Notebookcheck Logo

Oppo Find N3 翻盖智能手机评测--配备三摄像头的可折叠手机

绕道而行 OPPO 想在可折叠手机领域分一杯羹。Find N3 Flip 依靠大容量电池和三摄像头配置，与三星和摩托罗拉等老牌竞争对手一较高下。这足以夺得 Flip 的桂冠吗？我们将揭示可折叠手机的所有优缺点。
5G Android Foldable Smartphone Touchscreen

目前，市场上可折叠智能手机的数量仍然有限。对于较小的设备来说尤其如此。 三星Galaxy Z Flip5和 摩托罗拉 Razr 40 - 可选 Ultra - 都是顶级产品。华为也有一款不错的折叠智能手机 P50 Pocket，但在没有谷歌服务的情况下，其竞争力有限。

现在，Oppo 也想分一杯羹，并在市场上推出了 Find N3 Flip。这款手机目前尚未在德国正式销售。不过，随着 Oppo 和诺基亚达成协议，这种情况很快就会改变。

Oppo 将提供三种颜色的 Find N3 Flip：奶油金、朦胧粉和光滑黑。该设备的基本版本配备 12 GB 内存和 256 GB 存储空间。制造商还提供 512 GB 存储空间的版本。我们的测试机是奶油金色的小存储版本。据深圳贸易公司称，进口价为 1,147 欧元。

Oppo Find N3 Flip (Find N Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 8 x 1.8 - 3.1 GHz, Cortex-X3 / A715 / A510
Graphics adapter
ARM Immortalis-G715 MP11, Core: 981 MHz
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
6.80 inch 21:9, 2520 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, Capacitive, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 221.2 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Geomagnetic sensor, Proximity sensor, In-display optical sensor, Acceleration sensor, Gravity sensor, Gyroscope, OTG
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.3, GSM (850/900/1800/1900MHz), WCDMA (Bands 1/2/4/5/6/8/19), LTE FDD (Bands 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/17/18/19/20/26/28/66), LTE TDD (Bands 38/39/40/41(2496-2690MHz)), 5G NR (Bands n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n12/n20/n28/n38/n40/n41/n66/n77/n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.8 x 166.4 x 75.8
Battery
4300 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8; FOV 84°) + 32MP (2x optical zoom, f/2.0, 47mm, FOV 49°) + 48MP (f/2.2, 14mm, FOV 114°)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.4, 21mm, 0.8µm, FOV 90°)
Additional features
Keyboard: OnScreen, SIM Ejector Tool, Protective Case, 67W-Charger, USB-Cable, ColorOS 13.2, 12 Months Warranty, GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1, E5a, E5b), BeiDou (B1, B1C, B2a), SBAS; DRM Widevine L1; Camera2 API Level 3 , fanless
Weight
201 g, Power Supply: 127 g
Price
1147 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86.3 %
02/2024
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11		201 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"2520x1080
86.9 %
08/2023
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740		187 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.70"2640x1080
86.1 %
03/2022
Huawei P50 Pocket
SD 888 4G, Adreno 660		190 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.90"2790x1188
87 %
06/2023
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730		188.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.90"2640x1080

与三星和摩托罗拉一样，Oppo 也为 N3 Flip 配备了两块屏幕。3.26 英寸的外部显示屏由康宁大猩猩玻璃 Victus 保护。旁边是三摄像头，突出机身约两毫米。

正面和背面也是玻璃材质，但制造商没有提供更多信息。6.8 英寸内部显示屏由 Schott UTG 保护。右侧安装了音量摇杆和集成指纹识别器的电源按钮。在左侧，Oppo Find N3 Flip 有一个用于通知设置的滑块。所有按键都有很好的受力点，按起来不会有弹力。

做工质量令人满意。在测试期间，我们没有在设备上发现任何划痕或其他磨损。铰链两端位置之间有一些间隙。不过，它在两端位置的安装还是安全稳定的。Oppo Find N3 Flip 重 201 克。

当设备折叠后放在桌面上时，如果桌面不是绝对平整，它很容易滑落。玻璃机背几乎没有提供任何抓握力。

尺寸比较

❌
170.8 mm 74 mm 7 mm 188.5 g170 mm 75.5 mm 7.2 mm 190 g166.4 mm 75.8 mm 7.8 mm 201 g165.1 mm 71.9 mm 6.9 mm 187 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

功能 - Find N3 Flip 只能处理 USB 2.0

奥普 Find N3 Flip 采用联发科 Dimensity 9200 作为 SoC。它还拥有 12 GB 内存和 256 GB 存储空间。内存不可扩展。Find N3 Flip 支持双卡双待，可使用两张实体 SIM 卡和一张 eSIM 卡。

遗憾的是，USB 端口仅提供 USB 2.0 作为传输标准。不过，数据传输可以使用 exFAT 和 NTFS。结合三星 980 Pro 固态硬盘，我们测得的传输速度为 22.94 MB/s。

Find N3 Flip 没有获得 IP 认证。不过，SIM 卡托盘有一个橡胶密封圈，至少可以防止溅水。

左： 通知滑块
左： 通知滑块
右侧音量摇杆、带指纹识别器的电源按钮
右侧音量摇杆、带指纹识别器的电源按钮
顶部：麦克风、扬声器
顶部：麦克风、扬声器
底部扬声器、USB、麦克风、SIM 卡插槽
底部扬声器、USB、麦克风、SIM 卡插槽

软件 - Oppo 目前只有英文版

奥普为 Find N3 Flip 提供了Android 13 和自己的 UI ColorOS 13.2。测试时的安全补丁是从 2024 年 1 月开始的。我们的测试设备是进口的，在德国没有正式发售。在设置过程中，系统语言无法选择德语，但可以选择英语。不过，一些预装的应用程序和小工具提供了普通话文本。

预装的大量应用程序都是 ex-works，但可以轻松卸载。不过，没有安装 Google 应用程序。即使是 Play Store 也必须先安装，但这可以通过 APK 轻松完成。首次启动后，会占用 34.8 GB 的存储空间。Oppo 已经宣布，从 2023 年开始，目前的旗舰产品将获得四年的系统更新和五年的安全更新。Find N3 Flip 也应该属于这一规定的范围。Android 14 的更新正好赶上测试结束。

智能手机的所有功能都无法通过外部显示屏使用。时间、日期、充电状态、天气和步数计数器都在这里显示。此外，还可以快速访问相机。媒体播放时，媒体控制也会显示在显示屏上。通知也会显示在显示屏上。

选定的应用程序也可以显示在外部显示屏上。选择和顺序可在设置中自定义。除了自己的应用程序外，YouTube 或 Google 地图等其他程序也可以在外侧显示屏上启动。键盘也会显示出来，可以用来输入信息，但比较累赘。

该外形的一大优势是拍照功能。由于采用了外置显示屏，自拍时可以使用所有三个镜头。此外，在拍照时还可以同时启动两个显示屏。如果智能手机只打开一半，它本身就可以充当三脚架，软件会相应地调整显示屏。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - Find N3 Flip 配备 WiFi 7？

一些零售商网站将 Wi-Fi 接收频率称为 WiFi 7，但 Oppo 仅将 2.4 和 5 GHz 列为频段。我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG AXE11000 无法与 Oppo Find N3 Flip 建立 6 GHz 连接。不过，5 GHz 范围内的传输速率不错，与对比设备相当。

Oppo Find N3 Flip 还支持各种移动频率，包括 5G。在测试中，接收效果并不突出。双卡双待可通过两张实体 nano-SIM 卡和 eSIM 卡使用。

Networking
Oppo Find N3 Flip
iperf3 receive AXE11000
920 (min: 904) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
850 (min: 594) MBit/s ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
942 (min: 480) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
906 (min: 454) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1768 (min: 918) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1576 (min: 1208) MBit/s ∼100%
Huawei P50 Pocket
iperf3 receive AXE11000
766 (min: 735) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
824 (min: 425) MBit/s ∼91%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1343 (min: 863) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
835 (min: 676) MBit/s ∼53%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
646 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
685 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1536 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1364 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼87%
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1738 (918-1821)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1576 (1208-1634)
Oppo Find N3 Flip MediaTek Dimensity 9200, ARM Immortalis-G715 MP11; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø919 (904-931)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø925 (480-957)
Oppo Find N3 Flip MediaTek Dimensity 9200, ARM Immortalis-G715 MP11; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø850 (594-984)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø891 (454-945)
GNSS 室外测试
GNSS 室外测试
GNSS 室内测试
GNSS 室内测试

Oppo Find N3 Flip 支持包括 SBAS 在内的所有常见卫星系统，并提供双系统。卫星连接的建立需要一些时间，但随后会非常稳定和准确。

我们将 OPPO 智能手机与 Garmin Venu 2 智能手表一起骑车。相比之下，智能手表绘制的路线明显比 Find N3 Flip 准确得多。不过，以谷歌地图为例，使用智能手机进行导航也没有任何问题。

全球导航卫星系统测试：环湖航行
全球导航卫星系统测试：环湖航行
全球导航卫星系统测试：转折点
全球导航卫星系统测试：转折点
全球导航卫星系统测试：总结
全球导航卫星系统测试：总结

手机功能和语音质量 - 配备漫游助手的 Oppo 智能手机

Oppo 依靠自己的手机应用程序。除了访问联系人和通话列表外，它还提供通话分钟数和数据使用量列表。甚至还可以通过拨号器提供合同信息。Find N3 Flip 还有一个漫游助手。它能识别您何时在国外，并建议合适的资费。

手机质量不错。即使在免提模式下，Find N3 Flip 的声音也足够响亮。用户的声音也同样清晰。不过，背景噪音很难被过滤掉。

摄像头 - Find N3 Flip 配备三重设置

用 Find N3 Flip 的主摄像头自拍
用 Find N3 Flip 的主摄像头自拍
用 Find N3 Flip 的自拍摄像头自拍
用 Find N3 Flip 的自拍摄像头自拍

凭借 Find N3 Flip，Oppo 在摄像头方面取得了新突破。它是首款配备三摄像头的翻盖智能手机。主摄像头最大分辨率为 5000 万像素，具有 OIS 功能。此外还有一个 3200 万像素超广角镜头和一个 4800 万像素变焦镜头。OPPO 还与哈苏合作。

图像质量令人印象深刻。图像清晰，细节丰富，色彩平衡逼真。Find N3 Flip 的摄像头在拍摄变焦镜头时也令人印象深刻。只有在光线不足或夜景拍摄时，该系统才会达到极限。虽然图像可用且几乎没有噪点，但许多区域在黑暗中会丢失。

前置摄像头拍摄的图像也还可以。不过，由于是户外显示屏，建议使用主摄像头，因为它能拍出更好的照片。相机软件还提供专业模式。ISO、快门、白平衡和对焦均可手动设置。Find N3 Flip 还可以将图像保存为 RAW 和 RAW+格式。

所有镜头均可拍摄 30 帧/秒的 4K 视频。录像的稳定性很好，音质也很不错。不过，自动对焦的速度可以再快一些。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide-angle5x ZoomLow Light
ColorChecker
7.6 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
4 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
0.7 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
4 ∆E
0.8 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Find N3 Flip: 5.08 ∆E min: 0.66 - max: 10.53 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.4 ∆E
51.8 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
44.4 ∆E
61.2 ∆E
51.1 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
38.9 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
62.9 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
46.9 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
71.8 ∆E
41.6 ∆E
41.8 ∆E
76.3 ∆E
68.7 ∆E
51.6 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Find N3 Flip: 44.84 ∆E min: 14.02 - max: 76.26 ∆E

配件和保修 - OPPO 无官方支持

Oppo Find N3 Flip 包装在一个大盒子里，打开后会自动打开--做得很好。制造商随智能手机附送了一个 67 瓦的电源适配器（USB-A 转 USB-C）。不过，我们使用的是 Tap-A 插头。官方称，尽管有强大的电源适配器，Find N3 Flip 只能以 44 瓦的功率充电。

OPPO 甚至提供了一个由两部分组成的保护套。不过，这是用胶条固定的，以便更好地抓握。由于 Oppo Find N3 Flip 并未在德国正式发售，因此官方没有说明保修事宜。保修由零售商提供。

输入设备和操作 - Find N3 Flip 的外部显示屏可定制性不强

我们将 Oppo Find N3 Flip 的预装键盘更换为 Google 的 GBoard，因为原键盘不支持德语作为输入语言和相应的布局。有了谷歌键盘，在主显示屏上输入时不会出现任何问题或错误。但是，外接显示器上的键盘无法自定义。

主显示屏的表面与传统智能手机不同。打字时会比较柔和，滑动性能也稍差。显示屏还容易沾染指纹。虽然滚动时折痕明显，但并不令人讨厌。

Find N3 Flip 可以通过指纹或面部扫描解锁。指纹识别器集成在电源按钮上。虽然它能快速工作，但在测试中并不特别可靠。手指经常要放在上面好几次。我们更喜欢面部解锁功能，因为它的工作速度非常快，而且非常可靠。如果需要，可以直接跳过锁屏。使用摄像头解锁时，两个摄像头在两种状态下都能正常工作。

显示屏 - Find N3 翻转屏明亮美观

子像素结构，主显示屏
子像素结构，主显示屏
子像素结构，封面显示
子像素结构，封面显示

Oppo Find N3 Flip 装有两个显示屏。外盖显示屏的对角线为 3.26 英寸。它支持 30 到 60 Hz 的刷新率。内部显示屏的尺寸为 6.8 英寸，由于支持 LTPO，可以在 1 到 120 Hz 之间调节刷新率。

此外，Find N3 Flip 的主显示屏亮度不错，平均值为 931.9 cd/m²。因此，Find N3 Flip 达到了该级别的最高值，超过了SamsungGalaxy Z Flip5 和Motorola Razr 40 Ultra 。在 APL18 测量中，Find N3 Flip 甚至达到了 1077 尼特。室外显示屏在测试中最高达到 720 cd/m²。

在测量过程中，我们注意到屏幕闪烁。在最大亮度下，频率从 120 Hz 到 359 Hz 不等。不过，Oppo 还提供了 1440 Hz 的特殊 PWM 调光模式。我们在测量中也达到了这一数值。

919
cd/m²		928
cd/m²		953
cd/m²
914
cd/m²		922
cd/m²		951
cd/m²
919
cd/m²		928
cd/m²		953
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 953 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 931.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.26 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 922 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 0.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
97.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
Oppo Find N3 Flip
AMOLED, 2520x1080, 6.80		Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Dynamic AMOLED, 2640x1080, 6.70		Huawei P50 Pocket
Foldable OLED, 2790x1188, 6.90		Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
P-OLED, 2640x1080, 6.90
Screen
-86%
-40%
-194%
Brightness middle
922
836
-9%
780
-15%
849
-8%
Brightness
932
848
-9%
768
-18%
830
-11%
Brightness Distribution
96
97
1%
96
0%
96
0%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.7
2.6
-271%
1.1
-57%
3.02
-331%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.8
4.5
-150%
3.1
-72%
7.61
-323%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
0.9
1.6
-78%
1.6
-78%
5.3
-489%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.22 99%
2.23 99%
2.198 100%
CCT
6569 99%
6319 103%
6483 100%
6338 103%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列

由于采用了 AMOLED 技术，Oppo Find N3 Flip 的黑屏效果堪称完美。不过，面板的其他设置也令人印象深刻。色彩偏差非常轻微，大多在难以察觉的范围内。

该设备在饱和度方面也令人印象深刻。根据 Calman 2D 测量，sRGB 色彩空间的覆盖率为 97.3%。

色彩保真度（色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩保真度（色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩饱和度（色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩饱和度（色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.738 ms rise
↘ 0.695 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.159 ms rise
↘ 0.974 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Oppo Find N3 Flip 的两块显示屏在户外使用都很方便。尤其是内屏非常明亮，内容始终清晰易读。

Oppo Find N3 Flip 的可视角度达到了很好的水平。即使从锐利的角度观察，也能轻松识别内容。即使从侧面看，折痕也几乎看不出来。

性能 - OPPO 智能手机采用强大的联发科技术

我们对 Find N3 Flip 进行了各种基准测试。结果喜忧参半。例如，在 Geekbench 5 和 6 测试中，Find N3 Flip 的性能与三星 Z Flip5 不相上下。 三星Galaxy Z Flip5的 骁龙 8 代 2Galaxy和 OPPO 的 联发科 Dimensity 9200明显更胜一筹。在 PC Mark Work 3.0 中，Find N3 Flip 甚至落后于 华为 P50 Poket的 骁龙 888.

然而，在安兔兔 V9 或 UL Procyon AI Inference forAndroid 中，情况却完全不同--Find N3 Flip 在这两项测试中均获得第一名。在日常使用中，这款智能手机的高速系统给人留下了深刻印象。应用程序打开迅速，UI 运行流畅。

快速的内置内存也为良好的整体性能做出了贡献。Oppo 依靠 UFS 4.0 内存，我们在测试中获得了很高的传输速率。

Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.2 | Antutu v9 | PCMark for Android | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1542 Points +39%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1294 Points +17%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200
  (1107 - 1384, n=2)
1246 Points +13%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1107 Points
Huawei P50 Pocket
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 12288
1099 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=220, last 2 years)
911 Points -18%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
4955 Points +42%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
3921 Points +12%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200
  (3494 - 4232, n=2)
3863 Points +11%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
3494 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=220, last 2 years)
2988 Points -14%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 12288
2944 Points -16%
Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
2040 Points +40%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200
  (1460 - 1970, n=2)
1715 Points +17%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1460 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 2930, n=105, last 2 years)
1390 Points -5%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
5228 Points +38%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200
  (3799 - 5386, n=2)
4593 Points +21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 7408, n=105, last 2 years)
3840 Points +1%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
3799 Points
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1212168 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200
  (1175789 - 1212168, n=2)
1193979 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1086936 Points -10%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
950618 Points -22%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 12288
784775 Points -35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)
738503 Points -39%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
17002 Points +71%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
15101 Points +52%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 12288
11897 Points +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=215, last 2 years)
11771 Points +19%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
9920 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200
  (9765 - 9920, n=2)
9843 Points -1%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
8541 Points +14%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
7488 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200
  (6755 - 7488, n=2)
7122 Points -5%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
6349 Points -15%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 12288
6265 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)
5759 Points -23%
System
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
14188 Points +42%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 12288
10283 Points +3%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
10052 Points +1%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
9997 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200
  (9767 - 9997, n=2)
9882 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)
9672 Points -3%
Memory
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
8629 Points +16%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200
  (7411 - 9245, n=2)
8328 Points +12%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
7411 Points
Huawei P50 Pocket
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 12288
6493 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)
6267 Points -15%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
5461 Points -26%
Graphics
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200
  (26484 - 27698, n=2)
27091 Points +2%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
26484 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
21505 Points -19%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
19247 Points -27%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 12288
14837 Points -44%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)
14220 Points -46%
Web
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
2021 Points +26%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1602 Points
Huawei P50 Pocket
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G, Adreno 660, 12288
1554 Points -3%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1538 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)
1495 Points -7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200
  (843 - 1602, n=2)
1223 Points -24%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200
  (40276 - 44483, n=2)
42380 Points +5%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
40276 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=150, last 2 years)
21814 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
16235 Points -60%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
14826 Points -63%

奥普依靠 Find N3 Flip 配备的 Immortalis-G715 MP11图形处理器。这使这款智能手机处于有利位置，与 三星Galaxy Z Flip5(Adreno 740)和 摩托罗拉 Razr 40 Ultra(Adreno 730).

Find N3 Flip 功能强大，足以流畅地以高分辨率玩当前的游戏。PUBG Mobile》可以最高 HDR 分辨率和超高刷新率进行游戏。

Oppo Find N3 Flip 在浏览器基准测试中表现出色。Edge 浏览器的数值比 Chrome 浏览器高出许多倍，而 Chrome 浏览器的数值则是灾难性的。不过，这在日常使用中并不明显。页面加载迅速，滚动流畅。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3496 Points +1%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3454 Points
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1947 Points -44%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1232 Points -64%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3116 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3090 Points -1%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2001 Points -36%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1253 Points -60%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12831 Points
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10853 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
9805 Points -24%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4542 Points -65%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8167 Points
Huawei P50 Pocket
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4677 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5825 Points
Huawei P50 Pocket
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4539 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20215 Points
Huawei P50 Pocket
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9323 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13051 Points
Huawei P50 Pocket
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7544 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61 fps +2%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
496 fps +62%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
344 fps +12%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
306 fps
Huawei P50 Pocket
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
202 fps -34%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps +92%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
Huawei P50 Pocket
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps -5%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
276 fps +77%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
174 fps +12%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
156 fps
Huawei P50 Pocket
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
107 fps -31%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
87 fps +45%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
Huawei P50 Pocket
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47 fps -22%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
212 fps +89%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
112 fps
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
105 fps -6%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61 fps -46%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
72 fps +44%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps +18%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50 fps
Huawei P50 Pocket
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps -32%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps +22%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps +16%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58 fps
Huawei P50 Pocket
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps -24%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88 fps +49%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59 fps
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps -2%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
25 fps -58%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps +24%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps +5%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
42 fps
Huawei P50 Pocket
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps -52%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88 fps +47%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 fps +27%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
Huawei P50 Pocket
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps -45%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
101 fps
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
92 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
84 fps -17%
Huawei P50 Pocket
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
50 fps -50%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
32 fps +60%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps 0%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20 fps
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G (Chrome 115)
163.005 Points +30%
Oppo Find N3 Flip (Edge 121)
125 Points
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)
106.1 Points -15%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (Chrome 114)
100.523 Points -20%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200 (67.6 - 125, n=2)
96.3 Points -23%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (Chome 114)
125 runs/min +21%
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)
107.1 runs/min +4%
Oppo Find N3 Flip (Edge 121)
103 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200 (60.2 - 103, n=2)
81.6 runs/min -21%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G (Chrome 115)
180 Points +34%
Oppo Find N3 Flip (Edge 121)
134 Points
Oppo Find N3 Flip (Chrome 121)
22 Points -84%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=160, last 2 years)
100.2 Points -25%
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (Chrome 114)
98 Points -27%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200 (22 - 134, n=3)
74 Points -45%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
55459 Points +21%
Oppo Find N3 Flip (Edge 121)
45823 Points
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (Chrome 114)
39146 Points -15%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200 (21648 - 45823, n=2)
33736 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=214, last 2 years)
33357 Points -27%
Huawei P50 Pocket (Huawei Browser 11.1)
21748 Points -53%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Huawei P50 Pocket (Huawei Browser 11.1)
1938 ms * -111%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)
1595 ms * -74%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200 (918 - 1848, n=2)
1383 ms * -51%
Oppo Find N3 Flip (Edge 121)
917.8 ms *
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (Chrome 114)
909.8 ms * +1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
779.8 ms * +15%

* ... smaller is better

Oppo Find N3 FlipSamsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5GHuawei P50 PocketMotorola Razr 40 UltraAverage 256 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-24%
-52%
-33%
-14%
-53%
Sequential Read 256KB
3794
3412.35
-10%
1839
-52%
1816.8
-52%
3558 ?(3249 - 4384, n=19)
-6%
1506 ?(226 - 4512, n=219, last 2 years)
-60%
Sequential Write 256KB
2965
2289.61
-23%
575
-81%
1352.6
-54%
2443 ?(1014 - 3346, n=19)
-18%
1115 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=219, last 2 years)
-62%
Random Read 4KB
411
444.6
8%
263.5
-36%
362
-12%
414 ?(368 - 460, n=19)
1%
247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=219, last 2 years)
-40%
Random Write 4KB
558
161.87
-71%
342.1
-39%
472.3
-15%
367 ?(152.9 - 595, n=19)
-34%
271 ?(13 - 709, n=219, last 2 years)
-51%

Games FPS

No graph data

排放 - 发现 N3 Flip 的节流时间晚于三星

温度 - Find N3 Flip 在负载情况下会发热

在日常使用中，Oppo Find N3 Flip 仍然保持着令人愉悦的低温。在无负载的情况下，我们测得的平均温度仅为 26.5 摄氏度。当智能手机受到压力时，例如游戏或基准测试等要求较高的程序，设备会明显发热，尤其是摄像头区域。

在燃烧基准测试中，我们测得背面最高温度为 41.9 摄氏度。不过，这还不值得担心，设备的握持和操作都没有任何问题。

Max. Load
 39.7 °C39.9 °C28.5 °C 
 41.9 °C34.6 °C29.2 °C 
 42 °C40.7 °C30.7 °C 
Maximum: 42 °C
Average: 36.4 °C
27.7 °C36.1 °C36.1 °C
27.5 °C33.3 °C39.7 °C
27 °C35.8 °C40 °C
Maximum: 40 °C
Average: 33.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  25.3 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58.9 %
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
38.3 % -35%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50.3 %
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
34.8 % -31%
0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Oppo Find N3 Flip Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø13.3 (9.44-18.8)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø9.61 (7.69-22.1)
Oppo Find N3 Flip Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø46.5 (37.4-63.5)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 1.1.0.2: Ø33.8 (28.3-73.9)
Oppo Find N3 Flip Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø10.2 (9.14-19.8)
Oppo Find N3 Flip Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø11.1 (9.19-19.9)

扬声器 - Oppo 可折叠手机的立体声音效

尽管外形特殊，Oppo 还是设法安装了立体声扬声器。上部扬声器与听筒融为一体。不过，关闭时声音也会通过顶部的开口向外辐射。

这款智能手机的音量高达 91.6 分贝，但背面几乎没有振动。声音重现清晰，但几乎没有低音或低频。高音略微偏高。不过，总的来说，Find N3 Flip 的音质完全没有问题。

这款 OPPO 智能手机没有插孔连接。不过，在测试过程中，我们可以顺利连接蓝牙耳机。Find N3 Flip 支持以下编解码器：SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive、aptX TWS+、LDAC 和 LHDC。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2028.640.32525.937.43123.437.44027.336.75036.237.66325.436.68016.638.610016.939.912514.741.716013.149.620015.147.925014.351.631511.655.54001058.65009.168.263011.169.48009.171.8100011.875.512501576.4160011.375.120001276250012.377.9315012.782.1400012.684.2500013.183.4630013.483.5800013.577.11000013.569.61250013.663.71600013.660.3SPL24.791.6N0.686.3median 13.1median 71.8Delta1.310.430.936.222.328.623.227.325.43031.132.8202917.830.117.53117.338.31551.715.153.616.356.213.561.513.963.913.46813.368.211.7711473.31475.213.377.41378.713.580.914.381.313.480.314.778.413.676.214.173.8147014.268.113.864.625.889.60.777.1median 14median 710.79.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOppo Find N3 FlipSamsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oppo Find N3 Flip audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - Find N3 Flip 配备大容量电池

功耗 - Oppo 比三星更耗电

Oppo Find N3 Flip 的能耗尚可。与采用相同 SoC 的其他智能手机相比，Oppo 对最大能耗的调整非常到位。不过，三星Galaxy Z Flip5 在各方面都明显更经济。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.08 / 0.31 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.77 / 1.68 / 1.72 Watt
Load midlight 8.45 / 11.05 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Oppo Find N3 Flip
4300 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
3700 mAh		Huawei P50 Pocket
4000 mAh		Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
3800 mAh		Average MediaTek Dimensity 9200
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
42%
-4%
17%
0%
12%
Idle Minimum *
0.77
0.44
43%
1.33
-73%
0.9
-17%
0.835 ?(0.77 - 0.9, n=2)
-8%
0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years)
-16%
Idle Average *
1.68
0.69
59%
1.77
-5%
1.1
35%
2 ?(1.68 - 2.32, n=2)
-19%
1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years)
14%
Idle Maximum *
1.72
0.91
47%
1.89
-10%
1.3
24%
2.06 ?(1.72 - 2.39, n=2)
-20%
1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years)
5%
Load Average *
8.45
6.61
22%
4.25
50%
5.5
35%
6.05 ?(3.64 - 8.45, n=2)
28%
5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years)
34%
Load Maximum *
11.05
6.72
39%
9.19
17%
10.3
7%
8.79 ?(6.53 - 11.1, n=2)
20%
8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years)
25%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011121314Tooltip
Oppo Find N3 Flip MediaTek Dimensity 9200; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.4 (0.791-7.68)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.24 (0.85-14.1)
Oppo Find N3 Flip MediaTek Dimensity 9200; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.938 (0.912-1.035)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.68 (0.604-1.264)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
Oppo Find N3 Flip MediaTek Dimensity 9200; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.96 (4.31-5.42)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.81 (6.05-9.54)
Oppo Find N3 Flip MediaTek Dimensity 9200; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.938 (0.912-1.035)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.68 (0.604-1.264)

电池续航时间 - Find N3 Flip 的电池续航时间超过 14 小时

虽然三星智能手机的能耗要低得多，但 Oppo Find N3 Flip 的电池续航时间在对比设备中却是最长的。这是因为制造商采用了容量更大的 4300 毫安时电池。

在实际的 WiFi 网上冲浪测试中，我们获得了超过 14 小时的续航时间。在日常使用中，我们可以轻松地使用这款智能手机一整天。如果积极使用覆盖式显示屏，也可以使用两天。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
14h 17min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Oppo Find N3 Flip
4300 mAh
857 min
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
3700 mAh
647 min
Huawei P50 Pocket
4000 mAh
482 min
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
3800 mAh
669 min

Pros

+ 明亮的显示屏
+ 电池寿命长
+ 良好的照相性能

Cons

- 仅限 USB 2.0
- 目前没有官方支持

结论 - Oppo Find N3 Flip 的强劲性能

回顾：Oppo Find N3 Flip。测试设备由 TradingShenzhen 提供。
回顾：Oppo Find N3 Flip。测试设备由 TradingShenzhen 提供。

奥普推出了功能强大的可折叠手机 Find N3 Flip。与三星Galaxy Z Flip5 和摩托罗拉 Razr 40 Ultra 一样，它配备了大尺寸的盖板显示屏，折叠后也能在一定程度上进行操作。不过，与竞争对手相比，它多了一个摄像头。Find N3 Flip 的照片效果非常出色--由于外形因素，几乎没有任何限制。

OPPO 在电池方面也做到了这一点。它的电池容量明显大于三星和摩托罗拉。Find N3 Flip 可以轻松度过一天。显示屏也给人留下了深刻印象--它漂亮、明亮，而且校准完美。当然，折痕也很明显，但在日常使用中很少能看到。

在性能方面，我们也没什么可抱怨的。系统运行非常流畅，内存高达 12 GB，UFS 内存不仅容量大，而且速度非常快。

出色的摄像头、明亮的显示屏和快速的处理器。Oppo Find N3 Flip 做到了很多。

Oppo 的更新承诺也非常令人期待。在测试中，Android 14 的更新已经到达，安全补丁也是最新的。不过，软件是测试设备唯一的缺点。该设备目前只能使用英语，但有些区域只能显示字符。不过，谷歌应用程序可以顺利安装，谷歌服务也可以顺利使用。该设备还有望很快在德国正式上市。

三星Galaxy Z Flip5 性能更强，软件支持时间也更长。如果外接显示屏可以更小一些，摩托罗拉 Razr 40 在这种外形下性价比也是很高的。

价格和供应情况

在美国，Find N3 Flip 并非由制造商正式销售，但用户可以通过亚马逊订购这款 OPPO 手机。

Oppo Find N3 Flip - 02/13/2024 v7
Benedikt Winkel

Chassis
86%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
55 / 70 → 78%
Weight
88%
Battery
90%
Display
94%
Games Performance
52 / 64 → 81%
Application Performance
94 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
89%
Noise
100%
Audio
78 / 90 → 86%
Camera
73%
Average
75%
86%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Oppo Find N3 翻盖智能手机评测--配备三摄像头的可折叠手机
Benedikt Winkel, 2024-02-21 (Update: 2024-02-21)