对 OnePlus 15T 的评价
OnePlus 15T 智能手机外观时尚，手感优质，在日常使用中给人留下了深刻的印象。得益于出色的超声波传感器、无可挑剔的高端芯片组和美轮美奂的 OLED 面板，OnePlus 的这款迷你旗舰手机让紧凑型智能手机的粉丝们心跳加速。
对于这款外形小巧的手机来说，它的电池续航时间也非常出色。
OnePlus 15T 是否存在可能的缺陷？很遗憾，有。由于在中国以外的地区缺乏可用性，我们不得不接受软件方面的某些限制--例如 eSIM 或 WearOS 支持--尽管拥有多语言包和谷歌整合功能的 ColorOS 在欧洲也很容易使用，这与来自远东的小米手机不同。
在蜂窝频率支持方面，OnePlus 手机也不能否认自己的出身。
不过，进口 OnePlus 15T 的劣势因其低廉的价格而得到了弥补。不到 600 欧元的整体价格在紧凑型手机中确实不错，因此是Galaxy S26 或 Pixel 10 Pro 的有趣替代品。
Pros
Cons
OnePlus 15T 的价格和上市时间
- $648.37OnePlus 15R, 12GB RAM + 256GB Storage, Dual-SIM, Unlocked Android Smartphone, Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, 7400mAh Battery, Mint Breeze
- $931.19OnePlus 15, 16GB RAM + 512GB Storage, Dual-SIM, Unlocked Android Smartphone, Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, 7300mAh Battery, Infinite Black
- $664.99OnePlus 15R, 12GB RAM + 256GB Storage, Dual-SIM, Unlocked Android Smartphone, Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, 7400mAh Battery, Charcoal Black
OnePlus 15T 的规格
构造和功能：Android 手持电话，IP69 防水等级，边缘纤薄
OnePlus 依靠与旗舰产品 旗舰机型 1515T 机型一样的设计。由于采用了金属边框和玻璃后壳，这款手机的防水等级达到了 IP69，手感非常出色。
尺寸和重量与 Apple iPhone 17但 OnePlus 15T 的电池容量是 iPhone 17 的两倍多。更令人印象深刻的是，OnePlus 成功地将显示屏边缘做得超薄，屏占比接近 91%。
与 OnePlus 15 相比，T 机型只有一个 USB 2.0 端口。除此之外，这款小巧的Android 手机还配备了 NFC、红外端口、双频 GNSS 以及 UFS 4.1 闪存和 LPDDR5X Ultra RAM。
通讯和操作OnePlus 15T 配备 Wi-Fi 7 和超声波指纹传感器
除了蓝牙 6.0，OnePlus 15T 还支持现代 Wi-Fi 7 标准。包括 6 GHz 频道在内的传输速度很高，但一致性一般。
当涉及到 LTE 频率时，这款小巧的Android 手机显示出在欧洲使用的弱点。OnePlus 15T 既不能使用频段 20，也不能使用频段 32。
不过，在 5G 网络中，德语国家没有任何限制。
在操作方面，OnePlus 15T 小兄弟的优势在于 一加 15的优势就凸显出来了。触摸屏感觉非常灵敏、快速。
由于采用了超声波手指压力传感器，这款小巧的 OnePlus 手机解锁非常快速可靠。振动电机（X 轴）也提供了高质量的触觉反馈。
| Networking | |
| OnePlus 15T | |
| iperf3 receive GT-BE19000 WiFi7 | |
| iperf3 transmit GT-BE19000 WiFi7 | |
| Vivo X300 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Xiaomi 17 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Honor Magic8 Pro Air | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive GT-BE19000 WiFi7 | |
| iperf3 transmit GT-BE19000 WiFi7 | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive GT-BE19000 WiFi7 | |
| iperf3 transmit GT-BE19000 WiFi7 | |
软件和可持续性：OnePlus 为其顶级手机提供Android 16
OnePlus 15T 预装的是 ColorOS，而不是全球通用的 OxygenOS。不过，总体来说差别不大。支持德语和Android Auto，但不支持 WearOS 手表或 eSIM。
更新的持续时间也是个问号。制造商通常不会为中国市场提供任何相关信息。通常情况下，OnePlus 15 应在六年内收到安全更新。
由于 OnePlus 15T 没有正式进入欧洲市场，因此可维修性受到很大限制，而且与中国设备的惯例一样，我们无法找到任何有关二氧化碳排放量或所含回收材料细节的信息。
摄像头OnePlus 15T 提供长焦和 OIS 功能
OnePlus 15T 的小巧和价格区间对相机系统的负面影响最大。与哈苏的合作现在是 OPPO 独家而 OnePlus 的内置图像传感器相当小，因此亮度不高。
5000 万像素的主摄像头只配备了 1/1.56 英寸的传感器，虽然在白天和暗处都能拍出不错的照片，但顶级画质看起来就不一样了。它缺乏清晰度和动态效果。正如我们的对比照片所显示的，OnePlus 的紧凑型智能手机仍然比方便的 iPhone 17来自Apple 。
OnePlus 15T 没有超广角摄像头，但由于配备了 5000 万像素长焦镜头，它可以实现 3.5 倍光学变焦。
由于主摄像头拍摄的是 24 毫米的相对广角照片，因此在我们看来，增加一个带 OIS 的长焦镜头更有意义。
显示屏OnePlus 15T 配备 165 Hz OLED 面板
6.32 英寸 165 Hz AMOLED 面板的像素密度高达 460 ppi，分辨率为 1,216 像素，表现非常出色。在 APL18 测量中，我们相当准确地达到了广告宣传的 1800 尼特最大亮度。
不过，HDR 峰值亮度（3,600 尼特）的测量值要低很多，但 3,125 cd/m² 也足以达到良好的 HDR 效果。
OnePlus 宣称，在 70 cd/m² 以下采用极高频 PWM 调光（3,840 Hz）来控制亮度。
在亮度较高时，15T 会切换到类似 DC 的调光模式。我们测得的基本频率仅为 120 Hz，振幅为 18%--尽管有高频调光模式，但对于对 PWM 敏感的人来说，这两个值都不是最佳值。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1119 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.22 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.74}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.98}
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.243
CCT: 7147 K
| OnePlus 15T OLED, 2640x1216, 6.3" | Vivo X300 AMOLED, 2640x1216, 6.3" | Xiaomi 17 LTPO AMOLED , 2656x1220, 6.3" | Honor Magic8 Pro Air OLED, 2640x1216, 6.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 33% | 12% | 35% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1119 | 1537 37% | 1030 -8% | 1324 18% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1101 | 1523 38% | 1021 -7% | 1311 19% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 96 | 96 0% | 98 2% | 98 2% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.22 | 1.4 37% | 1.44 35% | 0.93 58% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.18 | 2.6 50% | 3.68 29% | 2.07 60% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.2 | 2.1 34% | 2.5 22% | 1.5 53% |
| Gamma | 2.243 98% | 2.28 96% | 2.274 97% | 2.224 99% |
| CCT | 7147 91% | 6754 96% | 6868 95% | 6383 102% |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Vivo X300 | |
| OnePlus 15T | |
| Honor Magic8 Pro Air | |
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Vivo X300 | |
| Honor Magic8 Pro Air | |
| OnePlus 15T | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 120.7 Hz Amplitude: 18 % |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 120.7 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 120.7 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7885 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 12.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.2 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池寿命：Android 配备大容量电池和高端 SoC 的紧凑型智能手机
有了这款小巧的Android 手机，在芯片组方面就没有必要妥协了。OnePlus 15T 采用了强大的 骁龙 8 第五代精英版由于其 Adreno 840不仅在 CPU 基准测试中，而且在图形基准测试中都获得了非常高的分数。
不过，在 3DMark 压力测试中，OnePlus 15T 的性能急剧下降了 50%，这大大降低了我们的评分。
OnePlus 的迷你旗舰智能手机采用 7500 毫安时大容量硅碳电池。该储能电池的最大充电功率为 100 W 或 50 W。在我们调整显示屏亮度为 150 cd/m² 的实际电池测试中，OnePlus 15T 实现了近 1.5 天的出色电池续航时间。
| Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score | |
| OnePlus 15T | |
| Average of class Smartphone (59.7 - 423, n=126, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (70.1 - 272, n=7) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=135, last 2 years) | |
| Vivo X300 | |
| Xiaomi 17 | |
| OnePlus 15T | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (284 - 799, n=13) | |
| Honor Magic8 Pro Air | |
* ... smaller is better
| OnePlus 15T | Vivo X300 | Xiaomi 17 | Honor Magic8 Pro Air | Average 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -38% | -10% | -32% | -23% | -49% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 4115.87 | 2056.87 -50% | 3943.44 -4% | 3567.89 -13% | 3717 ? -10% | 2235 ? -46% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 4076.12 | 1997.76 -51% | 3784.97 -7% | 339.02 -92% | 3210 ? -21% | 1911 ? -53% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 578.74 | 332.61 -43% | 487.69 -16% | 377.83 -35% | 407 ? -30% | 306 ? -47% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 721.05 | 654.09 -9% | 643.31 -11% | 821.54 14% | 493 ? -32% | 360 ? -50% |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.5 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.8 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.5 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi 17 | |
| Vivo X300 | |
| Honor Magic8 Pro Air | |
| OnePlus 15T | |
OnePlus 15T audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (22.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(-) | highs are not linear (15% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi 17 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| OnePlus 15T 7500 mAh | Vivo X300 5360 mAh | Xiaomi 17 7000 mAh | Honor Magic8 Pro Air 5500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S26 4300 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 34.3 | 19.6 -43% | 30.9 -10% | 20.3 -41% | 17.7 -48% |
Notebookcheck 对 OnePlus 15T 的总体印象
凭借 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 SoC 和 7,500 mAh 超大容量电池，OnePlus 15T 让用户在紧凑型手机中获得了真正的续航能力。
OnePlus 15T
- 04/24/2026 v8
Marcus Herbrich
Total Sustainability Score: 潜在竞争对手比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 86%  | OnePlus 15T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $648.37 OnePlus 15R, 12GB RAM + 256G... 2. $931.19 OnePlus 15, 16GB RAM + 512GB... 3. $664.99 OnePlus 15R, 12GB RAM + 256G... List Price: 600€ | 194 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.32" 2640x1216 460 PPI OLED |
2. 88%  | Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500 ⎘ Arm Mali G1- Ultra MC12 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: List Price: 1049€ | 190 g | 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.31" 2640x1216 461 PPI AMOLED |
3. 89.2%  | Xiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $779.50 XIAOMI 15T PRO Ai 5G (Compat... 2. $736.25 XIAOMI 15 5G Ai (for Tmobile... 3. $460.00 XIAOMI Redmi Note 15 Pro+ Pl... List Price: 650€ | 191 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.30" 2656x1220 464 PPI LTPO AMOLED |
4. 88.3%  | Honor Magic8 Pro Air MediaTek Dimensity 9500 ⎘ Arm Mali G1- Ultra MC12 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $13.80 ShouBao Compatible with Hono... 2. $10.79 Ibywind for Honor Magic8 Pro... 3. $14.98 Puccy Privacy Screen Protect... List Price: 800€ | 155 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.31" 2640x1216 461 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
