Notebookcheck Logo

华为Nova 9 SE评论。拥有108MP摄像头的别致智能手机

辐射。 凭借Nova 9 SE,华为在其产品组合中拥有一款智能手机,它以高分辨率的摄像头、快速的快速充电和花哨的颜色变体而脱颖而出。这足以弥补谷歌服务的缺失吗?让我们在评论中找出答案。
Android Smartphone Touchscreen
Huawei Nova 9 SE (Nova Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) / Silver (Cortex-A53)
Graphics adapter
Memory
8192 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
6.78 inch 19.9:9, 2388 x 1080 pixel 387 PPI, Capacitive, LCD, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 110.29 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, digital compass, proximity, OTG
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 5, 8), LTE (Band 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.94 x 164.64 x 75.55
Battery
4000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix (f/1.9, 1/1.52", 0.7 µm) 8 MPix (Ultra Wide, f/2.2) 2 MPix (Depth, f/2.4) 2 MPix (Macro, f/2.4); 1.080p-Video; Camera2-API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.2, 22 mm)
Additional features
Speakers: Mono, Keyboard: Onscreen, 66W-Charger, USB-Cabel (Type-C to Type-A), SIM-Tool, Bumper, EMUI 12, 24 Months Warranty, Head-SAR: 0.80 W/kg, Body-SAR: 1.29W/kg; GNSS (Single-Band): GPS, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS; DRM Widevine L3; ClearKey 1.2, fanless
Weight
191 g, Power Supply: 137 g
Price
319 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

可能的竞争对手比较

Benchmark Comparison Plugin: ERROR, Layout "57" not supported!

外壳和功能。新星9 SE无DRM认证

华为Nova 9 SE有三种颜色版本。水晶蓝、午夜黑和珍珠白。我们的水晶蓝评测样品具有吸引人的彩虹色的背面。建造质量也令人印象深刻,以紧密和均匀的缝隙而令人信服。这款智能手机可以经受住扭曲测试,没有任何吱吱作响。

没有防尘和防水的IP认证。一般来说,华为在功能方面有点小气。双SIM卡可用,但没有通过microSD进行内存扩展的选项,也没有音频插孔。USB 2.0端口支持OTG,因此可以连接外部外设和存储设备。DRM认证也不可用,所以相应的受保护内容只能以SD质量消费。

尺寸比较

Benchmark Comparison Plugin: ERROR, Layout "0" not supported!

通信、软件和操作

华为依靠的是 高通骁龙680在Nova 9 SE中使用4G SoC。虽然该芯片组的骁龙X11调制解调器不支持5G,但它仍然相当快,即使在LTE网络中也能达到390MBit/s(下载)。Wi-Fi模块支持2.4和5.0GHz网络,在使用我们的参考路由器华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000进行测试时,具有预期的速度和高度稳定的数据率。

使用的操作系统是Android 11,没有谷歌服务,由华为内部的EMUI 12用户界面分层在上面。应用程序可以通过AppGallery安装,但许多知名的通信平台,如WhatsApp或Signal仍然缺失。然而,缺失的应用程序可以通过相关网站的花瓣搜索来安装,但这并不容易处理,特别是对于不太懂技术的用户。在测试时,安全补丁已于2022年3月1日更新,仍然是合理的最新版本。华为在这里的目标可能是一个季度的更新节奏。

华为Nova 9 SE的电容式触摸屏对输入有可靠的反应,并能精确地实现它们。在工厂里,屏幕保护膜被预先贴在未指定的玻璃上,这略微降低了滑行性能。

指纹扫描仪已被集成到电源按钮上,用于生物识别安全,它可以快速可靠地解锁智能手机。此外,也可以通过前置摄像头进行面部识别,其工作速度更快,但也不太安全。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Huawei Nova 9 SE
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
366 (351min - 381max) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy M23
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
363 (341min - 377max) MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
322 (162min - 386max) MBit/s ∼88% -12%
Oppo A76
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
311 (181min - 368max) MBit/s ∼85% -15%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy M23
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
340 (323min - 348max) MBit/s ∼100% +11%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
307 (299min - 312max) MBit/s ∼90%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
298 (198min - 345max) MBit/s ∼88% -3%
Oppo A76
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
282 (186min - 332max) MBit/s ∼83% -8%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360380Tooltip
Huawei Nova 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø306 (299-312)
Samsung Galaxy M23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø339 (323-348)
Huawei Nova 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø366 (351-381)
Samsung Galaxy M23 Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø363 (341-377)

照相机。华为智能手机中强大的主要光学器件

与华为Nova 9 SE的自拍
自拍

华为Nova 9 SE的前置摄像头可以拍出相当体面的照片,但在较重的照明条件下很快就会失去对比度。

主摄像头的核心是一个10800万像素的传感器(三星HM2,S5KHM2),它能拍出吸引人的照片。然而,骁龙680的图像处理器对此有点负担过重,因为它名义上只支持高达64MP。这并没有降低照片的质量,但确实影响了速度。这并不严重,但仍然很明显。其他镜头是较好的配件,但最多只能提供在线使用的可用结果。

说到电影,全高清和每秒30帧是最棒的。至少有一个4K的选项肯定会很好。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light
ColorChecker
6.7 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
4 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
5 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei Nova 9 SE: 5.08 ∆E min: 1.36 - max: 7.57 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.9 ∆E
54.1 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
44.9 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
53.8 ∆E
35.2 ∆E
42.8 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
65.1 ∆E
64.3 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
76 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
41.9 ∆E
92.9 ∆E
71 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei Nova 9 SE: 46.83 ∆E min: 14.02 - max: 92.93 ∆E

显示。非常精确和无闪烁的LCD

子像素结构
子像素结构

华为Nova 9 SE的6.78英寸LC屏幕提供了清晰的显示。刷新率可以设置为60或90赫兹,或者系统可以在这两个数值之间自动切换。

平均523cd/m²的亮度是体面的,在手动模式以及APL测量中也能达到。然而,在明亮的日子里,在户外使用该设备时,必须考虑到各种限制。由于黑值相当高,对比度也相当平庸。然而,显示器的色彩再现和白平衡是非常好的。此外,没有使用脉冲宽度调制(PWM)来控制亮度。

518
cd/m²
545
cd/m²
507
cd/m²
517
cd/m²
546
cd/m²
515
cd/m²
508
cd/m²
525
cd/m²
530
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 546 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 523.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.98 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 546 cd/m²
Contrast: 728:1 (Black: 0.75 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.6 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 0.8 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
96.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
Huawei Nova 9 SE
LCD, 2388x1080, 6.78
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
Oppo A76
IPS, 1612x720, 6.56
Samsung Galaxy M23
IPS, 2408x1080, 6.60
Response Times
89%
-100%
-71%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
41.28 ?(17.97, 23.31)
1.135 ?(1.121, 1.148)
97%
41 ?(20, 21)
1%
36 ?(17, 19)
13%
Response Time Black / White *
8.63 ?(4.65, 12.6)
1.635 ?(0.831, 0.8045)
81%
26 ?(11, 15)
-201%
22 ?(7, 15)
-155%
PWM Frequency
171.4
Screen
-34%
-66%
-203%
Brightness middle
546
702
29%
569
4%
551
1%
Brightness
523
701
34%
562
7%
525
0%
Brightness Distribution
93
98
5%
90
-3%
87
-6%
Black Level *
0.75
0.5
33%
0.4
47%
Contrast
728
1138
56%
1378
89%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.6
1
-67%
2.16
-260%
4.57
-662%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1
2.3
-130%
3.37
-237%
6.56
-556%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
0.8
1.4
-75%
1.8
-125%
5.1
-538%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.2 100%
2.177 101%
2.31 95%
CCT
6540 99%
6520 100%
6784 96%
7750 84%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
28% / -3%
-83% / -73%
-137% / -177%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8.63 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.65 ms rise
↘ 12.6 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41.28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.97 ms rise
↘ 23.31 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (36.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21764 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

灰度(色彩模式:正常,色温:标准。 目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(色彩模式:正常,色温:标准。 目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(色彩模式:正常,色温:标准。 目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(色彩模式:正常,色温:标准。 目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(色彩模式:正常,色温:标准。 目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(色彩模式:正常,色温:标准。 目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(色彩模式:正常,色温:标准。 目标色彩空间:sRGB)。
饱和度(色彩模式:正常,色温:标准。 目标色彩空间:sRGB)。
户外活动
户外活动
视角稳定
视角稳定

性能、排放和电池寿命

华为Nova 9 SE搭载了一台 高通Snapdragon 680 4GSoC,配备8GB LPDDR4x内存和 阿德雷诺610作为集成图形单元。该SoC被定位在中低端市场。系统速度出乎意料地好,也很流畅,但对游戏的期望值应该降低。虽然休闲游戏对华为智能手机来说没有问题,但像PUGB或Asphalt 9这样高要求的游戏,即使减少了细节,也不一定能顺利玩下去。也就是说,Nova 9 SE在任何时候都不会太热,可以持续地挖掘其全部性能。

只要音量不过分,下巴上的扬声器就能提供体面的声音体验。如果有必要,有线耳机或头戴式耳机可以通过可选的适配器连接到USB端口,而蓝牙则可以通过无线方式使用。

凭借其4000毫安时的电池,Nova 9 SE在我们的Wi-Fi测试中实现了良好的运行时间,在调整屏幕亮度(150cd/m²)后超过13小时。然而,在我们的比较中,它是尾随者,因为竞争对手一贯依赖更大的能量存储。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
382 Points ∼57%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
384 Points ∼57% +1%
Oppo A76
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
384 Points ∼57% +1%
Samsung Galaxy M23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
643 Points ∼96% +68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (374 - 384, n=5)
380 Points ∼56% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=253, last 2 years)
673 Points ∼100% +76%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1661 Points ∼75%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1738 Points ∼79% +5%
Oppo A76
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1675 Points ∼76% +1%
Samsung Galaxy M23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1846 Points ∼84% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (1557 - 1738, n=5)
1641 Points ∼75% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=253, last 2 years)
2201 Points ∼100% +33%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
6687 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
7694 Points ∼76% +15%
Oppo A76
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
6679 Points ∼66% 0%
Samsung Galaxy M23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
9800 Points ∼96% +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (6679 - 8730, n=5)
7304 Points ∼72% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 18567, n=148, last 2 years)
10178 Points ∼100% +52%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
2185 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2085 Points ∼42% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (2085 - 2190, n=4)
2157 Points ∼43% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 13121, n=223, last 2 years)
4968 Points ∼100% +127%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
2046 Points ∼29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1931 Points ∼28% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (1931 - 2096, n=4)
2030 Points ∼29% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 31940, n=223, last 2 years)
6952 Points ∼100% +240%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
2866 Points ∼88%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2589 Points ∼80% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (2589 - 2866, n=4)
2718 Points ∼84% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (651 - 6394, n=221, last 2 years)
3250 Points ∼100% +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1343 Points ∼53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1365 Points ∼54% +2%
Oppo A76
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1357 Points ∼54% +1%
Samsung Galaxy M23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1757 Points ∼69% +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (1332 - 1365, n=5)
1351 Points ∼53% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=179, last 2 years)
2536 Points ∼100% +89%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1168 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1188 Points ∼45% +2%
Oppo A76
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1177 Points ∼45% +1%
Samsung Galaxy M23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1593 Points ∼60% +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (1154 - 1188, n=5)
1169 Points ∼44% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=179, last 2 years)
2636 Points ∼100% +126%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
2817 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2683 Points ∼92% -5%
Oppo A76
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2930 Points ∼100% +4%
Samsung Galaxy M23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2749 Points ∼94% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (2683 - 2930, n=5)
2791 Points ∼95% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (688 - 5318, n=179, last 2 years)
2861 Points ∼98% +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1367 Points ∼34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1372 Points ∼34% 0%
Oppo A76
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1352 Points ∼34% -1%
Samsung Galaxy M23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2910 Points ∼72% +113%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (1352 - 1372, n=5)
1362 Points ∼34% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 11528, n=231, last 2 years)
4034 Points ∼100% +195%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1190 Points ∼24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1199 Points ∼24% +1%
Oppo A76
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1184 Points ∼24% -1%
Samsung Galaxy M23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2760 Points ∼55% +132%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (1184 - 1242, n=5)
1200 Points ∼24% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 19364, n=231, last 2 years)
5031 Points ∼100% +323%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
2853 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2573 Points ∼72% -10%
Oppo A76
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2683 Points ∼75% -6%
Samsung Galaxy M23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3595 Points ∼100% +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (2573 - 2853, n=5)
2693 Points ∼75% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (635 - 5793, n=231, last 2 years)
3245 Points ∼90% +14%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
453 Points ∼14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
447 Points ∼14% -1%
Oppo A76
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
446 Points ∼14% -2%
Samsung Galaxy M23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
644 Points ∼20% +42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (446 - 457, n=5)
450 Points ∼14% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (216 - 10062, n=184, last 2 years)
3182 Points ∼100% +602%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
442 Points ∼13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
435 Points ∼13% -2%
Oppo A76
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
439 Points ∼13% -1%
Samsung Galaxy M23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
635 Points ∼19% +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (417 - 463, n=5)
439 Points ∼13% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (205 - 11700, n=185, last 2 years)
3377 Points ∼100% +664%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
125 Points ∼13%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
125 Points ∼13% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
127 Points ∼13% +2%
Oppo A76
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
22 Points ∼2% -82%
Samsung Galaxy M23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
193 Points ∼20% +54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (22 - 127, n=6)
103.7 Points ∼11% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 3080, n=140, last 2 years)
984 Points ∼100% +687%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
124 Points ∼13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
124 Points ∼13% 0%
Oppo A76
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
120 Points ∼12% -3%
Samsung Galaxy M23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
189 Points ∼19% +52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (112 - 124, n=5)
120.4 Points ∼12% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 2864, n=136, last 2 years)
971 Points ∼100% +683%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
8.2 fps ∼28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
8.8 fps ∼31% +7%
Oppo A76
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
17 fps ∼59% +107%
Samsung Galaxy M23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
7.1 fps ∼25% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (8.2 - 17, n=5)
10.4 fps ∼36% +27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 98, n=249, last 2 years)
28.8 fps ∼100% +251%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
9.7 fps ∼28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
9.8 fps ∼29% +1%
Oppo A76
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
9.6 fps ∼28% -1%
Samsung Galaxy M23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
17 fps ∼50% +75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (5.1 - 9.8, n=5)
8.78 fps ∼26% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.9 - 123, n=250, last 2 years)
34.1 fps ∼100% +252%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
4.8 fps ∼24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
5 fps ∼25% +4%
Oppo A76
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
11 fps ∼55% +129%
Samsung Galaxy M23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
11 fps ∼55% +129%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (4.8 - 11, n=5)
6.24 fps ∼31% +30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.1 - 69, n=250, last 2 years)
19.9 fps ∼100% +315%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
3.3 fps ∼25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
3.2 fps ∼25% -3%
Oppo A76
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
3.3 fps ∼25% 0%
Samsung Galaxy M23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3.3 fps ∼25% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
  (1.4 - 3.3, n=5)
2.9 fps ∼22% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 47, n=250, last 2 years)
13 fps ∼100% +294%
Huawei Nova 9 SEXiaomi Redmi Note 11Oppo A76Samsung Galaxy M23Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-12%
-2%
-7%
-18%
-14%
Sequential Read 256KB
973.13
895.34
-8%
980.7
1%
867.2
-11%
756 ?(482 - 999, n=20)
-22%
934 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=246, last 2 years)
-4%
Sequential Write 256KB
714.41
519.23
-27%
711.7
0%
500.3
-30%
460 ?(105.3 - 857, n=20)
-36%
474 ?(11.9 - 1485, n=246, last 2 years)
-34%
Random Read 4KB
154.28
172.95
12%
174.7
13%
187.9
22%
165.7 ?(104.5 - 253, n=20)
7%
167.1 ?(13.5 - 345, n=246, last 2 years)
8%
Random Write 4KB
211.27
163.29
-23%
162.7
-23%
189.5
-10%
166.6 ?(120.4 - 213, n=20)
-21%
160.5 ?(56.5 - 458, n=247, last 2 years)
-24%

温度

Max. Load
 30.4 °C30 °C31.2 °C 
 30.6 °C28.7 °C30.4 °C 
 30 °C29 °C30 °C 
Maximum: 31.2 °C
Average: 30 °C
27.7 °C28.2 °C29 °C
27.9 °C28.3 °C29.5 °C
28.1 °C28.1 °C29.5 °C
Maximum: 29.5 °C
Average: 28.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  26.5 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.


扬声器

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.444.7252847.13132.644.94027.742.6503446.6632748.78023.65210022.350.912517.750.516016.15320012.853.925013.1573151258.5400961.2500116463010.767.780010.371.7100010.973125012.173.2160011.874.420001277250011.879.7315011.985.2400012.987.3500013.387.2630013.482.8800013.580.51000013.679.51250014.877.81600014.169.7SPL24.694N0.692.7median 12.8median 73Delta1.19.737.436.62828.232.625.427.7283437.82725.423.625.922.328.617.730.516.145.312.845.213.150.71257.3960.81168.410.771.110.374.410.973.712.176.411.878.61278.911.878.411.977.712.978.713.379.713.47813.572.713.670.714.868.614.161.224.6890.676.6median 12.8median 71.11.112.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei Nova 9 SEXiaomi Redmi Note 11
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei Nova 9 SE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (94 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Samsung Galaxy M23
5000 mAh
1004 min ∼38% +26%
Oppo A76
5000 mAh
993 min ∼38% +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (438 - 1953, n=254, last 2 years)
907 min ∼34% +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
5000 mAh
842 min ∼32% +6%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
4000 mAh
795 min ∼30%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (HuaweiBrowser 12)
13h 15min

Pros

+ 准确和无闪烁的LCD
+ 快速充电,功率为66瓦
+ 良好的主摄像头

Cons

- 既没有DRM认证,也没有谷歌服务
- 内存不能扩展
- 额外的镜头相当弱

评语。谷歌节制的良好整体包装

在审查中。华为Nova 9 SE。测试设备由华为德国公司提供。
在审查中。华为Nova 9 SE。测试设备由华为德国公司提供。

华为通过Nova 9 SE提供了一款吸引人的中端智能手机,其良好的主摄像头、持久的电池、准确的显示屏和非凡的色彩,特别令人信服。

华为Nova 9 SE是一款很好的智能手机,但它仍然必须没有谷歌服务

然而,这款华为智能手机也不得不忍受一些批评。面板本来可以更亮一些,并且有更高的对比度。此外,5G、DRM认证和谷歌移动服务(GMS)都没有提供。

华为在主摄像头上做对了很多事情,但额外的镜头并不真正令人信服。此外,视频录制只限于全高清30帧。

Nova 9 SE的强大替代品是 Galaxy M23Redmi Note 11.

价格和可用性

华为Nova 9 SE可以直接从华为在线商店以311欧元的价格购买。并经常在那里提供实物折扣,如免费耳机和其他配件。这款智能手机也可以在亚马逊以更便宜的价格提供。

Huawei Nova 9 SE - 06/17/2022 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
87%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
88%
Connectivity
46 / 70 → 66%
Weight
89%
Battery
90%
Display
89%
Games Performance
16 / 64 → 25%
Application Performance
67 / 86 → 78%
Temperature
94%
Noise
100%
Audio
81 / 90 → 90%
Camera
64%
Average
75%
80%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华为Nova 9 SE评论。拥有108MP摄像头的别致智能手机
Daniel Schmidt, 2022-06-19 (Update: 2022-06-19)