Notebookcheck Logo

Vivo X80 Pro智能手机评测。拥有巨大指纹传感器的Primus相机

不仅适用于粗大的手指。 在X80 Pro的相机方面,vivo正在与蔡司紧密合作。除了众所周知的万向节防抖之外,vivo旨在确保在一款类似旗舰的智能手机中实现自然的色彩还原,这款手机在视觉上和技术上都很吸引人,但并不完全是廉价的。
5G Smartphone Touchscreen Android

在VIVO推出了瘦身版的X60 Pro与X61在2020年上市,并在去年完全取消了X70系列在欧洲的销售,今年完整的旗舰机体验将来到我们身边。作为步步高集团的一部分,其中还包括Oppo、realme和OnePlus,Vivo正试图创造一个特别强大的相机包,并在这方面与德国公司蔡司合作了很长时间。这不仅包括镜头,还包括软件算法(从X80 Pro开始)。

vivo将一切都捆绑在一个视觉上和技术上都很吸引人的高端智能手机中,在显示屏下隐藏了一个大得惊人的指纹传感器,这一点我们已经从 vivo X Note.我们的评论是,这是否足以证明约1,300美元的高价是合理的。

Vivo X80 Pro (X Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5
Display
6.78 inch 20:9, 3200 x 1440 pixel 518 PPI, Capacitive, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG, IR-Blaster
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.1 x 164.57 x 75.3
Battery
4700 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.6, 1/1.3") + 8 MPix (5x optical zoom, f/3.4, 1/4.4", 1.0 µm) + 12 MPix (2x optical zoom, f/1.9, 50 mm, 1/2.93", 1.22 µm) + 48 MPix (f/2.2, 1/2.0"); Camer2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.5, 24 mm, 1/2.8", 0.8 µm)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, 80W-Charger, Case, SIM-Tool, USB-Cabel (Type-A to Type-C), Headset, Funtouch OS 12, 24 Months Warranty, DRM Widevine L1, Body-SAR: 1.09 W/kg, Head-SAR: 0.98 W/kg; GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1, E5a), BeiDou (B1, B1C, B2a), QZSS, fanless, waterproof
Weight
215 g
Price
1299 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88.5 %
09/2022
Vivo X80 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
215 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.78"3200x1440
89.4 %
03/2022
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920
228 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"3088x1440
89.2 %
04/2022
Oppo Find X5 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
221 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3216x1440
87.5 %
08/2022
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
204 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"2480x1116
87.6 %
02/2022
Xiaomi 12 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
204 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.73"3200x1440

在全球范围内,vivo X80 Pro有三种颜色。宇宙黑蓝色 橙色。不过,这些颜色的范围可能因地而异。例如,只有宇宙黑 在德国有售,因此我们评测样品的颜色也是如此。我们的黑色智能手机在正面和背面都配备了一种未指定的玻璃。它的背面是磨砂的,感觉略微粗糙,这使得它不仅有触觉上的愉悦,而且还能防指纹。

尽管摄像头非常突出,突出部分达2.1毫米,但其宽度确保了X80 Pro稳稳地坐在桌子上。我们特别喜欢它的制造质量。间隙大多是均匀的;只有在圆角处,即背部与铝制框架相接的地方,它们不是很均匀。另一方面,扭转刚度非常好,这就是为什么当我们试图弯曲它时,vivo智能手机几乎没有发出任何声音。

X80 Pro通过了IP68认证,即防尘和防水。SIM卡槽有一个铝制盖子,并与框架无缝连接,而卡座是由塑料制成的。

尺寸比较

164.57 mm 75.3 mm 9.1 mm 215 g163.6 mm 74.6 mm 8.66 mm 204 g163.3 mm 77.9 mm 8.9 mm 228 g163.7 mm 73.9 mm 8.5 mm 221 g163.28 mm 73.56 mm 8.41 mm 204 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备--不支持microSD的vivo X80 Pro

vivo X80 Pro拥有一个USB 3.2端口(Gen. 1),不仅可以实现快速的数据传输,还可以将有线图像输出到HDMI或DisplayPort接口,前提是使用一个可选的适配器。

其余设备相当全面,包括NFC、蓝牙5.2、用于控制家庭娱乐设备的红外辐射器、气候控制、摄像头等等。由于内存较大,缺乏通过microSD卡进行内存扩展的选项当然是可以接受的,但在这个价格范围内可以安装一个UWB芯片。

顶部:红外辐射器,麦克风
顶部:红外辐射器,麦克风
左侧
左侧
右边:音量摇杆,电源按钮
右边:音量摇杆,电源按钮
底部。扬声器、USB、麦克风、SIM卡
底部。扬声器、USB、麦克风、SIM卡

软件 - 采用Funtouch操作系统的vivo智能手机

vivo X80 Pro配备了谷歌Android 12和内部的Funtouch操作系统。在亚洲,vivo现在使用Origin OS,它在X Note,除此之外,还基于Android 。但到目前为止,还没有计划将其推广到世界其他地区。

vivo智能手机应该在三年内收到更新,但制造商没有给出任何关于安全补丁的更新间隔的具体信息。在审查时,最后一个补丁是2022年7月1日的,因此是最新的。

vivo预装了一些第三方应用程序,但它们可以被轻易卸载。

通信和GNSS - Vivo X80 Pro没有6GHz WiFi。

vivo X80 Pro拥有现代通信设备。在最好的情况下,它可以用5G Sub6接入数据网络,并享有广泛的频段支持。

Wi-Fi 6可用于本地Wi-Fi网络。不幸的是,vivo不支持6GHz频段。与我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器串联,由于支持VHT160,X80 Pro实现了非常高的传输速率,但这些在发送方向上并不总是稳定。话说回来,这在日常使用中应该是不明显的。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1465 (1307min - 1536max) MBit/s +6%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1383 (1126min - 1462max) MBit/s
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
900 (844min - 951max) MBit/s -35%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
820 (799min - 837max) MBit/s -41%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
716 (539min - 791max) MBit/s -48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=210, last 2 years)
654 MBit/s -53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1328 (378min - 1471max) MBit/s
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1214 (516min - 1524max) MBit/s -9%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
890 (433min - 934max) MBit/s -33%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
831 (428min - 859max) MBit/s -37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=211, last 2 years)
690 MBit/s -48%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
521 (311min - 704max) MBit/s -61%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1704 (852min - 1767max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (229 - 1894, n=61, last 2 years)
1536 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1702 (1642min - 1735max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (598 - 1840, n=61, last 2 years)
1364 MBit/s
0801602403204004805606407208008809601040112012001280136014401520Tooltip
Vivo X80 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1380 (1126-1462)
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1463 (1307-1536)
Vivo X80 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1306 (378-1471)
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1197 (516-1524)
GPS:户外
在户外
GPS: 在室内
在室内
GPSTest: 连接的GNSS
全球导航卫星系统

不幸的是,vivo X80 Pro拒绝与我们的GNSS跟踪应用程序一起工作,这就是为什么我们无法在这里呈现与Gamin Venu 2的通常比较。该应用程序打开并开始记录,但在骑行过程中没有警告就关闭了。后来的系统和应用程序更新也没有带来任何改善。

定位在户外非常快和准确,即使在室内,偏差也很小,这当然是由于广泛的网络支持。

电话和语音质量

vivo X80 Pro在听和说两个方向都有良好的通信质量。噪声抑制是明显的。在扬声器模式下,vivo智能手机的用户会有一点回声,但其他方面都能很好地理解。

X80 Pro支持Wi-Fi电话以及VoLTE。两个物理nano-SIM卡插槽可用于SIM卡,但不支持eSIM。为此,SIP账户管理被直接整合到电话应用中。

相机--vivo X80 Pro中强大的四摄像头

与vivo X80 Pro的自拍
与vivo X80 Pro的自拍

显示屏上的前置摄像头可以实现体面的自拍,也可以进行众多设置。虽然在正常的照片模式下只有几个过滤器可用,但人像选项可以更广泛地定制。例如,可以调整虚化的光圈,并选择不同的过滤器(有或没有AR),甚至是化妆效果。同样,姿势模板也可以淡化,以更容易地重新创建姿势。然而,视频只能在30 FPS下以1080p录制,但仍然可以利用几个美容过滤器。

亮点是背面的相机设置。主传感器(长宽比:1:1、4:3、16:9和全屏)再次利用了前代产品的万向节稳定功能,现在还提供了对水平观察轴的控制,这确保即使智能手机旋转360°,记录的图像也不会旋转。此外,镜头有一个蔡司T涂层,这应该是为了减少耀斑和鬼影。

通过所有镜头,白天的照片令人印象深刻,并提供相应的良好图像质量。那些喜欢自然色彩的人可以激活蔡司模式,但即使没有这个模式,色彩也不会显示任何过度饱和或其他畸变。此外,额外的拍摄模式仍然集成在相机应用程序中。

超广角不仅提供了大量的分辨率,而且还对镜头曲率进行了清晰的修正。没有畸变被记录下来。只有深入的细节可以更清晰一些。超广角也可以作为微距镜头使用,而且还有两个光学变焦。2倍放大镜主要作为人像镜头使用,但也可用于普通照片。五倍潜望镜相当紧凑,但相比之下也没有表现出特别好的成像性能。最高可实现60倍的数字放大。

vivo X80 Pro可以录制所有常见分辨率的视频,最高可达8k,30FPS,包括HDR10+。超高清和全高清可以达到60FPS。那些想使用Ultra或360°防抖的人必须将自己限制在1080p(60 FPS)。长宽比固定为16:9,而电影选项使用21:9,但也可以用超高清拍摄,最多30FPS。蔡司电影模式甚至被限制为每秒24帧的全高清。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide angle5x zoomLow light shot
click to load images

我们在日常使用中的积极印象在受控的照明条件下得到进一步证实。Vivo X80 Pro整齐地再现了我们的测试图,而没有过分追求锐度,即使在周边地区也几乎没有任何锐度损失。

使用蔡司模式时,ColorChecker显示得非常自然。但即使没有这个,Vivo智能手机也没有显示任何严重的异常值(DeltaE:3.23 - 8.99,平均:6.03)。

ColorChecker
5.5 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
2 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
3 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
4 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
5 ∆E
ColorChecker Vivo X80 Pro: 4.3 ∆E min: 1.77 - max: 7.89 ∆E
ColorChecker
23.3 ∆E
37.1 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
29.9 ∆E
35.2 ∆E
46.4 ∆E
34 ∆E
26.3 ∆E
25.3 ∆E
25.5 ∆E
48 ∆E
49.2 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
33.7 ∆E
21.3 ∆E
42.6 ∆E
32.8 ∆E
36.2 ∆E
32.1 ∆E
38.5 ∆E
40.9 ∆E
33.1 ∆E
22.9 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Vivo X80 Pro: 32.53 ∆E min: 13.42 - max: 49.22 ∆E

配件和保修 - 大范围的交付

vivo X80 Pro配备了一个模块化的80瓦电源适配器、一条配套的USB线、SIM卡工具、一个黑色保护罩和一个耳机(USB-C)。一个带有Qi-Pad的充电站被作为选项提供。

vivo在德国提供24个月的保证。这在其他国家可能有所不同,所以在购买前一定要向你的供应商查询。

输入设备和操作 - X80 Pro中巨大的超声波FPS

Vivo X80 Pro使用电容式触摸屏,可同时检测多达10次的触摸,并以300赫兹的采样率工作。输入被可靠地识别并迅速实施。工厂贴的保护膜具有良好的滑行性能,但没有覆盖整个正面玻璃表面。

一个真正的亮点是大型3D超声波指纹传感器,据vivo称,它比传统机型大11.1倍。我们立即注意到了这种差异,因为不再需要为了检测而多次抬起手指,而是只需短暂的触摸即可。宽大的表面使解锁过程更加舒适。识别不仅非常快,而且也很精确。此外,还可以设置一个应用锁,然后甚至可以用两个手指来固定。此外,预选的应用程序可以直接从锁屏上打开。此外,也可以通过前置摄像头设置一个不太安全的面部识别形式的解锁方法。

显示屏 - Vivo X80 Pro,明亮的LTPO-AMOLED和120 Hz

子像素网格
子像素网格

vivo X80 Pro的6.78英寸AMOLED屏幕采用QHD-Plus分辨率,因此具有非常高的像素密度水平。如果需要的话,这可以减少到全高清+。刷新率可以选择设置为60或120赫兹,但也可以完全由系统管理并适应相应的内容。在测试中,我们发现名义上固定的刷新率也是如此,它可以逐渐降低到低至10赫兹。

在激活环境光传感器的情况下,纯白色显示器的亮度平均为947cd/m²。随着光区和暗区的均匀分布(APL18),这甚至增加到1,255 cd/m²,这应该允许一个优秀的HDR体验。vivo智能手机支持的HDR标准是HLG、HDR10和HDR10+。那些喜欢手动调节亮度的人有467 cd/m²可供他们使用。

OLED闪烁在最低显示亮度时最为明显,在179.6和361.7赫兹之间闪烁。由于直流调光是不可能的,敏感的用户可能会觉得这很烦人。我们没有登记任何使用时间性抖动的情况。

941
cd/m²
940
cd/m²
961
cd/m²
938
cd/m²
938
cd/m²
962
cd/m²
941
cd/m²
936
cd/m²
962
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 962 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 946.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.56 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 938 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
94.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2
Vivo X80 Pro
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.78
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Dynamic AMOLED, 3088x1440, 6.80
Oppo Find X5 Pro
AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.70
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
AMOLED, 2480x1116, 6.80
Xiaomi 12 Pro
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.73
Screen
-1%
-8%
-65%
-21%
Brightness middle
938
1077
15%
746
-20%
682
-27%
959
2%
Brightness
947
1093
15%
744
-21%
683
-28%
977
3%
Brightness Distribution
97
97
0%
97
0%
94
-3%
96
-1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.9
1.2
-33%
0.9
-0%
1.8
-100%
1.1
-22%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.9
2
-5%
1.6
16%
4.7
-147%
3.1
-63%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.3
1.3
-0%
1.6
-23%
2.4
-85%
1.9
-46%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.37 93%
2.23 99%
2.16 102%
2.22 99%
CCT
6518 100%
6526 100%
6499 100%
6634 98%
6498 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 361.7 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 361.7 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 361.7 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最小显示亮度
闵行区。
25%的显示亮度
25%
50%的显示亮度
50%
75%的显示亮度
75%
最大手动显示亮度
100%

在固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置下进行的一系列测量

Vivo X80 Pro的AMOLED显示屏的色彩表现可以非常准确。然而,要做到这一点,必须选择专业色彩模式,并将色温保持在标准状态。然后,该面板只能在较小的sRGB色彩空间中工作,但色彩保真度非常好。

如果你使用工厂设置,你会得到一个更冷和更饱和的显示,然而,它使用更大的DCI-P3色彩空间。

灰度(颜色模式。专业,色温。标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(颜色模式。专业,色温。标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(颜色模式。专业,色温。标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(颜色模式。专业,色温。标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(色彩模式。专业,色温。标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(色彩模式。专业,色温。标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(颜色模式。专业,色温。标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(颜色模式。专业,色温。标准,目标色彩空间:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.74 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.9532 ms rise
↘ 0.7908 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.037 ms rise
↘ 1.485 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Vivo X80 Pro在户外的表现非常好,在任何程度的光线下都非常容易阅读,甚至在非常晴朗的日子里也是如此。环境光传感器的工作速度非常快,可以迅速调整亮度。

在阴凉处
在阴凉处
在阳光下
在阳光下

正如预期的那样,vivo智能手机的可视角度稳定性非常好。在任何视角下都没有颜色反转,我们也没有发现许多OLED典型的虹彩现象。最多,显示屏会有点冷,亮度会减弱。

Vivo X80 Pro的视角稳定性
Vivo X80 Pro的视角稳定性

性能 - X80 Pro中的Snapdragon 8 Gen 1

vivo X80 Pro搭载的是骁龙8代1,它有12GB的LPDDR5工作内存。如果有必要,这可以增加到4GB,并为此使用闪存。

这款vivo智能手机在CPU和系统基准测试中给出了体面的性能值。它只是在PCMark中稍稍落后于竞争对手。相反,人工智能测试的结果甚至更有说服力。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1257 Points +2%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1234 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1181 - 1298, n=21)
1231 Points 0%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1217 Points -1%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1192 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1154 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=219, last 2 years)
913 Points -26%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3738 Points +1%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3685 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
3560 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (3269 - 3839, n=21)
3548 Points -4%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3488 Points -5%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
3289 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=219, last 2 years)
2996 Points -19%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
962824 Points +2%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
944782 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (692924 - 1041980, n=18)
928953 Points -2%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
922942 Points -2%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
856953 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)
738503 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
704479 Points -25%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (10140 - 17025, n=21)
13216 Points +30%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13131 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
12579 Points +24%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12144 Points +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=214, last 2 years)
11787 Points +16%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
10745 Points +6%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10140 Points
CrossMark - Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (749 - 1169, n=14)
993 Points +13%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
956 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
942 Points +7%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
879 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=165, last 2 years)
837 Points -5%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
811 Points -8%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
749 Points -15%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
7665 Points +8%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7085 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (6007 - 7665, n=15)
6951 Points -2%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6799 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6319 Points -11%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6007 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)
5759 Points -19%
System
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
10464 Points +7%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10340 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (9273 - 11338, n=15)
10312 Points +6%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10006 Points +2%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
9873 Points +1%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
9765 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)
9672 Points -1%
Memory
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
8906 Points +19%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7492 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (5125 - 8906, n=15)
6787 Points -9%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6523 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)
6267 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6212 Points -17%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
5125 Points -32%
Graphics
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
21944 Points +8%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
21650 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (15216 - 22308, n=15)
20338 Points 0%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
20288 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
17104 Points -16%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
15216 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)
14220 Points -30%
Web
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1813 Points +7%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1698 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1669 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1291 - 1888, n=15)
1659 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)
1495 Points -12%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1444 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1434 Points -16%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
74725 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (61568 - 81722, n=8)
72917 Points -2%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
68880 Points -8%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
63613 Points -15%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
61568 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=150, last 2 years)
21814 Points -71%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
10841 Points -85%
AImark - Score v2.x
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
72572 Points +1042%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1043 - 139804, n=50, last 2 years)
21146 Points +233%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1046 - 96317, n=14)
17097 Points +169%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
6442 Points +1%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6355 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6217 Points -2%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
5982 Points -6%

图形处理是由阿德雷诺730。还集成了Vivo V1 Plus芯片,与Oppo Find X Pro中的MariSilicon X不同。 OPPO的Find X5 Pro它不仅支持DSP,而且还应该改善图形处理。然而,这在基准测试中是不明显的。结果是好的,但没有明显优于其他具有相同GPU的智能手机。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2523 Points +3%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2513 Points +2%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2456 Points
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2188 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1916 Points -22%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2609 Points +2%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2575 Points 0%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2567 Points
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2528 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2044 Points -20%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10384 Points +2%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10175 Points 0%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10151 Points
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9593 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7288 Points -28%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9927 Points
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9826 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7236 Points
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4156 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4150 Points 0%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4033 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3957 Points -5%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3902 Points -6%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18090 Points +2%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
17770 Points
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14143 Points -20%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13950 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12972 Points -27%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10284 Points
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10005 Points -3%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9149 Points -11%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9083 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8612 Points -16%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12123 Points +1%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11974 Points
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11000 Points -8%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10958 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10415 Points -13%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
25285 Points +3%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
24487 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20842 Points -15%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20795 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18689 Points -24%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4296 Points 0%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4294 Points
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4153 Points -3%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4120 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4085 Points -5%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
121 fps +102%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
118 fps +97%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
114 fps +90%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
426 fps +60%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
425 fps +59%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
380 fps +42%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
302 fps +13%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
267 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
117 fps +95%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
108 fps +80%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
251 fps +71%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
193 fps +31%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
187 fps +27%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
181 fps +23%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
147 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
111 fps +85%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
87 fps +45%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps +18%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps -7%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
169 fps +71%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
127 fps +28%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps +16%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
111 fps +12%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps +31%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps -20%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps -20%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps -27%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps +42%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
70 fps +40%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps +36%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps +26%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
50 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps 0%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps -31%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps -40%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
27 fps -48%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps +18%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps 0%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps -12%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 fps +27%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps -12%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps -27%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps -30%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
94 fps +8%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
92 fps +6%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
87 fps
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
80 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps -22%

vivo X80 Pro在浏览器基准测试中的表现只能算是一般,有时远远达不到预期的速率。但这在日常使用中并不明显,网页浏览也非常流畅。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)
130.189 Points +79%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (72.8 - 134.6, n=16)
107.9 Points +48%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)
106.1 Points +46%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
103 Points +42%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
96.8 Points +33%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
84.1 Points +16%
Vivo X80 Pro
72.786 Points
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)
118.5 runs/min +35%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
108 runs/min +23%
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)
107.1 runs/min +22%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
104 runs/min +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (64.4 - 129.3, n=16)
104 runs/min +18%
Vivo X80 Pro (Chrome 103)
87.9 runs/min
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
73.5 runs/min -16%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (79 - 193, n=15)
142.9 Points +81%
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)
133.1 Points +68%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
133 Points +68%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
124 Points +57%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
119 Points +51%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)
99 Points +25%
Vivo X80 Pro (Chrome 103)
79 Points
Octane V2 - Total Score
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)
47182 Points +6%
Vivo X80 Pro (Chrome 103)
44631 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (27730 - 50626, n=17)
42391 Points -5%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
38407 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
34055 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=213, last 2 years)
33503 Points -25%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
29750 Points -33%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)
1595 ms * -29%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
1330 ms * -7%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
1259 ms * -2%
Vivo X80 Pro (Chrome 103)
1240.1 ms *
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
1125 ms * +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (814 - 1440, n=16)
1010 ms * +19%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)
813.5 ms * +34%

* ... smaller is better

vivo智能手机的256GB UFS 3.1存储空间速度很快,在各方面都显示出优秀的性能。

Vivo X80 ProSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5GOppo Find X5 ProZTE Axon 40 UltraXiaomi 12 ProAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-15%
-37%
-16%
4%
-13%
-22%
Sequential Read 256KB
1856.39
1653
-11%
1410
-24%
1638.15
-12%
1620
-13%
Sequential Write 256KB
1424.91
1074
-25%
894
-37%
1065.13
-25%
1465
3%
1134 ?(452 - 1873, n=87)
-20%
Random Read 4KB
303.72
322.3
6%
183.7
-40%
313.35
3%
324.9
7%
Random Write 4KB
382.17
273.1
-29%
210.4
-45%
273.19
-29%
448.9
17%

游戏--vivo智能手机是一个真正的游戏者

ǞǞǞ Adreno 730快速的120赫兹显示屏确保了vivo X80 Pro是注定用于游戏的,因为它有足够的动力,没有任何东西可以阻碍高帧率游戏的进行,至少在技术上是这样。在我们用GameBench记录的测试游戏中,这款vivo智能手机没有显示出任何缺点。我们用GameBench记录了这些游戏,并提供了吸引人和稳定的帧率,即使是在最高的细节设置下。然而,《死亡扳机2》停在60FPS,尽管该游戏支持高达120FPS,而且系统在名义上足够强大。

一个实用的附加功能是超级游戏模式,它不像ROG手机6的X模式那样全面。 ROG Phone 6但仍然提供了一些有用的设置,如禁用通知,以便在游戏中不被打扰。

PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
死亡扳机2与超级游戏模式控制台
死亡扳机2
超级游戏模式设置
USM
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Vivo X80 Pro; Dead Trigger 2; 1.8.18: Ø60 (58-61)
Vivo X80 Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.1.0: Ø58.9 (50-61)
Vivo X80 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 2.1.0: Ø39.8 (36-41)

排放 - 具有良好扬声器的智能手机

温度

Vivo X80 Pro的表面温度始终保持在令人愉快的低水平,在持续负载下甚至不会变得温热。

然而,在智能手机内部则是另一回事。在3DMark压力测试中,X80 Pro的性能随着时间的推移不断下降,但它仍然比Find X5 Pro略快。但这在日常使用中不太可能被发现,因为性能储备非常大。

Max. Load
 33.5 °C33.6 °C33.8 °C 
 33.4 °C34.2 °C32.7 °C 
 33.6 °C34.1 °C33 °C 
Maximum: 34.2 °C
Average: 33.5 °C
32.2 °C32.3 °C32 °C
31.8 °C32.5 °C32 °C
32.3 °C31.9 °C32.5 °C
Maximum: 32.5 °C
Average: 32.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  30.8 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68.1 %
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62.7 % -8%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59.6 % -12%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58.5 % -14%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47.2 % -31%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73.3 %
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64.8 % -12%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62.7 % -14%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61.8 % -16%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
% -100%
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Vivo X80 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø13.2 (11.5-15.7)
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø10.9 (9.64-15.4)
Vivo X80 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø46.8 (40.4-59.3)
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø41.7 (37.2-59.4)
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø43.7 (38.1-60.9)

发言人

Vivo X80 Pro的两个扬声器具有相对较好的声音输出。在高音量下,低音调不是很明显,这使得声音有点空洞。另外,可以通过USB-C接口连接耳机,或通过蓝牙无线连接。后者有多种音频编解码器(SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive、aptX TWS+和LDAC)可用。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.634.4252925.23127.826.74025.829.45032.537.56322.426.48024.535.710019.436.312516.541.316018.451.320012.854.62509.955.731511.358.940013.16350011.4726301171.380011.672100012.373.912501273.8160012.477.4200012.280.325001381.3315012.882400013.277.4500013.475.6630013.875800013.3721000013.368.41250013.567.11600013.158.1SPL24.989.4N0.676median 13median 72Delta0.89.135.233.421.727.818.627.921.721.33230.825.727.927.424.424.336.816.345.218.951.717.547.212.35615.757.911.658.511.866.512.468.711.672.312.574.113.172.212.571.413.171.912.871.412.877.212.971.713.367.713.472.813.767.913.76814.46713.759.125.284.20.759.9median 13.1median 67.91.56.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseVivo X80 ProXiaomi 12 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Vivo X80 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi 12 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 配备4700毫安时的vivo X80 Pro

消耗功率

在我们的测量中,vivo X80 Pro在空转时显示出功耗增加,尽管LTPO显示屏在这里实际上应该更经济,因为它也可以将刷新率降低到60赫兹以下。

在快速充电方面,这款vivo智能手机有很多优点。有线充电的容量为80瓦,在测试中,充满电的时间不到40分钟。50瓦的无线充电也是可能的,vivo提供相应的充电站作为选择。想为其他设备进行无线充电的用户可以把智能手机作为一个充电面,因为也支持反向无线充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.12 / 0.33 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.92 / 2.04 / 2.05 Watt
Load midlight 4.29 / 8.75 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Vivo X80 Pro
4700 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
5000 mAh
Oppo Find X5 Pro
5000 mAh
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 12 Pro
4600 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
10%
13%
8%
9%
-14%
6%
Idle Minimum *
0.92
0.58
37%
1.24
-35%
0.88
4%
0.94
-2%
1.255 ?(0.7 - 3.18, n=15)
-36%
Idle Average *
2.04
0.71
65%
1.39
32%
1.57
23%
1.24
39%
Idle Maximum *
2.05
1.16
43%
1.42
31%
1.6
22%
1.34
35%
Load Average *
4.29
7.07
-65%
3.58
17%
5.06
-18%
5.7
-33%
5.49 ?(3.58 - 8.04, n=15)
-28%
Load Maximum *
8.75
11.32
-29%
6.99
20%
7.91
10%
8.12
7%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Vivo X80 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1: Ø5.76 (1.144-11.4)
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1: Ø5.27 (0.963-10.9)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Vivo X80 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.59 (8.78-10.7)
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.58 (7.9-10.8)
Vivo X80 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.378 (1.241-1.559)
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.933 (0.856-1.058)

电池寿命

Vivo X80 Pro的4700毫安时电池比一些竞争对手的电池小一点,但它仍然能够产生良好的运行时间。只有Galaxy S22 UltraAxon 40 Ultra相比之下要好一些。在 "WLAN浏览 "测试中,在调整显示亮度为150cd/m²的情况下,只有中兴的智能手机更好。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
28h 48min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 103)
14h 12min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 43min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 32min
Vivo X80 Pro
4700 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
5000 mAh
Oppo Find X5 Pro
5000 mAh
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 12 Pro
4600 mAh
Battery Runtime
20%
5%
30%
4%
Reader / Idle
1728
1973
14%
1269
-27%
2446
42%
2036
18%
H.264
943
1078
14%
1142
21%
1468
56%
788
-16%
WiFi v1.3
852
844
-1%
788
-8%
975
14%
766
-10%
Load
272
410
51%
367
35%
296
9%
337
24%

Pros

+ 明亮而准确的120赫兹显示屏
+ 轻快的系统
+ 良好的硬件
+ 优秀的指纹传感器
+ 非常好的摄影机

Cons

- 没有6GHz的WLAN
- 许多视频模式只有1080p版本
- 部分限制性的电源管理

评语。最好的Android 智能手机之一

在审查中。vivo X80 Pro。样品设备由德国vivo公司提供。
在审查中。vivo X80 Pro。样品设备由德国vivo公司提供。

Vivo X80 Pro是目前最好的Android 智能手机之一。在测试下,它的准确的LTPO AMOLED显示屏得分很高,可以变得非常明亮。设备也几乎齐全,包括快速无线充电、甚至更快的有线充电、IP认证、红外爆破器、良好的双扬声器和优秀的指纹传感器等功能。

vivo X80 Pro在大多数领域给人留下了深刻印象,但也有一些批评之处。

在技术方面,vivo没有留下太多的批评空间。相机能拍出很好的照片,但在拍摄时,低分辨率很快就会成为一个破坏者。至少用户不必担心内部存储可能不足。另一方面,对于那些想广泛使用超高清甚至8K的人来说,一个额外的存储选项肯定是可取的。在我们看来,忽略6GHz频段的无线局域网是不可理解的,尤其是在这个价格范围内,这应该是强制性的。如果能有三年以上的软件更新,那就更好了。

vivo X80 Pro的强大替代品是 三星Galaxy S22 UltraOppo Find X5 Pro,但也有更便宜的 谷歌Pixel 6 Pro.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

在欧洲大陆,vivo X80 Pro似乎可以通过流行的在线零售商广泛购买。例如,亚马逊提供的智能手机在法国意大利价格为1299欧元。

在欧洲大陆以外,供应情况变得零星。vivo X80 Pro英国亚马逊缺货。(截至2022年9月2日)。我们在美国的任何地方都找不到这款智能手机,而它在加拿大的报价是通过MI4Canada提供,价格为1,495.00加元。在澳大利亚,Best Mobile Phone提供该智能手机,价格为1,680.00澳元。新加坡的Shopee Mall新加坡的Shopee Mall以1,699.00新加坡元的价格出售该智能手机。

所有列出的价格截至2022年9月2日,可能会有变化。

Vivo X80 Pro - 08/30/2022 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
89%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
54 / 70 → 77%
Weight
88%
Battery
90%
Display
94%
Games Performance
60 / 64 → 94%
Application Performance
87 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%
Audio
80 / 90 → 88%
Camera
80%
Average
83%
89%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Vivo X80 Pro智能手机评测。拥有巨大指纹传感器的Primus相机
Daniel Schmidt, 2022-09- 3 (Update: 2022-09- 3)