Notebookcheck Logo

华硕ROG手机6和6 Pro评测--可能是最好的游戏智能手机

纯粹的性能。 ROG手机采用了类似的笔记本电脑系列的设计,代表了游戏性能,而没有妥协的口袋形式。华硕再次使用最强大的高通SoC,并首次提供可选的主动冷却。此外,摄像头终于也得到了升级。
5G Gaming Smartphone Touchscreen Android

今年,华硕跳过了S型号,直接为其游戏智能手机配备了高通顶级SoC的改进型号。这是一个很好的决定,因为它不仅具有略微强大的声誉,而且还明显更有效率。

除了新的芯片组,显示屏也得到了改进,提供了更高的刷新率,以及改进的触摸灵敏度。此外,华硕ROG手机6(Pro)现在使用了现代的索尼IMX766图像传感器,也被用于2022年的其他旗舰智能手机中。

Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro (ROG Phone Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio
Graphics adapter
Memory
18 GB 
, LPDDR5
Display
6.78 inch 20.4:9, 2448 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive, 720 Hz touch sampling rate, 23 ms touch latency, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, glossy: yes, HDR, 165 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 512 GB 
, 487 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio port, USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerator, e-compass, proximity, gyro, ultrasonic sensors for AirTrigger 6, grip press detection, OTG
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (band 1, 2, 4, 5/6, 8, 19), LTE Cat. 20 (band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66, 71), 5G Sub6 (band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 10.3 x 173 x 77
Battery
6000 mAh Lithium-Ion, Quick Charge 5.0, PD 3.0 + PPS
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Sony IMX766, f/1.9, 1/1.56", 1.0 µm) + 13 MPix (ultra-wide) + 5 MPix (macro); 8k video, Camera2 API Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (Sony IMX663)
Additional features
Speakers: 5 magnet 12x16 super linear speakers, Keyboard: onscreen, 65W charger, SIM tool, aero case, ROG UI, 24 Months Warranty, GNSS: GPS (L1/L5), GLONASS (L1), Galileo (E1/E5a), BeiDou (B1/B2a), QZSS (L1/L5), NavIC (L5), Widevine L1; SAR: N/A, fanless
Weight
239 g, Power Supply: 195 g
Price
1299 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
89.5 %
01/2023
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
239 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.78"2448x1080
88.7 %
12/2021
Asus ROG Phone 5s
SD 888+ 5G, Adreno 660
238 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.78"2448x1080
85.7 %
06/2022
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
220 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
85 %
03/2022
Nubia RedMagic 7
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
226 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"2400x1080

华硕ROG Phone 6的两个型号看起来与它们的前辈非常相似,可以立即识别为游戏智能手机。标准型和专业型的区别尤其体现在其背面的显示屏上,现在提供60种新的动画。标准型有一个RGB矩阵,而专业型提供一个PMOLED显示屏。标准机型有黑色(幻影黑)和白色(风暴白)两个版本,而ROG Phone 6 Pro只有白色版本。

这两款智能手机的做工都非常好,材料之间的任何缝隙都非常紧密和均匀。箱子对任何试图翘起的行为都没有反应,也不会产生吱吱嘎嘎的声音。我们唯一的小抱怨可能是82%的显示屏与表面的比例,尽管当ROG手机以横向形式握持时,短边的略厚边框可能相当实用,而且边框还容纳了两个前置扬声器。此外,ROG手机的重量不轻,只有239克(约8.4盎司)。

虽然背面有康宁大猩猩3号玻璃保护,但显示屏使用了现代的Victus玻璃。虽然IPX4认证表明所有侧面都有防溅保护,但ROG Phone 6系列的智能手机并不防水。卡盘是由塑料制成的,可以容纳两张Nano-SIM卡。

尺寸比较

173 mm 77 mm 10.3 mm 239 g172.83 mm 77.25 mm 9.9 mm 238 g170.57 mm 78.33 mm 9.5 mm 226 g163.9 mm 76.5 mm 9.5 mm 220 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备 - 带有两个USB接口的智能手机

在设备方面,华硕几乎没有对ROG Phone 5s做任何改变,只是取消了背面的额外触摸传感器。AirTrigger超声波传感器现在包括在第六代中,并且可以再次使用X模式进行配置。它们在游戏时充当额外的输入键,并支持敲击、滑动和推送手势。

底部边缘的USB 2.0端口主要是为了给智能手机充电。长边的端口按照USB 3.2(Gen.2)的规格工作,不仅支持高数据传输率和根据PD 3.0或QuickCharge 5.0标准的快速充电,而且还支持超高清分辨率的有线显示输出。

顶部: 麦克风
顶部: 麦克风
左边:SIM,USB
左边:SIM,USB
对。AirTrigger,音量,电源,AirTrigger
对。AirTrigger,音量,电源,AirTrigger
底部:音频、USB、麦克风
底部:音频、USB、麦克风

软件--ROG手机6 Pro只有两年的更新时间

华硕ROG手机6和6 Pro交付时配备了谷歌Android 12和ROG UI。华硕没有预装很多第三方软件,主要只有Meta和Netflix的一些应用程序。一个重要部分是X模式,允许你配置智能手机的许多组件,如AirTriggers、照明和可选的AeroCooler。

在我们的测试期间,ROG手机定期提供更新,也总是包含一些小的优化。不幸的是,提供更新的期限相对较短,只有两年。

通信和GNSS--在WLAN中功能强大,并能自我定位

华硕ROG手机6支持所有现代通信标准。对于移动通信来说,这意味着5G-Sub6在最好的情况下具有广泛的频段覆盖。专业版机型支持一些额外的频段,并允许在LTE和5G网络中的传输速率略高。至少在理论上是这样的,因为在实践中,高达4.5和4.9Gbit/s的高数值在不久的将来可能仍然无法实现。

在WLAN方面,这款游戏智能手机与我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器相结合,在5-GHz以及6-GHz网络中实现了稳定的高传输率,绝对令人信服。此外,它还支持双Wi-Fi,因此甚至能够同时连接到两个网络。

Networking
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1553 (min: 1451) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1616 (min: 1469) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1730 (min: 1564) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1617 (min: 1593) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone 5s
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 transmit AX12
853 (min: 437) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12
839 (min: 794) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
853 (min: 785) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
943 (min: 893) MBit/s ∼58%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
717 (min: 608) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
227 (min: 74) MBit/s ∼14%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 receive AXE11000
646 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
681 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1543 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1376 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AX12
376 (min: 376) MBit/s ∼45%
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1730 (1564-1806)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1616 (1593-1641)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1551 (1451-1625)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1616 (1469-1714)
GPS测试:在室内
在室内
GPS测试:户外
在户外
GPSTest:支持网络
全球导航卫星系统

ROG Phone 6使用所有习惯的全球卫星导航系统,包括印度的NavIC来确定其位置。即使在室内,卫星fix也能迅速成功,而且准确度令人惊讶。

我们将华硕智能手机与 Garmin Venu 2智能手表进行了一次简短的自行车旅行。两个设备记录的路线长度完全相同,详细的路线记录也没有发现任何弱点,因此我们可以毫无保留地推荐ROG Phone 6用于导航任务。

GNSS测试路线:环湖
GNSS测试路线:环湖
全球导航卫星系统测试路线:转弯环路
全球导航卫星系统测试路线:转弯环路
全球导航卫星系统测试路线:概述
全球导航卫星系统测试路线:概述

电话功能和语音质量

华硕ROG手机6(Pro)的四个集成麦克风确保了良好的语音质量。当把手机放在耳边时,我们对话伙伴的声音听起来很自然,很容易理解。低音量的背景噪音被可靠地过滤掉了。另一方面,嘈杂的环境会导致扭曲的声音再现,尽管没有太多限制可理解性。

华硕智能手机能够接受两张Nano-SIM卡,并支持VoLTE和WLAN通话的可能性。此外,还实现了一个可配置的接听电话的功能。

照相机 - 一个强大的传感器用于游戏智能手机

与华硕ROG手机6 Pro的自拍
与华硕ROG手机6 Pro的自拍

华硕将IMX686传感器用于其主摄像头已经有很长一段时间了,但现在ROG手机6(Pro)终于配备了一个现代化的摄像头传感器。索尼IMX766,与OnePlus 10T中的传感器相同。 一加10TOppo Find X5 Pro也用在这里,应该可以实现更高的图像合成。

在白天,华硕智能手机成功地拍摄了相当有吸引力的照片,这些照片以适当的动态和高水平的细节为特征。2倍或3倍的短距离变焦水平也很有吸引力,但超过这个水平后,照片会变得更加像素化。在弱光条件下,传感器将相当快地达到其极限。

虽然额外的超广角镜头足以应付简单的快照,但在完全放大的水平上,你可以看到许多浑浊的斑点和细节在小像素堆里消失。即使微距镜头的分辨率比其他同类产品略高,我们也注意到一些可见的图像噪音,即使在良好的光线条件下。此外,微距模式必须要手动激活。

在良好的光线条件下,前置摄像头产生平衡的自拍,但在室内已经有明显的图像噪音。它允许以30FPS的超高清分辨率进行视频录制。主摄像头允许以24FPS的8K分辨率或高达60FPS的超高清分辨率进行视频录制。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light
ColorChecker
9.2 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
0.8 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro: 6.72 ∆E min: 0.84 - max: 13.47 ∆E
ColorChecker
30 ∆E
54 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
60.7 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
43.7 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
63.1 ∆E
63.2 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
72.2 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
42 ∆E
78.7 ∆E
70.1 ∆E
52 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro: 46.1 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 78.73 ∆E

配件和保修 - 风扇不在了

制造商在德国为华硕ROG手机6或6 Pro提供24个月的保修。

所含配件没有区别,这两款智能手机精心设计的包装包括一个塑料外壳、一个模块化的65瓦充电器和一条USB-C电缆。因此,专业型不包括可附加的AeroActive冷却器了,它必须单独购买。

新的AeroActive Cooler 6比上一代产品大得多。除了冷却功能,它还有四个额外的控制键和可折叠的支架,提供了额外的价值,但也会变得相当响亮,最高可达45分贝(A)。然而,与RedMagic 7的内部风扇形成鲜明对比的是 RedMagic 7的内部风扇相比,这里的风扇不会产生类似的高频噪音,所以它不会那么令人讨厌。

华硕还提供了额外的配件,包括可连接的控制器、完整的对接站等。

输入设备和操作 - ROG Phone 6的720赫兹触摸采样率

一个快速的触摸屏对游戏智能手机来说是至关重要的,所以华硕将触摸采样率提高到720赫兹,并承诺了极小的响应延迟。康宁大猩猩玻璃Victus表面的滑动特性非常好,几乎没有给手指带来任何阻力。右侧的两个额外的超声波键(AirTrigger 6)可以取代一些屏幕上的控制,使手覆盖的显示表面更少。

在生物识别安全方面,一个光学指纹传感器被安置在显示屏的下方。它提供了非常好的识别率,并迅速解锁华硕ROG手机6(Pro)。额外的或替代的人脸识别选项也是如此,但这不太安全。

有了华硕的BackTap,在背面有一个额外的传感器区域,允许你执行额外的命令,如创建屏幕截图或打开相机应用程序。集成的屏幕记录器提供1080p的记录,最高可达120FPS。

显示屏 - 超亮的AMOLED,频率高达165 Hz

子像素网格
子像素网格

在外形和分辨率方面,6.78英寸AMOLED显示屏与前代产品相同。然而,华硕已经明显提高了亮度。使用相同面板的ROG Phone 6和6 Pro,在纯白显示下,平均达到868 cd/m²。但这只有在激活亮度传感器时才能实现,如果你手动调整亮度,它仍然可以达到549 cd/m²。峰值亮度是在亮区和暗区均匀分布的情况下达到的(APL18),上升到1321 cd/m²,比 ROG Phone 5s并且最适合显示HDR内容。

刷新率可以上升到165赫兹。然而,这不是一个LTPO面板,因此,最小的刷新率可能是在60赫兹。当自动控制被激活时,系统在60和120赫兹之间切换。只有在X模式下,才会增加到144或165 Hz。另外,也可以在设置中手动调整所需的刷新率。

华硕ROG手机6(Pro)也不能幸免于OLED的典型闪烁。在最小的显示亮度下--顺便说一下,它变成了相对较高的亮度--显示屏在220.2和672.1赫兹之间相当不规则地闪烁。这些不规则的变化会给敏感的用户带来一些困难。只有在面板亮度高于150cd/m²(73%)的情况下,我们才会测量到一个恒定的165Hz。也可以选择直流调光模式,但它只在60赫兹下工作。

856
cd/m²
866
cd/m²
872
cd/m²
863
cd/m²
860
cd/m²
873
cd/m²
875
cd/m²
867
cd/m²
882
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 882 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 868.2 cd/m² Minimum: 6.68 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 860 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.08
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
AMOLED, 2448x1080, 6.78
Asus ROG Phone 5s
AMOLED, 2448x1080, 6.78
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Nubia RedMagic 7
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.80
Screen
12%
-44%
-44%
Brightness middle
860
749
-13%
642
-25%
683
-21%
Brightness
868
750
-14%
637
-27%
685
-21%
Brightness Distribution
97
97
0%
96
-1%
95
-2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.4
1.4
42%
3.19
-33%
3.6
-50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.9
2.8
28%
7.12
-83%
6.7
-72%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.5
1.8
28%
4.9
-96%
5
-100%
Gamma
2.08 106%
2.29 96%
2.22 99%
2.14 103%
CCT
6640 98%
6602 98%
7671 85%
7537 86%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 672.1 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 672.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 672.1 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最小面板亮度
分钟。
25%的面板亮度
25%
50%的面板亮度
50%
75%的面板亮度
75%
最大的手动面板亮度
100%

用固定的变焦水平和各种亮度设置进行系列测量

在与CalMAN的分析中,华硕ROG手机6在交付状态下显示出相当冷的色彩再现。那些喜欢更自然的色彩再现的人可以通过选择自然配置文件和暖白平衡来获得这种效果。

灰度(配置文件:自然;白平衡:最大暖;目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)。
灰度(配置文件:自然;白平衡:最大暖;目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)。
颜色(配置文件:自然;白平衡:最大温暖;目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)。
颜色(配置文件:自然;白平衡:最大温暖;目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)。
色彩空间(配置文件:自然;白平衡:最大暖色;目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)。
色彩空间(配置文件:自然;白平衡:最大暖色;目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)。
饱和度(配置文件:自然;白平衡:最大暖;目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)。
饱和度(配置文件:自然;白平衡:最大暖;目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
0.998 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.4794 ms rise
↘ 0.5186 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.042 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5158 ms rise
↘ 0.5258 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

在户外,ROG 6系列的智能手机提供了良好的可读性,甚至拥有足够的储备来应对明亮的夏日。 然而,有时亮度传感器需要一段时间来响应新的照明情况。

华硕智能手机的视角稳定性非常好,从陡峭的视角看去,只有亮度略有下降。

户外活动
户外活动
视角稳定
视角稳定

性能--ROG手机6中的骁龙8+ Gen 1

ROG Phone 6系列的智能手机均采用了 骁龙8+第一代.另一方面,RAM设备根据型号的不同而不同,有12、16和18GB的工作内存,后者为Pro型号保留。但不幸的是,我们在基准测试中没有看到更大内存量带来的优势。

虽然在CPU速度方面的性能提升仍在限制范围内,但新的SoC在人工智能计算方面的速度比其 骁龙8代1前代产品。然而,高通公司在CPU方面也只做了很少的改变,只将Prime核心的时钟速度提高了约200MHz。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Asus ROG Phone 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
1324 Points +1%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
1309 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (897 - 1389, n=23)
1280 Points -2%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1257 Points -4%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
1244 Points -5%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1236 Points -6%
Asus ROG Phone 5s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
1156 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=214, last 2 years)
900 Points -31%
Multi-Core
Asus ROG Phone 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
4179 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (3782 - 4436, n=23)
4173 Points 0%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
4162 Points
Nubia RedMagic 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
3813 Points -8%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3742 Points -10%
Asus ROG Phone 5s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
3668 Points -12%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3488 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=214, last 2 years)
2947 Points -29%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
1119358 Points
Asus ROG Phone 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
1115017 Points 0%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
1041980 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (782013 - 1119358, n=21)
997518 Points -11%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
856953 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=151, last 2 years)
738649 Points -34%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
17727 Points
Asus ROG Phone 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
17377 Points -2%
Asus ROG Phone 5s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
16592 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (11029 - 17727, n=22)
14796 Points -17%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
13295 Points -25%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12578 Points -29%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12144 Points -31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=209, last 2 years)
11643 Points -34%
CrossMark - Overall
Asus ROG Phone 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
1130 Points 0%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
1128 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (749 - 1178, n=21)
1033 Points -8%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
956 Points -15%
Asus ROG Phone 5s
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
916 Points -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=160, last 2 years)
830 Points -26%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Asus ROG Phone 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
8753 Points +4%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
8406 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (5642 - 8753, n=21)
7507 Points -11%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6799 Points -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=162, last 2 years)
5686 Points -32%
System
Asus ROG Phone 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
13119 Points +1%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
12962 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (8750 - 13563, n=21)
11842 Points -9%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10340 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=162, last 2 years)
9595 Points -26%
Memory
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
9017 Points
Asus ROG Phone 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
8886 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (3871 - 9114, n=21)
7549 Points -16%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6523 Points -28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12306, n=162, last 2 years)
6206 Points -31%
Graphics
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
26660 Points
Asus ROG Phone 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
26312 Points -1%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
21944 Points -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (16742 - 26660, n=21)
21295 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=162, last 2 years)
13856 Points -48%
Web
Asus ROG Phone 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
1914 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (1198 - 2006, n=21)
1713 Points +7%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
1602 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=162, last 2 years)
1487 Points -7%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1444 Points -10%
AImark - Score v2.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (1043 - 139804, n=54, last 2 years)
20600 Points +203%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
6805 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (1043 - 7865, n=11)
6385 Points -6%
Asus ROG Phone 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
5995 Points -12%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
5982 Points -12%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432
82801 Points
Asus ROG Phone 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
81966 Points -1%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
68880 Points -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (3291 - 84787, n=19)
47040 Points -43%
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=146, last 2 years)
21887 Points -74%

从名义上看, Adreno 730已经被用在 骁龙8代1但在Plus型号中,其时钟速度应该会高出10%。我们的基准测试也证实了这一点,显示增幅在8%到11%之间。

然而,有趣的是,ROG手机6 Pro在GFXBench测试中只达到了比它应该达到的更低的帧率,明显落后于手机6。 其中一个原因可能是额外的两千兆字节的工作内存,因为该SoC名义上只支持高达16GB的内存。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2760 Points
Asus ROG Phone 6
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2757 Points 0%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2549 Points -8%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2534 Points -8%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2523 Points -9%
Asus ROG Phone 5s
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1532 Points -44%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2818 Points
Asus ROG Phone 6
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2803 Points -1%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2606 Points -8%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2604 Points -8%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2575 Points -9%
Asus ROG Phone 5s
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1538 Points -45%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11024 Points
Asus ROG Phone 6
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10984 Points 0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10238 Points -7%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10185 Points -8%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10175 Points -8%
Asus ROG Phone 5s
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5824 Points -47%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Nubia RedMagic 7
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10062 Points
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9826 Points
Asus ROG Phone 5s
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5818 Points
Asus ROG Phone 6
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Asus ROG Phone 5s
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5087 Points +7%
Asus ROG Phone 6
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4794 Points +1%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4771 Points +1%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4743 Points
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3902 Points -18%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20955 Points
Asus ROG Phone 6
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20490 Points -2%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19364 Points -8%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18090 Points -14%
Asus ROG Phone 5s
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12752 Points -39%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11909 Points
Asus ROG Phone 6
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11861 Points 0%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11528 Points -3%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10005 Points -16%
Asus ROG Phone 5s
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9553 Points -20%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13341 Points
Asus ROG Phone 6
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13244 Points -1%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13121 Points -2%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12123 Points -9%
Asus ROG Phone 5s
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11389 Points -15%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
27751 Points
Asus ROG Phone 6
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
27490 Points -1%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
25906 Points -7%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
25285 Points -9%
Asus ROG Phone 5s
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
17018 Points -39%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Asus ROG Phone 5s
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5278 Points +11%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4811 Points +2%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4735 Points
Asus ROG Phone 6
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4707 Points -1%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4296 Points -9%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 6
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
165 fps 0%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
165 fps
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -64%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
380 fps +7%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
356 fps
Asus ROG Phone 6
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
352 fps -1%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Asus ROG Phone 6
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
161 fps +6%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
152 fps
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -61%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Asus ROG Phone 6
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
213 fps +3%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
206 fps
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
181 fps -12%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 6
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
136 fps +21%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Asus ROG Phone 6
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
173 fps +29%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
134 fps
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
111 fps -17%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 6
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
83 fps 0%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
83 fps
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps -53%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Asus ROG Phone 6
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
102 fps +36%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps -16%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 6
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps +3%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps
Nubia RedMagic 7
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -3%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps -6%
Asus ROG Phone 5s
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
41 fps -34%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps -42%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Asus ROG Phone 6
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps +44%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47 fps +31%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps +11%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps
Asus ROG Phone 5s
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps -17%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps -47%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 6
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
104 fps +41%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps +20%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps
Asus ROG Phone 5s
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps -12%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps -28%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps -42%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Asus ROG Phone 6
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
136 fps +40%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
123 fps +27%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97 fps
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
94 fps -3%
Asus ROG Phone 5s
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps -16%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -38%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro (Chrome 103)
144.7 Points
Asus ROG Phone 6 (Chrome 103)
143.998 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (76.2 - 178.5, n=21)
121.1 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=170, last 2 years)
103.9 Points -28%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
103 Points -29%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Asus ROG Phone 6 (Chrome 103)
128 runs/min 0%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro (Chrome 103)
128 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (69.1 - 167, n=16)
111.4 runs/min -13%
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=154, last 2 years)
104.4 runs/min -18%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
104 runs/min -19%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro (Chrome 103)
53898 Points
Asus ROG Phone 6 (Chrome 103)
53534 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (17622 - 55611, n=22)
41373 Points -23%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
38407 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=205, last 2 years)
33314 Points -38%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=168, last 2 years)
1658 ms * -90%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
1125 ms * -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (729 - 1707, n=20)
1047 ms * -20%
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro (Chrome 103)
874.2 ms *
Asus ROG Phone 6 (Chrome 103)
763 ms * +13%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro (Chrome 103)
195 Points
Asus ROG Phone 6 (Chrome 103)
187 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (106 - 224, n=14)
159.4 Points -18%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
133 Points -32%
Average of class Smartphone (37 - 304, n=119, last 2 years)
131 Points -33%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro (Chrome 103)
142 Points
Asus ROG Phone 6 (Chrome 103)
138 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (69 - 159, n=19)
111 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=153, last 2 years)
98.7 Points -30%
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
190.4 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
190.4 ms * -0%
Average of class Smartphone (55.7 - 303, n=9, last 2 years)
181.7 ms * +5%

* ... smaller is better

Asus ROG Phone 6 ProAsus ROG Phone 5sXiaomi Black Shark 5 ProNubia RedMagic 7Average 512 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-21%
3%
-15%
-15%
-28%
Sequential Read 256KB
1949.16
1972
1%
1945.4
0%
1750
-10%
1877 ?(1695 - 2023, n=23)
-4%
1471 ?(215 - 4512, n=213, last 2 years)
-25%
Sequential Write 256KB
1454.5
770
-47%
1485.2
2%
1260
-13%
1156 ?(575 - 1876, n=23)
-21%
1084 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=213, last 2 years)
-25%
Random Read 4KB
297.48
297.8
0%
344.9
16%
306.2
3%
281 ?(208 - 386, n=23)
-6%
243 ?(22.2 - 543, n=213, last 2 years)
-18%
Random Write 4KB
459.66
287.2
-38%
424.8
-8%
282.5
-39%
333 ?(221 - 503, n=23)
-28%
267 ?(13 - 709, n=213, last 2 years)
-42%

游戏--华硕释放出游戏兽性

我们使用GameBench在不添加外部风扇的情况下评估华硕ROG Phone 6(Pro)的游戏特性。然而,这款游戏智能手机在持续的负载下仍然没有显示出任何弱点,也没有要求在性能和显示质量之间做出任何妥协。

与前代产品相比,我们无法在所有游戏中挑出全帧率。例如,在系统更新后,我们在PUBG的最低图形水平下不再有90 FPS,而是只有60 FPS。同样,在Armajet中,也无法说服华硕智能手机显示超过30FPS。但华硕在未来肯定还是会在这里提供一些改进。

英雄联盟。野生裂缝
英雄联盟。野生裂缝
使命召唤》手机版
使命召唤》手机版
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Asus ROG Phone 6 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø29.8 (29-30)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Call of Duty Mobile; low; 1.0.34: Ø90.5 (88-91)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Call of Duty Mobile; very high; 1.0.34: Ø59.8 (55-60)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; League of Legends: Wild Rift; lowest; 3.3.0.5735: Ø108.6 (68-120)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; League of Legends: Wild Rift; max; 3.3.0.5735: Ø60 (57-61)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.1.0: Ø59.4 (50-61)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.1.0: Ø59.5 (51-61)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.1.0: Ø59.9 (57-61)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 2.1.0: Ø39.9 (39-41)

排放--ROG手机6喜欢高温和噪音

温度

SoC被放在中间(图片:华硕)。
SoC被放在中间(图片:华硕)。

华硕ROG手机6和6 Pro的表面温度在空闲运行时略有升高,但在一些负载下几乎没有增加。然而,在重负荷下,例如在3DMark的压力测试中,我们测量到框架中的一些最高值高达50℃(122°),这看起来是不同的。但在风扇的帮助下,表面也能得到相应的冷却。

华硕将Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1置于机箱中央,以便能够将可选的AeroActive冷却器置于其正上方。在3DMark压力测试中,这不仅使手指更加凉爽,而且帧率也绝对稳定。但即使没有额外的冷却风扇,ROG智能手机的冷却概念也足以在相对较长的时间内保持长期的性能。从长远来看,ROG手机6甚至比iPhone 13 Pro更快。

Max. Load
 35.2 °C36.6 °C36 °C 
 34.7 °C36.3 °C37 °C 
 34.5 °C35.7 °C35.5 °C 
Maximum: 37 °C
Average: 35.7 °C
33.6 °C34.3 °C34.6 °C
34.3 °C35.4 °C34.6 °C
33.4 °C34.8 °C33.6 °C
Maximum: 35.4 °C
Average: 34.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  32 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95.2 %
Asus ROG Phone 5s
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89.3 % -6%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
86.3 % -9%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 % -17%
Asus ROG Phone 6
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68.6 % -28%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.4 %
Asus ROG Phone 6
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
92 % -7%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
91.5 % -8%
Asus ROG Phone 5s
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89.1 % -10%
05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; with Fan: Ø16.7 (16.6-16.7)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; without Fan: Ø16.2 (15.4-16.7)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; without Fan: Ø61.5 (59.8-62.8)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; without Fan: Ø56.6 (43-62.7)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; with Fan: Ø65.7 (65.6-66.1)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; without Fan: Ø65.7 (64-66)

发言人

华硕ROG手机6的声音令人印象深刻。它提供了两个非常好的扬声器,不仅可以变得非常响亮,而且还能提供令人惊讶的低音。

集成的音频端口是我们迄今为止在智能手机中看到的最好的一个。在我们的测试中,它显示自己绝对没有噪音(信噪比:110,62 dBFS)。那些喜欢无线耳机或扬声器的人可以通过蓝牙利用所有常见的音频编解码器(SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX自适应、aptX TWS+、LDAC)。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.640.3252944.43127.841.24025.845.45032.547.96322.446.28024.548.510019.449.312516.552.616018.458.720012.858.42509.958.331511.363.140013.163.950011.473.26301177.280011.680.7100012.381.212501282.1160012.482.8200012.283.625001383.4315012.881.5400013.280.9500013.480.4630013.882.5800013.379.31000013.372.91250013.567.61600013.161.3SPL24.993.3N0.6101.6median 13median 79.3Delta0.88.839.242.133.939273032.428.1363230.928.319.429.519.939.115.544.615.949.912.350.312.955.712.957.49.960.210.266.313.468.61773.814.275.512.87711.776.610.276.411.676.113731574.31673.914.669.615.270.815.970.916.368.316.652.726.286.20.765.9median 14.2median 69.61.98.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ROG Phone 6 ProXiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 6,000毫安时,运行时间长

消耗功率

华硕ROG Phone 6 Pro的功耗不明显,而且非常低,特别是在空闲运行期间。

在调整显示亮度的测试中,尽管它的性能更高,但它显示的功耗与前代产品相似。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.07 / 0.23 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.8 / 1.31 / 1.36 Watt
Load midlight 3.77 / 7.04 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1: Ø5.76 (1.02-11.1)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G: Ø6.02 (1.174-11.2)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.2 (9.9-10.5)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.5 (9.84-11)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.178 (1.119-1.31)
Asus ROG Phone 5 Ultimate Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.267 (0.977-1.686)

电池寿命

我们在显示屏亮度为150cd/m²的情况下测试了华硕智能手机的电池寿命。当我们以60赫兹的固定刷新率和直流调光运行华硕ROG手机6 Pro时,ROG手机6以165赫兹运行。

如果我们不使用增加的刷新率,Pro型号的电池(2 x 3000 mAh)可以多持续近2小时。然而,我们也需要提到,ROG手机6的16小时也代表了一个优秀的结果。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (60 Hz, Chrome 103)
18h 17min
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1097 min
Asus ROG Phone 6
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
899 min -18%
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
752 min -31%
Asus ROG Phone 5s
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
734 min -33%
Nubia RedMagic 7
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
667 min -39%

Pros

+ 性能高而稳定
+ 明亮、快速、准确的amoled显示屏
+ 非常快的双无线网络
+ 非常好的电池寿命
+ 清晰的音频端口与四路DAC
+ 强大的扬声器

Cons

- 没有无线充电
- 沉重
- 只有两年的更新
- 最小显示亮度太高

结论 - 华硕的玩家变得更加出色

测试华硕ROG手机6和6 Pro。测试单位由德国华硕提供。
测试华硕ROG手机6和6 Pro。测试单位由德国华硕提供。

ROG Phone 6系列呈现为其前辈的成功和深思熟虑的进步。华硕再次成功地管理了高通公司的顶级SoC,即使没有主动冷却系统。有了可安装的AeroActive冷却器,就有了一个选项,可以使用 骁龙8+ Gen 1几乎没有任何性能上的损失。

同样包括AirTrigger超声波传感器。显示屏不仅变得更亮,而且现在还提供高达165赫兹的刷新率以及720赫兹的触摸采样率。此外,相机设置也得到了改进,采用了一个新的主传感器,也被用于其他旗舰智能手机。

华硕ROG手机6和6 Pro在那些不喜欢妥协的游戏玩家心中产生了一些热情。

然而,型号的选择至少是有问题的。ROG Phone 6和专业版之间的差异不是特别大。后者只提供了额外的2GB内存,背面的PMOLED显示屏,以及一些更多的移动通信频率。但我们的测试表明,额外的工作内存并没有带来任何优势。因此,那些不一定需要PMOLED显示屏的人也可以安全地选择两个非专业机型中的一个。

强大的替代品是 黑鲨5专业版RedMagic 7.后者甚至提供了一个集成风扇。一个实惠的选择是 Poco F4 GT,但你必须在所有方面做出一些妥协。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

华硕ROG Phone 6智能手机的所有配置都在华硕在线商店中列出。(价格目前没有列出),你也可以从亚马逊购买。,例如。

Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro - 08/30/2022 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
86%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
99%
Connectivity
73 / 70 → 100%
Weight
87%
Battery
92%
Display
91%
Games Performance
71 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
93 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
81 / 90 → 90%
Camera
72%
Average
85%
90%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华硕ROG手机6和6 Pro评测--可能是最好的游戏智能手机
Daniel Schmidt, 2022-08-21 (Update: 2022-08-21)