Notebookcheck

惠普 Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng 变形本简短评测

Sascha Mölck, Stefanie Voigt (translated by Kangfei Zheng), 01/13/2017
Convertible / 2-in-1 Kaby Lake Touchscreen Windows

屏幕昏暗。惠普的这款变形本,市价在600欧元(约632美元)。 它提供了Kaby Lake处理器,IPS屏幕与1 TB 机械硬盘的硬件组合。 对于某些用户来说,这可能是一个有吸引力的选择,毕竟它还支持触控笔输入(Active Stylus)。

HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng (Pavilion x360 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-7200U
Graphics adapter
Intel HD Graphics 620, Core: 300-1000 MHz, 单通道, 21.20.16.4526
Memory
8192 MB 
, DDR3-1867, 单通道, 两个插槽(一个已占用)
Display
15.6 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, 支持触控笔(非压感), LG Philips, IPS, 全高清, 平滑表面, glossy: yes
Mainboard
Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH
Storage
WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0, 1000 GB 
, 5400 rpm, 880 GB free
Soundcard
Realtek ALC282 @ Intel Sunrise Point-LP PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Audio combo, Card Reader: SD, Sensors: 加速器,陀螺仪,电子罗盘, TPM 2.0
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 23.9 x 382 x 250
Battery
48 Wh Lithium-Ion, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 9 h
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: 巧克力键盘, Keyboard Light: no, Cyberlink Power Media Player 14, Cyberlink PowerDirector 14, McAfee LiveSafe (trial version), MS Office 365 (trial version), 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.3 kg, Power Supply: 300 g
Price
599 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
352 MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
314 MBit/s ∼100%
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
372 MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
125 MBit/s ∼34%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
390 MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
103 MBit/s ∼26%
166
cd/m²
189
cd/m²
211
cd/m²
161
cd/m²
205
cd/m²
219
cd/m²
166
cd/m²
189
cd/m²
210
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LG Philips
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 219 cd/m² Average: 190.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 74 %
Center on Battery: 205 cd/m²
Contrast: 683:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.2 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 6.86 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
59% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.27
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
120%
185%
20%
2%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
55 (23, 32)
30.8 (12.8, 18)
44%
53 (20, 33)
4%
42 (19, 23)
24%
43.2 (19.6, 23.6)
21%
Response Time Black / White *
26 (10, 16)
22 (11.2, 10.8)
15%
39 (12, 27)
-50%
22 (6, 16)
15%
30.8 (17.6, 13.2)
-18%
PWM Frequency
50 (20)
200 (90)
300%
350 (60)
600%
Screen
26%
16%
23%
25%
Brightness middle
205
225
10%
243
19%
266
30%
254
24%
Brightness
191
210
10%
248
30%
249
30%
230
20%
Brightness Distribution
74
85
15%
91
23%
85
15%
86
16%
Black Level *
0.3
0.22
27%
0.32
-7%
0.26
13%
0.26
13%
Contrast
683
1023
50%
759
11%
1023
50%
977
43%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
7.2
4.13
43%
5.44
24%
4.98
31%
4.23
41%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
12.7
9.36
26%
9.73
23%
11.82
7%
9.5
25%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.86
2.53
63%
4.74
31%
2.68
61%
2.87
58%
Gamma
2.27 97%
2.6 85%
2.38 92%
2.27 97%
2.35 94%
CCT
6983 93%
6360 102%
7799 83%
6583 99%
5965 109%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
38
39.8
5%
39.6
4%
36
-5%
40.35
6%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
59
62.5
6%
62.5
6%
57
-3%
63.48
8%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
73% / 47%
101% / 55%
22% / 22%
14% / 21%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 50 Hz ≤ 20 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 50 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 50 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17109 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms rise
↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
55 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23 ms rise
↘ 32 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39.5 ms).
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4787
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
11328
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
7282
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
126 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
326 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
35.12 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.7 %
Help
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
Intel Core i5-7200U
130 Points ∼60% +3%
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
Intel Core i7-6500U
128 Points ∼59% +2%
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
126 Points ∼58%
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U
114 Points ∼52% -10%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
Intel Core i5-6200U
113 Points ∼52% -10%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
Intel Core i5-7200U
332 Points ∼8% +2%
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
326 Points ∼7%
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
Intel Core i7-6500U
308 Points ∼7% -6%
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U
289 Points ∼7% -11%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
Intel Core i5-6200U
284 Points ∼6% -13%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
4787 Points ∼44%
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U
4399 Points ∼41% -8%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
Intel Core i5-6200U
4368 Points ∼40% -9%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
11328 Points ∼17%
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U
9846 Points ∼15% -13%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
Intel Core i5-6200U
9723 Points ∼15% -14%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
6297 Points ∼8%
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U
5733 Points ∼7% -9%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
2812 Points ∼58%
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U
2699 Points ∼55% -4%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
6425 Points ∼18%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
3484 Points ∼55%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
212.03 Points ∼60%
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
Intel Core i7-6500U
207.09 Points ∼59% -2%
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U
196.87 Points ∼56% -7%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3173 points
Help
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK
Radeon R7 M460, 6200U, Liteonit CV3-DE256
3651 Points ∼60% +15%
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8
3607 Points ∼59% +14%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
Radeon R5 M430, 7200U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
3550 Points ∼58% +12%
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0
3173 Points ∼52%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0
3026 Points ∼50% -5%
WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0
Transfer Rate Minimum: 50.9 MB/s
Transfer Rate Maximum: 101.5 MB/s
Transfer Rate Average: 81.6 MB/s
Access Time: 18.4 ms
Burst Rate: 208.9 MB/s
CPU Usage: 8.7 %
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng
WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
Samsung MZYTY256HDHP
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK
Liteonit CV3-DE256
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
6%
11043%
8268%
8778%
Write 4k QD32
1.098
1.055
-4%
246.3
22332%
197.6
17896%
232
21029%
Read 4k QD32
0.844
1.029
22%
368.7
43585%
275.3
32518%
281.5
33253%
Write 4k
1.047
1.097
5%
106.7
10091%
86.67
8178%
63.65
5979%
Read 4k
0.357
0.373
4%
35.66
9889%
19.88
5469%
27.05
7477%
Write 512
48.12
51.21
6%
274.5
470%
242
403%
356.3
640%
Read 512
31.37
33.01
5%
408
1201%
397.4
1167%
384.5
1126%
Write Seq
102
106
4%
476.5
367%
270
165%
450.7
342%
Read Seq
102.4
106.9
4%
517.5
405%
458.6
348%
487
376%
3DMark 11 Performance
1445 points
Help
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK
AMD Radeon R7 M460, Intel Core i5-6200U
2137 Points ∼4% +58%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
AMD Radeon R5 M430, Intel Core i5-7200U
1643 Points ∼3% +21%
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U
1506 Points ∼3% +11%
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1355 Points ∼3%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1280 Points ∼3% -6%
low med. high ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 39 22.6 18.2 5.8 fps
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.63330.931.630.62531.232.130.330.731.23134.833.531.131.834.84029.430.829.330.729.45028.429.93129.628.46328.229.329.427.528.28027.427.42626.527.410025.527.42625.925.512524.525.824.524.824.516024.524.524.223.724.520023.923.823.122.823.925022.523.122.922.322.531522.522.321.821.122.540022.821.920.920.422.850022.821.820.119.722.86302221.119.6192280025.323.419.518.825.3100025.924.719.718.425.912502826.319.417.528160031.128.920.317.631.1200030.927.819.217.530.925002927.318.717.729315026.623.619.117.926.6400025.423.521.11825.4500021.220.218.818.321.2630019.118.918.418.219.1800018.918.718.418.318.91000018.418.518.318.318.41250018.218.218.218.218.21600018.618.318.218.218.6SPL38.836.831.730.538.8N2.72.41.61.42.7median 23.9median 23.4median 19.6median 18.3median 23.9Delta2.12.81.31.92.140.637.939.137.937.440.538.338.539.138.241.837.737.73933.432.237343033.436.334.435.333.733.937.737.732.931.331.535.133.930.932.131.53333.33232.531.331.332.73333.138.73332.4343131.932.63231.532.832.833.530.428.933.632.329.229.831.529.33030.632303029.93032.937.534.131.631.132.730.932.33232.830.930.929.727.928.533.528.529.428.930.326.928.728.929.528.928.927.626.227.129.126.227.825.528.426.727.626.22726.126.126.925.625.529.625.826.126.727.126.826.625.726.2252525.924.32526.225.72524.925.924.924.324.425.925.625.623.823.623.227.525.124.724.324.924.8252423.923.323.323.322.822.929.424.725.424.925.225.224.22422.9232322.82221.733.626.125.726.426.124.223.3232222.322.321.520.421.537.729.527.529.126.725.72323.421.921.721.721.22020.840.228.928.127.826.625.623.323.721.421.521.519.719.419.333.725.525.72524.623.222.22120.820.420.419.518.418.733.424.323.723.623.52221.421.119.818.918.918.71818.33325.124.62423.522.121.120.719.518.618.618.417.91837.226.62625.424.823.521.420.519.318.618.617.717.617.637.126.925.92624.822.820.620.218.5181817.517.317.438.827.627.426.725.822.720.420.118.418.218.217.417.517.237.124.624.523.522.620.919.51917.917.117.117.317.217.237.825.92524.323.421.41918.317.417.217.217.217.317.234.920.720.419.519.217.917.617.417.317.217.217.217.317.235.719.319.118.618.217.717.417.317.317.117.117.417.317.332.617.917.817.617.617.417.217.217.217.217.217.417.517.426.217.517.517.517.417.417.517.317.417.617.617.417.417.422.217.317.417.517.317.417.417.317.417.317.317.517.317.320.417.317.317.317.317.317.317.317.317.217.217.317.317.318.117.417.417.317.317.317.317.317.217.317.317.430.230.347.936.936.43635.233.632.231.830.930.630.630.21.41.46.22.62.52.42.321.71.71.51.51.51.4median 17.9median 18median 33.4median 25.1median 25median 24.3median 24.6median 22.7median 21.1median 20.5median 19.3median 18.6median 18.6median 17.72.72.75.12.633.43.13.23.232.62.72.72.6hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ngApple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz)

Noise Level

Idle
31.7 / 31.7 / 31.7 dB(A)
Load
38.8 / 36.8 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)
Max. Load
 26 °C29 °C28.6 °C 
 23.9 °C28.1 °C27.7 °C 
 23.5 °C24.5 °C28 °C 
Maximum: 29 °C
Average: 26.6 °C
29.9 °C32 °C29.1 °C
29.4 °C29.6 °C27 °C
28.3 °C25.6 °C24.5 °C
Maximum: 32 °C
Average: 28.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  37.9 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.8 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.3 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28 °C / 82.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+0.8 °C / 1.4 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.831.631.82533.930.733.93133.931.833.94031.930.731.95030.129.630.16327.627.527.68027.126.527.110027.225.927.212527.924.827.916030.623.730.620036.422.836.425051.422.351.431556.921.156.940056.820.456.850052.619.752.663055.61955.680065.718.865.710006518.465125062.417.562.416006117.661200061.317.561.325005917.759315060.817.960.8400063.31863.3500058.318.358.3630057.618.257.6800062.118.362.11000061.818.361.81250059.218.259.21600058.218.258.2SPL73.530.573.5N32.51.432.5median 58.3median 18.3median 58.3Delta71.9735.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ngApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (65 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.43 / 0.58 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 5.9 / 9.2 / 9.3 Watt
Load midlight 35.6 / 32.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge 38)
5h 48min
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing 1.3
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 48 Wh
401 min ∼15% +15%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB
7200U, Radeon R5 M430, 35 Wh
373 min ∼14% +7%
HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh
348 min ∼13%
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK
6200U, Radeon R7 M460, 35 Wh
335 min ∼13% -4%
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
6500U, HD Graphics 520, 42 Wh
299 min ∼11% -14%

Pros

+ IPS屏幕
+ 全高清
+ 充足的大容量存储
+ 支持触控笔

Cons

- 屏幕昏暗
- 高负载下,存在风扇噪声
- 一般的续航时间
- 无Type-C型USB
In review: HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng. Test model provided by Cyberport.de
In review: HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng. Test model provided by Cyberport.de

惠普提供了一个15.6英寸变形本,它有足够的性能应对大多数的任务。 低负载下,笔记本电脑运行安静,几乎不发烫。1TB机械硬盘提供了大量的存储空间,用户同样可以将其更换为SSD(打开外壳后)。 不存在维护底盖。 键盘很适合家庭使用。 在我们的无线局域网测试中,Pavilion的电池续航能力一般,这意味着它不是移动办公的理想选择。

屏幕不错,但不算优秀。亮度低是该测试机型的致命弱点。

由于处于600欧元(约632美元)的价位,惠普必须展现更多。IPS屏幕具有良好的视角和优秀的对比度。键盘,触摸板和触摸屏运作良好。屏幕反应迅速,输入快捷,并可以用手指或触控笔操作。 尽管该机型有很多优点,但它的缺点仍会将把许多潜在的买家拒之门外。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里

HP Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng - 12/22/2016 v6(old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
74 / 98 → 75%
Keyboard
72%
Pointing Device
86%
Connectivity
48 / 80 → 60%
Weight
61 / 35-78 → 61%
Battery
87%
Display
75%
Games Performance
54 / 68 → 79%
Application Performance
74 / 87 → 85%
Temperature
96%
Noise
89%
Audio
63 / 91 → 69%
Camera
42 / 85 → 49%
Average
71%
77%
Convertible - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 惠普 Pavilion x360 15-bk102ng 变形本简短评测
Sascha Mölck, 2017-01-13 (Update: 2017-01-14)