电池和显示屏更好，但三星Galaxy A36 仍是我们的最爱--小米 Poco M8 5G 评测

Name: Xiaomi Poco M8 5G
Brand: Xiaomi

买我吗？

明亮的显示屏、良好的电池续航能力和强大的功能：小米 Poco M8 5G 实际上做到了一切。如果不是因为恼人的竞争对手，小米 Poco M8 5G 几乎做到了一切。Poco 手机经常在与他们的竞争中处于下风。更糟糕的是，小米还在自相残杀，因为相同的智能手机目前至少可以用不同的名字以同样便宜的价格买到。
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 02/21/2026 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

小米 Poco M8 5G 总结

小米并没有让购买者轻易爱上 Poco M8 5G。如果你对智能手机的期望值不高，那么这款 6.77 英寸的设备是一款可靠的日常伴侣。但归根结底，它缺乏独特的卖点，无法从众多经济实惠的中端智能手机中脱颖而出。它最大的优势是高于平均水平的电池续航时间和明亮的 AMOLED 显示屏。

Test device courtesy of Xiaomi

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

不过，Poco M8 5G 不支持 eSIM 卡，Wi-Fi 5 的数据吞吐量也较弱。更新可持续到 2032 年，但考虑到骁龙 6 代 3 的速度已经不算快，你是否还想用这么长时间是另一个问题。

Pros

+ 明亮的 AMOLED 显示屏，120 Hz

+ 高频 PWM 调光

+ 做工精良

+ 出色的电池寿命

+ 充电功率 45 瓦

+ 立体声扬声器

+ 更新至 2032 年

Cons

- 仅限 WiFi 5

- 仅限混合双卡

- 不支持 eSIM

- SoC 速度慢

- 无超广角摄像头

价格和供应情况

小米 Poco M8 5G在小米的售价为 270 欧元（8/256 GB）或 300 欧元（8/512 GB）（分别约合人民币 314 元/353 元）。在其他网上商店，这两个版本的价格略低，例如亚马逊。

Anoowkoa 2 Pack for Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+/Note 15 Pro Plus 5G/Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro 3D Screen protector with Camera Lens protector Tempered Glass.9H Hardness.Anti-Fingerprint.No Air-Bubbles.Easy Installation
Natbok 2+2 Pack 3D Screen Protector for Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G / Note 15 Pro Plus 5G/Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro with Camera Lens Protector, 9H Tempered Glass Film,HD Clear Scratch Resistant,Bubble-Free
Natbok 2+2 Pack 3D Screen Protector for Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G/4G/Xiaomi Poco M8 with Camera Lens Protector,9H Tempered Glass Film,HD Clear Scratch Resistant,Bubble-Free

小米 Poco M8 5G 总结
规格
外壳和功能 - 采用 3D 设计的小米 Poco M8 5G
通信和操作 - WiFi 5 已经结束
软件与可持续性--2032 年之前的更新
相机 - 机上没有超广角相机
显示屏 - 3000 尼特高亮度 AMOLED 面板
性能、排放和电池寿命--采用硅技术的电池经久耐用
Notebookcheck 总体评分
可比较的替代品

优雅的 3D 设计、大容量电池、120 Hz 显示屏和骁龙 6 代 3作为控制中心：小米推出 Poco M8 5G 是在与自己竞争，因为它在技术上等同于小米Redmi Note 15 5G。因此，Poco 手机也应被推荐为经济实惠但配置精良的智能手机。

规格

Xiaomi Poco M8 5G (Poco M8 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, 4 x 2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A78, 4 x 1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55, Cortex-A78 / A55

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 710

Memory

8 GB

, LPDDR4X

Display

6.77 inch 19.9:9, 2392 x 1080 pixel 388 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, 3200 nits peak brightness, 800 nits typical brightness, Touch sampling rate 240 Hz, Instant touch sampling rate 2560 Hz, 3840 Hz PWM dimming, 12 Bit color depth, glossy: yes, 120 Hz

Storage

512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 512 GB

, 467 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Virtual proximity sensor, Accelerometer, Electronic compass, IR blaster, Gyroscope, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3, Wi-Fi Direct, USB-OTG

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (Band 2/3/5/8), 3G (Band 1/2/4/5/6/8/19), 4G (Band 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/18/19/20/26/28/38/40/41/42/48/66/71), 5G (Band n1/2/3/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41/48/66/71/77/78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.35 x 164 x 75.42

Battery

5520 mAh Lithium-Ion, 45W TurbiCharge, up to 18W reverse charging, silicon-carbon anode

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 15

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Light Fusion 400, f/1.8, 1/2.88" sensor size, 1.22 µm 4-in-1 pixel size) + 2 MP depth camera, video recording up to 4K@30fps
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f/2.2, 1/4" sensor size, video recording up to 1080p@30fps

Additional features

Speakers: stereo speakers (Dolby Atmos & Hi-Res Audio support), Keyboard: virtual, USB-C cable, Protective case, SIM tool, Quick start guide, Warranty Card, HyperOS 2.0, 12 Months Warranty, plastic back side; IP65 certified; GPS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1I, B1C), Galileo (E1); Connectivity: Hybrid-Dual-SIM, VoLTE/WiFI calling, no eSIM support; Bluetooth codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LDAC, LHDC V1-V5; no HDR support; update policy: 4 OS upgrades, 6 years of security updates (EOL 01/2032); Head SAR 0.997 W/kg, Body SAR 0.987 W/kg, fanless

Released

01/08/2026

Weight

178 g

Price

300 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

外壳和功能 - 采用 3D 设计的小米 Poco M8 5G

小米将 Poco M8 5G 装入坚固轻巧的塑料外壳中。圆润的长边使后盖和显示屏看起来天衣无缝。不过，出厂时贴上的屏幕保护膜起到了触觉制动的作用，因为弧形设计可以明显感觉到它的存在。

小米没有提供关于显示屏玻璃防护等级的任何信息。Poco M8 5G 的防尘防水等级为 IP65，这意味着它不会受到雨水等的伤害。接近传感器只是虚拟的，因此往往不如物理传感器精确。

混合 SIM 卡插槽可容纳最大 1 TB 的 microSD 卡。在使用 Angelbird AV Pro V60 microSD 参考卡进行的复制测试中，读卡器达到了平均每秒 32.3 MByte 的合理速度。

尺寸比较

Nothing Phone (3a) OnePlus Nord CE 5 Xiaomi Poco M8 5G Xiaomi Poco X7 Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G Samsung Galaxy A36 5G DIN A6 ❌

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	58.86 MB/s +82%
OnePlus Nord CE 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (Angelbird V60)	37.6 MB/s +16%
Average of class Smartphone (5.72 - 58.9, n=72, last 2 years)	32.4 MB/s 0%
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	32.31 MB/s

跨平台磁盘测试 (CPDT)

OnePlus Nord CE 5 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø30.1 (9.09-41.3)

Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø38.1 (26.6-46.5)

OnePlus Nord CE 5 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø64.9 (40.5-76)

Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø73.6 (14.8-83.3)

通信和操作 - WiFi 5 已经结束

Poco M8 5G 支持最快的 WiFi 通信标准 WiFi 5。因此，与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 连接后，小米手机只能达到低于平均水平的 WiFi 传输速率。

如果省略 microSD 卡，Poco M8 5G 只支持双卡双待。在测试中，这款智能手机的语音质量不错，并能在很大程度上屏蔽干扰环境的噪音。

电容式触摸屏对输入的响应速度很快，在测试中与下方的指纹传感器一样可靠。此外，您还可以使用 2D 面部解锁功能进行生物认证。ERM 振动电机负责触觉反馈，可分 3 级调节。

Networking
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	369 (min: 184) MBit/s ∼39%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	353 (min: 309) MBit/s ∼30%
Nothing Phone (3a) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	938 (min: 466) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	831 (min: 777) MBit/s ∼70%
OnePlus Nord CE 5 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	536 (min: 421) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1191 (min: 961) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	860 (min: 440) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	752 (min: 713) MBit/s ∼63%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	373 (min: 359) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	365 (min: 359) MBit/s ∼31%
Xiaomi Poco X7 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	398 (min: 193) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	377 (min: 187) MBit/s ∼32%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	338 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼36%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	330 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼28%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	687 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	719 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼60%

Xiaomi Poco M8 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø363 (184-379)

Samsung Galaxy A36 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø845 (440-918)

Xiaomi Poco M8 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø351 (309-365)

Samsung Galaxy A36 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø750 (713-779)

软件与可持续性--2032 年之前的更新

小米为 Poco M8 5G 推出的 HyperOS 2.0 操作系统仍基于Android 15，在许多地方显示广告，并附带大量臃肿软件。小米计划为 Poco M8 5G 提供四个Android 更新，并在 2032 年 1 月之前为其提供安全更新。.

Poco M8 5G 的包装由再生纸制成，但在交付时采用塑料薄膜收缩包装。制造商没有提供任何有关该智能手机所使用回收材料的信息。小米还提供工具和备件Poco M8 5G 的工具和备件。

相机 - 机上没有超广角相机

自拍摄像头的分辨率相当高，达到 2000 万像素。不过，其图像质量非常一般，有时由于明显的锐化效果而显得有些做作。不过，偶尔进行视频聊天时，质量还是可以的，最高可达到 1080p，每秒 30 帧。

主摄像头传感器的分辨率为 5000 万像素，采用 Light Fusion 400 技术，在日光下拍摄的照片还算可以。不过，它显示的细节不多，变焦级别越高越模糊。视频录制的画质大致相同，最高可达每秒 30 帧的 4K。

由于 Poco M8 5G 没有超广角摄像头，这在很大程度上限制了它的拍照能力。额外的摄像头只包括一个 200 万像素的摄像头，仅用于捕捉深度信息。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight Daylight 5x zoom Low light

click to load images

Xiaomi Poco M8 5G

Canon EOS 90D

Honor 400

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro

click to load images

Xiaomi Poco M8 5G

Canon EOS 90D

Honor 400

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro

click to load images

Xiaomi Poco M8 5G

Canon EOS 90D

Honor 400

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro

click to load images

Xiaomi Poco M8 5G

Canon EOS 90D

Honor 400

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro

ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco M8 5G: 11.5 ∆E min: 3.43 - max: 17.27 ∆E

显示屏 - 3000 尼特高亮度 AMOLED 面板

据小米称，120 Hz AMOLED 面板的峰值亮度达到 3200 尼特，在较小的图像部分（APL18 测量值为 3355 cd/m²）和 HDR 中也能达到 3492 cd/m²。此外，精确的色彩还原和 3840 Hz 的高 PWM 调光频率也为其锦上添花。

Poco M8 的峰值亮度很高，因此非常适合户外使用。不过，在测试中，我们是否启动阳光模式并无区别。实际上，这应该会带来亮度提升，但并不会改变显示亮度。


966 cd/m²	957 cd/m²	966 cd/m²
963 cd/m²	953 cd/m²	971 cd/m²
941 cd/m²	924 cd/m²	947 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 971 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 954.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2.56 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 953 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.76}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
96.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
CCT: 6694 K

	Xiaomi Poco M8 5G AMOLED, 2392x1080, 6.8"	Nothing Phone (3a) AMOLED, 2392x1080, 6.8"	OnePlus Nord CE 5 AMOLED, 2392x1080, 6.8"	Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"	Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"	Xiaomi Poco X7 AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Screen		-71%	1%	-17%	4%	-1%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	953	1287 35%	1315 38%	1127 18%	1157 21%	1156 21%
Brightness (cd/m²)	954	1274 34%	1300 36%	1137 19%	1151 21%	1150 21%
Brightness Distribution (%)	95	97 2%	97 2%	98 3%	97 2%	98 3%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1	1.9 -90%	1.22 -22%	1.8 -80%	1.1 -10%	1.1 -10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.3	8.7 -278%	2.7 -17%	2.8 -22%	2.4 -4%	3.1 -35%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.5	3.4 -127%	2 -33%	2.1 -40%	1.6 -7%	1.6 -7%
Gamma	2.22 ^99%	2.26 ^97%	2.258 ^97%	2.11 ^104%	2.21 ^100%	2.22 ^99%
CCT	6694 ^97%	7072 ^92%	6503 ^100%	6466 ^101%	6622 ^98%	6304 ^103%

* ... smaller is better

Display: APL18 Peak Brightness | HDR Peak Brightness

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1877 cd/m²
Nothing Phone (3a) Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1202 cd/m²
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1163 cd/m²
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1156 cd/m²

Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2563 cd/m²
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2118 cd/m²
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2012 cd/m²
Nothing Phone (3a) Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1179 cd/m²

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

60 Hz
Amplitude: 14.15 %
Secondary Frequency: 3846 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8013 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
0.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.461 ms rise
0.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.4415 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.1 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.04 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.465 ms rise
1.04 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.5745 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.4 ms).

性能、排放和电池寿命--采用硅技术的电池经久耐用

配备骁龙 6 代 3Poco M8 5G 的运行速度并不快，但在运行过程中仍会出现发热现象。SoC 处理能力不足以应付复杂的应用程序，如果您想经常使用这款智能手机，最好选择 OnePlus Nord CE 5为例。

立体声扬声器可提供典型的高音重智能手机音效，在中等音量下效果最佳。USB-C 和蓝牙可用于外部声音输出。

5520 mAh 电池有助于 Poco M8 5G 实现高于平均水平的续航时间。在 WLAN 测试中，只有 Nothing Phone (3a)更持久。使用合适的电源适配器，小米手机的充电功率可达 45 瓦。在测试中，完全充电周期仅需不到 1.5 小时。

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3883, n=209, last 2 years)	1737 Points +70%
OnePlus Nord CE 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192	1325 Points +29%
Nothing Phone (3a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288	1171 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	1033 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	1030 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192	1024 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (999 - 1033, n=5)	1017 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288	959 Points -6%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone (830 - 11634, n=209, last 2 years)	5111 Points +73%
OnePlus Nord CE 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192	4201 Points +42%
Nothing Phone (3a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288	3250 Points +10%
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192	2960 Points
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	2955 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (2887 - 2963, n=5)	2942 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	2908 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288	2299 Points -22%

3DMark
Wild Life Score
Nothing Phone (3a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288	3998 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	3484 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (3034 - 3484, n=5)	3269 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192	3266 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	3141 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (270 - 13896, n=102, last 2 years)	2872 Points -12%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288	Points -100%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Smartphone (271 - 30621, n=190, last 2 years)	11047 Points +236%
OnePlus Nord CE 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192	9956 Points +203%
Nothing Phone (3a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288	4186 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	3502 Points +7%
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192	3288 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (3069 - 3502, n=5)	3287 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	3129 Points -5%
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Smartphone (61 - 8140, n=192, last 2 years)	2900 Points +236%
OnePlus Nord CE 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192	2774 Points +221%
Nothing Phone (3a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288	1057 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	907 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192	863 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (801 - 907, n=5)	862 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	846 Points -2%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone (62 - 8102, n=191, last 2 years)	2883 Points +238%
OnePlus Nord CE 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192	2795 Points +228%
Nothing Phone (3a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288	1063 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	901 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (793 - 901, n=5)	856 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192	852 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	842 Points -1%

GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192	69 fps +123%
Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 166, n=205, last 2 years)	58.6 fps +89%
Nothing Phone (3a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288	46 fps +48%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	39 fps +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (30 - 39, n=5)	32.4 fps +5%
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192	31 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	28 fps -10%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288	19 fps -39%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192	118 fps +181%
Average of class Smartphone (3.4 - 367, n=205, last 2 years)	116.7 fps +178%
Nothing Phone (3a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288	52 fps +24%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	44 fps +5%
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192	42 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (36 - 44, n=5)	40.4 fps -4%
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	40 fps -5%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288	20 fps -52%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=206, last 2 years)	47.1 fps +124%
OnePlus Nord CE 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192	47 fps +124%
Nothing Phone (3a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288	28 fps +33%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	23 fps +10%
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192	21 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (19 - 23, n=5)	20.6 fps -2%
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	17 fps -19%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288	11 fps -48%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192	49 fps +227%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 146, n=205, last 2 years)	44.9 fps +199%
Nothing Phone (3a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288	20 fps +33%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	16 fps +7%
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	15 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192	15 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (13 - 16, n=5)	14.6 fps -3%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288	6.9 fps -54%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192	21 fps +218%
Average of class Smartphone (0.54 - 62, n=206, last 2 years)	20.7 fps +214%
Nothing Phone (3a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288	8.8 fps +33%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	7.1 fps +8%
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192	6.6 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (5.9 - 7.1, n=5)	6.52 fps -1%
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	6.5 fps -2%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288	2.9 fps -56%

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
OnePlus Nord CE 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192	1112 Points +804%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5210, n=78, last 2 years)	692 Points +463%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (123 - 138, n=3)	132.7 Points +8%
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192	123 Points
Half Precision NPU 1.5
OnePlus Nord CE 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192	4496 Points +3555%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 36297, n=78, last 2 years)	2726 Points +2116%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (123 - 141, n=3)	134 Points +9%
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192	123 Points
Quantized NPU 1.5
OnePlus Nord CE 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192	4547 Points +1195%
Average of class Smartphone (133 - 49889, n=78, last 2 years)	4038 Points +1050%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (351 - 398, n=3)	380 Points +8%
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192	351 Points

CrossMark
Overall
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2856, n=115, last 2 years)	1150 Points +44%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	877 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (737 - 877, n=4)	813 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192	796 Points
Nothing Phone (3a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288	785 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	759 Points -5%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288	597 Points -25%
Productivity
Average of class Smartphone (198 - 2366, n=115, last 2 years)	1066 Points +63%
Nothing Phone (3a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288	847 Points +30%
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	837 Points +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (654 - 810, n=4)	718 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	717 Points +10%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288	667 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192	654 Points
Creativity
Average of class Smartphone (163 - 2123, n=115, last 2 years)	962 Points +66%
Nothing Phone (3a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288	692 Points +20%
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	654 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	606 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (579 - 630, n=4)	604 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192	579 Points
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288	487 Points -16%
Responsiveness
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	4856 Points +30%
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192	3728 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (893 - 4856, n=4)	3414 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (239 - 13042, n=115, last 2 years)	3109 Points -17%
Nothing Phone (3a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288	909 Points -76%
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	886 Points -76%
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288	767 Points -79%

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Nothing Phone (3a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288	161.602 Points +38%
Average of class Smartphone (23.8 - 358, n=141, last 2 years)	152.1 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	131.654 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (117 - 147.8, n=4)	130.7 Points +12%
OnePlus Nord CE 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192	122.3 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192	116.992 Points
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 12288	108.784 Points -7%
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	87.225 Points -25%

	Xiaomi Poco M8 5G	Nothing Phone (3a)	OnePlus Nord CE 5	Samsung Galaxy A36 5G	Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G	Xiaomi Poco X7	Average 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		19%	15%	-27%	15%	-16%	10%	83%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)	1042.73	1031.34 -1%	1235 18%	968.34 -7%	987.81 -5%	947.4 -9%	1026 ?(529 - 1860, n=13) -2%	2148 ?(270 - 4370, n=197, last 2 years) 106%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)	893.75	1001.28 12%	795 -11%	166.77 -81%	943.43 6%	915.23 2%	936 ?(499 - 1612, n=13) 5%	1848 ?(103.2 - 4051, n=197, last 2 years) 107%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)	146.5	245.48 68%	222 52%	233.98 60%	243.98 67%	100.16 -32%	218 ?(100.2 - 337, n=13) 49%	295 ?(47.6 - 614, n=197, last 2 years) 101%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)	294.99	285.24 -3%	302 2%	62.58 -79%	265.26 -10%	226.88 -23%	255 ?(186.1 - 390, n=13) -14%	347 ?(9.4 - 987, n=197, last 2 years) 18%

Max. Load

Idle


44.5 °C	42.4 °C	38.2 °C
42.8 °C	42.2 °C	37.3 °C
42.4 °C	40.4 °C	36.4 °C

Maximum: 44.5 °C
Average: 40.7 °C


37.1 °C	38.7 °C	40 °C
35.6 °C	38.8 °C	39.7 °C
33.8 °C	37.5 °C	38.7 °C

Maximum: 40 °C
Average: 37.8 °C

Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.5 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Nothing Phone (3a) Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.6 % +1%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.4 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.4 % 0%
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Nothing Phone (3a) Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.8 % +1%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.6 % 0%
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.2 %
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99 % 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 5 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	97.1 % -2%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Nothing Phone (3a) Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.3 % 0%
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.1 %
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	98.6 % -1%

Xiaomi Poco M8 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø5.17 (5.15-5.19)

Nothing Phone (3a) Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø6.28 (6.27-6.29)

OnePlus Nord CE 5 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø18.1 (17.7-18.2)

Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.42 (5.38-5.44)

Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.06 (5.05-5.07)

Xiaomi Poco M8 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø19.5 (19.3-19.5)

Nothing Phone (3a) Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø23.8 (23.8-23.9)

Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø20.7 (20.6-20.8)

Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.7 (18.7-18.8)

Xiaomi Poco M8 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø19.7 (19.6-19.7)

Nothing Phone (3a) Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø24.7 (24.7-25)

Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø20.8 (20.7-20.9)

Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.7 (18.7-18.8)

Xiaomi Poco M8 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø2.26 (2.26-2.28)

Nothing Phone (3a) Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø2.81 (2.8-2.81)

Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø2.56 (2.54-2.57)

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Poco M8 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 10.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A36 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 144.0.7559.132)		19h 18min

Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3
Xiaomi Poco M8 5G 5520 mAh	19.3 h
Nothing Phone (3a) 5000 mAh	20.6 h
OnePlus Nord CE 5 5200 mAh	16.9 h
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G 5000 mAh	14.8 h
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G 5110 mAh	17.4 h
Xiaomi Poco X7 5110 mAh	17.5 h

Notebookcheck 总体评分

小米 Poco M8 5G 无疑为那些想花很少钱购买智能手机的买家提供了很好的选择。不过，三星Galaxy A36 5G 等竞争对手的性价比更高。

Back to the verdict

Xiaomi Poco M8 5G - 02/19/2026 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

86%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

90%

Connectivity

45 / 69 → 65%

Weight

91%

Battery

92%

Display

89%

Games Performance

14 / 55 → 25%

Application Performance

62 / 85 → 73%

AI Performance

Temperature

88%

Noise

100%

Audio

74 / 90 → 82%

Camera

57%

Average

62%

76%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
0%

Packaging
50%

Power Use
96.1%

Repairability
60%

Software Updates
89%

Total Sustainability Score: 49.2%

可比较的替代品

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 76.3%	Xiaomi Poco M8 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 2.1	Amazon: 1. Anoowkoa 2 Pack for Xiaomi R... 2. Natbok 2+2 Pack 3D Screen Pr... 3. Natbok 2+2 Pack 3D Screen Pr... List Price: 300€	178 g	512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.77" 2392x1080 388 PPI AMOLED
2. 79.2%	Nothing Phone (3a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: 1. Nothing Phone (3) Cell Phone... 2. Nothing Phone (3) Cell Phone... 3. JETech Screen Protector for ...	201 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.77" 2392x1080 387 PPI AMOLED
3. 80.8%	OnePlus Nord CE 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8350 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB	Amazon: List Price: 349€	199 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.77" 2392x1080 388 PPI AMOLED
4. 78%	Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘ 6 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: 1. Samsung Galaxy A36 5G A Seri... 2. SAMSUNG Galaxy A36 5G 2025 \|... 3. Samsung Galaxy A36 5G 2025 \|... List Price: 379€	195 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70" 2340x1080 385 PPI Super AMOLED
5. 76.1%	Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025 ⎘ IMG BXM-8-256 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1	Amazon: 1. Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco M7 P... 2. Ibywind Screen Protector For... 3. XIAOMI Poco X7 PRO 5G + 4G L... List Price: 240€	190 g	256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.67" 2400x1080 395 PPI AMOLED
6. 77.7%	Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 2.1	Amazon: 1. XIAOMI Poco X7 PRO 5G + 4G L... 2. XIAOMI Poco X7 PRO 5G + 4G L... 3. Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco X7 P...	185.5 g	512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.67" 2712x1220 446 PPI AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!

电池和显示屏更好，但三星Galaxy A36 仍是我们的最爱--小米 Poco M8 5G 评测

买我吗？

小米 Poco M8 5G 总结

Pros

Cons

价格和供应情况

Table of Contents

规格

外壳和功能 - 采用 3D 设计的小米 Poco M8 5G

尺寸比较

跨平台磁盘测试 (CPDT)

通信和操作 - WiFi 5 已经结束

软件与可持续性--2032 年之前的更新

相机 - 机上没有超广角相机

显示屏 - 3000 尼特高亮度 AMOLED 面板

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能、排放和电池寿命--采用硅技术的电池经久耐用

3DMark 压力测试

Xiaomi Poco M8 5G audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy A36 5G audio analysis

Notebookcheck 总体评分

可比较的替代品

Transparency

More articles related to this device

Related Articles