谷歌 Pixel 10 智能手机评测：六个月后的Android 仍是一款出色的紧凑型产品，但也有一些不足之处

Name: Google Pixel 10
Brand: Google

通过折扣完善像素

谷歌Pixel 10已经重新定位为2026年更引人注目的紧凑型Android ，尤其是在目前打折的街头价格上。Tensor G5 SoC、PixelSnap、方便的 5x 长焦镜头、一系列不错的 AI 功能以及谷歌的长期更新承诺，都为 Pixel 的基础版与新款智能手机的竞争提供了强有力的理由。但也有一些缺点需要注意。
Vaidyanathan Subramaniam, 👁 Vaidyanathan Subramaniam (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 04/09/2026 🇺🇸 🇳🇱 ...
Google Pixel 5G AI Android Smartphone

结论像素下降、价格下降，2026 年值得购买

Pixel 10 正处于一个有趣的时刻，因为紧凑型智能手机再次获得了强劲的发展势头。谷歌保留了 Pixel 9 熟悉的、广受好评的设计元素，同时增加了一些值得关注的功能，包括 PixelSnap 和 Tensor G5。

有了 Pixel 10，你就能按照谷歌的意图获得一流的Android 体验。虽然它缺少 Pro 机型上的 100x Pro Res Zoom 和 Video Boost 等功能，但 Magic Cue、Pixel Screenshots、Camera Coach 等熟悉的 Gemini 功能都是标配。

Tensor G5 SoC 符合 Pixel 10 的需求，但在原始性能方面无法与竞争对手相提并论，即使谷歌延迟了很久的 GPU 驱动程序更新也是如此。

Test device courtesy of Google India

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

虽然 Pixel 10 总体上能拍出不错的照片，但与 Pixel 9 相比，它的不足之处就显现出来了，因为谷歌选择配备 5 倍长焦镜头，而牺牲了较弱的超广角镜头和主摄像头。

其他缺点还包括非 LTPO 面板、较慢的 Wi-Fi 吞吐量和存储性能以及较长的充电时间。

如果你想获得更新周期可靠的第一方Android 体验，但又不倾向于 Pro 机型，那么 Pixel 10 是一个不错的选择，尤其是在折扣价的情况下。而如果对 5 倍长焦镜头不感兴趣，Pixel 9 在 2026 年依然是一款物美价廉的产品。

不过，性能鉴赏家和规格表爱好者最好还是选择小米、三星、vivo 和Apple 的新产品，它们的溢价更高一些。

Pros

+ 卓越的制造质量

+ 带 Qi 无线充电功能的 PixelSnap

+ 明亮的 24 位 OLED 面板

+ 一流的Android 16 体验

+ 出色的照片和方便的 5 倍远摄镜头

Cons

- Wi-Fi 和存储速度相对较慢

- 超宽摄像头和主摄像头降级

- 非 LTPO 面板，没有 480 Hz 选项

- 张力 G5 无法与当前竞争产品相媲美

- 与 Pixel 9 相比，并非真正令人信服的升级产品

价格和供应情况

谷歌 Pixel 10 在全球和美国亚马逊均有销售，256 GB 版本售价 711 美元（不过价格似乎暂时有波动）。

在印度，Pixel 10 仅提供 256 GB 版本，可在谷歌印度商店购买。购买，价格为 74,999 ₹ 或通过亚马逊 IN 购买，价格为 70,838 ₹ 。

结论像素下降、价格下降，2026 年值得购买
规格
外观IP68 防护等级，背面非常光亮
硬件：Qi 2 无线充电速度较慢，没有 UWB
软件：Android 16 QPR3，更新周期长
通信和全球导航卫星系统：残疾人 Wi-Fi 性能
电话和通话质量：美国机型仅限 eSIM 卡
相机尽管超广角镜头和主镜头降级，但仍不失为日常拍摄的好帮手
配件和保修：Pixel Care+ 仅在美国
输入设备和操作：快速超声波指纹识别器
显示屏：24 位非 LTPO Super Actua 面板，无 480 Hz 闪烁选项
性能尽管有新的 GPU 驱动程序，Tensor G5 仍在苦苦挣扎
游戏：在降低细节要求的情况下，最高可达到 60 帧/秒
排放：预期生产线的热输出和节流
能耗：与 Pixel 9 相比，耗电量和电池续航时间均有提升
Notebookcheck 对谷歌 Pixel 10 的印象
潜在竞争对手比较

在评测了谷歌 Pixel 10 Pro XL和像素 10 Pro之后，我们现在对基本款 Pixel 10 进行一次全面的了解。与 Pixel 10 Pro 机型一样，Pixel 10 的大部分升级都在内部进行，同时保留了我们熟悉的像素 9设计。

这次的变化包括升级到 Tensor G5SoC、UFS 4.0 存储、1080 万像素 3x 长焦摄像头、略微增大的电池和 Pixelsnap 磁性附件。

规格

Pixel 10 GK2MP (Pixel 10 Series)

Processor

Google Tensor G5 8c/8t, 1 x 3.8 GHz ARM Cortex-X4, 5 x 3.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A725, 2 x 2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A520, Laguna

Graphics adapter

IMG DXT-48-1536

Memory

12 GB

, LPDDR5X

Display

6.30 inch 20:9, 2424 x 1080 pixel 421 PPI, Capacitive, GGL FLEB-00D-00, OLED, Actua non-LTPO, HDR / Peak brightness: 2,000 nits / 3,000 nits, 8-bit, Always-on display, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB

, 233 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB Type-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity, Ambient light, Accelerometer, Gyrometer, Magnetometer, Barometer, Temperature, LDAF, Spectral, Flicker, OTG

Networking

Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 6, Dual SIM Dual Standby (DSDS), GSM: Bands 850/900/1800/1900 MHz, UMTS/HSPA+/HSDPA: Bands 1/2/4/5/8, LTE: Bands 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/14/17/18/19/20/21/25/26/28/29/30/32/38/39/40/41/42/48/66/71/75, 5G Sub-6: Bands 1/2/3/5/7/8/12/14/20/25/26/28/30/38/40/41/66/71/75/76/77/78/79, NB-IoT: Bands 23/255/256, LTE: Bands 1/3/7/28, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.6 x 152.8 x 72

Battery

4970 mAh Lithium-Ion, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 24 h

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 16

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix Wide Quad PD (f/1.7, 1/2", 0.8 µm, 25 mm eq., 82° FoV, OIS+EIS) + 13 MP Ultra-wide Quad PD (f/2.2, 1/3.1", 1.12 µm, 13 mm eq., 120° FoV) + 10.8 MP Telephoto Dual PD (5x Optical zoom, f/3.1, 1/3.2", 1.22 µm, 104 mm eq., 23° FoV, OIS+EIS), 4K 60 fps (non-HDR), 4K 30 fps (10-bit HDR), 1080p 240 fps (slow motion)
Secondary Camera: 10.5 MPix Dual PD autofocus (f/2.2, 1/3.1", 1.22 µm, 20 mm eq., 95° FoV), 4K 60 fps (non-HDR), 4K 30 fps (10-bit HDR)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo with Spatial Audio, Keyboard: On screen, USB Type-C to Type-C cable (USB 2.0), SIM tray ejector, Gemini, Magic Cue, Circle to Search, Live Translate, Call Assist, Pixel Screenshots, Journal, NotebookLM, 12 Months Warranty, SAR (India): 0.99 W/Kg (Head); 0.98 W/Kg (Body), Camera2 API: Full, IP68, Dual-Band GNSS GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, Beidou, QZSS, NavIC, Google Cast, fanless

Weight

204 g

Price

999 Euro

Links

Google homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

外观IP68 防护等级，背面非常光亮

6.3 英寸的 Pixel 10 有靛蓝、冰霜、柠檬草和黑曜石（我们的机型）四种颜色可供选择。与 Pixel 9 相比，Pixel 10 的重量稍重一些，为 204 克，但拿在手里很舒适。

重量分布让握持手机非常舒适，相机岛也没有增加太多的重量，尽管它现在比以前稍大一些。

前后玻璃面板均采用康宁大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2，并由谷歌称之为航天器级的铝制边框连接在一起。

与 Pixel 9 一样，Pixel 10 的背面玻璃也是亮面的，这给它带来了高档的外观，但同时也是一个指纹磁铁，尽管谷歌声称不会这样做。

虽然不能完全防水或防尘，但 Pixel 10 的防尘防水等级达到了 IP68（最高 1.5 米，30 分钟）。

尺寸比较

硬件：Qi 2 无线充电速度较慢，没有 UWB

从 Pixel 9 开始，谷歌重新安排了一些物理元素。SIM 卡托盘现在位于左上方，可容纳一张 nano SIM 卡和一张额外的 eSIM 卡。

扬声器被放置在 USB 3.2 Type-C 接口的右侧，这样在横向握持手机时就不会被挡住。

与支持 25 W Qi 2.2 标准的 Pixel 10 Pro XL 不同，Pixel 10 的无线充电功率仅限于 15 W Qi 2。

虽然手机包含 NFC，但谷歌省略了超宽带（UWB）芯片。此外，Pixel 10 也没有红外爆破器或 microSD 读卡器。

软件：Android 16 QPR3，更新周期长

作为 Pixel 的标准配置，Pixel 10 搭载了Android 16（目前为 QPR3），并在其上叠加了谷歌的 Pixel UI。 Android 16 QPR3 带来了几项值得注意的改进，包括手电筒控制、对AndroidLinux 开发环境的图形用户界面支持、桌面模式、主题图标等。

此外，我们还获得了大量 Google AI 功能，包括双子座、像素截图、Magic Cue 和 Camera Coach 等。

尽管如此，100 倍专业变焦、夜视视频和视频增强等一些 AI 功能是专业版机型的专利，基本版 Pixel 10 手机并不具备这些功能。

Pixel 10 附带谷歌的七年软件支持承诺，包括定期的 Pixel Drops 和安全补丁。

可持续性

Pixel 10 的包装是 100% 无塑料的。根据谷歌的说法，外壳、电池、磁铁、触觉引擎、逻辑板和印刷电路板使用了 100% 的可回收材料，而 13 个塑料部件中有 10 个使用了至少 53% 的可回收塑料。

通信和全球导航卫星系统：残疾人 Wi-Fi 性能

与 Pixel 10 Pro 甚至 Pixel 9 不同，Pixel 10 不提供 Wi-Fi 7，仅限于双频 Wi-Fi 6E 和蓝牙 6.0。

在我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器进行的测试中，在视线清晰的 1 米距离内，Pixel 10 的 Wi-Fi 吞吐量明显低于 Pixel 10 Pro 和 Pixel 9，即使在 6 GHz 6E 频段上也是如此。

Networking: iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | iperf3 receive AXE11000

Networking / iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Google Pixel 9 Wi-Fi 7	1855 (1826^min - 1894^max) MBit/s +130%
Vivo X300 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be	1843 (1759^min - 1875^max) MBit/s +128%
Google Pixel 10 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be	1571 MBit/s +94%
Average Wi-Fi 6E (229 - 1888, n=82)	1377 MBit/s +70%
Average of class Smartphone (508 - 1945, n=84, last 2 years)	1274 MBit/s +58%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Wi-Fi 7	1210 (998^min - 1383^max) MBit/s +50%
Xiaomi 17	1086 (1009^min, 1009.29^P1 - 1197^max) MBit/s +34%
Apple iPhone 17 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be	1020 (745^min, 765.88^P1 - 1165^max) MBit/s +26%
Google Pixel 10 Wi-Fi 6E	808 (405^min - 819^max) MBit/s

Networking / iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Google Pixel 9 Wi-Fi 7	1851 (886^min - 1889^max) MBit/s +150%
Vivo X300 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be	1802 (1718^min - 1822^max) MBit/s +144%
Google Pixel 10 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be	1742 (1566^min - 1859^max) MBit/s +136%
Apple iPhone 17 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be	1658 (1579^min, 1592.34^P1 - 1684^max) MBit/s +124%
Average of class Smartphone (451 - 1870, n=84, last 2 years)	1394 MBit/s +89%
Average Wi-Fi 6E (598 - 1874, n=82)	1337 MBit/s +81%
Xiaomi 17	1262 (1051^min, 1068.98^P1 - 1324^max) MBit/s +71%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Wi-Fi 7	1201 (1184^min - 1221^max) MBit/s +63%
Google Pixel 10 Wi-Fi 6E	739 (662^min - 799^max) MBit/s

Networking / iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy S25 Wi-Fi 7	1058 (518^min - 1295^max) MBit/s +36%
Google Pixel 9 Wi-Fi 7	955 (739^min - 994^max) MBit/s +23%
Average Wi-Fi 6E (227 - 1810, n=66)	954 MBit/s +23%
Google Pixel 10 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be	928 (844^min - 962^max) MBit/s +19%
Apple iPhone 17 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be	777 (620^min, 623.19^P1 - 1073^max) MBit/s 0%
Google Pixel 10 Wi-Fi 6E	777 (371^min - 822^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (52.5 - 1851, n=155, last 2 years)	687 MBit/s -12%

Networking / iperf3 receive AXE11000
Apple iPhone 17 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be	1592 (1420^min, 1437.98^P1 - 1631^max) MBit/s +106%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Wi-Fi 7	1167 (1006^min - 1197^max) MBit/s +51%
Average Wi-Fi 6E (442 - 1787, n=68)	940 MBit/s +22%
Google Pixel 10 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be	916 (903^min - 923^max) MBit/s +19%
Google Pixel 9 Wi-Fi 7	911 (857^min - 930^max) MBit/s +18%
Google Pixel 10 Wi-Fi 6E	772 (707^min - 820^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (52.2 - 1721, n=155, last 2 years)	729 MBit/s -6%

Google Pixel 10 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø794 (405-819)

Apple iPhone 17 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1020 (745-1165)

Google Pixel 10 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø739 (662-799)

Apple iPhone 17 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1658 (1579-1684)

Google Pixel 10 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø764 (371-822)

Apple iPhone 17 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø777 (620-1073)

Google Pixel 10 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø772 (707-820)

Apple iPhone 17 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1592 (1420-1631)

Pixel 10 提供广泛的卫星导航支持，包括 L1+L5 双频 GPS、GLONASS（L1/G1）、Galileo（E1+E5a）、北斗（B1C+B2a）、QZSS（L1+L5）和 NavIC（IRNSS L5）。

似乎不支持 EGNOS 和 GAGAN 星基增强系统 (SBAS)。

在室内，Pixel 10 难以获得足够的卫星信号，但室外接收相当准确。

Pixel 10 的导航性能与 Apple iPhone 16 Pro，无论是在路上还是在密集的住宅区。

GNSS 对比：Apple iPhone 16 Pro 与 Google Pixel 10

电话和通话质量：美国机型仅限 eSIM 卡

美国型号的 Pixel 10 (GLBW0) 仅支持 eSIM 卡，但支持频段为 258、260 和 261 的 5G mmWave 以及 Sub-6 GHz。印度版本（GK2MP）仅支持 5G Sub-6 GHz 频率，但包括一个可拆卸的 SIM 卡托盘（nano-SIM 和 eSIM）。

通话和联系人通过谷歌拨号器和谷歌通讯录管理，并集成了 Magic Cue 和谷歌助理功能。

Jio True5G 的通话质量很好，支持 Vo5G（VoNR）。无论是免提还是听筒，通话双方都能听得很清楚，在高音量下几乎没有失真。

相机尽管超广角镜头和主镜头降级，但仍不失为日常拍摄的好帮手

Pixel 10 继续采用与 Pixel 9 相同的 1050 万像素自拍摄像头，配备 f/2.2 光圈、自动对焦和 95° 视场角。

自拍效果良好，色彩还原度高，肤色自然，细节清晰。自拍相机拍出的人像也很不错，虚化效果很好，既能隔离主体，又不会剪切特征。

谷歌将超广角摄像头和主后置摄像头降级为 1300 万像素和 4800 万像素传感器（分别低于 Pixel 9 的 4800 万像素和 5000 万像素）的决定引起了一些人的不满。

超广角摄像头拍摄的图像乍看之下与 Pixel 9 不相上下，但有明显的柔和感。

虽然 Pixel 10 的 4800 万像素主摄像头拍摄的图像看起来与 Pixel 9 的 5000 万像素传感器拍摄的图像非常相似，但在下面的图像对比中，从朦胧的树叶中可以明显看出降级的痕迹。

将主摄像头裁剪为 2 倍也会增加大量噪点，不过即使是 Pixel 9 的 2 倍变焦照片也会出现噪点。

这次，Pixel 10 配备了专用的 5 倍远摄镜头，这比依赖 Pixel 9 的数码变焦更好。

在光线良好的情况下，5 倍远摄镜头可以满足社交媒体的休闲拍摄需求。不过，它无法与一加 13和 iPhone 16 Pro，因为我们看到细节和色彩都有所减少，噪点也有所增加。

尽管如此，低光拍摄的效果要好得多，与前代产品相比，Pixel 10 的整体图像效果有了明显改善。

有趣的是，与 Pixel 10 Pro XL 不同，Pixel 10 的主摄像头可以在很短的距离内很好地对焦，从而获得不错的微距拍摄效果。

自拍、主摄像头和 5x 长焦摄像头都可以拍摄 4K 60 fps 视频。不过，10 位 HDR 仅限于 FHD 分辨率。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Ultra-wide 0.5x Main camera Main camera 2x zoom 5x Optical zoom Low light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

在使用我们的 ColorChecker Passport 进行照明控制的情况下，主相机的 DeltaE 2000 值最低为 6.43。测试图中的细节再现良好。

在 1 勒克斯条件下，我们看到色彩偏差明显增大，但测试图中的细节仍然清晰可辨。

配件和保修：Pixel Care+ 仅在美国

除了 USB 2.0 Type-C 数据线、SIM 卡弹出工具和文件之外，谷歌并没有在包装盒中捆绑很多附件。

在印度，Pixel 10 提供标准的一年保修服务。两年Pixel Care+ 计划价格为 179 美元，仅限美国用户。

此外，还有一个 199 美元的 Pixel Care+ 计划，涵盖丢失和被盗，适用于除纽约以外的全美各地。

输入设备和操作：快速超声波指纹识别器

Pixel 10 的超声波指纹识别器认证速度很快。此外，还有一种安全性较低的 2D 人脸解锁技术，在环境光线较好的情况下也能很好地工作。

触觉反馈非常出色，不过 Pixel 10 Pro XL 在这方面感觉更明显、更清晰。

这款手机的确切触控响应速度尚不清楚，但无论是在游戏中还是在一般主观使用中，它的触控响应速度都很快。

默认的 Gboard 键盘包括 AI 驱动的写作工具，用于校对和重写文本。

显示屏：24 位非 LTPO Super Actua 面板，无 480 Hz 闪烁选项

与 Pixel 10 Pro 不同的是，基本款 Pixel 10 使用的是非 LTPO 2,424 x 1,080 20:9 Super Actua 显示屏，这意味着它的刷新率只能在 60 Hz 和 120 Hz 之间变化，不能降到 1 Hz。

在 HDR 模式下，谷歌称该面板的亮度可达 2,000 尼特，峰值亮度为 3,000 尼特。在我们的测试中，显示屏的亮度均匀性达到了 86%，在环境光传感器启动的情况下达到了 1,862 尼特的峰值，而在 HDR 播放（25% 窗口）时则达到了 1,692 尼特的最高值。

Pixel 10 支持 HDR10，但不支持杜比视界。


1713 cd/m²	1791 cd/m²	1735 cd/m²
1862 cd/m²	1850 cd/m²	1602 cd/m²
1809 cd/m²	1823 cd/m²	1600 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

GGL FLEB-00D-00 tested with X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3

Maximum: 1862 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1753.9 cd/m² Minimum: 1.72 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 1850 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.96 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.74}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.99}
95.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2
CCT: 6898 K

	Google Pixel 10 OLED, 2424x1080, 6.3"	Google Pixel 9 OLED, 2424x1080, 6.3"	Xiaomi 17 LTPO AMOLED , 2656x1220, 6.3"	Google Pixel 10 Pro OLED, 2856x1280, 6.3"	Apple iPhone 17 OLED, 2622x1206, 6.3"	Vivo X300 AMOLED, 2640x1216, 6.3"	Samsung Galaxy S25 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.2"
Screen		32%	-3%	41%	9%	13%	-13%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	1850	2063 12%	1030 -44%	2161 17%	1138 -38%	1537 -17%	1301 -30%
Brightness (cd/m²)	1754	1914 9%	1021 -42%	2198 25%	1127 -36%	1523 -13%	1311 -25%
Brightness Distribution (%)	86	84 -2%	98 14%	94 9%	96 12%	96 12%	98 14%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.96	0.7 64%	1.44 27%	0.7 64%	1.07 45%	1.4 29%	3.1 -58%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.25	2.2 48%	3.68 13%	1.8 58%	2.99 30%	2.6 39%	4.4 -4%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3	1.2 60%	2.5 17%	0.8 73%	1.8 40%	2.1 30%	2.3 23%
Gamma	2.2 ^100%	2.23 ^99%	2.274 ^97%	2.19 ^100%	2.22 ^99%	2.28 ^96%	2.01 ^109%
CCT	6898 ^94%	6524 ^100%	6868 ^95%	6646 ^98%	6516 ^100%	6754 ^96%	6454 ^101%

* ... smaller is better

自然模式，默认色温（目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Pixel 10 可让您选择自然模式和自适应色彩模式。色彩校准前工作并不是我们见过的最好的，但自然模式是两种模式中更准确的。

ColorChecker 平均 dE2000：1.96。最大 dE2000： 4.25

自适应模式，默认色温（目标色彩空间：sRGB）

ColorChecker 平均 dE2000: 3.04.最大 dE2000： 5

自适应模式，默认色温（色彩空间目标：显示 P3）

ColorChecker 平均 dE2000：3.67。最大 dE2000：5.32

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

240.66 Hz
Amplitude: 83.3 %

The display backlight flickers at 240.66 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240.66 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7917 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在所有测试的亮度级别中，Pixel 10 显示屏以恒定的 240 Hz 频率闪烁。与 Pixel 10 Pro 系列不同的是，没有将 PWM 频率提高到 480 Hz 的可访问选项。

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）。

如需了解更多信息，请参阅我们的入门指南："PWM 为何如此令人头痛？"和 "分析：直流调光与 PWM".

我们的PWM 排名表概述了经评测设备的 PWM 测量值。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9.2 ms rise
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.89 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.45 ms rise
0.89 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.44 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.3 ms).

Pixel 10 采用 24 位面板（每个 RGB 通道 8 位），因此可以显示 1600 万种色彩。我们没有发现任何时间抖动的迹象。

室外观看时，最大亮度下的清晰度相当高。可视角度稳定，在极端情况下不会出现亮度和色彩损失。

性能尽管有新的 GPU 驱动程序，Tensor G5 仍在苦苦挣扎

在 CPU 性能方面，Pixel 10 的 Tensor G5 只能与骁龙 8s 第 4 代的单核性能。

Tensor G5 的性能落后，无法赶上 Apple iPhone 17, 小米 17和 vivo X300等高端旗舰 SoC。 Apple A19, 骁龙 8 第五代精英版和联发科 Dimensity 9500.

Geekbench 6.6
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192	3732 Points +61%
Xiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	3662 Points +58%
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	3397 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	3087 Points +33%
Google Pixel 10 Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 12288	2319 Points
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	2308 Points 0%
Average Google Tensor G5 (2279 - 2319, n=3)	2302 Points -1%
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	1798 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3883, n=195, last 2 years)	1794 Points -23%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	10842 Points +86%
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	9998 Points +72%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	9776 Points +68%
Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192	9456 Points +63%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	6314 Points +9%
Average Google Tensor G5 (5815 - 6314, n=3)	6079 Points +5%
Google Pixel 10 Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 12288	5815 Points
Average of class Smartphone (830 - 11811, n=195, last 2 years)	5310 Points -9%
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	4501 Points -23%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	2755585 Points +93%
Xiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	2545132 Points +78%
Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192	2158729 Points +51%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	1975467 Points +38%
Average of class Smartphone (264891 - 3269237, n=116, last 2 years)	1480273 Points +4%
Average Google Tensor G5 (1338955 - 1563512, n=3)	1443918 Points +1%
Google Pixel 10 Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 12288	1429288 Points
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	1338955 Points -6%
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	1022007 Points -28%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	20623 Points +24%
Xiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	19432 Points +17%
Google Pixel 10 Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 12288	16614 Points
Average Google Tensor G5 (15738 - 16614, n=3)	16118 Points -3%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	15738 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=158, last 2 years)	15025 Points -10%
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	13948 Points -16%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	13984 Points +44%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	11876 Points +22%
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	11566 Points +19%
Google Pixel 10 Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 12288	9744 Points
Average Google Tensor G5 (8446 - 9744, n=3)	9138 Points -6%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	8446 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone (1885 - 16690, n=127, last 2 years)	7744 Points -21%
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	6894 Points -29%
System
Xiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	19207 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	17132 Points +22%
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	14659 Points +4%
Google Pixel 10 Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 12288	14080 Points
Average Google Tensor G5 (12754 - 14080, n=3)	13238 Points -6%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	12881 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone (4117 - 21153, n=127, last 2 years)	11462 Points -19%
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	7593 Points -46%
Memory
Xiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	16964 Points +60%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	14759 Points +39%
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	11589 Points +9%
Google Pixel 10 Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 12288	10594 Points
Average Google Tensor G5 (7257 - 10594, n=3)	9136 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (2760 - 24052, n=127, last 2 years)	8816 Points -17%
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	8573 Points -19%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	7257 Points -31%
Graphics
Xiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	52356 Points +89%
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	46112 Points +66%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	33965 Points +22%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	30035 Points +8%
Average Google Tensor G5 (27761 - 30035, n=3)	29167 Points +5%
Google Pixel 10 Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 12288	27761 Points
Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 384996, n=127, last 2 years)	26627 Points -4%
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	20938 Points -25%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	2275 Points +5%
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	2245 Points +3%
Xiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	2234 Points +3%
Google Pixel 10 Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 12288	2177 Points
Average Google Tensor G5 (1813 - 2177, n=3)	1996 Points -8%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	1813 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone (1062 - 2587, n=127, last 2 years)	1721 Points -21%
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	1648 Points -24%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	35227 Points +80%
Xiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	23076 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	21837 Points +12%
Average of class Smartphone (3769 - 81594, n=116, last 2 years)	19849 Points +1%
Google Pixel 10 Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 12288	19584 Points
Average Google Tensor G5 (17652 - 19584, n=3)	18446 Points -6%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	17652 Points -10%

AImark - Score v3.x
Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192	35717 Points +2785%
Average of class Smartphone (293 - 307528, n=94, last 2 years)	16945 Points +1269%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	1893 Points +53%
Xiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	1789 Points +45%
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	1477 Points +19%
Average Google Tensor G5 (1238 - 1477, n=3)	1329 Points +7%
Google Pixel 10 Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 12288	1238 Points
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288	871 Points -30%

AI Benchmark - Score V6
Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	12223 Points +1424%
Average of class Smartphone (55.6 - 22780, n=78, last 2 years)	5248 Points +554%
Xiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	1098 Points +37%
Google Pixel 10 Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 12288	802 Points
Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384	797 Points -1%
Average Google Tensor G5 (761 - 802, n=3)	787 Points -2%

产品 PowerVR D 系列 DXT-48-1536iGPU 在 3DMark 和 GFXBench 测试中的表现优于 Pixel 9 中的 Mali G715 MP7。尽管更新到了新的v25.1 GPU 驱动程序但与竞争对手相比，iGPU 仍显逊色。

虽然新驱动程序带来的 Geekbench OpenCL 分数比我们之前看到的要好得多，但 GPU 的整体性能仍然远远落后于 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12和 Apple A19 GPU甚至上一代的 Adreno 830.

Geekbench 6.6 / GPU OpenCL
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	27611 Points +540%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	22896 Points +431%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	18373 Points +326%
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6615 Points +53%
Google Pixel 10 DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4315 Points
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3054 Points -29%

Geekbench 6.6 / GPU Vulkan
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	25432 Points +527%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	24021 Points +492%
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	23872 Points +488%
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6984 Points +72%
Google Pixel 10 DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4057 Points
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3610 Points -11%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	7101 Points +121%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6932 Points +116%
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6321 Points +97%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	4904 Points +53%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3232 Points +1%
Google Pixel 10 DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3214 Points
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2601 Points -19%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	7089 Points +122%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6854 Points +115%
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6311 Points +98%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	5022 Points +58%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3281 Points +3%
Google Pixel 10 DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3188 Points
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2567 Points -19%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	27327 Points +115%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	26476 Points +109%
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	25598 Points +102%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	21785 Points +72%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	13193 Points +4%
Google Pixel 10 DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	12687 Points
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8998 Points -29%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3134 Points +216%
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2532 Points +155%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	2124 Points +114%
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1023 Points +3%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1013 Points +2%
Google Pixel 10 DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	993 Points

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3145 Points +209%
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2566 Points +152%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	2197 Points +116%
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1083 Points +6%
Google Pixel 10 DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1017 Points
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1014 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	Points -100%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	121 fps +1%
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Google Pixel 10 DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps -50%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	946 fps +126%
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	761 fps +82%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	711 fps +70%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	534.3 fps +28%
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	419 fps 0%
Google Pixel 10 DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	418 fps
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	406 fps -3%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	121 fps +1%
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Google Pixel 10 DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps -50%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	502 fps +94%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	456 fps +76%
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	385 fps +49%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	338.5 fps +31%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	282 fps +9%
Google Pixel 10 DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	259 fps
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	257 fps -1%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Google Pixel 10 DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps -1%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	119 fps -1%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps -50%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	383 fps +109%
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	332 fps +81%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	268 fps +46%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	230 fps +26%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	207 fps +13%
Google Pixel 10 DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	183 fps
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	167 fps -9%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +82%
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +82%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +82%
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	75 fps +14%
Google Pixel 10 DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	66 fps
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps -9%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	59 fps -11%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	211 fps +193%
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	193 fps +168%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	179 fps +149%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	164.8 fps +129%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	81 fps +13%
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	80 fps +11%
Google Pixel 10 DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	72 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +38%
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +38%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +38%
Google Pixel 10 DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	87 fps
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	66 fps -24%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	64 fps -26%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps -31%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	146 fps +186%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	118 fps +131%
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	108 fps +112%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	69.8 fps +37%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	55 fps +8%
Google Pixel 10 DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	51 fps
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	40 fps -22%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +3%
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +3%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +3%
Google Pixel 10 DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	116 fps
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	100 fps -14%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	94 fps -19%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps -48%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	361 fps +191%
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	281 fps +127%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	279 fps +125%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	202.5 fps +63%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	127 fps +2%
Google Pixel 10 DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	124 fps
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	108 fps -13%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	61 fps +165%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	52 fps +126%
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	49 fps +113%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	29.6 fps +29%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	25 fps +9%
Google Pixel 10 DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	23 fps
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	19 fps -17%

Basemark GPUScore

Google Pixel 10 DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø35.6 (11-102.7)

Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø82.4 (21.6-360)

Google Pixel 10 DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø26.6 (9.29-89)

Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø74.2 (19.8-654)

Google Pixel 10 DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; Official Native; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.4: Ø9.36 (4.57-43.8)

Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; Official Native; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.4: Ø37.9 (24.7-59.7)

Google Pixel 10 DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.4: Ø9.19 (4.38-36.2)

Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.4: Ø33 (19.5-55.2)

浏览器性能比 Pixel 9 有了明显提高，但与三星和Apple 的同类产品相比仍有差距。

尽管如此，使用默认的 Chrome 浏览器进行日常浏览时依然流畅无阻。

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Apple iPhone 17 (Safari Mobile 26)	335.933 Points +66%
Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)	235.734 Points +17%
Average Google Tensor G5 (193.3 - 262, n=3)	219 Points +8%
Google Pixel 10 (Chrome 146 )	202.09 Points
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)	193.311 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (59.7 - 423, n=124, last 2 years)	153.7 Points -24%
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)	107.467 Points -47%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Apple iPhone 17 (Safari Mobile 26)	599 runs/min +62%
Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)	435 runs/min +18%
Google Pixel 10 (Chrome 146)	370 runs/min
Average Google Tensor G5 (343 - 370, n=3)	353 runs/min -5%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)	345 runs/min -7%
Average of class Smartphone (49.3 - 733, n=96, last 2 years)	233 runs/min -37%
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)	185 runs/min -50%

Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Apple iPhone 17 (Safari Mobile 26)	39.6 runs/min +92%
Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)	29.9 runs/min +45%
Xiaomi 17 (Chrome 141)	20.9 runs/min +1%
Average Google Tensor G5 (20.6 - 21.3, n=3)	20.8 runs/min +1%
Google Pixel 10 (Chrome 146)	20.6 runs/min
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)	20.6 runs/min 0%
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)	14.9 runs/min -28%
Average of class Smartphone (3.06 - 45.5, n=107, last 2 years)	14.7 runs/min -29%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 17 (Safari Mobile 26)	290 Points +55%
Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)	244 Points +30%
Google Pixel 10 (Chrome 146)	187 Points
Average Google Tensor G5 (174 - 187, n=3)	179.3 Points -4%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)	177 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (56 - 306, n=117, last 2 years)	140.8 Points -25%
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)	103 Points -45%
Xiaomi 17 (Chrome 141)	102 Points -45%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 17 (Safari Mobile 26)	110696 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)	95809 Points +28%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)	84055 Points +12%
Average Google Tensor G5 (74722 - 84281, n=3)	81019 Points +8%
Google Pixel 10 (Chrome 146)	74722 Points
Google Pixel 9	56737 Points -24%
Xiaomi 17 (Chrome 141)	50987 Points -32%
Average of class Smartphone (2800 - 126661, n=163, last 2 years)	49609 Points -34%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=135, last 2 years)	1100 ms * -135%
Google Pixel 9 (Chrome 129)	744.57 ms * -59%
Vivo X300 (Chrome 143)	663.7 ms * -42%
Xiaomi 17 (Chrome 141)	634.81 ms * -36%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)	472.5 ms * -1%
Average Google Tensor G5 (468 - 473, n=3)	470 ms * -1%
Google Pixel 10 (Chrome 146)	467.5 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S25 (Chrome 134)	389.3 ms * +17%
Apple iPhone 17 (Safari Mobile 26)	263.1 ms * +44%

* ... smaller is better

谷歌表示，它在所有 256 GB 及以上存储容量的 Pixel 10 机型中都使用了 UFS 4.0 存储。不过，在我们的测试中，实际存储性能似乎相对较低。

假设谷歌的规格是正确的，考虑到我们在 Pixel 10 Pro 和 Pixel 10 Pro XL 上看到的类似分数，这表明 Tensor G5 可能存在瓶颈。

	Google Pixel 10	Google Pixel 9	Xiaomi 17	Google Pixel 10 Pro	Vivo X300	Samsung Galaxy S25	Average 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-38%	95%	-14%	28%	20%	49%	7%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)	1762.72	1584.56 -10%	3943.44 124%	1492.74 -15%	2056.87 17%	3982.43 126%	3627 ?(1493 - 4384, n=52) 106%	2178 ?(270 - 4370, n=177, last 2 years) 24%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)	1660.39	256.48 -85%	3784.97 128%	1353.55 -18%	1997.76 20%	2256.71 36%	2661 ?(555 - 3484, n=52) 60%	1861 ?(103.2 - 4113, n=177, last 2 years) 12%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)	281.71	226.41 -20%	487.69 73%	264.44 -6%	332.61 18%	299.89 6%	382 ?(218 - 513, n=52) 36%	300 ?(47.6 - 614, n=177, last 2 years) 6%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)	421.08	266.19 -37%	643.31 53%	347.84 -17%	654.09 55%	51.76 -88%	402 ?(50.7 - 989, n=52) -5%	355 ?(9.4 - 1071, n=177, last 2 years) -16%

	Google Pixel 10	Google Pixel 9	Xiaomi 17	Google Pixel 10 Pro	Samsung Galaxy S25	Average 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
PCMark for Android		-56%	43%	-26%	38%	-1%	-25%
Storage 2.0 seq. read int. (MB/s)	2523.98	1592 ?(3.0.4061) -37%	3050 ?(3.0.4061) 21%	2296.31 -9%	3499 ?(3.0.4061) 39%	2650 ?(1504 - 4020, n=28) 5%	1598 ?(266 - 3344, n=91, last 2 years) -37%
Storage 2.0 seq. write int. (MB/s)	1781.95	250 ?(3.0.4061) -86%	2580 ?(3.0.4061) 45%	1078.56 -39%	3089 ?(3.0.4061) 73%	2347 ?(603 - 3548, n=28) 32%	1519 ?(184.1 - 3548, n=91, last 2 years) -15%
Storage 2.0 random read int. (MB/s)	40.9	25 ?(3.0.4061) -39%	62.9 ?(3.0.4061) 54%	36.54 -11%	58.6 ?(3.0.4061) 43%	49.8 ?(20.9 - 100.5, n=28) 22%	42.5 ?(15.3 - 74, n=91, last 2 years) 4%
Storage 2.0 random write int. (MB/s)	92.34	55.8 ?(3.0.4061) -40%	146.5 ?(3.0.4061) 59%	48.52 -47%	93.2 ?(3.0.4061) 1%	77.6 ?(11.9 - 130.3, n=28) -16%	69.7 ?(11.8 - 155.3, n=91, last 2 years) -25%
Storage 2.0 (Points)	137955	28089 ?(3.0.4061) -80%	189969 ?(3.0.4061) 38%	104562 -24%	187720 ?(3.0.4061) 36%	72231 ?(16494 - 227953, n=35) -48%	64289 ?(8882 - 227953, n=94, last 2 years) -53%

游戏：在降低细节要求的情况下，最高可达到 60 帧/秒

Pixel 10 可以 60 帧/秒的速度运行支持的游戏，但只能在中低设置下运行。由于某些原因，谷歌禁用了 DXT-48-1536 iGPU 的光线追踪功能。

在较高设置下，帧率会有所下降，但像《源氏冲击》这样的游戏在最高设置下仍能以接近 50 fps 的速度运行，而《PUBG Mobile》在高清和较高设置下的平均帧率约为 40 fps。

触摸响应对于休闲游戏来说足够了，但竞技游戏玩家可能更喜欢其他选项。Pixel UI 还缺乏游戏专用的自定义或覆盖功能。

所有游戏指标均使用GameBench Studio Pro应用程序记录。

Google Pixel 10; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 6.4.0_42040338_42314721: Ø57.6 (37-61)

Google Pixel 10; Genshin Impact; medium 120 fps; 6.4.0_42040338_42314721: Ø51.6 (39-61)

Google Pixel 10; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 6.4.0_42040338_42314721: Ø46.9 (39-60)

Google Pixel 10; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 4.3.0: Ø59.3 (36-62)

Google Pixel 10; PUBG Mobile; HD; 4.3.0: Ø39.7 (24-41)

Google Pixel 10; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 4.3.0: Ø39.8 (38-41)

排放：预期生产线的热输出和节流

温度

即使在满负荷工作的情况下，智能手机的表面温度也基本可以承受，屏幕和后盖的温度都能达到 40°C 左右。

Max. Load

Idle


40.6 °C	39.4 °C	35.6 °C
40.2 °C	38.2 °C	36.2 °C
38.6 °C	38.2 °C	34.8 °C

Maximum: 40.6 °C
Average: 38 °C


39.2 °C	37.6 °C	34.8 °C
39.8 °C	38.2 °C	35 °C
39.4 °C	36.4 °C	34.8 °C

Maximum: 39.8 °C
Average: 37.2 °C

Room Temperature 22 °C | Amprobe TMD-50 // Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

Pixel 10 在 3DMark 压力测试中的表现与 Pixel 9 相似，在Steel Nomad Light 压力测试中尤其稳定。

3DMark: Wild Life Stress Test Stability | Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability

3DMark / Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	96.8 % +47%
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	81.2 % +23%
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	72.8 % +11%
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	68.5 % +4%
Google Pixel 10 DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	65.8 %
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	58.9 % -10%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	52.7 % -20%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	88.7 % +24%
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	73.8 % +3%
Google Pixel 10 DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	71.4 %
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	71.3 % 0%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	65.4 % -8%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	47.5 % -33%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	46.7 % -35%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	97.3 % +11%
Google Pixel 10 DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	87.4 %
Google Pixel 9 Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	78.5 % -10%
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	74.7 % -15%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	65.4 % -25%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60.9 % -30%

Google Pixel 10 DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø13.5 (12.4-17.4)

Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø30.7 (28-38)

Google Pixel 10 DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø48.8 (43.4-66)

Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø105.2 (98.9-135.9)

Google Pixel 10 DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø6.7 (6.15-7.04)

Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.1: Ø16 (13.9-18.6)

发言人

Pixel 10 的扬声器音量接近 85 dB(A)，听筒兼作立体声扬声器。虽然低音不足，但扬声器的中高音还算不错。

手机支持多种蓝牙编解码器，但只提供 SBC 和 AAC 两种选择，与 OnePlus Buds Pro 3 连接时最大采样频率为 16 位/44 千赫，不支持 LHDC。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Google Pixel 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone 17 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

能耗：与 Pixel 9 相比，耗电量和电池续航时间均有提升

与 Pixel 9 相比，Pixel 10 的耗电量要少得多。不过小米 17和 iPhone 17在最大负载时的耗电量要低得多。

耗电量

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.15 / 0.36 Watt
Idle	0.88 / 1.29 / 1.4 Watt
Load	5.38 / 19.3 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Google Pixel 10 Tensor G5, 4970 mAh	Google Pixel 9 Tensor G4, 4700 mAh	Xiaomi 17 SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 7000 mAh	Google Pixel 10 Pro Tensor G5, 4870 mAh	Apple iPhone 17 A19, 3692 mAh	Vivo X300 Dimensity 9500, 5360 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S25 SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 4000 mAh	Average Google Tensor G5	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-8%	4%	-25%	-7%	-25%	-9%	-8%	-3%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	0.88	0.66 25%	0.7 20%	1.01 -15%	1.1 -25%	0.6 32%	0.47 47%	0.957 ?(0.88 - 1.01, n=3) -9%	0.872 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=144, last 2 years) 1%
Idle Average * (Watt)	1.29	1.49 -16%	1.4 -9%	1.65 -28%	1.3 -1%	2.02 -57%	1.04 19%	1.427 ?(1.29 - 1.65, n=3) -11%	1.458 ?(0.7 - 4.36, n=144, last 2 years) -13%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	1.4	1.78 -27%	1.7 -21%	2.05 -46%	1.5 -7%	2.08 -49%	1.07 24%	1.65 ?(1.4 - 2.05, n=3) -18%	1.646 ?(0.75 - 4.46, n=144, last 2 years) -18%
Load Average * (Watt)	5.38	7.44 -38%	5.9 -10%	7.25 -35%	7.6 -41%		13.33 -148%	5.67 ?(4.38 - 7.25, n=3) -5%	6.75 ?(2.9 - 14.9, n=113, last 2 years) -25%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	19.3	16.64 14%	11.7 39%	19.78 -2%	12 38%		16.38 15%	18.5 ?(16.3 - 19.8, n=3) 4%	11.3 ?(4.75 - 22, n=113, last 2 years) 41%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Google Pixel 10 Google Tensor G5; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.23 (1.048-11.7)

Xiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø8.46 (3.53-12.8)

Google Pixel 10 Google Tensor G5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.897 (0.752-1.131)

Xiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.977 (0.778-1.37)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Google Pixel 10 Google Tensor G5; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.72 (8.71-12)

Xiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.7 (10.1-11.7)

Google Pixel 10 Google Tensor G5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.897 (0.752-1.131)

Xiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.977 (0.778-1.37)

电池运行时间

与 Pixel 9 相比，Pixel 10 的电池容量仅增加了 270 毫安时，但在标准 WLAN 浏览测试中的运行时间延长了 8%，在 1080p H.264 视频播放中的运行时间延长了 52%，这两项测试的亮度均为 150 尼特。

这款手机支持高达 30 W 的功率输出，从零充满电大约需要 1.5 小时。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		29h 00min
WiFi Websurfing		17h 52min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness		8h 14min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		24h 45min
Load (maximum brightness)		3h 30min

	Google Pixel 10 Tensor G5, 4970 mAh	Google Pixel 9 Tensor G4, 4700 mAh	Xiaomi 17 SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 7000 mAh	Google Pixel 10 Pro Tensor G5, 4870 mAh	Apple iPhone 17 A19, 3692 mAh	Vivo X300 Dimensity 9500, 5360 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S25 SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 4000 mAh
Battery runtime		-3%	73%	6%	47%	9%	13%
Reader / Idle (h)	29	35 21%	72.7 151%	33.1 14%	66.7 130%		45.2 56%
H.264 (h)	24.8	16.3 -34%	36.1 46%	24 -3%	29.4 19%		26.5 7%
WiFi v1.3 (h)	17.9	16.5 -8%	30.9 73%	21.1 18%	20.1 12%	19.6 9%	18 1%
Load (h)	3.5	3.9 11%	4.3 23%	3.3 -6%	4.4 26%		3 -14%

Notebookcheck 对谷歌 Pixel 10 的印象

经过几次软件更新和价格折扣后，谷歌 Pixel 10 脱颖而出，成为一款可行的紧凑型Android 智能手机。然而，2026 年的竞争对手已经开始采用更高效的芯片组和更大的电池。

Back to the verdict

Google Pixel 10 - 04/08/2026 v8
Vaidyanathan Subramaniam

Chassis

89%

Keyboard

73 / 75 → 97%

Pointing Device

92%

Connectivity

62 / 69 → 90%

Weight

88%

Battery

90%

Display

90%

Games Performance

36 / 55 → 65%

Application Performance

76 / 85 → 90%

AI Performance

65%

Temperature

89%

Noise

100%

Audio

82 / 90 → 91%

Camera

86%

Average

81%

86%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
83.3%

Materials
60%

Packaging
100%

Power Use
93.8%

Repairability
60%

Software Updates
100%

Total Sustainability Score: 82.9%

潜在竞争对手比较

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 86%	Google Pixel 10 Google Tensor G5 ⎘ IMG DXT-48-1536 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: List Price: 999€	204 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.30" 2424x1080 421 PPI OLED
2. 84.9%	Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4 ⎘ ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 128 GB	List Price: 899€	198 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.30" 2424x1080 421 PPI OLED
3. 89.2%	Xiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB	Amazon: 1. $802.50 XIAOMI 15T PRO Ai 5G (Compat... 2. $787.50 XIAOMI 15 5G Ai (for Tmobile... 3. $199.50 XIAOMI Redmi 15 5G NFC (Comp... List Price: 650€	191 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.30" 2656x1220 464 PPI LTPO AMOLED
4. 88.9%	Google Pixel 10 Pro Google Tensor G5 ⎘ IMG DXT-48-1536 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: List Price: 1199€	207 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.30" 2856x1280 497 PPI OLED
5. 87.9%	Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19 ⎘ Apple A19 GPU ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB NVMe	List Price: 949 Euro	177 g	256 GB NVMe	6.30" 2622x1206 460 PPI OLED
6. 88%	Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500 ⎘ Arm Mali G1- Ultra MC12 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	List Price: 1049€	190 g	256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.31" 2640x1216 461 PPI AMOLED
7. 88.9%	Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	List Price: 899€	162 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.20" 2340x1080 416 PPI AMOLED

结论像素下降、价格下降，2026 年值得购买

Pros

Cons

价格和供应情况

Table of Contents

规格

外观IP68 防护等级，背面非常光亮

尺寸比较

硬件：Qi 2 无线充电速度较慢，没有 UWB

软件：Android 16 QPR3，更新周期长

可持续性

通信和全球导航卫星系统：残疾人 Wi-Fi 性能

电话和通话质量：美国机型仅限 eSIM 卡

相机尽管超广角镜头和主镜头降级，但仍不失为日常拍摄的好帮手

配件和保修：Pixel Care+ 仅在美国

输入设备和操作：快速超声波指纹识别器

显示屏：24 位非 LTPO Super Actua 面板，无 480 Hz 闪烁选项

自然模式，默认色温（目标色彩空间：sRGB）

自适应模式，默认色温（目标色彩空间：sRGB）

自适应模式，默认色温（色彩空间目标：显示 P3）

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能尽管有新的 GPU 驱动程序，Tensor G5 仍在苦苦挣扎

Basemark GPUScore

游戏：在降低细节要求的情况下，最高可达到 60 帧/秒

排放：预期生产线的热输出和节流

温度

3DMark 压力测试

发言人

Google Pixel 10 audio analysis

Apple iPhone 17 audio analysis

能耗：与 Pixel 9 相比，耗电量和电池续航时间均有提升

耗电量

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

电池运行时间

Notebookcheck 对谷歌 Pixel 10 的印象

潜在竞争对手比较

More articles related to this device

Related Articles

Transparency