。与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT AXE11000 的传输速度不是特别高,但在整个测试过程中保持稳定。
| Networking | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi Poco M8 5G | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Nothing Phone (3a) | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Motorola Moto G86 Power | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
电话和通话质量
Redmi Note 15 5G 配备了混合 SIM 卡插槽,可以使用两张 SIM 卡,但前提是必须省略 microSD 卡。遗憾的是,它不支持 eSIM 卡。支持 WiFi 通话和 VoLTE,但不支持 Vo5G。
将手机放在耳边时,通话质量还算不错,但对环境噪声的过滤不足。扬声器可以在安静的环境中舒适地使用,但其麦克风范围有限,而且会有轻微的回音。
不支持通过小米服务进行离线通信。虚拟接近传感器在日常使用中运行可靠,而其他机型并非总是如此。
摄像头:设置稳固,灵活性有限
前置摄像头像素很高,但不支持像素二进制。虽然动态范围较窄,而且在弱光环境下会出现明显的噪点,但它能拍摄出相当吸引人的图像。视频录制仅限于每秒 30 帧的全高清格式。
后置主摄像头采用了 1.08 亿像素的传感器,并提供光学防抖功能。图像锐化程度相当高,减少了细节,但色彩平衡总体上控制得很好。明亮区域容易曝光过度。
与 Poco M8 上的深度传感器相比,额外的超广角摄像头无疑是更好的选择,但图像质量仍然难以令人信服。细节不够清晰,景深较浅。
变焦完全采用数字技术,放大倍率可达 20 倍。变焦到三倍左右时,效果还可以接受。超过这个倍率,图像区域会分裂成可见的像素群,OIS 也会达到极限。
主摄像头可进行 720p、1080p 或超高清视频录制,但只能达到每秒 30 帧。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light在可控的照明条件下,测试图即使是边缘也能保持相当清晰,但细微之处,包括图像中央,则显得模糊不清。
色彩还原总体良好,但饱和色调的呈现略显过度。


配件和保修:Redmi Note 15 5G,可选小米贴心服务
Redmi Note 15 5G 随附一条 USB 数据线(Type A 转 Type C)、一个 SIM 卡工具和一个黑色硅胶保护套。兼容的 45 瓦电源适配器可从Xiaomi 单独购买。.
该智能手机享有 12 个月的全球制造商保修服务。这不影响任何 法定保修义务零售商提供的任何法定保修义务。小米 Care 也适用于 Note 15,两年的保修价格为 39 欧元,如果包含防盗保护,则为 59 欧元。
输入设备和操作:小米手机中的光学指纹传感器
显示屏:极高亮度的护眼面板
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 979 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.3 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.76}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.6 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
95.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
CCT: 6688 K
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G AMOLED, 2392x1080, 6.8" | Xiaomi Poco M8 5G AMOLED, 2392x1080, 6.8" | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Nothing Phone (3a) AMOLED, 2392x1080, 6.8" | Motorola Moto G86 Power OLED, 2712x1220, 6.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 6% | -7% | -12% | -55% | 4% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 979 | 953 -3% | 1127 15% | 1147 17% | 1287 31% | 1429 46% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 969 | 954 -2% | 1137 17% | 1146 18% | 1274 31% | 1357 40% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 95 | 95 0% | 98 3% | 96 1% | 97 2% | 91 -4% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | ||||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 1 23% | 1.8 -38% | 1.6 -23% | 1.9 -46% | 1.4 -8% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.6 | 2.3 12% | 2.8 -8% | 3.7 -42% | 8.7 -235% | 3.21 -23% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 1.5 6% | 2.1 -31% | 2.3 -44% | 3.4 -113% | 2 -25% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.22 99% | 2.11 104% | 2.27 97% | 2.26 97% | 2.251 98% |
| CCT | 6688 97% | 6694 97% | 6466 101% | 6368 102% | 7072 92% | 6364 102% |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| Nothing Phone (3a) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 60 Hz Amplitude: 13.61 % Secondary Frequency: 3333 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8002 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图)
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.5435 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.5845 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.1 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.99 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.43 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.5615 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.4 ms). | ||
在室外,红米智能手机给人留下了良好的印象,在大多数光线条件下都能轻松阅读。只有玻璃上的反光会让人分心。
即使在视角较浅的情况下,Redmi Note 15 5G 也能始终保持清晰易读。只是从侧面看,图像略显暗淡和冷色。

性能:由于采用了更老的 Snapdragon 处理器,速度更快
虽然 Redmi Note 14 5G仍然依赖于 联发科 Dimensity 7025而 Note 15 5G 则使用 高通骁龙 6 代 32024,搭配 8GB LPDDR4x 内存。这样的改变是有回报的,因为目前的机型在 CPU 任务和整体系统响应速度方面都能提供明显更高的性能。
| Antutu v11 - Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (584158 - 4273120, n=19, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (857561 - 885038, n=2) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G | |
| UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
| Motorola Moto G86 Power | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3769 - 81594, n=130, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (8253 - 9416, n=4) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G | |
| Nothing Phone (3a) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
集成的 Adreno 710负责图形计算,与去年的机型相比,性能同样有明显提升。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
| Nothing Phone (3a) | |
| Motorola Moto G86 Power | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco M8 5G | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
| Nothing Phone (3a) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G86 Power | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco M8 5G | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
| Nothing Phone (3a) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco M8 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G86 Power | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
| Nothing Phone (3a) | |
| Motorola Moto G86 Power | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco M8 5G | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
| Nothing Phone (3a) | |
| Motorola Moto G86 Power | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco M8 5G | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G86 Power | |
| Nothing Phone (3a) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco M8 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
| Nothing Phone (3a) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco M8 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G86 Power | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| Nothing Phone (3a) | |
| Motorola Moto G86 Power | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco M8 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
| Nothing Phone (3a) | |
| Motorola Moto G86 Power | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco M8 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Nothing Phone (3a) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco M8 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G86 Power | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| Nothing Phone (3a) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G86 Power | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco M8 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
| Nothing Phone (3a) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco M8 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G86 Power | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
| Nothing Phone (3a) | |
| Motorola Moto G86 Power | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco M8 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Nothing Phone (3a) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco M8 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G86 Power | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Nothing Phone (3a) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco M8 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G86 Power | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Nothing Phone (3a) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco M8 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G86 Power | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| Nothing Phone (3a) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco M8 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G86 Power | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
| GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Nothing Phone (3a) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco M8 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G86 Power | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
在日常使用中,Redmi Note 15 5G 提供了稳定的浏览性能,我们从未感觉到它的局限性。不过,许多竞争设备的速度明显更快。
| Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score | |
| Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (23.8 - 358, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G (Chrome 145) | |
| Motorola Moto G86 Power (Chrome 140) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (117 - 147.8, n=4) | |
| Xiaomi Poco M8 5G (Chrome 144.0.7559.132) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 643, n=113, last 2 years) | |
| Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135) | |
| Motorola Moto G86 Power (Chrome 140) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G (Chrome 145) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (105 - 141, n=3) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135) | |
| Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 42.8, n=123, last 2 years) | |
| Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G (Chrome 145) | |
| Motorola Moto G86 Power (Chrome 140) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (6.94 - 9.32, n=3) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49) | |
| WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
| Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (27 - 306, n=137, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (107 - 140, n=4) | |
| Motorola Moto G86 Power (Chrome 140) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G (Chrome 145) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 126661, n=188, last 2 years) | |
| Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G (Chrome 145) | |
| Motorola Moto G86 Power (Chrome 140) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (37483 - 40500, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=149, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (978 - 1476, n=4) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49) | |
| Motorola Moto G86 Power (Chrome 140) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G (Chrome 145) | |
| Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135) | |
* ... smaller is better
UFS 2.2 存储器原则上应能实现较高的数据传输速率,但 SoC 似乎是限制因素。
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G | Xiaomi Poco M8 5G | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | Nothing Phone (3a) | Motorola Moto G86 Power | Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -5% | -37% | -2% | 8% | -4% | -8% | 73% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 911.87 | 1042.73 14% | 968.34 6% | 950.62 4% | 1031.34 13% | 982.2 8% | 910 ? 0% | 2140 ? 135% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 867.34 | 893.75 3% | 166.77 -81% | 792.56 -9% | 1001.28 15% | 701.2 -19% | 739 ? -15% | 1841 ? 112% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 222.77 | 146.5 -34% | 233.98 5% | 257.91 16% | 245.48 10% | 218.4 -2% | 225 ? 1% | 294 ? 32% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 302.72 | 294.99 -3% | 62.58 -79% | 245.16 -19% | 285.24 -6% | 289.9 -4% | 248 ? -18% | 346 ? 14% |
游戏:忙碌时最好不要玩
骁龙 660 Adreno 710为游戏设置了明确的限制。休闲游戏没有问题,但要求更高的游戏可能会出现卡顿或需要降低细节设置。
PUBG Mobile》就是一个很好的例子,我们使用GameBench 对其进行了分析。.该游戏可在超高清预设值下运行,但由于没有光线追踪等功能,因此视觉效果仍达不到最高水平。
排放:性能稳定的红米智能手机
温度
尽管小米Redmi Note 15 5G 没有使用高端 SoC,但设备表面某些区域的温度明显升高,最高可达 44 摄氏度。这在日常使用中还是不成问题的。
在 3DMark 压力测试中,SoC 从未出现明显的节流现象,性能始终保持稳定。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G | |
| Nothing Phone (3a) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco M8 5G | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Nothing Phone (3a) | |
| Motorola Moto G86 Power | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco M8 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Nothing Phone (3a) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco M8 5G | |
发言人
Redmi Note 15 5G 的双扬声器被宣传为支持杜比全景声(Dolby Atmos),但在测试中的表现并不特别令人信服。声音缺乏深度和体感,显得不平衡。对于通话和偶尔的短时间媒体播放来说,它已经足够了,但仅此而已。
通过 USB-C 或蓝牙输出的音频明显要好一些。蓝牙也提供了广泛的编解码器支持,但不支持 Auracast。
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 10% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池寿命:Redmi Note 15 5G 内含 5520 毫安时电池
耗电量
Redmi Note 15 5G 的功耗令人印象深刻,在我们的控制亮度测试中,它的性能甚至超过了 三星Galaxy A36.
这款智能手机通过线缆充电的功率高达 45 瓦,但不支持无线充电。充满电仅需相对较短的 58 分钟,24 分钟后达到 50%,42 分钟后达到 80%。
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G 5520 mAh | Xiaomi Poco M8 5G 5520 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G 5110 mAh | Nothing Phone (3a) 5000 mAh | Motorola Moto G86 Power 6720 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 6% | -20% | -5% | 4% | -26% | -7% | -19% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 1.04 | 1 4% | 0.86 17% | 1.15 -11% | 0.93 11% | 1.3 -25% | 0.91 ? 12% | 0.861 ? 17% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 1.33 | 1.24 7% | 1.75 -32% | 1.55 -17% | 1.67 -26% | 1.6 -20% | 1.306 ? 2% | 1.442 ? -8% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 1.38 | 1.27 8% | 1.82 -32% | 1.57 -14% | 1.68 -22% | 2.4 -74% | 1.428 ? -3% | 1.626 ? -18% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 4.05 | 5.31 -31% | 3.87 4% | 3.69 9% | 4.8 -19% | 5.6 ? -38% | 6.6 ? -63% | |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 8.98 | 10.95 -22% | 7.66 15% | 4.75 47% | 8.2 9% | 9.78 ? -9% | 10.9 ? -21% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗:Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
功耗:GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
电池寿命
Redmi Note 15 5G 的电池续航时间非常出色,不出所料,与 Poco M8 5G 不相上下。 Poco M8 5G.
手机 Nothing Phone (3a)然而,它却令人印象深刻地证明了更高的效率是可能的。尽管它的电池容量较小,但续航时间却明显更长。
Notebookcheck 总体评分

Redmi Note 15 5G 被证明是一款经济实惠的全能型产品,它提供明亮的 120 Hz AMOLED 显示屏、强劲的电池续航能力、坚固的 IP65 机箱以及高达Android 19 的更新支持。它的弱点在于相机灵活性、扬声器质量和重广告的软件体验。它是注重价值的用户的理想选择,但不太适合优先考虑多媒体性能的用户。
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
- 02/27/2026 v8
Daniel Schmidt
可能的替代品一览
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | List Price: 300€ | 178 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.77" 2392x1080 388 PPI AMOLED | |
| Xiaomi Poco M8 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 2.1 | List Price: 300€ | 178 g | 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.77" 2392x1080 388 PPI AMOLED | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘ 6 GB Memory, 256 GB | List Price: 379€ | 195 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" 2340x1080 385 PPI Super AMOLED | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025 ⎘ IMG BXM-8-256 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | 190 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" 2400x1080 395 PPI AMOLED | ||
| Nothing Phone (3a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | 201 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.77" 2392x1080 387 PPI AMOLED | ||
| Motorola Moto G86 Power MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | List Price: 330€ | 198 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" 2712x1220 446 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.



























































