判决
凭借 Edge 60 Neo,摩托罗拉在中端市场创造了一款令人兴奋的智能手机。它的目标用户是注重设计和功能的价格敏感型用户,而不是性能发烧友。Dimensity 7400 的性能在中端手机中不算特别强大,在日常使用中常常显得有些力不从心,但在我们看来,联发科 SoC 并不影响使用。
作为回报,购买 Edge 60 Neo 的用户可以在低于 400 欧元(约合 466 美元)的价格范围内获得一些有趣的功能,例如 eSIM 支持、无线充电、防水外壳、采用 LTPO 技术的明亮 OLED 面板以及非常吸引人的外观。对于一款小巧轻便的手机来说,出色的电池续航能力是这款摩托罗拉手机的锦上添花之处。
Edge 60 Neo 的上市时间更长,价格也随之下降,在经济实惠的中端手机中具有令人兴奋的优势/劣势。
Pros
Cons
摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Neo 的价格和供货情况
摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Neo 可直接从制造商处购买,建议零售价为 399.99 欧元(约合 466 美元)起。此外,在测试期间,这款中档手机的供应(仍然)受到一定限制,仅在少数几家在线零售商有售。
Table of Contents
- 判决
- 摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Neo 的规格
- 外壳 - IP68 防护等级的廉价手机
- 功能 -Android 带 USB 2.0 接口的手机
- 软件 - 价格低廉、更新时间长的智能手机
- 通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Android-无 WiFi 的手机 7
- 电话功能和语音质量 - 摩托罗拉采用 nano-SIM 卡和 eSIM 卡
- 摄像头 -Android-带 OIS 的手机
- 配件和保修 - 带保护盖的经济型智能手机
- 输入设备和操作 - 配备指纹传感器和面部解锁功能
- 显示屏 - 摩托罗拉 OLED 手机
- 性能 - 摩托罗拉手机采用联发科技术
- 辐射 - 具有适度散热功能的摩托罗拉手机
- 电池续航时间 - 可无线充电的廉价智能手机
- Notebookcheck 总体评分
- 可比较的替代品
摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Neo 的屏幕对角线为 6.36 英寸,是 Edge 60 系列中最小巧的智能手机。 Edge 60 系列与其前代产品 前代.这款物美价廉的中档手机基于 联发科 Dimensity 7400和一些高级功能,如无线充电和 eSIM 支持。
摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Neo 的规格
外壳 - IP68 防护等级的廉价手机
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
功能 -Android 带 USB 2.0 接口的手机
在功能方面,Edge 60 Neo 提供用于无线图像传输的 Miracast 以及蓝牙 5.4 和 NFC。不过,由于采用的是 USB-C 连接,USB 2.0 标准意味着你必须接受数据传输速度和图像输出衰减方面的妥协。
软件 - 价格低廉、更新时间长的智能手机
通过四年的操作系统升级,摩托罗拉手机将在Android 19 之前收到更新。这款中端手机还将在 2031 年 6 月之前收到安全补丁。这使 Edge 60 Neo 处于有利地位,即使 三星更新的时间更长一些。
在测试过程中,2025 年 9 月的安全补丁不再完全是最新的。
可持续性
Edge 60 Neo 的包装不使用塑料,但没有关于二氧化碳排放量或所用材料的信息。在 EPREL 数据库中,摩托罗拉手机的可维修性指数被评为 A 级。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Android-无 WiFi 的手机 7
Edge 60 Neo 的内置蜂窝调制解调器提供了广泛的频率范围,可用于 LTE 和 5G 连接。
虽然摩托罗拉的这款中端手机没有使用 WiFi 7,但它使用了包括 6 GHz 频段在内的 WiFi 6,这意味着使用华硕参考路由器的传输速率相当快,而且基本稳定。
| Networking | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Neo | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| OnePlus Nord CE 5 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Motorola Edge 50 Neo | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
电话功能和语音质量 - 摩托罗拉采用 nano-SIM 卡和 eSIM 卡
摄像头 -Android-带 OIS 的手机
摩托罗拉的这款中端手机配备了一个 5000 万像素的主摄像头,采用 1/1.56 英寸格式,基于索尼 LYTIA 700,具有光学防抖功能。在白天,Edge 60 Neo 的成像性能良好,清晰度也不错。考虑到摩托罗拉手机的价格水平,其低光质量和色彩还原也很吸引人。我们的对比照片 Apple iPhone 17更有利于价格低廉的 Edge 60 Neo。
不过,广角镜头明显受到了省钱的压力,因为 1300 万像素的图像既不特别锐利,也没有显示太多细节。此外,还有许多伪影。由于配备了包括 OIS 和三倍光学放大在内的专用长焦摄像头,变焦照片的效果非常好。不过,不建议使用 Edge 60 Neo 进行超过 5 倍的变焦。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera Main camera Wide angleLow Light

配件和保修 - 带保护盖的经济型智能手机
包装中不包括电源装置,但包括一个外壳颜色的时尚硬盒、一条数据线或充电线(USB-C 至 USB-C)和一个 SIM 卡工具。没有贴保护膜。
Edge 60 Neo 具有 保修在德国的保修期为 24 个月。
输入设备和操作 - 配备指纹传感器和面部解锁功能
显示屏 - 摩托罗拉 OLED 手机
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1132 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.55 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.78}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
103.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.107
CCT: 6473 K
| Motorola Edge 60 Neo pOLED, 2670x1200, 6.4" | OnePlus Nord CE 5 AMOLED, 2392x1080, 6.8" | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Poco F7 AMOLED, 2772x1280, 6.8" | Motorola Edge 50 Neo P-OLED, 2670x1220, 6.4" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 6% | -7% | 14% | -11% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1132 | 1315 16% | 1127 0% | 1616 43% | 1246 10% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1114 | 1300 17% | 1137 2% | 1637 47% | 1235 11% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 98 | 97 -1% | 98 0% | 95 -3% | 98 0% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.55 | 1.22 21% | 1.8 -16% | 1.1 29% | 1.8 -16% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.28 | 2.7 18% | 2.8 15% | 2.8 15% | 3.81 -16% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 2 -33% | 2.1 -40% | 2.2 -47% | 2.3 -53% |
| Gamma | 2.107 104% | 2.258 97% | 2.11 104% | 2.24 98% | 2.191 100% |
| CCT | 6473 100% | 6503 100% | 6466 101% | 6639 98% | 6488 100% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 242 Hz Amplitude: 10 % | ||
The display backlight flickers at 242 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 242 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8121 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图)
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.2 ms rise | |
| ↘ 1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 3.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.3 ms rise | |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.6 ms). | ||
Edge 60 Neo 在室外给人留下了良好的印象,不过不要指望它拥有旗舰手机的亮度储备。 旗舰手机.即使从较浅的角度观看,OLED 面板的可视角度也能保持稳定。
性能 - 摩托罗拉手机采用联发科技术
Edge 60 Neo 安装的 SoC 及其系统速度并不是这款中端手机的优势所在。与 小米 Poco F7甚至 OnePlus Nord CE 5的性能差距 联发科 Dimensity 7400在单核心和多核心基准测试中都很明显。
在日常使用中,Edge 60 Neo 给人的感觉并不是很自信,Hello UI 界面经常会有明显的生涩感。
| Antutu v10 - Total Score | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 3269237, n=152, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Neo | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400X (n=1) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Neo | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400X (27580 - 27865, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3769 - 81594, n=137, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| AImark - Score v3.x | |
| Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=126, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Neo | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400X (n=1) | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
图形单元的性能差异比 CPU 基准测试还要大。图形处理器 Mali-G615 MP2摩托罗拉手机的 Mali-G615 MP2 在 GFXBench 的 4K 测试中只能达到 8 fps,而竞争对手的数值要高出三到五倍。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 | |
| OnePlus Nord CE 5 | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| Motorola Edge 50 Neo | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 | |
| OnePlus Nord CE 5 | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| Motorola Edge 50 Neo | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 | |
| OnePlus Nord CE 5 | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| Motorola Edge 50 Neo | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Neo | |
| Motorola Edge 50 Neo | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Neo | |
| Motorola Edge 50 Neo | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Neo | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Neo | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Neo | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 | |
| OnePlus Nord CE 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Neo | |
| Motorola Edge 50 Neo | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 | |
| OnePlus Nord CE 5 | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| Motorola Edge 50 Neo | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 | |
| OnePlus Nord CE 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Neo | |
| Motorola Edge 50 Neo | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 | |
| OnePlus Nord CE 5 | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| Motorola Edge 50 Neo | |
| GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 | |
| OnePlus Nord CE 5 | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| Motorola Edge 50 Neo | |
| Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total Score | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 (Chrome 138.0.7204.168) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2 - 469, n=45, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135) | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Neo (Chrome 141) | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400X (125.7 - 138.8, n=2) | |
| WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 (Chrome 138.0.7204.168) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (27 - 306, n=147, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135) | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400X (118 - 119, n=2) | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Neo (Chrome 141) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 (Chrome 138.0.7204.168) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 121337, n=200, last 2 years) | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400X (35354 - 41357, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135) | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Neo (Chrome 141) | |
| Motorola Edge 50 Neo | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=155, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135) | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400X (1022 - 1038, n=2) | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Neo (Chrome 141) | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 (Chrome 138.0.7204.168) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Motorola Edge 60 Neo | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | Xiaomi Poco F7 | Motorola Edge 50 Neo | Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCMark for Android | -12% | 180% | -2% | 8% | 46% | |
| Storage 2.0 seq. read int. (MB/s) | 864 ? | 845 ? -2% | 3242 ? 275% | 874 ? 1% | 1398 ? 62% | 1708 ? 98% |
| Storage 2.0 seq. write int. (MB/s) | 843 ? | 480 ? -43% | 3377 ? 301% | 835 ? -1% | 1102 ? 31% | 1576 ? 87% |
| Storage 2.0 random read int. (MB/s) | 51.1 ? | 33.9 ? -34% | 49.1 ? -4% | 51.2 ? 0% | 38.4 ? -25% | 42.7 ? -16% |
| Storage 2.0 random write int. (MB/s) | 82.5 ? | 39 ? -53% | 62 ? -25% | 77.9 ? -6% | 60.6 ? -27% | 69.5 ? -16% |
| Storage 2.0 (Points) | 32735 ? | 55507 ? 70% | 148268 ? 353% | 31677 ? -3% | 31945 ? -2% | 58112 ? 78% |
辐射 - 具有适度散热功能的摩托罗拉手机
温度
在持续负载的情况下,表面温度明显升高,但并不明显。尤其是在 3DMark 压力测试中,Edge 60 Neo 的废热并不明显。摩托罗拉智能手机只是略有节流或根本没有节流。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.3 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Motorola Edge 50 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Neo | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Motorola Edge 50 Neo | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Neo | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
| OnePlus Nord CE 5 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 | |
| Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Neo | |
| Motorola Edge 50 Neo | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 | |
发言人
立体声扬声器的声音几乎没有低音,但在同价位产品中基本上还算不错。粉红噪声"(Pink Noise)的中音有所提升,但高音也相当均匀。此外,还可通过 USB 端口或蓝牙 5.4 无线连接耳机。有多种音频编解码器可供选择。
Motorola Edge 60 Neo audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池续航时间 - 可无线充电的廉价智能手机
能源消耗
Edge 60 Neo 配备 5,000 毫安时电池,可通过 USB-C 接口以 68 瓦的功率充电,或以 15 瓦的功率无线充电。在功耗测试中,这款配备了 Dimensity 7400、在耗电测试中,配备 Dimensity 7400 的中端手机被证明是相当经济的,整体能耗并不特别高。
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Neo 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Poco F7 6500 mAh | Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400X | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -13% | -17% | -3% | -12% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 0.8 | 0.86 -8% | 1.18 -48% | 0.77 ? 4% | 0.848 ? -6% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 1.2 | 1.75 -46% | 1.44 -20% | 1.405 ? -17% | 1.435 ? -20% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 1.7 | 1.82 -7% | 1.48 13% | 1.71 ? -1% | 1.621 ? 5% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 5.4 | 5.31 2% | 7.62 -41% | 5.4 ? -0% | 6.99 ? -29% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 10.1 | 10.95 -8% | 8.92 12% | 10.1 ? -0% | 11.3 ? -12% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗:Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
功耗:GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
电池寿命
在实际条件下,Edge 60 Neo 在我们的 WLAN 测试中表现出了紧凑型手机的出色电池续航能力。与 Edge 50 Neo这款中档手机的续航时间超过 24 小时。
| Motorola Edge 60 Neo 5000 mAh | OnePlus Nord CE 5 5200 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Poco F7 6500 mAh | Motorola Edge 50 Neo 4310 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 24.4 | 16.9 -31% | 14.8 -39% | 22.7 -7% | 13.7 -44% |
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
- 12/03/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich
可比较的替代品
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Motorola Edge 60 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7400X ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $9.88 LXEEOLX Ultra-Thin Flexible ... 2. $9.85 Lyepetik [2 Pack] Hydrogel S... 3. $9.89 Silsewip [2pcs] Hydrogel Scr... List Price: 399€ | 175 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.36" 2670x1200 460 PPI pOLED | |
| OnePlus Nord CE 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8350 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB | Amazon: $605.00 List Price: 349€ | 199 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.77" 2392x1080 388 PPI AMOLED | |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘ 6 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $299.99 Samsung Galaxy A36 5G A Seri... 2. $269.40 SAMSUNG Galaxy A36 5G 2025 |... 3. $278.90 Samsung Galaxy A36 5G 2025 |... List Price: 379€ | 195 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" 2340x1080 385 PPI Super AMOLED | |
| Xiaomi Poco F7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 825 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $579.99 XIAOMI Poco F7 PRO 5G + 4G L... 2. $339.50 XIAOMI Poco X7 PRO 5G + 4G L... 3. $11.99 Ibywind for Xiaomi Poco F7 5... | 215.7 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.83" 2772x1280 447 PPI AMOLED | |
| Motorola Edge 50 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $6.64 Natbok 2 Pack 3D Compatible ... 2. $4.99 Mr.Shield Screen Protector c... 3. CeiLarv 3 Pack for Motorola ... List Price: 499€ | 171 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.40" 2670x1220 459 PPI P-OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
























































