华为 Pura 80 Ultra 智能手机评测：妥协的相机怪兽

Name: Huawei Pura 80 Ultra
Brand: Huawei

有很多光，但也有很多阴影。

可移动的超大相机传感器、9.4 倍光学变焦、无论白天黑夜都能拍出出色的照片--华为 Pura 80 Ultra 专为摄影爱好者打造，在这一目标群体中几乎没有竞争对手。不过，华为这款售价 1400 欧元的巨型手机也存在不少缺陷，因此只适合作为一款有限制条件的日常智能手机。
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 01/26/2026 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android Smartphone Touchscreen Wi-Fi 7

华为 Pura 80 Ultra 的评价

摄像头是华为 Pura 80 Ultra 的旗舰功能，这也正是这款顶级智能手机在我们的评测中赢得最多荣誉的地方。它的摄像头堪称目前智能手机中的佼佼者。

因此，华为手机是Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max 或三星Galaxy S25 Ultra 等竞争对手的真正替代品。

Test device courtesy of Huawei Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

然而，只关注摄像头意味着其他方面被忽视了。我们的主要批评意见是，海思麒麟 9020 的性能不符合旗舰机的标准，谷歌服务只能以迂回的方式在基于Android-12 的 EMUI 15 上运行，而且甚至不提供 5G 连接。

Pros

+ 非常好的相机

+ 高质量外壳

+ IP69

+ 明亮的 LPTO OLED 显示屏

+ WiFi 7 和 eSIM

+ 充电功率高达 100 W

+ (反向）无线充电

Cons

- 相当重

- 电池寿命低于平均水平

- 作为一款高端手机，速度较慢

- 无 5G

- 无 6 GHz 无线局域网

- 无本地 Google Play 商店

价格和供应情况

在德国，如果直接从华为公司购买，Pura 80 Ultra 的价格为 1,399 欧元。其他地方的价格不会便宜多少。此外，华为这款相机巨无霸的优惠也是少之又少。

$15.99
AKABEILA [3 Pack Privacy Screen Protector for Huawei Pura 80 Ultra Privacy Glass Full Coverage Anti Spy Tempered Glass Protective Film
$7.99
Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible with Huawei Pura 80 Ultra Screen Protector Tempered Glass, Case Friendly [Hardness 9H ][High definition] [Anti Scratch]
$9.89
UYRUREL Screen Protector for HUAWEI Pura 80 Ultra Phone, High-definition Scratch Resistant Soft Film,HD Clear, Bubble Free with Easy Installation Kit, 2 Pack

华为 Pura 80 Ultra 的评价
规格
表壳：重量级，表面高光处理
特点大量内存和 USB-C 3.2
软件：EMUI 15 操作系统基于Android 12
通信与全球导航卫星系统：没有 5G 的旗舰智能手机
电话功能和通话质量
相机：性能非常强大
配件和保修：包装内有很多
输入设备和操作：电源按钮上的指纹传感器
显示屏正如承诺的那样，亮度高达 3,000 尼特
性能配备海思 SoC 的 Pura 80 Ultra
排放：尽管性能适中，但节流严重
电池寿命：100 瓦快速充电
Notebookcheck 对华为 Pura 80 Ultra 的总体印象
潜在替代品比较

华为表示，Pura 80 Ultra 可拍摄出色的照片。相机智能手机旗舰的功能令人印象深刻。华为 Pura 80 Ultra 售价 1399 欧元，其功能令人印象深刻。除了主摄像头的 1 英寸传感器外，还有一个可移动的 1/1.28 英寸传感器的双长焦摄像头，因此摄影师可以用四个后置摄像头来捕捉拍摄对象。

在这篇评测中，我们将看看 Pura 80 Ultra 的照片拍摄效果到底如何，画质是否能与 Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max或三星Galaxy S25 Ultra.

规格

Huawei Pura 80 Ultra (Pura 80 Series)

Processor

HiSilicon Kirin 9020 12 x 1.6 - 2.5 GHz, HiSilicon Main, Mid

Graphics adapter

HiSilicon Maleoon 920

Memory

16 GB

, LPDDR5X

Display

6.80 inch 20:9, 2848 x 1276 pixel 460 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, OLED, LTPO OLED 1-120 Hz, brightness up to 3000 nits, 1440 Hz high frequency PWM dimming, up to 300 Hz touch sampling rate, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB

, 478 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Gravity Sensor, Infrared Sensor, Fingerprint Sensor, Hall sensor, Gyroscope, Compass, Proximity Sensor, Laser Sensor, Colour Temperature Sensor, Gesture Sensor, Barometric pressure sensor, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Limited, USB-OTG

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (Band 2/3/5/8), 3G (Band 1/2/4/5/6/8/19), 4G (Band 1/2/3/4/5/6/7/8/9/12/13/17/18/19/20/25/26/28/32/34/38/39/40/41/42/66), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.3 x 163 x 76.1

Battery

5170 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 100W max. charging speed, 80W max. wireless charging speed

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 12

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.6-4.0, 22.5mm, OIS) + 50MP telephoto (3.7x optical zoom, f/2.4, 83mm, OIS) + 12.5MP telephoto (9.4x optical zoom, f/3.6, 212mm, OIS) + 40MP ultrawide (f/2.2, 13mm), video recording up to 4K@60fps
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.0, AF, video recording up to 4K@60fps

Additional features

Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, 100W charger, USB-C cable (USB 2.0), protective case, quick start guide, warranty card, SIM tool, EMUI 15, 24 Months Warranty, aluminium frame, glass back panel, screen protected by 2nd gen. Crystal Armour Kunlun glass; IP68/IP69 certified; GPS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1I, B1C, B2a, B2b), Galileo (E1, E5a, E5b), QZSS (L1, L5), NavIC (L5); Connectivity: Dual Nano SIM, eSIM support, VoLTE/WiFI calling; Bluetooth codecs: SBC, AAC, LDAC, L2HC (Huawei Low Latency High-Quality Codec); HDR support: HDR10, HLG, HDR Vivid, fanless, waterproof

Weight

233.5 g, Power Supply: 135 g

Price

1399 Euro

Links

Huawei homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

表壳：重量级，表面高光处理

从外观上看，6.8 英寸的华为 Pura 80 Ultra 与它的姊妹机型 Pura 80 Pro 非常相似。 Pura 80 Pro.工艺精湛的玻璃外壳传递出极高的颜值，所采用的第二代晶铠昆仑玻璃通过了 IP68/69 防尘防水认证。

不过，黑色和金色款式的 Pura 80 Ultra 采用了高光表面处理，容易留下指纹。重量也不容忽视。Pura 80 Ultra 重量不到 234 克，相当厚重，最厚处达到 15.7 毫米。

尺寸比较

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Huawei Pura 80 Ultra Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Honor Magic8 Pro Google Pixel 10 Pro DIN A6 ❌

特点大量内存和 USB-C 3.2

华为 Pura 80 Ultra 仅提供 16 GB 内存和 512 GB 存储空间的配置。机身上有红外传感器、Wi-Fi 7 和支持 USB OTG 和有线图像输出的 USB-C 3.2 端口。

通过三星便携式固态硬盘 T7 外置固态硬盘，USB-C 端口在拷贝测试中实现了 245 MB/s 的良好数据吞吐量。

软件：EMUI 15 操作系统基于Android 12

华为 Pura 80 Ultra 依赖其内部操作系统 EMUI 15，而 EMUI 15 仍基于 OpenAndroid 12。除了谷歌服务外，它还缺少谷歌 Play Store，这意味着用户只能依靠预装的应用库进行软件更新。

用户仍可通过极光商店访问完整的 Play 商店库。我们将在本文.

根据华为的说法，Pura 80 Ultra 将在五年内接受更新，这也符合欧盟的要求。安全更新应每月发布.

可持续性

华为没有提供任何有关可持续发展的数据，但提到了其系统的可持续发展管理系统，该系统以 ISO 26000 等标准为基础。华为还提供电子废弃物回收计划。

在 Pura 80 Ultra 的包装上，华为使用的纸张来自负责任管理的森林，并获得了 FSC Mix 认证。

通信与全球导航卫星系统：没有 5G 的旗舰智能手机

Pura 80 Ultra 的通信功能较弱。虽然它拥有 Wi-Fi 7，但由于我们参考的华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 路由器不支持 6 GHz 频段，因此只能达到三位数 Mbit/s 的传输速率。

此外，它还只有蓝牙 5.2，完全没有 5G，这大大限制了它的日常使用。

Networking
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	943 (min: 480) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	929 (min: 836) MBit/s ∼62%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	910 (min: 769) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	459 (min: 411) MBit/s ∼31%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1375 (min: 1300) MBit/s ∼74%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1180 (min: 1117) MBit/s ∼68%
Honor Magic8 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	976 (min: 951) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	580 (min: 475) MBit/s ∼39%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1856 (min: 1812) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	791 (min: 773) MBit/s ∼45%
Google Pixel 10 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	928 (min: 844) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	916 (min: 903) MBit/s ∼61%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1571 MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1742 (min: 1566) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1806 (min: 1767) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1494 (min: 744) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1747 (min: 798) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1483 (min: 1289) MBit/s ∼85%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	989 (min: 488) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	946 (min: 814) MBit/s ∼63%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	942 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1051 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1280 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1447 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼83%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	702 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼39%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	727 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1302 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1381 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼79%

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1375 (1300-1419)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1720 (798-1853)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1180 (1117-1218)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1483 (1289-1530)

Huawei Pura 80 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø928 (480-982)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø910 (769-1042)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1806 (1767-1846)

Huawei Pura 80 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø929 (836-950)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø459 (411-477)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1468 (744-1523)

Pura 80 Ultra 使用双频 GPS 定位。在测试中，它的定位精度几乎与以 GPS 定位精度高而著称的 Garmin Venu2 智能手表不相上下。

在全球版本中，Pura 80 Ultra 缺少中国的卫星 SOS 系统。

电话功能和通话质量

Pura 80 Ultra 可容纳两张 nano SIM 卡，但也可以激活 eSIM 卡。该智能手机还提供单 SIM 卡型号。

在拨打固定电话和移动网络电话时，通话者的声音听起来自然而清晰。

相机：性能非常强大

Pura 80 Ultra 采用 1 英寸规格的 5000 万像素主传感器，在目前的智能手机摄像头中处于领先地位。此外还有一个 4000 万像素超广角摄像头和两个 OIS 稳定长焦摄像头。它们的分辨率分别为 5000 万像素和 1250 万像素，共用一个可移动的 1/1.28 英寸传感器，可实现高达 9.4 倍（83 毫米至 212 毫米）的光学变焦。

这两款相机是市场上最好的相机之一，由于焦距范围大，使用起来非常灵活。超高的图像清晰度和高动态范围得到了保证，由于采用了大尺寸图像传感器，照片在夜间也不会变差。

1300 万像素自拍摄像头与背面的四分之一摄像头相比并不逊色，因为它也能拍摄出非常出色的照片。不过，与主摄像头一样，它只能拍摄每秒最多 60 帧的 4K 视频。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight Daylight Ultra-wide angle 5x Zoom Low light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

配件和保修：包装内有很多

华为智能手机随附一个 100 W 电源适配器、一条 USB-C 连接线、一个保护盖、一份快速入门指南、一个 SIM 卡工具和一张保修卡。

Pura 80 Ultra 在欧洲享有24 个月的保修服务。在欧洲。

输入设备和操作：电源按钮上的指纹传感器

麒麟 9020 麒麟 9020从旗舰机的标准来看，这并不是一个非常强大的 SoC，但它却能帮助 Pura 80 Ultra 流畅运行。由于采用了 300 Hz 采样率，触摸屏能快速识别输入，线性振动电机也能提供清晰的反馈。

与高端智能手机不同的是，指纹传感器并不位于显示屏下方，而是集成在电源按钮上。

不过，它的解锁速度快且流畅，因此没有什么可抱怨的。

显示屏正如承诺的那样，亮度高达 3,000 尼特

6.8 英寸 LPTO 显示屏的可变刷新率高达 120 Hz。正如华为所承诺的，它的峰值亮度可达 3,000 cd/m²。我们测量的 SDR 内容（APL18）亮度高达 3,319 cd/m²，HDR 亮度最高达 3,671 cd/m²。

在我们测量的所有亮度水平下，OLED 面板都会以 360 Hz 的频率闪烁。与此同时，为了减轻 PWM 闪烁给敏感用户带来的负面影响，还采用了相当高的调光频率 1,428 Hz（根据华为的说法是 1,440 Hz）。


1614 cd/m²	1632 cd/m²	1623 cd/m²
1584 cd/m²	1639 cd/m²	1634 cd/m²
1558 cd/m²	1612 cd/m²	1608 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1639 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1611.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.78 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 1639 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.8 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.77}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
CCT: 6915 K

	Huawei Pura 80 Ultra OLED, 2848x1276, 6.8"	Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max OLED, 2868x1320, 6.9"	Honor Magic8 Pro OLED, 2808x1256, 6.7"	Google Pixel 10 Pro OLED, 2856x1280, 6.3"	Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.9"	Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra AMOLED, 2608x1200, 6.9"
Screen		2%	21%	43%	-16%	18%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	1639	1054 -36%	1809 10%	2161 32%	1357 -17%	1771 8%
Brightness (cd/m²)	1612	1059 -34%	1821 13%	2198 36%	1350 -16%	1773 10%
Brightness Distribution (%)	95	93 -2%	95 0%	94 -1%	94 -1%	99 4%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.8	1.57 13%	1.2 33%	0.7 61%	3.1 -72%	1.3 28%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.1	2.8 32%	2.9 29%	1.8 56%	4.7 -15%	2.8 32%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.9	1.7 41%	1.8 38%	0.8 72%	2.2 24%	2.1 28%
Gamma	2.28 ^96%	2.32 ^95%	2.22 ^99%	2.19 ^100%	2 ^110%	2.25 ^98%
CCT	6915 ^94%	6993 ^93%	6446 ^101%	6646 ^98%	6391 ^102%	6452 ^101%

* ... smaller is better

Display: APL18 Peak Brightness | HDR Peak Brightness

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3519 cd/m² +6%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3319 cd/m²
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3233 cd/m² -3%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3199 cd/m² -4%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2613 cd/m² -21%

Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6045 cd/m² +65%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3671 cd/m²
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3458 cd/m² -6%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3207 cd/m² -13%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2768 cd/m² -25%

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

360 Hz
Amplitude: 16.58 %
Secondary Frequency: 1428 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 360 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 360 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8070 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）

用户可以使用 "正常 "和"鲜艳"色彩模式调节显示屏的色彩再现。色温也可以使用色轮或标准、暖色和冷色预设值进行设置。

如果将一切都保留在标准设置中（正常色彩模式、标准色温），华为手机就会为你带来非常准确的色彩还原。

ColorChecker （色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
0.77 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.434 ms rise
0.77 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.3405 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.79 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.382 ms rise
0.79 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.4055 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.5 ms).

华为 Pura 80 Ultra 在户外给人留下了非常好的印象。虽然其视角稳定的 OLED 面板没有使用防反射玻璃，但由于亮度高，在任何时候都非常易于阅读。

性能配备海思 SoC 的 Pura 80 Ultra

华为 Pura 80 Ultra 采用了海思麒麟 9020芯片。然而，正如下面的合成基准测试所示，它的性能甚至不足以让旗舰竞争产品感到尴尬。

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	3883 Points +202%
Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	3718 Points +189%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	3676 Points +186%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	3200 Points +149%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	2308 Points +80%
Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3883, n=208, last 2 years)	1781 Points +39%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (1278 - 1586, n=3)	1383 Points +8%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 16384	1285 Points
Multi-Core
Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	11301 Points +151%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	11004 Points +144%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	10020 Points +122%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	10017 Points +122%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	6314 Points +40%
Average of class Smartphone (830 - 11634, n=208, last 2 years)	5208 Points +16%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (4501 - 4938, n=3)	4648 Points +3%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 16384	4505 Points

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	2750094 Points +133%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	2629691 Points +123%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	2262067 Points +92%
Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 3269237, n=145, last 2 years)	1498019 Points +27%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	1338955 Points +14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (1178219 - 1205616, n=2)	1191918 Points +1%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 16384	1178219 Points

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	22179 Points +56%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	20764 Points +46%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	18445 Points +30%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	15738 Points +11%
Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=181, last 2 years)	14891 Points +5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (14209 - 14593, n=2)	14401 Points +1%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 16384	14209 Points

CrossMark - Overall
Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	2722 Points
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	2598 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	2354 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (n=1)	1209 Points
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2722, n=118, last 2 years)	1171 Points

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	15734 Points +110%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	14678 Points +96%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	13325 Points +78%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	8446 Points +13%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 16690, n=145, last 2 years)	7794 Points +4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (7087 - 8075, n=3)	7546 Points +1%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 16384	7477 Points
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	Points -100%
System
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	20996 Points +103%
Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	20150 Points +94%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	17171 Points +66%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	12881 Points +24%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 21153, n=145, last 2 years)	11594 Points +12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (10361 - 12221, n=3)	10982 Points +6%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 16384	10361 Points
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	Points -100%
Memory
Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	22887 Points +180%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	18501 Points +127%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	17355 Points +113%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 24052, n=145, last 2 years)	8880 Points +9%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 16384	8160 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (6574 - 8750, n=3)	7828 Points -4%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	7257 Points -11%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	Points -100%
Graphics
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	51530 Points +149%
Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	51366 Points +148%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	45562 Points +120%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	30035 Points +45%
Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 384996, n=145, last 2 years)	26488 Points +28%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 16384	20731 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (20494 - 20791, n=3)	20672 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	Points -100%
Web
Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	2587 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	2322 Points +30%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	2319 Points +30%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (1783 - 1940, n=3)	1839 Points +3%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	1813 Points +2%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 16384	1783 Points
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 2587, n=145, last 2 years)	1711 Points -4%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	Points -100%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	23281 Points +126%
Average of class Smartphone (3769 - 81594, n=129, last 2 years)	19714 Points +92%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	19236 Points +87%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	17652 Points +72%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (10280 - 12951, n=2)	11616 Points +13%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 16384	10280 Points

AImark - Score v3.x
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	37611 Points +1185%
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=115, last 2 years)	23311 Points +696%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 16384	2928 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (2910 - 2928, n=2)	2919 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	1923 Points -34%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	1477 Points -50%

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	5155 Points +1394%
Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	843 Points +144%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5210, n=69, last 2 years)	746 Points +116%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	559 Points +62%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	478 Points +39%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 16384	345 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (225 - 345, n=2)	285 Points -17%
Half Precision NPU 1.5
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	36297 Points +10482%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 36297, n=69, last 2 years)	3045 Points +788%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	907 Points +164%
Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	843 Points +146%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	561 Points +64%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 16384	343 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (211 - 343, n=2)	277 Points -19%
Quantized NPU 1.5
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288	48828 Points +7091%
Average of class Smartphone (133 - 49889, n=69, last 2 years)	4474 Points +559%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	3792 Points +458%
Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	1986 Points +192%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	1285 Points +89%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 16384	679 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (476 - 679, n=2)	578 Points -15%

AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Smartphone (46.4 - 3334, n=39, last 2 years)	648 Points
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	590 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	240 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (n=1)	159 Points
Score V6
Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	22780 Points
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	19229 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	10621 Points
Average of class Smartphone (55.6 - 22780, n=80, last 2 years)	5363 Points
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	797 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (n=1)	421 Points

平庸的 SoC 性能在图形基准测试中也很明显。在 GFXBench 的 4K Aztec Ruins 测试中，Pura 80 Ultra 的速度仅为 17 帧/秒，表现不佳，在大多数其他 GPU 测试中也只能退居二线。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	8102 Points +336%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6959 Points +274%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6907 Points +272%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	5959 Points +221%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3232 Points +74%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1859 Points

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	8072 Points +323%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	7021 Points +268%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6845 Points +259%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	6033 Points +216%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3281 Points +72%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1907 Points

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	30621 Points +370%
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	30166 Points +363%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	26614 Points +309%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	26375 Points +305%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	13193 Points +103%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6513 Points

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	14225 Points
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	13036 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	12395 Points
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	11776 Points

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	14331 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	12711 Points
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	12447 Points
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	12242 Points

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3081 Points +481%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2704 Points +410%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	2588 Points +388%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2397 Points +352%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1013 Points +91%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	530 Points

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3101 Points +485%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2736 Points +416%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	2679 Points +405%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2651 Points +400%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1014 Points +91%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	530 Points

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	121 fps +102%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps 0%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	917 fps +130%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	748 fps +88%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	713 fps +79%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	579 fps +45%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	406 fps +2%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	398 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	121 fps +102%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps 0%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	531 fps +150%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	472 fps +123%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	410 fps +93%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	341 fps +61%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	282 fps +33%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	212 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	119 fps +98%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps 0%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	399 fps +161%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	343 fps +124%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	284 fps +86%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	282 fps +84%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	207 fps +35%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	153 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +161%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +161%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	104 fps +126%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps +30%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	59 fps +28%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	46 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	239 fps +251%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	207 fps +204%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	198 fps +191%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	161 fps +137%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	81 fps +19%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	68 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +193%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +193%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	100 fps +144%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	64 fps +56%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps +46%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	41 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	127 fps +226%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	114 fps +192%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	107 fps +174%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	86 fps +121%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	55 fps +41%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	39 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	94 fps +57%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps 0%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	361 fps +222%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	296 fps +164%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	247 fps +121%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	237 fps +112%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	127 fps +13%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	112 fps

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	58 fps +241%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	52 fps +206%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	50 fps +194%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	36.4 fps +114%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	25 fps +47%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	17 fps

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)	358.295 Points +113%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)	315.056 Points +87%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)	193.311 Points +15%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (168.6 - 177.1, n=2)	172.8 Points +2%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra (Chrome 143.0.7499.109)	168.601 Points
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra (Chrome 143)	165.891 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (23.8 - 387, n=144, last 2 years)	156.9 Points -7%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)	643 runs/min +152%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)	425 runs/min +67%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)	345 runs/min +35%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra (Chrome 143.0.7499.109)	255 runs/min
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (250 - 255, n=2)	253 runs/min -1%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 643, n=115, last 2 years)	233 runs/min -9%

Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)	42.8 runs/min +171%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)	29.3 runs/min +85%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra (Chrome 143)	25.1 runs/min +59%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)	20.6 runs/min +30%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra (Chrome 143.0.7499.109)	15.8 runs/min
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (15.6 - 15.8, n=2)	15.7 runs/min -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 42.8, n=122, last 2 years)	14.8 runs/min -6%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)	306 Points +111%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)	236 Points +63%
Honor Magic8 Pro (Chrome 143)	216 Points +49%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)	177 Points +22%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (145 - 186, n=2)	165.5 Points +14%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 306, n=140, last 2 years)	147.9 Points +2%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra (Chrome 143.0.7499.109)	145 Points
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra (Chrome 143)	124 Points -14%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Honor Magic8 Pro (Chrome 143)	126661 Points +201%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)	121337 Points +189%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)	99202 Points +136%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)	84055 Points +100%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra (Chrome 143)	58421 Points +39%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (42026 - 55113, n=4)	49981 Points +19%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 126661, n=191, last 2 years)	49628 Points +18%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra (Chrome 143.0.7499.109)	42026 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=151, last 2 years)	1152 ms * -48%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra (Chrome 143.0.7499.109)	778 ms *
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (707 - 848, n=3)	778 ms * -0%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra (Chrome 143)	522.8 ms * +33%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)	472.5 ms * +39%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)	376.8 ms * +52%
Honor Magic8 Pro (Chrome 143)	284.4 ms * +63%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)	256.9 ms * +67%

* ... smaller is better

	Huawei Pura 80 Ultra	Honor Magic8 Pro	Google Pixel 10 Pro	Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra	Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra	Average 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-14%	-61%	-34%	-8%	-27%	-52%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)	4347.09	3942.69 -9%	1492.74 -66%	3823.28 -12%	4064.33 -7%	3702 ?(1851 - 4512, n=50) -15%	2208 ?(270 - 4370, n=193, last 2 years) -49%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)	4007.01	3732.81 -7%	1353.55 -66%	3361.24 -16%	3987.65 0%	3111 ?(1494 - 4051, n=50) -22%	1887 ?(103.2 - 4051, n=193, last 2 years) -53%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)	493.34	488.67 -1%	264.44 -46%	287.85 -42%	575.86 17%	387 ?(250 - 512, n=50) -22%	297 ?(47.6 - 576, n=193, last 2 years) -40%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)	969.67	587.11 -39%	347.84 -64%	331.61 -66%	551.82 -43%	484 ?(45.7 - 987, n=50) -50%	347 ?(9.4 - 987, n=193, last 2 years) -64%

排放：尽管性能适中，但节流严重

温度

在负载情况下，Pura 80 Ultra 的表面温度最高可升至 44 °C，但对热无害。

在负载情况下，SoC 性能会明显下降。在 3DMark 压力测试中，当我们激活性能模式时，这种情况尤为明显。

Max. Load

Idle


42.7 °C	43.5 °C	43.4 °C
41.6 °C	43.6 °C	41.1 °C
41.7 °C	42.5 °C	40 °C

Maximum: 43.6 °C
Average: 42.2 °C


39.8 °C	40.1 °C	39.2 °C
39 °C	41.9 °C	42.9 °C
38.6 °C	41.6 °C	42.6 °C

Maximum: 42.9 °C
Average: 40.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 26.6 °C | Room Temperature 21.2 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	99.8 % +215%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	81.2 % +156%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	54.9 % +73%
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	50 % +58%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	31.7 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	88.7 % +169%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	71.8 % +118%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	52.3 % +58%
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	50.7 % +54%
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	33 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	99.1 %
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	97.3 % -2%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe	64.7 % -35%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	50.6 % -49%
Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	48.4 % -51%

Huawei Pura 80 Ultra Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø9.74 (3.78-11.5)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø25 (22.7-31.7)

Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø29.9 (22-43.5)

Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø18 (17.1-19.3)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø26.9 (21.9-41.9)

Huawei Pura 80 Ultra Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø34.2 (12.7-40)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø60 (59.9-60)

Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø98.4 (78.1-156.3)

Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø64.8 (61.7-76)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø91 (76-138.4)

Huawei Pura 80 Ultra Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø34.5 (16.3-36.4)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø130.1 (116-160.6)

Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø70.9 (64.9-78.5)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø122.8 (98.3-163.3)

Huawei Pura 80 Ultra Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø3.9 (3.88-3.92)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.2 (12.6-19.5)

Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø14.1 (10.3-21.3)

Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.1: Ø7.49 (7.38-7.59)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø12.4 (10-19.8)

发言人

Pura 80 Ultra 的立体声扬声器音质坚实。中音和高音非常均衡，而低频几乎没有出现在混音中。

可通过 USB-C 和蓝牙 5.2 连接外部音频设备。不过，仅支持 SBC、AAC、LDAC 和 L2HC 等少数蓝牙编解码器。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Huawei Pura 80 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池寿命：100 瓦快速充电

能源消耗

Pura 80 Ultra 的海思 SoC 功耗低。无论是在空闲模式还是在负载情况下，对比设备的功耗有时都要高得多。

华为手机的快速充电功率为 100 W，无线充电功率可达 80 W。使用华为电源适配器，完全充电周期仅需 44 分钟。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.19 / 0.15 Watt
Idle	0.51 / 0.71 / 0.77 Watt
Load	4.03 / 11.03 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Huawei Pura 80 Ultra 5170 mAh	Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max 4823 mAh	Google Pixel 10 Pro 4870 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5000 mAh	Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-43%	-111%	-66%	-3%	-71%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	0.51	0.6 -18%	1.01 -98%	0.55 -8%	0.49 ?(0.47 - 0.51, n=3) 4%	0.849 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=157, last 2 years) -66%
Idle Average * (Watt)	0.71	1.3 -83%	1.65 -132%	0.77 -8%	0.757 ?(0.71 - 0.78, n=3) -7%	1.446 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=157, last 2 years) -104%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	0.77	1.6 -108%	2.05 -166%	0.91 -18%	0.873 ?(0.77 - 0.99, n=3) -13%	1.63 ?(0.75 - 4.46, n=157, last 2 years) -112%
Load Average * (Watt)	4.03	4.1 -2%	7.25 -80%	13.81 -243%	4.03 ?(n=1) -0%	6.87 ?(2.3 - 15.4, n=133, last 2 years) -70%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	11.03	11.5 -4%	19.78 -79%	16.69 -51%	11 ?(n=1) -0%	11.2 ?(3.53 - 22, n=133, last 2 years) -2%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Huawei Pura 80 Ultra HiSilicon Kirin 9020; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.96 (0.533-11)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.59 (0.702-11.1)

Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.37 (0.969-15.4)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.44 (0.757-16.7)

Huawei Pura 80 Ultra HiSilicon Kirin 9020; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.501 (0.4043-0.666)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.941 (0.777-1.253)

Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.865 (0.78-1.11)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.689 (0.646-0.893)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Huawei Pura 80 Ultra HiSilicon Kirin 9020; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.92 (6.68-9.38)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.8 (10.3-11.5)

Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.8 (11.5-11.9)

Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.2 (8.75-11.7)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø15.9 (12.7-16.6)

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.08 (9.02-9.14)

Huawei Pura 80 Ultra HiSilicon Kirin 9020; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.501 (0.4043-0.666)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.941 (0.777-1.253)

Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.557 (0.4958-0.791)

Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.865 (0.78-1.11)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.689 (0.646-0.893)

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.983 (0.9-1.319)

电池寿命

在电池续航时间方面，尽管 Pura 80 Ultra 的功耗很低，但其表现并不尽如人意。在我们的 WLAN 测试中，在 150 尼特的条件下，仅超过 19 小时的续航时间无疑是个不错的结果，但竞争对手如三星三星Galaxy S25 Ultra或小米 Poco F8 Ultra等竞争对手都无法与之相提并论，更不用说 Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max.

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 143.0.7499.146)		19h 03min

Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3
Huawei Pura 80 Ultra 5170 mAh	19.1 h
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max 4823 mAh	28.6 h
Honor Magic8 Pro 6270 mAh	26.9 h
Google Pixel 10 Pro 4870 mAh	21.1 h
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5000 mAh	22.2 h
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra 6500 mAh	21.9 h

Notebookcheck 对华为 Pura 80 Ultra 的总体印象

华为 Pura 80 Ultra 在测试中被证明是一款不折不扣的拍照手机。华为 Pura 80 Ultra 在测试中证明了它是一款不折不扣的拍照手机。结果，华为 Pura 80 Ultra 仍然是一款优秀的智能手机，但在许多方面都无法与当前的旗舰产品相媲美。

Back to the verdict

Huawei Pura 80 Ultra - 01/21/2026 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

91%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

94%

Connectivity

66 / 69 → 95%

Weight

88%

Battery

92%

Display

91%

Games Performance

18 / 55 → 32%

Application Performance

66 / 85 → 78%

AI Performance

22%

Temperature

87%

Noise

100%

Audio

79 / 90 → 88%

Camera

85%

Average

69%

83%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
50%

Packaging
70%

Power Use
95%

Repairability
40%

Software Updates
83.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 56.4%

潜在替代品比较

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 83.3%	Huawei Pura 80 Ultra HiSilicon Kirin 9020 ⎘ HiSilicon Maleoon 920 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB	Amazon: 1. $15.99 AKABEILA [3 Pack Privacy Scr... 2. $7.99 Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible ... 3. $9.89 UYRUREL Screen Protector for... List Price: 1399 Euro	233.5 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.80" 2848x1276 460 PPI OLED
2. 89.2%	Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro ⎘ Apple A19 Pro 6-Core GPU ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB NVMe	Amazon: 1. $59.00 Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Tech... 2. $49.00 Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Sili... 3. $6.98 Ailun 3 Pack Screen Protecto... List Price: 1449 Euro	233 g	256 GB NVMe	6.90" 2868x1320 460 PPI OLED
3. 89.3%	Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB	Amazon: 1. $8.99 Natbok 2 Pack 3D Compatible ... 2. $11.88 [5 Pack] Screen Protector fo... 3. $12.68 Puccy 3 Pack Screen Protecto... List Price: 1300€	219 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.71" 2808x1256 458 PPI OLED
4. 88.9%	Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5 ⎘ IMG DXT-48-1536 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: $1,099.00 List Price: 1199€	207 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.30" 2856x1280 497 PPI OLED
5. 89.4%	Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: 1. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, 25... 2. $949.00 SAMSUNG Galaxy S25 Ultra SM-... 3. $1,059.50 SAMSUNG Galaxy S25 Ultra SM-... List Price: 1449€	218 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.90" 3120x1440 498 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2X
6. 88.2%	Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB	Amazon: 1. $10.79 Ibywind for Xiaomi Poco F8 U... 2. $8.99 Suttkue for Xiaomi POCO F8 U... 3. $8.99 Suttkue for Xiaomi POCO F8 U... List Price: 900€	220 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.90" 2608x1200 416 PPI AMOLED

华为 Pura 80 Ultra 智能手机评测：妥协的相机怪兽

有很多光，但也有很多阴影。

华为 Pura 80 Ultra 的评价

Pros

Cons

价格和供应情况

Table of Contents

规格

表壳：重量级，表面高光处理

尺寸比较

特点大量内存和 USB-C 3.2

软件：EMUI 15 操作系统基于Android 12

可持续性

通信与全球导航卫星系统：没有 5G 的旗舰智能手机

电话功能和通话质量

相机：性能非常强大

配件和保修：包装内有很多

输入设备和操作：电源按钮上的指纹传感器

显示屏正如承诺的那样，亮度高达 3,000 尼特

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能配备海思 SoC 的 Pura 80 Ultra

排放：尽管性能适中，但节流严重

温度

3DMark 压力测试

发言人

Huawei Pura 80 Ultra audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra audio analysis

电池寿命：100 瓦快速充电

能源消耗

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Notebookcheck 对华为 Pura 80 Ultra 的总体印象

潜在替代品比较

More articles related to this device

Transparency