Notebookcheck Logo

谷歌Pixel 7评测--小巧的谷歌智能手机没有大的折衷方案

强大的机器人 谷歌Pixel 7系列机型中较小的机型不仅拥有比专业机型更紧凑的外形,而且在技术方面也不得不做出一些妥协。它们是什么,在日常使用中是否明显,请在我们的评论中了解。
5G Android ARM Google Pixel Smartphone Touchscreen

随着Pixel 7的推出,谷歌并没有放弃去年的智能手机概念,并通过它提供了一个直接的继任者。 像素6.再一次,这款智能手机比更昂贵的Pixel 7更紧凑。 专业机型.这反映在较小的显示屏上,该显示屏也以较低的刷新率运行。除此之外,Pixel 7的内存也较小,相机没有光学变焦,电池也较小。

关于内部存储,谷歌已经取得了积极的进展。虽然仍然无法通过microSD卡进行扩展,但现在也可以购买256GB的机型,需要额外花费100欧元(103美元)。128GB的基本型号可以以649欧元(665美元)的价格买到。

Google Pixel 7 (Pixel 7 Series)
Processor
Google Tensor G2 8 x 1.8 - 2.9 GHz, Exynos X1 / Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G710 MP7
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR5
Display
6.30 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 418 PPI, capacitive, 10 point multi-touch, OLED, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, glossy: yes, HDR, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 114 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity, Accelerometer, Magnetometer, Gyroscope, Pressure, OTG
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band: 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.7 x 155.6 x 73.2
Battery
4355 mAh Lithium-Ion, USB-PD 3.0, 12W/20W wireless charging
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Samsung GN1, 1/1.31", 1.2 µm, 82°, f/1.85, OIS, aspect ratio: 4:3, 16:9) + 12 MP (Ultra Wide, 1.25 µm, 114°, f/2.2); UHD video (up to 60 FPS); Camera2-API-Level: Full
Secondary Camera: 10.8 MPix (1.22 µm, 92.8°, f/2.2, Fixfocus)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, OTG adapter, USB-C cable, 24 Months Warranty, GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1, E5a), BeiDou (B1, B2a), QZSS, NavIC (L5); Body-SAR: 1.40 W/kg, Head-SAR: 0.99 W/kg; DRM Widevine L1; IP68, fanless, waterproof
Weight
197 g
Price
649 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88.5 %
11/2022
Google Pixel 7
Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7
197 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.30"2400x1080
89.2 %
10/2022
Apple iPhone 14
A15, A15 GPU 5-Core
172 g128 GB NVMe6.10"2532x1170
87.4 %
10/2022
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
SD 888+ 5G, Adreno 660
172 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.55"2400x1080
87.4 %
12/2021
Google Pixel 6
Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20
207 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.40"2400x1080
09/2022
Sony Xperia 5 IV
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
172 g6.10"2520x1080
89.3 %
05/2022
Samsung Galaxy S22
Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920
167 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"2340x1080
谷歌Pixel 7的颜色变体
谷歌Pixel 7的颜色变体

谷歌Pixel 7拥有与其前代相似的设计。 具备与前代相似的设计然而,摄像头的凸起现在是由一体式哑光铝框制成的,这无疑增强了其外观。这款智能手机有黑曜石(黑色)、白雪(白色)和柠檬草三种颜色可供选择。

由于相机的宽大切口,智能手机在平坦的表面上不会晃动,但倾斜度足以走得很远,甚至在轻微的倾斜上也是如此。这主要是由于康宁大猩猩玻璃Victus的光滑表面,它装饰了该设备的正面和背面。

Pixel 7具有良好的制造质量,智能手机给人以高质量的印象,而且手感良好。总体而言,该设备做工精良,框架、前部和后部之间没有任何小缝隙。然而,在我们的测试设备上,后侧并不总是均匀的。特别是,在玻璃过渡到铝的地方。相比之下,SIM卡插槽与边框平齐。

Pixel 7的电池是不可拆卸的,用户无法更换。这款智能手机的防水和防尘等级为IP68。

尺寸比较

158.6 mm 74.8 mm 8.9 mm 207 g158.48 mm 71.99 mm 7.45 mm 172 g155.6 mm 73.2 mm 8.7 mm 197 g156 mm 68 mm 8.2 mm 172 g146.7 mm 71.5 mm 7.8 mm 172 g146 mm 70.6 mm 7.6 mm 167 g

设备--Pixel 7必须要有UWB才行

与上一代产品一样,谷歌Pixel 7缺乏耳机插孔、红外辐射器、调频收音机以及以microSD卡形式的内存扩展。后者更容易被接受,因为现在有了256GB的内部存储空间的机型。

谷歌Pixel 7有一个快速的USB 3.2端口(第二代),允许高数据速度,支持OTG,但不支持有线视频输出。蓝牙5.2和NFC也包括在内,UWB是Pixel 7 Pro独有的功能。像素7专业版.

顶视图:麦克风
顶视图:麦克风
左边:SIM卡插槽
左边:SIM卡插槽
右边:电源键,音量摇杆
右边:电源键,音量摇杆
底部视图:扬声器、USB、麦克风
底部视图:扬声器、USB、麦克风

软件 -Android 智能手机,更新周期长

Pixel 7搭载了Android 13,并有可能获得三个版本的升级,包括Android 16。此后,安全补丁将继续分发,至少还有两年。谷歌在一个相应的页面上提供了进一步的信息,你可以在这里找到https://support.google.com/pixelphone/answer/4457705.

Pixel 7上看不到臃肿的软件,只预装了公司自己的应用程序。此外,还提供了实时翻译和现在播放等Pixel独家功能。此外,在12月,Pixel 7还将获得免费的谷歌VPN。

通信和GNSS - Pixel 7的Sub 6GHz 5G和Wi-Fi 6E

谷歌Pixel 7支持所有常见的移动网络标准,包括Sub 6GHz 5G。德国电信和沃达丰在城市地区的接收特性都非常好。

关于Wi-Fi连接,存在与Pixel 7 Pro相同的问题,因为该智能手机无法识别我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器的6GHz频段。当然,这将通过更新得到解决。一旦出现这种情况,我们将在以后重新检查相应的测量。然而,我们能够在5GHz频率上用WiFi 6实现非常高和稳定的传输率。

Networking
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
904 (min: 816) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
936 (min: 863) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
iperf3 receive AXE11000
746 (min: 642) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
894 (min: 834) MBit/s ∼96%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
775 (min: 699) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
844 (min: 744) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1670 (min: 610) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
800 (min: 597) MBit/s ∼51%
Google Pixel 6
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 transmit AX12
802 (min: 421) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12
895 (min: 870) MBit/s ∼100%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1
iperf3 receive AXE11000
582 (min: 509) MBit/s ∼64%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
918 (min: 876) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1728 (min: 880) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1563 (min: 1447) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
763 (min: 386) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
823 (min: 418) MBit/s ∼88%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 receive AXE11000
604 (min: 44.3) MBit/s ∼67%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
651 (min: 57.7) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1407 (min: 853) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1284 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 transmit AX12
488 (min: 5.59) MBit/s ∼61%
iperf3 receive AX12
461 (min: 15.5) MBit/s ∼52%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
Google Pixel 7 Google Tensor G2, ARM Mali-G710 MP7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø903 (816-917)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø750 (386-780)
Google Pixel 7 Google Tensor G2, ARM Mali-G710 MP7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø936 (863-963)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø809 (418-852)
GPS测试。室外
户外活动
GPS测试。在室内
在室内
GPS测试。支持的GNSS网络
全球导航卫星系统

谷歌Pixel 7使用双频GNSS来确定其位置,并支持所有常用网络。在户外,卫星定位工作非常迅速和精确。在室内,它需要的时间稍长,但也能准确地工作。

我们将这款智能手机与 Garmin Venu 2进行了一次简短的自行车旅行。两台设备所确定的路线几乎完全相同。只有看一下详细的路线记录,才能发现其中的差别。在绕过一个湖泊时,Pixel更准确地记录了覆盖的路线,但智能手表在转圈时更精确。

全球卫星导航系统测试之旅。绕湖而行
全球卫星导航系统测试之旅。绕湖而行
全球卫星导航系统测试之旅。转弯回路
全球卫星导航系统测试之旅。转弯回路
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅。总结
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅。总结

电话功能和通话质量

谷歌Pixel 7是一款双SIM卡智能手机,为物理nano-SIM卡以及eSIM卡提供空间。2023年3月,将以更新的形式提供双eSIM支持。支持VoLTE和Wi-Fi通话等功能,但不支持系统方的SIP账户控制。

在测试过程中,我们对通话质量非常满意,它可以与在 Pixel 7 Pro.将Pixel智能手机放在耳边时,它能非常自然地再现用户的声音。小的背景噪音听不到,也被过滤掉了,质量没有损失。Pixel 7甚至能以令人满意的方式应对繁忙的环境,尽管偶尔会出现背景噪音和用户的声音听起来有点空洞。这种影响在嘈杂的环境中会被放大。

相机--用谷歌的双摄像头拍出有吸引力的照片

与Pixel 7的自拍(照片模式)。
与Pixel 7的自拍(照片模式)。

前置摄像头与Pixel 7 Pro上的摄像头相同。 像素7 Pro提供1080万像素,没有自动对焦功能。在最高设置下,视频可以以60fps的速度录制成UHD格式。然而,使用HDR功能会将帧率限制在30fps。使用广角模式可以拍摄大段的画面。一般来说,我们对白天的拍摄非常满意,在弱光情况下,可以启动夜视模式。

除了5千万像素的主摄像头外,谷歌还在设备后部设置了一个额外的超广角1200万像素的摄像头,与专业机型上的摄像头一样好。这个额外的摄像头的覆盖角度似乎要窄一些,为114°。当涉及到记录质量时,这种差异几乎是难以察觉的,而且Pixel 7的超广角在边缘处也变得有点软。

主摄像头的拍摄效果特别好,尤其是在近距离。距离稍远的物体会出现非常多的背景噪音,景深也会有小幅下降。图像放大仅以数字方式完成。智能手机在8倍变焦时达到极限,质量从平均到混合。然而,两到三倍的放大倍数看起来仍然相当不错。

在最好的情况下,视频以高达60fps的速度记录在UHD中,并可以通过各种稳定选项防止相机抖动。这往往伴随着限制。用于捕捉快速移动的图像,主动模式被限制在全高清。虽然电影效果在4K中可用,但它以较低的帧速率运行。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light

我们在受控的照明条件下仔细观察了Pixel 7的双摄像头。色彩的捕捉非常自然,只有蓝色调--尤其是青色--略有偏差。

测试图是用暖白平衡拍摄的,但尽管如此,细节仍然保持完整,直到边缘。

ColorChecker
5.6 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
3 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
4 ∆E
5 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Google Pixel 7: 4.76 ∆E min: 1.66 - max: 10.41 ∆E
ColorChecker
27.6 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
27.5 ∆E
34.7 ∆E
32.4 ∆E
52 ∆E
38.9 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
28.8 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
47.2 ∆E
49.8 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
37.1 ∆E
22.5 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
34.9 ∆E
43.3 ∆E
46.1 ∆E
44.9 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
25.4 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Google Pixel 7: 33.85 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 52 ∆E

配件和保证 - Pixel 7再次没有充电器

谷歌Pixel 7配备了一条USB-C电缆和一个OTG适配器(Type-C转Type-A)。直接从谷歌购买一个合适的充电器,需要额外支付29欧元。也有无线充电底座,即Pixel Stand,但要花79欧元。此外,谷歌还为其智能手机提供保护性手机壳,每个22欧元。

德国的保修期为24个月,不能延长。

输入设备和操作--现在也有了人脸识别功能

Pixel 7的触摸屏受到康宁大猩猩玻璃的保护,触摸起来非常光滑。触摸感应表面可识别多达10个同时输入的信息,并得到精确执行。

在生物识别安全方面,光学指纹扫描仪再次被内置到显示屏中。它相对较小,但似乎比它的前辈反应更灵敏。许多用户对Pixel 6的传感器的抱怨已被听取,导致要求实施面部识别技术的呼声。谷歌听取了意见,并通过前置摄像头引入了这种功能。这并不像Pixel 4中的3D人脸识别那样安全。 Pixel 4,但却很方便。

振动电机提供了坚实的回报,手感极佳。Pixel 7 Pro中描述的全部无障碍功能和手势。 Pixel 7 Pro中描述的全部功能和手势也适用于Pixel 7。

显示屏 - 谷歌智能手机采用明亮的90Hz OLED

子像素结构
子像素结构

谷歌Pixel 7的OLED显示屏尺寸为6.3英寸(16厘米)。由于具有全高清Plus分辨率,这里使用的面板非常清晰。不同于 专业机型谷歌并没有采用LTPO面板。随着平滑显示功能的激活,系统自动在60和90Hz之间切换。另外,智能手机可以在锁定的60fps下操作。支持常见的HDR标准(HLG、HDR10、HDR10+)。

亮度可以说是平均水平,在激活环境光传感器和显示全表面纯白图像的情况下,达到了947cd/m²的高亮度。我们能够测量到高达1262cd/m²的亮度和暗区的均匀分布(APL18)。当亮度设置为手动时,最大可达到480 cd/m²。

在最低亮度下,OLED显示屏会以相当明显的、不规则的、周期性的方式闪烁,并在90至360Hz之间波动。这增加了对此类问题敏感的用户投诉的可能性。然而,我们无法检测到任何时间上的抖动。为了做到这一点,我们使用240fps慢动作视频(深灰色,最大亮度)通过显微镜观察显示屏。

927
cd/m²
942
cd/m²
952
cd/m²
939
cd/m²
936
cd/m²
948
cd/m²
948
cd/m²
979
cd/m²
951
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 979 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 946.9 cd/m² Minimum: 1.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 936 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.2
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.5
98.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
Google Pixel 7
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.30
Apple iPhone 14
OLED, 2532x1170, 6.10
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
pOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Google Pixel 6
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.40
Sony Xperia 5 IV
OLED, 2520x1080, 6.10
Samsung Galaxy S22
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.10
Screen
-15%
-5%
-17%
-32%
-20%
Brightness middle
936
835
-11%
954
2%
805
-14%
896
-4%
853
-9%
Brightness
947
841
-11%
961
1%
805
-15%
902
-5%
858
-9%
Brightness Distribution
95
97
2%
98
3%
98
3%
97
2%
96
1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.3
1.05
19%
1.5
-15%
1.4
-8%
2
-54%
1.9
-46%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.7
2.81
-4%
2.5
7%
3.7
-37%
6.4
-137%
3.2
-19%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.4
2.6
-86%
1.8
-29%
1.8
-29%
1.3
7%
1.9
-36%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.034 108%
2.24 98%
2.29 96%
2.25 98%
2.07 106%
CCT
6664 98%
6616 98%
6254 104%
6507 100%
6618 98%
6460 101%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 360 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 360 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 360 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19590 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最小显示亮度
闵行区。
25%的显示亮度
25 %
50 %的显示亮度
50 %
75%的显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

使用固定变焦和不同亮度设置进行测量

当在设置中选择颜色配置文件Natural 时,谷歌Pixel 7实现了最平衡的色彩再现。对人眼来说,色彩的再现没有明显的偏差。只有在非常明亮的灰度下才能看出轻微的绿色色调。

灰度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
ColorChecker(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)。
ColorChecker(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)。
色彩空间(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度扫描(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)。
饱和度扫描(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.89 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.9765 ms rise
↘ 0.915 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.61 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.266 ms rise
↘ 2.34 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.9 ms).

在室外,谷歌Pixel 7的显示屏在各种天气条件下都保持可观。在阳光下,表面有点反光,从极端角度看时可能会有点烦人。

户外活动
户外活动
在多云的条件下
在多云的条件下

谷歌Pixel 7的可视角度稳定性非常好。即使在极端角度下观看,也不会有亮度损失。虽然,在OLED的表面可以看到轻微的闪光。

谷歌Pixel 7可视角度稳定
谷歌Pixel 7可视角度稳定

性能--Tensor G2在Pixel 7中努力工作

对于Pixel 7,谷歌依靠的是其第二代内部芯片组,即 Tensor G2.这由8GB的LPDDR5内存支持。从纸面上看,这款略显高端的SoC与前代产品类似,也是在5纳米制造。在CPU性能方面,性能提升也相应较小。

相比之下,人工智能加速的表现要好得多,因为这里可以找到高达50%的性能提升。尽管Tensor G2是一个非常快的SoC,但与竞争对手相比,它排在最后,但仍然可以实现非常流畅的系统导航。

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 14
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1732 Points ∼100% +65%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1181 Points ∼68% +12%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1158 Points ∼67% +10%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1145 Points ∼66% +9%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
1050 Points ∼61%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (1048 - 1050, n=2)
1049 Points ∼61% 0%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
1041 Points ∼60% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1885, n=265, last 2 years)
737 Points ∼43% -30%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 14
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
4733 Points ∼100% +45%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3544 Points ∼75% +9%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
3474 Points ∼73% +6%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
3425 Points ∼72% +5%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
3265 Points ∼69%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (3222 - 3265, n=2)
3244 Points ∼69% -1%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
2805 Points ∼59% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 5538, n=265, last 2 years)
2374 Points ∼50% -27%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
910383 Points ∼100% +18%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
829929 Points ∼91% +7%
Apple iPhone 14
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
829792 Points ∼91% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
813746 Points ∼89% +5%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (773655 - 773857, n=2)
773756 Points ∼85% 0%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
773655 Points ∼85%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
702981 Points ∼77% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (111952 - 1119358, n=160, last 2 years)
584886 Points ∼64% -24%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
14068 Points ∼100% +34%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
12525 Points ∼89% +19%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
12136 Points ∼86% +15%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (10530 - 11397, n=2)
10964 Points ∼78% +4%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
10530 Points ∼75%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
10409 Points ∼74% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 19200, n=213, last 2 years)
10352 Points ∼74% -2%
CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPhone 14
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1180 Points ∼100% +31%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
993 Points ∼84% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
957 Points ∼81% +7%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
898 Points ∼76%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (886 - 898, n=2)
892 Points ∼76% -1%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
849 Points ∼72% -5%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
828 Points ∼70% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (226 - 1332, n=97, last 2 years)
775 Points ∼66% -14%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
7345 Points ∼100% +18%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6991 Points ∼95% +12%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
6382 Points ∼87% +2%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
6287 Points ∼86% +1%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
6247 Points ∼85%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (6164 - 6247, n=2)
6206 Points ∼84% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 8753, n=179, last 2 years)
4625 Points ∼63% -26%
Apple iPhone 14
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
System
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
11336 Points ∼100% +18%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
11210 Points ∼99% +17%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
9864 Points ∼87% +3%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
9601 Points ∼85%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (9294 - 9601, n=2)
9448 Points ∼83% -2%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
9085 Points ∼80% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2083 - 19657, n=179, last 2 years)
8168 Points ∼72% -15%
Apple iPhone 14
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Memory
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
6697 Points ∼100% +24%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
6569 Points ∼98% +22%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6413 Points ∼96% +19%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
6071 Points ∼91% +13%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (5392 - 5456, n=2)
5424 Points ∼81% +1%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
5392 Points ∼81%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 11617, n=179, last 2 years)
5204 Points ∼78% -3%
Apple iPhone 14
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Graphics
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
21477 Points ∼100% +34%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
17269 Points ∼80% +8%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (16001 - 16375, n=2)
16188 Points ∼75% +1%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
16001 Points ∼75%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
15303 Points ∼71% -4%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
14811 Points ∼69% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 26660, n=179, last 2 years)
8925 Points ∼42% -44%
Apple iPhone 14
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1924 Points ∼100% +5%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
1851 Points ∼96% +1%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
1838 Points ∼96%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (1739 - 1838, n=2)
1789 Points ∼93% -3%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1785 Points ∼93% -3%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1728 Points ∼90% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2392, n=179, last 2 years)
1407 Points ∼73% -23%
Apple iPhone 14
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
UL Procyon AI Inference - Overall Score
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
78964 Points ∼100% +86%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (42556 - 42662, n=2)
42609 Points ∼54% 0%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
42556 Points ∼54%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
32339 Points ∼41% -24%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
28581 Points ∼36% -33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=97, last 2 years)
23194 Points ∼29% -45%
AImark - Score v2.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (1043 - 286905, n=156, last 2 years)
51780 Points ∼100% +745%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6487 Points ∼13% +6%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
6131 Points ∼12%
Average Google Tensor G2
  (5976 - 6131, n=2)
6054 Points ∼12% -1%
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192
5723 Points ∼11% -7%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1046 Points ∼2% -83%

在使用OpenGL ES 3.2 API进行的基准测试中,图形芯片--一个ARM Mali-G710 MP7- 在性能上比ARM Mali-G710 MP7有了很大的提高。Mali-G78 MP20.关于Vulkan API,这看起来有些不同。偶尔,旧的GPU甚至有优势。在这方面,谷歌可能将不得不改进其驱动程序。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
2776 Points ∼100% +54%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1
2047 Points ∼74% +14%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1855 Points ∼67% +3%
Google Pixel 6
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1823 Points ∼66% +1%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1800 Points ∼65%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1521 Points ∼55% -15%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
3005 Points ∼100% +63%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1
2488 Points ∼83% +35%
Google Pixel 6
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2067 Points ∼69% +12%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1946 Points ∼65% +6%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1841 Points ∼61%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1519 Points ∼51% -17%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
11779 Points ∼100% +77%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1
9268 Points ∼79% +39%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7458 Points ∼63% +12%
Google Pixel 6
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7064 Points ∼60% +6%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6660 Points ∼57%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5764 Points ∼49% -13%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1
8313 Points ∼100% +28%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7064 Points ∼85% +8%
Google Pixel 6
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6954 Points ∼84% +7%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6513 Points ∼78%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5688 Points ∼68% -13%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
Points ∼0% -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1
3611 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points ∼0%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
Points ∼0%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1
20329 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points ∼0%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
Points ∼0%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1
10020 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points ∼0%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
Points ∼0%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5040 Points ∼100% +23%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4086 Points ∼81%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1
4009 Points ∼80% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4000 Points ∼79% -2%
Google Pixel 6
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3643 Points ∼72% -11%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
Points ∼0% -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1
17859 Points ∼100% +55%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11893 Points ∼67% +3%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11491 Points ∼64%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10930 Points ∼61% -5%
Google Pixel 6
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8605 Points ∼48% -25%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
Points ∼0% -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1
10103 Points ∼100% +23%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8677 Points ∼86% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8268 Points ∼82% +1%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8192 Points ∼81%
Google Pixel 6
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6606 Points ∼65% -19%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
Points ∼0% -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
0 Points
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
0 Points
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps ∼100% +32%
Google Pixel 6
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps ∼76% 0%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps ∼76%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
59.9 fps ∼50% -33%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
446.6 fps ∼100% +79%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
302 fps ∼68% +21%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
249 fps ∼56%
Google Pixel 6
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
144 fps ∼32% -42%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
127 fps ∼100% +41%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps ∼94% +32%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps ∼71%
Google Pixel 6
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 fps ∼62% -12%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1
60 fps ∼47% -33%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
59.9 fps ∼47% -33%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
253 fps ∼100% +92%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
193 fps ∼76% +46%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1
182 fps ∼72% +38%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
141 fps ∼56% +7%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
132 fps ∼52%
Google Pixel 6
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps ∼36% -32%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
113 fps ∼100% +28%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
94 fps ∼83% +7%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
88 fps ∼78%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1
60 fps ∼53% -32%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
59.9 fps ∼53% -32%
Google Pixel 6
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps ∼50% -35%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
172.4 fps ∼100% +94%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
123 fps ∼71% +38%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1
117 fps ∼68% +31%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95 fps ∼55% +7%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps ∼52%
Google Pixel 6
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼35% -33%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼97% -3%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
59.9 fps ∼97% -3%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps ∼85% -15%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1
49 fps ∼79% -21%
Google Pixel 6
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps ∼58% -42%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
105.2 fps ∼100% +55%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps ∼64% -1%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1
66 fps ∼63% -3%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps ∼59% -9%
Google Pixel 6
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps ∼38% -41%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
57.6 fps ∼100% +20%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps ∼89% +6%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps ∼83%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1
41 fps ∼71% -15%
Google Pixel 6
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps ∼69% -17%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps ∼63% -25%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
38.2 fps ∼100% +16%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps ∼76% -12%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1
29 fps ∼76% -12%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
24 fps ∼63% -27%
Google Pixel 6
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps ∼60% -30%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66 fps ∼100% +2%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps ∼98%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps ∼91% -8%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps ∼86% -12%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1
57 fps ∼86% -12%
Google Pixel 6
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47 fps ∼71% -28%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
111.1 fps ∼100% +56%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1
74 fps ∼67% +4%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps ∼60% -6%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps ∼59% -8%
Google Pixel 6
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps ∼44% -31%

在谷歌Pixel 7上浏览网页是一种流畅的体验。与竞争对手相比,这款智能手机处于中间位置,在WebXPRT测试中的结果只是相当低。在这种情况下,这是由于Chrome浏览器的原因,因为微软的Edge在测试中获得了更多的分数。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 14 (Safari 16)
189.85 Points ∼100% +97%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion (Chrome 105)
100.393 Points ∼53% +4%
Average Google Tensor G2 (96.3 - 98.2, n=2)
97.2 Points ∼51% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)
96.4 Points ∼51% 0%
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)
96.314 Points ∼51%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)
90.1 Points ∼47% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (14.8 - 282, n=176, last 2 years)
73.4 Points ∼39% -24%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 14 (Safari 16)
341 runs/min ∼100% +241%
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)
111 runs/min ∼33% +11%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)
104 runs/min ∼30% +4%
Average Google Tensor G2 (100 - 104, n=2)
102 runs/min ∼30% +2%
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)
100 runs/min ∼29%
Sony Xperia 5 IV (Chrome 107)
90.5 runs/min ∼27% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (12.5 - 375, n=163, last 2 years)
70.3 runs/min ∼21% -30%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone 14 (Safari 16)
188 Points ∼100% +102%
Sony Xperia 5 IV (Chrome 107)
114 Points ∼61% +23%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion (Chrome 105)
104 Points ∼55% +12%
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)
93 Points ∼49%
Average Google Tensor G2 (90 - 93, n=2)
91.5 Points ∼49% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (25 - 202, n=53, last 2 years)
88.1 Points ∼47% -5%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 14 (Safari 16)
279 Points ∼100% +185%
Sony Xperia 5 IV (Chrome 107)
174 Points ∼62% +78%
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)
149 Points ∼53% +52%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)
110 Points ∼39% +12%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 292, n=176, last 2 years)
101.9 Points ∼37% +4%
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)
98 Points ∼35%
Average Google Tensor G2 (98 - 98, n=2)
98 Points ∼35% 0%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 14 (Safari 16)
65726 Points ∼100% +46%
Sony Xperia 5 IV (Chrome 107)
45945 Points ∼70% +2%
Google Pixel 7
45158 Points ∼69%
Average Google Tensor G2 (44245 - 45158, n=2)
44702 Points ∼68% -1%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)
43376 Points ∼66% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)
38992 Points ∼59% -14%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion (Chrome 105)
37446 Points ∼57% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (3905 - 74261, n=195, last 2 years)
26805 Points ∼41% -41%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 12437, n=186, last 2 years)
2582 ms * ∼100% -153%
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)
1566 ms * ∼61% -53%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion (Chrome 105)
1117.9 ms * ∼43% -9%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)
1034 ms * ∼40% -1%
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)
1021.8 ms * ∼40%
Average Google Tensor G2 (1012 - 1022, n=2)
1017 ms * ∼39% -0%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
864 ms * ∼33% +15%
Apple iPhone 14 (Safari 16)
496.4 ms * ∼19% +51%

* ... smaller is better

在大多数领域,UFS 3.1存储的速度已经比它的前辈有了很大的提高。 前代产品只有Pixel 7的连续读取速度较慢。虽然与竞争对手相比,它在这一类别中排名最后,但在日常使用中,这一点甚至不太可能被察觉。

Google Pixel 7Motorola Edge 30 FusionGoogle Pixel 6Sony Xperia 5 IVSamsung Galaxy S22Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
13%
-29%
7%
15%
5%
-24%
Sequential Read 256KB
1280.81
1870.18
46%
1546
21%
1474
15%
1486
16%
1565 ?(1030 - 1898, n=43)
22%
993 ?(45.6 - 1999, n=256, last 2 years)
-22%
Sequential Write 256KB
879.39
689.24
-22%
233.4
-73%
997
13%
993
13%
785 ?(233 - 1284, n=43)
-11%
568 ?(11.9 - 1783, n=256, last 2 years)
-35%
Random Read 4KB
210.47
248.86
18%
126.2
-40%
207
-2%
273
30%
239 ?(126.2 - 390, n=43)
14%
183.3 ?(13.5 - 543, n=256, last 2 years)
-13%
Random Write 4KB
253.92
276.74
9%
190.3
-25%
254
0%
257.6
1%
243 ?(121.4 - 503, n=43)
-4%
185.1 ?(18.4 - 503, n=257, last 2 years)
-27%

游戏 - 许多游戏都能顺利播放

芯片 ARM Mali-G710 MP7是一个图形处理器,但谷歌对其潜力进行了限制(最多16个内核)。芯片Tensor G2配备的GPU比联发科提供的 Dimensity 9000+它有一个 G710 MP10.尽管如此,手头的性能足以让人享受几乎所有的游戏,在它的荣耀。

使用GameBench我们能够对一些游戏进行更仔细的分析。PUBG Mobile以非常稳定的40(超级设置)至60fps(高清设置)运行,Wild Rift也没有显示帧数下降。虽然后者被限制在60fps,但它能够支持到120fps。要求不高的游戏,如Battle Bay,也能够利用90Hz显示器的潜力。

在测试屏7 Pro时,我们还尝试了《元神冲击》。为了顺利运行这款要求较高的游戏,无论是细节还是帧率都不得不降低。

英雄联盟。野生裂缝
英雄联盟。野生裂缝
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
战斗湾
战斗湾
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Google Pixel 7; Battle Bay; 4.9.8: Ø90 (89-91)
Google Pixel 7; League of Legends: Wild Rift; 3.4.0.5930: Ø60.2 (59-61)
Google Pixel 7; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.2.0: Ø60 (58-61)
Google Pixel 7; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.2.0: Ø59.9 (58-62)
Google Pixel 7; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 2.2.0: Ø39.9 (36-41)

排放物--谷歌手机变得相当温暖

温度

虽然即使在最大显示亮度下,谷歌Pixel 7的表面温度在空转时仍保持令人愉快的低水平,但在连续负载下,温度最高上升到43.2℃。这是相对较高的温度,但在其他方面是无害的。

谷歌的智能手机内部也变得相当热。3DMark Wild Life(极限)压力测试显示,性能下降高达34%。这并非不重要,但Pixel 7的长期性能仍然比S22更有利。 Galaxy S22拥有稍快的SoC。

Max. Load
 39.4 °C39.4 °C36.6 °C 
 43.2 °C42.5 °C37 °C 
 41.2 °C42.7 °C36.9 °C 
Maximum: 43.2 °C
Average: 39.9 °C
34.8 °C36.7 °C39.5 °C
32.7 °C39 °C39.4 °C
31.5 °C33.1 °C39.3 °C
Maximum: 39.5 °C
Average: 36.2 °C
Room Temperature 21.1 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
84.1 % ∼100% +28%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 % ∼88% +13%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65.5 % ∼78%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1
59.8 % ∼71% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56.4 % ∼67% -14%
Google Pixel 6
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53.1 % ∼63% -19%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77.9 % ∼100% +7%
Apple iPhone 14
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe
75.5 % ∼97% +4%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
72.9 % ∼94%
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1
64.2 % ∼82% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 % ∼72% -23%
Google Pixel 6
Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54.9 % ∼70% -25%
0510152025303540Tooltip
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø9.65 (8.06-11.1)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø7.78 (6.63-11.8)
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø32.8 (25.8-39.3)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø27.2 (23.6-41.9)
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø34.4 (28.6-40.2)

发言人

Pixel 7的扬声器音量适中,在中等音量下能产生令人愉悦的声音。不幸的是,声音越大,就越明显地感觉到中低频的存在感不强。因此,声音缺乏深度。

有线耳机或扬声器可以通过USB-C端口连接。作为一个无线选项,蓝牙5.2是可用的,只支持最常见的音频编解码器(SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、LDAC)。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.532.62526.328.33123.729.74035.926.5503637.16324.923.78020.42410018.523.212516.934.716017.951.1200165125014.150.531512.254.740013.356.750010.966.363012.369.380012.172.5100012.571.6125011.869.9160011.973.5200012.475.3250012.878.6315013.177.140001380.4500013.279.9630013.676800013.674.81000013.777.1125001471.21600013.862.8SPL2588.3N0.672.5median 13.2median 71.2Delta1.510.337.439.52830.932.628.127.7303435.82730.123.630.322.328.317.733.916.148.712.846.813.152.71258.2959.91165.310.768.310.373.510.976.312.178.111.878.61278.811.880.511.980.712.979.113.37713.47113.575.913.669.814.869.614.166.324.689.50.677median 12.8median 69.81.111hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGoogle Pixel 7Samsung Galaxy S22
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Google Pixel 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy S22 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命 - Pixel 7拥有4355毫安时的电池

消耗功率

谷歌Pixel 7的耗电量非常低,没有给我们带来任何批评的理由。

由于没有充电器,应注意使用支持USB PD 3.0的充电器。另外,也可以从谷歌购买一个可选的30W充电器。使用这个,智能手机可以在30分钟内充电到50%。

无线充电和反向无线充电一样可以使用。前者可以达到12W,而谷歌Pixel Stand(第二代)的用户甚至可以为Pixel充电,最高可达20W。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.11 / 0.32 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.89 / 1.07 / 1.2 Watt
Load midlight 3.27 / 5.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Google Pixel 7
4355 mAh
Apple iPhone 14
3279 mAh
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
4400 mAh
Google Pixel 6
4614 mAh
Sony Xperia 5 IV
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S22
3700 mAh
Average Google Tensor G2
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-11%
-21%
-17%
-9%
-34%
-8%
-32%
Idle Minimum *
0.89
0.6
33%
0.83
7%
0.68
24%
0.7
21%
0.69
22%
0.835 ?(0.78 - 0.89, n=2)
6%
0.887 ?(0.12 - 2.5, n=194, last 2 years)
-0%
Idle Average *
1.07
0.8
25%
1.72
-61%
1
7%
1.04
3%
1.19
-11%
1.34 ?(1.07 - 1.61, n=2)
-25%
1.568 ?(0.65 - 3.6, n=194, last 2 years)
-47%
Idle Maximum *
1.2
1
17%
1.75
-46%
1.02
15%
1.15
4%
1.26
-5%
1.415 ?(1.2 - 1.63, n=2)
-18%
1.783 ?(0.69 - 3.7, n=194, last 2 years)
-49%
Load Average *
3.27
5.4
-65%
2.76
16%
5.39
-65%
4.25
-30%
6.97
-113%
3.28 ?(3.27 - 3.29, n=2)
-0%
4.36 ?(2.1 - 7.74, n=194, last 2 years)
-33%
Load Maximum *
5.5
9.2
-67%
6.74
-23%
9
-64%
7.84
-43%
8.85
-61%
5.76 ?(5.5 - 6.01, n=2)
-5%
7.17 ?(3.56 - 11.9, n=194, last 2 years)
-30%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Google Pixel 7 Google Tensor G2: Ø7.34 (1.385-12)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200: Ø6.67 (0.973-15.2)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Google Pixel 7 Google Tensor G2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.99 (7.64-11.5)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.32 (5-16.8)
Google Pixel 7 Google Tensor G2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.907 (0.874-1.166)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.845 (0.79-1.42)

电池寿命

实际上,Pixel 7的电池寿命非常好。然而,在读者测试中,这一点出乎意料地低,该测试模拟了在最低显示亮度下使用浏览器阅读书籍。这很可能可以追溯到Wi-Fi模块的较高消耗。毫无疑问,谷歌将不得不通过一到两次更新在这方面做出改进。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
17h 43min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 107)
12h 11min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
20h 30min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 02min
Google Pixel 7
4355 mAh
Google Pixel 6
4614 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S22
3700 mAh
Apple iPhone 14
3279 mAh
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
4400 mAh
Battery Runtime
18%
19%
48%
-6%
Reader / Idle
1063
2020
90%
2182
105%
2689
153%
H.264
1230
1219
-1%
887
-28%
1266
3%
WiFi v1.3
731
627
-14%
675
-8%
1010
38%
686
-6%
Load
302
291
-4%
324
7%
289
-4%

Pros

+ 明亮而准确的90Hz显示屏
+ 迅捷的系统速度
+ 支持长期更新
+ IP68认证
+ USB 3.2 (第二代)

Cons

- USB-C不支持视频输出
- 仍然没有6GHz的Wi-Fi
- 负载下的节流问题

结论--Pixel 7的性价比很高

已评测。谷歌Pixel 7。评测设备由谷歌德国提供。
已评测。谷歌Pixel 7。评测设备由谷歌德国提供。

Pixel 7巧妙地建立在其前辈的基础上,并一直专注于成为一款价格相对低廉的强大智能手机。这从快速的SoC、非常明亮和色彩准确的OLED显示屏一直延伸到强大的双摄像头。谷歌能够以良好的电池寿命以及长期的更新来完善这一点。此外,他们甚至还提供了Google One的免费VPN。

然而,这还不是全部。在好处方面,还有广泛的移动频率覆盖,包括5G,IP68认证以及无线充电。虽然仍然没有microSD扩展槽,但可以购买一个可选的256GB机型。

谷歌Pixel 7是一个有吸引力的提议,它有一个很好的双摄像头和至少五年的更新。

然而,必须做出一些妥协。特别是,Pixel 7的显示屏对即将到来的Pixel 8仍有很大的潜力,因为它目前的刷新率为90Hz,而且不是LTPO那种。除此之外,谷歌本可以像在Pixel 7 Pro.此外,UWB并不包括在内,超广角相机也没有微距模式。

在这个价格段,好的替代品是 三星Galaxy S22以及摩托罗拉Edge 30 Fusion.这款手机iPhone 14的概念类似,但价格高出350欧元。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

Pixel 7可直接从谷歌商店购买或在 亚马逊.

Google Pixel 7 - 11/18/2022 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
90%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
58 / 70 → 83%
Weight
88%
Battery
90%
Display
94%
Games Performance
59 / 64 → 92%
Application Performance
83 / 86 → 96%
Temperature
89%
Noise
100%
Audio
77 / 90 → 86%
Camera
81%
Average
82%
89%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 谷歌Pixel 7评测--小巧的谷歌智能手机没有大的折衷方案
Daniel Schmidt, 2022-11-22 (Update: 2022-11-22)