Notebookcheck Logo
摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Neo 智能手机评测

时尚廉价的高端智能手机 - 摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Neo 评测

轻巧方便。

Edge 60 Neo 不仅外观时尚,而且符合军用标准,特别坚固耐用。除了体积小巧、重量轻之外,这款中档手机的无线充电等高端功能也给人留下了深刻印象,而且价格实惠,不到 400 欧元(约合 466 美元)。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Smartphone Touchscreen

判决

凭借 Edge 60 Neo,摩托罗拉在中端市场创造了一款令人兴奋的智能手机。它的目标用户是注重设计和功能的价格敏感型用户,而不是性能发烧友。Dimensity 7400 的性能在中端手机中不算特别强大,在日常使用中常常显得有些力不从心,但在我们看来,联发科 SoC 并不影响使用。

作为回报,购买 Edge 60 Neo 的用户可以在低于 400 欧元(约合 466 美元)的价格范围内获得一些有趣的功能,例如 eSIM 支持、无线充电、防水外壳、采用 LTPO 技术的明亮 OLED 面板以及非常吸引人的外观。对于一款小巧轻便的手机来说,出色的电池续航能力是这款摩托罗拉手机的锦上添花之处。

Edge 60 Neo 的上市时间更长,价格也随之下降,在经济实惠的中端手机中具有令人兴奋的优势/劣势。

Pros

+ 别致的设计
+ 轻质结构
+ 高耐用性
+ 运行时间长
+ 更新时间长
+ 无线充电

Cons

- 系统性能低下
- 只有Android 15 ex 可以使用
- 低音
- 仅 USB 2.0

摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Neo 的价格和供货情况

摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Neo 可直接从制造商处购买,建议零售价为 399.99 欧元(约合 466 美元)起。此外,在测试期间,这款中档手机的供应(仍然)受到一定限制,仅在少数几家在线零售商有售。

Amazon Logo
$9.88
LXEEOLX Ultra-Thin Flexible Film for Motorola Edge 60 Neo, 0.11mm, High Touch Sensitivity, HD Clear Hydrogel Screen Protector (2 Pack)
  • $9.85
    Lyepetik [2 Pack] Hydrogel Screen Protector for Motorola Edge 60 Neo, Upgraded Non-breakable Flexible TPU Flexible Protective Film [Bubble Free] [High Sensitivity][Anti-Scratch] (Non-Tempered Glass)
  • $9.89
    Silsewip [2pcs] Hydrogel Screen Protector for Motorola Edge 60 Neo, Ultra-Thin, High Sensitivity Flexible TPU Flim Perfect for Daily Use (Non-tempered glass)

摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Neo 的屏幕对角线为 6.36 英寸,是 Edge 60 系列中最小巧的智能手机。 Edge 60 系列与其前代产品 前代.这款物美价廉的中档手机基于 联发科 Dimensity 7400和一些高级功能,如无线充电和 eSIM 支持。

摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Neo 的规格

Motorola Edge 60 Neo (Edge 60 Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 7400X 8 x 2 - 2.6 GHz, Cortex-A78 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR4X
Display
6.36 inch 20:9, 2670 x 1200 pixel 460 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, pOLED, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 215 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, OTG, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B25/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B42/​B43/​B66), 5G (n1/​n2/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n26/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n66/​n75/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.1 x 154.1 x 71.2
Battery
5000 mAh
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/​1.8, OIS, videos @2160p/​30fps) + 13 0MPix (f/​2.4, wide, makro) + 10 MPix (f/​2.0, OIS, 3x optical, teleo)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/​2.4)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, USB cable, case, SIM-Tool, 24 Months Warranty, SAR-Wert: 0.86W/​kg head, 1.31W/​kg body | IP68/​IP69, MIL-STD-810H, fanless, waterproof
Weight
175 g
Price
399 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳 - IP68 防护等级的廉价手机

摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Neo 的颜色选择
摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Neo 的颜色选择

Edge 60 Neo 的外壳做工精良,手感轻盈,给人留下深刻印象。边框由塑料制成,背面则采用硅胶表面处理,灵感来自斜纹织物。由于采用了 Pantone 颜色,这不仅看起来别致,而且橡胶涂层还带来了防滑的感觉。背面几乎看不到指纹。

这款摩托罗拉智能手机通过了 IP69/IP68 和 MIL-STD 810H 标准认证,外壳特别防水、防尘、防机械应力。正面采用大猩猩 7i 玻璃保护,屏占比高达 89%,令人印象深刻。得益于纤薄的边缘,这款中档手机不仅做工精良,而且外观时尚。

测试摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Neo 智能手机
测试摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Neo 智能手机
测试摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Neo 智能手机

尺寸比较

163.6 mm 76 mm 8.2 mm 199 g163.1 mm 77.9 mm 8.2 mm 215.7 g162.9 mm 78.2 mm 7.4 mm 195 g154.1 mm 71.2 mm 8.1 mm 175 g154.1 mm 71.2 mm 8.1 mm 171 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

功能 -Android 带 USB 2.0 接口的手机

在功能方面,Edge 60 Neo 提供用于无线图像传输的 Miracast 以及蓝牙 5.4 和 NFC。不过,由于采用的是 USB-C 连接,USB 2.0 标准意味着你必须接受数据传输速度和图像输出衰减方面的妥协。

软件 - 价格低廉、更新时间长的智能手机

通过四年的操作系统升级,摩托罗拉手机将在Android 19 之前收到更新。这款中端手机还将在 2031 年 6 月之前收到安全补丁。这使 Edge 60 Neo 处于有利地位,即使 三星更新的时间更长一些。

在测试过程中,2025 年 9 月的安全补丁不再完全是最新的。

测试摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Neo 智能手机

可持续性

Edge 60 Neo 的包装不使用塑料,但没有关于二氧化碳排放量或所用材料的信息。在 EPREL 数据库中,摩托罗拉手机的可维修性指数被评为 A 级。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Android-无 WiFi 的手机 7

Edge 60 Neo 的内置蜂窝调制解调器提供了广泛的频率范围,可用于 LTE 和 5G 连接。

虽然摩托罗拉的这款中端手机没有使用 WiFi 7,但它使用了包括 6 GHz 频段在内的 WiFi 6,这意味着使用华硕参考路由器的传输速率相当快,而且基本稳定。

Networking
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
763 (min: 678) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
964 (min: 828) MBit/s ∼69%
OnePlus Nord CE 5
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
536 (min: 421) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1191 (min: 961) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
860 (min: 440) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
752 (min: 713) MBit/s ∼63%
Xiaomi Poco F7
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
982 (min: 492) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
939 (min: 866) MBit/s ∼79%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
762 (min: 640) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
939 (min: 843) MBit/s ∼79%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
828 (min: 295) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
825 (min: 234) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1175 (min: 417) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1241 (min: 743) MBit/s ∼89%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
707 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
734 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼62%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1327 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1390 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼100%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
Motorola Edge 60 Neo 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø763 (678-868)
Motorola Edge 60 Neo 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø964 (828-994)
Motorola Edge 50 Neo 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø762 (640-836)
Motorola Edge 50 Neo 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø939 (843-960)
楼内定位
楼内定位
户外定位
户外定位

在户外,这款中端手机能迅速找到卫星信号,定位精度可达 2 米(约 6.5 英尺)。全球主要卫星网络都可用于定位,甚至在双频情况下也是如此。

电话功能和语音质量 - 摩托罗拉采用 nano-SIM 卡和 eSIM 卡

测试摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Neo 智能手机
测试摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Neo 智能手机

语音传输自然,背景噪音被有效过滤。Edge 60 Neo 支持 VoLTE/VoNR 和 VoWiFi 等常用功能以及双卡双待。不过,后者只有在系统中同时集成了 eSIM 卡时才能实现。

摄像头 -Android-带 OIS 的手机

与摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Neo 自拍
与摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Neo 自拍

摩托罗拉的这款中端手机配备了一个 5000 万像素的主摄像头,采用 1/1.56 英寸格式,基于索尼 LYTIA 700,具有光学防抖功能。在白天,Edge 60 Neo 的成像性能良好,清晰度也不错。考虑到摩托罗拉手机的价格水平,其低光质量和色彩还原也很吸引人。我们的对比照片 Apple iPhone 17更有利于价格低廉的 Edge 60 Neo。

不过,广角镜头明显受到了省钱的压力,因为 1300 万像素的图像既不特别锐利,也没有显示太多细节。此外,还有许多伪影。由于配备了包括 OIS 和三倍光学放大在内的专用长焦摄像头,变焦照片的效果非常好。不过,不建议使用 Edge 60 Neo 进行超过 5 倍的变焦。

0,5x
0,5x
1x
1x
2x
2x
3x
3x
5x
5x
10x
10x
30x
30x
测试摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Neo 智能手机
测试摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Neo 智能手机
测试摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Neo 智能手机
测试摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Neo 智能手机

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera Main camera Wide angleLow Light
ColorChecker
5.5 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
4 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
5 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
3 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
6 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Edge 60 Neo: 6.28 ∆E min: 2.98 - max: 9.79 ∆E
ColorChecker
17 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
20.1 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Edge 60 Neo: 15.52 ∆E min: 10.34 - max: 22.76 ∆E

配件和保修 - 带保护盖的经济型智能手机

包装中不包括电源装置,但包括一个外壳颜色的时尚硬盒、一条数据线或充电线(USB-C 至 USB-C)和一个 SIM 卡工具。没有贴保护膜。

Edge 60 Neo 具有 保修在德国的保修期为 24 个月。

输入设备和操作 - 配备指纹传感器和面部解锁功能

得益于高达 120 Hz 的高刷新率和高达 300 Hz 的采样率,摩托罗拉手机使用起来非常方便,但 Edge 60 Neo 给人的感觉并不快。振动马达也没有传递出价值感,可以更精确、更有力地满足我们的口味。

OLED 面板下的光学指纹传感器反应迅速、可靠。此外,还配备了相对不安全的 2D FaceUnlock 功能。

测试摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Neo 智能手机
测试摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Neo 智能手机
测试摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Neo 智能手机

显示屏 - 摩托罗拉 OLED 手机

显示子像素
显示子像素

Edge 60 Neo 的 pOLED 显示屏使用高达 120 Hz 的刷新率,由于采用了 LTPO 技术,刷新率可以自适应调节。在测试过程中,我们看到的最低频率为 1 Hz。在实际的 APL18 测试(平均画质水平)中,6.36 英寸 1240p 面板达到了 1942 cd/m² 的最大亮度。因此,可以完美显示高动态范围的 HDR 视频内容。

为了控制亮度,这款中端智能手机采用了 OLED 典型的 PWM 技术,基本闪烁频率约为 240 Hz。摩托罗拉没有提供任何关于护眼高频 PWM 调光的信息。

1104
cd/m²
1120
cd/m²
1121
cd/m²
1113
cd/m²
1132
cd/m²
1110
cd/m²
1109
cd/m²
1111
cd/m²
1108
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1132 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1114.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1132 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.55 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.78}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
103.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.107
CCT: 6473 K
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
pOLED, 2670x1200, 6.4"
OnePlus Nord CE 5
AMOLED, 2392x1080, 6.8"
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"
Xiaomi Poco F7
AMOLED, 2772x1280, 6.8"
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
P-OLED, 2670x1220, 6.4"
Screen
6%
-7%
14%
-11%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
1132
1315
16%
1127
0%
1616
43%
1246
10%
Brightness (cd/m²)
1114
1300
17%
1137
2%
1637
47%
1235
11%
Brightness Distribution (%)
98
97
-1%
98
0%
95
-3%
98
0%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.55
1.22
21%
1.8
-16%
1.1
29%
1.8
-16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.28
2.7
18%
2.8
15%
2.8
15%
3.81
-16%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.5
2
-33%
2.1
-40%
2.2
-47%
2.3
-53%
Gamma
2.107 104%
2.258 97%
2.11 104%
2.24 98%
2.191 100%
CCT
6473 100%
6503 100%
6466 101%
6639 98%
6488 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 242 Hz
Amplitude: 10 %

The display backlight flickers at 242 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 242 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8121 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低亮度
最低亮度
25% 亮度
25% 亮度
50% 亮度
50% 亮度
75% 亮度
75% 亮度
100% 亮度
100% 亮度

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图)

我们使用光度计和 CalMan 软件进行分析,结果显示在 sRGB 色彩空间中,平均 Delta-E 偏差非常低。除了三种色彩配置文件外,还可以在设置菜单中单独调整白平衡。

色彩准确度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩准确度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(轮廓:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(轮廓:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.3 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.6 ms).

Edge 60 Neo 在室外给人留下了良好的印象,不过不要指望它拥有旗舰手机的亮度储备。 旗舰手机.即使从较浅的角度观看,OLED 面板的可视角度也能保持稳定。

性能 - 摩托罗拉手机采用联发科技术

Edge 60 Neo 安装的 SoC 及其系统速度并不是这款中端手机的优势所在。与 小米 Poco F7甚至 OnePlus Nord CE 5的性能差距 联发科 Dimensity 7400在单核心和多核心基准测试中都很明显。

在日常使用中,Edge 60 Neo 给人的感觉并不是很自信,Hello UI 界面经常会有明显的生涩感。

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi Poco F7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
2129 Points +94%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3883, n=211, last 2 years)
1757 Points +60%
OnePlus Nord CE 5
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
1325 Points +21%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
1099 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400X
  (1087 - 1099, n=2)
1093 Points -1%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
1051 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
1033 Points -6%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Poco F7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
6792 Points +120%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 11634, n=211, last 2 years)
5130 Points +66%
OnePlus Nord CE 5
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
4201 Points +36%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
3087 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400X
  (3081 - 3087, n=2)
3084 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
2977 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
2955 Points -4%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
2043045 Points +180%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3269237, n=152, last 2 years)
1487579 Points +104%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
730590 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400X
  (n=1)
730590 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
617456 Points -15%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
17465 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400X
  (16257 - 17465, n=2)
16861 Points -3%
Xiaomi Poco F7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
15973 Points -9%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
15116 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 28557, n=188, last 2 years)
14853 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
12811 Points -27%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
27865 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400X
  (27580 - 27865, n=2)
27723 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3769 - 81594, n=137, last 2 years)
19755 Points -29%
Xiaomi Poco F7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
16446 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
8253 Points -70%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=126, last 2 years)
27034 Points +1842%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
1392 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400X
  (n=1)
1392 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
1389 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
587 Points -58%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
OnePlus Nord CE 5
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
1112 Points +95%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5210, n=54, last 2 years)
827 Points +45%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400X
  (569 - 574, n=2)
572 Points +1%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
569 Points
Xiaomi Poco F7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
468 Points -18%
Half Precision NPU 1.5
OnePlus Nord CE 5
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
4496 Points +243%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 36297, n=54, last 2 years)
3726 Points +184%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400X
  (1311 - 1389, n=2)
1350 Points +3%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
1311 Points
Xiaomi Poco F7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
466 Points -64%
Quantized NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone
  (133 - 49889, n=54, last 2 years)
5340 Points +99%
OnePlus Nord CE 5
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
4547 Points +69%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400X
  (2689 - 2852, n=2)
2771 Points +3%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
2689 Points
Xiaomi Poco F7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288
1028 Points -62%

图形单元的性能差异比 CPU 基准测试还要大。图形处理器 Mali-G615 MP2摩托罗拉手机的 Mali-G615 MP2 在 GFXBench 的 4K 测试中只能达到 8 fps,而竞争对手的数值要高出三到五倍。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
4408 Points +327%
OnePlus Nord CE 5
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2795 Points +171%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1033 Points
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
901 Points -13%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
854 Points -17%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
4482 Points +325%
OnePlus Nord CE 5
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2774 Points +163%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1054 Points
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
907 Points -14%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
864 Points -18%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
17504 Points +372%
OnePlus Nord CE 5
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9956 Points +169%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3708 Points
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3502 Points -6%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3159 Points -15%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
1697 Points +307%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
417 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
350 Points -16%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
1785 Points +334%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
411 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
336 Points -18%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps +30%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
108 fps +17%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
92 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
590 fps +350%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
131 fps
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
126 fps -4%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps +76%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps -4%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
311 fps +246%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 fps -16%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps +179%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps +19%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
255 fps +298%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps -12%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
90 fps +260%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
26 fps +4%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
25 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
142 fps +274%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
38 fps
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps -21%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
87 fps +358%
OnePlus Nord CE 5
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47 fps +147%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps +21%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18 fps -5%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
79 fps +365%
OnePlus Nord CE 5
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps +188%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
17 fps
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps -6%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps -18%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps +275%
OnePlus Nord CE 5
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69 fps +116%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps +22%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps -9%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
205 fps +356%
OnePlus Nord CE 5
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
118 fps +162%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45 fps
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps -2%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
38 fps -16%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
35 fps +355%
OnePlus Nord CE 5
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps +173%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7.7 fps
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7.1 fps -8%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6.2 fps -19%
Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F7 (Chrome 138.0.7204.168)
253.861 Points +83%
Average of class Smartphone (2 - 469, n=45, last 2 years)
222 Points +60%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)
140.362 Points +1%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo (Chrome 141)
138.767 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400X (125.7 - 138.8, n=2)
132.2 Points -5%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi Poco F7 (Chrome 138.0.7204.168)
184 Points +56%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 306, n=147, last 2 years)
147.3 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)
127 Points +8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400X (118 - 119, n=2)
118.5 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo (Chrome 141)
118 Points
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F7 (Chrome 138.0.7204.168)
71781 Points +103%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 121337, n=200, last 2 years)
49133 Points +39%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400X (35354 - 41357, n=2)
38356 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)
38099 Points +8%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo (Chrome 141)
35354 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
23567 Points -33%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=155, last 2 years)
1149 ms * -12%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)
1031.23 ms * -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400X (1022 - 1038, n=2)
1030 ms * -1%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo (Chrome 141)
1021.8 ms *
Xiaomi Poco F7 (Chrome 138.0.7204.168)
534.1 ms * +48%

* ... smaller is better

Motorola Edge 60 NeoSamsung Galaxy A36 5GXiaomi Poco F7Motorola Edge 50 NeoAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
PCMark for Android
-12%
180%
-2%
8%
46%
Storage 2.0 seq. read int. (MB/s)
864 ?(3.0.4061)
845 ?(3.0.4061)
-2%
3242 ?(3.0.4061)
275%
874 ?(3.0.4061)
1%
Storage 2.0 seq. write int. (MB/s)
843 ?(3.0.4061)
480 ?(3.0.4061)
-43%
3377 ?(3.0.4061)
301%
835 ?(3.0.4061)
-1%
Storage 2.0 random read int. (MB/s)
51.1 ?(3.0.4061)
33.9 ?(3.0.4061)
-34%
49.1 ?(3.0.4061)
-4%
51.2 ?(3.0.4061)
0%
38.4 ?(24.9 - 57.4, n=27)
-25%
Storage 2.0 random write int. (MB/s)
82.5 ?(3.0.4061)
39 ?(3.0.4061)
-53%
62 ?(3.0.4061)
-25%
77.9 ?(3.0.4061)
-6%
Storage 2.0 (Points)
32735 ?(3.0.4061)
55507 ?(3.0.4061)
70%
148268 ?(3.0.4061)
353%
31677 ?(3.0.4061)
-3%

辐射 - 具有适度散热功能的摩托罗拉手机

温度

在持续负载的情况下,表面温度明显升高,但并不明显。尤其是在 3DMark 压力测试中,Edge 60 Neo 的废热并不明显。摩托罗拉智能手机只是略有节流或根本没有节流。

Max. Load
 46.5 °C45.7 °C40.3 °C 
 46.8 °C46.3 °C40.9 °C 
 46.8 °C44.9 °C39.4 °C 
Maximum: 46.8 °C
Average: 44.2 °C
38.5 °C41.8 °C42.1 °C
39 °C41.2 °C42.9 °C
40 °C42.3 °C45.3 °C
Maximum: 45.3 °C
Average: 41.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.1 °C | Room Temperature 19.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.3 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.4 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.4 % 0%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.3 %
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
76.3 % -23%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.6 % 0%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.4 %
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 % 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 5
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97.1 % -2%
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
78.6 % -21%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
78.5 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.1 %
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 % 0%
Xiaomi Poco F7
Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
79.8 % -19%
05101520Tooltip
Motorola Edge 60 Neo Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø6.15 (6.13-6.16)
Motorola Edge 50 Neo Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.15 (5.14-5.16)
Motorola Edge 60 Neo Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø22 (22-22.1)
Motorola Edge 50 Neo Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.9 (18.9-19)
Motorola Edge 60 Neo Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø3.06 (3.05-3.08)
Motorola Edge 50 Neo Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø2.59 (2.58-2.61)

发言人

立体声扬声器的声音几乎没有低音,但在同价位产品中基本上还算不错。粉红噪声"(Pink Noise)的中音有所提升,但高音也相当均匀。此外,还可通过 USB 端口或蓝牙 5.4 无线连接耳机。有多种音频编解码器可供选择。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.234.12529313123.321.34028.8285030.5346317.619809.4151009.928.312512.53616010.440.92001045.42508.349.33157.652.14006.553.25008.756.263015.66280012.263.3100011.669.7125010.869.716001068.320007.670.125006.867.631506.462.840006.766.450006.774.76300774.680007.272100007.565.3125007.675.9160007.666.3SPL21.482.1N0.349.8median 7.6median 65.3Delta1.88.946.446.246.140.138.83540.736.645.34234.530.830.123.53034.531.240.524.544.821.448.119.653.919.757.518.459.918.662.821.266.623.270.121.175.616.576.417.17816.577.716.17816.576.516.776.317.178.717.169.31773.316.975.816.778.415.866.930.7881.571.8median 17.1median 71.82.39.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Edge 60 NeoMotorola Edge 50 Neo
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Edge 60 Neo audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Motorola Edge 50 Neo audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - 可无线充电的廉价智能手机

能源消耗

Edge 60 Neo 配备 5,000 毫安时电池,可通过 USB-C 接口以 68 瓦的功率充电,或以 15 瓦的功率无线充电。在功耗测试中,这款配备了 Dimensity 7400、在耗电测试中,配备 Dimensity 7400 的中端手机被证明是相当经济的,整体能耗并不特别高。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.8 / 1.2 / 1.7 Watt
Load midlight 5.4 / 10.1 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco F7
6500 mAh
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400X
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-13%
-17%
-3%
-12%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)
0.8
0.86
-8%
1.18
-48%
Idle Average * (Watt)
1.2
1.75
-46%
1.44
-20%
1.405 ?(1.2 - 1.61, n=2)
-17%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)
1.7
1.82
-7%
1.48
13%
1.71 ?(1.7 - 1.72, n=2)
-1%
Load Average * (Watt)
5.4
5.31
2%
7.62
-41%
5.4 ?(n=1)
-0%
Load Maximum * (Watt)
10.1
10.95
-8%
8.92
12%
10.1 ?(n=1)
-0%

* ... smaller is better

功耗:Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678Tooltip
Motorola Edge 60 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7400X; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø2.9 (1.301-3.55)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.06 (1.135-8.9)
Motorola Edge 60 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7400X; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.91 (0.805-1.591)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.931 (0.834-1.294)

功耗:GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Motorola Edge 60 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7400X; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.63 (9.26-10.1)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.85 (8.38-8.89)
Motorola Edge 60 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7400X; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.91 (0.805-1.591)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.931 (0.834-1.294)

电池寿命

在实际条件下,Edge 60 Neo 在我们的 WLAN 测试中表现出了紧凑型手机的出色电池续航能力。与 Edge 50 Neo这款中档手机的续航时间超过 24 小时。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (C hrome 141)
24h 24min
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
5000 mAh
OnePlus Nord CE 5
5200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco F7
6500 mAh
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
4310 mAh
Battery runtime
WiFi v1.3 (h)
24.4
16.9
-31%
14.8
-39%
22.7
-7%
13.7
-44%

Notebookcheck 总体评分

摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Neo 不仅外观时尚,而且非常耐用。超长的电池续航时间和优质的功能使这款小巧的Android 手机成为价格敏感型买家的一个有趣选择。

Motorola Edge 60 Neo - 12/03/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
77 / 75 → 100%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
44 / 69 → 63%
Weight
91%
Battery
94%
Display
92%
Games Performance
16 / 55 → 29%
Application Performance
68 / 85 → 80%
AI Performance
57%
Temperature
85%
Noise
100%
Audio
77 / 90 → 86%
Camera
73%
Average
70%
80%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
30%
Packaging
85%
Power Use
96%
Repairability
76%
Software Updates
68.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 59.2%

可比较的替代品

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
79.5%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
Motorola Edge 60 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7400X ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $9.88
LXEEOLX Ultra-Thin Flexible ...
2. $9.85
Lyepetik [2 Pack] Hydrogel S...
3. $9.89
Silsewip [2pcs] Hydrogel Scr...
List Price: 399€
175 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.36"
2670x1200
460 PPI
pOLED
2.
80.8%
OnePlus Nord CE 5
OnePlus Nord CE 5
MediaTek Dimensity 8350 ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 128 GB 
Amazon: $605.00
List Price: 349€
199 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.77"
2392x1080
388 PPI
AMOLED
3.
78%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘
6 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $299.99
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G A Seri...
2. $269.40
SAMSUNG Galaxy A36 5G 2025 |...
3. $278.90
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G 2025 |...
List Price: 379€
195 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"
2340x1080
385 PPI
Super AMOLED
4.
85.2%
Xiaomi Poco F7
Xiaomi Poco F7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 825 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $579.99
XIAOMI Poco F7 PRO 5G + 4G L...
2. $339.50
XIAOMI Poco X7 PRO 5G + 4G L...
3. $11.99
Ibywind for Xiaomi Poco F7 5...
215.7 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.83"
2772x1280
447 PPI
AMOLED
5.
77.3%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $6.64
Natbok 2 Pack 3D Compatible ...
2. $4.99
Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...
3. 
CeiLarv 3 Pack for Motorola ...
List Price: 499€
171 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.40"
2670x1220
459 PPI
P-OLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 时尚廉价的高端智能手机 - 摩托罗拉 Edge 60 Neo 评测
Marcus Herbrich, 2025-12- 7 (Update: 2025-12- 7)