Notebookcheck Logo

Nothing Phone (2) 评测:价格合理的高端智能手机中的 LED 效果

Glyph 回来了 Phone (2) 比 Nothing 的首款智能手机要贵得多,但这次它拥有真正的高端实力。在我们的评测中,您将发现它是否有潜力凭借其标志性的 Glyph 界面和可靠的性价比成为真正的旗舰杀手。
5G Android ARM Smartphone
无电话 (2)

没有取得令人尊敬的成功手机 (1)现在,该制造商打算推出新款 Phone (2),以扩大其产品阵容。得益于真正的高端 SoC 和更快的充电速度,新机型有望让竞争对手的旗舰设备望尘莫及。虽然 Phone (2) 的价格明显高于前代产品,但今年推出更高品质设备的决定是合理的,因为 手机(1)可以保留在产品系列中,买家也有了更多选择。

当然,手机背面由无数 LED 灯组成的标志性 Glyph 界面又回来了,甚至在某些方面还进行了改进。至于您是否应该投资 750 美元购买 Nothing Phone (2),我们将在评测中详细分析。

Nothing Phone (2) (Phone Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
Display
6.70 inch 20:9, 2412 x 1080 pixel 394 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, OLED, 240 Hz sampling rate, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 228 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B6/​B8/​B19), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B25/​B26/​B28/​B30/​B32/​B34/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B42/​B48/​B66/​B71), 5G (n1/​n2/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n12/​n20/​n25/​n28/​n30/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n66/​n71/​n75/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.6 x 162.1 x 76.4
Battery
4700 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 45 Watt charging, 15 Watt wireless charging, ​5W reverse charging
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.88, phase comparison-AF (All-pixel AF/​omnidirectional), OIS, dual LED-flash, Videos @2160p/​60fps (Camera 1); 50.0MP, f/​2.2, wide angle lens (Camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/​2.45, Videos @1080p/​60fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid), USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, IP54-certified, Glyph interface, fanless
Weight
201.2 g
Price
699 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
87.4 %
08/2023
Nothing Phone (2)
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
201.2 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2412x1080
85.6 %
07/2022
Nothing Phone (1)
SD 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L
193.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.55"2400x1080
86.4 %
01/2023
Xiaomi 12T
Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6
202 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2712x1220
86.4 %
07/2023
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
SD 778G 4G, Adreno 642L
188 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.78"2652x1200
87 %
08/2022
OnePlus 10T
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
203.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2412x1080

Nothing Phone (2) 比上一代产品更重、更长,但屏幕更大、性能更强。Nothing Phone(2)的两面再次由大猩猩 5 号玻璃保护,透明的背面可以看到电缆通道和无线充电螺旋。后部玻璃现在采用了弧形设计,使 Nothing Phone (2) 能够舒适地握在手中。

机身侧面采用铝制边框,棱角分明的设计和药丸状按键让人联想到当前的 iPhone。Phone (2) 有深灰色 白色两种颜色可供选择。

做工令人满意:简洁的材料过渡和细小的缝隙营造出高品质的外观。不过,我们在评测过程中发现,智能手机长时间暴露在阳光下会变形,缝隙也会随之变大。冷却后翘曲现象会消失,但之前关于前代产品背面进水和灰尘的报道让我们感到疑惑。

外壳的防护等级为 IP54,因此与前代产品相比,防水溅性能略有提高。不过,你不应该带着 Nothing Phone (2) 去游泳。

我们喜欢 Nothing 在包装上印上设备的二氧化碳排放量,并尝试通过各种措施尽可能降低智能手机对环境的影响,如回收设备中的材料和无塑料包装。关于手机 (2) 的详细可持续发展报告,请访问网站.

字形界面是这款智能手机的设计亮点。在透明的玻璃背面下有一个由白色 LED 灯组成的图案,可以模拟倒计时器和显示通知,Phone (2) 在这些图案的数量和功能上都有了很大的扩展。您现在可以使用 Glyph Composer 创建自己的铃声,一些第三方服务提供商(如 Uber)现在也在使用该功能,例如显示司机到达所需地点前的时间。

无电话 (2)
无电话 (2)
无电话 (2)
无电话 (2)
无电话 (2)
无电话 (2)
无电话 (2)

尺寸比较

164.2 mm 74.4 mm 7.9 mm 188 g163 mm 75.4 mm 8.75 mm 203.5 g163.1 mm 75.9 mm 8.6 mm 202 g162.1 mm 76.4 mm 8.6 mm 201.2 g159.2 mm 75.8 mm 8.3 mm 193.5 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备 - Nothing Phone 不支持 eSIM (2)

Nothing Phone (2) 有三种内存版本:

  • 128 GB 存储空间/8 GB 内存:599 美元
  • 256 GB 存储空间/12 GB 内存:749 美元749 美元
  • 512 GB 存储空间/12 GB 内存:859 美元859 美元

缺少 microSD 读卡器,但有 2 个 nano-SIM 卡插槽。遗憾的是,不支持 eSIM 卡。USB-C 端口仍然只能通过 USB 2.0 内部连接,因此数据传输速度较慢,也无法通过 USB 线缆输出图像。

左:音量摇杆
左:音量摇杆
右:待机键
右:待机键
首页: 麦克风
首页: 麦克风
底部SIM 卡插槽、USB-C 接口、扬声器
底部SIM 卡插槽、USB-C 接口、扬声器

软件 - 也可根据要求提供无设计的软件

Nothing OS 2.0 基于Android 13,其像素化的黑白设计非常时尚,但你必须习惯没有标签的图标。喜欢经典Android 外观的用户可以在设置时选择这一选项,也可以在设置后轻松恢复,因为 Nothing OS 主要通过图标包和小工具来实现设计,用户可以随时删除或更改这些图标包和小工具。

没有预装第三方广告应用程序。我们设备上的安全补丁是从 2023 年 6 月开始的,因此在审查时仍是合理的最新版本。在我们进行评测期间,Nothing 还发布了一些小更新,并附有详细的补丁说明,以改进智能手机的功能。总体而言,这款智能手机预计将在 4 年内每 2 个月获得一次安全更新。此外,该智能手机还有 3 个新的Android 版本。

软件 无 手机 (2)
软件 无 手机 (2)
软件 无 手机 (2)

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - Nothing 手机上的快速 WiFi 6E

Nothing Phone (2) 配备了 WiFi 6E,因此可以利用较少使用的 6 GHz 频段。在使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 参考路由器进行测试时,事实证明无线局域网连接在经历了最初的困难后相当稳定,但在发送和接收数据时速度很不均匀,这一点与手机(1)如出一辙。总的来说,速度明显高于前代产品。

由于支持多种 4G 和 5G 频率,Nothing Phone (2) 可以在全球范围内使用。在我们两周的评测期间,信号质量一直很好,与其他高端智能手机不相上下。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
934 (768min - 949max) MBit/s
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
888 (833min - 922max) MBit/s
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
728 (460min - 795max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=211, last 2 years)
653 MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
981 (965min - 1014max) MBit/s
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
933 (865min - 958max) MBit/s
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
788 (585min - 893max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=212, last 2 years)
689 MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone
  (229 - 1894, n=61, last 2 years)
1549 MBit/s +2%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1513 (1097min - 1582max) MBit/s
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
946 (926min - 951max) MBit/s -37%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone
  (598 - 1844, n=61, last 2 years)
1376 MBit/s +72%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
799 (577min - 890max) MBit/s
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
598 (517min - 731max) MBit/s -25%
0801602403204004805606407208008809601040112012001280136014401520Tooltip
Nothing Phone (2); iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1513 (1097-1582)
Nothing Phone (2); iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø799 (577-890)
户外 GPS 测试
户外 GPS 测试
可用的卫星网络
可用的卫星网络

只要您带着 Nothing Phone (2) 走出去,就会立即被精确定位到 3 米处。支持所有主要的卫星网络,但不支持 SBAS 系统,以获得更高的精确度。在室内也能进行卫星定位,但精度不高。

智能手机的定位功能还需要经过实际测试,因此我们骑上自行车,带上 Garmin Venu 2 智能手表进行对比。Nothing Phone (2)非常准确;我们只在两个地方观察到与路线有极小的偏差。因此,我们强烈推荐将这款智能手机用作导航设备。

跟踪无手机 (2) - 概述
跟踪无手机 (2) - 概述
追踪 "无 "电话 (2) - 循环
追踪 "无 "电话 (2) - 循环
追踪无声电话 (2) - 桥梁
追踪无声电话 (2) - 桥梁
跟踪 Garmin Venu 2 - 概述
跟踪 Garmin Venu 2 - 概述
跟踪 Garmin Venu 2 - 循环
跟踪 Garmin Venu 2 - 循环
跟踪 Garmin Venu 2 - 桥梁
跟踪 Garmin Venu 2 - 桥梁

电话和语音质量 - 通过扬声器听起来更清晰

它没有使用Android 的标准电话应用程序,因此从其他品牌转过来的用户应该马上就能找到使用方法。

通话质量总体不错,但也有不足之处:内置听筒听起来有点闷,普通麦克风和免提麦克风都无法捕捉到安静的声音。如果通过扬声器与对方通话,通话听起来会清晰得多。

相机 - 改进图像质量的新型传感器

使用前置摄像头拍照
使用前置摄像头拍照

从纸面上看,这款手机的摄像头似乎没有什么变化。无手机 (1).虽然仍有两个 5000 万像素的镜头,但制造商在主摄像头上安装了更先进的索尼 IMX 890 传感器。功能更强大的 SoC 还能确保相机功能更敏捷,处理照片的速度更快。

照片第一眼看上去光线充足,色彩逼真。不过,对于较远的物体,摄像头往往会忽略细节。传感器在环境光线很弱的情况下也能拍摄出清晰的照片,但在光线很暗的地方就会失去清晰度。广角镜头也是 5000 万像素,拍摄的照片效果不错,还可以稍稍放大而不会丢失太多细节。

但缺少了更高质量相机系统所具备的真正变焦功能。Nothing Phone (2) 上没有潜望镜摄像头;最好的是混合变焦,广角和主摄像头都可以变焦。

总的来说,Nothing Phone (2) 可以拍摄出不错的照片,但视频呢?这款智能手机能以 60 fps 的速度录制 4K 视频。自动对焦和亮度调节的反应都非常迅速可靠。拍摄出的影片令人赏心悦目,尤其是在明亮的光线条件下。

前置 3200 万像素摄像头。它可以拍摄细节丰富的自拍照,还可以稍作放大,但在暗处的清晰度可以更高一些。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera - flowerMain camera - surrounding environmentMain camera - low lightWide angle
click to load images

在实验室的全棚照明下,主相机拍摄的照片清晰度很高,只是边缘部分略有下降。我们非常喜欢照片的对比度和细节。在仅有 1 勒克斯照明的情况下,图像仍然清晰可辨,但暗部几乎没有任何清晰度。

ColorChecker
17.7 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
9 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Nothing Phone (2): 10.1 ∆E min: 3.12 - max: 18.59 ∆E
ColorChecker
24.2 ∆E
26.6 ∆E
28.5 ∆E
30.5 ∆E
28.7 ∆E
30.2 ∆E
26.8 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
26.5 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
26.6 ∆E
20 ∆E
26.7 ∆E
33.8 ∆E
25.6 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
24.8 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Nothing Phone (2): 24.35 ∆E min: 12.85 - max: 33.82 ∆E

配件和保修 - 不包括充电器

Nothing Phone (2) 不含充电器。包装盒里只有一根 USB 线和一个 SIM 卡工具。充电器可以在Nothing的网上商店购买,价格因地区而异(例如德国为35欧元)。还可购买保护套。

制造商为在欧盟购买的设备提供 24 个月的保修服务。当然,其他地区的保修期可能有所不同,因此买家在购买前应仔细确认。

输入设备和操作 - 屏幕后的指纹传感器

由于采用了 120 Hz 的显示屏,智能手机的操作非常流畅。触摸屏的灵敏度直达边角,对非常轻的触摸也能做出反应。通过一项实验功能,屏幕的查询率可以进一步提高,这样智能手机就能应对游戏等频繁触摸的苛刻场景。

指纹传感器隐藏在显示屏后面,但在纵向格式下位置很靠下,因此你必须伸手才能接触到它。它几乎可以立即解锁智能手机,并能非常可靠地识别存储的指纹。通过面部识别进行生物识别解锁也是可行的,但这里只使用二维图像,因此该功能很容易被人为操纵。

纵向模式键盘
纵向模式键盘
横向模式键盘
横向模式键盘

显示屏 - 明亮,带直流调光

子像素矩阵
子像素矩阵

Nothing Phone (2) 的 OLED 屏幕为 6.7 英寸,分辨率为 2,412 x 1,080 像素,每秒最多可显示 120 帧画面。

我们非常喜欢该屏幕的最大亮度,Nothing 规定为 1,000 cd/m²。在全屏播放的测试中,我们几乎达到了这一数值,在较小的屏幕区域播放 HDR 内容时,亮度甚至可以更高。

屏幕使用直流调光来根据刷新率调整闪烁,因此应该不会造成太大困扰。不过,敏感人士在购买前应在低亮度下测试屏幕。

940
cd/m²
945
cd/m²
942
cd/m²
949
cd/m²
951
cd/m²
946
cd/m²
954
cd/m²
956
cd/m²
947
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 956 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 947.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 951 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
98.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.203
Nothing Phone (2)
OLED, 2412x1080, 6.70
Nothing Phone (1)
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Xiaomi 12T
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.67
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
OLED, 2652x1200, 6.78
OnePlus 10T
Fluid AMOLED, 2412x1080, 6.70
Screen
-17%
-11%
-47%
-53%
Brightness middle
951
620
-35%
915
-4%
729
-23%
861
-9%
Brightness
948
625
-34%
914
-4%
719
-24%
856
-10%
Brightness Distribution
98
98
0%
98
0%
92
-6%
97
-1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1
1.24
-24%
1.1
-10%
1.39
-39%
2.27
-127%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.2
2.31
-5%
2.7
-23%
4.74
-115%
4.17
-90%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.6
1.7
-6%
2
-25%
2.8
-75%
2.9
-81%
Gamma
2.203 100%
2.318 95%
2.24 98%
2.271 97%
2.303 96%
CCT
6516 100%
6325 103%
6457 101%
6738 96%
6141 106%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 90 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 90 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 90 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17770 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最低亮度
最低亮度
25% 亮度
25% 亮度
50% 亮度
50% 亮度
75% 亮度
75% 亮度
100% 亮度
100% 亮度

在固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列

在我们使用分光光度计和 CalMAN 软件进行的测量中,屏幕的色彩再现非常准确。为此,您应在设置中选择 "标准 "色彩配置文件。这样,您就可以确保视频内容完全按照制作者的意图呈现。

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3 色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3 色彩空间
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.7 ms rise
↘ 0.7 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6 ms rise
↘ 0.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.6 ms).

在室外,OLED 显示屏也能大显身手--亮度传感器会做出可靠的反应,必要时会增加亮度,即使在阳光非常充足的日子里,用户也能很好地观看显示屏。

可视角度也同样出色。

室外使用
室外使用
视角稳定性
视角稳定性

性能 - 经济型智能手机的高端动力

没有使用 2022 年的高端 SoC,即高通骁龙 8+ Gen 1、这已不再是全新的产品。这样既能降低成本,又能提供高端性能。

在基准测试中,它在同价位智能手机中的排名非常靠前,有时甚至高出一大截。在日常使用中,系统运行非常流畅,同时还为多任务处理或复杂应用(如视频编辑或无人机控制)提供了充足的性能储备。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (897 - 1389, n=23)
1280 Points +2%
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
1277 Points +2%
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1255 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=211, last 2 years)
914 Points -27%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
907 Points -28%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
824 Points -34%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
790 Points -37%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (3782 - 4436, n=23)
4173 Points +3%
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4045 Points
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
3987 Points -1%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
3720 Points -8%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
3023 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=211, last 2 years)
3005 Points -26%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2998 Points -26%
Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1719 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (1530 - 1806, n=5)
1719 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 2930, n=112, last 2 years)
1373 Points -20%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
1008 Points -41%
Multi-Core
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4584 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (4140 - 4690, n=5)
4483 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 7408, n=112, last 2 years)
3804 Points -17%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2418 Points -47%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (782013 - 1119358, n=21)
997518 Points +7%
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
932991 Points
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
846323 Points -9%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
778486 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=146, last 2 years)
748379 Points -20%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
582264 Points -38%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
526944 Points -44%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
16612 Points
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
15944 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (11029 - 17727, n=22)
14796 Points -11%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
12684 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=210, last 2 years)
11860 Points -29%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
11662 Points -30%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
10806 Points -35%
CrossMark - Overall
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1116 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (749 - 1178, n=21)
1033 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=163, last 2 years)
843 Points -24%
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
806 Points -28%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
764 Points -32%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
760 Points -32%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
711 Points -36%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
8320 Points +6%
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7839 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (5642 - 8753, n=21)
7507 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=161, last 2 years)
5883 Points -25%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
5393 Points -31%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4768 Points -39%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4610 Points -41%
System
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
12230 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12171 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (8750 - 13563, n=21)
11842 Points -3%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
10424 Points -14%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
10281 Points -16%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
10066 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=161, last 2 years)
9825 Points -19%
Memory
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
8822 Points +4%
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
8458 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (3871 - 9114, n=21)
7549 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=161, last 2 years)
6394 Points -24%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
5271 Points -38%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4763 Points -44%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
4662 Points -45%
Graphics
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
24037 Points +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (16742 - 26660, n=21)
21295 Points +11%
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
19110 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=161, last 2 years)
14727 Points -23%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
10920 Points -43%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
8175 Points -57%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
6546 Points -66%
Web
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1919 Points
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
1833 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (1198 - 2006, n=21)
1713 Points -11%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
1651 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=161, last 2 years)
1511 Points -21%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
1274 Points -34%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
1273 Points -34%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (3291 - 84787, n=19)
47040 Points +241%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
26371 Points +91%
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=146, last 2 years)
21632 Points +57%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
20784 Points +51%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
19385 Points +40%
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13807 Points
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
11648 Points -16%
AImark - Score v3.x
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
128240 Points
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
43539 Points -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (887 - 128240, n=9)
29608 Points -77%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 245629, n=107, last 2 years)
17669 Points -86%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
Points -100%

我们的测试设备在 GFXBench 的 4K 基准测试中达到了 20 帧/秒,因此理论上可以玩非常高分辨率的游戏,但这类游戏在 App Store 中很少。在全高清模式下,屏幕的原生分辨率为 60 帧/秒,可以顺利实现。

总之,与同类昂贵手机相比,这款智能手机的性能非常强大。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2876 Points +13%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2538 Points
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
690 Points -73%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
686 Points -73%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2824 Points +3%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2754 Points
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
692 Points -75%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
692 Points -75%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
113 fps +88%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps +72%
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
435 fps +25%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
349 fps
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
271 fps -22%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
141 fps -60%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
134 fps -62%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
107 fps +78%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps +23%
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps -2%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
221 fps +5%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
211 fps
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
129 fps -39%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
82 fps -61%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78 fps -63%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73 fps +22%
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps -3%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps -30%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
171 fps +28%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
134 fps
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95 fps -29%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps -52%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps -57%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +2%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -32%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps -44%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
24 fps -59%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
108 fps +42%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 fps
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps -29%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -51%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps -57%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps 0%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps -46%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps -63%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps -73%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps +5%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
26 fps -38%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15 fps -64%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13 fps -69%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps -18%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps -40%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
26 fps -57%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
123 fps +9%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
113 fps
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps -41%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -65%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps -69%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps 0%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12 fps -40%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6.7 fps -66%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5.9 fps -70%

大型网站在 Nothing Phone (2) 上的加载速度非常快,在流畅滚动时通常可以看到图片。在浏览器基准测试中,测试设备领先于同类智能手机,排名第一。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)
178.548 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (76.2 - 178.5, n=21)
121.1 Points -32%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=167, last 2 years)
108.3 Points -39%
OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104)
81.383 Points -54%
Xiaomi 12T (Chrome 108)
81.171 Points -55%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro (Huawei Browser 14)
74.88 Points -58%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
73.679 Points -59%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)
162 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (69.1 - 167, n=16)
111.4 runs/min -31%
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=151, last 2 years)
110.8 runs/min -32%
OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104)
93.4 runs/min -42%
Xiaomi 12T (Chrome 108)
64.5 runs/min -60%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro (Huawei Browser 14)
56.6 runs/min -65%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chome 103)
53.71 runs/min -67%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)
147 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (69 - 159, n=19)
111 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=159, last 2 years)
101 Points -31%
Xiaomi 12T (Chrome 108)
79 Points -46%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro (Huawei Browser 14)
79 Points -46%
OnePlus 10T
75 Points -49%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
69 Points -53%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)
204 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (106 - 224, n=14)
159.4 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=115, last 2 years)
136.7 Points -33%
Xiaomi 12T (Chrome 108)
113 Points -45%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro (Huawei Browser 14)
109 Points -47%
OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104)
106 Points -48%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
102 Points -50%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)
52931 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (17622 - 55611, n=22)
41373 Points -22%
OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104)
39982 Points -24%
Xiaomi 12T (Chrome 108)
35255 Points -33%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=212, last 2 years)
33583 Points -37%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro (Huawei Browser 14)
29489 Points -44%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
24488 Points -54%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
1796.1 ms * -138%
OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104)
1627.3 ms * -115%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=167, last 2 years)
1546 ms * -105%
Xiaomi 12T (Chrome 108)
1446.8 ms * -92%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro (Huawei Browser 14)
1404.8 ms * -86%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (729 - 1707, n=20)
1047 ms * -39%
Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)
755.5 ms *

* ... smaller is better

UFS 3.1 内存通常出现在 750 美元左右的智能手机中,但 Nothing Phone (2) 的内存控制器也能很好地完成任务。因此,加载时间短,数据传输快。

Nothing Phone (2)Nothing Phone (1)Xiaomi 12THuawei Nova 11 ProOnePlus 10TAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-22%
10%
-35%
-38%
-15%
-23%
Sequential Read 256KB
1949.5
1638
-16%
1834.32
-6%
1009.1
-48%
1568.37
-20%
1759 ?(1004 - 2037, n=88)
-10%
Sequential Write 256KB
1517.6
1351.9
-11%
1768.39
17%
809
-47%
847.69
-44%
1130 ?(452 - 1873, n=88)
-26%
Random Read 4KB
287.5
240.6
-16%
342.8
19%
229.8
-20%
173.45
-40%
Random Write 4KB
403.8
228.2
-43%
437.07
8%
303
-25%
211.24
-48%

游戏 - 60 fps 绝对可能

虽然 Nothing Phone (2) 并不是一款指定的游戏手机,但在所有测试游戏中,即使在高设置下,它仍能达到 60 帧/秒。

由于帧率非常稳定,即使是要求更高的游戏玩家也能在这款智能手机上玩得很好。遗憾的是,120 Hz 的最大屏幕几乎无法使用。帧频是通过GameBench软件进行测量。

在我们的测试中,通过触摸屏和内置位置传感器进行控制的效果非常好。

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
暗黑破坏神:不朽
暗黑破坏神:不朽
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Nothing Phone (2); PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.7.0: Ø59.7 (58-60)
Nothing Phone (2); PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.7.0: Ø59.3 (57-60)
Nothing Phone (2); Diablo Immortal; Medium Mobile Low; 2.0.2: Ø59.9 (59-60)
Nothing Phone (2); Diablo Immortal; Ultra Mobile Very High; 2.0.2: Ø59.7 (57-60)

排放 - 加热和节流

温度

在长时间负载情况下,我们测得的最高机箱温度为 45.8 °C。这一点很明显,但并不严重。在日常使用中,温度通常会较低,但长时间游戏肯定会导致温度明显升高。

在长时间负载情况下,处理器也会出现明显的节流现象,有时在运行 20 次基准测试后,只能提供初始性能的 60%。

Max. Load
 45.5 °C42.7 °C39.8 °C 
 45.6 °C43.4 °C39.8 °C 
 45.8 °C43.2 °C40.2 °C 
Maximum: 45.8 °C
Average: 42.9 °C
35.4 °C38.6 °C41.4 °C
35.9 °C38 °C42.1 °C
34.9 °C40 °C41.8 °C
Maximum: 42.1 °C
Average: 38.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41.6 °C | Room Temperature 23.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.8 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.5 % +65%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 % +64%
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
92.7 % +54%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60.2 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 % +13%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
87.3 %
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
% -100%
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø10.3 (10.2-11.6)
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø4.12 (4.09-4.14)
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø48.1 (38.2-63.4)
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø15.3 (15.3-15.3)
Huawei Nova 11 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.9 (14.8-15)
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø61.8 (59-63.6)
热成像 - 前部
热成像 - 前部
热成像 - 背面
热成像 - 背面

发言人

听筒在 Nothing Phone (2) 上被用作第二个扬声器,因此只要位置正确,就能产生轻微的立体声效果,整体音效也会稍强一些。扬声器的音量适中,重现音乐的效果相当清晰。

不过,这款智能手机听起来还是有些高音偏重,因此真正的音频发烧友最好还是使用耳机或外置扬声器。在无线音频编解码方面,从 SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive、aptX TWS+、LDAC、LHDC 到 V5,几乎应有尽有。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs204036.12535.933.73133.5284034.532.15036.533.96327.526.78020.319.410020.321.212520.632.116022.337.220017.936.525013.842.231515.149.140012.555.750011.958.663011.661.980014.467.5100014.370.2125012.472.7160010.473.8200010.672.125001171.5315011.569.8400012.265.1500012.962.4630013.567.8800014.370100001571.81250015.764.91600016.647.1SPL25.281.9N0.749.7median 13.8median 64.9Delta2.111.240.435.640.537.427.335.231.830.540.636.625.229.121.318.118.922.516.831.520.241.51647.818.253.51456.61358.117.262.517.962.219.563.919.570.622.274.721.177.425.974.919.973.915.172.814.7711565.214.859.813.86514.965.914.758.815.455.331.731.7841.31.352.9median 16.8median 62.2median 68.42.39.315.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNothing Phone (2)OnePlus 10T
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nothing Phone (2) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

OnePlus 10T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 68.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 68.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 68.4% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (124.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 93% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 98% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 日常使用相当持久

耗电量

Nothing Phone (2) 的耗电量在空载或低负载时相当不错,但在最大负载时会急剧增加,耗电量非常高。

如果必须将智能手机插上电源,充电功率可达 45 瓦,但不包括合适的充电器。在我们的测试实验室中,智能手机可以顺利接受大多数充电器,在满负荷充电的情况下,最多 1:30 小时即可充满电。无线充电的功率可达 15 瓦,从其他设备反向充电的功率为 5 瓦。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.1 / 1.4 Watt
Load midlight 5 / 10.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Nothing Phone (2)
4700 mAh
Nothing Phone (1)
4500 mAh
Xiaomi 12T
5000 mAh
OnePlus 10T
4800 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
4%
-19%
16%
-25%
-8%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
1
-11%
1.38
-53%
0.8
11%
1.015 ?(0.56 - 2.57, n=19)
-13%
Idle Average *
1.1
1.2
-9%
1.83
-66%
1.2
-9%
1.869 ?(0.71 - 8.65, n=19)
-70%
Idle Maximum *
1.4
1.5
-7%
1.9
-36%
1.3
7%
2.02 ?(0.79 - 8.71, n=19)
-44%
Load Average *
5
4.2
16%
3.23
35%
3.5
30%
5.69 ?(2.75 - 15, n=19)
-14%
Load Maximum *
10.4
7.4
29%
7.71
26%
5.9
43%
8.55 ?(4.54 - 15, n=19)
18%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Nothing Phone (2); Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.53 (0.873-10.8)
Nothing Phone (2); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.994 (0.902-1.14)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Nothing Phone (2); 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.7 (10.3-11.2)
Nothing Phone (2); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.994 (0.902-1.14)

电池寿命

Nothing Phone (2) 配备了 4,700 毫安时的强力电池,在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中可确保长达 15:09 小时的稳定运行时间。小米 12T 的续航时间要长得多,而 Nothing 手机(1)也能多上网几分钟,但 Phone (2) 的续航时间足以满足日常使用。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
29h 04min
WiFi Websurfing
15h 9min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
20h 45min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 28min
Nothing Phone (2)
4700 mAh
Nothing Phone (1)
4500 mAh
Xiaomi 12T
5000 mAh
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
4500 mAh
OnePlus 10T
4800 mAh
Battery Runtime
-3%
-6%
-24%
13%
Reader / Idle
1744
1813
4%
1578
-10%
1795
3%
H.264
1245
1059
-15%
1027
-18%
1646
32%
WiFi v1.3
909
926
2%
984
8%
689
-24%
856
-6%
Load
268
259
-3%
256
-4%
332
24%

Pros

+ 动力强劲价格合理
+ 价格合理
+ 设计别致
+ 照片质量好
+ 电池续航时间长
+ 60 帧/秒的游戏速度
+ 明亮的真彩屏幕
+ 无线充电
+ 非常精确的导航

Cons

- 不含充电器
- 不支持 eSIM
- 仅 USB 2.0 端口
- 在负载情况下会出现明显节流

结论 - 异常超值

回顾:Nothing Phone (2)。测试设备由德国 Nothing 公司提供。
回顾:Nothing Phone (2)。测试设备由德国 Nothing 公司提供。

Nothing Phone (2) 的最便宜版本已经上市,售价为 749 美元,对于配备高端 SoC 的智能手机来说,这绝对是一个不错的价格。毕竟,它还拥有良好的电池续航能力、近 1000 cd/m² 的高亮度 OLED 屏幕(带直流调光功能)和非常出色的色彩还原能力,以及快速充电技术和无线充电功能。

操作系统也可以在没有制造商设计的情况下运行,并计划在 4 年内接受安全更新。多种手机频率意味着这款智能手机可以在全球范围内使用,而且摄像头的拍照效果也不错。虽然质量比不上高端相机,也缺少光学变焦功能,但如果你只想拍摄色彩自然、清晰的照片,Nothing Phone (2) 是一个不错的选择。

半透明的设计依然引人注目,字形界面也是一个不错的噱头,用途越来越多。

Nothing Phone(2)没有配备充电器,你可能会觉得有用,也可能觉得没有必要,但不支持 eSIM 卡确实令人讨厌。蹩脚的 USB 2.0 端口无法通过端口转发视频,这也不应该出现在高端智能手机中。

Nothing Phone (2) 速度很快,设计独特,功能高端,价格合理。

如果你喜欢中端性能和 Glyph 界面,你可以花 405 美元购买 Nothing Phone (1)美国亚马逊。一加手机 一加 10T速度也非常快,而且价格便宜。

价格和供应情况

在 Nothing Phone (2) 的三种存储配置中,只有 256 GB 和 512 GB 版本在美国亚马逊有售。前者(256 GB)的深灰色白色版本售价 749 美元,后者(512 GB)的深灰色白色版本售价 859 美元。

印度亚马逊也提供与美国亚马逊完全相同的存储配置:256GB(深灰色白色)售价 54,999 ₹,512GB(深灰色白色)售价 59,999 ₹。

Nothing Phone (2) - 07/26/2023 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
85%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
51 / 70 → 73%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
93%
Games Performance
66 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
88 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
87%
Noise
100%
Audio
75 / 90 → 83%
Camera
72%
Average
81%
87%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Nothing Phone (2) 评测:价格合理的高端智能手机中的 LED 效果
Florian Schmitt, 2023-08- 6 (Update: 2023-08- 6)