Notebookcheck

华为 Nova Plus 智能手机简短评测

Daniel Schmidt, Stefanie Voigt (translated by Yuchen Wang), 12/14/2016
Android Smartphone Touchscreen

4K视频拍摄终于到来! 华为Nova Plus是一台具备高端质感的主流机型,它也是来自这家中国生产商的第一台支持UHD视频拍摄的智能手机。不过,华为并没有为它搭配自己的麒麟处理器,而是选择了高通的一块芯片。这台智能手机在400欧元价位市场中的表现怎么样呢?

Huawei Nova Plus (Nova Series)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 506
Memory
3072 MB 
, LPDDR3
Display
5.5 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, 10点触控, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 24.01 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米整合音频接口, Card Reader: MicroSD最大支持128 GB (SDHC, SDXC), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 霍尔感应器,指纹感应器,近距感应器,环境光感应器,数码指南针,重力感应器, OTG, Wifi Direct
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1800 和 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (900 和 2100 MHz), LTE Cat. 7 (频段 1, 3, 7, 8, 20 和 38), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.3 x 151.8 x 75.7
Battery
14.7 Wh, 3340 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 4.4 V, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 25 h, Standby 2G (according to manufacturer): 427 h, Standby 3G (according to manufacturer): 448 h
Operating System
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix (自动对焦, 光学防抖, 双色调LED闪光灯, 超高清视频拍摄)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (定焦)
Additional features
Speakers: 单声道扬声器, Keyboard: 触控, 电源适配器,USB数据线,SIM卡工具,耳机, EMUI 4.1, 24 Months Warranty, USB-C, 身体辐射值: 1.42 W/kg, 头部辐射值: 1.41 W/kg, fanless
Weight
162 g, Power Supply: 67 g
Price
429 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

156.4 mm 76.4 mm 7 mm 165 g152.6 mm 77.4 mm 7.7 mm 155 g152.7 mm 74.7 mm 7.35 mm 161 g151.7 mm 75 mm 7.9 mm 175 g151.8 mm 75.7 mm 7.3 mm 162 g145.5 mm 71 mm 7.45 mm 153 g144.8 mm 71 mm 7.3 mm 155 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
337 MBit/s ∼100% +531%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
320 MBit/s ∼95% +499%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
121 MBit/s ∼36% +127%
Huawei Nova Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
53.4 MBit/s ∼16%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
32.9 MBit/s ∼10% -38%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
323 MBit/s ∼100% +527%
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
298 MBit/s ∼92% +479%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
112 MBit/s ∼35% +117%
Huawei Nova Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
51.5 MBit/s ∼16%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
31.2 MBit/s ∼10% -39%
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Huawei Nova Plus
Huawei Nova Plus
Huawei Nova Plus
Huawei Nova Plus
Huawei Nova Plus
Huawei Nova Plus

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
488
cd/m²
480
cd/m²
461
cd/m²
499
cd/m²
485
cd/m²
456
cd/m²
504
cd/m²
490
cd/m²
465
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 504 cd/m² Average: 480.9 cd/m² Minimum: 4.51 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 485 cd/m²
Contrast: 970:1 (Black: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.2 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
Gamma: 2.36
Huawei Nova Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
OnePlus 3
Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Honor 8
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
ZTE Axon 7
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2
Lenovo Moto Z Play
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Screen
-8%
-9%
-1%
-20%
22%
25%
Brightness middle
485
419
-14%
451
-7%
658
36%
328
-32%
378
-22%
509
5%
Brightness
481
431
-10%
443
-8%
633
32%
334
-31%
380
-21%
511
6%
Brightness Distribution
90
84
-7%
93
3%
93
3%
88
-2%
91
1%
93
3%
Black Level *
0.5
0.4
20%
0.66
-32%
Contrast
970
1128
16%
997
3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.2
4.1
2%
5.4
-29%
4.9
-17%
4.6
-10%
1.95
54%
2.2
48%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.9
12
-52%
9.9
-25%
9.1
-15%
14.7
-86%
3.09
61%
5.8
27%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.8
3.3
31%
6.7
-40%
5.8
-21%
2.8
42%
1.86
61%
2
58%
Gamma
2.36 93%
2.1 105%
2.33 94%
2.26 97%
2.29 96%
2.13 103%
2.25 98%
CCT
7568 86%
6550 99%
8262 79%
7840 83%
6612 98%
6376 102%
6768 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
89.38
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.4 ms rise
↘ 19.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9276 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
64601 Points ∼22%
ZTE Axon 7
122524 Points ∼42% +90%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
41676 Points ∼14% -35%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
62484 Points ∼21% -3%
Honor 8
94671 Points ∼32% +47%
OnePlus 3
142090 Points ∼48% +120%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
61345 Points ∼21% -5%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
3156 Points ∼10%
ZTE Axon 7
3867 Points ∼13% +23%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
4042 Points ∼13% +28%
Honor 8
5481 Points ∼18% +74%
OnePlus 3
4097 Points ∼14% +30%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
2525 Points ∼8% -20%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
845 Points ∼14%
ZTE Axon 7
1280 Points ∼21% +51%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
820 Points ∼14% -3%
Honor 8
1726 Points ∼29% +104%
OnePlus 3
1754 Points ∼29% +108%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
795 Points ∼13% -6%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
1795 Points ∼40%
ZTE Axon 7
1099 Points ∼24% -39%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
1479 Points ∼33% -18%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2112 Points ∼47% +18%
Honor 8
2587 Points ∼57% +44%
OnePlus 3
1789 Points ∼39% 0%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1631 Points ∼36% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
733 Points ∼6%
ZTE Axon 7
4619 Points ∼41% +530%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
275 Points ∼2% -62%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
719 Points ∼6% -2%
Honor 8
1112 Points ∼10% +52%
OnePlus 3
4633 Points ∼41% +532%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
725 Points ∼6% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
844 Points ∼10%
ZTE Axon 7
2698 Points ∼33% +220%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
336 Points ∼4% -60%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
842 Points ∼10% 0%
Honor 8
1273 Points ∼16% +51%
OnePlus 3
3424 Points ∼42% +306%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
827 Points ∼10% -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
15823 Points ∼18%
ZTE Axon 7
20408 Points ∼24% +29%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
9495 Points ∼11% -40%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
15984 Points ∼18% +1%
Honor 8
15531 Points ∼18% -2%
OnePlus 3
21771 Points ∼25% +38%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
15923 Points ∼18% +1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
13412 Points ∼3%
ZTE Axon 7
24310 Points ∼5% +81%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
7542 Points ∼1% -44%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
13466 Points ∼3% 0%
Honor 8
22157 Points ∼4% +65%
OnePlus 3
34023 Points ∼6% +154%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
13437 Points ∼3% 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
13882 Points ∼6%
ZTE Axon 7
23319 Points ∼10% +68%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
7903 Points ∼3% -43%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
13955 Points ∼6% +1%
Honor 8
20235 Points ∼9% +46%
OnePlus 3
30241 Points ∼13% +118%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
13920 Points ∼6% 0%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
23 fps ∼0%
ZTE Axon 7
88 fps ∼1% +283%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
14 fps ∼0% -39%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
23 fps ∼0% 0%
Honor 8
41 fps ∼0% +78%
OnePlus 3
89 fps ∼1% +287%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
23 fps ∼0% 0%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
23 fps ∼1%
ZTE Axon 7
53 fps ∼2% +130%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
14 fps ∼0% -39%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
21 fps ∼1% -9%
Honor 8
43 fps ∼1% +87%
OnePlus 3
60 fps ∼2% +161%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
23 fps ∼1% 0%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
9.9 fps ∼2%
ZTE Axon 7
39 fps ∼7% +294%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
3.8 fps ∼1% -62%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.9 fps ∼2% 0%
Honor 8
19 fps ∼3% +92%
OnePlus 3
47 fps ∼9% +375%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
10 fps ∼2% +1%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
10 fps ∼3%
ZTE Axon 7
28 fps ∼8% +180%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
3.8 fps ∼1% -62%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
9.7 fps ∼3% -3%
Honor 8
19 fps ∼5% +90%
OnePlus 3
46 fps ∼13% +360%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
10 fps ∼3% 0%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
6.2 fps ∼0%
ZTE Axon 7
31 fps ∼1% +400%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6.2 fps ∼0% 0%
Honor 8
10 fps ∼0% +61%
OnePlus 3
31 fps ∼1% +400%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
6.2 fps ∼0% 0%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
6.6 fps ∼0%
ZTE Axon 7
16 fps ∼0% +142%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6.1 fps ∼0% -8%
Honor 8
11 fps ∼0% +67%
OnePlus 3
30 fps ∼1% +355%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
6.7 fps ∼0% +2%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
3.7 fps ∼1%
ZTE Axon 7
18 fps ∼5% +386%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3.4 fps ∼1% -8%
Honor 8
6.3 fps ∼2% +70%
OnePlus 3
18 fps ∼5% +386%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
3.4 fps ∼1% -8%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
3.4 fps ∼2%
ZTE Axon 7
9.8 fps ∼6% +188%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3.4 fps ∼2% 0%
Honor 8
6.9 fps ∼4% +103%
OnePlus 3
18 fps ∼11% +429%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
3.7 fps ∼2% +9%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
5724 Points ∼29%
ZTE Axon 7
4970 Points ∼25% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
4008 Points ∼20% -30%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
6785 Points ∼35% +19%
Honor 8
6735 Points ∼34% +18%
OnePlus 3
7101 Points ∼36% +24%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
6767 Points ∼35% +18%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
754 Points ∼37%
ZTE Axon 7
963 Points ∼47% +28%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
741 Points ∼36% -2%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
702 Points ∼35% -7%
Honor 8
994 Points ∼49% +32%
OnePlus 3
1112 Points ∼55% +47%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
649 Points ∼32% -14%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
1015 Points ∼4%
ZTE Axon 7
4631 Points ∼16% +356%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
488 Points ∼2% -52%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1019 Points ∼4% 0%
Honor 8
1703 Points ∼6% +68%
OnePlus 3
4813 Points ∼17% +374%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1013 Points ∼4% 0%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
1553 Points ∼21%
ZTE Axon 7
1489 Points ∼20% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
554 Points ∼7% -64%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1042 Points ∼14% -33%
Honor 8
2556 Points ∼34% +65%
OnePlus 3
2052 Points ∼27% +32%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
795 Points ∼11% -49%
System (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
2132 Points ∼13%
ZTE Axon 7
3307 Points ∼20% +55%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
2153 Points ∼13% +1%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
2923 Points ∼18% +37%
Honor 8
3952 Points ∼24% +85%
OnePlus 3
3537 Points ∼21% +66%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
2069 Points ∼13% -3%
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
1262 Points ∼15%
ZTE Axon 7
2165 Points ∼26% +72%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
810 Points ∼10% -36%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
1215 Points ∼14% -4%
Honor 8
2034 Points ∼24% +61%
OnePlus 3
2496 Points ∼30% +98%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
1019 Points ∼12% -19%

Legend

 
Huawei Nova Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Axon 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 8 HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Lenovo Moto Z Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
83 Points ∼10%
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
111 Points ∼14% +34%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
64 Points ∼8% -23%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
84 Points ∼10% +1%
Honor 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
138 Points ∼17% +66%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
122 Points ∼15% +47%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
83 Points ∼10% 0%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4730 Points ∼9%
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8062 Points ∼15% +70%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
3611 Points ∼7% -24%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4905 Points ∼9% +4%
Honor 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
10692 Points ∼20% +126%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
9155 Points ∼17% +94%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4979 Points ∼10% +5%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
31.3 Points ∼9%
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
44.754 Points ∼13% +43%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
22 Points ∼6% -30%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
31.118 Points ∼9% -1%
Honor 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
64.046 Points ∼18% +105%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
54.4 Points ∼15% +74%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
31.8 Points ∼9% +2%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8027.7 ms * ∼13%
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3096.5 ms * ∼5% +61%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
11887 ms * ∼20% -48%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8041.4 ms * ∼14% -0%
Honor 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2979 ms * ∼5% +63%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2920.7 ms * ∼5% +64%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8168.9 ms * ∼14% -2%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei Nova Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
ZTE Axon 7
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Honor 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
AndroBench 3-5
81%
-35%
53%
8%
101%
31%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
33.32
51.34
54%
50.07
50%
23.59
-29%
50.57
52%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
41.64
78.39
88%
79.22
90%
53.68
29%
74.58
79%
Random Write 4KB
30.12
16.22
-46%
11.2
-63%
7.4
-75%
31.5
5%
18.23
-39%
45.58
51%
Random Read 4KB
35.64
121.07
240%
22.9
-36%
74
108%
34.16
-4%
137.62
286%
38.78
9%
Sequential Write 256KB
82.13
150.92
84%
60.4
-26%
188
129%
119.25
45%
153.3
87%
73.14
-11%
Sequential Read 256KB
241.57
406.49
68%
209.4
-13%
282
17%
247.46
2%
408.71
69%
254.78
5%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettingsValue
 high28 fps
 very low29 fps
Max. Load
 34.9 °C34.9 °C36.6 °C 
 34.5 °C35.3 °C39.2 °C 
 33.5 °C34.2 °C39 °C 
Maximum: 39.2 °C
Average: 35.8 °C
31.4 °C32.3 °C33.2 °C
32.2 °C32.8 °C33.2 °C
31.5 °C32.7 °C32.9 °C
Maximum: 33.2 °C
Average: 32.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  30.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.6422525.437.63125.331.44032.936.35033.651.76331.634.38028.431.71002736.912520.8261602229.920021.341.825020.853.931521.259.440019.463.650019.567.463017.766.180017.970.1100017.869.8125017.373.4160017.474.6200016.776.7250017.277.2315018.278.9400017.979.6500017.676630017.772.9800017.873.21000017.971.11250018.164.51600018.257.2SPL3087.4N1.368.4median 17.9median 69.8Delta1.310.231.632.825.430.425.332.132.933.333.63631.630.128.427.82725.420.825.62229.121.339.620.848.321.254.219.456.819.559.117.758.117.961.117.864.417.365.817.467.416.770.317.27118.277.117.979.117.673.517.772.117.87117.966.418.157.518.253.13084.71.353.4median 17.9median 61.11.310.740.136.832.440.1382731.33834.330.631.734.334.529.72634.544.138.139.444.140.529.736.240.53331.428.63326.827.625.426.826.924.421.326.93724.823.33745.529.522.545.551.636.222.451.657.341.721.357.359.746.618.459.766.452.517.566.468.45217.568.469.952.517.269.971.853.816.871.872.554.817.372.575.256.917.475.278.459.716.678.477.659.717.377.678.260.817.678.281.363.817.681.378.561.817.778.575.958.817.475.976.259.417.776.274.357.517.974.370.354.818.170.354.437.618.154.488.671.129.888.67325.81.373median 70.3median 53.8median 17.7median 70.311.910.41.611.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei Nova PlusHonor 8OnePlus 3
Huawei Nova Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.39 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Honor 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

OnePlus 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.61 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.03 / 0.11 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.49 / 1.63 / 1.76 Watt
Load midlight 2.98 / 4.99 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei Nova Plus
3340 mAh
OnePlus 3
3000 mAh
Honor 8
3000 mAh
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3000 mAh
ZTE Axon 7
3250 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
2900 mAh
Power Consumption
-36%
-35%
-28%
-29%
-19%
Idle Minimum *
0.49
0.57
-16%
0.78
-59%
0.83
-69%
0.64
-31%
0.96
-96%
Idle Average *
1.63
1.24
24%
1.89
-16%
2.11
-29%
0.84
48%
1.64
-1%
Idle Maximum *
1.76
1.36
23%
2.02
-15%
2.12
-20%
0.87
51%
1.71
3%
Load Average *
2.98
5.92
-99%
5.28
-77%
3.41
-14%
6.02
-102%
2.98
-0%
Load Maximum *
4.99
10.53
-111%
5.44
-9%
5.46
-9%
10.45
-109%
5.08
-2%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
34h 08min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
13h 40min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 12min
Load (maximum brightness)
6h 06min
Huawei Nova Plus
3340 mAh
OnePlus 3
3000 mAh
Honor 8
3000 mAh
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL
3000 mAh
ZTE Axon 7
3250 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
2900 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z Play
3510 mAh
Battery Runtime
-11%
-31%
-3%
-26%
3%
41%
Reader / Idle
2048
1338
-35%
1487
-27%
1502
-27%
1735
-15%
2323
13%
2540
24%
H.264
732
847
16%
526
-28%
905
24%
704
-4%
672
-8%
1190
63%
WiFi v1.3
820
840
2%
499
-39%
797
-3%
411
-50%
626
-24%
824
0%
Load
366
268
-27%
255
-30%
352
-4%
245
-33%
483
32%
652
78%

Pros

+ 高品质机身
+ USB-C
+ 优秀的屏幕
+ 可靠的指纹识别器
+ 优秀的相机
+ 长电池续航

Cons

- 高辐射值
- 仅支持2.4GHz无线网络
- 不支持App2SD/microSD卡无法作为内部存储
- 仅混合式双SIM卡支持
In review: Huawei Nova Plus. Test model courtesy of Huawei Germany.
In review: Huawei Nova Plus. Test model courtesy of Huawei Germany.

华为Nova Plus是一台十分优秀的智能手机,它几乎没有什么弱点。除了明亮的屏幕,你还可以得到两个非常优秀的相机。它的前置相机会备受喜爱自拍的用户青睐。它提供了大容量的电池,可以保证这台设备的实际使用续航达到一天以上。

不过你可能需要在机身品质上做出一些牺牲,但这也是属于吹毛求疵的程度。遗憾的还有它无法将应用保存在microSD卡上,同时读卡器的传输速度也较低。5.0GHz无线网支持在这个价位上也应该受到更多重视。

华为Nova Plus是一台具备优秀的相机和长电池续航的优秀全面设备。

我们认为Nova Plus的整体表现均衡,仍然值得向用户推荐。不过,同时看看这个价位的其他设备也不会是个坏事。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Huawei Nova Plus - 12/02/2016 v5.1(old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
86%
Keyboard
69 / 75 → 92%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
42 / 60 → 70%
Weight
91%
Battery
95%
Display
86%
Games Performance
33 / 63 → 52%
Application Performance
50 / 70 → 72%
Temperature
89%
Noise
100%
Audio
60 / 91 → 66%
Camera
75%
Average
75%
86%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华为 Nova Plus 智能手机简短评测
Daniel Schmidt, 2016-12-14 (Update: 2016-12-17)