Notebookcheck Logo
回顾 OnePlus 15T

OnePlus 15T 评测:难以置信的电池续航能力让紧凑型智能手机的竞争者黯然失色

不能否认它的起源。

作为 OnePlus 15 的替代品,这款手机更方便、更便宜,配备了最好的硬件和 XXL 电池--是Apple iPhone 17 的 2 倍多。在这篇评测中,我们将看看 OnePlus 15T 是否值得购买,或者选择旗舰产品 OnePlus 15 是否合理。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android 5G Wi-Fi 7 Touchscreen Smartphone

对 OnePlus 15T 的评价

OnePlus 15T 智能手机外观时尚,手感优质,在日常使用中给人留下了深刻的印象。得益于出色的超声波传感器、无可挑剔的高端芯片组和美轮美奂的 OLED 面板,OnePlus 的这款迷你旗舰手机让紧凑型智能手机的粉丝们心跳加速。

对于这款外形小巧的手机来说,它的电池续航时间也非常出色。

OnePlus 15T 是否存在可能的缺陷?很遗憾,有。由于在中国以外的地区缺乏可用性,我们不得不接受软件方面的某些限制--例如 eSIM 或 WearOS 支持--尽管拥有多语言包和谷歌整合功能的 ColorOS 在欧洲也很容易使用,这与来自远东的小米手机不同。

在蜂窝频率支持方面,OnePlus 手机也不能否认自己的出身。

不过,进口 OnePlus 15T 的劣势因其低廉的价格而得到了弥补。不到 600 欧元的整体价格在紧凑型手机中确实不错,因此是Galaxy S26 或 Pixel 10 Pro 的有趣替代品。

Pros

+ 明亮的 OLED 面板,165 Hz 频率
+ 功能强大的芯片组
+ 超长运行时间
+ 高质量外壳,防护等级达 IP69

Cons

- 明显的 SoC 跳频
- 没有深度的扬声器
- 更新问号
- 供货限制

OnePlus 15T 的价格和上市时间

迄今为止,OnePlus 15T 仅面向中国市场推出,零售价为 4300 日元,约合 550 欧元。作为从深圳贸易公司进口的产品,起价570 欧元。目前似乎不太可能在全球推出。

Amazon Logo
  • $648.37
    OnePlus 15R, 12GB RAM + 256GB Storage, Dual-SIM, Unlocked Android Smartphone, Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, 7400mAh Battery, Mint Breeze
  • $931.19
    OnePlus 15, 16GB RAM + 512GB Storage, Dual-SIM, Unlocked Android Smartphone, Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, 7300mAh Battery, Infinite Black
  • $664.99
    OnePlus 15R, 12GB RAM + 256GB Storage, Dual-SIM, Unlocked Android Smartphone, Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, 7400mAh Battery, Charcoal Black

OnePlus 15T 的规格

OnePlus 15T (15 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 8c/8t, 2 x 4.6 GHz Qualcomm Oryon Gen 3 Prime, 6 x 3.6 GHz Qualcomm Oryon Gen 3 Performance, Oryon v3
Graphics adapter
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5X Ultra Pro
Display
6.32 inch 19.5:9, 2640 x 1216 pixel 460 PPI, capacitrive Touchscreen, OLED, Crystal Shield Glass, HDR, 165 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB 
, 455 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6.0, 2G GSM: 850/900/1800 MHz 3G WCDMA: Frequenzbänder 1/2/4/5/8 4G LTE FDD: Bänder 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/18/19/26/28/66 4G LTE TDD: Frequenzbänder 34/38/39/40/41/42/43/48 5G NR: n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n18/n26/n28/n38/n40/n41/n66/n48/n77/n78, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.4 x 150.6 x 71.8
Battery
7500 mAh Silicon-Carbon
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 16
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, 24 mm, 1/1.56", OIS) + 50 MPix (f/2.8, 85 mm, tele, 3.5x optical zoom, OIS)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.4, 23 mm)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, charger, USB cable, info material, case, ColorOS, 12 Months Warranty, GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS, NavIC (L5), Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR Vivid,, fanless, waterproof
Released
03/24/2026
Weight
194 g
Price
600 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

构造和功能:Android 手持电话,IP69 防水等级,边缘纤薄

OnePlus 15T 的颜色选择
ⓘ OnePlus
OnePlus 15T 的颜色选择

OnePlus 依靠与旗舰产品 旗舰机型 1515T 机型一样的设计。由于采用了金属边框和玻璃后壳,这款手机的防水等级达到了 IP69,手感非常出色。

尺寸和重量与 Apple iPhone 17但 OnePlus 15T 的电池容量是 iPhone 17 的两倍多。更令人印象深刻的是,OnePlus 成功地将显示屏边缘做得超薄,屏占比接近 91%。

与 OnePlus 15 相比,T 机型只有一个 USB 2.0 端口。除此之外,这款小巧的Android 手机还配备了 NFC、红外端口、双频 GNSS 以及 UFS 4.1 闪存和 LPDDR5X Ultra RAM。

OnePlus 15T 智能手机
OnePlus 15T 智能手机
OnePlus 15T 智能手机
OnePlus 15T 智能手机

通讯和操作OnePlus 15T 配备 Wi-Fi 7 和超声波指纹传感器

除了蓝牙 6.0,OnePlus 15T 还支持现代 Wi-Fi 7 标准。包括 6 GHz 频道在内的传输速度很高,但一致性一般。

当涉及到 LTE 频率时,这款小巧的Android 手机显示出在欧洲使用的弱点。OnePlus 15T 既不能使用频段 20,也不能使用频段 32。

不过,在 5G 网络中,德语国家没有任何限制。

在操作方面,OnePlus 15T 小兄弟的优势在于 一加 15的优势就凸显出来了。触摸屏感觉非常灵敏、快速。

由于采用了超声波手指压力传感器,这款小巧的 OnePlus 手机解锁非常快速可靠。振动电机(X 轴)也提供了高质量的触觉反馈。

Networking
OnePlus 15T
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 receive GT-BE19000 WiFi7
1951 (min: 1727) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit GT-BE19000 WiFi7
1354 (min: 960) MBit/s ∼98%
Vivo X300
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1843 (min: 1759) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1802 (min: 1718) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi 17
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1086 (min: 1009) MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1262 (min: 1051) MBit/s ∼70%
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
760 (min: 648) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1569 (min: 1025) MBit/s ∼87%
Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1257 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1468 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive GT-BE19000 WiFi7
1871 (min: 1791) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 transmit GT-BE19000 WiFi7
1381 (min: 1354) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1279 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1402 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive GT-BE19000 WiFi7
1147 (min: 343) MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 transmit GT-BE19000 WiFi7
848 (min: 341) MBit/s ∼61%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700175018001850190019502000Tooltip
Honor Magic8 Pro Air 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø760 (648-907)
Honor Magic8 Pro Air 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1569 (1025-1737)
OnePlus 15T 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit GT-BE19000 WiFi7; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1353 (960-1511)
OnePlus 15T 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive GT-BE19000 WiFi7; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1951 (1727-2032)

软件和可持续性:OnePlus 为其顶级手机提供Android 16

OnePlus 15T 预装的是 ColorOS,而不是全球通用的 OxygenOS。不过,总体来说差别不大。支持德语和Android Auto,但不支持 WearOS 手表或 eSIM。

更新的持续时间也是个问号。制造商通常不会为中国市场提供任何相关信息。通常情况下,OnePlus 15 应在六年内收到安全更新。

由于 OnePlus 15T 没有正式进入欧洲市场,因此可维修性受到很大限制,而且与中国设备的惯例一样,我们无法找到任何有关二氧化碳排放量或所含回收材料细节的信息。

主屏幕
主屏幕
快速控制
快速控制
设置页面
设置页面

摄像头OnePlus 15T 提供长焦和 OIS 功能

与 OnePlus 15T 前置摄像头自拍
与 OnePlus 15T 前置摄像头自拍

OnePlus 15T 的小巧和价格区间对相机系统的负面影响最大。与哈苏的合作现在是 OPPO 独家而 OnePlus 的内置图像传感器相当小,因此亮度不高。

5000 万像素的主摄像头只配备了 1/1.56 英寸的传感器,虽然在白天和暗处都能拍出不错的照片,但顶级画质看起来就不一样了。它缺乏清晰度和动态效果。正如我们的对比照片所显示的,OnePlus 的紧凑型智能手机仍然比方便的 iPhone 17来自Apple 。

OnePlus 15T 没有超广角摄像头,但由于配备了 5000 万像素长焦镜头,它可以实现 3.5 倍光学变焦。

由于主摄像头拍摄的是 24 毫米的相对广角照片,因此在我们看来,增加一个带 OIS 的长焦镜头更有意义。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Low light
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
5.8 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
5 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
8 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus 15T: 7.89 ∆E min: 2.37 - max: 12.46 ∆E
ColorChecker
7.8 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
6 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
11 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus 15T: 9.32 ∆E min: 3.13 - max: 14.24 ∆E

显示屏OnePlus 15T 配备 165 Hz OLED 面板

6.32 英寸 165 Hz AMOLED 面板的像素密度高达 460 ppi,分辨率为 1,216 像素,表现非常出色。在 APL18 测量中,我们相当准确地达到了广告宣传的 1800 尼特最大亮度。

不过,HDR 峰值亮度(3,600 尼特)的测量值要低很多,但 3,125 cd/m² 也足以达到良好的 HDR 效果。

OnePlus 宣称,在 70 cd/m² 以下采用极高频 PWM 调光(3,840 Hz)来控制亮度。

在亮度较高时,15T 会切换到类似 DC 的调光模式。我们测得的基本频率仅为 120 Hz,振幅为 18%--尽管有高频调光模式,但对于对 PWM 敏感的人来说,这两个值都不是最佳值。

1109
cd/m²
1101
cd/m²
1097
cd/m²
1110
cd/m²
1119
cd/m²
1108
cd/m²
1103
cd/m²
1078
cd/m²
1085
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1119 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1101.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1119 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.22 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.74}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.99}
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.243
CCT: 7147 K
OnePlus 15T
OLED, 2640x1216, 6.3"
Vivo X300
AMOLED, 2640x1216, 6.3"
Xiaomi 17
LTPO AMOLED , 2656x1220, 6.3"
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
OLED, 2640x1216, 6.3"
Screen
33%
12%
35%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
1119
1537
37%
1030
-8%
1324
18%
Brightness (cd/m²)
1101
1523
38%
1021
-7%
1311
19%
Brightness Distribution (%)
96
96
0%
98
2%
98
2%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.22
1.4
37%
1.44
35%
0.93
58%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.18
2.6
50%
3.68
29%
2.07
60%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.2
2.1
34%
2.5
22%
1.5
53%
Gamma
2.243 98%
2.28 96%
2.274 97%
2.224 99%
CCT
7147 91%
6754 96%
6868 95%
6383 102%

* ... smaller is better

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Vivo X300
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2386 cd/m² +37%
OnePlus 15T
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
1745 cd/m²
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
1654 cd/m² -5%
Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Vivo X300
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
4072 cd/m² +30%
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3254 cd/m² +4%
OnePlus 15T
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3125 cd/m²

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120.7 Hz
Amplitude: 18 %

The display backlight flickers at 120.7 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120.7 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7892 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低亮度
最低亮度
25% 亮度
25% 亮度
50% 亮度
50% 亮度
75% 亮度
75% 亮度
100% 亮度
100% 亮度

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图)

灰度(色彩模式:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(色彩模式:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
ColorChecker (色彩模式:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
ColorChecker (色彩模式:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色域(色彩模式:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色域(色彩模式:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6 ms rise
↘ 0.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
12.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.1 ms rise
↘ 0.3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.2 ms).

性能、排放和电池寿命:Android 配备大容量电池和高端 SoC 的紧凑型智能手机

有了这款小巧的Android 手机,在芯片组方面就没有必要妥协了。OnePlus 15T 采用了强大的 骁龙 8 第五代精英版由于其 Adreno 840不仅在 CPU 基准测试中,而且在图形基准测试中都获得了非常高的分数。

不过,在 3DMark 压力测试中,OnePlus 15T 的性能急剧下降了 50%,这大大降低了我们的评分。

OnePlus 的迷你旗舰智能手机采用 7500 毫安时大容量硅碳电池。该储能电池的最大充电功率为 100 W 或 50 W。在我们调整显示屏亮度为 150 cd/m² 的实际电池测试中,OnePlus 15T 实现了近 1.5 天的出色电池续航时间。

Geekbench 6.6
Single-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (3498 - 3831, n=15)
3671 Points +1%
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
3662 Points +1%
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
3621 Points
Vivo X300
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288
3397 Points -6%
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
3397 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3883, n=191, last 2 years)
1829 Points -49%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (9979 - 12383, n=15)
11112 Points +1%
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
10976 Points
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
10842 Points -1%
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
10166 Points -7%
Vivo X300
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288
9998 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 11811, n=191, last 2 years)
5432 Points -51%
3DMark
Wild Life Unlimited Score
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
29901 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (23088 - 30892, n=13)
28296 Points -5%
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
26989 Points -10%
Vivo X300
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288
26476 Points -11%
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
25598 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (271 - 30892, n=173, last 2 years)
12000 Points -60%
Wild Life Extreme
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
7621 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (6289 - 8329, n=14)
7380 Points +8%
Vivo X300
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288
7089 Points +3%
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
6856 Points
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
6311 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (61 - 8263, n=173, last 2 years)
3173 Points -54%
Solar Bay Score
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
14986 Points +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (10958 - 14403, n=12)
13051 Points +5%
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
12398 Points
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
12146 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (703 - 14986, n=77, last 2 years)
9717 Points -22%
Steel Nomad Light Score
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
3271 Points +19%
Vivo X300
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288
3145 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (2566 - 3198, n=10)
2891 Points +5%
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
2756 Points
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
2566 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (132 - 3271, n=141, last 2 years)
1412 Points -49%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
120 fps +100%
Vivo X300
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288
120 fps +100%
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
120 fps +100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (60 - 120, n=14)
101.9 fps +70%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.2 - 166, n=185, last 2 years)
61.2 fps +2%
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
60 fps
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
374 fps +23%
Vivo X300
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288
361 fps +18%
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
305 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (203 - 378, n=15)
304 fps 0%
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
281 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 378, n=185, last 2 years)
128 fps -58%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
120 fps +100%
Vivo X300
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288
120 fps +100%
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
120 fps +100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (60 - 120, n=14)
99.8 fps +66%
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
60 fps
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 144, n=186, last 2 years)
49.3 fps -18%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
151 fps +19%
Vivo X300
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288
146 fps +15%
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
127 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (65 - 145, n=15)
118.7 fps -7%
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
108 fps -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 151, n=185, last 2 years)
49.2 fps -61%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
62 fps +17%
Vivo X300
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288
61 fps +15%
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
53 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (35 - 62, n=14)
51.7 fps -2%
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
49 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.54 - 62, n=187, last 2 years)
22.6 fps -57%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.7
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
834 Points +53%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5210, n=94, last 2 years)
709 Points +30%
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
698 Points +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (511 - 843, n=13)
639 Points +17%
Vivo X300
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288
612 Points +12%
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
545 Points
Half Precision NPU 1.7
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 36297, n=94, last 2 years)
2864 Points +426%
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
833 Points +53%
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
646 Points +19%
Vivo X300
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288
621 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (486 - 843, n=13)
619 Points +14%
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
544 Points
Quantized NPU 1.7
Average of class Smartphone
  (133 - 49889, n=94, last 2 years)
4212 Points +224%
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
1744 Points +34%
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
1409 Points +8%
Vivo X300
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288
1409 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (974 - 1986, n=13)
1390 Points +7%
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
1299 Points
CrossMark
Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (1698 - 2856, n=10)
2362 Points +18%
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
2356 Points +18%
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
2177 Points +9%
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
1999 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (376 - 2856, n=106, last 2 years)
1211 Points -39%
Productivity
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
2012 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (1380 - 2366, n=10)
1971 Points +17%
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
1851 Points +10%
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
1687 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (388 - 2366, n=106, last 2 years)
1101 Points -35%
Creativity
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
1806 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (1357 - 2123, n=10)
1780 Points +14%
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
1765 Points +13%
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
1559 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (310 - 2123, n=106, last 2 years)
1004 Points -36%
Responsiveness
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
9768 Points +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (6210 - 12907, n=10)
9630 Points +36%
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
7094 Points
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
6872 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (466 - 13042, n=106, last 2 years)
3582 Points -50%
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
271.964 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (59.7 - 423, n=126, last 2 years)
156.7 Points -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (70.1 - 272, n=7)
148 Points -46%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone
  (257 - 28190, n=135, last 2 years)
1090 ms * -108%
Vivo X300
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288
663.7 ms * -26%
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288
634.81 ms * -21%
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
524.8 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (284 - 799, n=13)
459 ms * +13%
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384
371.6 ms * +29%

* ... smaller is better

OnePlus 15TVivo X300Xiaomi 17Honor Magic8 Pro AirAverage 512 GB UFS 4.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-38%
-10%
-32%
-23%
-49%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)
4115.87
2056.87
-50%
3943.44
-4%
3567.89
-13%
3717 ?(1954 - 4366, n=33)
-10%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)
4076.12
1997.76
-51%
3784.97
-7%
339.02
-92%
3210 ?(339 - 4113, n=33)
-21%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)
578.74
332.61
-43%
487.69
-16%
377.83
-35%
407 ?(279 - 614, n=33)
-30%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)
721.05
654.09
-9%
643.31
-11%
821.54
14%
Max. Load
 41.7 °C38.9 °C35.5 °C 
 43.4 °C40.3 °C37.3 °C 
 46.5 °C40.1 °C37 °C 
Maximum: 46.5 °C
Average: 40.1 °C
37.1 °C37.4 °C41 °C
37.9 °C43.3 °C46.4 °C
38.4 °C40.5 °C50.8 °C
Maximum: 50.8 °C
Average: 41.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.3 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.5 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.8 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.5 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 17
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
72.8 % +57%
Vivo X300
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
58.9 % +27%
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
58.8 % +27%
OnePlus 15T
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
46.4 %
0102030405060708090100110120130140150Tooltip
OnePlus 15T Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø27.8 (18.7-40.6)
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø30.7 (28-38)
OnePlus 15T Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø103.8 (71.8-154.7)
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø105.2 (98.9-135.9)
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.2: Ø31.9 (26.8-36.8)
Xiaomi 17 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.1: Ø16 (13.9-18.6)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2023.14.72529.27.33130.55.34026.6125030.616.16333.214.680367.7100351812533.828.916037.541.820032.949.625027.354.131535.656.94003355.150032.45863028.367.880031.467.7100032.868.8125029.970.1160022.869.6200024.571.7250020.767.5315021.660400015.560.250009.271.263008.275.4800012.871.4100009.864125007.463.8160009.954.3SPL39.381.5N349.8median 27.3median 63.8Delta98.845.838.337.234.627.331.13536.245.644.727.62717.621.220.33917.150.419.756.716.95915.96117.462.916.962.117.364.721.667.320.570.518.469.418.569.417.571.614.575.714.670.614.366.416.475.419.578.321.280.421.872.419.670.319.277.316.768.230.886.21.466.7median 17.5median 69.41.65.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOnePlus 15TXiaomi 17
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
OnePlus 15T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (22.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(-) | highs are not linear (15% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi 17 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 147)
34h 17min
OnePlus 15T
7500 mAh
Vivo X300
5360 mAh
Xiaomi 17
7000 mAh
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
5500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S26
4300 mAh
Battery runtime
WiFi v1.3 (h)
34.3
19.6
-43%
30.9
-10%
20.3
-41%
17.7
-48%

Notebookcheck 对 OnePlus 15T 的总体印象

凭借 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 SoC 和 7,500 mAh 超大容量电池,OnePlus 15T 让用户在紧凑型手机中获得了真正的续航能力。

回顾 OnePlus 15T
回顾 OnePlus 15T

OnePlus 15T - 04/24/2026 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
90%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
57 / 69 → 82%
Weight
89%
Battery
97%
Display
90%
Games Performance
38 / 55 → 69%
Application Performance
91 / 85 → 100%
AI Performance
37%
Temperature
86%
Noise
100%
Audio
63 / 90 → 70%
Camera
80%
Average
69%
86%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
40%
Packaging
85%
Power Use
95%
Repairability
35%
Software Updates
63.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 53.1%

潜在竞争对手比较

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
86%
OnePlus 15T
OnePlus 15T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
List Price: 600€194 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.32"
2640x1216
460 PPI
OLED
2.
88%
Vivo X300
Vivo X300
MediaTek Dimensity 9500 ⎘
Arm Mali G1- Ultra MC12 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
List Price: 1049€190 g256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.31"
2640x1216
461 PPI
AMOLED
3.
89.2%
Xiaomi 17
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
List Price: 650€191 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.30"
2656x1220
464 PPI
LTPO AMOLED
4.
88.3%
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
MediaTek Dimensity 9500 ⎘
Arm Mali G1- Ultra MC12 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $13.80
ShouBao Compatible with Hono...
2. $10.79
Ibywind for Honor Magic8 Pro...
3. $14.98
Puccy Privacy Screen Protect...
List Price: 800€
155 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.31"
2640x1216
461 PPI
OLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > OnePlus 15T 评测:难以置信的电池续航能力让紧凑型智能手机的竞争者黯然失色
Marcus Herbrich, 2026-04-29 (Update: 2026-04-29)