小米12T Pro 5G评论。拥有200MP和骁龙8+ Gen1的智能手机，价格诱人

Name: Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G
Brand: Xiaomi

百万像素的疯狂。 小米12T Pro以高端智能手机的价格拥有高端规格。其中包括骁龙8+1代，20万像素摄像头，快速120赫兹AMOLED显示屏，以及120瓦的快速充电功能。继续阅读，了解小米在哪些方面对其旗舰杀手进行了削减。

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 11/27/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android Touchscreen Smartphone

小米的小米12T Pro以有吸引力的价格在许多方面提供了旗舰级功能。它有三个摄像头（包括一个200MP的主摄像头），一个高效的高通Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1，以及其高分辨率（1220p）120赫兹OLED面板，12T Pro不必在竞争中退缩。特别是由于5000毫安时的大电池可以在20分钟内以高达120瓦的功率快速充电，而且交货范围内甚至包括一个配套的充电器。

这家中国制造商在德国将其高端智能手机的建议零售价定为799.90欧元。作为回报，T型机的买家可以获得8GB的内存和256GB的闪存。更大存储容量的变体是不存在的。

Test device courtesy of Xiaomi Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G (12T Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 730

Memory

8 GB

Display

6.67 inch 20:9, 2712 x 1220 pixel 446 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED, 480 Hz touch sampling rate, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB

, 223 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, OTG, miracast, IR Blaster

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66), 5G (n1/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n28/n38/n40/n41/n66/n75/n77/n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.6 x 163.1 x 75.9

Battery

5000 mAh Lithium-Ion

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 12

Camera

Primary Camera: 200 MPix (f/1.69, OIS) + 8.0 MP (f/2.2, wide angle lens) + 2.0 MP (f/2.4, macro lens), camera2 API: level 3
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix (f/2.24)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Onscreen, charger, case, USB cable, Info cards, MIUI 13, 24 Months Warranty, Widevine L1, SAR value- 0.997W/kg Head, 0.997W/kg Body, fanless

Weight

205 g, Power Supply: 219 g

Price

800 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
87.7 %	11/2022	Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730	205 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.67"	2712x1220
88.9 %	05/2022	Samsung Galaxy S22+ Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920	196 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.60"	2340x1080
87 %	08/2022	OnePlus 10T SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730	203.5 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	2412x1080
89.3 %	10/2022	Motorola Edge 30 Ultra SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730	198.5 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080
87.6 %	02/2022	Xiaomi 12 Pro SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	204 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.73"	3200x1440
89.1 %	11/2022	Google Pixel 7 Pro Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7	212 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	3120x1440

外壳 - 小米智能手机没有IP等级

小米12T Pro的设计在视觉上很容易让人想起它的兄弟姐妹，即小米12 Pro，但这款高端智能手机又落在了塑料框架上，而且大猩猩玻璃Victus被更便宜的大猩猩玻璃5取代，以尽量降低成本。不过，该机的建造质量非常好，内置按键在框架中坐得很舒服。指纹残留被背面的哑光表面很好地掩盖了。

与12系列相比，12T Pro的外壳没有官方IP认证。这款高端智能手机在多大程度上是密封的，以便与水接触不会造成什么危险，我们不知道。但SIM卡插槽有一个橙色点缀的橡胶挡板。

小米12 Pro和12T Pro的外形尺寸几乎相同，这意味着T型机也相当大。由于屏幕边缘适中，显示屏与正面的比例为86.7%，虽然小米12 Pro的显示屏边缘 12 Pro甚至更薄。

尺寸比较

设备 - 小米12T专业版，带红外辐射器

12T Pro提供快速的256GB UFS 3.1存储。由于操作系统和一些预装的应用程序，实际可用存储空间较低，为223GB。那些需要更多空间存放视频或照片的人，只能通过USB OTG使用记忆棒等外部外设，因为通过micoSD卡进行内存扩展是不可能的。

与12专业版。12T Pro的USB-C端口只有2.0标准，这意味着高端智能手机不可能进行有线图像输出。另一方面，通过Miracast将显示内容无线传输到外部显示器是可能的，由于Widevine L1的存在，流媒体服务的视频内容可以以高清质量观看。

12T Pro的其他功能包括一个红外发射器、一个色温传感器、用于非接触式支付的NFC和蓝牙5.2。

软件 - 小米智能手机有4年的更新时间

小米在第13版中将Android 操作系统与内部的MIUI用户界面相结合，该版本仍基于Android 12。但从2022年10月开始的安全补丁是相当最新的。

小米12系列的更新保证，即三个主要的Android 更新和四年的安全更新，也适用于T系列--因此小米的高端智能手机将更新到Android 15。在Android 领域，三星在其S系列中更胜一筹。购买Galaxy S22 的人将获得四个主要的Android 更新以及五年的安全补丁。

通信与GNSS - 小米智能手机，带Wi-Fi 6

小米12T Pro部署了MIMO方法，以确保一流的5G和Wi-Fi接收。正如这个价格区间的智能手机所预期的那样，这款高端智能手机使用了Wi-Fi 6，但6千兆赫兹频段不能用于WLAN传输。

Wi-Fi 6E的竞争实现了比12T Pro明显更多的带宽，但对于高端智能手机来说，速度仍然是可以接受的。我们在与华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器连接时测得了超过800MB/s的峰值，但在接收时平均只有672MBit/s。在家庭网络中，小米智能手机以大部分稳定的传输速率得分。

12T Pro支持目前所有的移动标准（包括5G）的移动互联网接入。频率范围非常广泛，用户在德国的位置非常好。在总共24个支持的LTE频段中，没有任何东西能阻挡T型机的海外之旅。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1465 (1307^min - 1536^max) MBit/s +118%
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	934 (768^min - 949^max) MBit/s +39%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	904 (453^min - 912^max) MBit/s +35%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	881 (446^min - 922^max) MBit/s +31%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	826 (765^min - 881^max) MBit/s +23%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	672 (443^min - 729^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=209, last 2 years)	655 MBit/s -3%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1214 (516^min - 1524^max) MBit/s +47%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	945 (917^min - 968^max) MBit/s +15%
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	933 (865^min - 958^max) MBit/s +13%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	899 (432^min - 966^max) MBit/s +9%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	839 (531^min - 913^max) MBit/s +2%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	824 (757^min - 858^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=210, last 2 years)	692 MBit/s -16%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1657 (1379^min - 1781^max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1645 (1586^min - 1695^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (229 - 1894, n=61, last 2 years)	1536 MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1346 (696^min - 1430^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1743 (1585^min - 1798^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1565 (777^min - 1666^max) MBit/s
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1522 (1278^min - 1606^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (598 - 1840, n=61, last 2 years)	1364 MBit/s

Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, ARM Mali-G710 MP7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1645 (1586-1695)

Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, ARM Mali-G710 MP7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1742 (1585-1798)

Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø672 (443-729)

Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, ARM Mali-G710 MP7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø888 (453-912)

Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø824 (757-858)

Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, ARM Mali-G710 MP7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø945 (917-968)

对于定位，小米12T Pro使用了一些卫星系统，即GPS（L1+L5）、GLONASS（G1）、BeiDou（B1+B2）和Galileo（E1+E5）以及SBAS。为了能够评估真实世界的跟踪精度，我们带着这款高端智能手机进行了一次短途骑行，并与Garmin Venu 2并行记录路线，以便进行比较。

在大多数情况下，我们喜欢12T Pro的追踪能力。然而，在GPS记录的详细视图中，有时可以清楚地看到偏离所选路线的情况。12T Pro不时地偏离我们的实际路径。尽管有这些小的不准确之处，小米智能手机仍然很适合用于导航任务。

电话和语音质量 - 小米12T Pro与eSim的关系

小米智能手机支持双SIM卡的使用，基于两张nano-SIM卡或一张物理SIM卡和一张eSIM。支持VoLTE或WLAN通话等标准。

12T Pro的语音质量是不明显的。声音再现得很清楚，我们的通话伙伴也确认它们非常清晰。由于安装了麦克风，这款高端智能手机在视频会议（通过Skype测试）和双扬声器系统方面没有显示任何弱点。

照相机 - 小米智能手机，200MP

与11T Pro相比，，今年的顶级智能手机在冲孔处有一个相对高分辨率的2000万像素摄像头。采用索尼IMX596的前置摄像头的照片质量在良好的照明条件下的照片模式下非常稳固。12T Pro的清晰度和色彩还原度也令人印象深刻。然而，2000万像素的照片在人像模式下并不那么令人信服，因为曝光通常不理想，天空显得曝光过度。

与前代产品一样，小米也把重点放在12T Pro的主摄像头上，现在的主摄像头是200MP，而不是108MP。然而，在低分辨率的超广角摄像头方面没有太大变化，加上来自三星（S5K4H7）的传感器：在这里必须做出妥协。特别是锐度水平可以更好。

像这个价格范围内的通常情况一样，主摄像头具有光学图像稳定功能和f/1.69的大开放光圈，因此在黑暗中的照片通过像素分层技术得到了很好的照明--至少在理论上是这样。12T Pro在弱光下描绘的主体非常柔和，我们也看到了在亮度方面的改进潜力。

白天的照片在三星图像传感器（ISOCELL HP1）的作用下，对比度和细节都非常丰富。被摄体的显示效果相当酷，而且比竞争对手的照片后期锐化要少。然而，小米的高端智能手机在曝光方面仍有缺陷。此外，阴暗区域的照片有点颗粒感。

12T Pro的一个优点是快门释放时间短，这要归功于超连拍功能--这里每秒可拍摄30张照片。小米的T型机几乎没有快门滞后，对快门释放立即作出反应。在这个学科中，即使是三星Galaxy S22 Ultra 或Apple iPhone 14 Pro ，也无法跟上12T Pro的步伐。

动态图片可以以24帧/秒的速度记录，最高可达8K--使用UHD选项（60帧/秒）可以实现更高的刷新率。在运行中的1080p视频录制过程中，你也可以在主镜头和超广角镜头之间切换。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide angle Wide angle Low light Zoom 5x Ultra wide angle

click to load images

Xiaomi 12T Pro

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

Motorola Edge 30 Ultra

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Xiaomi 12T Pro

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

Motorola Edge 30 Ultra

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Xiaomi 12T Pro

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

Motorola Edge 30 Ultra

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Xiaomi 12T Pro

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

Motorola Edge 30 Ultra

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Xiaomi 12T Pro

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

Motorola Edge 30 Ultra

Canon EOS 90D

虽然T系列（还）不能利用与德国相机制造商徕卡的合作进行相机校准，但除了绿色调之外，颜色仍然被牢固地捕捉。我们在受控照明条件下测量的色彩保真度只显示了三个异常值（>15）。用ColorChecker Passport与实际参考颜色进行的分析表明，颜色是过饱和的，但我们也看到了灰度的改进潜力。

配件和保修 - 小米智能手机与电源适配器

12T Pro的交货范围包括一个模块化的120瓦电源，一条数据或充电线，一个保护壳盖，一个SIM卡针和一个快速启动指南，包括保修条款。

小米在德国为其智能手机提供24个月的保修，并提供 "独家 "客户支持，包括一个额外的服务热线。对有缺陷的屏幕也有有限的保修，其中包括自购买之日起6个月内的免费屏幕维修。此外，保修期外的人工费用将在头12个月内收取。

这些保修条款可能因地而异，所以购买前一定要向供应商咨询。

输入设备和操作 - 小米12T Pro，480赫兹

6.67英寸OLED DotDisplay上的输入被准确地实现，直到触摸屏的角落。一张保护膜在出厂前就已贴好，但它很容易出现油污条纹。12T Pro的面板采样率为480赫兹，对触摸的反应灵敏度高，每秒刷新480次，例如在游戏中，这确保了低输入延迟。小米还安装了一个振动马达，在日常使用中提供良好的触觉反馈。

光学指纹传感器集成在显示屏上，可以非常可靠和快速地解锁这款高端手机，但手指必须准确地放在标记的区域上。还有一个相当不安全的二维面部识别，它是基于通过前置摄像头的FaceUnlock功能，也可以使用。在白天，这通常比指纹传感器的工作速度快。

显示器 - 小米智能手机，120赫兹

6.67英寸20:9的AMOLED面板提供高达120赫兹的帧率，分辨率为2,712 x 1,220，相当不寻常。AdaptiveSync显示屏的帧率可以手动或自动降低到60赫兹，以节省电力。然而，T型机并没有像12 Pro那样拥有一个由系统控制的自适应帧率的LTPO面板。

在我们的亮度测量中，OLED屏幕在全白显示上达到约900cd/m²，这在这个价格范围内是一个很好的价值。APL18的测量，更能代表日常使用，在屏幕中心显示901 cd/m²。也是一个令人满意的数值，但是Galaxy S22+的亮度明显高于1500cd/m²左右。

由于安装的显示技术，小米使用PWM技术，包括屏幕闪烁，来控制屏幕亮度。然而，振幅曲线在整个亮度光谱中非常均匀，并在120赫兹下恒定--类似于出厂时的直流调光模式。

小米智能手机在我们的时间抖动测试中没有显示出异常。为此，我们在播放240FPS的慢动作视频时，用显微镜检查了OLED显示屏。


902 cd/m²	909 cd/m²	932 cd/m²
903 cd/m²	913 cd/m²	937 cd/m²
886 cd/m²	906 cd/m²	927 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 937 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 912.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.06 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 913 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
98.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23

	Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.67	Samsung Galaxy S22+ AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.60	OnePlus 10T Fluid AMOLED, 2412x1080, 6.70	Motorola Edge 30 Ultra pOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67	Xiaomi 12 Pro AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.73	Google Pixel 7 Pro OLED, 3120x1440, 6.70
Screen		-32%	-45%	-2%	-5%	15%
Brightness middle	913	1090 19%	861 -6%	1020 12%	959 5%	1022 12%
Brightness	913	1097 20%	856 -6%	1020 12%	977 7%	1025 12%
Brightness Distribution	95	98 3%	97 2%	96 1%	96 1%	99 4%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1	2.5 -150%	2.27 -127%	1 -0%	1.1 -10%	0.9 10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.4	3.8 -58%	4.17 -74%	2.8 -17%	3.1 -29%	2.1 12%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.8	2.3 -28%	2.9 -61%	2.1 -17%	1.9 -6%	1.1 39%
Gamma	2.23 ^99%	2.04 ^108%	2.303 ^96%	2.29 ^96%	2.22 ^99%	2.22 ^99%
CCT	6273 ^104%	6492 ^100%	6141 ^106%	6502 ^100%	6498 ^100%	6650 ^98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

120 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

在固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置下进行的一系列测量

除了强烈的对比之外，带有HDR10+的小米12T Pro提供了大的动态范围和高色彩空间覆盖。在sRGB中，几乎看不到与参照物的颜色差异。OLED面板的校准效果非常好，这一点在我们用光谱仪分析时得到了证实。CalMAN软件显示平均DeltaE偏差非常低，为1.0（颜色）和1.8（灰度）。然而，为了实现高精确度，必须在设置中选择较小的sRGB颜色空间。

在适应性方面，MIUI操作系统堪称典范。除了3个颜色配置文件，用户可以在高级设置中单独调整个别参数，如颜色空间或饱和度和伽玛值。12T Pro还提供了一个自适应色彩模式。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
0.95 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.453 ms rise
0.95 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.4945 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.501 ms rise
1.26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.7605 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

只要启动自动模式，这款小米高端智能手机就可以不受限制地在户外使用--在没有亮度传感器的情况下，我们只测得503 cd/m²。在阳光直射下，高亮度可以带来令人愉悦的户外体验。

OLED面板的可视角度稳定性非常好。显示内容显示生动，色彩相对真实，即使在平视角度也是如此。然而，显示屏也会变得有点冷，亮度也会减弱。

性能 - 采用高通SoC的小米手机

该骁龙8+1代12T Pro中的Snapdragon 8+ Gen.1是Android 领域的佼佼者。这款4纳米SoC基于三个集群，由一个主核（Cortex X2）、三个性能核（Cortex A710）和四个省电单元（Cortex A510）组成。该处理器还可以使用集成的 Adreno 730进行图形加速。

在CPU和系统基准测试中，小米智能手机提供了非常好的性能值。只有在PCMark和Crossmark的系统基准测试中，12T Pro才会 "减弱 "一点。否则，它在衡量人工智能性能的UL Procyon AI推理基准中也表现得非常强劲。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1356 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1328 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (897 - 1389, n=23)	1280 Points -6%
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	1277 Points -6%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1192 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	1133 Points -16%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	1048 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 2138, n=216, last 2 years)	914 Points -33%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	4432 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	4251 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (3782 - 4436, n=23)	4173 Points -6%
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	3987 Points -10%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	3738 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	3599 Points -19%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	3222 Points -27%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6681, n=216, last 2 years)	2997 Points -32%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1086424 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1073804 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (782013 - 1119358, n=21)	997518 Points -8%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	962824 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	850401 Points -22%
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	846323 Points -22%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	773857 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)	738503 Points -32%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	17340 Points +15%
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	15944 Points +6%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	15067 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	14998 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (11029 - 17727, n=22)	14796 Points -2%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	13131 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone (4761 - 21385, n=212, last 2 years)	11756 Points -22%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	11397 Points -24%

CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	1129 Points +27%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1103 Points +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (749 - 1178, n=21)	1033 Points +16%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	887 Points
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	886 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (200 - 1474, n=164, last 2 years)	835 Points -6%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	811 Points -9%
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	806 Points -9%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	8320 Points +30%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	8164 Points +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (5642 - 8753, n=21)	7507 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	7186 Points +12%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	6423 Points
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	6164 Points -4%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	6007 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=165, last 2 years)	5745 Points -11%
System
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	13412 Points +31%
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	12230 Points +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (8750 - 13563, n=21)	11842 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	11373 Points +11%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	10212 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	10006 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=165, last 2 years)	9678 Points -5%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	9294 Points -9%
Memory
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	8822 Points +43%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	8777 Points +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (3871 - 9114, n=21)	7549 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	6844 Points +11%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=165, last 2 years)	6250 Points +2%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	6152 Points
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	5456 Points -11%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	5125 Points -17%
Graphics
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	24037 Points +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (16742 - 26660, n=21)	21295 Points +27%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	19247 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	17475 Points +4%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	16742 Points
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	16375 Points -2%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	15216 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=165, last 2 years)	14101 Points -16%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	1960 Points +16%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1960 Points +16%
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	1833 Points +9%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	1739 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (1198 - 2006, n=21)	1713 Points +2%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1686 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1669 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=165, last 2 years)	1494 Points -11%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	68954 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	63613 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (3291 - 84787, n=19)	47040 Points -32%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	42662 Points -38%
Average of class Smartphone (207 - 84787, n=149, last 2 years)	21860 Points -68%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	14572 Points -79%
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	11648 Points -83%

AImark - Score v2.x
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	72572 Points +823%
Average of class Smartphone (1043 - 139804, n=50, last 2 years)	21146 Points +169%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	7865 Points
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	6955 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (1043 - 7865, n=11)	6385 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	6323 Points -20%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	6034 Points -23%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	5976 Points -24%

钍 Adreno 730也以非常高的性能值令人印象深刻。特别是在GFX的屏幕外，12T Pro表现得非常好。然而，由于分辨率略高，它无法与1080p的竞争者，如摩托罗拉的Edge 30 Ultra的屏幕上的速率相媲美。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2876 Points +4%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2768 Points +1%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2754 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2513 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1935 Points -30%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1807 Points -34%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2824 Points +1%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2796 Points 0%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2786 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2609 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2202 Points -21%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1847 Points -34%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11075 Points
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10989 Points -1%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10982 Points -1%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10384 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7890 Points -29%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6721 Points -39%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	144 fps +20%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps +1%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps -1%
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -50%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	459 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	456 fps -1%
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	435 fps -5%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	425 fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	320 fps -30%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	251 fps -45%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	144 fps +20%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps -1%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	117 fps -2%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	84 fps -30%
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -50%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	275 fps
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	251 fps -9%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	237 fps -14%
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	221 fps -20%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	214 fps -22%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	139 fps -49%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps +3%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	116 fps
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	114 fps -2%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	87 fps -25%
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -48%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56 fps -52%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	185 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	179 fps -3%
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	171 fps -8%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	169 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	130 fps -30%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	101 fps -45%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	89 fps +19%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	75 fps
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	73 fps -3%
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -20%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	37 fps -51%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	36 fps -52%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	108 fps +2%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	106 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	103 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	72 fps -32%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	71 fps -33%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	68 fps -36%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	68 fps +28%
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps +11%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	54 fps +2%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53 fps
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	28 fps -47%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	27 fps -49%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	52 fps +18%
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps 0%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	34 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	31 fps -30%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	31 fps -30%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	104 fps +30%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	80 fps
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	67 fps -16%
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -25%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps -45%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	38 fps -52%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	123 fps +6%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps +3%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	116 fps
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	92 fps -21%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	75 fps -35%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -48%

在浏览器的基准测试中，小米的高端智能手机排名在中下等。但12T Pro的用户不太可能在日常生活中注意到这种差异。滚动很流畅，加载时间也很好。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (76.2 - 178.5, n=21)	121.1 Points +23%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)	117.894 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Chrome 100.0.4896.127)	107.364 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=172, last 2 years)	105.8 Points +7%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G (Chrome 107)	98.755 Points
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)	98.153 Points -1%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)	84.1 Points -15%
OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104)	81.383 Points -18%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (69.1 - 167, n=16)	111.4 runs/min +54%
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)	107.1 runs/min +48%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Chrome 100.0.4896.127)	105 runs/min +45%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)	104 runs/min +44%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)	99.2 runs/min +37%
OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104)	93.4 runs/min +29%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)	73.5 runs/min +2%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G (Chrome 107)	72.28 runs/min

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (69 - 159, n=19)	111 Points +22%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)	101 Points +11%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=159, last 2 years)	99.9 Points +10%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G (Chrome 107)	91 Points
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)	90 Points -1%
OnePlus 10T	75 Points -18%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (106 - 224, n=14)	159.4 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Chrome 100.0.4896.127)	153 Points +42%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)	145 Points +34%
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)	133.1 Points +23%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)	119 Points +10%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G (Chrome 107)	108 Points
OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104)	106 Points -2%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)	98 Points -9%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Chrome 100.0.4896.127)	44398 Points +32%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)	44245 Points +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (17622 - 55611, n=22)	41373 Points +23%
OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104)	39982 Points +19%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)	37098 Points +10%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G (Chrome 107)	33644 Points
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=210, last 2 years)	33573 Points 0%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)	29750 Points -12%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104)	1627.3 ms * -30%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=172, last 2 years)	1599 ms * -27%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Chrome 100.0.4896.127)	1557.9 ms * -24%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)	1330 ms * -6%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G (Chrome 107)	1254.7 ms *
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)	1104 ms * +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (729 - 1707, n=20)	1047 ms * +17%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)	1011.5 ms * +19%

* ... smaller is better

小米智能手机的操作速度令人愉快，几乎没有延迟。应用程序的加载时间也很短。后者也是由于UFS存储的高速度所致。特别是12T Pro的写入率非常好。

	Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G	Samsung Galaxy S22+	OnePlus 10T	Motorola Edge 30 Ultra	Xiaomi 12 Pro	Google Pixel 7 Pro	Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-34%	-48%	-18%	-19%	-46%	-31%	-39%
Sequential Read 256KB	1870.78	1629.99 -13%	1568.37 -16%	1717.77 -8%	1620 -13%	1346.78 -28%	1760 ?(1004 - 2037, n=87) -6%	1505 ?(226 - 4512, n=215, last 2 years) -20%
Sequential Write 256KB	1726.23	1001.67 -42%	847.69 -51%	1363.58 -21%	1465 -15%	874.73 -49%	1134 ?(452 - 1873, n=87) -34%	1112 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=215, last 2 years) -36%
Random Read 4KB	543.38	306.7 -44%	173.45 -68%	349.08 -36%	324.9 -40%	219.01 -60%	281 ?(173.5 - 543, n=87) -48%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=215, last 2 years) -55%
Random Write 4KB	483.87	297.67 -38%	211.24 -56%	446.25 -8%	448.9 -7%	253.18 -48%	311 ?(197.5 - 499, n=88) -36%	271 ?(13 - 709, n=215, last 2 years) -44%

游戏--小米12T Pro无法管理120帧的画面

为了评估GPU在游戏和基准测试中的能力，我们用我们的合作伙伴GameBench 的软件仔细观察了Play Store的两款Android 。

这两款Android 游戏都运行顺畅，没有大的帧数下降--这是对Snapdragon.8+ Gen 1 。然而，在PUBG Mobile上，无论我们选择何种图形设置，这家中国制造商都施加了60帧的限制--UHD模式除外。在这里，12T Pro的运行速度只有40 fps。

在理论上支持高达144帧的Armajet模式下，最多可达到103帧。然而，12T Pro的平均运行速度只有63 fps。即使是价格低廉的中端SoC，比如说骁龙695，在2D多人射击游戏中平均达到80帧以上。这似乎与废热无关，因为机箱在游戏过程中最多只会发热，从不发热。

Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G; Armajet: Ø62.6 (47-98)

Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.2 (52-61)

Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø59 (49-61)

Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.2 (51-61)

Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.8 (36-41)

排放 - 小米智能手机几乎不发热

温度

液体冷却系统由蒸发冷却室和多层石墨板组成，在日常使用中能很好地控制机箱的表面温度。对于配备Snapdragon 8+ Gen1的智能手机来说，12T Pro在负载下保持相对低温。

这款高端小米智能手机能够完成GFXBench的电池测试，在苛刻的曼哈顿测试（OpenGL ES 3.1）中，但没有提供评估结果。3DMark的Wild Life Stress测试显示，高通SoC的部分性能有所下降，但对于搭载骁龙8+ Gen1的智能手机来说，其一致性仍然非常惊人。小米在这方面做得非常好，特别是考虑到了摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra.

Max. Load

Idle


30.1 °C	30.2 °C	31.9 °C
30.4 °C	30.4 °C	31.2 °C
30.2 °C	30 °C	30.8 °C

Maximum: 31.9 °C
Average: 30.6 °C


29.3 °C	28.8 °C	29.4 °C
29 °C	29.1 °C	29.9 °C
29 °C	29.1 °C	29.4 °C

Maximum: 29.9 °C
Average: 29.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 31.1 °C | Room Temperature 21.1 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.9 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	92.7 % +5%
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	88.5 %
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	67.9 % -23%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59.6 % -33%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	58.2 % -34%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	47.2 % -47%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	94 %
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	75.6 % -20%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	63.1 % -33%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60.9 % -35%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	% -100%
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	% -100%

Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø16.1 (15.7-16.7)

Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø9.11 (8.06-13.3)

Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø13 (10.6-16.7)

Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø9.93 (8.31-11)

Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø59.7 (57.2-64.7)

Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø31.4 (27.4-47.1)

OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø61.8 (59-63.6)

Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 1.1.0.2: Ø44.1 (36.4-61.1)

Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø37.8 (27.4-58)

Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø32.8 (26.2-38.6)

Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø49.5 (34.8-61.7)

Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø36.5 (30.7-39.8)

发言人

正如在 12 Pro，小米智能手机的两个立体声扬声器已经被哈曼卡顿优化。这两个扬声器可提供超过90分贝的最大音量和非常体面的声音。然而，在整体音质方面，低中音和高音都有些不足。

除了广泛的蓝牙编解码器，包括SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive、aptX TWS+、LDAC和LHDC，耳机也可以通过USB-C端口连接。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Google Pixel 7 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 小米智能手机充电迅速

消耗功率

小米12T Pro的电池容量为5000毫安时，可以用内部的HyperCharge技术充电，最大功率为120瓦。在我们的测试中，充满电大约需要20分钟。能量容量由9个热传感器监测，在充电过程中控制连接器和电池。小米保证800个充电周期，这明显少于其他制造商。例如，OnePlus声称其10T机型的电池寿命为1600次，其充电功率也高达150瓦。与12T Pro相比，无线充电已被省略，以降低成本。小米12 Pro.

小米智能手机的耗电量并不完全令人信服。闲置模式下的平均功耗为1.7瓦，相当高。然而，在负载下，该骁龙8+第一代的功耗与高通竞争对手相似。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.08 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	1.05 / 1.65 / 1.72 Watt
Load	3.12 / 6.02 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S22+ 4500 mAh	OnePlus 10T 4800 mAh	Motorola Edge 30 Ultra 4610 mAh	Xiaomi 12 Pro 4600 mAh	Google Pixel 7 Pro 5000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-22%	13%	9%	-12%	6%	-30%	-17%
Idle Minimum *	1.05	0.71 32%	0.8 24%	0.74 30%	0.94 10%	0.78 26%	1.015 ?(0.56 - 2.57, n=19) 3%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) 15%
Idle Average *	1.65	1.1 33%	1.2 27%	1.84 -12%	1.24 25%	1.61 2%	1.869 ?(0.71 - 8.65, n=19) -13%	1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) 12%
Idle Maximum *	1.72	1.19 31%	1.3 24%	1.86 -8%	1.34 22%	1.63 5%	2.02 ?(0.79 - 8.71, n=19) -17%	1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) 5%
Load Average *	3.12	7.74 -148%	3.5 -12%	2.75 12%	5.7 -83%	3.29 -5%	5.69 ?(2.75 - 15, n=19) -82%	5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) -78%
Load Maximum *	6.02	9.64 -60%	5.9 2%	4.54 25%	8.12 -35%	6.01 -0%	8.55 ?(4.54 - 15, n=19) -42%	8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) -38%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.5 (1.112-12.1)

Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.26 (0.911-12.7)

Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.062 (0.976-1.253)

Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.09 (1.021-1.371)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.13 (6.64-8.12)

Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.2 (10-12.2)

Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.062 (0.976-1.253)

Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.09 (1.021-1.371)

电池寿命

在我们的两项实际电池测试中，小米12T Pro在固定的120赫兹刷新率下提供了良好的运行时间，这是在调整后的150cd/m²的显示亮度下进行的。

在WLAN测试中，这款高端智能手机能够运行超过18个小时，在禁用WLAN模块的情况下，甚至在无休止的视频播放中还能运行3.5个小时。与小米12 Pro相比，这导致运行时间增加了30%以上。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		29h 14min
WiFi Websurfing		18h 05min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		21h 26min
Load (maximum brightness)		5h 21min

	Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S22+ 4500 mAh	OnePlus 10T 4800 mAh	Motorola Edge 30 Ultra 4610 mAh	Xiaomi 12 Pro 4600 mAh	Google Pixel 7 Pro 5000 mAh
Battery Runtime		3%	3%	-0%	-12%	-26%
Reader / Idle	1754	2575 47%	1795 2%	2206 26%	2036 16%	1210 -31%
H.264	1286	1021 -21%	1646 28%	1188 -8%	788 -39%	1213 -6%
WiFi v1.3	1085	788 -27%	856 -21%	872 -20%	766 -29%	676 -38%
Load	321	364 13%	332 3%	323 1%	337 5%	226 -30%

Pros

+ 明亮的120赫兹OLED

+ 强大的SoC

+ 非常好的冷却效果

+ 良好的扬声器

+ 良好的电池寿命

+ 快速充电和匹配的电源

Cons

- Android 12只

- 平庸的超广角摄像头

- 没有IP等级

- 没有WiFi 6E

- 没有无线充电

- 只有USB 2.0

对小米12T Pro 5G的评价

小米12T Pro是一款强大的高端智能手机，具有有趣的强弱特征。一方面，与小米12 Pro相比，T型机具有合理的改进。小米12 Pro。例如，三星新的200MP传感器，高效的骁龙8+第一代和eSIM支持。另一方面，建议零售价低于制造商的旗舰系列，冷却效果更好，这导致性能值更加稳定。然而，尽管小米12T Pro拥有强大的SoC，但寻求游戏的用户不会对它感到满意--我们建议看一下华硕ROG手机6.

与小米12 Pro相比小米12 Pro,T型机不得不在缺乏IP认证和无线充电方面做出让步。小米12T Pro在设计和感觉方面也没有太多的优势，它的显示屏边缘较厚，塑料框架和大猩猩玻璃5。那些重视这些方面的人将会发现一个有趣的选择，那就是摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra。它还配备了20万像素的摄像头。

小米12T Pro的SoC升级和改进的冷却系统使其运行时间非常好。

小米上层智能手机的亮点是20万像素的摄像头，在日光下的美丽显示质量给人留下深刻印象。然而，我们希望在这个价格范围内有稍好的低光性能，因为在没有长焦镜头和坚实的超广角镜头的情况下，已经不得不做出妥协了。谷歌提供了更好的相机包，包括 Pixel 7 Pro中提供了更好的相机包，属于高等级范围。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

由于小米12T Pro 5G在10月6日才推出，可能无法保证在您的所在地有货。美国亚马逊列出的变体价格为729,00美元。在大西洋的另一边，它在英国似乎暂时不可用，而法国亚马逊以695,50欧元的价格提供该智能手机。

价格截止到2022年11月24日，可能会有变化。

Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G - 2022-11-23 11/23/2022 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

86%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

94%

Connectivity

54 / 70 → 77%

Weight

88%

Battery

92%

Display

93%

Games Performance

73 / 64 → 100%

Application Performance

88 / 86 → 100%

Temperature

93%

Noise

100%

Audio

74 / 90 → 82%

Camera

70%

Average

83%

88%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Jacob Fisher - Translator - 888 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 387730 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 小米12T Pro 5G评论。拥有200MP和骁龙8+ Gen1的智能手机，价格诱人

Marcus Herbrich, 2022-11-27 (Update: 2022-11-27)

小米12T Pro 5G评论。拥有200MP和骁龙8+ Gen1的智能手机，价格诱人

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 - 小米智能手机没有IP等级

尺寸比较

设备 - 小米12T专业版，带红外辐射器

软件 - 小米智能手机有4年的更新时间

通信与GNSS - 小米智能手机，带Wi-Fi 6

电话和语音质量 - 小米12T Pro与eSim的关系

照相机 - 小米智能手机，200MP

配件和保修 - 小米智能手机与电源适配器

输入设备和操作 - 小米12T Pro，480赫兹

显示器 - 小米智能手机，120赫兹

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 采用高通SoC的小米手机

游戏--小米12T Pro无法管理120帧的画面

排放 - 小米智能手机几乎不发热

温度

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

发言人

Xiaomi 12T Pro 5G audio analysis

Google Pixel 7 Pro audio analysis

电池寿命 - 小米智能手机充电迅速

消耗功率

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

对小米12T Pro 5G的评价

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare