比Apple iPad Mini 更便宜、更快、更现代--小米 Pad Mini 平板电脑评测

Name: Xiaomi Pad Mini
Brand: Xiaomi

结构紧凑、重量轻、功能强大，令人印象深刻。

小巧的 8.8 英寸小米 Pad Mini 可提供通常只有高端智能手机才具备的性能和功能。它提供高达 512 GB 的存储空间，其 Dimensity 9400+ 芯片在某些情况下甚至可以超越骁龙 8 代 3。这款平板电脑还配备了令人惊叹的 3K 显示屏，刷新率高达 165 Hz，尽管体积小巧，但电池续航时间却非常出色。
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 10/27/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android Tablet Touchscreen Wi-Fi 7

判决

小米 Pad Mini 是一款小巧、轻便、高品质的平板电脑，8.8 英寸的小巧金属外壳中装入了大量存储空间。它拥有明亮的 165 Hz 面板、快如闪电的 Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ 处理器和两个 USB-C 端口，与许多竞争对手相比，它能提供更多的功能。尤其是其主要竞争对手之一的Apple iPad Mini 7，在电池续航时间方面明显不如小米 Pad Mini。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Test device courtesy of Xiaomi

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

遗憾的是，这款小型小米平板电脑没有移动版，也没有 GPS 模块。我们希望小米 Pad Mini 能正式登陆欧洲，因为作为进口版本，它还有两个缺点：更新周期短于欧盟标准；根据进口商的不同，可能没有 24 个月的保修期。

Pros

+ 轻巧、坚固、制作精良

+ 功能强大，支持 2x USB-C

+ 电池寿命长

+ 快速 SoC

+ 明亮的 165 Hz 屏幕

+ 3K 分辨率

+ 高达 512 GB 的存储空间

Cons

- 有关可用性的问题

- 软件更新仅持续到 2028 年

- 无 OLED 屏幕

- 无 GPS 模块

- 无 4G/5G 选项

价格和供应情况

在的新闻稿中关于 Pad Mini 的上市时间，小米只提到了 "部分市场"。至于是否包括欧盟市场，还有待观察。

对于 8/256 GB 的入门级版本，小米的零售价为 429 美元，约合 369 欧元。例如，12/512GB 的大存储版本在Aliexpress 上的售价约为 500 欧元（约合 580 美元）。在邮购公司Otto的价格约为 560 欧元。

判决
规格
外壳 - 采用轻质金属一体成型机身的小米 Pad Mini
功能 - 配备 2x USB-C 接口的小米 Pad Mini
软件 -Android 15，更新至 2028 年
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 WiFi 7，但没有移动通信和全球定位系统
照相机 - 日光下的实用快照
附件和保修 - 带问号的交货范围
输入设备和操作 - 165 Hz 显示屏和笔支持
显示屏 - 小米 Pad Mini，3K 分辨率，支持 HDR
性能 - 配备高端 SoC 的小米 Pad Mini
排放 - 多为酷平板电脑，扬声器性能良好
电池寿命 - 持久耐用，可在 1 小时内完成充电
Notebookcheck 总体评分
可比较的替代品

通过小米 Pad Mini，小米推出了全球版本的红米 K Pad.后者在我们的测试中表现出色，其低廉的价格、高端的性能和超长的电池续航时间给人留下了深刻印象。

因此，小米 Pad Mini 有能力获得较高的评价，尤其是在规格保持不变的情况下。价格也保持在相当低的水平。

规格

Xiaomi Pad Mini

Processor

Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ 8 x - 3.7 GHz, Cortex-X925, X4, A720

Graphics adapter

ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12

Memory

12 GB

, LPDDR5X

Display

8.80 inch 16:10, 3008 x 1880 pixel 403 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, native pen support, TFT-LCD, Touch sampling rate up to 372 Hz, instant touch sampling up to 1080 Hz, 600 nits typical brightness, 700 nits HBM, glossy: yes, HDR, 165 Hz

Storage

512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB

, 492 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Hall sensor, Magnetic sensor, Proximity sensor, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3, Wi-Fi Direct, Miracast, USB-OTG

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 6.46 x 205.13 x 132.03

Battery

7500 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 67W max. charging speed, 18W wired reverse charging, PD 3.0/2.0

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 15

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix (Omnivision OV13B, f/2.2, 1/3.06", 1.12μm pixel size, PDAF), video recording up to 4K@30fps
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.28, 1/4", 1.12μm pixel size), video recording up to 1080p@30fps

Additional features

Speakers: stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos, Keyboard: virtual, USB-C cable (USB 2.0), quick start guide, warrany card, HyperOS 2.0, 12 Months Warranty, unibody metal design; HDR support: HDR10, HDR10+, HLG, Dolby Vision; no GPS; Bluetooth codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LDAC, LDHC V1-V5; USB-C 3.2 Gen.1 port speed: 250 MB/s with Samsung Portable SSD T7; update policy: 2 OS version upgrades, 3 years of security updates til 2028-09, fanless

Weight

326 g

Price

500 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

外壳 - 采用轻质金属一体成型机身的小米 Pad Mini

8.8 英寸的小米 Pad Mini 仅重 326 克，感觉非常轻巧。它看起来也比 Apple iPad Mini 7由于它的显示屏边缘很窄，四边大约只有 7 毫米。除了我们的灰色测试机，小米还提供紫色的 Pad Mini。

Pad Mini 采用了坚固耐用、做工精良的金属一体成型外壳，表面经过磨砂处理，几乎不会留下任何指纹。这款平板电脑没有 IP 防护等级，小米也没有提供显示屏玻璃防护等级的任何信息。

尺寸比较

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra Xiaomi Pad Mini Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) DIN A5 ❌

功能 - 配备 2x USB-C 接口的小米 Pad Mini

这款配置精良的小米平板电脑有两个 USB-C 端口，可用于多种用途。例如，外接耳机可以连接到一个端口，而游戏控制器则可以连接到第二个 USB 端口。

底部的 USB-C 端口支持 USB 3.2 Gen.1，除了快速数据传输外，还支持向显示器输出图像。第二个 USB-C 端口位于平板电脑的右侧，运行速度为 USB 2.0。

WiFi Direct 和 Miracast 可用于无线数据传输。小米 Pad Mini 没有音频插孔和 microSD 插槽。

软件 -Android 15，更新至 2028 年

小米 Pad Mini 运行Android 15，配备小米 HyperOS 2.0 用户界面。根据小米信任中心，Pad Mini 的操作系统将升级至Android 17。此外，它还将获得为期 3 年的安全更新，直至 2028 年 9 月。后者将每三个月发布一次。在 10 月中旬进行测试时，该平板电脑运行的是 8 月份的Android 安全补丁，因此是最新的。

可持续性

小米 Pad Mini 采用无塑料包装。制造商没有提供任何有关平板电脑中可回收材料比例的信息。在其网站上，小米提供了以旧换新计划。以旧换新计划。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 WiFi 7，但没有移动通信和全球定位系统

小米 Pad Mini 支持 WiFi 7，但不支持 6 GHz 频段。使用我们的参考路由器--华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000，数据传输仍然快速稳定，最高可达 989 MBit/s。

有趣的是，中国版平板电脑红米 K Pad在这项测试中取得了更好的成绩，尽管规格完全相同。它在传输数据时与 Pad Mini 大致相当，但在接收测试中却达到了 1657 MBit/s。

Pad Mini 没有 GPS 模块。小米也没有提供移动版平板电脑。

Networking
Xiaomi Pad Mini 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	983 (min: 922) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	919 (min: 776) MBit/s ∼86%
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	934 (min: 861) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	804 (min: 671) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1446 (min: 1117) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1329 (min: 1163) MBit/s ∼86%
Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	808 (min: 402) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	737 (min: 358) MBit/s ∼69%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	578 (min: 420) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1539 (min: 1420) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	372 (min: 189) MBit/s ∼38%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	368 (min: 359) MBit/s ∼35%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	944 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1063 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1306 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1440 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼94%
Average of class Tablet
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	567 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	631 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1255 (min: 578) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1469 (min: 746) MBit/s ∼95%

Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1446 (1117-1518)

Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1329 (1163-1352)

Xiaomi Pad Mini 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø984 (922-1020)

Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø935 (861-962)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø366 (189-388)

Xiaomi Pad Mini 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø917 (776-971)

Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø804 (671-820)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø367 (359-369)

照相机 - 日光下的实用快照

Pad Mini 的 800 万像素前置摄像头可拍摄实用的自拍照，并以高达每秒 30 帧的速度录制 1080p 视频。主摄像头支持自动对焦，像素为 1300 万。它能以每秒 30 帧的速度录制高达 4K 的视频。

主摄像头的拍摄效果只能达到快照的水平，但在日光下看起来一点也不差。而变焦拍摄则比较模糊，弱光条件下也会让相机不堪重负。

测试实验室的测量结果证实了这一实际印象。在光线充足的条件下，主摄像头能准确再现参考色彩。在光线不足的情况下，只能获得暗淡、模糊的图像。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera Main camera 5x zoom Low light

click to load images

Xiaomi Pad Mini

Canon EOS 90D

OnePlus 13

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11

click to load images

Xiaomi Pad Mini

Canon EOS 90D

OnePlus 13

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11

click to load images

Xiaomi Pad Mini

Canon EOS 90D

OnePlus 13

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11

click to load images

Xiaomi Pad Mini

Canon EOS 90D

OnePlus 13

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11

ColorChecker Xiaomi Pad Mini: 7.1 ∆E min: 2.22 - max: 10.96 ∆E

附件和保修 - 带问号的交货范围

我们测试设备的供货范围包括一个 67 瓦的电源装置和一条 USB-C 连接线。如果该平板电脑也在欧盟正式发布，那么很可能会缺少电源适配器。

小米在其全球网站上提供了平板电脑的保护套和屏幕保护膜，但未提及价格。Pad Mini 还支持触控笔，如小米 Focus Pen和红米手写笔.

在欧盟，小米通常提供 24 个月的保修期保修。进口产品的保修期可能会缩短为 12 个月。

输入设备和操作 - 165 Hz 显示屏和笔支持

得益于高达 165 Hz 的高帧频，小米 Pad Mini 的显示效果极为流畅。凭借 1080 Hz 的最大触摸采样率，它还能非常快速、精确地实现手指和笔的输入。X 轴振动电机提供了良好的触觉反馈，使操作更加流畅。

这款平板电脑没有指纹传感器。只能通过自拍摄像头的 2D 人脸识别功能进行生物识别验证。

显示屏 - 小米 Pad Mini，3K 分辨率，支持 HDR

在测试（APL18 测量）中，TFT LCD 的最大亮度达到 720 cd/m²，因此亮度值比平常略高。

3K 显示屏的宽高比为 16:10，分辨率为 3008 x 1880 像素。支持 HDR10、HDR10+、HLG 和 Dolby Vision，HDR 支持非常出色。不过，该显示屏在 HDR 模式下最高只能达到 508 cd/m²。


669 cd/m²	684 cd/m²	658 cd/m²
689 cd/m²	681 cd/m²	660 cd/m²
661 cd/m²	680 cd/m²	690 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 690 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 674.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1.85 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 681 cd/m²
Contrast: 1195:1 (Black: 0.57 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
CCT: 6922 K

	Xiaomi Pad Mini TFT-LCD, 3008x1880, 8.8"	Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) IPS, 2266x1488, 8.3"	Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra LTPS, 2560x1600, 8.8"	Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU LTPS, 2560x1600, 8.8"	Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 LCD TFT, 1340x800, 8.7"
Screen		-0%	-73%	9%	-51%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	681	525 -23%	555 -19%	441 -35%	486 -29%
Brightness (cd/m²)	675	512 -24%	523 -23%	420 -38%	462 -32%
Brightness Distribution (%)	95	91 -4%	88 -7%	91 -4%	92 -3%
Black Level * (cd/m²)	0.57	0.43 25%	0.46 19%	0.5 12%	0.35 39%
Contrast (:1)	1195	1221 2%	1207 1%	882 -26%	1389 16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2	2 -0%	6.4 -220%	1.08 46%	6.2 -210%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.7	4.3 9%	12.6 -168%	2.52 46%	10.4 -121%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.4	3 12%	9.1 -168%	1.1 68%	5.7 -68%
Gamma	2.22 ^99%	2.2 ^100%	2.31 ^95%	2.19 ^100%	2.12 ^104%
CCT	6922 ^94%	7109 ^91%	9616 ^68%	6655 ^98%	7911 ^82%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8167 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

TFT 液晶显示屏的对比度高达 1200:1，能准确再现参考色彩。虽然与目标有细微偏差，但这些偏差低于感知阈值，只有在使用光分光计进行分析时才会发现。

色彩准确度（图像模式 Original Color Pro，目标色彩空间 sRGB）

色彩空间（图像模式 Original Color Pro，目标色彩空间 sRGB）

色彩饱和度（图像模式 Original Color Pro，目标色彩空间 sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
14.89 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4.025 ms rise
14.89 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10.86 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
32.48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 13.65 ms rise
32.48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18.83 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).

小米平板电脑还可以在户外阴凉处使用。不过，在直射光下，可视角度稳定的 TFT LCD 的亮度几乎不足以弥补玻璃表面的反光。

性能 - 配备高端 SoC 的小米 Pad Mini

小型小米平板电脑在性能方面遥遥领先。配备了联发科 Dimensity 9400+，Pad Mini 甚至击败了 iPad Mini 7在许多基准测试中。在人工智能测试中，它的表现也非常出色。

只有在浏览器测试中，它远远落后。不过，这在日常使用中并不明显，因为这款小平板电脑可以用来快速浏览网页。

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192	2989 Points +13%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (2478 - 2798, n=5)	2657 Points 0%
Xiaomi Pad Mini Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	2652 Points
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	2187 Points -18%
Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288	1867 Points -30%
Average of class Tablet (185 - 4128, n=101, last 2 years)	1431 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	738 Points -72%
Multi-Core
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (7749 - 9043, n=5)	8195 Points +2%
Xiaomi Pad Mini Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	8040 Points
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192	7452 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	6591 Points -18%
Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288	4828 Points -40%
Average of class Tablet (848 - 16544, n=101, last 2 years)	4592 Points -43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	2065 Points -74%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi Pad Mini Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	2626618 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (2396591 - 2841845, n=4)	2594211 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	1970442 Points -25%
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192	1570229 Points -40%
Average of class Tablet (164396 - 3475590, n=73, last 2 years)	1143367 Points -56%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	383511 Points -85%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	25683 Points +41%
Xiaomi Pad Mini Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	18208 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (17301 - 18344, n=3)	17951 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 27428, n=84, last 2 years)	12141 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	9083 Points -50%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (11599 - 12637, n=4)	12201 Points +5%
Xiaomi Pad Mini Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	11599 Points
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	8088 Points -30%
Average of class Tablet (195 - 13159, n=67, last 2 years)	5769 Points -50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	3120 Points -73%
System
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (13140 - 16550, n=4)	14964 Points +14%
Xiaomi Pad Mini Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	13140 Points
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	10983 Points -16%
Average of class Tablet (904 - 18343, n=67, last 2 years)	8960 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	6776 Points -48%
Memory
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (11248 - 13578, n=4)	12386 Points +10%
Xiaomi Pad Mini Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	11248 Points
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	7987 Points -29%
Average of class Tablet (401 - 17963, n=67, last 2 years)	6800 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	4152 Points -63%
Graphics
Xiaomi Pad Mini Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	55810 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (54322 - 55810, n=4)	54965 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	28083 Points -50%
Average of class Tablet (88 - 57192, n=67, last 2 years)	15445 Points -72%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	2683 Points -95%
Web
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (2152 - 2267, n=4)	2210 Points +1%
Xiaomi Pad Mini Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	2195 Points
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	1789 Points -18%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2370, n=67, last 2 years)	1502 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	1273 Points -42%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi Pad Mini Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	76852 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (72895 - 76852, n=4)	74932 Points -2%
Average of class Tablet (2597 - 76852, n=66, last 2 years)	16379 Points -79%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	16237 Points -79%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	6453 Points -92%

AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi Pad Mini Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	50153 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (49562 - 50153, n=2)	49858 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet (138 - 55794, n=57, last 2 years)	5710 Points -89%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	1485 Points -97%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	982 Points -98%

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
Xiaomi Pad Mini Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	1222 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (1143 - 1233, n=4)	1191 Points -3%
Average of class Tablet (166 - 5295, n=25, last 2 years)	727 Points -41%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	499 Points -59%
Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288	439 Points -64%
Half Precision NPU 1.5
Xiaomi Pad Mini Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	9263 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (8659 - 9597, n=4)	9147 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet (154 - 41155, n=25, last 2 years)	3774 Points -59%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	497 Points -95%
Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288	442 Points -95%
Quantized NPU 1.5
Xiaomi Pad Mini Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	12608 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (11834 - 13099, n=4)	12491 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet (88 - 57388, n=25, last 2 years)	5378 Points -57%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	1133 Points -91%
Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, Adreno 732, 12288	1019 Points -92%

AI Benchmark - Score V6
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (1945 - 12713, n=4)	7310 Points +275%
Average of class Tablet (70.4 - 12784, n=25, last 2 years)	3433 Points +76%
Xiaomi Pad Mini Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	1948 Points

其 Immortalis-G925图形芯片，小米 Pad Mini 还在 GPU 基准测试中获得了惊叹号。iPad Apple iPad Mini 7没有机会，只有联想Legion Tab TB321FU能在一定程度上跟上。联想平板电脑在 GFXBench 屏幕测试中遥遥领先，但这只是因为小米 Pad Mini 的运行频率为 120 Hz。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad Mini Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	5678 Points
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5012 Points -12%
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	3347 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	345 Points -94%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Pad Mini Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	5689 Points
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5088 Points -11%
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	3488 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	330 Points -94%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Pad Mini Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	19751 Points
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	18627 Points -6%
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	14693 Points -26%
Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11279 Points -43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1225 Points -94%

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Xiaomi Pad Mini Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	10051 Points
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	8453 Points -16%
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	5820 Points -42%

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Pad Mini Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	10283 Points
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	8501 Points -17%
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	5520 Points -46%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Pad Mini Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2210 Points
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1689 Points -24%
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	1323 Points -40%
Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	947 Points -57%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi Pad Mini Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2169 Points
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1707 Points -21%
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	1541 Points -29%
Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	958 Points -56%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	165 fps +38%
Xiaomi Pad Mini Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	60 fps -50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	59 fps -51%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad Mini Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	803 fps
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	533 fps -34%
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	447 fps -44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	63 fps -92%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	165 fps +38%
Xiaomi Pad Mini Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	60 fps -50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	58 fps -52%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad Mini Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	362 fps
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	361 fps 0%
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	247 fps -32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	40 fps -89%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	160 fps +37%
Xiaomi Pad Mini Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	117 fps
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	60 fps -49%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	50 fps -57%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad Mini Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	305 fps
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	269 fps -12%
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	164 fps -46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	25 fps -92%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	93 fps +21%
Xiaomi Pad Mini Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	77 fps
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	60 fps -22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	27 fps -65%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad Mini Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	166 fps
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	161 fps -3%
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	105 fps -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps -91%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad Mini Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	77 fps
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	62 fps -19%
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	53.7 fps -30%
Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	46 fps -40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	18 fps -77%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad Mini Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	72 fps -40%
Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53 fps -56%
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	41 fps -66%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.6 fps -95%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	122 fps +10%
Xiaomi Pad Mini Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	111 fps
Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	72 fps -35%
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	60 fps -46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	26 fps -77%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad Mini Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	309 fps
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	188 fps -39%
Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	138 fps -55%
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	133 fps -57%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps -95%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad Mini Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	52 fps
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	33 fps -37%
Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	23 fps -56%
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	21.7 fps -58%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2.4 fps -95%

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) (Safari Mobile 18.1.1)	269.214 Points +107%
Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra (Chrome 137)	239.594 Points +85%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (129.8 - 272, n=2)	201 Points +55%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU (Chrome 135)	191.974 Points +48%
Average of class Tablet (22.3 - 395, n=71, last 2 years)	146.1 Points +13%
Xiaomi Pad Mini (Chrome 141.0.7390.71)	129.818 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212)	71.728 Points -45%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) (Safari Mobile 18.1.1)	505 runs/min +222%
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 790, n=60, last 2 years)	186 runs/min +18%
Xiaomi Pad Mini (Chrome 141.0.7390.71)	157 runs/min
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (n=1)	157 runs/min 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212)	61.2 runs/min -61%

Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) (Safari Mobile 18.1.1)	30.8 runs/min +180%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU (Chrome 135)	17.6 runs/min +60%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (9.67 - 25.8, n=3)	15.5 runs/min +41%
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 49.1, n=61, last 2 years)	14.2 runs/min +29%
Xiaomi Pad Mini (Chrome 141.0.7390.71)	11 runs/min

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) (Safari Mobile 18.1.1)	267 Points +134%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (112 - 235, n=4)	173.8 Points +52%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU (Chrome 135)	165 Points +45%
Average of class Tablet (26 - 376, n=75, last 2 years)	133.5 Points +17%
Xiaomi Pad Mini (Chrome 141.0.7390.71)	114 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212)	81 Points -29%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) (Safari Mobile 18.1.1)	87812 Points +142%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU (Chrome 135)	70635 Points +95%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (36281 - 94555, n=4)	64239 Points +77%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 138481, n=102, last 2 years)	40662 Points +12%
Xiaomi Pad Mini (Chrome 141.0.7390.71)	36281 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212)	22187 Points -39%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (243 - 27101, n=84, last 2 years)	2662 ms * -167%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212)	1922.1 ms * -93%
Xiaomi Pad Mini (Chrome 141.0.7390.71)	998.1 ms *
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (391 - 998, n=4)	598 ms * +40%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU (Chrome 135)	541.2 ms * +46%
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) (Safari Mobile 18.1.1)	332.1 ms * +67%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Pad Mini	Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra	Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU	Samsung Galaxy Tab A9	Average 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		214%	255%	-10%	253%	84%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)	3585.32	1996.56 -44%	3984.3 11%	916.45 -74%	3938 ?(3585 - 4110, n=15) 10%	1663 ?(126.9 - 4093, n=89, last 2 years) -54%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)	1573.27	1866.05 19%	3483.56 121%	398.32 -75%	3454 ?(1573 - 4035, n=15) 120%	1216 ?(80.4 - 3773, n=89, last 2 years) -23%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)	411.55	392.27 -5%	355.12 -14%	182.74 -56%	378 ?(280 - 488, n=15) -8%	236 ?(20.1 - 475, n=89, last 2 years) -43%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)	48.23	474.41 884%	483.73 903%	128.92 167%	477 ?(48.2 - 678, n=15) 889%	268 ?(9.1 - 989, n=89, last 2 years) 456%

排放 - 多为酷平板电脑，扬声器性能良好

温度

在日常使用中，小米 Pad Mini 的外壳几乎不会发热。只有在长时间的负载情况下，例如进行烧毁基准测试时，其表面温度才会明显升高。即使在这种情况下，手持它也不会感到不舒服。在 3DMark 压力测试中，平板电脑的性能保持了很长时间，然后才会根据不同的情况下降到 71%。

Max. Load

Idle


40.5 °C	41.6 °C	41.9 °C
39.5 °C	41.5 °C	41.2 °C
38.3 °C	41.4 °C	41.3 °C

Maximum: 41.9 °C
Average: 40.8 °C


40.1 °C	40.3 °C	40.2 °C
40 °C	40.8 °C	40.2 °C
38.9 °C	40 °C	38.9 °C

Maximum: 40.8 °C
Average: 39.9 °C

Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.5 % +32%
Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	95.3 % +26%
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	90.4 % +20%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	76.5 % +1%
Xiaomi Pad Mini Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	75.6 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	98.1 % +34%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	85.7 % +17%
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	73.9 % +1%
Xiaomi Pad Mini Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	73.1 %
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	90.6 % +27%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	84.3 % +18%
Xiaomi Pad Mini Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	71.4 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra Adreno 732, SD 7+ Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	98.3 % +28%
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	92.3 % +20%
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe	79.1 % +3%
Xiaomi Pad Mini Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	76.8 %

Xiaomi Pad Mini Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø28.6 (24.7-33.8)

Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø17.1 (16.7-22.5)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.07 (2.05-2.09)

Xiaomi Pad Mini Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø91.1 (82.5-109.1)

Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø55 (54.2-59.9)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.53 (7.52-7.56)

Xiaomi Pad Mini Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø116.1 (113.7-116.5)

Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø61.5 (58-87.9)

Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø16.3 (16.2-16.7)

Xiaomi Pad Mini Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.2: Ø29.6 (24.3-34)

Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability: Ø16.1 (15.9-17.6)

Xiaomi Pad Mini Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.1: Ø14.5 (12.3-16.1)

Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability: Ø9.2 (8.99-11.4)

发言人

立体声扬声器通过线性的中音和高音产生非常好的音效，甚至在混音中也能听到较低的频率。外部音频设备可通过两个 USB-C 端口或蓝牙 5.4 连接。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Pad Mini audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 持久耐用，可在 1 小时内完成充电

耗电量

7500 毫安时电池的充电功率可达 67 瓦。使用小米电源装置，一个完整的充电周期大约需要一个小时。甚至还支持 18 瓦的反向充电。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.08 / 0.13 Watt
Idle	1.08 / 4.13 / 4.15 Watt
Load	10.69 / 11.08 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Pad Mini 7500 mAh	Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) 5078 mAh	Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra 7300 mAh	Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU 6550 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 5100 mAh	Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+	Average of class Tablet
Power Consumption		5%	-9%	21%	30%	-23%	-16%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	1.08	0.95 12%	1.36 -26%	1.4 -30%	0.7 35%	2.21 ?(0.83 - 3.9, n=5) -105%	2 ?(0.7 - 5.6, n=81, last 2 years) -85%
Idle Average * (Watt)	4.13	3.76 9%	4.16 -1%	1.9 54%	2.94 29%	4.02 ?(1.06 - 6.31, n=5) 3%	3.9 ?(1 - 9.2, n=81, last 2 years) 6%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	4.15	3.79 9%	4.21 -1%	2.6 37%	3.03 27%	4.17 ?(1.09 - 6.35, n=5) -0%	4.24 ?(1.3 - 9.5, n=81, last 2 years) -2%
Load Average * (Watt)	10.69	6.75 37%		6.6 38%	7.49 30%	10.2 ?(5.93 - 12.5, n=5) 5%	9.01 ?(2.5 - 34.9, n=75, last 2 years) 16%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	11.08	15.56 -40%		10.4 6%	8.02 28%	13.2 ?(11.1 - 15.8, n=5) -19%	13 ?(4.6 - 41.6, n=75, last 2 years) -17%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Pad Mini Mediatek Dimensity 9400+; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.91 (2.15-11.1)

Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) Apple A17 Pro; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.16 (1.601-15.8)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mediatek Helio G99; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.04 (1.429-4.98)

Xiaomi Pad Mini Mediatek Dimensity 9400+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.783 (1.733-2.4)

Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) Apple A17 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.764 (1.716-1.829)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mediatek Helio G99; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.459 (1.412-1.55)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Pad Mini Mediatek Dimensity 9400+; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.9 (10.1-11)

Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) Apple A17 Pro; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.9 (6.58-15.4)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mediatek Helio G99; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.88 (2.65-3.09)

Xiaomi Pad Mini Mediatek Dimensity 9400+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.783 (1.733-2.4)

Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) Apple A17 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.764 (1.716-1.829)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mediatek Helio G99; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.459 (1.412-1.55)

电池寿命

虽然小米 Pad Mini 的功耗有时明显高于对比设备，但在电池续航时间方面却不占优势。在 WLAN 测试中，这款小型平板电脑的续航时间接近 20 小时，甚至超过了 Apple iPad Mini 7甩在了后面。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing

19h 37min

Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3
Xiaomi Pad Mini 7500 mAh	19.6 h
Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) 5078 mAh	12 h
Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra 7300 mAh	15.9 h
Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU 6550 mAh	17.3 h
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 5100 mAh	14.3 h

Notebookcheck 总体评分

在测试中，小米 Pad Mini 给人留下了深刻印象，它是一款设备齐全、功能强大的平板电脑，与Apple iPad Mini 7 等竞争对手相比，小米 Pad Mini 难占上风。不过，由于这款 8.8 英寸的小米平板电脑尚未在欧盟正式发售，因此在测试时也很难买到。

Back to the verdict

Xiaomi Pad Mini - 10/24/2025 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

85 / 98 → 87%

Keyboard

68 / 80 → 85%

Pointing Device

94%

Connectivity

62 / 69 → 89%

Weight

86 / 40-88 → 96%

Battery

92%

Display

85%

Games Performance

47 / 65 → 73%

Application Performance

73 / 92 → 79%

AI Performance

78%

Temperature

88%

Noise

100%

Audio

83 / 91 → 92%

Camera

60 / 90 → 67%

Average

68%

89%

Tablet - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
40%

Packaging
75%

Power Use
96.2%

Repairability
20%

Software Updates
50%

Total Sustainability Score: 46.9%

可比较的替代品

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 88.5%	Xiaomi Pad Mini Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ ⎘ ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB	Amazon: 1. $244.91 Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Only WiFi... 2. $8.99 Suttkue For Xiaomi Pad Mini ... 3. $9.41 Case for Xiaomi Pad Mini 8.8... List Price: 500€	326 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	8.80" 3008x1880 403 PPI TFT-LCD
2. 86.6%	Apple iPad Mini 7 (2024) Apple A17 Pro ⎘ Apple A17 Pro GPU ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD	Amazon: $599.00 List Price: 1149€	297 g	Apple 512GB NVMe	8.30" 2266x1488 327 PPI IPS
3. 84%	Alldocube iPlay 70 Mini Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 732 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: 1. $369.99 ALLDOCUBE iPlay 70 mini Ultr... 2. $11.79 Clear Case for ALLDOCUBE iPl... 3. $16.97 Case Cover for ALLDOCUBE iPl... List Price: 400€	335 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8.80" 2560x1600 343 PPI LTPS
4. 86.5%	Lenovo Legion Tab TB321FU Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: 1. $12.99 Bkinew Clear Case for 2025 L... 2. $9.99 Suttkue for Lenovo Legion Ta... 3. $8.99 Supershieldz (2 Pack) Design... List Price: 599€	350 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	8.80" 2560x1600 343 PPI LTPS
5. 84.1% ^{v7 (old)}	Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 4 GB Memory, 64 GB UFS 2.1	Amazon: $110.98 List Price: 179€	332 g	64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.70" 1340x800 179 PPI LCD TFT

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.